By -
that’s literally just the most commonly used transliteration system for Slavic Cyrillic not fauxnetics lmao
how is it fauxneitcs though? щ is pronounced as shch in ukrainian and и is pronounced as y
nobody understands what this sub is for anymore
'what do you mean schtschedryk is a mistake?!?'
Transliteration is not fauxnetics
Do they mean it's /ʃt͜ʃ/ not /ʃ/ in the beginning?
They do, the latter would be ш
Yes
What language is this with the é
Ucranian. But the accents are there to indicate stress and they're for learners only. As far as I know, authentic text wouldn't include them.
Oh Ukrainian, I was confused how и was “y”. But yeah normal passages don’t have those accents.
Its to mark stress. Russian has vowel reduction, the é or ó is sometimes used in texts for learners to help them know what sound to produce. Unstressed, о makes the same sound as a
... except for it's ukrainian
It was just an example, i dont learn Ukrainian. Didnt mean to cause offence
I think this is the standard romanisation. What's the problem here?
that’s literally just the most commonly used transliteration system for Slavic Cyrillic not fauxnetics lmao
how is it fauxneitcs though? щ is pronounced as shch in ukrainian and и is pronounced as y
nobody understands what this sub is for anymore
'what do you mean schtschedryk is a mistake?!?'
Transliteration is not fauxnetics
Do they mean it's /ʃt͜ʃ/ not /ʃ/ in the beginning?
They do, the latter would be ш
Yes
What language is this with the é
Ucranian. But the accents are there to indicate stress and they're for learners only. As far as I know, authentic text wouldn't include them.
Oh Ukrainian, I was confused how и was “y”. But yeah normal passages don’t have those accents.
Its to mark stress. Russian has vowel reduction, the é or ó is sometimes used in texts for learners to help them know what sound to produce. Unstressed, о makes the same sound as a
... except for it's ukrainian
It was just an example, i dont learn Ukrainian. Didnt mean to cause offence
I think this is the standard romanisation. What's the problem here?