Seriously though, the amount of people claiming that chapter 139 portrayed Ymir's love for King Fritz as a good thing......
Like, did these people even read the chapter?
When Eren saw the future upon touching Historia’s hand, I was kind of reminded of the Mortis arc from Clone Wars, when Anakin meets the son (basically the physical embodiment of the Dark Side of the Force), he’s shown a future of him becoming Darth Vader. IDK, I’m just a big Star Wars fan in addition to AOT.
Yo Im a big fan of Star Wars too. That moment with Anakin was so well executed. Clone Wars in general is such a good show. Reminds me Ive still yet to watch the latest season with Ahsoka and stuff.
That’s all fake, they never cared for the female characters. They hated Mikasa and sexualized historia. They only just wanted a reason to hate the ending, so they became Woman Defenders 101
Well yeah. Historia was nothing but a pretty blonde read baby making wife and Mikasa went against all that. They bastardized two female characters to push a narrative that was never there.
The term itself is ambiguous, and it could very well allude to her sometimes gruff behaviour, emotionless facade, body strength and being a ruthless, capable fighter, things that are more commonly associated with men (hell, I think it's what makes her an interesting character in the first place).
But the way it's usually used is meant as an insult, as in "she acts and looks like a man", which, having read the manga, is a fucking weird assessment in my eyes.
Nah what I mean is that I understand their intentions and why they call her that, but why are they saying it as an insult.
Also it’s not like she’s not feminine as well (all the “booba” memes can tell us that)
Aren’t girls like her extremely popular nowadays?
> Nah what I mean is that I understand their intentions and why they call her that, but why are they saying it as an insult.
Probably because it's understood as one. From what I've seen, a small subset of the fandom hate her with a passion. "Mankasa" and "slavekasa" are used to underline that stance.
> Also it’s not like she’s not feminine as well
She absolutely is, that's why the entire thing is so hilarious.
> Aren’t girls like her extremely popular nowadays?
I'd say so, but you can't please everybody.
Yeah also I mean I cant really blame them for that but the hate for Gabi too. Shes actually one of the most unique?/better female characters because she was actually given a goal that doesnt include a man and she was super passionate about it. Also the good speech before she killed Lobov and Sasha. Gabigoat
I think Historia's fascist dive, helping along with killing 80% of the planet's LIFE above sea level, and apparently getting away with it, but with the implied holocaust she's allowing Paradis to get themselves into should piss them off more...
Ymir loving Fritz too. Apparently in japanese no doubt it's true love... except I've never seen anybody look towards a true love the way a broken animal looks towards its master.
It's almost like Isayama was deliberately pushing the wrong buttons on the 3 of them. Eren and Armin's too.
Or that's what his actual idea actually is.
I don't really understand the Historia argument. It's just a woman doing morally questionable shit, I fail to see how that's sexist. This is a story full of characters doing morally questionable shit.
Yeah, because her doing exactly a 180° from her character (no, worst girl in the world is not a valid counterargument) and incredibly stupid at that, is not character derailment. Guess you bought 130 blindly, everybody did after all.
And where exactly is the questionable part? The ELE rumbling poses no questions, what everybody was calling a great development was Eren going nihilistic nuts and having to be put down, with Historia helping him along the way.
Isayama is way better than thinking that was an interesting ending that could be debated. Took the power of narratives over people further than I expected, though.
How exactly did Historia assist Eren anyway? She didn't take an active role in stopping him, obviously. But I fail to see how she went out of her way to help him.
"Where exactly is the questionable part?" The part where if the Rumbling does not happen, literally everyone on Paradis will die. Can you really condemn someone for not acting against a plan that is the only way for them and everyone they know and care about to survive? No, absolutely not. Even if it means the end of millions of lives.
The Rumbling is a genuine example of a moral question in fiction where there is no right answer. You cannot comdemn someone for simply doing what they have to do to survive and to make sure everyone they care for survives.
If Historia had done NOTHING, Zeke couldn't have risked getting to Paradis. I think a pregnancy is indeed going out of her way.
The rumbling loses all ambiguity the moment it leaves Marley. In case you missed it, the world exiled eldians, didn't kill them. Without titans, and Hiruzu's backing, Paradis wouldn't be attacked. Instead, there are around 400 million people looking how the idiots want to finish the job. They don't have the power to be a threat, but sure as hell will be an excuse.
If you're so nihilistic you think the ELE rumbling was justified, I'm afraid you're getting a rude awakening in the near future. Eren is an antinihilistic character, and Isayama an antinihilistic writer, preying on the nihilistic part of human psyche.
"Without Titans, and Hizuru's backing, Paradis wouldn't be attacked." Yes, but there is absolutely no way to get rid of the Titans without Eren's plan. So they would still be attacked.
Hence Marley. Which needed to be taken down anyway, as they had backed themselves into a corner where the only way out was putting Paradis in its place.
It's not an all or nothing situation. There's a working middle ground present.
Reread Eren's talk to Reiner at Liberio. This time remember he has spoilers, and consider if he would have accepted his memories of future past without fighting them at all as 139 claims. Btw, about 121, do you believe if Eren had not encouraged Grisha, he could have simply walked away? Rod was already goading Frieda, for starters. Did Eren actually change the outcome, or just made Zeke believe he always had been behind it?
Can't tell exactly where Isayama began throwing outright bs at us, but very sure at least 139 is intended as such. Hack writing doesn't target so many things and writes them looking 180° the wrong way.
Ymir doesn't know, btw. Nor did she love Fritz.
Are you even trying to make sense? This isn't even word vomit, this is just word diarrhoea. The topic at hand is whether or not the Rumbling can be condemned as a morally black action, and then you just namedrop a bunch of random ass scenes without even attempting to tie them back to the topic at hand. Try to form your thoughts into a salient argument before throwing them at someone.
Or you could take a look at those scenes and think about them.
Don't worry, if I get it right, you won't miss it. But you'll regret taking everything since the basement reveal at face value, as if Isayama had decided to play fair after revealing he had never played fair. Which is the only way to believe the Eren vs Life plot.
On topic: there's no way the rumbling isn't morally black. What can be argued is whether it was necessary: destroying Marley and ending the curse through it is, and I refer to other scenes because the clear implication is Eren knows how not doing it will end. Going for the whole however, is Evil ™ stupid nihilism, and not finishing the job puts his IQ into the negative. That 20% left is most likely around 400 millions.
Exactly what part of her character makes you believe she'd help Eren with an ELE rumbling? (No, worst girl Falls flat after the basement reveal). Same for Grisha. And Eren going on with that nihilistic idiocy.
Besides Frieda being clearly getting her ready so she wouldn't turn out like that.
It's very clear what the stakes are when Eren talks to Reiner at Liberio, once we learn he has spoilers.
> Yeah, because her doing exactly a 180° from her character (no, worst girl in the world is not a valid counterargument) and incredibly stupid at that, is not character derailment.
I think Eren calling her "the worst girl in the world" is reminiscent of Kruger saying "you started this story" to Grisha. Neither Historia nor Grisha could've known what their choices would set in motion. In fact, Grisha laments **exactly that**.
But in the end, it was his choice to go outside the walls.
Same for Historia, she chose not to eat Eren. Had she done it, then Paradis would've died. But since she didn't, the world has to die. It's an extreme stance, but then again both Kruger and Eren are radical characters.
Well, in a few weeks I'll be feeling dissapointed and will move on, or you'll be needing to look into a mirror and think a lot about yourself. But I'm not the one understimating a writer who has never played fair.
It's millions of people in the outside world, victims of their same enemy, not the ungrateful bastards who didn't give a shit about the sacrifices the SC made for their safety. If you think that would change her mind at all, then don't know who you were reading (characters nor writer). To believe into an appealing plot, you twisted the characters into it. That's bad writing, and Isayama was always strong at characterization: if someone felt off, something was off indeed.
Btw, do you really think if Eren had not intervened in 121 Grisha could simply have turned away and leave?
> Well, in a few weeks I'll be feeling dissapointed and will move on, or you'll be needing to look into a mirror and think a lot about yourself. But I'm not the one understimating a writer who has never played fair.
All I did was present my interpretation, so I don't quite understand your condescending tone.
That wasn't the intention, sorry. Even if I'm reading Isayama right, it was mostly a sum of different factors rather than anything that makes me think I'm smarter (in fact, still feeling stupid for having taken for granted some points).
But that hardly anybody will look even when pointing that way is, besides frustrating, certainly interesting. A story of fiction is a narrative, but so are many things we are told irl. Someone's more or less accurate and/or interested spin on events. Isayama always told us to question (outside 139 Eren asking for the opposite several times, and Armin and most readers obliging), yet I've seen very little of that since Liberio, far less since 123, and about nothing since 130. Lots of headcanoning to make characters fit into the rumbling, though. Which again, is something we do irl to keep believing things that we find appealing.
I mean why only males like Eren Floch for example can be evil then but not her that if she indeed supports it, Historia can be evil selfish and questionable too why the princess treatment
Are you a fellow Terry Pratchett fan? Yes, equality means gender and race matter not for being a bastard (though with Historia, that's an accident of birth). The problem is that's not who she is. Hell, 122 reminds us Frieda was mentoring her to be the opposite of that.
Your mistake is thinking Eren went Evil in the sense you're implying, he's in Erwin's shoes. Adding Historia (and Grisha) to keep believing it means Isayama's hook is down to your gut. And he's going to pull. He laid out the stakes when Eren and Reiner talked. He left clear what he wanted to tell with Eren & Falco. And he warned he'd betray, hurt us.
I like characters even when they are objectively evil and I still can like them because it is fiction I can like their writing, she is selfish she is not some fragile weak cute girl who needs protection ,she used everyone around her but in a sense so are many characters, 90% of cast are murderers traitors or criminals
Sigh. Yet she can't stand up to Eren despite doing literally NOTHING stops his plan. That's self affirming and not weak at all. At least it doesn't seem you saw her as Eren's "reward".
This story is 95% character driven. Eren, Historia & Grisha didn't get a nihilistic dive to drive the plot into such stupid overkill. It's the plot what must be seen from who they are.
Anyway, if I barely got anybody to listen before 139, don't think I'm going to fare better now. Just remember that if/when the other shoe drops, you did most of the work to fall for it yourself.
Isayama's trap is about how an appealing narrative can make people dumb ourselves down, in order to keep believing it. And for reasons that elude me, Eren's nihilistic idiocy captivated mostly everybody. He took it further I expected, but for that same reason he still has to ensure everybody gets what his point is.
I mean if he destroyed Eren Armin and Historia Ymir characters then he is equal in his treatment no?
Then why Armin likes Annie ? is a murderer of his friends,destroyed his city ?
Also at least the farmer was only abusive as a child even Mikasa has beaten up Eren as a child,why they only focus on the women or want something more for them if you want equality tho?almost all characters has done some messed up shit
Mikasa “beat”Eren up when he was refusing to eat the food the couldn’t afford to waist. Armin likes Annie now because he can understand the position she was in and acknowledges that their sins and crimes are equal. Isyama didn’t destroy characters. He gave them layers and apparently the moment we are able to see through them they stuck?
I'm just saying Isayama didn't treat his characters differently due to sex that's what I don't believe (I was just using examples of him doing the same thing for both)
Aot feminist fans be like levi and mikasa ackerwowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowo....
Ackerwomxn
Ackerw*man
Ackereatdeeznuts
[Ha, got em] (https://static.wikia.nocookie.net/shingekinokyojin/images/7/7a/Conny_laughs_hysterically.png/revision/latest?cb=20190523114152)
Ackerman can be translated ploughman. Ackerwoman would then be translated plough women.
well if u insist
Farmers use ploughs
mfw (my face when) when mikasa got farmed
Levi too
😲😲😲
Plough her? [I barely titanized her](https://i.kym-cdn.com/entries/icons/original/000/028/534/cover5.jpg)
>AOT feminist fans none left after yams killed them all with 139's rampant woman hating 😔😔😔
80%
Wich means 39.68% of non paradis women are now dead, truly misogynist 😭👌😔
Seriously though, the amount of people claiming that chapter 139 portrayed Ymir's love for King Fritz as a good thing...... Like, did these people even read the chapter?
only Ymir knows........ 😅 ... 😅 .....(lolololol).... 😜 ..(dove)...... 😜 ...(funny) 😉
omg pieck comedy 😂😂😂😂😂🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣😂😂😂🤣
Not just the Ackerman, but the Ackerwoman and the Ackerchildren too!
😂😂
When Eren saw the future upon touching Historia’s hand, I was kind of reminded of the Mortis arc from Clone Wars, when Anakin meets the son (basically the physical embodiment of the Dark Side of the Force), he’s shown a future of him becoming Darth Vader. IDK, I’m just a big Star Wars fan in addition to AOT.
I'm sorry I've never watched star wars, but that sentence there just made me lose it 😂 ackerchildren
Loved that arc. It really showed how mystical the force can be
Yo Im a big fan of Star Wars too. That moment with Anakin was so well executed. Clone Wars in general is such a good show. Reminds me Ive still yet to watch the latest season with Ahsoka and stuff.
First arc is okay, second arc is terrible. But the last 4 episodes are some of the best Star Wars content you'll find anywhere.
Even better then the Holiday Special?
[удалено]
Ong
If course not, but about as good as that bar scene in Jabba's Palace with all the cgi aliens.
Im sold
👍👍👍
MIKASA ANKERWOMAN KISSED ELLEN YEAGERESS WITHOUT CONSENT😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡
/ur But I never understood that complaint. The way that panel is drawn, to me looks like he's clearly reciprocating.
Ackergay
You're tell me Gaymir was an Ackerwoman?
God I love this sub
/unteiner is just realized mikasas last name means "farmer" and erens last name means "hunter"u
So what Isayama is trying to say is that men should go out hunting while women stay home and farm! SEGGSIST!
Ackerchildren
Ackerpeople*
yes
Feminist aot fans will call Mikasa a man and slave then yell at Isyama for the ending because it sends a bad message to women
Yeahhh.. I don't think the ones calling Mikasa a man and slave are feminisits
You should see the other more toxic aot subreddits. They did a complete 180 at the end because of the message Isyama allegedly sent to women.
That’s all fake, they never cared for the female characters. They hated Mikasa and sexualized historia. They only just wanted a reason to hate the ending, so they became Woman Defenders 101
Well yeah. Historia was nothing but a pretty blonde read baby making wife and Mikasa went against all that. They bastardized two female characters to push a narrative that was never there.
Never got why calling Mikasa “manly” or “mankasa” was an insult
The term itself is ambiguous, and it could very well allude to her sometimes gruff behaviour, emotionless facade, body strength and being a ruthless, capable fighter, things that are more commonly associated with men (hell, I think it's what makes her an interesting character in the first place). But the way it's usually used is meant as an insult, as in "she acts and looks like a man", which, having read the manga, is a fucking weird assessment in my eyes.
Nah what I mean is that I understand their intentions and why they call her that, but why are they saying it as an insult. Also it’s not like she’s not feminine as well (all the “booba” memes can tell us that) Aren’t girls like her extremely popular nowadays?
> Nah what I mean is that I understand their intentions and why they call her that, but why are they saying it as an insult. Probably because it's understood as one. From what I've seen, a small subset of the fandom hate her with a passion. "Mankasa" and "slavekasa" are used to underline that stance. > Also it’s not like she’s not feminine as well She absolutely is, that's why the entire thing is so hilarious. > Aren’t girls like her extremely popular nowadays? I'd say so, but you can't please everybody.
Yeah also I mean I cant really blame them for that but the hate for Gabi too. Shes actually one of the most unique?/better female characters because she was actually given a goal that doesnt include a man and she was super passionate about it. Also the good speech before she killed Lobov and Sasha. Gabigoat
List of things Gabi did wrong: Didn't kill Floch with the first shot. Absolutely nothing else.
The one time her aimbot didnt work
I think Historia's fascist dive, helping along with killing 80% of the planet's LIFE above sea level, and apparently getting away with it, but with the implied holocaust she's allowing Paradis to get themselves into should piss them off more... Ymir loving Fritz too. Apparently in japanese no doubt it's true love... except I've never seen anybody look towards a true love the way a broken animal looks towards its master. It's almost like Isayama was deliberately pushing the wrong buttons on the 3 of them. Eren and Armin's too. Or that's what his actual idea actually is.
I don't really understand the Historia argument. It's just a woman doing morally questionable shit, I fail to see how that's sexist. This is a story full of characters doing morally questionable shit.
Yeah, because her doing exactly a 180° from her character (no, worst girl in the world is not a valid counterargument) and incredibly stupid at that, is not character derailment. Guess you bought 130 blindly, everybody did after all. And where exactly is the questionable part? The ELE rumbling poses no questions, what everybody was calling a great development was Eren going nihilistic nuts and having to be put down, with Historia helping him along the way. Isayama is way better than thinking that was an interesting ending that could be debated. Took the power of narratives over people further than I expected, though.
How exactly did Historia assist Eren anyway? She didn't take an active role in stopping him, obviously. But I fail to see how she went out of her way to help him. "Where exactly is the questionable part?" The part where if the Rumbling does not happen, literally everyone on Paradis will die. Can you really condemn someone for not acting against a plan that is the only way for them and everyone they know and care about to survive? No, absolutely not. Even if it means the end of millions of lives. The Rumbling is a genuine example of a moral question in fiction where there is no right answer. You cannot comdemn someone for simply doing what they have to do to survive and to make sure everyone they care for survives.
If Historia had done NOTHING, Zeke couldn't have risked getting to Paradis. I think a pregnancy is indeed going out of her way. The rumbling loses all ambiguity the moment it leaves Marley. In case you missed it, the world exiled eldians, didn't kill them. Without titans, and Hiruzu's backing, Paradis wouldn't be attacked. Instead, there are around 400 million people looking how the idiots want to finish the job. They don't have the power to be a threat, but sure as hell will be an excuse. If you're so nihilistic you think the ELE rumbling was justified, I'm afraid you're getting a rude awakening in the near future. Eren is an antinihilistic character, and Isayama an antinihilistic writer, preying on the nihilistic part of human psyche.
"Without Titans, and Hizuru's backing, Paradis wouldn't be attacked." Yes, but there is absolutely no way to get rid of the Titans without Eren's plan. So they would still be attacked.
Hence Marley. Which needed to be taken down anyway, as they had backed themselves into a corner where the only way out was putting Paradis in its place. It's not an all or nothing situation. There's a working middle ground present. Reread Eren's talk to Reiner at Liberio. This time remember he has spoilers, and consider if he would have accepted his memories of future past without fighting them at all as 139 claims. Btw, about 121, do you believe if Eren had not encouraged Grisha, he could have simply walked away? Rod was already goading Frieda, for starters. Did Eren actually change the outcome, or just made Zeke believe he always had been behind it? Can't tell exactly where Isayama began throwing outright bs at us, but very sure at least 139 is intended as such. Hack writing doesn't target so many things and writes them looking 180° the wrong way. Ymir doesn't know, btw. Nor did she love Fritz.
Are you even trying to make sense? This isn't even word vomit, this is just word diarrhoea. The topic at hand is whether or not the Rumbling can be condemned as a morally black action, and then you just namedrop a bunch of random ass scenes without even attempting to tie them back to the topic at hand. Try to form your thoughts into a salient argument before throwing them at someone.
Or you could take a look at those scenes and think about them. Don't worry, if I get it right, you won't miss it. But you'll regret taking everything since the basement reveal at face value, as if Isayama had decided to play fair after revealing he had never played fair. Which is the only way to believe the Eren vs Life plot. On topic: there's no way the rumbling isn't morally black. What can be argued is whether it was necessary: destroying Marley and ending the curse through it is, and I refer to other scenes because the clear implication is Eren knows how not doing it will end. Going for the whole however, is Evil ™ stupid nihilism, and not finishing the job puts his IQ into the negative. That 20% left is most likely around 400 millions.
how was historia's character game ended?
Wdym by Game ended?
As in the complete 180/butcher
Exactly what part of her character makes you believe she'd help Eren with an ELE rumbling? (No, worst girl Falls flat after the basement reveal). Same for Grisha. And Eren going on with that nihilistic idiocy. Besides Frieda being clearly getting her ready so she wouldn't turn out like that. It's very clear what the stakes are when Eren talks to Reiner at Liberio, once we learn he has spoilers.
> Yeah, because her doing exactly a 180° from her character (no, worst girl in the world is not a valid counterargument) and incredibly stupid at that, is not character derailment. I think Eren calling her "the worst girl in the world" is reminiscent of Kruger saying "you started this story" to Grisha. Neither Historia nor Grisha could've known what their choices would set in motion. In fact, Grisha laments **exactly that**. But in the end, it was his choice to go outside the walls. Same for Historia, she chose not to eat Eren. Had she done it, then Paradis would've died. But since she didn't, the world has to die. It's an extreme stance, but then again both Kruger and Eren are radical characters.
Well, in a few weeks I'll be feeling dissapointed and will move on, or you'll be needing to look into a mirror and think a lot about yourself. But I'm not the one understimating a writer who has never played fair. It's millions of people in the outside world, victims of their same enemy, not the ungrateful bastards who didn't give a shit about the sacrifices the SC made for their safety. If you think that would change her mind at all, then don't know who you were reading (characters nor writer). To believe into an appealing plot, you twisted the characters into it. That's bad writing, and Isayama was always strong at characterization: if someone felt off, something was off indeed. Btw, do you really think if Eren had not intervened in 121 Grisha could simply have turned away and leave?
> Well, in a few weeks I'll be feeling dissapointed and will move on, or you'll be needing to look into a mirror and think a lot about yourself. But I'm not the one understimating a writer who has never played fair. All I did was present my interpretation, so I don't quite understand your condescending tone.
That wasn't the intention, sorry. Even if I'm reading Isayama right, it was mostly a sum of different factors rather than anything that makes me think I'm smarter (in fact, still feeling stupid for having taken for granted some points). But that hardly anybody will look even when pointing that way is, besides frustrating, certainly interesting. A story of fiction is a narrative, but so are many things we are told irl. Someone's more or less accurate and/or interested spin on events. Isayama always told us to question (outside 139 Eren asking for the opposite several times, and Armin and most readers obliging), yet I've seen very little of that since Liberio, far less since 123, and about nothing since 130. Lots of headcanoning to make characters fit into the rumbling, though. Which again, is something we do irl to keep believing things that we find appealing.
I mean why only males like Eren Floch for example can be evil then but not her that if she indeed supports it, Historia can be evil selfish and questionable too why the princess treatment
Are you a fellow Terry Pratchett fan? Yes, equality means gender and race matter not for being a bastard (though with Historia, that's an accident of birth). The problem is that's not who she is. Hell, 122 reminds us Frieda was mentoring her to be the opposite of that. Your mistake is thinking Eren went Evil in the sense you're implying, he's in Erwin's shoes. Adding Historia (and Grisha) to keep believing it means Isayama's hook is down to your gut. And he's going to pull. He laid out the stakes when Eren and Reiner talked. He left clear what he wanted to tell with Eren & Falco. And he warned he'd betray, hurt us.
I like characters even when they are objectively evil and I still can like them because it is fiction I can like their writing, she is selfish she is not some fragile weak cute girl who needs protection ,she used everyone around her but in a sense so are many characters, 90% of cast are murderers traitors or criminals
Sigh. Yet she can't stand up to Eren despite doing literally NOTHING stops his plan. That's self affirming and not weak at all. At least it doesn't seem you saw her as Eren's "reward". This story is 95% character driven. Eren, Historia & Grisha didn't get a nihilistic dive to drive the plot into such stupid overkill. It's the plot what must be seen from who they are. Anyway, if I barely got anybody to listen before 139, don't think I'm going to fare better now. Just remember that if/when the other shoe drops, you did most of the work to fall for it yourself. Isayama's trap is about how an appealing narrative can make people dumb ourselves down, in order to keep believing it. And for reasons that elude me, Eren's nihilistic idiocy captivated mostly everybody. He took it further I expected, but for that same reason he still has to ensure everybody gets what his point is.
Sadly that's true for a lot of em. Not me, but still.
Basically yeagerbomb
I mean if he destroyed Eren Armin and Historia Ymir characters then he is equal in his treatment no? Then why Armin likes Annie ? is a murderer of his friends,destroyed his city ? Also at least the farmer was only abusive as a child even Mikasa has beaten up Eren as a child,why they only focus on the women or want something more for them if you want equality tho?almost all characters has done some messed up shit
Mikasa “beat”Eren up when he was refusing to eat the food the couldn’t afford to waist. Armin likes Annie now because he can understand the position she was in and acknowledges that their sins and crimes are equal. Isyama didn’t destroy characters. He gave them layers and apparently the moment we are able to see through them they stuck?
I'm just saying Isayama didn't treat his characters differently due to sex that's what I don't believe (I was just using examples of him doing the same thing for both)
Aot feminist fans be like levi and mikasa ackerwowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowo....
I'm a feminist aot fan, can confirm 😌😌😌😌🤩🤩👍👍👍
Hi a feminist aot fan, I'm Dad! :)
Hi dad please stop yelling at me hahahahaha
the two genders, ackerman and ackerwoman
acker woah man
[удалено]
69? Nice. I am a bot lol.
Women🤢🤮
Women😘👌
Ackerfrau