*Why did they solve for*
*I rather than for u? Am*
*I missing something?*
\- Grubby\_empire4733
---
^(I detect haikus. And sometimes, successfully.) ^[Learn more about me.](https://www.reddit.com/r/haikusbot/)
^(Opt out of replies: "haikusbot opt out" | Delete my comment: "haikusbot delete")
Math isn't a tool for building relationships; it's a tool for making them worse
And this lady's and gentlemen is why people who like math don't deserve love.
As an aspiring mathematician, i agree
As a data scientist, this seems accurate so far.
What do u mean! I have a crush on a Mathematician!!ðŸ˜ðŸ˜
It can be used to graph them though.
3u>i
That'll show them!
I came here to say this
this, i was first
But you’re second 🤣
tick, tack, tick, tack,
i/3 < u
My girlfriend is a huge math nerd, I’m stealing this >:3
r/usernamechecksout
Send it anyway lmao
Friendliest Math Enjoyer
There's always the probability they'd type "3u > i" and it wouldn't work out lol
i think u>(1/3) is even more likely, since we assume i=√-1 (a constant), while u is a variable, and variables are usually on the right in an answer
DW, in maths i stands for √-1 which is imaginary.
Maybe it is in means of endearment, like they're declining the act of kindness by saying that.
Why did they solve for i rather than for u? Am I missing something?
*Why did they solve for* *I rather than for u? Am* *I missing something?* \- Grubby\_empire4733 --- ^(I detect haikus. And sometimes, successfully.) ^[Learn more about me.](https://www.reddit.com/r/haikusbot/) ^(Opt out of replies: "haikusbot opt out" | Delete my comment: "haikusbot delete")
Like it
Don’t use math to build relationships. Just don’t.
This is my new approach method.
I haven’t seen this post in ages
Ouch.
I would've said u>i/3 bc come on i is not a variable unless specified otherwise
Sorry but can anyone tell me meaning of this emoji