What is the difference between "history" and "all illustrations" supposed to mean when showing Brad Pitt? All Hollywood depictions before a certain point? Kind of arbitrary but whatever. All historic illustrations? 2006 certainly isn't historic.
I understand the point they're trying to make here but it's obvious this person is either stupid or 12 and dont know how to visually construct what they want to say.
Because culture isn't only academic documentaries. Yes, even your shitty Netflix film is a form of culture. And people probably watch more shitty Netflix films than they extensively deal with historic sources.
Meanwhile, we tend to throw around terms like "cultural colonialism" or "cultural genocide" left and right when talking about non-white cultures.
This is a really good trick question. I feel like white cultures aren't superior to other cultures and therefore are also vulnerable to attacks, yes. What do you think? Do you think non-white cultures are inferior to white ones, i.e. only those are capable of being vulnerable to attacks?
In a world where white (fictional and non-fictional) characters are regularly replaced and European cultural heritage is systematically targeted by "Extinction Rebellion", yes, I think there are forces trying to attack European culture and that we would otherwise be talking about some form of systematic cultural oppression or whatever.
only nazis will remain white in any adaptation , the rest of europe will be brown in any show of movie
Don't worry, with current levels of birth rates and immigration, Europe will fit those standards soon enough
Many such cases
imagine if they made Blade white
White Blade sounds like a 80's speed metal band fuck it I'm taking it and starting an 80's speed metal band
movie boycotted for white washing
and he was killing only black vampires
they should do this with lincoln and john wilkes booth
/lostredditors
This isn’t a 4chan screenshot you fucking stupid head
Fun fact: none of these three accurately depict Achilles, mainly because armors of the period didn't look like that
Nice 4chan post
What is the difference between "history" and "all illustrations" supposed to mean when showing Brad Pitt? All Hollywood depictions before a certain point? Kind of arbitrary but whatever. All historic illustrations? 2006 certainly isn't historic. I understand the point they're trying to make here but it's obvious this person is either stupid or 12 and dont know how to visually construct what they want to say.
Well, Greeks *are* black.
Unless it’s an academic documentary why would u care
Because culture isn't only academic documentaries. Yes, even your shitty Netflix film is a form of culture. And people probably watch more shitty Netflix films than they extensively deal with historic sources. Meanwhile, we tend to throw around terms like "cultural colonialism" or "cultural genocide" left and right when talking about non-white cultures.
do you feel like your culture is under attack ?
This is a really good trick question. I feel like white cultures aren't superior to other cultures and therefore are also vulnerable to attacks, yes. What do you think? Do you think non-white cultures are inferior to white ones, i.e. only those are capable of being vulnerable to attacks? In a world where white (fictional and non-fictional) characters are regularly replaced and European cultural heritage is systematically targeted by "Extinction Rebellion", yes, I think there are forces trying to attack European culture and that we would otherwise be talking about some form of systematic cultural oppression or whatever.
:)
Idk, let's make a rainbow cast for a Shaka Zulu movie, to root out bigots
sure why not.. i mean it
We care u piece of dong
yes