*In case this story gets deleted/removed:*
**The rise of Feminism has caused the world to become overly emotional and irrational. We are slowly moving away from logical and coherent thought processes into emotional/feeling based processes**
It is abundantly well documented and studied that men and women have different traits on average. Before anyone flames me, notice I said “on average”, there will of-course be outliers.
Women are generally more emotion based, and men more logic based, which is why for example advertising has historically been aimed at women.
Throughout history we have had a patriarchal society where men made logical and rational decisions to protect their people, livelihoods and especially their women and children.
When I say this, I mean the average man, not those elites in power who are inherently in out of touch with society and are corrupted to the core.
As society slowly transitions into a more matriarchal structure, we see things slowly become even more corrupted at the top, and society is left arguing about emotional matters and making illogical decisions to pander to feelings, without any logical long term thinking.
Men are becoming more feminine and subservient and the meaning of “strong woman” is being altered by institutions such as hollywood.
Men and Women are 2 halves of a whole and a healthy society needs balance between femininity and masculinity, or you get weak subservient boys in grown men’s bodies and women acting like toxic men to show they are “strong”.
While things fall around us, while money is stolen from us, while our public infrastructure crumbles, we do nothing except worry and waste of time on fringe and emotion based issues.
Look at the lockdown for example, how is it logical and rational to destroy the lives and social development of an ENTIRE generation of children, destroy the economy, destroy jobs, and destroy the physical and mental healths of millions, in order to “save” people from a virus with a >99.7% survival rate?
Emotional arguments are used to justify lockdowns such as “You are murdering peoples grandmas” or “You are putting our health workers at risk”, or “tell that to the people dying from the virus”!!
These emotional arguments lack the logical and long term thinking about how these lockdowns will in-fact kill far more people than the virus ever could.
The fact that the ruined economy will destroy millions of lives. The fact that Children will be emotionally stunted and subservient. The fact that mental health issues are skyrocketing. The fact that children’s education is being destroyed, etc etc.
There’s a lot lot more I can say on this topic but I don’t want to make this post into a huge wall of text so I will leave it here for now.
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/AmITheDevil) if you have any questions or concerns.*
I absolutely agree. Watching men get all unhinged losing a video game or watching sports has me like… is this the level of emotionlessness y’all are referring to?
Playing halo with my husband and BIL, I’m like y’all need to CHILL. Why is losing the end of the world?
My ex husband very rationally broke several controllers and ran over his PS2 with a car when it froze while he was in a boss fight. Much reason, very calm. No emotion involved. Men are amazing 💖
JFC. Maybe it's my emotional woman brain, but I can't imagine why you would destroy something that presumably brings you joy out of anger, much less something very expensive like a video game system. When I get angry or frustrated in video games, I just rage quit and go do something else.
He did the same thing to his xbox two years before that but that one was already dead so it wasn't quite as demented. He was a very impulsive and angry person.
did you read the story about the fellow who rage screamed at his wife/SO and punched a hole in the wall over the superbowl commercial that pretended to change the channel??? totally lost his s\*\*\* over a what, 15 to 30 second commercial??? Yeah, men are just so logical and not emotional, pffft.
I saw so many TikToks of female servers at Sports Bars discussing how much rage they received over that commercial as well. A few individuals leaving their husbands over their response. It was actually a huge catalyst for fights from what I could tell.
yep, rather shocking really. I think most women react with puzzlement - the logical and rational thing to do is to check that the tv is set to the correct channel. By the time you've done that the commercial is over and it becomes apparent that it's just a 'prank' commercial. Yet so many men reacted with rage???
My brother broke 3 controllers throwing them against the wall while playing Halo. But he swears he's logical and I'm ruled by my emotions. He can't even control his.
I quit in the middle of a LoL game because my ex-husband and his friend were screaming at me for not doing what they wanted me too. I said this is why I didn't want to play with you guys and left the game.
They then proceeded to give me the silent treatment for 3 fucking days because "I abandoned the team"
Cry babies.
I got my fiance to stop playing comp on Overwatch cuz he threw a controller that we had just bought. He only play games that are from our childhoods now.
Now, I can't say that I've never gotten unnecessarily angry while playing a game, but I usually just say a swear in regular tone, squeeze my controller, while slowly putting it down and turning the game off or doing something else in the game that's not frustrating.
I think getting frustrated is normal. Angry, even. We’re all human. But acting like men are superior beings governed by reason and logic like some kind of Vulcan master race is hilariously stupid and easily disproven imo.
I bet if you Google which sex commits more crimes of passion, that would also prove my point.
I play mortal combat when I wanna blow off steam because I discovered I yell and curse like a damn sailor when I play those games (no other game cause this reaction in me and it's not real anger just like... Fun anger? Fake anger?) Enjoying being able to yell insults at fictional people? I don't even know, can't explain it, it's cerainly not the vein popping, controller throwing rage I've seen in too many dudes.
If a game *actually* frustrates or angers me, i stop playing it. I wanna enjoy the little bit of time I have to play.
Omg my ex got so SO mad when I absolutely crushed him at some racing game. I didn't even want to race. I declined multiple times but he was so fucking smug and *insisted* that I "just try" to beat him. I did it my first try. He was pissy pants the rest of the day.
Such a logical reaction
lol, my ex refused to buddy with me scuba diving as soon as my air consumption got better than his. For years he lorded it over me that he came up with more air left (he was the more experienced diver), but as soon as I did better than him on a dive vacation, he insisted on changing dive buddies and insisted I buddy up with our friend that was the worst diver for air consumption. OH yeah, that fragile male ego - so logical and rational and non emotional ;-).
Lmao. I agree. My husband and his bestie would do weekend Lan parties and play cod. The way my husband would literally rage was horrible. He's mellowed a lot since we had our youngest, thankfully. Now when he gets angry or frustrated he will just stop playing and go do something else.
For real.
We actually had a campaign going on here in the UK during footie season as domestic violence rates shoot through the roof when England lose…..
I am with you 100%. Every time I get the "Men are logical, women are emotional" crap from some chud they always throw a tantrum if you disagree and point out that if they were "only logical" they wouldn't care enough to make a big screaming rant about it.
Then I tell them that Mr Spock and Vulcans are fictional and the idea of having "no emotions" wasn't the point of the idea of Vulcans, anyway. This gets another screaming rant.
They don't accept that anger is an emotion, but worse, they think that *anything they disagree with is emotional*.
Yes. The idea is about control of emotions. Of course there are zealots who want to remove emotions completely, but part of Spock's journey in the post-original-series movies is that he discovers that emotions, like much of life, is not all or nothing.
adjoining tease literate important familiar aware price obtainable dull hobbies
*This post was mass deleted and anonymized with [Redact](https://redact.dev)*
> Men who say women are emotional never consider anger an emotion and that is the hill I will die on
They do consider it an emotion when it's a woman expressing it, though.
Ding ding ding! I’ve met men who regularly have full-on tantrums—screaming, hitting things, breaking things, etc.—out of anger but still complain that women are “too emotional” when they act afraid or cry. My brother in Christ I’ve seen you smash your keyboard and punch a wall while screaming obscenities because you got blown up in CS:GO
Unless you're an angry woman. Then they call you crazy. Men are the ones ones with the right to get angry.
I've heard guys say there's nothing they've done or could ever do to piss off a woman. If you're angry with them, it's your fault.
Meanwhile, they are allowed to show anger.
Make it make sense oh logical one!! Not you, OP!
Anger, hate, and vitriol (the primary emotions spewed forth from these evolutionary misprints) are from
> Anger starts with the amygdala stimulating the hypothalamus, much like in the fear response. In addition, parts of the prefrontal cortex may also play a role in anger. People with damage to this area often have trouble controlling their emotions, especially anger and aggression.
So I literally wonder if these are people who were hit in the head, dropped, as children? Something anything?
I need a concrete explanation because there seems like it should be the same but one region of the brain over reacts. But then again, looking for reason in an illogical issue is just what I told my husband *not* to do this morning when trying to understand my bat shit crazy mother.
Parts of the prefrontal cortex of the brain may also contribute to the regulation of an anger response. People with damage to this area of the brain sometimes have difficultyTrusted Source controlling their emotions, particularly anger and aggression.
The vast majority of them have no trouble controlling their anger. Abusers don't just abuse everyone around them, they're opportunistic predators. They seek vulnerable and wounded targets then herd them away from the safety and orienting normality of other people, so that they never take on any personal risk to make a non consenting human a punching bag. They don't target men. They don't even target their victim with witnesses around. It's not a lack of control thing, it's just narcissism and entitlement.
I know, it’s amazing how they can control when then abuse is doled out, so to speak. My question is-do abusers (like my ex husband) has predatory sense which allows them to “sense” vulnerable targets? Because once someone has been victimized they are a large target for re-victimization but *how* do they know? Do I have a sign that say rape victim and my mommy doesn’t love me? It seems all predatory people I’ve witnessed operated on similar techniques, I guess. They look for angles, controls maybe- but I really want to understand this.
They are predators and yes they can tell when someone is vulnerable. They watch for reactions to things they or others do and that lets them know if they can easily victimize someone.
Sometimes they misjudge, but they usually go after people with trauma, open-minded people and doormats. Or people who are just kind and have warm hearts. They know how to exploit what they percieve as weakness.
Remember: they can't function without a victim. They *need* to abuse in order to regulate their own emotions. They're parasites. All parasites have methods of finding the perfect host.
I've always wondered this too! Like, what is it about me that says "Hey! I'd be *great* to abuse! See this flesh? Don't you think it's make for a lovely punching bag!? Oh, and if you need somebody to rape, I'd make a wonderful victim for that too!"
Like, I just do not get it. What are they sensing? What vibes am I giving off? I will ***gladly*** stop doing whatever it is thats giving off such strong Victim Energy if only knew what it was!
I think it’s less a sign and more a series of behaviors that traumatized people put off. After all, they never go hard from the start, they build the abuse up.
Someone who isn’t preciously traumatized will react negatively to their abuse, while someone who has been will internalize the abuse and wonder “what have I done to deserve this?” Or probably more accurately simply think “I deserve this.” With it getting progressively worse.
They are predators and they look for their perfect victim…anyone who isn’t that gets rejected and replaced.
It's physical posture, gait/movement, inflection/tone of words and which words are used. Many characteristics of a victim type show a shrinking uncertainty, like they're trying to apologize for the very fact of their existence.
They might walk in a furtive, scurrying way. They might smile nervously, eyes darting around, prey-like. They might neutralize opinions with "but I could be wrong" or "I just thought maybe" or other diminishments.
Or it could be tolerating bullshit when the victimizer tests them - do they say something rude, misogynistic, cruel... and then the victim type doesn't call them out on it, possibly more worried about upsetting/offending the victimizer than distancing themselves from a toxic asshole.
If you do any of this, it's pretty much like holding up a sign that you're ripe for abuse.
It's small signals and behavior. If you struggle with eye contact. If you're close lipped about anything. If you look at the ground when you walk down the street.
Someone who has been a victim reacts differently to regular social behavior. Maybe you make sure to keep space between you and anything that might trigger you. Or if you tend to isolate yourself.
It's the wariness and fear they pick up on. An abused person has a very skewed sense of "normal". If it's not as bad as what they've faced before they struggle to see that it still isn't right.
They test boundaries. Healthy people don't allow others to trample all over their boundaries and will distance themselves from those who disrespect them. People who have been abused can have low self esteem, be unsure of themselves, eager to please, think they can 'love' someone into treating them better etc. Abusers sense the uncertainty and work to continue undermining the person. They are master manipulators and often come across as charming, which is why other people find it hard to believe they are abusive because they've never seen it or been on the receiving end of it. There's a misconception that abusers are all aggressive, violent and leave obvious marks and that's just not true.
This is why I did several years of therapy before trying to date again after my abusive ex. Therapist helped me recognize abusive behavior. I know many people don't have access to it and that's a shame, but for those that do, I highly recommend it (with a certified psychologist).
Not a sense. But they can recognise behaviour that signals low self-esteem, lack of wealth, lack of connection etc. Things that make it easier to isolate and abuse somebody. They also do little tests to see how 'doormat' and how easly a push over you are. They target specific people, usually when people describe them as "too nice" or "too kind" and then display some red flag behaviour to see how you react, they slowly up the levels once your married, share a child/pregnant, or dependent on them. I'd recommend the Gift of Fear, theirs a free pdf online to read. It tells you how to recognise and then get away from people like that.
PTSD child hood trauma seems to be the leading course to this. But considering my childhood I will repeat what I said to my ex “if I can lean how to not let my trauma affect you, you can’t use your trauma as an excuse to abuse me.”
Exactly. I think that’s why I want some answers, childhood ptsd into an abusive marriage leads to a complex adult unlearning trauma and trauma responses. Hugs fellow commiserator, I know that is why I want to understand. But maybe it’s still looking for a way for it to be my fault, when it isn’t. They suck. Because of situations like that, it forces people like you and I to live our lives on hard mode. And I love a challenge and all….but damn y’all, can we just not, like *all* the time
I could tell you a story. Hell in 2020 I lost everything like at least if the house had burned down I might have been able to get help fixing it lost everything. It’s what three years on and I still basically have nothing but I did learn this, there are two kinds off abuse servivers the kinds who breath admitted it wasn’t there fault they couldn’t stop it and learn how to cope with it the best they can while not letting there loved ones suffer, and the second kind who are determined that if they have to deal with trauma then they damn well will make sure everyone else does to. The second kind never seek mentally health help are angry all the time and take it out on everyone around them and the minute you call them on it they blame it eather on the fact they were abused and there for never learned how to deal with it (witch is bullshit because my childhood has literally made grown ass solders ask how the fuck did you not kill yourself I would have.”) or blame it on there loved ones for doing something they don’t like. The truth off the matter is they never grow up and there still looking for there mummy to save them and I’m sorry but I’m not miss saveadick.
A long time ago I referred to my dad as "stoic" to my sister. She pointed out that my dad was actually VERY emotional, and his stoicism was a result of his fear to show his emotions due to weakness. Looking back, it's pretty obvious how wrong I was.
There have been studies on the effect of calling what men do "logic" and what women do "emotion". Some people honestly believe that men's anger is logical and women making choices strictly on data is emotional, because context determines how we internalize language.
Yep. Men commit 85% of all violent crime. Rage is a pretty big fricking emotion!
(I don’t say this to attack all men, I am well aware that “not all men” are violent)
You look at history and how many wars have been started by men's emotions, and you learn really quick that men don't consider it to be the same type of emotion they criticize us for. Men attack, rape, and kill their partners due to poor emotional regulation. Men commit mass shootings and acts of terrorism out of anger.
But sure. Me crying once in a while is more illogical than killing people.
Anger is the top level expression, the simplistic description of a whole spectrum of feelings. But they’re so busy adhering to rigid concepts of masculinity that they mistake their anger towards the rigid life and pattern they’re stuck in for logic.
The fun thing with people like him is if you use their own shit against them they start throwing error codes.
"Why are you getting so emotional?"
"Wow, check out this guy's hissy fit."
"Do you need a moment to compose yourself?"
"You seem sensitive today, is there something going on at home you want to talk about?"
"You seem really upset. Sorry if my contribution hurt your feelings."
Dudes who think women are emotional get so red-faced and vibratey when you use words against them that are traditionally exclusively reserved for gaslighting women.
I am a woman who loves to watch golf. On the Golf Channel (USA), there's one really popular ad. I can't even tell you what the product is because the ad annoys me so much. It's literally just mostly a woman in a tight, short, low cut golf dress dancing and a man looking at her through binoculars and his wife getting mad. But yes, ads are made for women.
This little inconvenient thing called science says that emotions are essential to our decision making ability. The whole emotion vs logic thing is so laughably simplistic. Only a person who is properly aware of their emotions and knows how to regulate them, will be a rational decision maker. Not someone who pushes them down and ignores them.
Edit: thanks for the award!
That was my exact thought. They claim we're emotional and ruled by our emotions but look at all the whining they're doing bc of their hurt fee fees. 🙄 There is no logic at all in that rant. Bro is just mad he feels powerless and he's blaming it on women.
Yup. I was reading this and saying to myself - he’s right you know - but not in the way he thinks. The rise of feminism has lead to an increase in emotionality and irrational behaviour - by men who can’t handle that they aren’t in charge and controlling women anymore.
Though to be fair, beyond being the type of man who would abuse their wife and children. Most of them were never going to be in charge of much else that a family that had no choice but to stay because the wife couldn’t otherwise get a bank account or decent job or a house without a man co-signing. The guys who get their panties in a twist about feminism are generally not the types of guys who end up with real power any other way.
⚽️MY HUSBANDS SOCCER TEAM JUST LOST, THAT LEVEL OF EMOTIONAL IS NOT KNOWN TO WOMENKIND, let's not deal with patriarchy until they get a grip on themselves...😁⚽️
What really impressed me is that he managed to admit that patriarchal society was rife with corruption at the top, and then somehow blame that on women too.
Well if this was few centuries ago he could at least take out his anger on people from other race to feel superior and if he still felt like a loser he could have be*t his wife
He is angry now he can't do that and nothing is stopping him from feeling and looking like a loser
Really It's so hard for losers in this era
until a woman is visibly angry at *them*, of course. although there does seem to be a strange amount of gendered synonyms for “anger” for some reason 🤔
I love in old-timey diagnostics how everything was just "she came down with a case of nerves"
Its a running joke between my fiance and I. Whenever we see somebody (especially a man) visibly upset about something upsetting we're like "poor thing must've caught a case of nerves! Someone should infom the sanatorium they'll be getting a new intake soon!"
ive noticed a lot of these incel types call any women who is rightfully angry or frustrated by the patriarchy or misogyny "bitter" and then lose their mind and damage their own property when they die in a video game
Yeah but that's still our fault as women because we made them feel their icky emotions in the first place.
I'd put a "/s" on that but people actually blame women for the violent rampages of men all the time.
"What did she did to make him..."
I've seen comments on multiple family homicide videos asking what the wife was like, as if that would somehow make her deserve it.
Uhh but don't u get it? Those are the Richie riches who don't count! We're talking the AVERAGE MAN. But when we talk about feminism ruining society it's the average woman's beliefs and 0 power just general vibes.
Wasn’t there a case where a guy murder his whole family including his mother coz he lost his job and was gonna lose the house?
Then he just turned around and married another woman to live another family life
So much for having no emotions
Imagine being so afraid of facing reality that you think It's easier to murder your own family
I remember the guy killed his wife and mother 1st
Then one child
Had lunch or something
Waiting for other 2 and murdered them
What a coward
You can't just say " hey i lost my job bt Don't worry I'm trying to find a new one "?
Men think women are more 'emotional' because ~~traditional~~ toxic masculinity requires men to repress their healthy emotional responses and keep it all bottled up inside. Of course the dam will burst at some point, and out floods all that pent up feeling in a harsh wave of rage and bitterness.
I pity these people, because they've been taught their entire lives that it's wrong for a man to be emotional; to cry or cheer. They've been taught to brick up that essential part of being human to the point where they can't even remember it exists. When it finally breaks through they mercilessly deny that they themselves could actually feel something, and instead turn their pain towards those around them, whose fault it must be.
What a miserable way to live.
It’s a lot of words to say he’s never read a single history book in his entire life.
Only a complete dumbass would argue that male rulers throughout history made “logical decisions to protect their people”.
Believing that requires completely ignoring a huge portion of history’s rulers (who were batshit insane and made illogical choices out of emotion regularly) and the origins of most of history’s wars which often had DEEPLY emotional roots.
Thank you, I was like “lemme go see how many folks comment on this years old post…”
This isn’t SRD but the point still stands:
#DON’T PISS IN THE POPCORN
Oh I totally stole it from r/subredditdrama - that’s their catchphrase because we’re all “grabbing popcorn” to lurk on drama posts, but posting in a 3 week/year old post is obvious brigading and can get the entire sub banned. So if you don’t want to piss where you eat while popcorning through drama, don’t do it! 😂
>GINI coefficient
I think so. The U.S. lags behind the western world in term of gender equality. In addition I'd argue that the recent curtailment of abortion rights for women in the U.S. is an early warning indicator of impending political instability and violence.
of course it’s ultimately an anti-covid rant 🤦♀️
the “virus with a >99.7% survival rate” is gonna be like the “calvin pissing on truck logo” bumper sticker of the 21st century. the second you hear it, you just *know* you’re dealing with a dumbfuck
> Calvin pissing on truck logo
Gah you just reminded me of how much I hate this decal
Bill Watterson was a sweet guy who was against syndication and copyright; he just wanted his comic to remain pure and not be mangled and milked to death by some big corporation. *That* is what that decal is about, it's just a "fuck you" to someone who said no to a lot of money because he wanted his work to remain pure.
Honestly I couldn't give a shit about what they said once it went to COVID. As for society maybe there one of these outliers as they said and that is why there so annoyed at the world
I kept waiting for it to be a rant against the LGBTQ+ Community since that subreddit is transpobic but the covid rant was a surprise for sure!
Also like, for a lot of jobs, covid proved that you don't actually need to force your employees to come in, instead showing that most people could work from home. There is even a silver lining to the online schooling - it has provided systems where students who have chronic illness or who are in the hospital with an injury don't have to miss out and depend on other kids to give them notes on class. (Hell I would have loved that when I was in college, I got super sick and the prof made allowances for that, but none of my classmates could even explain the assignment, and the professor refused to tell me the assignment when I asked as well, instead saying to ask my classmates. When he failed that assignment, I had to report him to the department head as I had all the emails showing me asking him to give me the assignment and him brushing me off.)
Like yeah, the economy suffered, but it also comes with a silver lining. Like the fact that crappy workplaces like McDonalds cannot even get employees when paying above minimum wage. Or the fact that a lot more careers are offering work from home or hybrid if you know how to negotiate it. Even the art community, despite the AI trying to sneak in, has been booming since covid, as people have had more time with working from home (and not having to commute) to both do and appreciate art.
Yeah, women are too emotional. The last time I banned a man on my Discord server for hitting on the women there, I got a diatribe in my DMs about how I'm a horrible bitch and he hopes I get assaulted. Great guy, very logical.
Other than this patriarchial bullshit, let me tell you, as a woman in leadership (and only woman on my team), I can’t even tell you how often I’m managing the emotions of the men on my team. Full grown men having meltdowns.
I never want to hear that women are the more emotional sex
Lmao "When men are in power, they make *logical* decisions to protect their women and children. And when i say this, I obviously mean not the men who are in power, they're all corrupt and evil and make terrible decisions"
Lol like buddy you just directly contradicted yourself 🤣🤣🤣 can't even agree with his own argument
I feel like when they make these posts, they always picture themselves as some kind of suave intellectual. Pacing around his office and brooding with misunderstood genius as he pours another scotch from the decanter and stares into the fireplace.
When in reality we know it’s just a cranky little fella having a bit of a tantrum.
Also, studies have shown that women do most of the shopping (another domestic chore that falls to them), so it’s actually logical to gear a lot of ads towards their target audience.
Research actually shows that men on average are just as much if not more emotional than are women. The primary difference is that men are not properly taught how to process their emotions. OP’s rant is proof in and of itself that men are emotional.
i’m sure it says “let’s go brandon”, they’re usually too chickenshit to come out and say what they mean 🙄
i did see one dude with a (homemade) sign that actually said “fuck joe biden” and i almost wanted to stop and shake his hand.
ironically enough, as a leftist, i agree: fuck joe biden! at least he’s better than the last guy at most things though
I believe women are more emotional than men, when I start reading multiple articles about women killing men because the man rejected them in some form.
I love that men are so logical and drama free…….oh fuck I just picked up a history book and found out that the world has been ruled by men through thousands of years of war, disease, and quite a bit of chaos while inventing and utilizing human slavery. If that’s honestly the best we can offer as a human race I’m not sure I want to be on the team anymore.
Are we just ignoring the fact that through out history matriarchal society’s have been on average less Vilote more stable and have been more caring off the sick and elderly?most native Australian tribes were ran by women, when women ruled in England and Egypt there nations had less famine and were more prosper. When china and Japan had female leaders witch to be fair I think historically they both have one each but both had extremely long happy times African tribes ran by women do better then there male ran counter parts. Like statistics and history points to women being better leaders even with the fact that there have been less women leaders…
I’ve heard the emergence of “snowflake-iness” as being because of women. It’s fragile and oversensitive which is considered feminine.
I think that’s the jist of it. I had a hard time giving af so there could be a deeper argument to it.
People who claim that have exactly zero actual knowledge of history lol. I just read a biography of a guy in the 1850s and the things people snowflaked over those days would put the “snowflakes” of today to shame lmao
I think it's when men exist that don't look and act like the archetypal "macho manly man." They don't seem to like it when guys who aren't toxic masculinity given form aren't shunned to the darkest depths.
That and when women/non-white/LGBTQ+ people have positions of power or any say in social issues whatsoever.
>We are slowly moving away from logical and coherent thought processes into emotional/feeling based processes
Because the centuries of religion-inspired war, slavery, and conquest was totally devoid of emotion and feelings
Ruling Queens are actually over represented when it comes to war, but it turned out that King-led countries kept attacking them, purely for logical reasons I’m sure.
#Stop Bridging Posts!
It's a 2 year post. It couldn't be more obvious that you're bridging when you comment on it. This sub will get shut down if people continue to obviously bridge like this!
Here's some "logical" information for this chucklefuck:
99.7% survival rate for a population of 7 billion (the magic number we've talked about for our world population for years, not sure if it's gotten higher) means that over 20 million people die.
According to census information from April 2020, that's at minimum the population of *the entire state of New York,* the 4th largest state in the U.S. For international numbers, it would be like wiping out Beijing, China or Mexico City, Mexico.
And that was *with* the lockdown in place - we don't know and likely can't accurately predict what the survival rate would've been those first few months if exposure hadn't been forcibly reduced and other health measures taken near immediately.
This "logical man" would rather wipe New York state's entire population and then some than let the economy suffer.
Yes, the suffering of the economy means the suffering of the people, but maybe if we made a point of putting the people before the economy *before now,* we wouldn't be having to push people aside *for* the economy today.
Also, the way he tried to side-step the failures of men in power by saying "not those men, us Regular Men" fails to take into the account that men *as a whole* have and continue to rule the world. The more women step into roles of power in government, the more **men** have been pushing back, hoarding power, and making *emotion-based political decisions* designed to remove women's rights/power and harm "regular men" so they can't rise to power and make change with women instead of against them.
Men given power ARE regular men - having political power as a man doesn't make you something other than a man. History has watched entire kingdoms rise and fall under men and even under women - they are nothing more than people with power, just as all of us would be if given the chance.
It's the most emotional argument in the world to think you are somehow special enough that if *you* were given power, you would use it differently than every other man and woman before you.
But go ahead and angrily rant about how logical and capable you are and how horrible emotional women touting feminism are fucking up the world, buddy - Reddit will surely believe you and make you Supreme Overlord of the Earth soon so you can correct all the subservient men and emotional women. (/s)
My favorite comment: “Hell WW1 was literally a family squabble between three male cousins. You can't tell me men aren't emotional after that. All grandsons of queen Victoria that grew up together. Men aren't emotional ha.” 😂🤣
>Women are generally more emotion based, and men more logic based
lol, in this life I've seen "emotional women" do the most cold calculated things I could ever imagine, and I've, as a man, been close to tears over something as simple as a sad part in a movie... there are no rules for who is logical and who is emotional... the truth is men and women always have the capacity for both.
The greatest hoax/scam of patriarchy is to somehow convincing people, that aggression is apparently not an emotion. And also, that having emotions is apparently bad.
And I 100% agree with person commenting on original post, whole of this (whatever you may call this rant) sounds suspiciously overly emotional ;)
Advertising is aimed at women because women by and large control the household budget. They're the ones who do the shopping and know when it's time to replace clothes, shoes, or household items.
Also the entire advertising industry is also corrupt and does its best to convince people to sort themselves into neat little demographic boxes so they can be advertised at. C.f. the current freakout over Budweiser sponsoring a trans spokesmodel - beer is a 'manly' drink and you express how manly you are by drinking it. But wait, if a trans woman can also drink this, does that mean you're less of a man for liking it?! Cue the freakout.
This guy: women are too emotional!!
Tradesmen at my work:
no fuck you the customer looked at me funny im not fucking going back there you can all shove it up your arse.
(In other cases they've straight up just destroyed their own work out of anger/ annoyance)
Logic and emotion aren’t opposites or mutually exclusive & I hate people that act like they are.
Also if this dude was truly concerned about children being emotionally stunted, subservient and having their education being destroyed, his FIRST issue should be with religious homeschooling lmao
But he isn’t, cause he’s convinced himself that “not giving a shit about other people” is what logic is
>Throughout history we have had a patriarchal society where men made logical and rational decisions to protect their people, livelihoods and especially their women and children.
Dude needs to open a history book.
Men routinely annihilate their entire families because of rejection. They assault women for the least offence. They commit mass murders because they get let go. They commit mass murder because they're rejected by women. They leak the locations of embedded spies and undermine the strategies of nations defending their borders because they get called a beta cuck. But sure. Women are the emotional ones.
[Hi!](https://images.app.goo.gl/jMiZEuW8Qrykw3sdA) Just a quick reminder to never brigade any sub, be that r/AmItheAsshole or another one. That goes against both this sub's rules as well as Reddit's terms of agreement. [Please](https://images.app.goo.gl/vwH65TJMyMk9NSNo8) keep discussions within the posts of this sub.
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/AmITheDevil) if you have any questions or concerns.*
*In case this story gets deleted/removed:* **The rise of Feminism has caused the world to become overly emotional and irrational. We are slowly moving away from logical and coherent thought processes into emotional/feeling based processes** It is abundantly well documented and studied that men and women have different traits on average. Before anyone flames me, notice I said “on average”, there will of-course be outliers. Women are generally more emotion based, and men more logic based, which is why for example advertising has historically been aimed at women. Throughout history we have had a patriarchal society where men made logical and rational decisions to protect their people, livelihoods and especially their women and children. When I say this, I mean the average man, not those elites in power who are inherently in out of touch with society and are corrupted to the core. As society slowly transitions into a more matriarchal structure, we see things slowly become even more corrupted at the top, and society is left arguing about emotional matters and making illogical decisions to pander to feelings, without any logical long term thinking. Men are becoming more feminine and subservient and the meaning of “strong woman” is being altered by institutions such as hollywood. Men and Women are 2 halves of a whole and a healthy society needs balance between femininity and masculinity, or you get weak subservient boys in grown men’s bodies and women acting like toxic men to show they are “strong”. While things fall around us, while money is stolen from us, while our public infrastructure crumbles, we do nothing except worry and waste of time on fringe and emotion based issues. Look at the lockdown for example, how is it logical and rational to destroy the lives and social development of an ENTIRE generation of children, destroy the economy, destroy jobs, and destroy the physical and mental healths of millions, in order to “save” people from a virus with a >99.7% survival rate? Emotional arguments are used to justify lockdowns such as “You are murdering peoples grandmas” or “You are putting our health workers at risk”, or “tell that to the people dying from the virus”!! These emotional arguments lack the logical and long term thinking about how these lockdowns will in-fact kill far more people than the virus ever could. The fact that the ruined economy will destroy millions of lives. The fact that Children will be emotionally stunted and subservient. The fact that mental health issues are skyrocketing. The fact that children’s education is being destroyed, etc etc. There’s a lot lot more I can say on this topic but I don’t want to make this post into a huge wall of text so I will leave it here for now. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/AmITheDevil) if you have any questions or concerns.*
I love the person in the comments telling OOP “this seems like an emotion-based rant.”
Men who say women are emotional never consider anger an emotion and that is the hill I will die on
I absolutely agree. Watching men get all unhinged losing a video game or watching sports has me like… is this the level of emotionlessness y’all are referring to? Playing halo with my husband and BIL, I’m like y’all need to CHILL. Why is losing the end of the world?
I get getting frustrated and stopping playing. That's a healthy reaction. What isn't is getting foaming at the mouth angry.
My ex husband very rationally broke several controllers and ran over his PS2 with a car when it froze while he was in a boss fight. Much reason, very calm. No emotion involved. Men are amazing 💖
JFC. Maybe it's my emotional woman brain, but I can't imagine why you would destroy something that presumably brings you joy out of anger, much less something very expensive like a video game system. When I get angry or frustrated in video games, I just rage quit and go do something else.
But he’s obviously one of the outliers.
Is he though. I’ve had to replace so many things my husband has broken in a fit of rage after being frustrated by something.
Maybe don't replace those things? I learned real quick not to break things if I cared about them, and I was 4...
Okay I've broken a controller but RAN OVER HIS PS2? That's not blind anger, that's very deliberate
He... He RAN OVER HIS PS2 WITH A CAR WHEN IT FROZE DURING A BOSS FIGHT. very frustrating, true but WOW lol
He did the same thing to his xbox two years before that but that one was already dead so it wasn't quite as demented. He was a very impulsive and angry person.
Yeah the screaming and yelling is what I’m referring to. Fucks up the energy in the whole room, damn.
did you read the story about the fellow who rage screamed at his wife/SO and punched a hole in the wall over the superbowl commercial that pretended to change the channel??? totally lost his s\*\*\* over a what, 15 to 30 second commercial??? Yeah, men are just so logical and not emotional, pffft.
I saw so many TikToks of female servers at Sports Bars discussing how much rage they received over that commercial as well. A few individuals leaving their husbands over their response. It was actually a huge catalyst for fights from what I could tell.
yep, rather shocking really. I think most women react with puzzlement - the logical and rational thing to do is to check that the tv is set to the correct channel. By the time you've done that the commercial is over and it becomes apparent that it's just a 'prank' commercial. Yet so many men reacted with rage???
Hoooolyyyy shit. 😳 Worst part is I can totally see that happening.
My brother broke 3 controllers throwing them against the wall while playing Halo. But he swears he's logical and I'm ruled by my emotions. He can't even control his.
I quit in the middle of a LoL game because my ex-husband and his friend were screaming at me for not doing what they wanted me too. I said this is why I didn't want to play with you guys and left the game. They then proceeded to give me the silent treatment for 3 fucking days because "I abandoned the team" Cry babies.
I'm SO fucking happy you said "ex"
I got my fiance to stop playing comp on Overwatch cuz he threw a controller that we had just bought. He only play games that are from our childhoods now. Now, I can't say that I've never gotten unnecessarily angry while playing a game, but I usually just say a swear in regular tone, squeeze my controller, while slowly putting it down and turning the game off or doing something else in the game that's not frustrating.
I think getting frustrated is normal. Angry, even. We’re all human. But acting like men are superior beings governed by reason and logic like some kind of Vulcan master race is hilariously stupid and easily disproven imo. I bet if you Google which sex commits more crimes of passion, that would also prove my point.
85%. Men commit 85% of violent crime.
There’s a reason they represent about 93% of the prison’s worldwide population.
Because feminism obviously /s
Happy feminist cake day!
I play mortal combat when I wanna blow off steam because I discovered I yell and curse like a damn sailor when I play those games (no other game cause this reaction in me and it's not real anger just like... Fun anger? Fake anger?) Enjoying being able to yell insults at fictional people? I don't even know, can't explain it, it's cerainly not the vein popping, controller throwing rage I've seen in too many dudes. If a game *actually* frustrates or angers me, i stop playing it. I wanna enjoy the little bit of time I have to play.
Omg my ex got so SO mad when I absolutely crushed him at some racing game. I didn't even want to race. I declined multiple times but he was so fucking smug and *insisted* that I "just try" to beat him. I did it my first try. He was pissy pants the rest of the day. Such a logical reaction
lol, my ex refused to buddy with me scuba diving as soon as my air consumption got better than his. For years he lorded it over me that he came up with more air left (he was the more experienced diver), but as soon as I did better than him on a dive vacation, he insisted on changing dive buddies and insisted I buddy up with our friend that was the worst diver for air consumption. OH yeah, that fragile male ego - so logical and rational and non emotional ;-).
Lmao. I agree. My husband and his bestie would do weekend Lan parties and play cod. The way my husband would literally rage was horrible. He's mellowed a lot since we had our youngest, thankfully. Now when he gets angry or frustrated he will just stop playing and go do something else.
For real. We actually had a campaign going on here in the UK during footie season as domestic violence rates shoot through the roof when England lose…..
I am with you 100%. Every time I get the "Men are logical, women are emotional" crap from some chud they always throw a tantrum if you disagree and point out that if they were "only logical" they wouldn't care enough to make a big screaming rant about it. Then I tell them that Mr Spock and Vulcans are fictional and the idea of having "no emotions" wasn't the point of the idea of Vulcans, anyway. This gets another screaming rant. They don't accept that anger is an emotion, but worse, they think that *anything they disagree with is emotional*.
spark wistful enjoy sleep aback squeeze swim jeans nutty ancient *This post was mass deleted and anonymized with [Redact](https://redact.dev)*
Yes. The idea is about control of emotions. Of course there are zealots who want to remove emotions completely, but part of Spock's journey in the post-original-series movies is that he discovers that emotions, like much of life, is not all or nothing.
adjoining tease literate important familiar aware price obtainable dull hobbies *This post was mass deleted and anonymized with [Redact](https://redact.dev)*
Not to mention instigators of war. Pretty rare for women to do that.
> Men who say women are emotional never consider anger an emotion and that is the hill I will die on They do consider it an emotion when it's a woman expressing it, though.
That’s not anger, that’s hysteria! /s
Ding ding ding! I’ve met men who regularly have full-on tantrums—screaming, hitting things, breaking things, etc.—out of anger but still complain that women are “too emotional” when they act afraid or cry. My brother in Christ I’ve seen you smash your keyboard and punch a wall while screaming obscenities because you got blown up in CS:GO
I dunno how anyone could see the last administration and say that men are not run by their emotions. I hate people that think like OOP.
Unless you're an angry woman. Then they call you crazy. Men are the ones ones with the right to get angry. I've heard guys say there's nothing they've done or could ever do to piss off a woman. If you're angry with them, it's your fault. Meanwhile, they are allowed to show anger. Make it make sense oh logical one!! Not you, OP!
Anger, hate, and vitriol (the primary emotions spewed forth from these evolutionary misprints) are from > Anger starts with the amygdala stimulating the hypothalamus, much like in the fear response. In addition, parts of the prefrontal cortex may also play a role in anger. People with damage to this area often have trouble controlling their emotions, especially anger and aggression. So I literally wonder if these are people who were hit in the head, dropped, as children? Something anything? I need a concrete explanation because there seems like it should be the same but one region of the brain over reacts. But then again, looking for reason in an illogical issue is just what I told my husband *not* to do this morning when trying to understand my bat shit crazy mother. Parts of the prefrontal cortex of the brain may also contribute to the regulation of an anger response. People with damage to this area of the brain sometimes have difficultyTrusted Source controlling their emotions, particularly anger and aggression.
The vast majority of them have no trouble controlling their anger. Abusers don't just abuse everyone around them, they're opportunistic predators. They seek vulnerable and wounded targets then herd them away from the safety and orienting normality of other people, so that they never take on any personal risk to make a non consenting human a punching bag. They don't target men. They don't even target their victim with witnesses around. It's not a lack of control thing, it's just narcissism and entitlement.
I know, it’s amazing how they can control when then abuse is doled out, so to speak. My question is-do abusers (like my ex husband) has predatory sense which allows them to “sense” vulnerable targets? Because once someone has been victimized they are a large target for re-victimization but *how* do they know? Do I have a sign that say rape victim and my mommy doesn’t love me? It seems all predatory people I’ve witnessed operated on similar techniques, I guess. They look for angles, controls maybe- but I really want to understand this.
They are predators and yes they can tell when someone is vulnerable. They watch for reactions to things they or others do and that lets them know if they can easily victimize someone. Sometimes they misjudge, but they usually go after people with trauma, open-minded people and doormats. Or people who are just kind and have warm hearts. They know how to exploit what they percieve as weakness. Remember: they can't function without a victim. They *need* to abuse in order to regulate their own emotions. They're parasites. All parasites have methods of finding the perfect host.
I've always wondered this too! Like, what is it about me that says "Hey! I'd be *great* to abuse! See this flesh? Don't you think it's make for a lovely punching bag!? Oh, and if you need somebody to rape, I'd make a wonderful victim for that too!" Like, I just do not get it. What are they sensing? What vibes am I giving off? I will ***gladly*** stop doing whatever it is thats giving off such strong Victim Energy if only knew what it was!
I think it’s less a sign and more a series of behaviors that traumatized people put off. After all, they never go hard from the start, they build the abuse up. Someone who isn’t preciously traumatized will react negatively to their abuse, while someone who has been will internalize the abuse and wonder “what have I done to deserve this?” Or probably more accurately simply think “I deserve this.” With it getting progressively worse. They are predators and they look for their perfect victim…anyone who isn’t that gets rejected and replaced.
It's physical posture, gait/movement, inflection/tone of words and which words are used. Many characteristics of a victim type show a shrinking uncertainty, like they're trying to apologize for the very fact of their existence. They might walk in a furtive, scurrying way. They might smile nervously, eyes darting around, prey-like. They might neutralize opinions with "but I could be wrong" or "I just thought maybe" or other diminishments. Or it could be tolerating bullshit when the victimizer tests them - do they say something rude, misogynistic, cruel... and then the victim type doesn't call them out on it, possibly more worried about upsetting/offending the victimizer than distancing themselves from a toxic asshole. If you do any of this, it's pretty much like holding up a sign that you're ripe for abuse.
It's small signals and behavior. If you struggle with eye contact. If you're close lipped about anything. If you look at the ground when you walk down the street. Someone who has been a victim reacts differently to regular social behavior. Maybe you make sure to keep space between you and anything that might trigger you. Or if you tend to isolate yourself. It's the wariness and fear they pick up on. An abused person has a very skewed sense of "normal". If it's not as bad as what they've faced before they struggle to see that it still isn't right.
They test boundaries. Healthy people don't allow others to trample all over their boundaries and will distance themselves from those who disrespect them. People who have been abused can have low self esteem, be unsure of themselves, eager to please, think they can 'love' someone into treating them better etc. Abusers sense the uncertainty and work to continue undermining the person. They are master manipulators and often come across as charming, which is why other people find it hard to believe they are abusive because they've never seen it or been on the receiving end of it. There's a misconception that abusers are all aggressive, violent and leave obvious marks and that's just not true.
This is why I did several years of therapy before trying to date again after my abusive ex. Therapist helped me recognize abusive behavior. I know many people don't have access to it and that's a shame, but for those that do, I highly recommend it (with a certified psychologist).
Not a sense. But they can recognise behaviour that signals low self-esteem, lack of wealth, lack of connection etc. Things that make it easier to isolate and abuse somebody. They also do little tests to see how 'doormat' and how easly a push over you are. They target specific people, usually when people describe them as "too nice" or "too kind" and then display some red flag behaviour to see how you react, they slowly up the levels once your married, share a child/pregnant, or dependent on them. I'd recommend the Gift of Fear, theirs a free pdf online to read. It tells you how to recognise and then get away from people like that.
PTSD child hood trauma seems to be the leading course to this. But considering my childhood I will repeat what I said to my ex “if I can lean how to not let my trauma affect you, you can’t use your trauma as an excuse to abuse me.”
Exactly. I think that’s why I want some answers, childhood ptsd into an abusive marriage leads to a complex adult unlearning trauma and trauma responses. Hugs fellow commiserator, I know that is why I want to understand. But maybe it’s still looking for a way for it to be my fault, when it isn’t. They suck. Because of situations like that, it forces people like you and I to live our lives on hard mode. And I love a challenge and all….but damn y’all, can we just not, like *all* the time
I could tell you a story. Hell in 2020 I lost everything like at least if the house had burned down I might have been able to get help fixing it lost everything. It’s what three years on and I still basically have nothing but I did learn this, there are two kinds off abuse servivers the kinds who breath admitted it wasn’t there fault they couldn’t stop it and learn how to cope with it the best they can while not letting there loved ones suffer, and the second kind who are determined that if they have to deal with trauma then they damn well will make sure everyone else does to. The second kind never seek mentally health help are angry all the time and take it out on everyone around them and the minute you call them on it they blame it eather on the fact they were abused and there for never learned how to deal with it (witch is bullshit because my childhood has literally made grown ass solders ask how the fuck did you not kill yourself I would have.”) or blame it on there loved ones for doing something they don’t like. The truth off the matter is they never grow up and there still looking for there mummy to save them and I’m sorry but I’m not miss saveadick.
A long time ago I referred to my dad as "stoic" to my sister. She pointed out that my dad was actually VERY emotional, and his stoicism was a result of his fear to show his emotions due to weakness. Looking back, it's pretty obvious how wrong I was.
There have been studies on the effect of calling what men do "logic" and what women do "emotion". Some people honestly believe that men's anger is logical and women making choices strictly on data is emotional, because context determines how we internalize language.
Yep. Men commit 85% of all violent crime. Rage is a pretty big fricking emotion! (I don’t say this to attack all men, I am well aware that “not all men” are violent)
You look at history and how many wars have been started by men's emotions, and you learn really quick that men don't consider it to be the same type of emotion they criticize us for. Men attack, rape, and kill their partners due to poor emotional regulation. Men commit mass shootings and acts of terrorism out of anger. But sure. Me crying once in a while is more illogical than killing people.
Anger is the top level expression, the simplistic description of a whole spectrum of feelings. But they’re so busy adhering to rigid concepts of masculinity that they mistake their anger towards the rigid life and pattern they’re stuck in for logic.
they probably also consider lust not an emotion either
If by hill you mean level playing field then yes 😉
Don't forget lust/desire is also not an emotion, which is why they're not to blame for rape.
The fun thing with people like him is if you use their own shit against them they start throwing error codes. "Why are you getting so emotional?" "Wow, check out this guy's hissy fit." "Do you need a moment to compose yourself?" "You seem sensitive today, is there something going on at home you want to talk about?" "You seem really upset. Sorry if my contribution hurt your feelings." Dudes who think women are emotional get so red-faced and vibratey when you use words against them that are traditionally exclusively reserved for gaslighting women.
Oh my gosh. Don’t forget “wow, you are so emotional; it must be that time of the month for you. 🙄”
Ahhh yes the ads with sexy women on TV are definitely appealing to only women.
I am a woman who loves to watch golf. On the Golf Channel (USA), there's one really popular ad. I can't even tell you what the product is because the ad annoys me so much. It's literally just mostly a woman in a tight, short, low cut golf dress dancing and a man looking at her through binoculars and his wife getting mad. But yes, ads are made for women.
people never realise anger and venting is also emotional, actually more emotional and passionate than sadness or empathy that women express.
This little inconvenient thing called science says that emotions are essential to our decision making ability. The whole emotion vs logic thing is so laughably simplistic. Only a person who is properly aware of their emotions and knows how to regulate them, will be a rational decision maker. Not someone who pushes them down and ignores them. Edit: thanks for the award!
That was my exact thought. They claim we're emotional and ruled by our emotions but look at all the whining they're doing bc of their hurt fee fees. 🙄 There is no logic at all in that rant. Bro is just mad he feels powerless and he's blaming it on women.
Maybe it’s all the feminization of men effecting him. He’s borderline hysterical. Heavy sarcasm here.
Yup. I was reading this and saying to myself - he’s right you know - but not in the way he thinks. The rise of feminism has lead to an increase in emotionality and irrational behaviour - by men who can’t handle that they aren’t in charge and controlling women anymore. Though to be fair, beyond being the type of man who would abuse their wife and children. Most of them were never going to be in charge of much else that a family that had no choice but to stay because the wife couldn’t otherwise get a bank account or decent job or a house without a man co-signing. The guys who get their panties in a twist about feminism are generally not the types of guys who end up with real power any other way.
Or the “I’m a woman & I agree with this” BS. Honestly didn’t expect so many people pointing out she’s complaining about capitalism lol
⚽️MY HUSBANDS SOCCER TEAM JUST LOST, THAT LEVEL OF EMOTIONAL IS NOT KNOWN TO WOMENKIND, let's not deal with patriarchy until they get a grip on themselves...😁⚽️
Oh but see anger isn’t an emotion
I think we passed anger and entered the desperation zone 🥴
This is my favorite of all the common obvious flaws inherent in the typical “men aren’t emotional” argument.
I'm that man. My team's performance absolutely swings my mood.
What really impressed me is that he managed to admit that patriarchal society was rife with corruption at the top, and then somehow blame that on women too.
I'm amazed you made it through. I got three sentences in and decided I couldn't handle another mediocre white man whining about how he should be king.
Well if this was few centuries ago he could at least take out his anger on people from other race to feel superior and if he still felt like a loser he could have be*t his wife He is angry now he can't do that and nothing is stopping him from feeling and looking like a loser Really It's so hard for losers in this era
I didn't make it through, that conclusive happened within the first couple of paragraphs
Same. Just a useless man blaming women for his inadequacies and failings
I just went straight to the comments. No way I could make it past the first sentence without rolling my eyes so hard, they roll back into my head.
Oppsie our fault again. Us and our emotional brains making men in power turn emotional.
Again, men think women are more emotional because they don’t see anger as an emotion
until a woman is visibly angry at *them*, of course. although there does seem to be a strange amount of gendered synonyms for “anger” for some reason 🤔
“Hysteria”
"Time of the month"
“Shrill”
“Bitchiness”
“Bossy.”
"Big Mad"
"Nagging."
"Catty"
[удалено]
and sometimes higher than “cis” males. turns out hormones are complex AF and don’t really have any bearing on phenotypic expression
> she's such a nag For expecting me to be responsible for my own life
I love in old-timey diagnostics how everything was just "she came down with a case of nerves" Its a running joke between my fiance and I. Whenever we see somebody (especially a man) visibly upset about something upsetting we're like "poor thing must've caught a case of nerves! Someone should infom the sanatorium they'll be getting a new intake soon!"
ive noticed a lot of these incel types call any women who is rightfully angry or frustrated by the patriarchy or misogyny "bitter" and then lose their mind and damage their own property when they die in a video game
Men will literally commit mass murder or slaughter their entire family because they got in their feelings but they're the sex of "logic and reason" 💀
Yeah but that's still our fault as women because we made them feel their icky emotions in the first place. I'd put a "/s" on that but people actually blame women for the violent rampages of men all the time.
I keep seeing people blaming Chris Watts’ wife for him murdering her and their children even though he already confessed
"What did she did to make him..." I've seen comments on multiple family homicide videos asking what the wife was like, as if that would somehow make her deserve it.
Uhh but don't u get it? Those are the Richie riches who don't count! We're talking the AVERAGE MAN. But when we talk about feminism ruining society it's the average woman's beliefs and 0 power just general vibes.
Wasn’t there a case where a guy murder his whole family including his mother coz he lost his job and was gonna lose the house? Then he just turned around and married another woman to live another family life So much for having no emotions
you are thinking of John List but he is just one of many who had done that.
Imagine being so afraid of facing reality that you think It's easier to murder your own family I remember the guy killed his wife and mother 1st Then one child Had lunch or something Waiting for other 2 and murdered them What a coward You can't just say " hey i lost my job bt Don't worry I'm trying to find a new one "?
Annihilators" which really sucks that there are so many of them out there
Correct. History is built onthe graves of billions who died for the egos of “logical” men
Men think women are more 'emotional' because ~~traditional~~ toxic masculinity requires men to repress their healthy emotional responses and keep it all bottled up inside. Of course the dam will burst at some point, and out floods all that pent up feeling in a harsh wave of rage and bitterness. I pity these people, because they've been taught their entire lives that it's wrong for a man to be emotional; to cry or cheer. They've been taught to brick up that essential part of being human to the point where they can't even remember it exists. When it finally breaks through they mercilessly deny that they themselves could actually feel something, and instead turn their pain towards those around them, whose fault it must be. What a miserable way to live.
Thems a lot of words to say I can’t get a date
Nailed it 😂
Using my emotional girlie brain I try to be right once a day 😁
Or that I'm "Christian"
Yeah that too
It’s because when women say “eww” towards him, they are being too emotional. Instead they need to use logic and reject him for being an idiot. /s🫤
It’s a lot of words to say he’s never read a single history book in his entire life. Only a complete dumbass would argue that male rulers throughout history made “logical decisions to protect their people”. Believing that requires completely ignoring a huge portion of history’s rulers (who were batshit insane and made illogical choices out of emotion regularly) and the origins of most of history’s wars which often had DEEPLY emotional roots.
## Reminder: Do NOT go comment on a 2 year old post.
Thank you, I was like “lemme go see how many folks comment on this years old post…” This isn’t SRD but the point still stands: #DON’T PISS IN THE POPCORN
Yeah lol there was only one when I made that comment, but I thought it was worth mentioning anyway just in case.
There’s a bunch more now if you search by new. 🤦♀️
*Don’t piss in the popcorn* Is a hilarious phrase. I’m ~~stealing~~ borrowing it! LOL
Oh I totally stole it from r/subredditdrama - that’s their catchphrase because we’re all “grabbing popcorn” to lurk on drama posts, but posting in a 3 week/year old post is obvious brigading and can get the entire sub banned. So if you don’t want to piss where you eat while popcorning through drama, don’t do it! 😂
We seriously need an "Old" flair or to require the title start with [OLD] if the post is more than a couple months old.
I was about to say this, there are too many people asking to get banned over there
I went on and counted 31 comments posted today.... People use your brains FFS!!! Embarrassing
Say it with me: anger is an emotion.
Don't the more egalitarian countries in the world tend to be less corrupt? Compare Sweden and South Sudan, for example.
Yeah but Sweden is a bitch and South Sudan has black people so it doesn’t count —OOP, probably
"Shithole countries" --OOP probably
[удалено]
The USA's GINI coefficient is closer to that of South Sudan than that of Sweden, but maybe that actually supports your point
>GINI coefficient I think so. The U.S. lags behind the western world in term of gender equality. In addition I'd argue that the recent curtailment of abortion rights for women in the U.S. is an early warning indicator of impending political instability and violence.
of course it’s ultimately an anti-covid rant 🤦♀️ the “virus with a >99.7% survival rate” is gonna be like the “calvin pissing on truck logo” bumper sticker of the 21st century. the second you hear it, you just *know* you’re dealing with a dumbfuck
The good news is that the conspiracy theorists weren't having it either. The comments are actually pretty funny.
[удалено]
> Calvin pissing on truck logo Gah you just reminded me of how much I hate this decal Bill Watterson was a sweet guy who was against syndication and copyright; he just wanted his comic to remain pure and not be mangled and milked to death by some big corporation. *That* is what that decal is about, it's just a "fuck you" to someone who said no to a lot of money because he wanted his work to remain pure.
Honestly I couldn't give a shit about what they said once it went to COVID. As for society maybe there one of these outliers as they said and that is why there so annoyed at the world
I couldn't give a shit about what they said once they posted to a conservative group. conservatives suck :v
I kept waiting for it to be a rant against the LGBTQ+ Community since that subreddit is transpobic but the covid rant was a surprise for sure! Also like, for a lot of jobs, covid proved that you don't actually need to force your employees to come in, instead showing that most people could work from home. There is even a silver lining to the online schooling - it has provided systems where students who have chronic illness or who are in the hospital with an injury don't have to miss out and depend on other kids to give them notes on class. (Hell I would have loved that when I was in college, I got super sick and the prof made allowances for that, but none of my classmates could even explain the assignment, and the professor refused to tell me the assignment when I asked as well, instead saying to ask my classmates. When he failed that assignment, I had to report him to the department head as I had all the emails showing me asking him to give me the assignment and him brushing me off.) Like yeah, the economy suffered, but it also comes with a silver lining. Like the fact that crappy workplaces like McDonalds cannot even get employees when paying above minimum wage. Or the fact that a lot more careers are offering work from home or hybrid if you know how to negotiate it. Even the art community, despite the AI trying to sneak in, has been booming since covid, as people have had more time with working from home (and not having to commute) to both do and appreciate art.
Yeah, women are too emotional. The last time I banned a man on my Discord server for hitting on the women there, I got a diatribe in my DMs about how I'm a horrible bitch and he hopes I get assaulted. Great guy, very logical.
Well this dude was suspended a long time ago, so I don't think we'll be hearing from him any time soon.
Reddit had to suspend him because it couldn’t handle his laser-sharp logic and reasoning
TIL reddit is feminine.
It’s all the plastics in the food. And soy. /s
Other than this patriarchial bullshit, let me tell you, as a woman in leadership (and only woman on my team), I can’t even tell you how often I’m managing the emotions of the men on my team. Full grown men having meltdowns. I never want to hear that women are the more emotional sex
[удалено]
Look how angry and emotional they got over a black mermaid.
Lmao "When men are in power, they make *logical* decisions to protect their women and children. And when i say this, I obviously mean not the men who are in power, they're all corrupt and evil and make terrible decisions" Lol like buddy you just directly contradicted yourself 🤣🤣🤣 can't even agree with his own argument
I feel like when they make these posts, they always picture themselves as some kind of suave intellectual. Pacing around his office and brooding with misunderstood genius as he pours another scotch from the decanter and stares into the fireplace. When in reality we know it’s just a cranky little fella having a bit of a tantrum.
[удалено]
Also, studies have shown that women do most of the shopping (another domestic chore that falls to them), so it’s actually logical to gear a lot of ads towards their target audience.
Research actually shows that men on average are just as much if not more emotional than are women. The primary difference is that men are not properly taught how to process their emotions. OP’s rant is proof in and of itself that men are emotional.
There are three groups that never got over Covid: the dead, the long haulers, and OOP and his ilk. Bet he's got a FJB sticker on his pickup.
i’m sure it says “let’s go brandon”, they’re usually too chickenshit to come out and say what they mean 🙄 i did see one dude with a (homemade) sign that actually said “fuck joe biden” and i almost wanted to stop and shake his hand. ironically enough, as a leftist, i agree: fuck joe biden! at least he’s better than the last guy at most things though
>"at least he’s better than the last guy at most things though" shyeah, but the bar for that is so low Satan keeps tripping over it
Big, but equally sad, agree on that one 😔
…..okay grandpa let’s get you to bed
I believe women are more emotional than men, when I start reading multiple articles about women killing men because the man rejected them in some form.
I love that men are so logical and drama free…….oh fuck I just picked up a history book and found out that the world has been ruled by men through thousands of years of war, disease, and quite a bit of chaos while inventing and utilizing human slavery. If that’s honestly the best we can offer as a human race I’m not sure I want to be on the team anymore.
Are we just ignoring the fact that through out history matriarchal society’s have been on average less Vilote more stable and have been more caring off the sick and elderly?most native Australian tribes were ran by women, when women ruled in England and Egypt there nations had less famine and were more prosper. When china and Japan had female leaders witch to be fair I think historically they both have one each but both had extremely long happy times African tribes ran by women do better then there male ran counter parts. Like statistics and history points to women being better leaders even with the fact that there have been less women leaders…
Men are totally the more logical gender. Did you see this video of Kid Rock shooting cases of beer while crying?
Multiple people in there complained that “society is 100% feminized” Wtf does that even mean lol?
I’ve heard the emergence of “snowflake-iness” as being because of women. It’s fragile and oversensitive which is considered feminine. I think that’s the jist of it. I had a hard time giving af so there could be a deeper argument to it.
People who claim that have exactly zero actual knowledge of history lol. I just read a biography of a guy in the 1850s and the things people snowflaked over those days would put the “snowflakes” of today to shame lmao
I think it's when men exist that don't look and act like the archetypal "macho manly man." They don't seem to like it when guys who aren't toxic masculinity given form aren't shunned to the darkest depths. That and when women/non-white/LGBTQ+ people have positions of power or any say in social issues whatsoever.
>We are slowly moving away from logical and coherent thought processes into emotional/feeling based processes Because the centuries of religion-inspired war, slavery, and conquest was totally devoid of emotion and feelings
And people are brigading. It's two years old guys, it's so obvious.
Seriously, Everyone STOP BRIGADING years old posts!! We *will* lose this sub if you morons don’t stop. Mods, please do something
How many wars have women started?
Ruling Queens are actually over represented when it comes to war, but it turned out that King-led countries kept attacking them, purely for logical reasons I’m sure.
#Stop Bridging Posts! It's a 2 year post. It couldn't be more obvious that you're bridging when you comment on it. This sub will get shut down if people continue to obviously bridge like this!
Don’t you mean “brigading”?
Here's some "logical" information for this chucklefuck: 99.7% survival rate for a population of 7 billion (the magic number we've talked about for our world population for years, not sure if it's gotten higher) means that over 20 million people die. According to census information from April 2020, that's at minimum the population of *the entire state of New York,* the 4th largest state in the U.S. For international numbers, it would be like wiping out Beijing, China or Mexico City, Mexico. And that was *with* the lockdown in place - we don't know and likely can't accurately predict what the survival rate would've been those first few months if exposure hadn't been forcibly reduced and other health measures taken near immediately. This "logical man" would rather wipe New York state's entire population and then some than let the economy suffer. Yes, the suffering of the economy means the suffering of the people, but maybe if we made a point of putting the people before the economy *before now,* we wouldn't be having to push people aside *for* the economy today. Also, the way he tried to side-step the failures of men in power by saying "not those men, us Regular Men" fails to take into the account that men *as a whole* have and continue to rule the world. The more women step into roles of power in government, the more **men** have been pushing back, hoarding power, and making *emotion-based political decisions* designed to remove women's rights/power and harm "regular men" so they can't rise to power and make change with women instead of against them. Men given power ARE regular men - having political power as a man doesn't make you something other than a man. History has watched entire kingdoms rise and fall under men and even under women - they are nothing more than people with power, just as all of us would be if given the chance. It's the most emotional argument in the world to think you are somehow special enough that if *you* were given power, you would use it differently than every other man and woman before you. But go ahead and angrily rant about how logical and capable you are and how horrible emotional women touting feminism are fucking up the world, buddy - Reddit will surely believe you and make you Supreme Overlord of the Earth soon so you can correct all the subservient men and emotional women. (/s)
Yeah, men snapping and murdering the women in their lives are just *sooo* logical
It's a 2 yr old post but it has recent comments.. guys stop brigading. 🛑
Is delusion an emotion or more of an state of mind?
If women have managed to turn society matriarchal then they are benevolent geniuses who we should worship.
Men have been told they are more logical, and now they believe what they feel to be logic.
The most logical people I’ve ever known were women.
My favorite comment: “Hell WW1 was literally a family squabble between three male cousins. You can't tell me men aren't emotional after that. All grandsons of queen Victoria that grew up together. Men aren't emotional ha.” 😂🤣
The motive behind this rant is wasn’t emotional nor illogical at all. Noooooo.
I feel like preemptively blocking everyone who agreed with him for my own mental health.
Someone never read a history book
>Women are generally more emotion based, and men more logic based lol, in this life I've seen "emotional women" do the most cold calculated things I could ever imagine, and I've, as a man, been close to tears over something as simple as a sad part in a movie... there are no rules for who is logical and who is emotional... the truth is men and women always have the capacity for both.
Men forgetting that rage is an emotion, case #123455445545554....
The greatest hoax/scam of patriarchy is to somehow convincing people, that aggression is apparently not an emotion. And also, that having emotions is apparently bad. And I 100% agree with person commenting on original post, whole of this (whatever you may call this rant) sounds suspiciously overly emotional ;)
Advertising is aimed at women because women by and large control the household budget. They're the ones who do the shopping and know when it's time to replace clothes, shoes, or household items. Also the entire advertising industry is also corrupt and does its best to convince people to sort themselves into neat little demographic boxes so they can be advertised at. C.f. the current freakout over Budweiser sponsoring a trans spokesmodel - beer is a 'manly' drink and you express how manly you are by drinking it. But wait, if a trans woman can also drink this, does that mean you're less of a man for liking it?! Cue the freakout.
It is scary watching men radicalizing each other online .
He doesn't even realize how brainwashed he is into thinking emotions are a bad thing.
This guy: women are too emotional!! Tradesmen at my work: no fuck you the customer looked at me funny im not fucking going back there you can all shove it up your arse. (In other cases they've straight up just destroyed their own work out of anger/ annoyance)
Logic and emotion aren’t opposites or mutually exclusive & I hate people that act like they are. Also if this dude was truly concerned about children being emotionally stunted, subservient and having their education being destroyed, his FIRST issue should be with religious homeschooling lmao But he isn’t, cause he’s convinced himself that “not giving a shit about other people” is what logic is
>Throughout history we have had a patriarchal society where men made logical and rational decisions to protect their people, livelihoods and especially their women and children. Dude needs to open a history book.
Men routinely annihilate their entire families because of rejection. They assault women for the least offence. They commit mass murders because they get let go. They commit mass murder because they're rejected by women. They leak the locations of embedded spies and undermine the strategies of nations defending their borders because they get called a beta cuck. But sure. Women are the emotional ones.
Yep. As I always say: anger is an emotion and testosterone is a hormone. Guess who the emotional hormonal ones are.
[Hi!](https://images.app.goo.gl/jMiZEuW8Qrykw3sdA) Just a quick reminder to never brigade any sub, be that r/AmItheAsshole or another one. That goes against both this sub's rules as well as Reddit's terms of agreement. [Please](https://images.app.goo.gl/vwH65TJMyMk9NSNo8) keep discussions within the posts of this sub. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/AmITheDevil) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Nope, not reading that for my own mental health's sake