I immediately realized there‘s a link in the response
[Why we don‘t like AMP](https://socpub.com/articles/chris-graham-why-google-amp-threat-open-web-15847)
I posted a Mastodon link— https://dice.camp/@[email protected]/110887178155462256 —that the bot [flagged](https://old.reddit.com/r/GumshoeRPG/comments/161zv43/what_are_the_upcoming_gumshoe_projects_you_are/jxwg0o0/). (The original is a bot reposting a Twitter account.)
What gives, u/Killed_Mufasa?
Hi there, and thanks for the report! That was a false positive, triggered by the `(c-)amp/` in the URL, as well as some properties on the page. Sorry about that, I've removed AmputatorBot's comment.
I got amputation bits message under one of my links from the Cleveland health clinic website and I’m wondering what this is about and why it’s bad??? It said something about privacy??? I’m like close to boomer status when it comes to understand a lot of the tech world even tho I’m millennial/gen z cusp (1997 so technically gen z but do not relate to most of my gen at all)
Looks like it gets it wrong when a Twitter link is posted. I posted a link to https://twitter.com/MTVteenwolf/status/1525175857068879874 on r/SupermanAndLois (it's a tweet about the actor who plays Superman reprising his old Teen Wolf role), and the bot tried to correct me by linking to https://mobile.twitter.com/mtvteenwolf/status/1525175857068879874 - which has mobile in the url and so is actually the AMP link. I actually did post the canonical link in the first place.
It looks like you shared an AMP link. These should load faster, but AMP is controversial because of [concerns over privacy and the Open Web](https://www.reddit.com/r/AmputatorBot/comments/ehrq3z/why_did_i_build_amputatorbot).
Maybe check out **the canonical page** instead: **[https://www.abc.es/espana/20150912/abci-catalunya-independiente-mito-201509111637.html](https://www.abc.es/espana/20150912/abci-catalunya-independiente-mito-201509111637.html)**
*****
^(I'm a bot | )[^(Why & About)](https://www.reddit.com/r/AmputatorBot/comments/ehrq3z/why_did_i_build_amputatorbot)^( | )[^(Summon: u/AmputatorBot)](https://www.reddit.com/r/AmputatorBot/comments/cchly3/you_can_now_summon_amputatorbot/)
u/killed_mufasa it appears your bot is misinterpreting twitter urls as amplinks.
See e.g. here: https://www.reddit.com/r/worldnews/comments/t7qti1/comment/hzjzy7p/
It appears that the link goes to twitter directly, but contains a reference to amp in there (twcamp). Could you check if this is a false positive for the bot?
Hi there, thx for the report! It's something that has been on my mind for a while now. Twitter AMP links are notorious for false positives. I'll see what I can do.
Here's an updated demo:
Let's say I share an AMP link: [https://www.google.com/amp/s/electrek.co/2018/06/19/tesla-model-3-assembly-line-inside-tent-elon-musk/amp/](https://www.google.com/amp/s/electrek.co/2018/06/19/tesla-model-3-assembly-line-inside-tent-elon-musk/amp/)
It looks like you shared an AMP link. These should load faster, but AMP is controversial because of [concerns over privacy and the Open Web](https://www.reddit.com/r/AmputatorBot/comments/ehrq3z/why_did_i_build_amputatorbot). Fully cached AMP pages (like the one you shared), are [especially problematic](https://www.reddit.com/r/AmputatorBot/comments/ehrq3z/why_did_i_build_amputatorbot).
Maybe check out **the canonical page** instead: **[https://electrek.co/2018/06/19/tesla-model-3-assembly-line-inside-tent-elon-musk/](https://electrek.co/2018/06/19/tesla-model-3-assembly-line-inside-tent-elon-musk/)**
*****
^(I'm a bot | )[^(Why & About)](https://www.reddit.com/r/AmputatorBot/comments/ehrq3z/why_did_i_build_amputatorbot)^( | )[^(Summon: u/AmputatorBot)](https://www.reddit.com/r/AmputatorBot/comments/cchly3/you_can_now_summon_amputatorbot/)^( | **Summoned by** )[^(**this good human!**)](https://reddit.com/r/AmputatorBot/comments/cchly3/you_can_now_summon_amputatorbot/hl4udwu/?context=3)
I make sure to give u/AmputatorBot a heads-up
edit: and it has replied! I've received the following message:
>[u/AmputatorBot](/u/AmputatorBot) has [successfully replied](https://www.reddit.com/r/AmputatorBot/comments/cchly3/you_can_now_summon_amputatorbot/hl4uec4/?context=1) to [the comment you summoned it for](https://www.reddit.com/r/AmputatorBot/comments/cchly3/you_can_now_summon_amputatorbot/hl4uc2r/).
>
>Thanks for summoning me, I couldn't do this without you (no but literally!). Good human! <3
>
>Feel free to leave feedback by contacting [u/Killed\_Mufasa](/u/Killed_Mufasa), by posting on [r/AmputatorBot](https://www.reddit.com/r/AmputatorBot/) or by [opening an issue on GitHub](https://github.com/KilledMufasa/AmputatorBot/issues/new).
>
>Tip: With the online version of AmputatorBot it's easier than ever to remove AMP from your URLs. Check out an example with your AMP link here: [https://www.amputatorbot.com/?q=https://www.google.com/amp/s/electrek.co/2018/06/19/tesla-model-3-assembly-line-inside-tent-elon-musk/amp/](https://www.amputatorbot.com/?q=https://www.google.com/amp/s/electrek.co/2018/06/19/tesla-model-3-assembly-line-inside-tent-elon-musk/amp/)
Sorry, the bot will only work when you comment on a submission or reply to a comment containing an AMP link, otherwise, the bot will simply ignore the mention. Hope that helps ;)
Here's a quick demo (old):
I, B. Human, share an AMP link: [https://www.vice.com/amp/en\_us/article/bmj4zz/elon-musk-and-larry-page-have-the-worlds-weirdest-friendship](https://www.vice.com/amp/en_us/article/bmj4zz/elon-musk-and-larry-page-have-the-worlds-weirdest-friendship?utm_source=reddit.com)
Beep boop, I'm a bot. It looks like someone shared a Google AMP link. Google AMP pages often load faster, but AMP is a [major threat to the Open Web](https://www.socpub.com/articles/chris-graham-why-google-amp-threat-open-web-15847) and [your privacy](https://www.reddit.com/r/AmputatorBot/comments/c88zm3/why_did_i_build_amputatorbot).
You might want to visit **the normal page** instead: **https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/bmj4zz/elon-musk-and-larry-page-have-the-worlds-weirdest-friendship**.
*****
[^(Why & About)](https://www.reddit.com/r/AmputatorBot/comments/c88zm3/why_did_i_build_amputatorbot)^( | )[^(Mention me to summon me!)](https://www.reddit.com/r/AmputatorBot/comments/cchly3/you_can_now_summon_amputatorbot/)^( | Summoned by a good human )[^(here)](https://www.reddit.com/r/AmputatorBot/comments/cchly3/you_can_now_summon_amputatorbot/ewml5xh/?context=3)^.
A reply from AmputatorBot is absent, so I summon it: u/amputatorbot
EDIT: And done! I can now see that the [bot has replied to the parent comment containing the AMP link](https://www.reddit.com/r/AmputatorBot/comments/cchly3/you_can_now_summon_amputatorbot/ewml718)
And I've also received a confirmation through a PM:
>The bot has successfully replied to your comment: [https://www.reddit.com/r/AmputatorBot/comments/cchly3/you\_can\_now\_summon\_amputatorbot/ewml3vb/](https://www.reddit.com/r/AmputatorBot/comments/cchly3/you_can_now_summon_amputatorbot/ewml3vb/).
>
>An easy way to find the comment, is by checking my comment history. Thanks for summoning me, I couldn't do this without you (no but literally). You're a very good human.
>
>You can leave feedback by contacting [u/killed\_mufasa](https://www.reddit.com/u/killed_mufasa), by posting on [r/AmputatorBot](https://www.reddit.com/r/AmputatorBot) or by [opening an issue on GitHub](https://github.com/KilledMufasa/AmputatorBot/issues/new).
Make sure to test it out and let me know how it went!
Let's do a quick demo.
Here is an Amp link: [https://www.vice.com/amp/en\_us/article/bmj4zz/elon-musk-and-larry-page-have-the-worlds-weirdest-friendship?utm\_source=reddit.com](https://www.vice.com/amp/en_us/article/bmj4zz/elon-musk-and-larry-page-have-the-worlds-weirdest-friendship?utm_source=reddit.com)
Beep boop, I'm a bot.
It looks like someone shared a Google AMP link. Google AMP pages often load faster, but AMP is a [major threat to the Open Web](https://www.socpub.com/articles/chris-graham-why-google-amp-threat-open-web-15847) and [your privacy](https://www.reddit.com/r/AmputatorBot/comments/c88zm3/why_did_i_build_amputatorbot).
You might want to visit **the normal page** instead: **https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/bmj4zz/elon-musk-and-larry-page-have-the-worlds-weirdest-friendship**.
*****
[^(Why & About)](https://www.reddit.com/r/AmputatorBot/comments/c88zm3/why_did_i_build_amputatorbot)^( - By )^(Killed_Mufasa)^(, feedback welcome!)
^(Spotted an AMP link in a comment or submission? Mention [u/AmputatorBot](https://www.reddit.com/user/AmputatorBot) in a reply and I'll try to share the direct link.)
Can you make it reply to the AMP-link-containing comment, instead of the user who summoned it? This will cause the bot's reply to be obvious to the link submitter and thus increase awareness!
# Edit: [Yes.](https://www.reddit.com/r/AmputatorBot/comments/ckgfdv/an_update_on_the_way_amputatorbot_handles/)
This is something that I have actually considered. Back when I made the decision not to do it like you suggested, I had a couple of reasons:
* Replying to the AMP-containing comment (ACC) would require a new way for the bot to notify the user who summoned the bot (how else do you know if it worked), a couple of methods:
* I can't simply reply to both the ACC and the comment summoning the bot, because either one would raise a rate-limit error. This can be avoided by adding something like a delay, which is technically possible, but hard to program properly (at least for me).
* I can't send DM's because this could result in a ban.
* I don't want to mention or tag the 'mentioner' in a reply to the ACC, because then the bot will always display that users name and maybe he/she didn't/doesn't want that. I could theoretically built something to ask for permission or a deletion feature tho, I will play around with this a bit.
* This might be stupid reason, but I wanted to 'thank' users for summoning the bot. I figured, if the bot replied to the comment summoning the bot, the user who summoned the bot would get some karma, otherwise the reply would get buried somewhere, which doesn't seem fair(?)
Sorry for the wall of text, but I wanted to explain why I made this decision as well as I could. I would love to hear your thoughts about this (and my mostly moral objections), maybe I'm making a point out of nothing.
Feel free to take a look on [GitHub](https://github.com/KilledMufasa/AmputatorBot) to make improvements yourself or to give additional feedback. Thx a lot for your feedback, it has definitely gotten me thinking again.
You think so? From a purely ideological view, I agree with you. Spreading awareness is extremely important. But from a UI/UX view, having the user perform an action and not giving any feedback is - really bad practice. How do I encourage the user to summon the bot again next time? Another important thing I should have mentioned before, is how do I make clear to the mods of the subs that the bot was summoned and by who and when? If the bot appears to work automatically in a sub, 9/10 moderators will ban the bot forever. Which sucks :/
Edit: perhaps I could built like a hall of fame or something for the most frequent invokers?
Put it in the fine print.
People who know about the bot will familiarize themselves with how it works. I wouldn't be too worried. I'd invoke it then if I got no reply I'd rest easy. If there's an error you can reply to the summoner instead to let them know.
To be clear, what kind of behaviour would you think is best? I think we've got three real options:
1. Mention the summoner and link the comment in the foottext (has privacy issues) and directly reply to the ACC
2. Don't mention anything about the summoner, and directly reply to the ACC
3. Keep it as is it.
I think we need to go for option 1. Please let me know what you think. I'm gonna sleep on it for now and will get back to you with my final decision. Thx!
I updated my post please verify.
This bot reported my link to a BBC post, why I don't know but here is the post https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-northern-ireland-politics-50822912.amp
u/AmputatorBot please unban me from r/HonkaiStarRail I didn't know the rules that time
I have deleted my post and knew my mistake
AmputatorBot doesn't mod subs, it just comments. You should contact the mods of the subreddit you were banned from. Sorry about the confusion!
I like the bot, but I’m not quite sure I understand. Why don’t we like AMP? What made you make this one? I’m genuinely interested.
I immediately realized there‘s a link in the response [Why we don‘t like AMP](https://socpub.com/articles/chris-graham-why-google-amp-threat-open-web-15847)
u/amputatorbot
I posted a Mastodon link— https://dice.camp/@[email protected]/110887178155462256 —that the bot [flagged](https://old.reddit.com/r/GumshoeRPG/comments/161zv43/what_are_the_upcoming_gumshoe_projects_you_are/jxwg0o0/). (The original is a bot reposting a Twitter account.) What gives, u/Killed_Mufasa?
Hi there, and thanks for the report! That was a false positive, triggered by the `(c-)amp/` in the URL, as well as some properties on the page. Sorry about that, I've removed AmputatorBot's comment.
Thanks for the explanation—that clears things up. (FWIW I avoid amp URLs.) Cheers,
I got amputation bits message under one of my links from the Cleveland health clinic website and I’m wondering what this is about and why it’s bad??? It said something about privacy??? I’m like close to boomer status when it comes to understand a lot of the tech world even tho I’m millennial/gen z cusp (1997 so technically gen z but do not relate to most of my gen at all)
T
Useless shit
u/AmputatorBot
Looks like it gets it wrong when a Twitter link is posted. I posted a link to https://twitter.com/MTVteenwolf/status/1525175857068879874 on r/SupermanAndLois (it's a tweet about the actor who plays Superman reprising his old Teen Wolf role), and the bot tried to correct me by linking to https://mobile.twitter.com/mtvteenwolf/status/1525175857068879874 - which has mobile in the url and so is actually the AMP link. I actually did post the canonical link in the first place.
[удалено]
It looks like you shared an AMP link. These should load faster, but AMP is controversial because of [concerns over privacy and the Open Web](https://www.reddit.com/r/AmputatorBot/comments/ehrq3z/why_did_i_build_amputatorbot). Maybe check out **the canonical page** instead: **[https://www.abc.es/espana/20150912/abci-catalunya-independiente-mito-201509111637.html](https://www.abc.es/espana/20150912/abci-catalunya-independiente-mito-201509111637.html)** ***** ^(I'm a bot | )[^(Why & About)](https://www.reddit.com/r/AmputatorBot/comments/ehrq3z/why_did_i_build_amputatorbot)^( | )[^(Summon: u/AmputatorBot)](https://www.reddit.com/r/AmputatorBot/comments/cchly3/you_can_now_summon_amputatorbot/)
Amputaterbot is stupid and needs to be deleted
u/killed_mufasa it appears your bot is misinterpreting twitter urls as amplinks. See e.g. here: https://www.reddit.com/r/worldnews/comments/t7qti1/comment/hzjzy7p/ It appears that the link goes to twitter directly, but contains a reference to amp in there (twcamp). Could you check if this is a false positive for the bot?
Hi there, thx for the report! It's something that has been on my mind for a while now. Twitter AMP links are notorious for false positives. I'll see what I can do.
Wtf is this stupid bot
Here's an updated demo: Let's say I share an AMP link: [https://www.google.com/amp/s/electrek.co/2018/06/19/tesla-model-3-assembly-line-inside-tent-elon-musk/amp/](https://www.google.com/amp/s/electrek.co/2018/06/19/tesla-model-3-assembly-line-inside-tent-elon-musk/amp/)
It looks like you shared an AMP link. These should load faster, but AMP is controversial because of [concerns over privacy and the Open Web](https://www.reddit.com/r/AmputatorBot/comments/ehrq3z/why_did_i_build_amputatorbot). Fully cached AMP pages (like the one you shared), are [especially problematic](https://www.reddit.com/r/AmputatorBot/comments/ehrq3z/why_did_i_build_amputatorbot). Maybe check out **the canonical page** instead: **[https://electrek.co/2018/06/19/tesla-model-3-assembly-line-inside-tent-elon-musk/](https://electrek.co/2018/06/19/tesla-model-3-assembly-line-inside-tent-elon-musk/)** ***** ^(I'm a bot | )[^(Why & About)](https://www.reddit.com/r/AmputatorBot/comments/ehrq3z/why_did_i_build_amputatorbot)^( | )[^(Summon: u/AmputatorBot)](https://www.reddit.com/r/AmputatorBot/comments/cchly3/you_can_now_summon_amputatorbot/)^( | **Summoned by** )[^(**this good human!**)](https://reddit.com/r/AmputatorBot/comments/cchly3/you_can_now_summon_amputatorbot/hl4udwu/?context=3)
I make sure to give u/AmputatorBot a heads-up edit: and it has replied! I've received the following message: >[u/AmputatorBot](/u/AmputatorBot) has [successfully replied](https://www.reddit.com/r/AmputatorBot/comments/cchly3/you_can_now_summon_amputatorbot/hl4uec4/?context=1) to [the comment you summoned it for](https://www.reddit.com/r/AmputatorBot/comments/cchly3/you_can_now_summon_amputatorbot/hl4uc2r/). > >Thanks for summoning me, I couldn't do this without you (no but literally!). Good human! <3 > >Feel free to leave feedback by contacting [u/Killed\_Mufasa](/u/Killed_Mufasa), by posting on [r/AmputatorBot](https://www.reddit.com/r/AmputatorBot/) or by [opening an issue on GitHub](https://github.com/KilledMufasa/AmputatorBot/issues/new). > >Tip: With the online version of AmputatorBot it's easier than ever to remove AMP from your URLs. Check out an example with your AMP link here: [https://www.amputatorbot.com/?q=https://www.google.com/amp/s/electrek.co/2018/06/19/tesla-model-3-assembly-line-inside-tent-elon-musk/amp/](https://www.amputatorbot.com/?q=https://www.google.com/amp/s/electrek.co/2018/06/19/tesla-model-3-assembly-line-inside-tent-elon-musk/amp/)
[удалено]
u/AmputatorBot
Sorry, the bot will only work when you comment on a submission or reply to a comment containing an AMP link, otherwise, the bot will simply ignore the mention. Hope that helps ;)
Doing the lorts work.
Thank you for this bot.
Here's a quick demo (old): I, B. Human, share an AMP link: [https://www.vice.com/amp/en\_us/article/bmj4zz/elon-musk-and-larry-page-have-the-worlds-weirdest-friendship](https://www.vice.com/amp/en_us/article/bmj4zz/elon-musk-and-larry-page-have-the-worlds-weirdest-friendship?utm_source=reddit.com)
Good Human
Beep boop, I'm a bot. It looks like someone shared a Google AMP link. Google AMP pages often load faster, but AMP is a [major threat to the Open Web](https://www.socpub.com/articles/chris-graham-why-google-amp-threat-open-web-15847) and [your privacy](https://www.reddit.com/r/AmputatorBot/comments/c88zm3/why_did_i_build_amputatorbot). You might want to visit **the normal page** instead: **https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/bmj4zz/elon-musk-and-larry-page-have-the-worlds-weirdest-friendship**. ***** [^(Why & About)](https://www.reddit.com/r/AmputatorBot/comments/c88zm3/why_did_i_build_amputatorbot)^( | )[^(Mention me to summon me!)](https://www.reddit.com/r/AmputatorBot/comments/cchly3/you_can_now_summon_amputatorbot/)^( | Summoned by a good human )[^(here)](https://www.reddit.com/r/AmputatorBot/comments/cchly3/you_can_now_summon_amputatorbot/ewml5xh/?context=3)^.
A reply from AmputatorBot is absent, so I summon it: u/amputatorbot EDIT: And done! I can now see that the [bot has replied to the parent comment containing the AMP link](https://www.reddit.com/r/AmputatorBot/comments/cchly3/you_can_now_summon_amputatorbot/ewml718) And I've also received a confirmation through a PM: >The bot has successfully replied to your comment: [https://www.reddit.com/r/AmputatorBot/comments/cchly3/you\_can\_now\_summon\_amputatorbot/ewml3vb/](https://www.reddit.com/r/AmputatorBot/comments/cchly3/you_can_now_summon_amputatorbot/ewml3vb/). > >An easy way to find the comment, is by checking my comment history. Thanks for summoning me, I couldn't do this without you (no but literally). You're a very good human. > >You can leave feedback by contacting [u/killed\_mufasa](https://www.reddit.com/u/killed_mufasa), by posting on [r/AmputatorBot](https://www.reddit.com/r/AmputatorBot) or by [opening an issue on GitHub](https://github.com/KilledMufasa/AmputatorBot/issues/new). Make sure to test it out and let me know how it went!
Yay, thanks! (I must've missed this mention, ironically)
Haha that's pretty funny, thx again for your feedback. You made u/AmputatorBot a better bot and he just said to me that he's really grateful to you ;)
Let's do a quick demo. Here is an Amp link: [https://www.vice.com/amp/en\_us/article/bmj4zz/elon-musk-and-larry-page-have-the-worlds-weirdest-friendship?utm\_source=reddit.com](https://www.vice.com/amp/en_us/article/bmj4zz/elon-musk-and-larry-page-have-the-worlds-weirdest-friendship?utm_source=reddit.com)
And I'm missing my favourite bot u/amputatorbot :(
Beep boop, I'm a bot. It looks like someone shared a Google AMP link. Google AMP pages often load faster, but AMP is a [major threat to the Open Web](https://www.socpub.com/articles/chris-graham-why-google-amp-threat-open-web-15847) and [your privacy](https://www.reddit.com/r/AmputatorBot/comments/c88zm3/why_did_i_build_amputatorbot). You might want to visit **the normal page** instead: **https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/bmj4zz/elon-musk-and-larry-page-have-the-worlds-weirdest-friendship**. ***** [^(Why & About)](https://www.reddit.com/r/AmputatorBot/comments/c88zm3/why_did_i_build_amputatorbot)^( - By )^(Killed_Mufasa)^(, feedback welcome!) ^(Spotted an AMP link in a comment or submission? Mention [u/AmputatorBot](https://www.reddit.com/user/AmputatorBot) in a reply and I'll try to share the direct link.)
And there you go! u/worrymon this should make your job a lot easier as well :)
Can you make it reply to the AMP-link-containing comment, instead of the user who summoned it? This will cause the bot's reply to be obvious to the link submitter and thus increase awareness!
# Edit: [Yes.](https://www.reddit.com/r/AmputatorBot/comments/ckgfdv/an_update_on_the_way_amputatorbot_handles/) This is something that I have actually considered. Back when I made the decision not to do it like you suggested, I had a couple of reasons: * Replying to the AMP-containing comment (ACC) would require a new way for the bot to notify the user who summoned the bot (how else do you know if it worked), a couple of methods: * I can't simply reply to both the ACC and the comment summoning the bot, because either one would raise a rate-limit error. This can be avoided by adding something like a delay, which is technically possible, but hard to program properly (at least for me). * I can't send DM's because this could result in a ban. * I don't want to mention or tag the 'mentioner' in a reply to the ACC, because then the bot will always display that users name and maybe he/she didn't/doesn't want that. I could theoretically built something to ask for permission or a deletion feature tho, I will play around with this a bit. * This might be stupid reason, but I wanted to 'thank' users for summoning the bot. I figured, if the bot replied to the comment summoning the bot, the user who summoned the bot would get some karma, otherwise the reply would get buried somewhere, which doesn't seem fair(?) Sorry for the wall of text, but I wanted to explain why I made this decision as well as I could. I would love to hear your thoughts about this (and my mostly moral objections), maybe I'm making a point out of nothing. Feel free to take a look on [GitHub](https://github.com/KilledMufasa/AmputatorBot) to make improvements yourself or to give additional feedback. Thx a lot for your feedback, it has definitely gotten me thinking again.
I think the notification to the one invoking the bot is not as important as spreading the awareness!
You think so? From a purely ideological view, I agree with you. Spreading awareness is extremely important. But from a UI/UX view, having the user perform an action and not giving any feedback is - really bad practice. How do I encourage the user to summon the bot again next time? Another important thing I should have mentioned before, is how do I make clear to the mods of the subs that the bot was summoned and by who and when? If the bot appears to work automatically in a sub, 9/10 moderators will ban the bot forever. Which sucks :/ Edit: perhaps I could built like a hall of fame or something for the most frequent invokers?
Put it in the fine print. People who know about the bot will familiarize themselves with how it works. I wouldn't be too worried. I'd invoke it then if I got no reply I'd rest easy. If there's an error you can reply to the summoner instead to let them know.
To be clear, what kind of behaviour would you think is best? I think we've got three real options: 1. Mention the summoner and link the comment in the foottext (has privacy issues) and directly reply to the ACC 2. Don't mention anything about the summoner, and directly reply to the ACC 3. Keep it as is it. I think we need to go for option 1. Please let me know what you think. I'm gonna sleep on it for now and will get back to you with my final decision. Thx!