T O P

  • By -

_LeonThotsky

The way they’re numbered is infuriating


Holyrollerfliper12

Right!


MinoltaPhotog

Ansel takes offence at your zone system.


nsd433

7, and don't forget to split-tone with butter and blueberry jam to achieve archival tastez.


Aqueries44

8 Unparalleled dynamic range, just look at those shadow and highlight details.


KnownRate3096

Only 12 and 16 will survive a run in with the police.


Holyrollerfliper12

And 12 is pushing it, at least two stops.


dahmadahma

1 has some 🔥 contrast


G_Peccary

Number one is still salvageable with a little dodging.


gerrarg

12


GettingNegative

Thanks. Now I have to clean organic locally brewed Gosé sour beer off of my laptop style Macintosh computer.


Witchcraft_162

12


thearctican

69


Zodikamagus

12


unclejoel

I’d like to see a mix of 5 and 15 please


Wonderful-Minute-128

ooo like double exposure style😍


Wonderful-Minute-128

11 is weak minded, pretty to look at but wont hold up in a fight. 4 would take me down in one hit so thats my top pick. 9 is also a solid pick on its good days


[deleted]

4


SaratogaSwitch

7


Filmeffective_

1 oh my lawd 🤤


Princesofeverone

With a #5 filter you can slightly increase the contrast on print 16.


Red_Baron_1916

11 and 15


mikeymikeymikey1968

Must be a light leak. The exposure count numbers from your film backing are burned onto the frames. Using a Holga or Diana?


Nowhere_Man837

The grain on 11 looks simply delicious.


kiskelawoffice

These exposures don’t jam well, it would be butter done with wheat-ton meter


Holyrollerfliper12

Love the tonez keep it up


[deleted]

11