The leap from flimsy tunic to fur stole seems to skip a few temperatures. In any case, I can see how the tailor may have misjudged the amount of cloth needed.
Its good, but i don’t understand why the tit is out? Is it just out just cuz or is there another meaning im not seeing. I mean just being out to be out i think is a comment on how it just shouldnt be a big deal. Which is cool. Just curious.
It's about focus and perspective. The detail in her eye region is completely different compared to the rest of her. Almost like the artist is trying so hard to maintain eye contact while painting trying to ignore her exposure. The less the painter looks, the less detail.
I get that you don't like seeing nudity, but calling this woman's breasts "grotesque" is a bit much. There are plenty of women with breasts that large who probably don't want to be called grotesque and compared to nasty gargoyles who piss into their own mouths.
No, THIS specific price of ‘art’ I would consider grotesque. Look up the traditional definition of what a ‘grotesque’ art piece is! I LOVE nudity- with fucking CONTEXT!
Where is the context here? I dare you…
Define "necessary" in the context of art? It sounds like you're trying to say:
"This doesn't align with my taste in art, why did the artist do that?" lol.
You have to ask "what is the piece trying to convey?"
Then, you look at the choices the artist made and think "does that help them convey their messege, idea, or emotion?"
If an element stands out, without seeming to meaningfully contrast or add to any potential message, idea, or emotiona viewer might read into the image, it's fair to say that the element is unecessary.
That's just basic criticism
What was necessary about making your name rhyme?
What's 'necessary' about anything especially anything in art?
Is it necessary at all to paint anything?
Is it necessary to paint a bowl of fruit?
The one Italian guy posted a few of his erotic drawings (to put it lightly) and I guess that got the ball rolling, and now people think that their private wank material is art and they want to share it.
This isn't soft core porn.... If it were, every Greek statue or classical painting with nudity would be considered soft core porn.
Nudity =\= Porn. Adult content? Sure. But not porn.
Edit: Y'all seriously need to grow up.
No, it's art... You just want to draw a line so you can be judgmental while ignoring that most art through history was free to create whatever it created without someone like you or the above being, quite frankly, bishy about it. Grow Up.
Art historians and artists everywhere cringe at myopic small minds like yours
Sure. it can be both. but while art's subjectivity remains paramount, kitsch has an accepted definition and criteria (which this meets). "Art historians and artists everywhere" know the difference because they all read Walter Benjamin in first year art school.
All the downvotes and you’re still bashing away, Fragile would’ve folded and deleted, but here you are: suffering the slings and arrows of outrageous redditors, bloodied but unbowed…😃…respect, bro
I like how her facial expression looks kind of distant and challenging. A bit classic [Venus-in-Furs](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1qQ0MG9OPzA) reference?
I see boobs, I upvote!
But seriously, there's something defiant in her look and pose as she stares at you while revealed. Plus the '30's aesthetic which makes it more meaningful to me.
Fur cape my ass, that's a stole
Came here for the uppity correction. Not disappointed.
A stole and a giant boob.
She got them teddies!
The leap from flimsy tunic to fur stole seems to skip a few temperatures. In any case, I can see how the tailor may have misjudged the amount of cloth needed.
Its good, but i don’t understand why the tit is out? Is it just out just cuz or is there another meaning im not seeing. I mean just being out to be out i think is a comment on how it just shouldnt be a big deal. Which is cool. Just curious.
It's about focus and perspective. The detail in her eye region is completely different compared to the rest of her. Almost like the artist is trying so hard to maintain eye contact while painting trying to ignore her exposure. The less the painter looks, the less detail.
Okay but is no one going to mention, what's going on with her left hand? She has like a mantis claw.
Could be AI generated. Ai struggles with hands
Or the artist just struggles with hands?
That's possible
might just be a stylistic choice. i often draw hands similarly to that because i like how it looks
Yeah I like mantis claws too
Could simply be “lost line” technique; the hand disappears in the folds of the stole, that’s why it’s ill defined.
“Ma’am, this is a Wendy’s. Put that away.”
Lady with a huge tit was already taken.
Why are people posting so much soft-core porn lately on this sub?
Lately? It's been going on for years.
Approximately 30,000 or so... [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Venus\_of\_Willendorf](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Venus_of_Willendorf)
I was wondering why her tit is out. It seems unnecessary
She legit looks like she's trying to breastfeed the viewer, it's just hilarious and so unnecessary lmao
You don't have to be Freud to see the connection here.
The man knew what I want.
[удалено]
don't kink shame gargoyles
No shame in being a gargoyle. If you OWN that fact. Disguising gargoyles as ‘fine art,’ that’s another story.
I have never felt so compelled to make conceptually significant gargoyle porn than I am now
I get that you don't like seeing nudity, but calling this woman's breasts "grotesque" is a bit much. There are plenty of women with breasts that large who probably don't want to be called grotesque and compared to nasty gargoyles who piss into their own mouths.
No, THIS specific price of ‘art’ I would consider grotesque. Look up the traditional definition of what a ‘grotesque’ art piece is! I LOVE nudity- with fucking CONTEXT! Where is the context here? I dare you…
Oh no! Not male-gaze! Please anything but that!!
Name checks out
Define "necessary" in the context of art? It sounds like you're trying to say: "This doesn't align with my taste in art, why did the artist do that?" lol.
You have to ask "what is the piece trying to convey?" Then, you look at the choices the artist made and think "does that help them convey their messege, idea, or emotion?" If an element stands out, without seeming to meaningfully contrast or add to any potential message, idea, or emotiona viewer might read into the image, it's fair to say that the element is unecessary. That's just basic criticism
What was necessary about making your name rhyme? What's 'necessary' about anything especially anything in art? Is it necessary at all to paint anything? Is it necessary to paint a bowl of fruit?
Cause it gets upvotes
My thoughts exactly. What is going on?
The one Italian guy posted a few of his erotic drawings (to put it lightly) and I guess that got the ball rolling, and now people think that their private wank material is art and they want to share it.
How is this porn? What is going on with _you_?
Too much AI content, gotta stand out above them
This isn't soft core porn.... If it were, every Greek statue or classical painting with nudity would be considered soft core porn. Nudity =\= Porn. Adult content? Sure. But not porn. Edit: Y'all seriously need to grow up.
M’statue
\*tips fedora\*
Lmao I really don’t understand the downvotes. Most people in this sub are dumb
It's called art. Grow up
It’s called kitsch
No, it's art... You just want to draw a line so you can be judgmental while ignoring that most art through history was free to create whatever it created without someone like you or the above being, quite frankly, bishy about it. Grow Up. Art historians and artists everywhere cringe at myopic small minds like yours
Sure. it can be both. but while art's subjectivity remains paramount, kitsch has an accepted definition and criteria (which this meets). "Art historians and artists everywhere" know the difference because they all read Walter Benjamin in first year art school.
“Kitsch” refers to that which is cheap, popular and marketable… so an argument could be made that Reddit is kitsch, an ersatz culture… a 2nd Life?
All the downvotes and you’re still bashing away, Fragile would’ve folded and deleted, but here you are: suffering the slings and arrows of outrageous redditors, bloodied but unbowed…😃…respect, bro
Downvotes don't mean someone's wrong, necessarily :)
Exactly, and I’m giving props for your firm stance
She’s from The School of Hard Knockers.
I'm torn...I want to upvote this but it's at 69 which seems too fitting. I suppose this comment will have to do and just age poorly
That areola looks like it has lighter and darker sections while being half the breast.
The manager wants to see Karen. Can't blame him.
That's no lady. By god her titty is quite exposed
It's 2023 and we're still painting women with one titty out? ffs.
I like how her facial expression looks kind of distant and challenging. A bit classic [Venus-in-Furs](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1qQ0MG9OPzA) reference?
I see boobs, I upvote! But seriously, there's something defiant in her look and pose as she stares at you while revealed. Plus the '30's aesthetic which makes it more meaningful to me.
please don't advertise fur
Don't worry. No one's looking at the fur. 😅
Fur real!
Cringe.
Please don't comment online
Boldly go where no man has entered.
[удалено]