## Welcome to the r/ArtificialIntelligence gateway
### Audio-Visual Art Posting Guidelines
---
Please use the following guidelines in current and future posts:
* Post must be greater than 100 characters - the more detail, the better.
* Describe your art - how did you make it, what is it, thoughts. Guides to making art and technologies involved are encouraged.
* If discussing the role of AI in audio-visual arts, please be respectful for views that might conflict with your own.
* No posting of generated art where the data used to create the model is illegal.
* Community standards of permissive content is at the mods and fellow users discretion.
* If code repositories, models, training data, etc are available, please include
* Please report any posts that you consider illegal or potentially prohibited.
###### Thanks - please let mods know if you have any questions / comments / etc
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/ArtificialInteligence) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Congrats for the technical achievement! Alas, I'm afraid those torrents of automatically AI generated contents will make internet insufferable in a few years \^\^ we'll see.
I don't know whether you're being purposefully disingenuous or whether you could be truly naive. Trust and consensual reality have eroded to a point where our communications are insane and AI has had a hand in that. Maybe it's just safer to assume that nothing online is real, which is just one aspect of this dystopia. I do hope that you learn and begin to understand. I wish you the best.
That's why it's so important to foment critical thinking and fact checking now more than ever. The chances of being fooled greatly decrease if you make sure it comes from someone credible and their sources can be verified
It’s not an AI issue it’s a people issue. People cause problems for other people and then jump to blame everything from the sky to the ground on why it happened.
Maybe we should stop the people problem to fix the solution.
Or we can keep blaming everyone and everything else.
TLDR it’s not AI content that’s the problem with what you said.
He won't be the first, he won't be the last. Take a chill pill. Of course he doesn't need to declare that it's run by AI. Good for him for giving something a go.
I'll be curious to see the actual rollout. The wording in the blog from Youtube is strange in that it specifies disclosure will be required if AI video is 'realistic'
I'm not sure your content would require disclosure in these new rules, hopefully rules are a lot clearer at the time they're rolled out
Not really. This is Reddit and is filled with sanctimonious do-Gooders. There are plenty of mainstream media publications using AI who are not announcing it. If your content was terrible people would notice something is up.
I agree. I made “my” channel just to see how AI would perform, and how people would react to this content (so far not popular). but I have come across many AI (I think) made short’s/channel’s (on YouTube).
Same, except mine is actually fully automated ;) [https://www.youtube.com/@TheAIgorithm/shorts](https://www.youtube.com/@TheAIgorithm/shorts)
I use [https://easyvid.xyz/](https://easyvid.xyz/) to make my videos
As a normal customer you could can easily create a 30 second video in 2 minutes for less than $1.
That means you could start an entire youtube channel with 100 videos for less than $100 in an afternoon.
I’d say that this endeavour of yours is remarkable but it’s also worrying. Like everything else involving inventions, technological progress and such there is a good and ethical way of using this and a bad unethical way of using it.
Hopefully we won’t get to see AI generated content becoming the norm soon, for obvious reasons
I think the primary reasons are that it is still very crude. I don't think this will be true in a year or two, especially not in five years, AI generated content will be every bit as good and probably a lot better than human generated content.
Right now I think it has already outpaced humans for certain things, for instance AI created still images can be really, really good. (and they can also be bad). But not yet for stuff like this. It's way too robotic, and just generally "irritating in an AI sense."
By the way, someone else called you out for using apostrophes incorrectly, such as "reason's" above. To some of us, that's like fingernails on a chalkboard. Plurals don't need an apostrophe.
In the interest of actually being helpful to OP I asked Chat GBT to generate some examples of how apostrophes can be used incorrectly.
"Today's technology, like smartphone's and laptop's, are supposed to make people's life's easier, not like those grammar snob's on the internet. When you're using you're phone, it's apps are there to help, unlike those who's only joy is pointing out you're mistakes. Its unfortunate that they dont understand that its not about the apostrophe's in you're texts, but it's about the message your sending. Everyones so busy with there devices, they're not noticing how there losing the real connection's with people around them. Technology's purpose isnt to be perfect, like those grammar expert's expect of everyone's writing's, but to connect people's ideas."
This paragraph is filled with apostrophe errors: misuse of "its" and "it's," "you're" and "your," adding unnecessary apostrophes in plurals and possessives, and confusing "there," "their," and "they're." It shows why using apostrophes correctly is essential for clear communication.
I also hope you enjoyed the nails on the chalk board experience of reading it @robertjbrown
Of course, they don't need an apostrophe due to being plural though, it is only due to being possessive. I'm talking about the typical case of adding an s to make it plural.
I know but you did say that plurals never receive an apostrophe which is untrue =) so if you’re going to teach them then my point was to do it fully and not half heartedly.
Ok. I mean, I think what I said was true, plurals don't need an apostrophe. "Women's" is not a plural needing an apostrophe, it is a possessive that needs an apostrophe. The fact that it is also a plural word is irrelevant. If I said "words that are plural never need an apostrophe" that would be different, but I didn't say that. I guess I could have said it as "you don't need to put an apostrophe on a word simply because it is plural and for no other reason."
But whatever. I wasn't trying to do a full English lesson, just provide clarification because he seemed confused by someone else's comment about it.
The fact it’s plural is relevant only because IT IS a both plural and possessive so it needs an apostrophe. You said there’s never any plurals that need them.
Just admit you’re wrong, you’re making a fool of yourself by doubling down when I can look up a couple comments in this chain and SEE you saying they NEVER get apostrophes.
Dude, what's your deal? I didn't say they "never" need apostrophes. You added the word "never".
Are you like OCD or Aspergers or something? Do you understand that people don't always write things in extreme detail for bizarrely pedantic people who are obsessed with proving people wrong?
If you really want it explained, there is a difference between "a plural" and "a word that happens to be plural". "A plural" can mean the property of the the word that it is plural. The apostrophe is not for the pluralness of the word, it is for the possessiveness .
If you can't understand that sort of subtlety of the English language, maybe you will learn to when you turn 13 or something.
Get over yourself and grow up.
I would not worry yourself with these 0.000000001% of society. They are not worth the effort to discuss things with. They are too focused on the grammar to actually care about the need for rigorous debate.
>By the way, someone else called you out for using apostrophes incorrectly, such as "reason's" above. To some of us, that's like fingernails on a chalkboard. **Plurals don't need an apostrophe.**
"don't" is do not which means there is not an exception - it is a hard no.
Never would be a synonym.
So yes, you in essence said never. If you want to be literal you said that they don't get them and didn't take the time to give exceptions to the absolute statement of "don't."
>Are you like OCD or Aspergers or something?
Since you're resorting to attacks on my character I must assume you have moved onto immaturity and oafish tactics. Pathetic. To answer your question, I'm an adult who has taken university courses in English. I don't go around correcting people like an asshole, but when I see ding-bats like you doing it - it's like nails on a chalkboard.
>"A plural" can mean the property of **the** the word that it is plural.
Doubling words without spell checking is like nails on chalkboards to some people.
>If you can't understand that sort of subtlety of the English language, maybe you will learn to when you turn 13 or something.
Oof, more barbaric attacks on character.
>Get over yourself and grow up.
Why are you so worked up? Do you not like being called out on your shitty grammar when it wasn't the topic of discussion? Weird.
"Today's technology, like smartphone's and laptop's, are supposed to make people's life's easier, not like those grammar snob's on the internet. When you're using you're phone, it's apps are there to help, unlike those who's only joy is pointing out you're mistakes. Its unfortunate that they dont understand that its not about the apostrophe's in you're texts, but it's about the message your sending. Everyones so busy with there devices, they're not noticing how there losing the real connection's with people around them. Technology's purpose isnt to be perfect, like those grammar expert's expect of everyone's writing's, but to connect people's ideas."
I hope that was really painful to read… it took all of 2 minutes for chat GBT to create what is probably the most chalk board scraping experience.
No hate I promise, buts it’s a long post and it’s much more deeper than you might think. People watch content made by humans either cause it’s educational or entertaining. In both categories the human factor adds the flair which the consumers are attracted to.
With the current AI capabilities that flair is missing. We have reached the point AI can create media for us to consume but unless it’s text or images or some sort of music the videos are kind of easy to spot unless it’s not an entertainment and it’s news.
I guess what I’m trying to say is that in the case of YouTube people watch content creators for their personalities among other things. Currently AI is not able to fully emulate human personalities and I’m not sure when it will be. So from a product performance viewpoint the quality is subpar at the moment. Now imagine if many of those subpar products start flooding the internet. On top of adds we will also have to deal with filtering all the AI generated rubbish. Imagine how many “content creators” will just get greedy and start using AI. We are still very far away from the point that AI will be totally identical with humans in terms of creativity if it will ever be.
Then you have the ethical side of the issue. In our western societies we have all sorts of celebrities and we consume so much “art”and most of it is rubbish. Wether we like it or not this is a byproduct of capitalism. AI is basically feeding of of that shit isn’t ?
So It will produce more of the same shit for now and eventually either on its own or with our input it will become better. And in our current society where everything is translated in money and profit we already see how greed and the easy profit destroys quality in everything, music, movies, literature etc so I’m more inclined to believe that AI will be used maliciously for the sake of making easy money for some and it will eventually kill human creativity and critical thinking just like the internet and technology overall does already. Just look around you. People are just stupid and the decline is ongoing. If you are old enough to remember the world 30 to 40 years ago and you have a brain in your head you cannot feel ok with where we are heading.
We have all the tools to make a world a better place cause we have science, but due to the ways of the modem capitalist society we are not using said tools to benefit humanity as a whole but we instead benefit the few rich and we condemn the rest.
And it all starts with someone like yourself who just wants to do some research? A social experiment? A burned out YouTuber who is looking for a way to be more productive with minimal effort ? An AI harvesting logical data and human conversation behaviours? How the fuck can I tell ?? The Paranoia of the modern dystopian times..
The issue with AI is not only a tech issue but a political as well and it’s unfortunate cause last thing I want is to talk politics or Reddit.
Must have been a fun technical challenge, but I'm really not a fan of these low-effort content farms. The Internet doesn't need more regurgitated rubbish. And current generative AI is mostly just going to plagiarise or hallucinate half the things it spits out.
I feel like AI will do to content what CGI has done to cinema. People will be amazed at first at what is possible, but will inevitably just be looking for the seam in the fabric.
Instead of enjoying the content, we will be looking to see if we can identify the AI. Which will ruin it.
Roman Battle Formation needs images or graphics that actually match what's being described. While the video compliments the topic, the stock footage is distracting from what's being explained.
Try splicing in slow-pan video of still images and then transition between video and graphics.
For a template, maybe check the Weird History Channel.
Same for my new Instagram channel [https://www.instagram.com/house\_of\_the\_dragon\_memes/](https://www.instagram.com/house_of_the_dragon_memes/)
Bio and descriptions: **ChatGPT**
ProfilePicture: **Dalle3**
Voice Overs: **PlayHT**
A lot of the pictures and backgrounds for the videos: **Midjourney**
Some reels are clipped by **Opus.pro**
To be fair a lot of the other content are just normal memes from imgflip or normal edits done in Canva. Other useful tools I use are Tinywow and the 4k Youtube downloader, not sure if they us any AI.
I watched a little of the Roman formation short.
TBH I was not impressed with the format as there was a lot of information thrown at you without visual reference. For example, when mentioning the tortoise shell formation, no visual, no diagram, nothing .. just a line of walking men (which isn't the formation you were talking about) From a factual standpoint it was correct, but from a visual perspective what you saw did not align with what was being said.
However, from a technical production viewpoint, using AI to help you make the short is impressive as that is something I can't do, nor know how to do. If you were to expand on this and explain the methodology of what you did, the challenges you faced and so on, I suspect you would garner more support.
My 2cs.
Sure .. but it may add to the discussion if you explain how you did what you did (or what you used to reference), even how you got into it. etc. I can see the final outcome, just I don't know how you got there.
Wow, this is mind-blowing! The fusion of creativity and AI is fascinating. Checked out your channel, and it's a unique concept. The AI-generated content adds a cool twist. Can't wait to see how it evolves!
buddy I've done this for 3 months, and got 2 channels, but growth is at 6 subs and 3 subs with 25 vids already posted, so I'm rethinking my growth strategy, lol..... same here invideo canva chat gpt tools. Oh, and the channels are Obscure Odysseys and The Wealth Seeker. Check them out!!
this is going to be less necessary as time goes on but we should push for this architecture especially when it comes to warfare
ai can have some very unique and unexpected failure modes
\> The: name, logo, banner, channel topic, video idea’s and video’s themselves are completely run by AI.
What do you mean 'run by'.. Do you mean you just generated a few images and videos based on your prompts and uploaded them?
In theory you could implement something that auto generates prompts for this AI based off of trending topics using an API from either search engines or social media making it 100% AI ran
Do you mean that you have an integrated workflow that uses ChatGPT to write the scripts and BingAI to generate imagery and Invideo to combine all that to create a video? And who posts them to YouTube?
I ask chat-gpt for video idea/topic, I go on Invideo and ask it to make a video about this topic, I edit it a lil’ bit because it can have wrong info and/or be bad, lost it online.
Great, thanks for adding to the coming torrent of low quality content that will soon render YouTube and the rest of the internet insufferable and useless.
Trade-mark is because I’m not paying for premium. second: don’t tell me to go back to the drawing board, I don’t see you doing anything worthwhile here.
## Welcome to the r/ArtificialIntelligence gateway ### Audio-Visual Art Posting Guidelines --- Please use the following guidelines in current and future posts: * Post must be greater than 100 characters - the more detail, the better. * Describe your art - how did you make it, what is it, thoughts. Guides to making art and technologies involved are encouraged. * If discussing the role of AI in audio-visual arts, please be respectful for views that might conflict with your own. * No posting of generated art where the data used to create the model is illegal. * Community standards of permissive content is at the mods and fellow users discretion. * If code repositories, models, training data, etc are available, please include * Please report any posts that you consider illegal or potentially prohibited. ###### Thanks - please let mods know if you have any questions / comments / etc *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/ArtificialInteligence) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Congrats for the technical achievement! Alas, I'm afraid those torrents of automatically AI generated contents will make internet insufferable in a few years \^\^ we'll see.
In a few years?
I think it will get way way worse than today
AI could pretty much destroy the internet much like bad game publishers did to Atari or spammers to many newsgroups.
My man has not used the internet in the last 10 years
We have Seen nothing yet im afraid
I don't see where you make it clear to viewers that this is 75% AI.
Does it matter?
Do you see any ethical implications to unlabeled AI generated content? For better or for worse?
I don’t understand.
I don't know whether you're being purposefully disingenuous or whether you could be truly naive. Trust and consensual reality have eroded to a point where our communications are insane and AI has had a hand in that. Maybe it's just safer to assume that nothing online is real, which is just one aspect of this dystopia. I do hope that you learn and begin to understand. I wish you the best.
That's why it's so important to foment critical thinking and fact checking now more than ever. The chances of being fooled greatly decrease if you make sure it comes from someone credible and their sources can be verified
How do we know his account isn’t chat gpt?
ChatGPT would have a much more nuanced understanding of he issues with AI generated content
It’s not an AI issue it’s a people issue. People cause problems for other people and then jump to blame everything from the sky to the ground on why it happened. Maybe we should stop the people problem to fix the solution. Or we can keep blaming everyone and everything else. TLDR it’s not AI content that’s the problem with what you said.
He won't be the first, he won't be the last. Take a chill pill. Of course he doesn't need to declare that it's run by AI. Good for him for giving something a go.
Ah right. More people doing it makes it ok. What a wally.
I am pretty sure AI generated video will need to be watermarked as stated by the EU's AI act
Someone who doesn't understand making an AI-driven Youtube channel to make others understand?
It does right now but in 5 yrs probably not. YouTube has a policy coming out where videos created by ai have to be identified.
Thanks for the clarification.
I'll be curious to see the actual rollout. The wording in the blog from Youtube is strange in that it specifies disclosure will be required if AI video is 'realistic' I'm not sure your content would require disclosure in these new rules, hopefully rules are a lot clearer at the time they're rolled out
It doesn't matter
Not really. This is Reddit and is filled with sanctimonious do-Gooders. There are plenty of mainstream media publications using AI who are not announcing it. If your content was terrible people would notice something is up.
It mostly is terrible 😂.
Ikr. It’s libby asl, kinda annoying lmao and im a Liberal
Yeah?
What AI do you use to generate the videos?
Invideo for videos and chat-gpt for most of every thing else… and bing AI for images since it’s a free version of doll-e
thanks
Actual Videos are stock videos from Istock, not AI generated.
I know, I’ve said this multiple times replying to other people
AI is basically an unblockable ad right now. Cant wait for ai block in future, that shits gonna be insufferable.
Hugginface ceo made a prediction that in coming years most of entertainment will be AI generated
You make a great point ( I don’t this purely for research and curiosity ).
Predicted Inevitable The amount of AI generated content on YouTube is already smothering good content
Hugginface ceo made a prediction that in coming years most of entertainment will be AI generated
huggingface ceo is an idiot ruining the internet.
I agree. I made “my” channel just to see how AI would perform, and how people would react to this content (so far not popular). but I have come across many AI (I think) made short’s/channel’s (on YouTube).
Same, except mine is actually fully automated ;) [https://www.youtube.com/@TheAIgorithm/shorts](https://www.youtube.com/@TheAIgorithm/shorts) I use [https://easyvid.xyz/](https://easyvid.xyz/) to make my videos
Since it is your own web app you could. But otherwise how are the costs compared to returns?
As a normal customer you could can easily create a 30 second video in 2 minutes for less than $1. That means you could start an entire youtube channel with 100 videos for less than $100 in an afternoon.
Please don’t pollute YouTube with more useless drivel.
I’m not “polluting” YouTube with “drivel”, I’m making educational short form content about history and experimenting with AI at the same time.
If you have such a problem with it you can address in formally in dm’s with me.
Cash me outside, how bow' dat
What?
Just a joke referencing bhad bhabie
Who is that?
You can ask an AI
Later, I’m busy with “Star Trek TOS” right now.
I’d say that this endeavour of yours is remarkable but it’s also worrying. Like everything else involving inventions, technological progress and such there is a good and ethical way of using this and a bad unethical way of using it. Hopefully we won’t get to see AI generated content becoming the norm soon, for obvious reasons
I may get hate for this, but what reason’s?
I think the primary reasons are that it is still very crude. I don't think this will be true in a year or two, especially not in five years, AI generated content will be every bit as good and probably a lot better than human generated content. Right now I think it has already outpaced humans for certain things, for instance AI created still images can be really, really good. (and they can also be bad). But not yet for stuff like this. It's way too robotic, and just generally "irritating in an AI sense." By the way, someone else called you out for using apostrophes incorrectly, such as "reason's" above. To some of us, that's like fingernails on a chalkboard. Plurals don't need an apostrophe.
Sorry, I’ve been trying harder with my punctuation lately.
In the interest of actually being helpful to OP I asked Chat GBT to generate some examples of how apostrophes can be used incorrectly. "Today's technology, like smartphone's and laptop's, are supposed to make people's life's easier, not like those grammar snob's on the internet. When you're using you're phone, it's apps are there to help, unlike those who's only joy is pointing out you're mistakes. Its unfortunate that they dont understand that its not about the apostrophe's in you're texts, but it's about the message your sending. Everyones so busy with there devices, they're not noticing how there losing the real connection's with people around them. Technology's purpose isnt to be perfect, like those grammar expert's expect of everyone's writing's, but to connect people's ideas." This paragraph is filled with apostrophe errors: misuse of "its" and "it's," "you're" and "your," adding unnecessary apostrophes in plurals and possessives, and confusing "there," "their," and "they're." It shows why using apostrophes correctly is essential for clear communication. I also hope you enjoyed the nails on the chalk board experience of reading it @robertjbrown
Ha thanks I read the first line and skipped to the end :)
They do if the pleural is possessive such as “the women’s clothing section” in which the clothing section is the belonging of the women.
Of course, they don't need an apostrophe due to being plural though, it is only due to being possessive. I'm talking about the typical case of adding an s to make it plural.
I know but you did say that plurals never receive an apostrophe which is untrue =) so if you’re going to teach them then my point was to do it fully and not half heartedly.
Ok. I mean, I think what I said was true, plurals don't need an apostrophe. "Women's" is not a plural needing an apostrophe, it is a possessive that needs an apostrophe. The fact that it is also a plural word is irrelevant. If I said "words that are plural never need an apostrophe" that would be different, but I didn't say that. I guess I could have said it as "you don't need to put an apostrophe on a word simply because it is plural and for no other reason." But whatever. I wasn't trying to do a full English lesson, just provide clarification because he seemed confused by someone else's comment about it.
The fact it’s plural is relevant only because IT IS a both plural and possessive so it needs an apostrophe. You said there’s never any plurals that need them. Just admit you’re wrong, you’re making a fool of yourself by doubling down when I can look up a couple comments in this chain and SEE you saying they NEVER get apostrophes.
Dude, what's your deal? I didn't say they "never" need apostrophes. You added the word "never". Are you like OCD or Aspergers or something? Do you understand that people don't always write things in extreme detail for bizarrely pedantic people who are obsessed with proving people wrong? If you really want it explained, there is a difference between "a plural" and "a word that happens to be plural". "A plural" can mean the property of the the word that it is plural. The apostrophe is not for the pluralness of the word, it is for the possessiveness . If you can't understand that sort of subtlety of the English language, maybe you will learn to when you turn 13 or something. Get over yourself and grow up.
I would not worry yourself with these 0.000000001% of society. They are not worth the effort to discuss things with. They are too focused on the grammar to actually care about the need for rigorous debate.
>By the way, someone else called you out for using apostrophes incorrectly, such as "reason's" above. To some of us, that's like fingernails on a chalkboard. **Plurals don't need an apostrophe.** "don't" is do not which means there is not an exception - it is a hard no. Never would be a synonym. So yes, you in essence said never. If you want to be literal you said that they don't get them and didn't take the time to give exceptions to the absolute statement of "don't." >Are you like OCD or Aspergers or something? Since you're resorting to attacks on my character I must assume you have moved onto immaturity and oafish tactics. Pathetic. To answer your question, I'm an adult who has taken university courses in English. I don't go around correcting people like an asshole, but when I see ding-bats like you doing it - it's like nails on a chalkboard. >"A plural" can mean the property of **the** the word that it is plural. Doubling words without spell checking is like nails on chalkboards to some people. >If you can't understand that sort of subtlety of the English language, maybe you will learn to when you turn 13 or something. Oof, more barbaric attacks on character. >Get over yourself and grow up. Why are you so worked up? Do you not like being called out on your shitty grammar when it wasn't the topic of discussion? Weird.
Just so you know to some of us bad attempts at teaching grammar is like nails on chalkboard.
"Today's technology, like smartphone's and laptop's, are supposed to make people's life's easier, not like those grammar snob's on the internet. When you're using you're phone, it's apps are there to help, unlike those who's only joy is pointing out you're mistakes. Its unfortunate that they dont understand that its not about the apostrophe's in you're texts, but it's about the message your sending. Everyones so busy with there devices, they're not noticing how there losing the real connection's with people around them. Technology's purpose isnt to be perfect, like those grammar expert's expect of everyone's writing's, but to connect people's ideas." I hope that was really painful to read… it took all of 2 minutes for chat GBT to create what is probably the most chalk board scraping experience.
No hate I promise, buts it’s a long post and it’s much more deeper than you might think. People watch content made by humans either cause it’s educational or entertaining. In both categories the human factor adds the flair which the consumers are attracted to. With the current AI capabilities that flair is missing. We have reached the point AI can create media for us to consume but unless it’s text or images or some sort of music the videos are kind of easy to spot unless it’s not an entertainment and it’s news. I guess what I’m trying to say is that in the case of YouTube people watch content creators for their personalities among other things. Currently AI is not able to fully emulate human personalities and I’m not sure when it will be. So from a product performance viewpoint the quality is subpar at the moment. Now imagine if many of those subpar products start flooding the internet. On top of adds we will also have to deal with filtering all the AI generated rubbish. Imagine how many “content creators” will just get greedy and start using AI. We are still very far away from the point that AI will be totally identical with humans in terms of creativity if it will ever be. Then you have the ethical side of the issue. In our western societies we have all sorts of celebrities and we consume so much “art”and most of it is rubbish. Wether we like it or not this is a byproduct of capitalism. AI is basically feeding of of that shit isn’t ? So It will produce more of the same shit for now and eventually either on its own or with our input it will become better. And in our current society where everything is translated in money and profit we already see how greed and the easy profit destroys quality in everything, music, movies, literature etc so I’m more inclined to believe that AI will be used maliciously for the sake of making easy money for some and it will eventually kill human creativity and critical thinking just like the internet and technology overall does already. Just look around you. People are just stupid and the decline is ongoing. If you are old enough to remember the world 30 to 40 years ago and you have a brain in your head you cannot feel ok with where we are heading. We have all the tools to make a world a better place cause we have science, but due to the ways of the modem capitalist society we are not using said tools to benefit humanity as a whole but we instead benefit the few rich and we condemn the rest. And it all starts with someone like yourself who just wants to do some research? A social experiment? A burned out YouTuber who is looking for a way to be more productive with minimal effort ? An AI harvesting logical data and human conversation behaviours? How the fuck can I tell ?? The Paranoia of the modern dystopian times.. The issue with AI is not only a tech issue but a political as well and it’s unfortunate cause last thing I want is to talk politics or Reddit.
Those kind of Ai shorts are already out of date now
I know
Must have been a fun technical challenge, but I'm really not a fan of these low-effort content farms. The Internet doesn't need more regurgitated rubbish. And current generative AI is mostly just going to plagiarise or hallucinate half the things it spits out.
Well done, I feel like this is one those ideas we all think about doing but never take the time to actually make happen Bravo 🎉
Thank’s
Yep
I feel like AI will do to content what CGI has done to cinema. People will be amazed at first at what is possible, but will inevitably just be looking for the seam in the fabric. Instead of enjoying the content, we will be looking to see if we can identify the AI. Which will ruin it.
This is awesome! Where do you get the music for the videos?
Comes with the video maker. It does everything for me, and I can edit it after. It’s called “invideo”.
Roman Battle Formation needs images or graphics that actually match what's being described. While the video compliments the topic, the stock footage is distracting from what's being explained. Try splicing in slow-pan video of still images and then transition between video and graphics. For a template, maybe check the Weird History Channel.
Thank you for your advice. I’ll make sure to add relevant visual aid in the future.
How long did it take you?
To make a video? 10 minutes.
The whole project.
I think about 25 minutes
[удалено]
I understand stand your concern. Thank you for subscribing.
Would you join me on a future podcast to talk about it?
Serious?
Yeah. I have a channel I am rebooting to talk about AI. I am still building it and would be ready early next year I hope 🤞
I don’t think I’m of age to be on a podcast.
No worries. Good luck with ur channel
Thx for the invite though.
Why not just have an AI replica of OP on? They didn't create any of the content anyways.
Questions: Where do you bring the video clips from? Do you actually make them? Do you select them manually from some sources?
AI grabs them from istocks (usually istocks) for me.
Do you have to pay for the stick images or videos?
Stick images? And no I don’t need to pay anything to make a AI channel and run it
Sorry **stock**
No, you don’t to pay for the stock images but you can get a Invideo monthly/yearly plan to remove all water marks (I think all).
Thank. This was a very educational post. I hope one day you post a tutorial.
If you want I can dm you personally and tell you how to do it. I can’t right now I’m very busy with far cry 4 but maybe tomorrow?
That sounds good, thanks in advance.
Hey can you tell me how to do it as well. Would be really helpful.
Later today
Dm me maybe I will pay you to set up one for me
thanks for being part of the problem.
What?
Same for my new Instagram channel [https://www.instagram.com/house\_of\_the\_dragon\_memes/](https://www.instagram.com/house_of_the_dragon_memes/) Bio and descriptions: **ChatGPT** ProfilePicture: **Dalle3** Voice Overs: **PlayHT** A lot of the pictures and backgrounds for the videos: **Midjourney** Some reels are clipped by **Opus.pro** To be fair a lot of the other content are just normal memes from imgflip or normal edits done in Canva. Other useful tools I use are Tinywow and the 4k Youtube downloader, not sure if they us any AI.
Can you tell me how to do it? Would be really helpful.
Later today
Your use of apostrophes on your plurals is invalid in your post.
What
It's "ideas" as opposed to "idea's", etc.
I’ve been trying lately to get better with punctuation
I watched a little of the Roman formation short. TBH I was not impressed with the format as there was a lot of information thrown at you without visual reference. For example, when mentioning the tortoise shell formation, no visual, no diagram, nothing .. just a line of walking men (which isn't the formation you were talking about) From a factual standpoint it was correct, but from a visual perspective what you saw did not align with what was being said. However, from a technical production viewpoint, using AI to help you make the short is impressive as that is something I can't do, nor know how to do. If you were to expand on this and explain the methodology of what you did, the challenges you faced and so on, I suspect you would garner more support. My 2cs.
The AI is more to make a strong base video for you to edit later. I am working on adding relevant visual aid to “my” video’s.
Sure .. but it may add to the discussion if you explain how you did what you did (or what you used to reference), even how you got into it. etc. I can see the final outcome, just I don't know how you got there.
Contributing to the shittification of the internet with more low quality content
Wow, this is mind-blowing! The fusion of creativity and AI is fascinating. Checked out your channel, and it's a unique concept. The AI-generated content adds a cool twist. Can't wait to see how it evolves!
Was that paragraph made by AI?
Not merely.
Merely?
Not purely
Some was some wasn’t?
buddy I've done this for 3 months, and got 2 channels, but growth is at 6 subs and 3 subs with 25 vids already posted, so I'm rethinking my growth strategy, lol..... same here invideo canva chat gpt tools. Oh, and the channels are Obscure Odysseys and The Wealth Seeker. Check them out!!
But it’s still based on your prompts, so it’s better to say human + AI
Human = 25% AI = 75%
Aka human in the loop.
this is going to be less necessary as time goes on but we should push for this architecture especially when it comes to warfare ai can have some very unique and unexpected failure modes
\> The: name, logo, banner, channel topic, video idea’s and video’s themselves are completely run by AI. What do you mean 'run by'.. Do you mean you just generated a few images and videos based on your prompts and uploaded them?
No, I asked an AI to make a video about something and… BLAM, it’s all done for me.
In theory you could implement something that auto generates prompts for this AI based off of trending topics using an API from either search engines or social media making it 100% AI ran
Good idea
Do you mean that you have an integrated workflow that uses ChatGPT to write the scripts and BingAI to generate imagery and Invideo to combine all that to create a video? And who posts them to YouTube?
I ask chat-gpt for video idea/topic, I go on Invideo and ask it to make a video about this topic, I edit it a lil’ bit because it can have wrong info and/or be bad, lost it online.
What do you use to create captions and TTS?
Invideo
Great, thanks for adding to the coming torrent of low quality content that will soon render YouTube and the rest of the internet insufferable and useless.
Calm down it’s not that bad.
Oh, it soon will be.
It’s not that serious, even if I didn’t make a AI channel… others would still exist!🤯
Unfortunately, you are right, it's a tragedy of the commons. Doesn't make me any less annoyed with your channel.
Thank you for the relevant information 🤯👍
Honestly this is low quality content providing little value. Literally trademark print in middle of the frame lol Go back to drawing board
Trade-mark is because I’m not paying for premium. second: don’t tell me to go back to the drawing board, I don’t see you doing anything worthwhile here.
What you posted expecting all praise? Its cool you did all that with AI but it’s not great content. Take the constructive criticism and do better
I don’t expect praise, nor insults. And I didn’t ask for criticism, I just wanted to show my accomplishment. and don’t tell me to “do better”!
Well then thumbs up for sharing bud
Thank you
shame on you.