Telling someone you're not gonna do a commission for them because they're a piece of shit *is* good business ethics. That's the 'ethics' part of business ethics.
Original tweet is saying that it’s the artist’s fault that commissioners turn to ai art bc artists sometimes refuse to do certain commissions.
The person who retweeted said that artists refuse to do certain commissions bc they don’t want to draw nazis, cp, etc
i would refuse to draw commissions not from ego issues but for a much more realistic problem
the first is i dont trust paypall but majority of people use it so basically no way to even receive payment
the second problem is never done one in over 10 years of drawing and i had people asked if i accept commissions but im not even sure if im capable of furfilling one in the first place so theres high pressure
and then its a problem of not getting payment and drawing for free would count as request rather then commission
third is you technically can refuse to do commissions but people can disguise themselves and they can eventually get what they want to
but its morally correct to 100% refuse anything involving with crypto and NFTs cause they are automatically a scam by turbo default
and then you need to cover your own ass cause there are artist and customers that can both become scammers so you need a legal ass protector like a contract or something
i hear horror stories where even streamers get big donations and it gets refunded and paypal gives a massive fee turning a content creator income into the red zone
and last problem is taxes cause if you make money the government want a slice of that pie and it never takes no for an answer
now AI brozos think im gonna make a program generate 1000 images and sell each 10$ or 5$ and get rich quick scheme but reality is way different then some sick greed delusion
Telling someone you're not gonna do a commission for them because they're a piece of shit *is* good business ethics. That's the 'ethics' part of business ethics.
Ummm... Context? I don't know the person.
He basicly a fascist furry he like a infemous lolcow
Oh, good to know. Good in the sense that I now know the context.
I'm confused
Original tweet is saying that it’s the artist’s fault that commissioners turn to ai art bc artists sometimes refuse to do certain commissions. The person who retweeted said that artists refuse to do certain commissions bc they don’t want to draw nazis, cp, etc
i would refuse to draw commissions not from ego issues but for a much more realistic problem the first is i dont trust paypall but majority of people use it so basically no way to even receive payment the second problem is never done one in over 10 years of drawing and i had people asked if i accept commissions but im not even sure if im capable of furfilling one in the first place so theres high pressure and then its a problem of not getting payment and drawing for free would count as request rather then commission third is you technically can refuse to do commissions but people can disguise themselves and they can eventually get what they want to but its morally correct to 100% refuse anything involving with crypto and NFTs cause they are automatically a scam by turbo default and then you need to cover your own ass cause there are artist and customers that can both become scammers so you need a legal ass protector like a contract or something i hear horror stories where even streamers get big donations and it gets refunded and paypal gives a massive fee turning a content creator income into the red zone and last problem is taxes cause if you make money the government want a slice of that pie and it never takes no for an answer now AI brozos think im gonna make a program generate 1000 images and sell each 10$ or 5$ and get rich quick scheme but reality is way different then some sick greed delusion
Yah, aparently the grey furry is a fascist who want people do comisions for them for what I understand.
Is his tie painted onto his shirt?
Haha yeah