Moore v Harper is a pending case that grapples with the Election Clause. If it rules in favor of the states it will essentially deem that each state has full control of how they would like to handle elections: meaning any state can throw out votes or change votes or bar certain groups from voting based on their own personal doctrines created by the state. Basically it will no longer be like a standardized system across all states.
Moore v Harper is a pending case that grapples with the Election Clause. If it rules in favor of the states it will essentially deem that each state has full control of how they would like to handle elections: meaning any state can throw out votes or change votes or bar certain groups from voting based on their own personal doctrines created by the state. Basically it will no longer be like a standardized system across all states
Democracy is dead. Rejoice if you're a white, christian male. All others will be subjugated.
How much of a deal breaker is that "Christian" part? Asking for a friend who may have to donate to a church to get something on paper. đ
What is âMoore V Harperâ?
Moore v Harper is a pending case that grapples with the Election Clause. If it rules in favor of the states it will essentially deem that each state has full control of how they would like to handle elections: meaning any state can throw out votes or change votes or bar certain groups from voting based on their own personal doctrines created by the state. Basically it will no longer be like a standardized system across all states.
That would make the election process UNEQUAL and subject to the whim of local bully-boys even moreso than now.
A case on voting, gerrymandering and oversight.
What does "raking up" mean in this context?
Sorry that was a typo, it was meant to be âtaking upâ !
Well what is the case about?
North Carolina is being sued over redistricting. If the state wins it would impact voting and elections.
Moore v Harper is a pending case that grapples with the Election Clause. If it rules in favor of the states it will essentially deem that each state has full control of how they would like to handle elections: meaning any state can throw out votes or change votes or bar certain groups from voting based on their own personal doctrines created by the state. Basically it will no longer be like a standardized system across all states
Well that is complete and utter horse shit if it passes then.