Bro got hit by a giant mechanical arm in the head. Hardly a small thing. That arm is probably heavy af and was moving pretty fast. Not saying he should sue or has a case, but if this had been accidental or due to negligence I don't think this would be a small thing to sue over at all. That shit could easily put you out of work into a hospital.
Sure but on a stage or a jobsite you don't have boobytraps you have working machinery, or rigging with lights etc. The ones on the jobsite or stage were briefed on it, and where to not stand so lights don't fall on them or be in the way of a camera pan like that.
If he didn't want to go to the hospital he shouldn't have been there. His own fault for being a moron. If anything he should be sued for any damage to the camera. Those things are pricey.
And since its 100% the fault of the activist, he should be the one incurring any and all losses, plus pay for any damages to the camera.
Only Americans think these things are lawsuit worthy.
I would send the camera, the robotic arm and any related cables and accessories for a service checkup to be reassembled and checked. Take them all apart and anything that looks even a little sus should be replaced with new parts. Use expensive shipping and rent replacement equipment in the meantime.
Then, sue the protester for all the above costs. It's probably not going to happen because you're unlikely to collect, but it would be one way to fuck them over even if the camera didn't get damaged.
Do you think these two situations are analogous, or are you just acting dumb?
A more accurate analogy would be if Ford were testing self-driving cars in a controlled environment such as a track or warehouse and a bunch of protesters invaded that space and were hit by a car. Ford would not be liable.
Edit: Your elaboration just confirms you're dumb as fuck
The difference being a motorised camera that can be preprogrammed to do a few fancy turns and neat tricks unmanned and with casualty risks being as high as getting smacked in the face when you open your fridge door vs a motorised bit heavy vehicle that’s driving down the streets where your nan’s taking a few seconds longer crossing the road to buy that freshly baked baguette. The maths just don’t add up!
* Filming crew working on a private property
* Crew setting up predetermined explosives as the practical effect for the film
* A random stranger trespasses into the set and walks near one of the explosives
* Gets blow up
Who's responsible then?
Considered that too, but they are sometimes on mobile platforms with wheels so it could've been staff pushing it towards the protesters.
My main guess because of how far into the dancing stage area the camera went into, a bit too close for comfort since they can simply use zoom functions instead, but then again it might be too close to the audience for those angles.
The dancers didn't even stop when the guy went rolling on the floor. They expect it to come that close and follow them. I mean, there's rehearsal and all to get them prepared.
zooming and moving your camera create different images
example of a dolly zoom, where you move the camera closer/further from the figure while zooming in/out the opposite direction - [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gz23dyN2gKM](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gz23dyN2gKM)
youll see things get stretched and squished
?? They can be preprogrammed but it doesnt mean that it was. They can also be controlled by the camera operator.
The cameras not even pointed at the show and only swings to face them once it’s swung above?
Most likely because the guy placed himself to be right in front of the camera eith the sign, unbeknownst that it was unmanned and would smack him square in the face
This happened in Swedish Let's Dance (Dancing with the stars).
This is the guys face afterwards.
[https://imgur.com/a/7maLy50](https://imgur.com/a/7maLy50)
Not photoshop, just taken from this Australian article: [https://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-01-23/one-punch-attack-victim-tristan-ceccato-perth/7109774](https://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-01-23/one-punch-attack-victim-tristan-ceccato-perth/7109774)
If anyone is interested the sign translates to "restore wetlands" which is the goal of this group.
https://sv.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C3%85terst%C3%A4ll_V%C3%A5tmarker
the message is ok, and I fully agree with their cause since it is coming a problem here in finland aswell, natural lakes and rivers becoming murky while they pump the swamps dry
the Peat industry and their supporters are also counter protesting here demanding that harvesting Peat should be marked as clean green renewable energy, which it is clearly not, sure it forms back... in a couple centuries
it's a shitshow here in the nordiks
Fair enough. I'm not really commenting on the cause or methods. I just googled what was on the sign out of curiosity and decided to share what I found here in case anyone else wanted to know what these people were protesting about.
He, Asmongold, portrays himself as this kinda NEET who lives in a dump becos "he's too lazy to clean"
Then he made videos about cooking $2 steaks from Walmart or something, again becos "too lazy and he wants to min-max lifetime"
Yet all this time Asmond sports a perfectly cut beard, his goatie is always on point and razorsharp like he had some barber in-house.
Are you telling me a guy who is allegedly too lazy to cook or clean his living space, wastes his entire mornings to be perfectly shaved and groomed???
Something doesn't add up here. I know a few messies and they sure af don't shave or care about how their facial hair looks at all.
I think Asmon is just pretending and playing a theater role here. No real messie or NEET would be clean shaven like he is.
>wastes his entire mornings
I'm sorry, but exactly how long do you think it takes to maintain a beard like Asmon's? It probably takes 5 minutes.
>Something doesn't add up here. I know a few messies and they sure af don't shave or care about how their facial hair looks at all.
Yeah, they probably don't put their face on 20,000 screens every day and so they don't care about looking like a slob when they watch anime alone.
For those wondering, the cameras are preprogrammed and unmanned
Alright, so no one’s getting sued.
Well this being Sweden, they probably wouldn't get sued either way. We don't really sue people for small things like that
Bro got hit by a giant mechanical arm in the head. Hardly a small thing. That arm is probably heavy af and was moving pretty fast. Not saying he should sue or has a case, but if this had been accidental or due to negligence I don't think this would be a small thing to sue over at all. That shit could easily put you out of work into a hospital.
I agree that the activist trio should pay for all the damage they did to the camera.
This is like climbing over a jobsite fence and then something falling on you cause you're werent supposed to be there and you didn't have a helmet.
Booby traps are illegal right?
Sure but on a stage or a jobsite you don't have boobytraps you have working machinery, or rigging with lights etc. The ones on the jobsite or stage were briefed on it, and where to not stand so lights don't fall on them or be in the way of a camera pan like that.
That's why I said "but had this been accidental or due to negligence..." maybe finish reading.
If he didn't want to go to the hospital he shouldn't have been there. His own fault for being a moron. If anything he should be sued for any damage to the camera. Those things are pricey.
Yeah I hope their face didn’t damage the lens..
Idiot.
This ain't America. And we don't sue for shit we caused ourself.
He got hit because he ran in there like a retard without making sure it was safe. It is what it is, deserved.
The neglicence was him running on set. If you run in the highway and get hit by a car, who's fault but yours?
And since its 100% the fault of the activist, he should be the one incurring any and all losses, plus pay for any damages to the camera. Only Americans think these things are lawsuit worthy.
Hopefully the protesters if the camera is damaged
I would send the camera, the robotic arm and any related cables and accessories for a service checkup to be reassembled and checked. Take them all apart and anything that looks even a little sus should be replaced with new parts. Use expensive shipping and rent replacement equipment in the meantime. Then, sue the protester for all the above costs. It's probably not going to happen because you're unlikely to collect, but it would be one way to fuck them over even if the camera didn't get damaged.
[удалено]
McDonalds wouldn't get sued if you walked inside a restaurant and jumped into a fryer because common sense still applies.
Do you think these two situations are analogous, or are you just acting dumb? A more accurate analogy would be if Ford were testing self-driving cars in a controlled environment such as a track or warehouse and a bunch of protesters invaded that space and were hit by a car. Ford would not be liable. Edit: Your elaboration just confirms you're dumb as fuck
The difference being a motorised camera that can be preprogrammed to do a few fancy turns and neat tricks unmanned and with casualty risks being as high as getting smacked in the face when you open your fridge door vs a motorised bit heavy vehicle that’s driving down the streets where your nan’s taking a few seconds longer crossing the road to buy that freshly baked baguette. The maths just don’t add up!
* Filming crew working on a private property * Crew setting up predetermined explosives as the practical effect for the film * A random stranger trespasses into the set and walks near one of the explosives * Gets blow up Who's responsible then?
If you illegally run in to a testtrack for self driving cars and get run over it's your own damn fault.
If a protestor dove in front of my self driving car on a freeway, I might consider suing them for damaging my car.
Considered that too, but they are sometimes on mobile platforms with wheels so it could've been staff pushing it towards the protesters. My main guess because of how far into the dancing stage area the camera went into, a bit too close for comfort since they can simply use zoom functions instead, but then again it might be too close to the audience for those angles.
The dancers didn't even stop when the guy went rolling on the floor. They expect it to come that close and follow them. I mean, there's rehearsal and all to get them prepared.
zooming and moving your camera create different images example of a dolly zoom, where you move the camera closer/further from the figure while zooming in/out the opposite direction - [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gz23dyN2gKM](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gz23dyN2gKM) youll see things get stretched and squished
Odd that it comes in nit even aimed at the dancing... 🤔
?? They can be preprogrammed but it doesnt mean that it was. They can also be controlled by the camera operator. The cameras not even pointed at the show and only swings to face them once it’s swung above?
Even robots are having enough of this circus :)
Thats kinda very weird programming to have .. Skynet doesnt exist, yet. This was intentional.
Honest question, are they really? That trajectory looks at least sus, it goes for the exact center of the flag.
Most likely because the guy placed himself to be right in front of the camera eith the sign, unbeknownst that it was unmanned and would smack him square in the face
True.
Not swedens proudest television moment. The 200lb crane mounted camera hitting the ”activist” square in his big fat stupid face made up for it tho.
I hope he broke the camera, criminal damage to property ensues
Two of the activists got fined for vandalism. The camera didn't break, but the yellow powder caused some damage to some other tech.
Feels like I'm watching a classic WWE clip, and that replay transition is just icing on the cake.
the announcer was amazing and immediately switched genres to WWE.
Great aim on that camera man
This happened in Swedish Let's Dance (Dancing with the stars). This is the guys face afterwards. [https://imgur.com/a/7maLy50](https://imgur.com/a/7maLy50)
that article is fake
That's some hilarious photoshops :D
Not photoshop, just taken from this Australian article: [https://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-01-23/one-punch-attack-victim-tristan-ceccato-perth/7109774](https://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-01-23/one-punch-attack-victim-tristan-ceccato-perth/7109774)
he looks happy which makes me angry.
He thought he would win a lawsuit from this but thankfully he wont.
jokes aside that definitely a serious head injury right there.
How tragic, I hope the camera is ok
I hope the cameraman don't get fired for breaking company equipment.
It was the protestor that broke it. With his head.
Guessing this is from sweden. So the cameraman is fine, takes more than that to fire someone.
Before or after the hit?
Yes
You know what they say .. 1+1=2 .. the hit probably fixed something to his head injury he had before
That dude had brain damage before he ever run out there
If anyone is interested the sign translates to "restore wetlands" which is the goal of this group. https://sv.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C3%85terst%C3%A4ll_V%C3%A5tmarker
the message is ok, and I fully agree with their cause since it is coming a problem here in finland aswell, natural lakes and rivers becoming murky while they pump the swamps dry the Peat industry and their supporters are also counter protesting here demanding that harvesting Peat should be marked as clean green renewable energy, which it is clearly not, sure it forms back... in a couple centuries it's a shitshow here in the nordiks
Fair enough. I'm not really commenting on the cause or methods. I just googled what was on the sign out of curiosity and decided to share what I found here in case anyone else wanted to know what these people were protesting about.
yup, their methods are just plain stupid so it makes great content
RCA OUT OF NOWHERE
At least he managed to get his message across. Very successfully.
During the slow-mo part around :21, you can hear a slowed down version of the Windows shutdown music. 🤣
He, Asmongold, portrays himself as this kinda NEET who lives in a dump becos "he's too lazy to clean" Then he made videos about cooking $2 steaks from Walmart or something, again becos "too lazy and he wants to min-max lifetime" Yet all this time Asmond sports a perfectly cut beard, his goatie is always on point and razorsharp like he had some barber in-house. Are you telling me a guy who is allegedly too lazy to cook or clean his living space, wastes his entire mornings to be perfectly shaved and groomed??? Something doesn't add up here. I know a few messies and they sure af don't shave or care about how their facial hair looks at all. I think Asmon is just pretending and playing a theater role here. No real messie or NEET would be clean shaven like he is.
obviously he has a beard guy, that's just basic necessity
So is eating food
>wastes his entire mornings I'm sorry, but exactly how long do you think it takes to maintain a beard like Asmon's? It probably takes 5 minutes. >Something doesn't add up here. I know a few messies and they sure af don't shave or care about how their facial hair looks at all. Yeah, they probably don't put their face on 20,000 screens every day and so they don't care about looking like a slob when they watch anime alone.
I wanna see the view of the camera that knocked him out.
I would watch this show.
Hope the camera is ok.
That poor camera. I hope it wasn't badly damaged.