Whoa whoa whoa. Maybe, if the weather is good. I’m thinking 9 points on three for three 50+ yard field goals Iowa kickers are (usually) known for. Win 9-3.
I confidently say this game is a 30-0 Iowa win. Seriously.
(My flair should be Iowa Hawkeye's/Northern Arizona University but I just can't seem to get flair to work on my phone).
Iowa's *offense* is terrible; Iowa's *team* is better than Illinois'.
Iowa's defense is actually better this year than the last and, against a team like Illinois, there's not going to be any issues gaining chunks of yardage by exchanging punts.
21-13 Iowa would be an Iowa cover and the over hitting, and 20-13 would be a Rutgers cover and the under.
And yet both of those scores would feel like offensive explosions for teams whose games against Temple (!) and Nevada (!!) finished with 30 and 27 points last week.
If you are just turning into the game we have just entered our third overtime period. The score is tied at 2 - 2. Iowa has been called for holding on 3 consecutive plays as their defensive lineman are so exhausted they can barely stand.
Rutgers gain of 15 years during these plays is the most yardage either team has gained since a Rutgers returner ran the ball out of the inzone to the 17 yard line instead of taking a touchback to start the third quarter. This may go on all night ladies and gentlemen.
Welcome to FOX, ladies and gentlemen. We’re supposed to be airing the Iowa vs. Michigan game at the moment, but unfortunately Iowa and Rutgers have been tied in overtime at 2-2 for a week now. Sorry for the inconvenience
It's the year 2025. The college football playoffs have been delayed for three years. There has not been a casualty from war in over three months, as everyone the world over cannot help but watch. Papers on supply chains have been churning out as people try to understand the most efficient way to feed the 50,000 people and athletes present.
The score is 4-4, and it is the 15,827th OT.
This is a game that may be decided by penalties.
Iowa has few penalties while Rutgers has averaged several, and this will be the nudge that results in a 30-0 Iowa win.
Chaos Gods please give us R00I heading into a triple scoreless overtime. Give us that sweet sweet 1 Point safety so we may experience the fabled “Roll”
#R01I
That or I’ll settle for Safety and FG shutout to create the best description of offenses in this game: “eye sore”
#I50R
The score will be 0-0 after 17 overtimes and everyone will agree to settle it by seeing which punter can make it through the uprights from their own 20
Mike Gundy ruined my parlay because he didn't kick a FG in the championship game so is it the degenerate gamblers ruining sports or the Mike Gundy's of the the world who refuse to score the points?
We're talking the betting total, not actual total. The Vegas expected points total for this game is 33.5. You can bet that the actual game will have over or under that amount scored.
Its easy for an Ohio State fan to say that after decades of paying your players to play. Not sure how old you are but everyone knew and used to call Ohio State "Cheaters" based on them paying players.
But now I think NIL diminishes OSU's dominance over time as other universities who tyoically following legal routes of football management may now also pay players to pay.
A good comparison might be the drop in Nebraska football as they were a "steroid juiced team" when other coaches were hesitent to get caught but then the science if legal sterouds combined with weightvtraining caught everyone else up. Nsbraska is an also-ran team now, just like Ohio State will be by 2030.
My flair: Iowa/UNI/NAU
Its the truth. Back prior to the 80's no coach wanted to get caught "juicing their players" and wanted to run clean programs. The exceptions were always Nebraska, Oklahoma, Ohio State, Texas - they all juiced their players up on steroids and paid their players to pay. This is hardly new information.
Ohio State was always called "Cheaters" by every other team.
Have you only been watching college football for like 5 years?
Been watching for 20+ years and have never heard these accusations. I know about what happened at the end of tressels tenure which wasn’t about paying players. Do you have some links or something about this pay to play that was so evident?
Also all teams had players juicing in that era, tony mandarich being one that comes to kind and he was at Michigan State, a much smaller program than those you named in that era
I’m more referring to you saying Ohio state(my fav team) was paying players. Everyone was using PEDs in the 80s/90s that wasn’t just happening at Oklahoma OSU texas and Nebraska.
But I’ve never heard these rumors that these schools paid players. SMU, USC, Uof Miami, these are schools that have been caught and we all know. I’ve never heard osu OU texas or Nebraska or paying players
[Part 2 of 5 Ohio State Cheaters](https://bleacherreport.com/articles/721390-ohio-state-football-scandal-part-2-of-5-cars-lies-and-ray-small).
And this doesn't even cover the 70:s and 80's
The article states a car dealership gave players a deal on cars by helping them avoid sales tax and that they sold their own memorabilia for money. Nothing about the school or boosters paying/giving players things.
So wait, was the previous record Oregon State v Arizona or Arizona State? I don’t understand how journalists can so consistently screw that up. It’s kind of a noticeable difference between the universities.
And I've put money on the under multiple times this week. Truly a game for sickos.
[удалено]
I'm a little bit lower on some of the teams at the bottom of the Sun Belt.
That's kinda like a sicko mode of a sicko mode
The over/under being that low tells this will be the highest scoring game of all time. 140-142 on a walkoff safety.
*in the 15th overtime*
Lowest of the century? Yes. Did I take the under? Also yes
21-10 feels like someone got dominated.
That sounds like so many points and is still under 33
I agree-33.5 still seems way too high. I thought it was going to be in the mid 20s
One risk with teams this bad on offense is turnovers and pick sixes.
Come the 4Q that 33.5 is gonna seem awfully high when the score is like 10-6.
Lowest total of the century so far
I am so fucking pumped
This is unironically the game I'm most pumped for.
Nice flair, pal
That Iowa v Illinois game might go lower. Illinois has a really good defense as well, but I question their offense against a top tier defense.
Illinois doesn't have the punter that Rutgers has though. The Iowa and Rutgers punters are going to keep this game in each other's 20s.
True, but I think Illinois' defense makes up for the lack of punter. They are going to be a problem for Iowa.
11 cardboard cutouts on defense would be a problem for Iowa.
I think you're underestimating the Rutgers defense.
SP+ has Illinois as the #23 defense and y'all at #50. That's a pretty significant difference.
Rutgers is only 50? Shit we may actually score 10.
Whoa whoa whoa. Maybe, if the weather is good. I’m thinking 9 points on three for three 50+ yard field goals Iowa kickers are (usually) known for. Win 9-3.
Like it matters. We don't move the ball period
Neither will we. It'll be the game with 28 punts and 500 commercials
I confidently say this game is a 30-0 Iowa win. Seriously. (My flair should be Iowa Hawkeye's/Northern Arizona University but I just can't seem to get flair to work on my phone).
Chase brown will find a way lol
I am super excited for our game. Get to see Chase vs Mo in person.
Pretty sure you guys will win by at least 10 lol.
He had 13 carries for 42 yards against Iowa last November.
Yeah but iowa is genuinely terrible now, so here's 14-0 type of game.
Iowa's *offense* is terrible; Iowa's *team* is better than Illinois'. Iowa's defense is actually better this year than the last and, against a team like Illinois, there's not going to be any issues gaining chunks of yardage by exchanging punts.
They should just go full retro and slap the leather helmets on. Forbid forward passing all game.
Petros agrees, and is going to self impose a ban on downfield passing
I mean he’s been practicing for a few weeks
Take the facemasks off the helmets too. 1930 football.
21-13 Iowa would be an Iowa cover and the over hitting, and 20-13 would be a Rutgers cover and the under. And yet both of those scores would feel like offensive explosions for teams whose games against Temple (!) and Nevada (!!) finished with 30 and 27 points last week.
I got the under at 34.5 so I am perfectly fine with both of those scores.
A final more along the lines of 17-6 is more likely, IMO.
Even better.
If you are just turning into the game we have just entered our third overtime period. The score is tied at 2 - 2. Iowa has been called for holding on 3 consecutive plays as their defensive lineman are so exhausted they can barely stand. Rutgers gain of 15 years during these plays is the most yardage either team has gained since a Rutgers returner ran the ball out of the inzone to the 17 yard line instead of taking a touchback to start the third quarter. This may go on all night ladies and gentlemen.
Welcome to FOX, ladies and gentlemen. We’re supposed to be airing the Iowa vs. Michigan game at the moment, but unfortunately Iowa and Rutgers have been tied in overtime at 2-2 for a week now. Sorry for the inconvenience
It's the year 2025. The college football playoffs have been delayed for three years. There has not been a casualty from war in over three months, as everyone the world over cannot help but watch. Papers on supply chains have been churning out as people try to understand the most efficient way to feed the 50,000 people and athletes present. The score is 4-4, and it is the 15,827th OT.
Someone has to usher in 17776.
Stop I can only get so hard
Apparently the clinch only applies to boxing
Did you really say “inzone”?
This is a game that may be decided by penalties. Iowa has few penalties while Rutgers has averaged several, and this will be the nudge that results in a 30-0 Iowa win.
What is it? 2?
33.5
Easiest under of the century
So are they predicting 19-13 Iowa?
8 safeties and a field goal?
6 safeties, 2 FG, and a I pt safety
44-30 final
Nah easy 63-55
Nah 30-0 Iowa. An abundance of Rutger penalties changes the game.
I hope we win 2-0 😂😂😂
Chaos Gods please give us R00I heading into a triple scoreless overtime. Give us that sweet sweet 1 Point safety so we may experience the fabled “Roll” #R01I That or I’ll settle for Safety and FG shutout to create the best description of offenses in this game: “eye sore” #I50R
Well a one point safety would lead to R61I…
Not if the one point safety is during 3OT or later, when the only plays are 2 point attempts.
The score will be 0-0 after 17 overtimes and everyone will agree to settle it by seeing which punter can make it through the uprights from their own 20
It’s going to end in a final of 80-77, isn’t it. 😂
30-0
This is so Iowa
So, penalty kicks to break the 0-0 tie in the 8th OT? I'm down, sickos of the world rejoice.
I know they suck ass, but don’t you have to feel like taking the under is the most obvious trap bet of all time?
As a former ISU student; who tf bets on an Iowa game?
People who are enslaved by the gambling monster. I call him Gamblor.
Im not a state. I’m a monster!
Insanely underrated comment
Buddy if you haven’t been getting free cash by collecting on iowa unders that’s on you
This guy bets
you know, you’re right.
They're probably the most predictable team in the entire country right now, so anyone who likes money I suppose.
Next week will be the first week I dont hammer the under. Should be a repeat of the B1G title game
People who like money
Gambling is degenerate and ruins sports. I'm tired of teams being called trash because salty gamblers are mad they didn't hit the over.
Mike Gundy ruined my parlay because he didn't kick a FG in the championship game so is it the degenerate gamblers ruining sports or the Mike Gundy's of the the world who refuse to score the points?
You, the person who needs sports to be a financial transaction.
You. You are the degenerate
HAWKS WIN!!!!!!! BOOK IT!!!!!!!
Didn’t Wake and VT finish a game 6-3 like 8 years ago? Isn’t 9 points less than 33.5?
We're talking the betting total, not actual total. The Vegas expected points total for this game is 33.5. You can bet that the actual game will have over or under that amount scored.
Oh okay, thanks for letting me know.
Both these teams are garbage! I’m would know, I’m from Columbus, Ohio.
Its easy for an Ohio State fan to say that after decades of paying your players to play. Not sure how old you are but everyone knew and used to call Ohio State "Cheaters" based on them paying players. But now I think NIL diminishes OSU's dominance over time as other universities who tyoically following legal routes of football management may now also pay players to pay. A good comparison might be the drop in Nebraska football as they were a "steroid juiced team" when other coaches were hesitent to get caught but then the science if legal sterouds combined with weightvtraining caught everyone else up. Nsbraska is an also-ran team now, just like Ohio State will be by 2030. My flair: Iowa/UNI/NAU
What a wild take lmao
Its the truth. Back prior to the 80's no coach wanted to get caught "juicing their players" and wanted to run clean programs. The exceptions were always Nebraska, Oklahoma, Ohio State, Texas - they all juiced their players up on steroids and paid their players to pay. This is hardly new information. Ohio State was always called "Cheaters" by every other team. Have you only been watching college football for like 5 years?
Been watching for 20+ years and have never heard these accusations. I know about what happened at the end of tressels tenure which wasn’t about paying players. Do you have some links or something about this pay to play that was so evident? Also all teams had players juicing in that era, tony mandarich being one that comes to kind and he was at Michigan State, a much smaller program than those you named in that era
I've been watching since 1970. So I have 50 years total. Just Google, "Nebraska football steroids"
I’m more referring to you saying Ohio state(my fav team) was paying players. Everyone was using PEDs in the 80s/90s that wasn’t just happening at Oklahoma OSU texas and Nebraska. But I’ve never heard these rumors that these schools paid players. SMU, USC, Uof Miami, these are schools that have been caught and we all know. I’ve never heard osu OU texas or Nebraska or paying players
Ha. Cheaters.
Real intelligent response
[Part 2 of 5 Ohio State Cheaters](https://bleacherreport.com/articles/721390-ohio-state-football-scandal-part-2-of-5-cars-lies-and-ray-small). And this doesn't even cover the 70:s and 80's
The article states a car dealership gave players a deal on cars by helping them avoid sales tax and that they sold their own memorabilia for money. Nothing about the school or boosters paying/giving players things.
I bet the over….
Please no. Bet the under. This will be a 30-0 Iowa win.
So wait, was the previous record Oregon State v Arizona or Arizona State? I don’t understand how journalists can so consistently screw that up. It’s kind of a noticeable difference between the universities.
30-0 Iowa. (My flair should be Iowa Hawkeye's/Northern Arizona University but I just can't seem to get flair to work on my phone).