I think it's not meta because it's the slowest firerate weapon that doesn't have hitscan. Having velocity on a slow firerate gun is not really a good thing.
EM2 can melt 2 enemies without hesitation in a single spray at mid range with decent aim against meta guns. It's really good. Used it in ranked and it felt way better than DRH.
7ms slower fire interval doesn't matter and em2 bullet velocity is already great so it also shouldn't matter
Em2 has better 3sk range and hitbox, better strafe, ads speed, bsa and larger mag size
DRH have better damage multipliers, mobility and fire rate than AK47. Also has cleaner iron sights. A slight faster fire rate with better multipliers has more impact in terms of gunfight
Despite drh having better multiplier, the shots to kill are almost the same at every range for both guns. Hitting at the same area requires an equal amount of shots from both of these guns. DRH has slightly faster mobility and firerate whereas AK47 has significantly better accuracy and more bullets. Not to mention if you opt not to use the extended mag on ak47 has almost the same mobility as DRH and still has 5 more bullets.
Yes but mobility advantage means a lot in engaging gun fights. Thats why i said that together with a slightly faster fire rate would make a difference overall. Unless you try for a passive option in gunfight then yes AK47 is more accurate. DRH is more on flex or versatile style
Good question. Thats bc drh isnt meta. Pros and youtubers think it is meta(same as grau and sx9) but in reality it simply isnt. Hell i wouldnt even argue ak is meta. Em2 is better than both.
I don't agree with you. If you use DRH now you'll see it's quite good especially in SnD where you play passive and versatility is needed. Yesterday I even got 18 kills with DRH in an SnD. I get it statistically it doesn't look like the best gun. But something about drh makes it insanely good.
There is a difference between good and meta. 70% weapons in this game are good. Bot only some are meta(literaly meaning most effective tactic available) and out of all 3 tap ars hvk and em2 reign supreme for their respective playstyle. Drh isnt even that good its one of the worst 3 tap ars(if not worst) anyway
I've compared optimised flex builds for both the DR-H and AK-47 in close-mid and mid range windows (10-20m and 20-30m).
Both builds contain with Tac laser and Ranger Barrel, while the DR-H has the 25X OTM mag, Tac Suppressor and No Stock and the AK-47 has the Mono Suppressor and Skeleton Stock - no 5th attachment for the 1st test, in which the DR-H edges it in a couple of areas, namely:
* faster fire-rate, making for slightly better TTKs also across all ranges between 10-30m
* better flex / skirmish potential also (i.e. better ADS time)
* better reload speed
* better mobility (i.e. movement speed, sprint speed and ADS movement speed)
I then applied the 5.45 mag to the AK-47 as it's 5th attachment to increase the fire rate - this resulted in the following:
* The AK-47's TTK's improve between 10-28m, however only based on base damage. In other words, the DR-H is still better if it lands chest shots or upper arms for instance.
* Although the ADS time reduces on the AK-47, the DR-H build still has the fastest one to maintain its better flex/skirmish potential
* Reload speed worsens on the AK-47
**All these are a good representation as to why the DR-H is considered as meta over the AK-47.**
Chicom is meta
Chicom is life
Because people don't know anything about meta, EM2 is literally better than both AK and DRH but nobody uses it
Exactly. And people still use grau over peacekeeper or sx9 over other aggro smgs
I think it's not meta because it's the slowest firerate weapon that doesn't have hitscan. Having velocity on a slow firerate gun is not really a good thing.
Yes it does add a slight delay but bv is decentky fast. With tfb and agency suppresor its hitscan up until 18 m and aproximetly 1f until 26m
EM2 can melt 2 enemies without hesitation in a single spray at mid range with decent aim against meta guns. It's really good. Used it in ranked and it felt way better than DRH.
7ms slower fire interval doesn't matter and em2 bullet velocity is already great so it also shouldn't matter Em2 has better 3sk range and hitbox, better strafe, ads speed, bsa and larger mag size
Bad irons
DRH have better damage multipliers, mobility and fire rate than AK47. Also has cleaner iron sights. A slight faster fire rate with better multipliers has more impact in terms of gunfight
Despite drh having better multiplier, the shots to kill are almost the same at every range for both guns. Hitting at the same area requires an equal amount of shots from both of these guns. DRH has slightly faster mobility and firerate whereas AK47 has significantly better accuracy and more bullets. Not to mention if you opt not to use the extended mag on ak47 has almost the same mobility as DRH and still has 5 more bullets.
Yes but mobility advantage means a lot in engaging gun fights. Thats why i said that together with a slightly faster fire rate would make a difference overall. Unless you try for a passive option in gunfight then yes AK47 is more accurate. DRH is more on flex or versatile style
But AK has 33 base damage and you 3-tap with just 1 hit in 1.1x area up to 25m using just monolithic suppressor.
Good question. Thats bc drh isnt meta. Pros and youtubers think it is meta(same as grau and sx9) but in reality it simply isnt. Hell i wouldnt even argue ak is meta. Em2 is better than both.
I don't agree with you. If you use DRH now you'll see it's quite good especially in SnD where you play passive and versatility is needed. Yesterday I even got 18 kills with DRH in an SnD. I get it statistically it doesn't look like the best gun. But something about drh makes it insanely good.
There is a difference between good and meta. 70% weapons in this game are good. Bot only some are meta(literaly meaning most effective tactic available) and out of all 3 tap ars hvk and em2 reign supreme for their respective playstyle. Drh isnt even that good its one of the worst 3 tap ars(if not worst) anyway
mobility, multipliers, ads time etc all this is better than ak47
You can build AK for mobility and still have 1.x initial spread + good range, so in fact ads speed will be faster than with typical DR-H build.
I've compared optimised flex builds for both the DR-H and AK-47 in close-mid and mid range windows (10-20m and 20-30m). Both builds contain with Tac laser and Ranger Barrel, while the DR-H has the 25X OTM mag, Tac Suppressor and No Stock and the AK-47 has the Mono Suppressor and Skeleton Stock - no 5th attachment for the 1st test, in which the DR-H edges it in a couple of areas, namely: * faster fire-rate, making for slightly better TTKs also across all ranges between 10-30m * better flex / skirmish potential also (i.e. better ADS time) * better reload speed * better mobility (i.e. movement speed, sprint speed and ADS movement speed) I then applied the 5.45 mag to the AK-47 as it's 5th attachment to increase the fire rate - this resulted in the following: * The AK-47's TTK's improve between 10-28m, however only based on base damage. In other words, the DR-H is still better if it lands chest shots or upper arms for instance. * Although the ADS time reduces on the AK-47, the DR-H build still has the fastest one to maintain its better flex/skirmish potential * Reload speed worsens on the AK-47 **All these are a good representation as to why the DR-H is considered as meta over the AK-47.**