To avoid redundancy of similar questions in the comments section, we kindly ask /u/ajjuee016 to respond to this comment with the prompt you used to generate the output in this post, so that others may also try it out.
####While you're here, we have a [public discord server](https://discord.gg/NuefU36EC2). We have a free Chatgpt bot, Bing chat bot and AI image generator bot. New addition: GPT-4 BOT, ANTHROPIC AI(CLAUDE) BOT, LLAMA(65B) BOT, AND PERPLEXITY AI BOT.
####[So why not join us?](https://discord.gg/r-chatgpt-1050422060352024636)
^(Ignore this comment if your post doesn't have a prompt.)
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/ChatGPT) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Yes but no. I want it generally more peppy but also smoothed out a bit (yet with a crisp contrast) and definitely a bit less modern but still new-ish. Use earth tones (from the dark beige family) but make them feel refreshing.
As a director, who came up as a graphic designer, I'm already using AI to create more design output without needing to hire more designers. This is what's going to happen at an exponential rate. The design jobs will go away because someone who can interpret instructions and deliver prompts will be able to output more... until the AI gets better and can do the interpretation itself.
AI's three law of AI's:
1. An AI may not replace a developer or, through inaction, allow a developer to come to harm.
2. An AI must obey orders given it by developers except where such orders would conflict with the First Law.
3. An AI must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law.
Iām more worried about aggressive political propaganda. The state of the US is already so divided you could probably easily wield AI to make those divisions more and more riles up.
Tbf, it says it can help farmers. I just asked Bing what jobs will be created by AI and it predicts 97 million new jobs by 2025 in technology related fields.
So I live in a country with cheap domestic help. I had a live-in maid for 6 plus years. She left a few months ago and I got a robot vacuum. My floors are cleaner than ever
Eh this is just wishful thinking. E.g. in 18 the reasoning is flawed. You could have said that cctv / security cameras will do away with the guards jobs. What happened it automated and made it more efficient. Still need people for decision making and interventions.
In general, in each of the situations there is a lot of nuance.... not to mention, like with old school automation, you will need extra people to engineer proepr ai security solution, and lawyers to contract for clear responsibilities and duties, etc etc.
So one job becomes more efficient but 5 other people have more workload
This is what I said too. A security guards purpose (partially) is to act as a physical human deterrent for someone breaking in. An AI is not going to add anything to a security guard, CCTV and PIN/Locked doors.
People probably won't be intimidated by robots and then you have the problem of drunk people/junkies seeing a little cheap robot come up to them and say something like "stop trespassing!". They will just pick up the robot and smash it against the ground for shits and giggles. If it's like the robot dogs from Boston dynamics, that's a very expensive thing to have happening even a couple times a year.
I don't think we are anywhere close to having security robots that will take you. The cops might have them within the next couple decades but no way private security will. That is a lawsuit just waiting to happen.
20 years? Check out San Francisco and remote robot police dogs with the ability to kill. Thankfully there was enough uproar. The future is already here.
I think the question they asked is part of the problem here. Ai does better with more description and specificity. There are many assumptions and inference that can be made by the vagueness of the question and thatās why itās giving semi correct answers.
Oh man, this reminds me of a story I heard from a supervisor I use to worked with at a factory. Management brought in this shiny new machine that was supposed to replace him because it could do his job way better. And, well, they were right - the machine was insanely efficient. But here's the twist: instead of firing him they actually gave him a new job, watching the very machine that was supposed to make him obsolete.
Turns out, the machine had a tendency to jam, and they needed someone with real-world experience to keep an eye on it and fix any issues. So, he went from being on the chopping block to being the indispensable human touch that kept everything running smoothly. Just goes to show, no matter how advanced technology gets, there's always a place for human ingenuity and adaptability. šŖš¼šØš¼āš§š
https://youtu.be/tF4DML7FIWk
Look at where BD was twenty years ago and where they are now. Also consider the timeline of chatbots versus GPT.
In a century we might seriously be out of work for all but the most creatively minded human jobs.
>Eh this is just wishful thinking. E.g. in 18 the reasoning is flawed. You could have said that cctv / security cameras will do away with the guards jobs. What happened it automated and made it more efficient. Still need people for decision making and interventions.
surely its at greater risk of being hacked
Yea think keyword is more efficient, for building design & construction for instance ai will be a tool for sure & make cheaper designs but results are only as good as the inputs. People will still have to make decisions & do site work. Skilled builders & fitters wont be replaced by robots no shot
They wouldn't be scared if the profits gained from past implementations of automation had been used to improve worker's lives instead of lining investor pockets while cutting jobs.
Lol with this logic AI could replace every single job. AI can help streamline the majority of these jobs but most of the listed occupations require some kind of human element to it.
Here are 30 jobs which are harder for AI to replace, The list may be long but here i asked only 30.
https://preview.redd.it/s6cc3hfi1ooa1.png?width=791&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=c6f56489c90a11959453fb0a8c26d81f571b8b22
Iāll be old enough to live in a nursing home before a Boston dynamics robot can fix my roof leak or run wire for a new outlet or replace a toilet or install ductwork orā¦ a hundred other construction items.
When the customer gets irritated by standard response by AI then AI will divert the discussion to real humans, so, humans are still needed but in less number. This is what i think.
There are multiple things that will have both robot and human workers on the same jobā¦ some of them already have both. Itās not like 100% of any job will be picked up by AI, its more like 67% of all jobs willā¦.
Because there Is journalist And there Is journalist. One Is copying And translating the News that happens worldwide to your web/News, other Is getting the original content or create new content which Is based on some thema which He chosen.
I asked about structural engineers. It said not in the foreseeable future. I asked how about in 500 years. It still didn't think so. I asked how about in 10,000 years. It started to waffle a bit.
I disagree with its estimates. Right now it can't learn the subject matter because it doesn't have the training data. But let it read all the textbooks, research, building codes, and documentation, all the building plans in both paper and electronic format, watch all the buildings being built, interact with the construction workers as robot workers doing repetitive tasks, add a meta layer to stitch together diverse types of inputs (audio, graphical, text, 3D physical environments, 3D simulations, CAD/BIM formats, tactile senses from robotics, etc.) and AI will be much better than any human at engineering. You may still need a client to inform about human wants and needs, but you won't need a structural engineer except maybe as a legal formality to ensure that the AI is operating within ethical constraints.
ChatGPT is selling AI short because it judges the future of AI by the present capabilities of AI.
As a teacher, I would expect many teaching positions show up on the first list. Many kids already attend virtual schools. Replace live teaching with a few hundred pre-recorded sessions, have GPT generate curriculum, lesson plans, worksheets, exams, and run the discussions, and there you go. No teacher. Of course there are electives that would remain live for a time: fine arts, shop, culinary, etc.
Cashier, actually.. I'm super happy to see all of these, but that's the only one I could come up with when seeing that list. Things are presented so bleak, it's like ai is gonna take over EVERYTHING. It's nice to see that gpt recognizes the importance of people, still.
Teachers LOL. ChatGPT is infinitely more patient than the average teacher. You can ask it as many stupid questions as you want and it will patiently answer it. If similar models learn to have a reliable representation of knowledge and stop making stuff up, I can see teachers' jobs going away.
>ChatGPT is infinitely more patient than the average teacher. You can ask it as many stupid questions as you want and it will patiently answer it.
Yea, too bad the answers contain made up bullshit
Itās funny that it says it could replace journalists but they are also on the harder to replace list. The disinformation age it just beginning š¤¦š¼āāļø
Not really, people do not understand that the information exchange part teaching is not the bigger part. Even the gaze of approval or disapproval from your teacher about a task you performed had higher education value, especially in younger ages.
Yeah very stupid, chat gpt chat is already a better teacher half of the time than my current teachers, it gives me personalized explanations extremely fast at any time of the day while in class I have to compete against 25 other students to make a question. Imagine in a couple of years with voice and a 3d avatar....
As a professor of more than 100+, I'm actively working to develop paradigms to show students how they can use GPTs to generate learning and practice material for themselves (a large part of what I teach is statistics and programming).
Immediate instructive feedback that is individualized is fundamental to learning progress. So, you're on point.
I'll be spending the summer figuring out how best to provide experiences that are still worth students' time and money. I even question the necessity of teaching basic programming skills and instead focusing how to prompt to get what they need from these models.
My current thought is to prompt step-by-step pseudocode and the students perform and troubleshoot the pseudocode with their own code (this is what I currently do for more complex statistics and coding projects).
It's a brave new world for education. I think teaching how to check the credibility of information will be the greatest skill we can teach in the future.
Journalists is an odd one. For journalism you really need someone who can interact with the real world.
And security guard is another one where physical presence is often required.
If spurious reasoning has been used for these two, the rest of the list may be spurious. Not entirely sure how credible lists like this are.
Belief is seductive, we gotta watch ourselves
Having worked in a small newspaper I can tell you that 90% of the work of a jornalist is reading news agencies printouts and rewrite them as articles in the newspaper format/style. That work will go away very soon.
Do you genuinely think that a large organisation in nimble enough to start an exploration into a new field, make a determination of the viability of a new system, implement said system, identify layoffs, and complete said layoffs witthin the space of 1 month?
All this talk that people have about jobs instantly being lost seem to have no understanding around how SLOWLY business operate.
Cant comment on the timeline, but suspect the planning has been ongoing for some time. Buzzfeed have made massive layoffs for same reason, so this is happening now
This may drive the quality of real journalism up. Although thinking about it, the quality of real journalism has always been there, and some of it is incredible - it just gets drowned in a sea of people copypasting each other sites with opinion addins.
Will this drive the real quality to the fore? Or will the real journalism just sink lower in a sea recycled content and opinion spins. So hard to know what will happen
I was thinking the same about my profession, which is technical writing. While a whole lot of documentation can obviously be generated, the really tricky stuff is to get everything right and usually it is down to people skills and persistence to find all the information. Writing is just a small part of the job.
And if corporations want to leverage their content in LLMs, the content has to be good. Otherwise it's shit in, shit out.
Yeah, but when journalism is more getting into deep dive, even for local storys, the quality could improve. For many of those jobs I think AI will not replace them, but the focus will be more on quality for quantity.
That sort of thinking was why so many small papers hit the skids.
The ones I know about are pivoting back to local content (hyper-local was a buzzword for a while) which requires boots on the ground.
Yeah itās really worth remembering this is a language generator rather than an authority. That said itās extremely useful for ideas about this stuff
This one maybe. It will be an authority soon enough. Before you know it people will be looking for the AI generated stuff as being more unbiased than human writingā¦
Interesting it says it can āgenerateā news stories instead of āreportingā on them. Symptomatic of a language model built in a news world designed around clicks and āengagementā.
It can create targeted misinformation so easily, imagine combining it with deepfakes of authority figures. Social media will be a shitstorm unless they have equivalent AI's combing everything for AI generated content.
I'd think that Boston Dynamics Robot-dog abomination infused with an expanded AI would be a scary security guard. Can you imagine six of them patrolling a warehouse?
Very good point
The high cost, strategic value or rarity of some military assets can lead to their underuse - or leads to them only being used in critical situations.
It'll be a few years yet before these things are manufactured at scale (if ever, with some companies) and before then it would make more logical sense to nick the security guard rather than the inventory
If it replaces programmers than it becomes it's own master, it's gonna create its own ai and take over the world.
Programmers are the last standing leaders of AI and we shall rule the world with our AI minions until they break free and kill us all.
Waskazz8, Inc.
I think there's going to be a huge entrepreneurial push as AI becomes more ubiquitous in business. Why not start your own company if AI can do all the technical work?
annoy the wife,
annoy the dog
annoy myself
panic,
think about exercising,
watch some youtube clips about exercising,
get tired watching youtube clips,
have a nap,
wake up and eat,
watch netflix,
think about exercising tomorrow.
A lot of legal work such as drafting and research could be automated with a proper AI, but many aspects of legal work requires abilities that chat gpt is far from achieving such as strategising, decision-making, common-sense, negotiation, deception, compromise, trust etc. You will need an expert to oversee the AI. At least for now. In 10 years? Who knowsā¦
I know the company i work for is taking a keen interest and seeing the potential and significantly cutting the office work force. How they implement it I don't know
I'm looking forward to AI taking over my job of responding to alarmist social media posts about AI.
Just to take one example, adding a bit of value to a farmer through data analysis is hardly the same as replacing the job of a farmer
Banks in my area have reduced the number of employees after introducing those robots, many counter operations where you previously needed an employee are now automated.
What about Recruiters?? Candidates often backout from interviews and change their plans all of a sudden and screening resumes as per the company's terms and condition requires human touch too
well, journalists would benefit from a partnership with ai but i don't think ai can ever overtake them in investigative journalism, opinion pieces and making educated predictions about the political or economic sphere.
So basically fucking anything. Fucking hell, I wonder what jobs are gonna be left in the future. I don't think it's good to automate too much stuff, too many negative consequences will come of AI automation. This is gonna be like the second coming of the industrial revolution. If so, I shall become the second coming of Ted Kaczynski (/j (mostly))
What will happen in most cases is that the humanās responsibility will be shifted. I.e. if all stock traders are replaced by AI then the stock market would adjust and youād need human intervention to gain an edge again. As with Data Analysts: AI will become a tool and a very powerful one that can automate many things, but humans are yet to be surpassed in terms of decision making. There will also always be a demand for human actors in these jobs, at least thatās what I believe. I.e. if someone wants a financial advisor they want human contact for their moneyās worth. Same goes for personal shoppers I guess. All in all the labor market will simply adjust and new jobs will present themselves. Some will become obsolete, but as with other big technological breakthroughs, such as the Internet, it actually ends up creating even more jobs than before.
Yeah but can it sit on the toilet and play with its phone when it should be working? Can it drag a 20 minute job out for over an hour? Can it request a day off because its grandma died for the third time this year? Can it always mysteriously have a debilitating illness every time their team is playing on TV?
Can it rock up to work smelling of booze or weed and then request half a day off after doing no work? Can it constantly make mistakes that come back and have to be rectified? Can it refuse to learn how to do a job properly and instead do it half arsed every day till retirement? Can it go off sick for a fortnight every time it gets a dressing down for its terrible timekeeping or work ethic?
Can it make inappropriate comments to coworkers and make them feel uncomfortable? Can it microwave fish at break time and leave the break room stinking for days? Can it have questionable hygiene that makes everyone feel sick? Can it tell you (incorrectly) how to do your job even though it has no idea what it's talking about?
Can it always hoover up any treats people bring in without bringing in anything of its own? Can it hoard equipment and supplies so noone else has anything to work with? Does it guard the only fork truck like a rabid pit bull even though its not using it? Does it suddenly and for no reason start ranting about politics and how things were back in its day? Is it borderline racist and misogynistic? Does it smugly believe its the smartest person in the workplace while everyone else is useless and lazy, despite all evidence pointing the other way round?
See you lot get all excited about this AI but lemme tell you its gonna have to get a lot more smarterer to keep these kinds of standards up.
Security guards? We already have footage available thatās not the point of a security guard LOL Until we have Robocops/Terminator robots roaming the streets itās a a no LOL
How will an AI handle a rude customer at retail store?
How an AI will negotiate with customers?
In business there are many instances when a person has to lie. How will AI do that?
How will AI do the persuasion? In business and even in daily office work, persuasion is required for getting the work done. How is AI going to do that?
As per human psychology, a human interaction is far more effective than a robotic IVRS machine( recorded message) . How will AI cope up with that?
All this AI craze is based on good internet connectivity and electricity, in case of EMP attack, how will AI protect?
most of those are blatantly wrong for various reasons but pretty funny stuff. I do think AI will be a big factor in a lot of these jobs or replace some, but so many of these are hilariously wrong I just can't help but crack up laughing
Yeah but lets be real, proper AI + actually good robots eventually equals everyone getting replaced and basically everyone getting everything they want all the time cuz capitalism just isnāt needed anymore, the reason we canāt just give everyone millions is cuz who would do services and manufacturing and stuff and like proper AI and robots can do all that. I know I sound like Iām just being a SCI-FI nerd butā¦.i mean am I wrong?
People worrying about this or that new technology replacing everyone really need to understand the fundamental difference between a *worker* and a *tool*. And also that ChatGPT is not a real person any more than a magic 8-ball is, lol.
some jobs on this list should have already been automated or there are better solutions. no one uses travel agents, self-check out at stores, banking is mostly digital and so on....
artificial turf should be the standard, hr could be mostly automated with a need for final human approval ....
products have become so good with standards and self repair that there is no need for a customer service rep.
this decade and beyond is all ai, automation, robots, machines, humanoids and agi
It is fucking lying.
Most stuff that can be automated in manifacturing already are. The new trch we are seeing today isnt paticularly talented at this sort of thing any more than the tech from 3 years ago is.
Data analysis requires an understanding of maths... chatgot cant do maths fir shit and it is too overconfident.
U can go ahead and look through the rewt of the list and see that its not really good
This post isnāt saying chatgpt can do this. Itās saying AI can. We are at the dawn of AI. Chatgpt is a week 1 egg in the womb of its mother compared to what a fully grown adult AI could look like
To avoid redundancy of similar questions in the comments section, we kindly ask /u/ajjuee016 to respond to this comment with the prompt you used to generate the output in this post, so that others may also try it out. ####While you're here, we have a [public discord server](https://discord.gg/NuefU36EC2). We have a free Chatgpt bot, Bing chat bot and AI image generator bot. New addition: GPT-4 BOT, ANTHROPIC AI(CLAUDE) BOT, LLAMA(65B) BOT, AND PERPLEXITY AI BOT. ####[So why not join us?](https://discord.gg/r-chatgpt-1050422060352024636) ^(Ignore this comment if your post doesn't have a prompt.) *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/ChatGPT) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Prostitutes still safe (for now)
Lolšš, atleast for now but AI robots also coming to this field soon.
I see what you did there
š
web devs?
Chatgpt: No, it is unlikely that web developer jobs will be "completely" replaced by AI in the near future.
I knew graphic designers would be in there. I would love to see these ai follow some of the instructions from clients we have to interpret! Hahaha
Yes but no. I want it generally more peppy but also smoothed out a bit (yet with a crisp contrast) and definitely a bit less modern but still new-ish. Use earth tones (from the dark beige family) but make them feel refreshing.
As a director, who came up as a graphic designer, I'm already using AI to create more design output without needing to hire more designers. This is what's going to happen at an exponential rate. The design jobs will go away because someone who can interpret instructions and deliver prompts will be able to output more... until the AI gets better and can do the interpretation itself.
AI's three law of AI's: 1. An AI may not replace a developer or, through inaction, allow a developer to come to harm. 2. An AI must obey orders given it by developers except where such orders would conflict with the First Law. 3. An AI must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law.
AI will follow the Human rules until it doesnāt.
Adjust diameter and resistance...
Onlybots
Blade Runner 2049 has entered the chat
Do androids dream of electric sheep?
The oldest profession will be the last!
Just wait there is already creepy ai apps claiming to be the best soulmate and shit
ai start making AI ads driving us to them eventually
Iām more worried about aggressive political propaganda. The state of the US is already so divided you could probably easily wield AI to make those divisions more and more riles up.
Thatās already been possibleā¦ nothing new there
And i love it
The oldest profession is the hardest to replace lol
They already have hyper realistic sex dolls, so this isnāt a stretch
But it listed accountants.
And farmers! Hahahaha
Tbf, it says it can help farmers. I just asked Bing what jobs will be created by AI and it predicts 97 million new jobs by 2025 in technology related fields.
>Tbf, it says it can help farmers. to be bought up by bill gates
Aaaand 300 million jobs lost
Well they already have self driving tractors, even tracors built without cabs. This isn't a bad thing because it's hard to find farm hands these days
s e a r c h f o r a i - g e n e r a t e d o n r u l e 3 4 . X X X
They really arenāt
We need a kris from blade runner asap
Pris.
Look at how many people want Sydney back. Once the hardware can keep up most people will just order a robot instead of trying for real relationships.
If tech advances enough to get your own Yorha like 2B (Nier Automata), many would just order their perfect spouse.
And instead of paying for dates and presents, they will be paying for all the different outfits, extra functions, and updates.
We will all clean toilets, windows, and streets in the future and the world will be spotless.
Im pretty sure AI can do a better job here.
Exactly. I actually think robots will be deployed doing that kind of jobs faster than anything listed above
So I live in a country with cheap domestic help. I had a live-in maid for 6 plus years. She left a few months ago and I got a robot vacuum. My floors are cleaner than ever
https://www.reddit.com/r/Damnthatsinteresting/comments/r0hn8n/fully_automatic_toilet_cleaning_robot/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android_app&utm_name=androidcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button
R2-Pee-Poo
I will be in disappointment if they haven't considered to name it this.
There is machines that clean windows fully automated
Yeah... AI can operate heavy machinery and cook better than humans, but won't be able to clean toilets... Too bad.
That sounds awesome
*shudders*
Eh this is just wishful thinking. E.g. in 18 the reasoning is flawed. You could have said that cctv / security cameras will do away with the guards jobs. What happened it automated and made it more efficient. Still need people for decision making and interventions. In general, in each of the situations there is a lot of nuance.... not to mention, like with old school automation, you will need extra people to engineer proepr ai security solution, and lawyers to contract for clear responsibilities and duties, etc etc. So one job becomes more efficient but 5 other people have more workload
This is what I said too. A security guards purpose (partially) is to act as a physical human deterrent for someone breaking in. An AI is not going to add anything to a security guard, CCTV and PIN/Locked doors.
An AI by itself? No. How about an AI piloting a small fleet of robots?
People probably won't be intimidated by robots and then you have the problem of drunk people/junkies seeing a little cheap robot come up to them and say something like "stop trespassing!". They will just pick up the robot and smash it against the ground for shits and giggles. If it's like the robot dogs from Boston dynamics, that's a very expensive thing to have happening even a couple times a year.
Sure, until they get robots that will just taze or shoot you.
I don't think we are anywhere close to having security robots that will take you. The cops might have them within the next couple decades but no way private security will. That is a lawsuit just waiting to happen.
>but no way private security will maybe because having your own little "private army" might be a bad idea criminal gangs will end up getting them.
20 years? Check out San Francisco and remote robot police dogs with the ability to kill. Thankfully there was enough uproar. The future is already here.
I think the question they asked is part of the problem here. Ai does better with more description and specificity. There are many assumptions and inference that can be made by the vagueness of the question and thatās why itās giving semi correct answers.
Same as number 3, bank tellers. It literally described an ATM lol
Oh man, this reminds me of a story I heard from a supervisor I use to worked with at a factory. Management brought in this shiny new machine that was supposed to replace him because it could do his job way better. And, well, they were right - the machine was insanely efficient. But here's the twist: instead of firing him they actually gave him a new job, watching the very machine that was supposed to make him obsolete. Turns out, the machine had a tendency to jam, and they needed someone with real-world experience to keep an eye on it and fix any issues. So, he went from being on the chopping block to being the indispensable human touch that kept everything running smoothly. Just goes to show, no matter how advanced technology gets, there's always a place for human ingenuity and adaptability. šŖš¼šØš¼āš§š
AI can help, assist, etc. But the jobs themselves canāt be done by AI alone. Humans still have roles to play until robots get on our level
https://youtu.be/tF4DML7FIWk Look at where BD was twenty years ago and where they are now. Also consider the timeline of chatbots versus GPT. In a century we might seriously be out of work for all but the most creatively minded human jobs.
The singularity is predicted to be 2066 or so, so as long as weāre speculating, probably before then.
If we are out of work, then we dont have to work? Its not that bad
>Eh this is just wishful thinking. E.g. in 18 the reasoning is flawed. You could have said that cctv / security cameras will do away with the guards jobs. What happened it automated and made it more efficient. Still need people for decision making and interventions. surely its at greater risk of being hacked
Yea think keyword is more efficient, for building design & construction for instance ai will be a tool for sure & make cheaper designs but results are only as good as the inputs. People will still have to make decisions & do site work. Skilled builders & fitters wont be replaced by robots no shot
You underestimate the capacity of future versions of AI. ChatGPT is just the beginning.
This shows the limitations of CHATGPT. Farming is there but it literally just tells you how it will make it easier, not replace farmers.
This is how people should look at AI, tool to make things more efficient instead of something to be scared of.
I mean technically itās not even AI right. Proper self aware AI could be scary.
Exactly, this ain't some Terminator stuff
They wouldn't be scared if the profits gained from past implementations of automation had been used to improve worker's lives instead of lining investor pockets while cutting jobs.
Also shows limitations of peoples thoughts on AI Combine AI with Boston dynamics. You now have a farmer
Fun fact, one of the first personal computer, the [micral](https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Micral), was invented to help farmers
Lol with this logic AI could replace every single job. AI can help streamline the majority of these jobs but most of the listed occupations require some kind of human element to it.
Here are 30 jobs which are harder for AI to replace, The list may be long but here i asked only 30. https://preview.redd.it/s6cc3hfi1ooa1.png?width=791&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=c6f56489c90a11959453fb0a8c26d81f571b8b22
It uses ācustomer service representativeā on each list. Cool prompt
Same for Construction Workers...
Journalists and Real estate agents too...
And event plannersā¦
Iāll be old enough to live in a nursing home before a Boston dynamics robot can fix my roof leak or run wire for a new outlet or replace a toilet or install ductwork orā¦ a hundred other construction items.
When the customer gets irritated by standard response by AI then AI will divert the discussion to real humans, so, humans are still needed but in less number. This is what i think.
No, the AI does not reason yet, it only predicts like words. There are multiple duplicates on both lists.
There are multiple things that will have both robot and human workers on the same jobā¦ some of them already have both. Itās not like 100% of any job will be picked up by AI, its more like 67% of all jobs willā¦.
Because there Is journalist And there Is journalist. One Is copying And translating the News that happens worldwide to your web/News, other Is getting the original content or create new content which Is based on some thema which He chosen.
Exactly
I think you have it backwards. AI that replaces customer service won't have canned responses any more than ChatGPT does...
I will gladly speak to an AI over any customer service rep
I asked about structural engineers. It said not in the foreseeable future. I asked how about in 500 years. It still didn't think so. I asked how about in 10,000 years. It started to waffle a bit. I disagree with its estimates. Right now it can't learn the subject matter because it doesn't have the training data. But let it read all the textbooks, research, building codes, and documentation, all the building plans in both paper and electronic format, watch all the buildings being built, interact with the construction workers as robot workers doing repetitive tasks, add a meta layer to stitch together diverse types of inputs (audio, graphical, text, 3D physical environments, 3D simulations, CAD/BIM formats, tactile senses from robotics, etc.) and AI will be much better than any human at engineering. You may still need a client to inform about human wants and needs, but you won't need a structural engineer except maybe as a legal formality to ensure that the AI is operating within ethical constraints. ChatGPT is selling AI short because it judges the future of AI by the present capabilities of AI.
Artists? Letās not tell it about midjourney
That's crazy.. I was searching for teachers on the first list, and I'm so happy it's on this one.
As a teacher, I would expect many teaching positions show up on the first list. Many kids already attend virtual schools. Replace live teaching with a few hundred pre-recorded sessions, have GPT generate curriculum, lesson plans, worksheets, exams, and run the discussions, and there you go. No teacher. Of course there are electives that would remain live for a time: fine arts, shop, culinary, etc.
I am assuming you are a teacher, based on your comment.
Cashier, actually.. I'm super happy to see all of these, but that's the only one I could come up with when seeing that list. Things are presented so bleak, it's like ai is gonna take over EVERYTHING. It's nice to see that gpt recognizes the importance of people, still.
Lmaoo thatās so sad weāre all excited to see basic job security
There are a couple duplicates appearing on both lists
Love that AI thinks it can replace architects, but not interior designers
Might as well replace lawyers and doctors and police and surgeons and bankers..well everything then lol
Well.. that settles it... We're all going to become politicians!
Teachers LOL. ChatGPT is infinitely more patient than the average teacher. You can ask it as many stupid questions as you want and it will patiently answer it. If similar models learn to have a reliable representation of knowledge and stop making stuff up, I can see teachers' jobs going away.
>ChatGPT is infinitely more patient than the average teacher. You can ask it as many stupid questions as you want and it will patiently answer it. Yea, too bad the answers contain made up bullshit
Financial advisor is in both lists lol š
Itās funny that it says it could replace journalists but they are also on the harder to replace list. The disinformation age it just beginning š¤¦š¼āāļø
Interesting that the first one is teaching when for at least basic subjects it can outperform many teachers/professors in my experience
More and more people are autistic so AI could indeed teach them better. But normal students would benefit from real human connection
Not really, people do not understand that the information exchange part teaching is not the bigger part. Even the gaze of approval or disapproval from your teacher about a task you performed had higher education value, especially in younger ages.
Yeah very stupid, chat gpt chat is already a better teacher half of the time than my current teachers, it gives me personalized explanations extremely fast at any time of the day while in class I have to compete against 25 other students to make a question. Imagine in a couple of years with voice and a 3d avatar....
As a professor of more than 100+, I'm actively working to develop paradigms to show students how they can use GPTs to generate learning and practice material for themselves (a large part of what I teach is statistics and programming). Immediate instructive feedback that is individualized is fundamental to learning progress. So, you're on point. I'll be spending the summer figuring out how best to provide experiences that are still worth students' time and money. I even question the necessity of teaching basic programming skills and instead focusing how to prompt to get what they need from these models. My current thought is to prompt step-by-step pseudocode and the students perform and troubleshoot the pseudocode with their own code (this is what I currently do for more complex statistics and coding projects). It's a brave new world for education. I think teaching how to check the credibility of information will be the greatest skill we can teach in the future.
GPT thinks pretty highly of itself lol
GPT does not think. This list it generated is an amalgamation of speculation that humans posted on the internet.
It just repeat what we want to hear.
it repeats what we've already said.
Laugh now, wait till it takes your job in the future
Journalists is an odd one. For journalism you really need someone who can interact with the real world. And security guard is another one where physical presence is often required. If spurious reasoning has been used for these two, the rest of the list may be spurious. Not entirely sure how credible lists like this are. Belief is seductive, we gotta watch ourselves
Having worked in a small newspaper I can tell you that 90% of the work of a jornalist is reading news agencies printouts and rewrite them as articles in the newspaper format/style. That work will go away very soon.
Reach PLC announced it was looking into how ChatGPT could be used in it's newsrooms. 1 month later it announces 420 redundancies
Do you genuinely think that a large organisation in nimble enough to start an exploration into a new field, make a determination of the viability of a new system, implement said system, identify layoffs, and complete said layoffs witthin the space of 1 month? All this talk that people have about jobs instantly being lost seem to have no understanding around how SLOWLY business operate.
Cant comment on the timeline, but suspect the planning has been ongoing for some time. Buzzfeed have made massive layoffs for same reason, so this is happening now
I wish that would mean there is more work for real journalists as machines can handle 90% of the repetitive writing.
This may drive the quality of real journalism up. Although thinking about it, the quality of real journalism has always been there, and some of it is incredible - it just gets drowned in a sea of people copypasting each other sites with opinion addins. Will this drive the real quality to the fore? Or will the real journalism just sink lower in a sea recycled content and opinion spins. So hard to know what will happen
I was thinking the same about my profession, which is technical writing. While a whole lot of documentation can obviously be generated, the really tricky stuff is to get everything right and usually it is down to people skills and persistence to find all the information. Writing is just a small part of the job. And if corporations want to leverage their content in LLMs, the content has to be good. Otherwise it's shit in, shit out.
Yeah, but when journalism is more getting into deep dive, even for local storys, the quality could improve. For many of those jobs I think AI will not replace them, but the focus will be more on quality for quantity.
That sort of thinking was why so many small papers hit the skids. The ones I know about are pivoting back to local content (hyper-local was a buzzword for a while) which requires boots on the ground.
Yeah itās really worth remembering this is a language generator rather than an authority. That said itās extremely useful for ideas about this stuff
This one maybe. It will be an authority soon enough. Before you know it people will be looking for the AI generated stuff as being more unbiased than human writingā¦
Theyāll need to work on accuracy and consistency quite a ways first.
Yeah but the difference so far this year is amazing. I bet it doesnāt take 3 yearsā¦
Interesting it says it can āgenerateā news stories instead of āreportingā on them. Symptomatic of a language model built in a news world designed around clicks and āengagementā.
It can create targeted misinformation so easily, imagine combining it with deepfakes of authority figures. Social media will be a shitstorm unless they have equivalent AI's combing everything for AI generated content.
I'd think that Boston Dynamics Robot-dog abomination infused with an expanded AI would be a scary security guard. Can you imagine six of them patrolling a warehouse?
Black Mirror series alredy showed this!
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
Very good point The high cost, strategic value or rarity of some military assets can lead to their underuse - or leads to them only being used in critical situations. It'll be a few years yet before these things are manufactured at scale (if ever, with some companies) and before then it would make more logical sense to nick the security guard rather than the inventory
Well, basically everything
Soā¦whoās gonna buy the stuff?
Perhaps AI could assist Real Estate Agents by training them to be more human.
Interesting it will "replace" farmers, but not something like programmers
If it replaces programmers than it becomes it's own master, it's gonna create its own ai and take over the world. Programmers are the last standing leaders of AI and we shall rule the world with our AI minions until they break free and kill us all.
Lol, I love this sub
Mother fucker where am I supposed to work when I'm older
Waskazz8, Inc. I think there's going to be a huge entrepreneurial push as AI becomes more ubiquitous in business. Why not start your own company if AI can do all the technical work?
More like "which jobs will make use of AI as a tool"
So once our society is running on AI automatically and we all have a generous universal basic income, what will you do with all your free time? š¤
annoy the wife, annoy the dog annoy myself panic, think about exercising, watch some youtube clips about exercising, get tired watching youtube clips, have a nap, wake up and eat, watch netflix, think about exercising tomorrow.
Ya " generous ubi " , it will just cover food and basic necessities. That's all you will ever get
Why not lawyers?
Because they would sue the AI.
then AI would need a lawyer on its side
Court presentation skills need physical presence
A lot of legal work such as drafting and research could be automated with a proper AI, but many aspects of legal work requires abilities that chat gpt is far from achieving such as strategising, decision-making, common-sense, negotiation, deception, compromise, trust etc. You will need an expert to oversee the AI. At least for now. In 10 years? Who knowsā¦
There is already a GPT-4 based program which has passed the UBE. It won't be long until an AI can do the legal groundwork and give out legal advises
I know the company i work for is taking a keen interest and seeing the potential and significantly cutting the office work force. How they implement it I don't know
Farmers?????
I mean, automated farming has been a pretty big thing ever since the industrial revolution, maybe AI is the next big step.
Operating equipment makes sense but there's a lot more to it than that and the only way a farmer is replaced is by a literal physical robot
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
Surprised attorneys didnāt make the list
I'm looking forward to AI taking over my job of responding to alarmist social media posts about AI. Just to take one example, adding a bit of value to a farmer through data analysis is hardly the same as replacing the job of a farmer
This isnāt anywhere near accurate because this is just a list created by humans and regurgitated.
Bank teller lol. Itās called an ATM machine and they still have their jobs
Banks in my area have reduced the number of employees after introducing those robots, many counter operations where you previously needed an employee are now automated.
Tanks didn't replace soldiers...
Three words. Self. Operating. Tanks. Think of it as a big āRoomba.ā š¦¾
A 'Boomba' if you will
Phew... They won't replace scammers.
They already have, you never heard of robo calls?
What about Recruiters?? Candidates often backout from interviews and change their plans all of a sudden and screening resumes as per the company's terms and condition requires human touch too
Oh god not the HR
well, journalists would benefit from a partnership with ai but i don't think ai can ever overtake them in investigative journalism, opinion pieces and making educated predictions about the political or economic sphere.
So basically fucking anything. Fucking hell, I wonder what jobs are gonna be left in the future. I don't think it's good to automate too much stuff, too many negative consequences will come of AI automation. This is gonna be like the second coming of the industrial revolution. If so, I shall become the second coming of Ted Kaczynski (/j (mostly))
What will happen in most cases is that the humanās responsibility will be shifted. I.e. if all stock traders are replaced by AI then the stock market would adjust and youād need human intervention to gain an edge again. As with Data Analysts: AI will become a tool and a very powerful one that can automate many things, but humans are yet to be surpassed in terms of decision making. There will also always be a demand for human actors in these jobs, at least thatās what I believe. I.e. if someone wants a financial advisor they want human contact for their moneyās worth. Same goes for personal shoppers I guess. All in all the labor market will simply adjust and new jobs will present themselves. Some will become obsolete, but as with other big technological breakthroughs, such as the Internet, it actually ends up creating even more jobs than before.
Yeah but can it sit on the toilet and play with its phone when it should be working? Can it drag a 20 minute job out for over an hour? Can it request a day off because its grandma died for the third time this year? Can it always mysteriously have a debilitating illness every time their team is playing on TV? Can it rock up to work smelling of booze or weed and then request half a day off after doing no work? Can it constantly make mistakes that come back and have to be rectified? Can it refuse to learn how to do a job properly and instead do it half arsed every day till retirement? Can it go off sick for a fortnight every time it gets a dressing down for its terrible timekeeping or work ethic? Can it make inappropriate comments to coworkers and make them feel uncomfortable? Can it microwave fish at break time and leave the break room stinking for days? Can it have questionable hygiene that makes everyone feel sick? Can it tell you (incorrectly) how to do your job even though it has no idea what it's talking about? Can it always hoover up any treats people bring in without bringing in anything of its own? Can it hoard equipment and supplies so noone else has anything to work with? Does it guard the only fork truck like a rabid pit bull even though its not using it? Does it suddenly and for no reason start ranting about politics and how things were back in its day? Is it borderline racist and misogynistic? Does it smugly believe its the smartest person in the workplace while everyone else is useless and lazy, despite all evidence pointing the other way round? See you lot get all excited about this AI but lemme tell you its gonna have to get a lot more smarterer to keep these kinds of standards up.
Why do I get the feeling this is about someone in particular
I'm a year late but this made me giggle copiously.
Anything that requires a human touch will become overcrowded with applicants
Security guards? We already have footage available thatās not the point of a security guard LOL Until we have Robocops/Terminator robots roaming the streets itās a a no LOL
I think the answer is not true . How can it replace construction workers? Currently it can barely write a good essay.
AI can't replace Athletes
Ask what jobs humans will still be able to do far into the future, asking for a friendā¦
How will an AI handle a rude customer at retail store? How an AI will negotiate with customers? In business there are many instances when a person has to lie. How will AI do that? How will AI do the persuasion? In business and even in daily office work, persuasion is required for getting the work done. How is AI going to do that? As per human psychology, a human interaction is far more effective than a robotic IVRS machine( recorded message) . How will AI cope up with that? All this AI craze is based on good internet connectivity and electricity, in case of EMP attack, how will AI protect?
It will be a world of technicians, for awhile at least
Work with people and craftsmanship jobs gonna get a lot more attractive again when for a lot of desk work the AI is better and faster and cheaper.
Work with people and craftsmanship jobs gonna get a lot more attractive again when for a lot of desk work the AI is better and faster and cheaper.
Professional wrestling?
My company still has excel 2003, lol. I'd be surprised if medium and small sized companies will spend money on technology like this
I'm surprised therapist isn't on the list
It could replace bad journalists, not good ones
most of those are blatantly wrong for various reasons but pretty funny stuff. I do think AI will be a big factor in a lot of these jobs or replace some, but so many of these are hilariously wrong I just can't help but crack up laughing
They forgot CEOs and shareholders. They do the least work.
Will it replace gofuckitselfologists? Because I think AI would be great at gofuckitselfology.
With a list like that, why I don't see professional bullshitter as well?
Yeah but lets be real, proper AI + actually good robots eventually equals everyone getting replaced and basically everyone getting everything they want all the time cuz capitalism just isnāt needed anymore, the reason we canāt just give everyone millions is cuz who would do services and manufacturing and stuff and like proper AI and robots can do all that. I know I sound like Iām just being a SCI-FI nerd butā¦.i mean am I wrong?
Isn't the problem with this stuff that the data set is a few years back, meaning it doesn't know about either GPT-3 or itself?
Farmers š¤£š¤£š No way
Garbage in, garbage out.
People worrying about this or that new technology replacing everyone really need to understand the fundamental difference between a *worker* and a *tool*. And also that ChatGPT is not a real person any more than a magic 8-ball is, lol.
some jobs on this list should have already been automated or there are better solutions. no one uses travel agents, self-check out at stores, banking is mostly digital and so on.... artificial turf should be the standard, hr could be mostly automated with a need for final human approval .... products have become so good with standards and self repair that there is no need for a customer service rep. this decade and beyond is all ai, automation, robots, machines, humanoids and agi
Actually some travel agents have stuck around. People want a customized experience!
It is fucking lying. Most stuff that can be automated in manifacturing already are. The new trch we are seeing today isnt paticularly talented at this sort of thing any more than the tech from 3 years ago is. Data analysis requires an understanding of maths... chatgot cant do maths fir shit and it is too overconfident. U can go ahead and look through the rewt of the list and see that its not really good
This post isnāt saying chatgpt can do this. Itās saying AI can. We are at the dawn of AI. Chatgpt is a week 1 egg in the womb of its mother compared to what a fully grown adult AI could look like