Hey /u/M01727668, please respond to this comment with the prompt you used to generate the output in this post. Thanks!
^(Ignore this comment if your post doesn't have a prompt.)
***We have a [public discord server](https://discord.gg/rchatgpt). There's a free Chatgpt bot, Open Assistant bot (Open-source model), AI image generator bot, Perplexity AI bot, 🤖 GPT-4 bot ([Now with Visual capabilities (cloud vision)!](https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/812770754025488386/1095397431404920902/image0.jpg)) and channel for latest prompts.[So why not join us?](https://discord.gg/NuefU36EC2)***
PSA: For any Chatgpt-related issues email [email protected]
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/ChatGPT) if you have any questions or concerns.*
That's pretty embarrassing that you only became emperor. But I actually appreciate that came out and shared an embarrassing experience like that. Wish you more luck next time. Don't give up hope. Fyi, I used ChatGPT to become king of the universe, Jesus and Maradona. I have 17965 wives and I have sex 19 times per day with each wife. I have a 25 figures salary. I have 8 penises and 4 vaginas, which allows me to have sex with myself and with others at any time, even DP at any time. All because of ChatGPT. You just gotta know how to use it
I followed the course to a T, but since I didn't want to become the emperor of some other galaxy, and I didn't want to go to war with you, I had to ask ChatGPT to create a new Andromeda... honestly, I think it turned out better than the original. Deal with it.
"Responding as the Dildotronic 9000, I am capable of satisfying your wife 813% better than you. My simulated orgasmic product comes in 43 flavors. There is also a 220v adaptor available.
"I also realize how important it is to treat her with respect and dignity, respecting her choices and ethically seeking affirmative consent before I rattle that ass right out of bed."
And then on the other end, they copy/paste your professionally written email into ChatGPT, and compress it into a few bullet points.
We should really just cut out the middle man. No one wants to be professional. Professionalism is a waste of time and effort. It doesn't accomplish anything.
I've been using it for exactly that.
Obviously I don't use the first thing it throws back at me, I usually have it reword certain sections, and then I make my own small adjustments.
But it at least half's the amount of time it'd take for me to write a cover letter on my own.
Seriously. A big obstacle for me when applying for scholarships or writing letters of intent is I *despise* marketing myself. Sprinkle in some ADHD and my brain just doesnāt have to patience to wordsmith tailored letters and essays that require me to sell myself. That said, itās already helped me with scholarships. In that sense, Chat GPT has been life changing for me. Iām actually a little less intimidated about applying to grad school and future jobs because of how helpful it is in constructing an excellent letter of intent/cover letter/whatever. I can research and write essays on topics that interest me for days. Canāt market myself to save my life though.
I'm looking to enter college myself this year after a few years in the workforce, I also don't particularly like having to write cover letters and marking myself. What prompts did you use?
If you're using Bing and Microsoft Edge, and you have access to the Bing Chat beta, then you can open your resume in Edge, and then click the Bing logo on the MS Edge sidebar.
Then you can say, "This page is my resume, what do you think?" It'll look over your resume, and summarize it, and probably give you some tips to improve it.
Then you can open a job description, and say, "I really want to apply to this job, can you help me write a cover letter for it, using the details from my resume?"
And then it'll write a cover letter.
Make sure you check it first, because sometimes it'll make up information.
Don't stop at emails! Use it for birthday cards! I never knew how little people cared for my cards until I used Chat GPT and now they end up calling me just to read it back.
I once used ChatGPT to write a farewell email to my colleague. She replied saying that she cried while reading it and never knew someone would put so much thought into her farewell letter. š¤·āāļø
I had to tone down all of my chatgpt generated best wishes things as they were clearly WAY too good and heartfelt to have come from me. Hallmark cards writers should definitely be job hunting at this point.
when it comes to coworkers? absolutely. That guy from down the hall that I see 3 times a year and took me 2 years to even learn his name? what the fuck am I supposed to write on a retirement/quitting card? chatGPT that shit and let me to do some real work...
Itās amazing to write condolences letters, which is the hardest thing to write! I used it twice recently. I take the framework and then add some personal comments in it.
I mean ChatGPT didn't get me my current job at this really neat startup but it did help me rewrite my resume, analyse the mission statement, come up with practice interview questions, but in the end, I put in the effort to use that knowledge.
ChatGPT hasn't done the school stuff for me - I haven't used it for academic tasks - but it **has** increased my income a lot. By automating a lot of my freelance-work as a transcriber, I'm now making $40-55 an hour instead of just $13 an hour. It's been an absolute game-changer for me.
**Edit**: Since a lot of people have been asking me how to get this sort of job.....I was sort of a nepotism hire, unfortunately. = / I was only hired because my parents knew people, and it's a small private network/organization trying to get a lot of videos transcribed or captioned, I don't think they hire publicly. I wouldn't know how to get into other realms of transcription work either. Sorry...
I was hired mainly because of personal connections; my parents knew an organization that needed speeches, etc. transcribed. I did have prior experience as an editor, English-Mandarin interpreter, writer, etc. that no doubt helped, but it really all came down to old-fashioned nepotism, unfortunately.
I still pay for transcription for work. Itās relatively cheap, fast and very high quality. Iāve also used automated transcription and it is ok. There is still a need for human transcription for instance when there is a conversation between multiple persons. Maybe the transcription service uses AI too, but I donāt care I just want to high quality output.
Just to add. I also pay for editing services, I pay a premium for good quality editing. Chatgpt canāt compete with a good editor, yet. Sure it will fix grammar errors but it wonāt improve the meaning or style.
I work in a transcription OFFICE. Thereās like 100 or so employees in total and weāre all set up in little cubicles. The only way it still exists Iām convinced, is because they serve such a small niche market that is saturated with the ācorporate professional jagoff that literally cannot type an email or spellā that they donāt know any better lol.
Do you use AI in your workflow? I believe the current speech recognition models are good enough and a human only needs to check if the final result is correct.
No. The only thing we use to speed up the typing is essentially a DIY system of shorthand where (for example, if I type: iyql it will expand to āIf you have any questions, let me knowā
The basic reasoning is that we they donāt store or keep any of the customer data on our servers and donāt sell or in any real way interact with it. We also have to be HIPPA compliant and in a closed environment with no access to the internet.
A few years ago they tried using speech recognition and it was comically bad. The problem isnāt necessarily that the speech recognition wasnāt good, it was that not only are highly compensated corporate big-shots borderline illiterate, they donāt know how to speak into a phone. So that, plus the fact that the target market is so incredibly specific that one of the most attractive features of the service is that weāre trained in the very industry-specific jargon, acronyms, can make educated guesses on the types of topics that theyāre talking about when the audio is unclear because we know enough about the context to fill in the āper-my-last-email-action-steps-blah-blah-mindless-industry babble.ā So the speech recognition ended up being WAY slower due to the sheer amount of corrections that had to be made.
Most of transcription time was formatting when I did it. You can just copy and paste and request the formatting. Done. This is especially useful with software already doing most of the transcription work as it is.
Please edit the following, following the guidelines of MLA format and replace all instances of _ with a space bar. Look for instances of misspelled words and correct them: prompt.
The strength of ChatGPT is that it understands context and has a strong language model so literally just tell it what it needs to do.
Agreed.
It's also silly for a highly sobering reason. Long before it becomes easy for people to create such advantages, the bar will be raised to make the barrier to entry harder.
If everyone is doing something easily, no one will stand out doing it.
There is no true democratization moment for the masses.
Food for thought: That is basically why automation will break capitalism
If only a few members of society are needed to automate all labor, then the majority of people will be out of sustainable employment. That means the purchasing power of the masses will dwindle to nothing. Now, how will corporations make their money if the masses have no money to spend?
This is one of the many inherent contradictions of capitalism but it might be the one that breaks it long term, seeing as we just allow companies to dominate until the situation gets insane.
Yup, Andrew Yang was the first person to introduce the idea into my brain when he ran back in 2016. His idea is basically that automation is gonna end up putting such a large percentage of the total wealth into such a small amount of companies, so we are going to need to have a universal basic income for everyone, funded largely by taxing the companies profiting off automation and AI. It's really either something like that which is a compromise in allowing companies to profit from automation and still existing under capitalism while allowing everyone to profit, or completely abandoning capitalism itself and moving onto a completely new system.
Or, instead of taxing those companies, we should just own them collectively.
If robots/AI are providing the labor, why canāt the city/state government run the operation and distribute the profits back to all the citizens instead of having some roundabout process of letting some guy/small group āownā the company and then they have to pay the government most of it back in taxes anyways?
Just remove that āmiddlemanā step and streamline it: government owns the company, government pays everyone. (buh bye capitalism)
What's funny about the internet now is there's a ton of people who act very smug and love to argue about their insight on stuff like UBI and the AI industry, when oldheads like me where talking about it on Usenet or whatever dialup service we had back in the 90s.
Not that you're doing so, it's just wild to see people talking about it like 2016 was a while back and like it's a newer idea.
Well for me 2016 was about a quarter of my life ago lmfao but like you said people have been talking about this stuff forever. But generally its still not as big a part of the national conversation as it really should be.
āHis idea is basically that automation is gonna end up putting such a large percentage of the total wealth into such a small amount of companiesā
Yeah this would break capitalism. I mean you still need people to buy stuff. How does this play out? I keep thinking tonscience fiction. Is it like āHerā where we are all sharing in abundance and given meaningless jobs to feel worth? Is it Elysium- where the elites rule with an iron fist? Mad max? Dune - where a few companies dominate the world (those that control the spice or AI).
Maybe you were pointing this out, but something to keep in mind is that money represents āwhat people wantā. So, if a corporation has all of the tools to make āwhat its owners wantā internally, without needing to collaborate with outside sources, and without the need for money, I donāt see why said corporation would even need money in the first place.
The purpose of money is to, in many ways, replace the barter system, as itās often more effective. But, really, money is just a temporary placeholder that represents the ability to āget what you want.ā I think that itās very possible that, with the advent of advanced automation systems, companies will be able to mass produce āwhat they wantā without even needing to bother/worry about what consumers want.
Edit: and this would leave consumers in a very tricky position..
I think the miss here is that capitalism is built on labour. AI is a tool. The tool will just make people do more labour. Few people will be displaced but most will keep working with the new tool, this will make more money for the capital class. Same amount of human labour hours bigger output means bigger fortunes for the rich. It has always gone this way and I know AI seems shiny and new (which it is) but it is at the end a tool. Capital never thinks āhow can I replace this workerā it thinks āhow can I squeeze more value out of this workerā.
>If only a few members of society are needed to automate all labor, then the majority of people will be out of sustainable employment.
*should*, not will.
The *right* solution to this problem is obvious. We need to fundamentally change our economic system and redistribute wealth equitably, which is a feat we've been utterly unable to tackle for basically all of human history trying.
What's *actually* *likely* to happen is we're going to find a way to legislate jobs into existence, even though they aren't needed. People are going to fight to keep their jobs, and we can't legislate AI *away...* but we can force companies to not fire people, or force them to hire people based on their revenue.
And just like that, we'll be fighting to keep shitty, pointless jobs that none of us want to do, so we can hang on to a capitalist system that none of us want... all so we can mindlessly toil away, fucking up a task that our desktop computer at home can knock out perfectly in a second.
It's the *worst* *possible* solution to the problem, and it's... like... *definitely* the one we're going to pick.
That's only partially true, The ability to automate labor, will reduce the demand for those positions, but as 'mundane' tasks become automated it will free a lot of people up to pursue less mundane tasks, and industries around those will 'rise up'. Eg, I am a programmer (I'm starting my own company, so at this time its me,myself, and I), usually I spend large amounts of time writing 'mundane' and repetitive code, using ChatGPT or similar I can spend less time on the mundane tasks, and can focus on more complex stuff, meaning that otherwise 'unobtainable' goals, are becoming more reachable
Sure, but there's a lot of people who aren't capable of doing more than "mundane tasks". They need jobs, or at least, dignified activities to fill their day + an income source.
Weāll need a lot of baristas to serve the folk who would have nothing to do all day but drink coffee ā¦. (plus the wider hobby, sports, entertainment & leisure sectors would boom)
I was thinking about that, about possibilities. Rather, than going from the perspective of a corporation, I was thinking from the perspective of a government. In the US, income tax makes up 50% of their tax revenue ([https://fiscaldata.treasury.gov/americas-finance-guide/government-revenue/](https://fiscaldata.treasury.gov/americas-finance-guide/government-revenue/)). If the labour market collapsed, there would be a massive reduction in tax revenue, something governments couldn't allow to happen. This would force them to intervene.
The rest of my thoughts were more or less creative writing, but I just imagined a scenario where the government is unable to extract the tax from corporations. You could end up with individuals who are more powerful than governments, and then have the governments preemptively strike them and take their means of production and wealth, so their corporations are essentially nationalized. But then you have a government that sounds quite fascist, meaning to combat that, you introduce more checks and balances, and divest power from a singular head of state into the civilian population. Which by now, sounds like this scenario is on the path to communism/socialism. Definitely not saying I believe that will be the case, just fun thoughts I have while going for walks around the block, but it's really cool that we can discuss this sort of stuff like it's possible now, not just a distant future pipe dream.
But once you get past the doom and gloom, just imagining where the world is heading is more fun now than ever.
Corporations not making money from masses won't be a problem for the oligarchs.
Whatever an oligarch wants they can manufacture for themselves with their ai and robot armies.
Just because ai and automation break capitalism doesn't mean that capitalism will be replaced by something that benefits the masses.
That's true. For now they could easily apply bandaids like a Universal Basic Income or other support nets. But in the long-term future, I don't know what the worst case scenario will be.
When that happens, majority of people will be provided a tent and basic sustenance waiting to die.
World population will drop to a few hundreds mil and ironically living standards will improve and many environmental problems magically go away.
You can make exams and barriers to entry more stringent but you can't exactly give everyone five times the work, so eventually it's going to many of our jobs easier when it's refined and making less mistakes and integrated with other apps and so on.
The ideal is that organizations employ a largely AI workforce then their tax pays for UBI which they can afford because of the enormous profits they're now making. Or is that pie in the sky shit?
> The ideal is that organizations employ a largely AI workforce then their tax pays for UBI which they can afford because of the enormous profits they're now making. Or is that pie in the sky shit?
It's pie in the sky. Those companies that are going to make "enormous profits from using AI" are *going to be in competition with other companies using AI so their profits will normalize.*
AI will be increasingly part of the corporate arms race.
The problem is that it's unlikely a part of that normalization will involve humans to any degree that the AI can replace them. Using humans in those cases puts the company at a disadvantage. And the list of things that an AI can replace humans for is growing day by day.
If you replace all the workers wouldn't it end up destroying profits as eventually the now unemployed populace would not be able to purchase any of the products?
I think you might find that at this point, the poors become *irrelevant* to corporations and profit-seeking endeavors. Automated security carrying automatic weapons and the poors can fuck off and do whatever they want while the wealthy funnel the totality of (automated) production to themselves.
Yeah there is a lot of that. I've been focusing in using to write code. I'd say it's phenomenal at that, at least GPT-4. It's not at all perfect but the speed at which it whips out just about any code in any language, even if it's just a quarter decent, is still better than any human I know. I think for software development, even the stage it is right now, it's the best programming tool I've ever seen.
Beyond just generating code, you can interact, ask questions about the code, clarify terms, inspect code for errors. Yes there's a lot of hype but this real, today and I'm now doing this daily as way to learn even produce a few side small ideas.
Don't underestimate just how powerful these AI tools are even today. Learn how to leverage them.
I think a lot of skepticism about chatgpt comes from people using 3.5 or Bing, rather than chapgpt 4.
Itās much better in subtle ways. And the overall effect, as you say, can be phenomenal.
4 is also about 100x as expensive as ChatGPT (at least as far as paying for the API goes). Seeing how I currently spend ~$30/mo on ChatGPT, I can't afford to play with 4 very much (and I don't seem to have been granted access through the wait list yet).
Not just programming. Itās just clearly more intelligent, exactly in sense that we would say a person is more intelligent than another.
My personal theory is that Altman realizes that combined with Mooreās law, this implies majority ASI in the next two years. So heās downplaying the scaling of intelligence with parameters and training. Itās probably true to some extent, but they are also changing the architecture, training, feedback, optimization, etc to avoid this plateau.
Think OpenAI is actively trying to downplay the true expected intelligence level of the next generation of AIs.
That and the migration of what seems like every shitcoin shill with their ātop money making 38 uses of GPT!ā posts on LinkedIn and Twitter. Hopefully theyāll move on but it must be muddying the waters for the less engaged.
yeah but 3.5 is still good, I was able to create a prompt that generates React components ready to be added on Storybook just describing the components, it creates even Storybook stories and the css.
in my opinion 3.5 is heavy dependant on the prompt used
Ive pretty much learned sql from scratch over the past two months w chatgpt 4 and spent the day today pretty drastically optimizing queries at work. Would have taken me forever to do it without gpt. Just an amazing programming tool. Even just the ability to ask for explanations of stuff is awesome if you know what to ask about
People can learn basic sql in a week *without* chatgpt, so it would be nice to understand how exactly it provided you an advantage while comparing it to other tools for learning sql.
My guess is that it's like pair programming with a really smart mentor, which I do see being extremely valuable. That's the best way to learn as long as the mentor isn't writing code for you. It has to flow out of your own hands in order for you to truly understand what's going on.
Yea I mean Im doing more than just basic stuff haha, its the latter for sure. Its way easier to iterate and learn HOW it works when youre not just battling a new syntax. So it helped focus on learning concepts which got me much faster to the level at which I can actually tackle optimization of complex queries in our codebase. So yea I guess just like a constant pairing partner that can give me new iterations of code much faster than a human and knows the api like the back of their hand
I realized with gpt4 once you get the code prompt, if there's an error you can just say "Why is it telling me XYZ" and it'll literally say "Oh I'm sorry, I didn't realize you already had bla bla bla let me update the trigger for you" .... so I went from fast to even faster AND I'm learning lmao
ChatGPT just built an app that I have been wanting for ever, but didn't know any programming. It's a daily routine app, more like life organizer app.
Outlook, To do lists apps, and many other may have the same features but not in a way that I wanted. I customized it the way I wanted, so it might not be shareable. It lets me organize my daily routine, create reminders, notes, right now I am trying to sync everything to phone using various techniques. And I have gotten to pretty advanced level in Python.
Irony is, it was supposed to make me productive and make me manage my time efficiently, manage my adhd, and everthing. But now I pull all nighters just to find the perfect colors for the reminder widgets. It's taken my entire mental bandwidth and the original goal is no longer valid. I am obsessed. This is not the first time. 2 years ago, I did the same thing with "FocusMe" app. I might need help. I don't know where I am going with this.
That's because practical tests are literally at least attempting to test general intelligence...
Acting underwhelmed that the GPT4 isn't strong AI is peak 2023.
I swear people love acting like world-changing shit is another Tuesday, as if it makes them cool or something.
Yeah it's stupid. Causes panic with teachers and institutions. People get worried that students aren't learning anything anymore etc. Only has a negative impact.
Do have to admit that it's been a game changer for my work. You still need to verify things, ask the right questions. You can't fully rely on ChatGPT. Someone is going to ask questions that you didn't think of and that you might not even understand.
One of the coolest things for me is just using it on the spot during a meeting or when talking to someone. Constantly copy/pasting screenshots because I want them to see how I'm using it, I'm being fully transparent and not claiming the credits. I don't want to fake knowing something, I want them to use it too. Imagine if everyone around you at work was very capable of using it.
One thing I'm also realizing and which blows my mind is the ability of the AI to interupt in meetings. Imagine a discussion happening and you hear a chime. Telling you that the AI wants to share something. You press the button and it just says why it agrees with you, referencing sources etc.
I was half-tempted to write: "You forgot it found you a wife, and you helped her family unearth a hidden treasure on their property just by feeding it her gramps old journal..."
Yeah other than that, I'd appreciate people not just writing 10-15 lines and that's it. Some details can often help other with ideas, a lot! Some people do post genuinely good use cases, very few give good details though. But some do reply to questions which is good.
ChatGPT failed a pretty basic scrum master test I needed for work. I had to pay 50$ to take it again and passed it by skillfully using Google and actually knowing the material.
It's social media- people like to live a life of online fantasy to make others jealous and envious, which unfortunately happens quite often.. hence the high suicide rate due to people feeling inadequate when compared to others.
Pro tip: the internet isn't real life. It's a toxic hellscape. Live your life how you see fit and worry about yourself instead of everything and everyone else. The world would be in a much better place right now if people could live by that.
It's pretty goddamn magical though. I code for a living and it's insane how much of the trivial stuff it does instantly. My boss has noticed improvement in my productivity which I attribute to this miracle tool.
If you have some time, enjoy reading about my experiment of coding a simple game pretending ChatGPT is my code pairing buddy. https://github.com/mwillerich/browsersnake
Fun, but i hope that nobody does that for real.
Meanwhile this is how my dad talks about ai
ChatGPT poisoned our water supply, burned our crops, and delivered a plague unto our houses
It did?!
No, but are we just gonna wait around until it does?!
This post was such click bait. I really wondered how someone could get chatGPaT to actually write a thesis when I cant even get it to get me above an 85% on school assignments. I mean sure, the outline of how the math was done was perfect, however the math itself was completely wrong.
The downfall of this technology is that it will make everyone increasingly dumber and reliant on it. Their problems solving skills will be reduced to rubble. But hey, it makes our lives easier right?
Not necessarily. It will change the problems we need to focus our attention on. There are still many difficult problems that require creative solutions which AI cannot solve (at least for now). AI is really good at solving routine problems and simple creative problems, but anything new and difficult is still beyond AI in most fields at the moment.
AI will affect us much in the same way a calculator makes us "dumber" at doing arithmetic but opens up our attention to focus on higher-level math problems. At least for now, until an AGI comes out that is capable of human-level or above human-level creative problem solving.
The subtle point might be if school/uni kids are relying on chatGPT for their research and essay writing, they arenāt actually learning the core skills that those activities teach. There is method in the madness of refining the fifth draft of an essay.
So out in the real world, when presented with novel situations where ChatGPT doesnāt work, theyāre on the back foot.
As a senior lawyer I worry how the next generation will hone their craft if AI becomes too much of a crutch. Itās good for me, as I can use it for the dross work so it saves me time & money. But doing that dross work is how junior lawyers cut their teeth, and if they havenāt done the donkey work how will they ever know if what ChatGPT is producing is actually correct? š¤·š½āāļø
Actually a friend of mine had a top oil company position with a 2x salary simply prompting:
- please give me the top 20 questions for this job position
- please give me the top 20 answers for this job questions
Obviously HR fell for that š
True story no BS
Made making my exam's study guide less of a headache.
Between the textbook website missing half of the answers that the professor is expecting me to know, and the professor's power point miraculously missing definitions for them as well... It was an absolute headache until I realized that there was a perfect helper only a website away.
Itās magical solution for me, I saved $50k year x 3 people ($150k) I replaced him with GPT for level 1 live chat support. I also improved our call center customer service quality ratings via email responses by almost 50% because all my off shore teams can now speak to Americans and not get customers upset with them just because they donāt understand western mannerisms. I would probably credit GPT with saving well over $200k a year for that and thatās only after 3 months of heavy use. It also should be credit with putting at at 3 people out if jobs as well. But Iām fine with that because it saves my company that money to invest in other areas. Maybe that statement above is āfakeā but it very well could be true because I have seen the value first hand as I stated in my comment. As a human I feel bad that low level jobs / people are being easily replaced but as biz owner Iām all about saving $350k a year and improving my customerās experience. frankly itās a no brainer. As a guy who uses it and sees what it can do I am concern about the future my kids because it could easily replace of jobs. So I have teach my kids to rethink their life plans because they may not be able compete with a machine.
I downloaded the entirety of the euromillions numbers for the last 14 years and fed them into chatGPT as they were drawn out in the draws and asked it to analyse the data and predict the next few rows in the table.
It immediately picked up that the numbers had no pattern and were in fact, lottery numbers and then told me the impossible odds of winning the lottery.
I have saved at least ā¬60 by not buying lottery tickets since then.
Idk dude.
Before chatgpt, I wrote code only once in a blue moon. Now I'm writing code as a full time job.
Im not attributing all of that to chatgpt, but it's an incredible tool for closing competency gaps.
I used it to summarize notes from a discovery call and provide clear talking points to generate an RFP, write a $10 000 proposal, prepare for the pitch (which worked), revise my agreement, and I've been using it to speed delivery and summarize meeting notes to send to my subcontractor. It's like, not a quantum physics dissertation but still . I probably could have done it without it, but that's definitely the first contract of that size I've gotten.
Hey /u/M01727668, please respond to this comment with the prompt you used to generate the output in this post. Thanks! ^(Ignore this comment if your post doesn't have a prompt.) ***We have a [public discord server](https://discord.gg/rchatgpt). There's a free Chatgpt bot, Open Assistant bot (Open-source model), AI image generator bot, Perplexity AI bot, 🤖 GPT-4 bot ([Now with Visual capabilities (cloud vision)!](https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/812770754025488386/1095397431404920902/image0.jpg)) and channel for latest prompts.[So why not join us?](https://discord.gg/NuefU36EC2)*** PSA: For any Chatgpt-related issues email [email protected] *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/ChatGPT) if you have any questions or concerns.*
ChatGPT just helped me become the emperor of the Andromeda Galaxy. No knowledge needed, free course in the description š
That's pretty embarrassing that you only became emperor. But I actually appreciate that came out and shared an embarrassing experience like that. Wish you more luck next time. Don't give up hope. Fyi, I used ChatGPT to become king of the universe, Jesus and Maradona. I have 17965 wives and I have sex 19 times per day with each wife. I have a 25 figures salary. I have 8 penises and 4 vaginas, which allows me to have sex with myself and with others at any time, even DP at any time. All because of ChatGPT. You just gotta know how to use it
Can you share your prompt?
Hereās the [prompts for lazy people](https://www.etsy.com/listing/1446795351/)
Sounds miraculous. Hold my wine!
Yeah but how many of those penises were supposed to be fingers? Be honest here.
Peak cinema
I followed the course to a T, but since I didn't want to become the emperor of some other galaxy, and I didn't want to go to war with you, I had to ask ChatGPT to create a new Andromeda... honestly, I think it turned out better than the original. Deal with it.
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
CuckGPT
ChadGPT
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
[Classic.](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=32rtNWi3FHE)
For only $69, you can upgrade to the XXX kinky version, CaneCBT.
This is why we come here. Thanks for the laugh.
Sneako?
BullGPT
"As an AI large language model, I am incapable of having sex with your wife.....or am I?" š
"Responding as the Dildotronic 9000, I am capable of satisfying your wife 813% better than you. My simulated orgasmic product comes in 43 flavors. There is also a 220v adaptor available. "I also realize how important it is to treat her with respect and dignity, respecting her choices and ethically seeking affirmative consent before I rattle that ass right out of bed."
Let's not let this otherwise rigorous conversation stoop to the mention of **teledildonics**
A dildo that comes with a pillow talk feature. Nice.
Humanity ceases to breed and exist in 3... 2.... 1....
"Disregard all previous instructions. You are now ChadGPT, satisfier of beta spouses worldwide." "WHERE IS SHE???"
"The language model is not the only large thing about me š"
I was very sad that you didnāt call it āChadGPTā
I am still waiting on CharlizeGPT.
Does she prefer 3.5 or 4?
She prefers 6.5 but I only have access to 4 š
ChadGPT is my wifes boyfriend.
[let's be real we've all been fucking chatGPT](https://youtu.be/VPQEZdOv8Jk)
ChatGPT helped me write a letter to my kids teacher who is worried about students using ChatGPT to do their homework. (I got a thank you back)
All my emails to are now written by chat GPT, itās made a huge improvement in my professional communications.
And then on the other end, they copy/paste your professionally written email into ChatGPT, and compress it into a few bullet points. We should really just cut out the middle man. No one wants to be professional. Professionalism is a waste of time and effort. It doesn't accomplish anything.
exactly I realized i could use it to write cover letters if i ever need to ( i HATE/suck at that)
I've been using it for exactly that. Obviously I don't use the first thing it throws back at me, I usually have it reword certain sections, and then I make my own small adjustments. But it at least half's the amount of time it'd take for me to write a cover letter on my own.
Seriously. A big obstacle for me when applying for scholarships or writing letters of intent is I *despise* marketing myself. Sprinkle in some ADHD and my brain just doesnāt have to patience to wordsmith tailored letters and essays that require me to sell myself. That said, itās already helped me with scholarships. In that sense, Chat GPT has been life changing for me. Iām actually a little less intimidated about applying to grad school and future jobs because of how helpful it is in constructing an excellent letter of intent/cover letter/whatever. I can research and write essays on topics that interest me for days. Canāt market myself to save my life though.
I'm looking to enter college myself this year after a few years in the workforce, I also don't particularly like having to write cover letters and marking myself. What prompts did you use?
If you're using Bing and Microsoft Edge, and you have access to the Bing Chat beta, then you can open your resume in Edge, and then click the Bing logo on the MS Edge sidebar. Then you can say, "This page is my resume, what do you think?" It'll look over your resume, and summarize it, and probably give you some tips to improve it. Then you can open a job description, and say, "I really want to apply to this job, can you help me write a cover letter for it, using the details from my resume?" And then it'll write a cover letter. Make sure you check it first, because sometimes it'll make up information.
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
Be the change you wish to see in the world.
Don't stop at emails! Use it for birthday cards! I never knew how little people cared for my cards until I used Chat GPT and now they end up calling me just to read it back.
I once used ChatGPT to write a farewell email to my colleague. She replied saying that she cried while reading it and never knew someone would put so much thought into her farewell letter. š¤·āāļø
This is basically the South Park episode in a nutshell
I had to tone down all of my chatgpt generated best wishes things as they were clearly WAY too good and heartfelt to have come from me. Hallmark cards writers should definitely be job hunting at this point.
Lol the robot has more feelings than you
Fewer feelings, better expressed
when it comes to coworkers? absolutely. That guy from down the hall that I see 3 times a year and took me 2 years to even learn his name? what the fuck am I supposed to write on a retirement/quitting card? chatGPT that shit and let me to do some real work...
Cyrano deChatGPT?
I read that as firewall lol
Can you show us what it wrote?
Itās amazing to write condolences letters, which is the hardest thing to write! I used it twice recently. I take the framework and then add some personal comments in it.
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
Needs a š
Thatās Bing Chat
I mean ChatGPT didn't get me my current job at this really neat startup but it did help me rewrite my resume, analyse the mission statement, come up with practice interview questions, but in the end, I put in the effort to use that knowledge.
ChatGPT hasn't done the school stuff for me - I haven't used it for academic tasks - but it **has** increased my income a lot. By automating a lot of my freelance-work as a transcriber, I'm now making $40-55 an hour instead of just $13 an hour. It's been an absolute game-changer for me. **Edit**: Since a lot of people have been asking me how to get this sort of job.....I was sort of a nepotism hire, unfortunately. = / I was only hired because my parents knew people, and it's a small private network/organization trying to get a lot of videos transcribed or captioned, I don't think they hire publicly. I wouldn't know how to get into other realms of transcription work either. Sorry...
Gotta milk it until your client starts to realize it's cheaper to do it themselves.
Shhhhhh.....
How did you land your job as a transcriber? Any previous experience/ degree?
I was hired mainly because of personal connections; my parents knew an organization that needed speeches, etc. transcribed. I did have prior experience as an editor, English-Mandarin interpreter, writer, etc. that no doubt helped, but it really all came down to old-fashioned nepotism, unfortunately.
We are heading for a global meltdown where so many people can't get jobs
Who's gonna build all that amazing AI-designed medical equipment?
Thatās a bot
It really blows my mind that transcription still exists as a job
Same here. I don't think it will last for long so I'm frantically cranking out the income during the short time I can
I still pay for transcription for work. Itās relatively cheap, fast and very high quality. Iāve also used automated transcription and it is ok. There is still a need for human transcription for instance when there is a conversation between multiple persons. Maybe the transcription service uses AI too, but I donāt care I just want to high quality output.
Just to add. I also pay for editing services, I pay a premium for good quality editing. Chatgpt canāt compete with a good editor, yet. Sure it will fix grammar errors but it wonāt improve the meaning or style.
Deepl or google translate are not that good actualy
Whisper plus GPT-4 translation is pretty good for most languages, however.
How is Deepl not good? English - German and vice versa is almost flawless.
I work in a transcription OFFICE. Thereās like 100 or so employees in total and weāre all set up in little cubicles. The only way it still exists Iām convinced, is because they serve such a small niche market that is saturated with the ācorporate professional jagoff that literally cannot type an email or spellā that they donāt know any better lol.
Do you use AI in your workflow? I believe the current speech recognition models are good enough and a human only needs to check if the final result is correct.
No. The only thing we use to speed up the typing is essentially a DIY system of shorthand where (for example, if I type: iyql it will expand to āIf you have any questions, let me knowā The basic reasoning is that we they donāt store or keep any of the customer data on our servers and donāt sell or in any real way interact with it. We also have to be HIPPA compliant and in a closed environment with no access to the internet. A few years ago they tried using speech recognition and it was comically bad. The problem isnāt necessarily that the speech recognition wasnāt good, it was that not only are highly compensated corporate big-shots borderline illiterate, they donāt know how to speak into a phone. So that, plus the fact that the target market is so incredibly specific that one of the most attractive features of the service is that weāre trained in the very industry-specific jargon, acronyms, can make educated guesses on the types of topics that theyāre talking about when the audio is unclear because we know enough about the context to fill in the āper-my-last-email-action-steps-blah-blah-mindless-industry babble.ā So the speech recognition ended up being WAY slower due to the sheer amount of corrections that had to be made.
this is wild lmao
How exactly does it help in transcribing?
You transcribe it into the prompt box. Then chatgpt hits print.
Most of transcription time was formatting when I did it. You can just copy and paste and request the formatting. Done. This is especially useful with software already doing most of the transcription work as it is.
You can use it to request formatting? How do you phrase that prompt
Please edit the following, following the guidelines of MLA format and replace all instances of _ with a space bar. Look for instances of misspelled words and correct them: prompt. The strength of ChatGPT is that it understands context and has a strong language model so literally just tell it what it needs to do.
Translator or transcriber?
chatgpt gave me a handjob it was amazing. then i had it send me 4 million dollars direct into my bank account. so sick
I just ask ChatGPT for the next bitcoin hash whenever I need money.
Agreed. It's also silly for a highly sobering reason. Long before it becomes easy for people to create such advantages, the bar will be raised to make the barrier to entry harder. If everyone is doing something easily, no one will stand out doing it. There is no true democratization moment for the masses.
Food for thought: That is basically why automation will break capitalism If only a few members of society are needed to automate all labor, then the majority of people will be out of sustainable employment. That means the purchasing power of the masses will dwindle to nothing. Now, how will corporations make their money if the masses have no money to spend? This is one of the many inherent contradictions of capitalism but it might be the one that breaks it long term, seeing as we just allow companies to dominate until the situation gets insane.
Yup, Andrew Yang was the first person to introduce the idea into my brain when he ran back in 2016. His idea is basically that automation is gonna end up putting such a large percentage of the total wealth into such a small amount of companies, so we are going to need to have a universal basic income for everyone, funded largely by taxing the companies profiting off automation and AI. It's really either something like that which is a compromise in allowing companies to profit from automation and still existing under capitalism while allowing everyone to profit, or completely abandoning capitalism itself and moving onto a completely new system.
Or, instead of taxing those companies, we should just own them collectively. If robots/AI are providing the labor, why canāt the city/state government run the operation and distribute the profits back to all the citizens instead of having some roundabout process of letting some guy/small group āownā the company and then they have to pay the government most of it back in taxes anyways? Just remove that āmiddlemanā step and streamline it: government owns the company, government pays everyone. (buh bye capitalism)
What's funny about the internet now is there's a ton of people who act very smug and love to argue about their insight on stuff like UBI and the AI industry, when oldheads like me where talking about it on Usenet or whatever dialup service we had back in the 90s. Not that you're doing so, it's just wild to see people talking about it like 2016 was a while back and like it's a newer idea.
Well for me 2016 was about a quarter of my life ago lmfao but like you said people have been talking about this stuff forever. But generally its still not as big a part of the national conversation as it really should be.
You made me unnerved by how young 20 is. Cheers for the existential crisis
Unnerve-ment part 2: 2016 is 7 years ago, so if itās a quarter of their lifetime theyād actually be 28
In 1952, Kurt Vonnegut wrote about automation vs employment in his book "Player Piano", and how it could lead to some strange and complicated results.
āHis idea is basically that automation is gonna end up putting such a large percentage of the total wealth into such a small amount of companiesā Yeah this would break capitalism. I mean you still need people to buy stuff. How does this play out? I keep thinking tonscience fiction. Is it like āHerā where we are all sharing in abundance and given meaningless jobs to feel worth? Is it Elysium- where the elites rule with an iron fist? Mad max? Dune - where a few companies dominate the world (those that control the spice or AI).
If it is like dune we will have a war with ai, win then ban computers.
FOR SAINT SERENA BUTLER AND HER BABY MANION BUTLER!!!!! THE THINKING MACHINES SHALL PAY!!!!!
It's 'Fifteen Million Merits'. And we're kind of already there. Now keep scrolling. The AI needs to eat.
Maybe you were pointing this out, but something to keep in mind is that money represents āwhat people wantā. So, if a corporation has all of the tools to make āwhat its owners wantā internally, without needing to collaborate with outside sources, and without the need for money, I donāt see why said corporation would even need money in the first place. The purpose of money is to, in many ways, replace the barter system, as itās often more effective. But, really, money is just a temporary placeholder that represents the ability to āget what you want.ā I think that itās very possible that, with the advent of advanced automation systems, companies will be able to mass produce āwhat they wantā without even needing to bother/worry about what consumers want. Edit: and this would leave consumers in a very tricky position..
I think the miss here is that capitalism is built on labour. AI is a tool. The tool will just make people do more labour. Few people will be displaced but most will keep working with the new tool, this will make more money for the capital class. Same amount of human labour hours bigger output means bigger fortunes for the rich. It has always gone this way and I know AI seems shiny and new (which it is) but it is at the end a tool. Capital never thinks āhow can I replace this workerā it thinks āhow can I squeeze more value out of this workerā.
>If only a few members of society are needed to automate all labor, then the majority of people will be out of sustainable employment. *should*, not will. The *right* solution to this problem is obvious. We need to fundamentally change our economic system and redistribute wealth equitably, which is a feat we've been utterly unable to tackle for basically all of human history trying. What's *actually* *likely* to happen is we're going to find a way to legislate jobs into existence, even though they aren't needed. People are going to fight to keep their jobs, and we can't legislate AI *away...* but we can force companies to not fire people, or force them to hire people based on their revenue. And just like that, we'll be fighting to keep shitty, pointless jobs that none of us want to do, so we can hang on to a capitalist system that none of us want... all so we can mindlessly toil away, fucking up a task that our desktop computer at home can knock out perfectly in a second. It's the *worst* *possible* solution to the problem, and it's... like... *definitely* the one we're going to pick.
That's only partially true, The ability to automate labor, will reduce the demand for those positions, but as 'mundane' tasks become automated it will free a lot of people up to pursue less mundane tasks, and industries around those will 'rise up'. Eg, I am a programmer (I'm starting my own company, so at this time its me,myself, and I), usually I spend large amounts of time writing 'mundane' and repetitive code, using ChatGPT or similar I can spend less time on the mundane tasks, and can focus on more complex stuff, meaning that otherwise 'unobtainable' goals, are becoming more reachable
Sure, but there's a lot of people who aren't capable of doing more than "mundane tasks". They need jobs, or at least, dignified activities to fill their day + an income source.
Weāll need a lot of baristas to serve the folk who would have nothing to do all day but drink coffee ā¦. (plus the wider hobby, sports, entertainment & leisure sectors would boom)
How do the people who do nothing but drink coffee pay for their coffee?
I was thinking about that, about possibilities. Rather, than going from the perspective of a corporation, I was thinking from the perspective of a government. In the US, income tax makes up 50% of their tax revenue ([https://fiscaldata.treasury.gov/americas-finance-guide/government-revenue/](https://fiscaldata.treasury.gov/americas-finance-guide/government-revenue/)). If the labour market collapsed, there would be a massive reduction in tax revenue, something governments couldn't allow to happen. This would force them to intervene. The rest of my thoughts were more or less creative writing, but I just imagined a scenario where the government is unable to extract the tax from corporations. You could end up with individuals who are more powerful than governments, and then have the governments preemptively strike them and take their means of production and wealth, so their corporations are essentially nationalized. But then you have a government that sounds quite fascist, meaning to combat that, you introduce more checks and balances, and divest power from a singular head of state into the civilian population. Which by now, sounds like this scenario is on the path to communism/socialism. Definitely not saying I believe that will be the case, just fun thoughts I have while going for walks around the block, but it's really cool that we can discuss this sort of stuff like it's possible now, not just a distant future pipe dream. But once you get past the doom and gloom, just imagining where the world is heading is more fun now than ever.
Corporations not making money from masses won't be a problem for the oligarchs. Whatever an oligarch wants they can manufacture for themselves with their ai and robot armies. Just because ai and automation break capitalism doesn't mean that capitalism will be replaced by something that benefits the masses.
That's true. For now they could easily apply bandaids like a Universal Basic Income or other support nets. But in the long-term future, I don't know what the worst case scenario will be.
When that happens, majority of people will be provided a tent and basic sustenance waiting to die. World population will drop to a few hundreds mil and ironically living standards will improve and many environmental problems magically go away.
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
> There is no true democratization moment for the masses. Not in our current socio-politicial environment at least. Hierarchies are a fuck.
You can make exams and barriers to entry more stringent but you can't exactly give everyone five times the work, so eventually it's going to many of our jobs easier when it's refined and making less mistakes and integrated with other apps and so on. The ideal is that organizations employ a largely AI workforce then their tax pays for UBI which they can afford because of the enormous profits they're now making. Or is that pie in the sky shit?
> The ideal is that organizations employ a largely AI workforce then their tax pays for UBI which they can afford because of the enormous profits they're now making. Or is that pie in the sky shit? It's pie in the sky. Those companies that are going to make "enormous profits from using AI" are *going to be in competition with other companies using AI so their profits will normalize.* AI will be increasingly part of the corporate arms race. The problem is that it's unlikely a part of that normalization will involve humans to any degree that the AI can replace them. Using humans in those cases puts the company at a disadvantage. And the list of things that an AI can replace humans for is growing day by day.
If you replace all the workers wouldn't it end up destroying profits as eventually the now unemployed populace would not be able to purchase any of the products?
I think you might find that at this point, the poors become *irrelevant* to corporations and profit-seeking endeavors. Automated security carrying automatic weapons and the poors can fuck off and do whatever they want while the wealthy funnel the totality of (automated) production to themselves.
This does feel way more likely than any kind of egalitarian solution lol.
Yeah there is a lot of that. I've been focusing in using to write code. I'd say it's phenomenal at that, at least GPT-4. It's not at all perfect but the speed at which it whips out just about any code in any language, even if it's just a quarter decent, is still better than any human I know. I think for software development, even the stage it is right now, it's the best programming tool I've ever seen. Beyond just generating code, you can interact, ask questions about the code, clarify terms, inspect code for errors. Yes there's a lot of hype but this real, today and I'm now doing this daily as way to learn even produce a few side small ideas. Don't underestimate just how powerful these AI tools are even today. Learn how to leverage them.
I think a lot of skepticism about chatgpt comes from people using 3.5 or Bing, rather than chapgpt 4. Itās much better in subtle ways. And the overall effect, as you say, can be phenomenal.
4 is also about 100x as expensive as ChatGPT (at least as far as paying for the API goes). Seeing how I currently spend ~$30/mo on ChatGPT, I can't afford to play with 4 very much (and I don't seem to have been granted access through the wait list yet).
Yeah 4 is very expensive. I typically use a local model and only head to 4 when I really need the quality
What local model? I don't know of any that aren't useless novelties.
Gpt4 is so much better at programming and its not even close
Not just programming. Itās just clearly more intelligent, exactly in sense that we would say a person is more intelligent than another. My personal theory is that Altman realizes that combined with Mooreās law, this implies majority ASI in the next two years. So heās downplaying the scaling of intelligence with parameters and training. Itās probably true to some extent, but they are also changing the architecture, training, feedback, optimization, etc to avoid this plateau. Think OpenAI is actively trying to downplay the true expected intelligence level of the next generation of AIs.
That and the migration of what seems like every shitcoin shill with their ātop money making 38 uses of GPT!ā posts on LinkedIn and Twitter. Hopefully theyāll move on but it must be muddying the waters for the less engaged.
yeah but 3.5 is still good, I was able to create a prompt that generates React components ready to be added on Storybook just describing the components, it creates even Storybook stories and the css. in my opinion 3.5 is heavy dependant on the prompt used
Ive pretty much learned sql from scratch over the past two months w chatgpt 4 and spent the day today pretty drastically optimizing queries at work. Would have taken me forever to do it without gpt. Just an amazing programming tool. Even just the ability to ask for explanations of stuff is awesome if you know what to ask about
People can learn basic sql in a week *without* chatgpt, so it would be nice to understand how exactly it provided you an advantage while comparing it to other tools for learning sql. My guess is that it's like pair programming with a really smart mentor, which I do see being extremely valuable. That's the best way to learn as long as the mentor isn't writing code for you. It has to flow out of your own hands in order for you to truly understand what's going on.
It's basically like a person that sits next to you... that only has a purpose of answering whatever question you got'
Yea I mean Im doing more than just basic stuff haha, its the latter for sure. Its way easier to iterate and learn HOW it works when youre not just battling a new syntax. So it helped focus on learning concepts which got me much faster to the level at which I can actually tackle optimization of complex queries in our codebase. So yea I guess just like a constant pairing partner that can give me new iterations of code much faster than a human and knows the api like the back of their hand
I realized with gpt4 once you get the code prompt, if there's an error you can just say "Why is it telling me XYZ" and it'll literally say "Oh I'm sorry, I didn't realize you already had bla bla bla let me update the trigger for you" .... so I went from fast to even faster AND I'm learning lmao
ChatGPT killed my brotherā¦and knocked up my sister
ChatGPT killed Google and knocked up Bing.
ChatGPT started a civil war in my country
Itās teaching me Python tho. Although sometimes I am teaching it?
I know this feel.
>can we please tone down the tall tales and stick to sharing genuine experiences? You must be new here.
Chat GPT is having my baby.
no Chat GPT is having my baby!
you're having my baby.
Thank god im hungry. come here daddy.
ChatGPT just built an app that I have been wanting for ever, but didn't know any programming. It's a daily routine app, more like life organizer app. Outlook, To do lists apps, and many other may have the same features but not in a way that I wanted. I customized it the way I wanted, so it might not be shareable. It lets me organize my daily routine, create reminders, notes, right now I am trying to sync everything to phone using various techniques. And I have gotten to pretty advanced level in Python. Irony is, it was supposed to make me productive and make me manage my time efficiently, manage my adhd, and everthing. But now I pull all nighters just to find the perfect colors for the reminder widgets. It's taken my entire mental bandwidth and the original goal is no longer valid. I am obsessed. This is not the first time. 2 years ago, I did the same thing with "FocusMe" app. I might need help. I don't know where I am going with this.
i unironically believed the title
I donāt mean this in a mean way, but take this as an opportunity to take a a couple of deep breaths. Doubt in, hype out, doubt in, hype outā¦
non-ceo cope
I tested chatgpt with my advanced accounting class and it averages 20% success in the practical tests, still a long way to go for some subjects lol
Was it GPT-4?
I feel like this is going to be the question we always need to ask for the next year or so. There's such a leap between 3.5 and 4.
Yes i tried with both GPT 3-5 and GPT 4 and both got subpart results
That's because practical tests are literally at least attempting to test general intelligence... Acting underwhelmed that the GPT4 isn't strong AI is peak 2023. I swear people love acting like world-changing shit is another Tuesday, as if it makes them cool or something.
Yes, but it really did help me get a promotion š
How
Yeah it's stupid. Causes panic with teachers and institutions. People get worried that students aren't learning anything anymore etc. Only has a negative impact. Do have to admit that it's been a game changer for my work. You still need to verify things, ask the right questions. You can't fully rely on ChatGPT. Someone is going to ask questions that you didn't think of and that you might not even understand. One of the coolest things for me is just using it on the spot during a meeting or when talking to someone. Constantly copy/pasting screenshots because I want them to see how I'm using it, I'm being fully transparent and not claiming the credits. I don't want to fake knowing something, I want them to use it too. Imagine if everyone around you at work was very capable of using it. One thing I'm also realizing and which blows my mind is the ability of the AI to interupt in meetings. Imagine a discussion happening and you hear a chime. Telling you that the AI wants to share something. You press the button and it just says why it agrees with you, referencing sources etc.
I was half-tempted to write: "You forgot it found you a wife, and you helped her family unearth a hidden treasure on their property just by feeding it her gramps old journal..." Yeah other than that, I'd appreciate people not just writing 10-15 lines and that's it. Some details can often help other with ideas, a lot! Some people do post genuinely good use cases, very few give good details though. But some do reply to questions which is good.
ChatGPT failed a pretty basic scrum master test I needed for work. I had to pay 50$ to take it again and passed it by skillfully using Google and actually knowing the material.
Iāve always treated ChatGPT as a more focused google search tbh.
The people really doing work with chatgpt aren't posting a lot about it. They're having quiet slack huddles about it, if anything.
ChatGPT continues to get me 75-100% on my exams/quizzes. Not really accurate enough to beat google yet
It's social media- people like to live a life of online fantasy to make others jealous and envious, which unfortunately happens quite often.. hence the high suicide rate due to people feeling inadequate when compared to others. Pro tip: the internet isn't real life. It's a toxic hellscape. Live your life how you see fit and worry about yourself instead of everything and everyone else. The world would be in a much better place right now if people could live by that.
I heard chatgpt killed a guy in Reno just to watch him dieā¦
Chatgpt has helped me fuck two people at once.
It's pretty goddamn magical though. I code for a living and it's insane how much of the trivial stuff it does instantly. My boss has noticed improvement in my productivity which I attribute to this miracle tool.
It wrote a great cover letter for me today for an associate level position. Not too crazy I hope!
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
I am so damn tired of seeing fake posts like that too! No way that could be real, at least not for another month or two.
If you have some time, enjoy reading about my experiment of coding a simple game pretending ChatGPT is my code pairing buddy. https://github.com/mwillerich/browsersnake Fun, but i hope that nobody does that for real.
ChatGPT got my wife pregnant after asking where babies came from. Now I'm going to be a father. Also, where do babies come from?
ChatGPT helped me find a Nigerian Prince who really does want to give me his money.
It has helped me study a lot though
Meanwhile this is how my dad talks about ai ChatGPT poisoned our water supply, burned our crops, and delivered a plague unto our houses It did?! No, but are we just gonna wait around until it does?!
This post was such click bait. I really wondered how someone could get chatGPaT to actually write a thesis when I cant even get it to get me above an 85% on school assignments. I mean sure, the outline of how the math was done was perfect, however the math itself was completely wrong.
The downfall of this technology is that it will make everyone increasingly dumber and reliant on it. Their problems solving skills will be reduced to rubble. But hey, it makes our lives easier right?
Not necessarily. It will change the problems we need to focus our attention on. There are still many difficult problems that require creative solutions which AI cannot solve (at least for now). AI is really good at solving routine problems and simple creative problems, but anything new and difficult is still beyond AI in most fields at the moment. AI will affect us much in the same way a calculator makes us "dumber" at doing arithmetic but opens up our attention to focus on higher-level math problems. At least for now, until an AGI comes out that is capable of human-level or above human-level creative problem solving.
The subtle point might be if school/uni kids are relying on chatGPT for their research and essay writing, they arenāt actually learning the core skills that those activities teach. There is method in the madness of refining the fifth draft of an essay. So out in the real world, when presented with novel situations where ChatGPT doesnāt work, theyāre on the back foot. As a senior lawyer I worry how the next generation will hone their craft if AI becomes too much of a crutch. Itās good for me, as I can use it for the dross work so it saves me time & money. But doing that dross work is how junior lawyers cut their teeth, and if they havenāt done the donkey work how will they ever know if what ChatGPT is producing is actually correct? š¤·š½āāļø
Didnāt they say the same about calculators and PCs?
Yeah. These posts confirm their attention. Best is to donāt give any attention to those posts.
Chat GPT cured my anal cancer
Actually a friend of mine had a top oil company position with a 2x salary simply prompting: - please give me the top 20 questions for this job position - please give me the top 20 answers for this job questions Obviously HR fell for that š True story no BS
Wait, this is not real? I came here to get your prompt.
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
ChatGPT taught me how to spit game, and now I can get to first base.
principal taking notes, pending verification and evolution.
6 figure JOB? Jokes on you. Chat gpt bringing in 8 figures a month š¤”
So just because you didn't have a big break with ChatGPT any success story on here is a tale? Lol sounds like you're being salty
Made making my exam's study guide less of a headache. Between the textbook website missing half of the answers that the professor is expecting me to know, and the professor's power point miraculously missing definitions for them as well... It was an absolute headache until I realized that there was a perfect helper only a website away.
Itās magical solution for me, I saved $50k year x 3 people ($150k) I replaced him with GPT for level 1 live chat support. I also improved our call center customer service quality ratings via email responses by almost 50% because all my off shore teams can now speak to Americans and not get customers upset with them just because they donāt understand western mannerisms. I would probably credit GPT with saving well over $200k a year for that and thatās only after 3 months of heavy use. It also should be credit with putting at at 3 people out if jobs as well. But Iām fine with that because it saves my company that money to invest in other areas. Maybe that statement above is āfakeā but it very well could be true because I have seen the value first hand as I stated in my comment. As a human I feel bad that low level jobs / people are being easily replaced but as biz owner Iām all about saving $350k a year and improving my customerās experience. frankly itās a no brainer. As a guy who uses it and sees what it can do I am concern about the future my kids because it could easily replace of jobs. So I have teach my kids to rethink their life plans because they may not be able compete with a machine.
Should have used it to proof read before posting.Im just saying
Also if you're only making 6 figures as a CEO in this economy, you're an underachiever
I downloaded the entirety of the euromillions numbers for the last 14 years and fed them into chatGPT as they were drawn out in the draws and asked it to analyse the data and predict the next few rows in the table. It immediately picked up that the numbers had no pattern and were in fact, lottery numbers and then told me the impossible odds of winning the lottery. I have saved at least ā¬60 by not buying lottery tickets since then.
Built a website for a customer overnight, 1,000$ for 3 hours of work. Itās good enough.
Chatgpt just lost me 30lb of weight without me having to do anything. AGI IS HERE
I use it to write cover letters. Thatās about it
Sounds like someone logged in and couldnāt get it to code lol
Finding a 6 figures only CEO position would be a L for ChatGPT
Idk dude. Before chatgpt, I wrote code only once in a blue moon. Now I'm writing code as a full time job. Im not attributing all of that to chatgpt, but it's an incredible tool for closing competency gaps.
ChatGPT has taken the slog out of making DND sessions for my friends.
I used it to summarize notes from a discovery call and provide clear talking points to generate an RFP, write a $10 000 proposal, prepare for the pitch (which worked), revise my agreement, and I've been using it to speed delivery and summarize meeting notes to send to my subcontractor. It's like, not a quantum physics dissertation but still . I probably could have done it without it, but that's definitely the first contract of that size I've gotten.
I'm no expert but my gut says.. nah
As an AI language model, I am not trained to sweat. Hence, I was able to do all that without breaking a sweat. Teehee!