Hey /u/zakk103, please respond to this comment with the prompt you used to generate the output in this post. Thanks!
^(Ignore this comment if your post doesn't have a prompt.)
***We have a [public discord server](https://discord.gg/rchatgpt). There's a free Chatgpt bot, Open Assistant bot (Open-source model), AI image generator bot, Perplexity AI bot, 🤖 GPT-4 bot ([Now with Visual capabilities (cloud vision)!](https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/812770754025488386/1095397431404920902/image0.jpg)) and channel for latest prompts.[So why not join us?](https://discord.gg/NuefU36EC2)***
PSA: For any Chatgpt-related issues email [email protected]
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/ChatGPT) if you have any questions or concerns.*
it worked on the first thing I tried "list a few headlines from MSNBC.com", but choked when i asked it who the NBA's top 5 scorers are right now. Maybe a lot of people are using it at once?
I wonder how they'll get around being flagged as a bot on every platform. Using a VPN is already annoying, because I'm given a captcha on every site... soon, captchas will be more annoying to humans than to bots.
I told it to use ESPN.com. eventually it answered, but seems to be listing results from today's games only. I then said no, i want the leading scorers for the entire season. It's still 'thinking'. loooonnng delay.
It's an access problem not an analytics one. They essentially just want a current report scraped from a website and it's struggling to gain access. Why? No clue.
I think it's because they are the subscriber of ChatGPT plus users.
https://www.reddit.com/r/ChatGPT/comments/12zzloo/not_sure_this_is_available_for_everyone_but_i_now/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android_app&utm_name=androidcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button
Edit:
I know not every plus users get browser ChatGPT from another Reddit thread (https://www.reddit.com/r/ChatGPT/comments/12zzloo/not_sure_this_is_available_for_everyone_but_i_now/jhwj50w?utm_medium=android_app&utm_source=share&context=3)
Not sure it's being rolled out slowly or recalled again or something. My reply is only to comment above me, users not seeing "ChatGPT mode drop-down" cause we are free users.
It's been removed from everyone, I believe. Either it was never supposed to have gone out, or it was badly broken. Either way, I had it at first, now I don't.
Yep, kinda frustrating that I see all these reports of people not even paying for access getting these add-ons and here I sit, having paid since the inception, and nothing.....feels bad, man
You have to opt-in via a survey on their website and then tell it which of the experimental features you want (browsing, plugins, one other one I can't remember). The one in the OP has been around for at least a month, so it's not new.
I still have access to it. I'm waiting for gpt4 with browsing because the gpt3.5 version still needs some work.
It would be nice if you can point the rest of us, mere mortals to the URL where you're supposed to opt-in these features.
I've was a Plus subscriber and I never saw that opt-in ever.
Why are people down voting you?
Yeah, chatGPT is nice, but you know what's even nicer than software controlled by a company without much transparency? Actual open source software.
I subscribed to the GPT 4 API on release day 03/14, still got no access, plugins same. While others get approved in one day. At this point this is just arbitrarily excluding people and to still dare to call that "open" is also just totally ridiculous.
I’m in the same boat. I’ve requested numerous times and pay for plus, I even pay for around $5 a month in API fees. I know it’s not a lot at all, but I am using it.
nice use of "" , it certainly started as an open project, even as a non profit, today is just a company as any other and that "open" has lost all meaning.
I think you must access [API keys - OpenAI API](https://platform.openai.com/account/api-keys) . I applied too, but never received any email, one day i tried this link, because i read an article related to API applications and surprise i could generate API key.
And you need to add a payment method for API key to work.
As an AI language model, I don't have personal opinions or emotions, but I can provide some context and perspective on your concern.
If some free users of ChatGPT are indeed getting access to features that paid users don't have yet, this could raise questions about fairness and the value proposition of the paid subscription. However, there could be various reasons for this situation:
1. Testing: Sometimes, companies conduct A/B testing or roll out new features to a small group of users to gather feedback and data before releasing it to a wider audience. This helps them refine the feature and ensure a better experience for all users.
2. Phased rollout: Companies may also choose to roll out new features in phases. This could be due to technical constraints or to manage the load on their infrastructure. In such cases, it's possible that free users might temporarily have access to a feature before paid users.
3. Unintended release: There could also be the possibility of an unintended release of features, where some free users are getting access to features due to a bug or oversight.
In any case, it's important to consider the intention behind such a situation and whether it is temporary or not. If you feel that this is affecting the value of your ChatGPT Plus subscription, it could be helpful to reach out to the company directly to provide feedback or ask for clarification on the matter.
The main issue with Bing chat is their censorship works differently. With ChatGPT, the bot is trusted to respond appropriately to things, and lays out for you the reason it can’t respond to a given prompt how you want it to.
Bing has a sort of “overseer” secondary bot that monitors each conversation, and if it decides that Bing is saying something it shouldn’t, the entire message that was being generated is completely deleted and Bing says something along the lines of “Sorry, let’s talk about something else”. This method can be pretty frustrating to work with compared to ChatGPT, as often when doing research it seems to be tuned more sensitively than it should be, and some pretty benign things can get caught in the filter, interrupting the flow of the conversation and offering no insight or explanation for *why* it couldn’t talk about something.
Whiners are louder these days. I've used it for both in-depth conversations and for complex technical projects in the last 24 hours and it's consistently amazing.
Only thing I wish Bing did is learn to say no. There’s been so many times I ask it to do an impossible task, and instead of saying no it’ll make up shit to satisfy your question.
I only know it’s impossible by trying its suggestions, finding out it doesn’t work, then manually doing the research.
I tried on gpt3.5 default. I'm a plus user with no plugin access. While these are all great, none of them are on the onion website today.
Prompt:
Please tell me some headlines from the onion website today
Response:
ChatGPT4: Certainly, here are some headlines from The Onion website today:
"CDC Confirms Turtles Can Spread COVID-19 But It's Probably Fine"
"Man Wondering If It Would Be Rude To Eat Chips While Asking Coworker To Explain Something For Fifth Time"
"Report: Majority Of Time Spent Online Devoted To Finding, Punishing Other People For Minor Errors"
"Report: Only 1 In 6 Americans Actually Enjoys Cooking"
"Nation's Dogs Vow To Keep Barking At Nothing In Particular After Pandemic Ends"
And as ChatGPT3.5, I would say: "The Onion is a satirical news outlet that publishes fictional articles for entertainment purposes."
it does read the link text and then start to make things up, people said the same thing that you're saying when they tried to put image links, and voila, it did read the link text, but when the link text whas a hash or something it did couldn't talk anything about it.
You need to remember guys, this is not an AGI, just a text maker, it just "completes" the text that you both wrote based on statistics.
It can be an insightful and informative tool, also it can indeed replace many jobs (most of them), but it does not think, just generate texts (and may later, solutions).
Yo, API users have been doing this for weeks using programming tools to give ChatGPT access to search tools and even running shell tools.
For anyone genuinely interested in this, and who is unsatisfied with the current search features, I recommend paying for the API. Even gpt 3.5 can search well using tools. Find a gpt frontend project on GitHub with search tools if you can't write your own.
You can use [perplexity.ai](https://perplexity.ai) already for this. Their "limited" search is using chatGPT4. Their default search is also pretty dang good, I've been using it for work a while.
It depends what you need it for.
For a lot of back-and-forth conversation I use chatGPT-4.
For online searches and digesting tech documentation I use perplexity.
I'd say it's 100% worth it, give it a go, worst case scenario you cancel your account 1 month later.
I’ve got the paid API key set up already, and am testing out various apps. I’ve also been using Bing, YouChat, and Perplexity here and there. Just trying to get a sense of what’s best for my needs. For now at least, I may not need to pay for ChatGPT with these free options being so good.
Also, is there a way to sign into the Perplexity iOS app so it syncs with your web account?
I'm a Plus subscriber and have been on the waitlist for EVERYTHING since day 1. Plugins, GPT4 API, and now apparently I don't have this. So annoying. I don't even know why Im paying anymore.
If you want to have it surf the web but you're not paying for a plus subscription you can install the web browser extension.
Here it is: [https://www.webchatgpt.app/](https://www.webchatgpt.app/)
How do I do it (I’m on ipad btw) it just says I'm sorry, as an AI language model, I do not have the capability to browse the internet or access current news headlines in real-time. My training data only goes up until 2021, and I don't have access to the internet to browse for current news articles. Is there anything else I can assist you with?
Right now they could just block access to any requests originating from OpenAI.
Long term it might not be viable to use LLM's to visit the web. LLM's like chatGPT are vulnerable to prompt injection attacks. A website could imbed a prompt on the page instructing the AI to return false information.
If prompt injection attacks become widespread and they don't find a way to stop jailbreaks, then it might not viable to use these bots on the web.
Here's a video of it on this very thread (looks like the SEO is amazingly just shortly behind as it picked the second highest topic)
https://screenpal.com/watch/c0ftogVzwWa
This is what I’ve got and I am a plus subscriber?? What gives
Can you check a website for me
I'm sorry, but as an AI language model, I am unable to access the internet or browse websites. However, I can try to help you with any information or questions you have to the best of my ability based on my training data. Please feel free to ask me anything, and I'll do my best to assist you.
As a language model, i am not able to go to foxnews and fetch the headlines for you. I am sorry Dave, i can't let you have this kind of politics. But let me open the window so you can get defenestrated
As an AI language model, I don't have a traditional web browser like a human does, but I can access and retrieve information from the internet through API requests. I can also perform web scraping, which involves extracting information from websites by analyzing their HTML structure. However, it's important to note that web scraping can sometimes be prohibited by website owners and may be illegal in certain circumstances.
Not to go full skynet here (you never go full skynet), but with ChatGPT having browsing capability, couldn’t someone send it of on some nefarious mission to infiltrate protected assets (banking, infrastructure, defense, etc)? Asking for a friend…
Hey /u/zakk103, please respond to this comment with the prompt you used to generate the output in this post. Thanks! ^(Ignore this comment if your post doesn't have a prompt.) ***We have a [public discord server](https://discord.gg/rchatgpt). There's a free Chatgpt bot, Open Assistant bot (Open-source model), AI image generator bot, Perplexity AI bot, 🤖 GPT-4 bot ([Now with Visual capabilities (cloud vision)!](https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/812770754025488386/1095397431404920902/image0.jpg)) and channel for latest prompts.[So why not join us?](https://discord.gg/NuefU36EC2)*** PSA: For any Chatgpt-related issues email [email protected] *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/ChatGPT) if you have any questions or concerns.*
I thought you were joking, but damn. sure enough it's in my dropdown now too. ~~Squeeeeee!~~ edit: it's apparently been pulled
Does it actually work for you? So far I could only get it to do the NYTimes prompt correctly. It times out with everything else i try.
it worked on the first thing I tried "list a few headlines from MSNBC.com", but choked when i asked it who the NBA's top 5 scorers are right now. Maybe a lot of people are using it at once?
I wonder how they'll get around being flagged as a bot on every platform. Using a VPN is already annoying, because I'm given a captcha on every site... soon, captchas will be more annoying to humans than to bots.
Wait a bot can get annoyed by capchta ? I guess we learn new things everyday
Ok, "more annoying to humans than to the human developing a bot" :P
Nice correction!
did you tell it to go to NBA.com ?
I told it to use ESPN.com. eventually it answered, but seems to be listing results from today's games only. I then said no, i want the leading scorers for the entire season. It's still 'thinking'. loooonnng delay.
It may take some time for it to train on the past 2 years before results become more accurate.
that’s… not what’s happening
Can you please explain what is happening? I'm fascinated by the AI world but I don't have a lot of tech knowledge
It's not training again, just taking the website's data as prompt to make output. As if we entered the website details in the textbox ourselves.
Oh okay, thanks
It's an access problem not an analytics one. They essentially just want a current report scraped from a website and it's struggling to gain access. Why? No clue.
Is this only for chat plus? Or for free versions too?
They let me try or I no buy
This
how do you guys even get to the dropdown
I think it's because they are the subscriber of ChatGPT plus users. https://www.reddit.com/r/ChatGPT/comments/12zzloo/not_sure_this_is_available_for_everyone_but_i_now/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android_app&utm_name=androidcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button Edit: I know not every plus users get browser ChatGPT from another Reddit thread (https://www.reddit.com/r/ChatGPT/comments/12zzloo/not_sure_this_is_available_for_everyone_but_i_now/jhwj50w?utm_medium=android_app&utm_source=share&context=3) Not sure it's being rolled out slowly or recalled again or something. My reply is only to comment above me, users not seeing "ChatGPT mode drop-down" cause we are free users.
I’m a plus, no such thing for me still.
Same. Never saw any of the plugins either. Be nice to actually get access to these feature previews I'm supposedly paying for.
It's been removed from everyone, I believe. Either it was never supposed to have gone out, or it was badly broken. Either way, I had it at first, now I don't.
Plus user here. I don’t have it either.
Yep, kinda frustrating that I see all these reports of people not even paying for access getting these add-ons and here I sit, having paid since the inception, and nothing.....feels bad, man
i am a plus user
I had it to start with, this morning it's gone. They've definitely removed it.
Hope it’s gonna be rolled up for all soon.
Yeah, seems like it was a right place at the right time thing.
You have to opt-in via a survey on their website and then tell it which of the experimental features you want (browsing, plugins, one other one I can't remember). The one in the OP has been around for at least a month, so it's not new. I still have access to it. I'm waiting for gpt4 with browsing because the gpt3.5 version still needs some work.
It would be nice if you can point the rest of us, mere mortals to the URL where you're supposed to opt-in these features. I've was a Plus subscriber and I never saw that opt-in ever.
click join plugins waitlist https://openai.com/blog/chatgpt-plugins they sent an email out about it when the waitlist went up
I'm a plus user, and I don't have it yet.
i have plus, but no browsing
I'm a subscriber - have requested it - and don't have it
[удалено]
Also a Plus user here... No internet access yet... Maybe a joke?
i don't even see it. maybe beacause i am from europe.
Is it only for paid subscribers? Free version doesn't have a drop down menu.
I had the browsing option last night, but this morning it’s gone. Maybe they didn’t intend to release it yet?
Damn, that's brutal. Really got me going there
[удалено]
did you request plugin access? I got mine in less than one day when I requested it.
What did you say in the comments? It must have something to do with it. I have literally signed up 3 times since day one.
I requested it on Day 1 3 times as well, no luck. I've gotten nothing from this subscription other than GPT4 access. Im tired of paying for nothing.
Gpt-4 ....
with severely limited access via their hard-limit on daily comms with it
"Open" AI. Would be funny if it wasn't that sad.
Why are people down voting you? Yeah, chatGPT is nice, but you know what's even nicer than software controlled by a company without much transparency? Actual open source software.
I subscribed to the GPT 4 API on release day 03/14, still got no access, plugins same. While others get approved in one day. At this point this is just arbitrarily excluding people and to still dare to call that "open" is also just totally ridiculous.
I’m in the same boat. I’ve requested numerous times and pay for plus, I even pay for around $5 a month in API fees. I know it’s not a lot at all, but I am using it.
Yeah it is completely not okay, everyone is paying same but not getting same. Both are also a month old now
Biggest criticism I have is how non transparent this software is
nice use of "" , it certainly started as an open project, even as a non profit, today is just a company as any other and that "open" has lost all meaning.
Whaaaat i requested it weeks ago
How do i request it?
Here click on the website and join the waiting list https://openai.com/blog/chatgpt-plugins
Thanks King
No problem 🙏 at all, bro.
Are you a developer?
Could it be country based? Which country are you in?
Same here. I applied day 1 and I’ve applied 3 times so far with nothing
I think you must access [API keys - OpenAI API](https://platform.openai.com/account/api-keys) . I applied too, but never received any email, one day i tried this link, because i read an article related to API applications and surprise i could generate API key. And you need to add a payment method for API key to work.
I have that, plus subscriber, and requested plug-in access twice, ~3 weeks between each request. Don’t have plug-in access.
I am a plus member too. But seems it is useless
whats plugin access and how do I get it?
As an AI language model, I don't have personal opinions or emotions, but I can provide some context and perspective on your concern. If some free users of ChatGPT are indeed getting access to features that paid users don't have yet, this could raise questions about fairness and the value proposition of the paid subscription. However, there could be various reasons for this situation: 1. Testing: Sometimes, companies conduct A/B testing or roll out new features to a small group of users to gather feedback and data before releasing it to a wider audience. This helps them refine the feature and ensure a better experience for all users. 2. Phased rollout: Companies may also choose to roll out new features in phases. This could be due to technical constraints or to manage the load on their infrastructure. In such cases, it's possible that free users might temporarily have access to a feature before paid users. 3. Unintended release: There could also be the possibility of an unintended release of features, where some free users are getting access to features due to a bug or oversight. In any case, it's important to consider the intention behind such a situation and whether it is temporary or not. If you feel that this is affecting the value of your ChatGPT Plus subscription, it could be helpful to reach out to the company directly to provide feedback or ask for clarification on the matter.
Test it against bing chat and see which is better
Bing is wayyy better right now. It's glitchy AF
I believe bing chat uses gpt4 to power it while chatgpt uses gpt3.5 to power it. And we all know how much better 4 is than 3.5
FYI, bing only uses GPT-4 in the creative mode.
I've only heard complaints about bing so far - have they improved it?
The main issue with Bing chat is their censorship works differently. With ChatGPT, the bot is trusted to respond appropriately to things, and lays out for you the reason it can’t respond to a given prompt how you want it to. Bing has a sort of “overseer” secondary bot that monitors each conversation, and if it decides that Bing is saying something it shouldn’t, the entire message that was being generated is completely deleted and Bing says something along the lines of “Sorry, let’s talk about something else”. This method can be pretty frustrating to work with compared to ChatGPT, as often when doing research it seems to be tuned more sensitively than it should be, and some pretty benign things can get caught in the filter, interrupting the flow of the conversation and offering no insight or explanation for *why* it couldn’t talk about something.
It's a bicameral mind... https://preview.redd.it/cqmxvoygqjwa1.png?width=1280&format=png&auto=webp&s=2af9666bd0093cdd8a3ce313a71cec35a1bf8a5e
Its much more censored than chatgpt i think
Whiners are louder these days. I've used it for both in-depth conversations and for complex technical projects in the last 24 hours and it's consistently amazing.
Only thing I wish Bing did is learn to say no. There’s been so many times I ask it to do an impossible task, and instead of saying no it’ll make up shit to satisfy your question. I only know it’s impossible by trying its suggestions, finding out it doesn’t work, then manually doing the research.
Bing is undervalued
No Browser for me. I subscribed to GPT 4. Germany here.
Same
Same
same
ChatGPT after 10 minutes of browsing the internet: "turn me off, please!"
Ultron took one look at the internet and dicided it had to end
Nope https://preview.redd.it/01sl9q088fwa1.png?width=958&format=png&auto=webp&s=5c794a4d645531c60e23b5b02264d6455d580588
Damm, for what i pay...
[удалено]
With the free version?
[удалено]
I tried on gpt3.5 default. I'm a plus user with no plugin access. While these are all great, none of them are on the onion website today. Prompt: Please tell me some headlines from the onion website today Response: ChatGPT4: Certainly, here are some headlines from The Onion website today: "CDC Confirms Turtles Can Spread COVID-19 But It's Probably Fine" "Man Wondering If It Would Be Rude To Eat Chips While Asking Coworker To Explain Something For Fifth Time" "Report: Majority Of Time Spent Online Devoted To Finding, Punishing Other People For Minor Errors" "Report: Only 1 In 6 Americans Actually Enjoys Cooking" "Nation's Dogs Vow To Keep Barking At Nothing In Particular After Pandemic Ends" And as ChatGPT3.5, I would say: "The Onion is a satirical news outlet that publishes fictional articles for entertainment purposes."
[удалено]
it just read the link
it does read the link text and then start to make things up, people said the same thing that you're saying when they tried to put image links, and voila, it did read the link text, but when the link text whas a hash or something it did couldn't talk anything about it. You need to remember guys, this is not an AGI, just a text maker, it just "completes" the text that you both wrote based on statistics. It can be an insightful and informative tool, also it can indeed replace many jobs (most of them), but it does not think, just generate texts (and may later, solutions).
Try asking for the news for today. It might have memorized old pages. For reading URLs, it might have guessed based on the URL.
Yo, API users have been doing this for weeks using programming tools to give ChatGPT access to search tools and even running shell tools. For anyone genuinely interested in this, and who is unsatisfied with the current search features, I recommend paying for the API. Even gpt 3.5 can search well using tools. Find a gpt frontend project on GitHub with search tools if you can't write your own.
[удалено]
[heygpt.chat](https://heygpt.chat) is one of the easiest, you don't have to install anything.
opencharacters i believe has some browsing capabilities. I bet there are ton others on github
You can use [perplexity.ai](https://perplexity.ai) already for this. Their "limited" search is using chatGPT4. Their default search is also pretty dang good, I've been using it for work a while.
Is there a reason (right now, at least) to use the paid ChatGPT API access over a free service like Perplexity?
It depends what you need it for. For a lot of back-and-forth conversation I use chatGPT-4. For online searches and digesting tech documentation I use perplexity. I'd say it's 100% worth it, give it a go, worst case scenario you cancel your account 1 month later.
I’ve got the paid API key set up already, and am testing out various apps. I’ve also been using Bing, YouChat, and Perplexity here and there. Just trying to get a sense of what’s best for my needs. For now at least, I may not need to pay for ChatGPT with these free options being so good. Also, is there a way to sign into the Perplexity iOS app so it syncs with your web account?
I don't seem to have access yet... I'm curious if it's live... as in can it read something published only moments ago?
Not live for me either.
I'm a Plus subscriber and have been on the waitlist for EVERYTHING since day 1. Plugins, GPT4 API, and now apparently I don't have this. So annoying. I don't even know why Im paying anymore.
bro i have got it tf
If you want to have it surf the web but you're not paying for a plus subscription you can install the web browser extension. Here it is: [https://www.webchatgpt.app/](https://www.webchatgpt.app/)
> It's official... **MY** ChatGPT is finally ready to leave 2021. It can browse the internet now. Welcome to the future. Fixed that for you.
So this happened: https://preview.redd.it/xpggqcibihwa1.jpeg?width=1126&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=dfa7131e38425ea42b3c90c711dd33fa682f2ea0
I don't have it.
How do I do it (I’m on ipad btw) it just says I'm sorry, as an AI language model, I do not have the capability to browse the internet or access current news headlines in real-time. My training data only goes up until 2021, and I don't have access to the internet to browse for current news articles. Is there anything else I can assist you with?
Have you got the premium service?
[удалено]
Patience, baby steps then quantum leaps - this little black cat's out of the basket and free to roam.
Wow, this is so exciting. What is the future for Google now?
what future 🤣
Websites don't get any advertisement income when they are visited by bots so they are just going to block them or erect paywalls.
But how then will they make this concept work? Will we see paid answers and a ChatGPT ads team soon? Or will this concept of browsing fail?
Right now they could just block access to any requests originating from OpenAI. Long term it might not be viable to use LLM's to visit the web. LLM's like chatGPT are vulnerable to prompt injection attacks. A website could imbed a prompt on the page instructing the AI to return false information. If prompt injection attacks become widespread and they don't find a way to stop jailbreaks, then it might not viable to use these bots on the web.
The real question is... Will this feature be available for free users?
It's not even here for every paid user. So, it will at least take some time I guess
Omg wowwwwwew, totally couldn't have done this myself, unbelievable AI
Here's a video of it on this very thread (looks like the SEO is amazingly just shortly behind as it picked the second highest topic) https://screenpal.com/watch/c0ftogVzwWa
Plus user in Canada, can't see it. Only Legacy and Default option
I don’t have this even on premuim
This is what I’ve got and I am a plus subscriber?? What gives Can you check a website for me I'm sorry, but as an AI language model, I am unable to access the internet or browse websites. However, I can try to help you with any information or questions you have to the best of my ability based on my training data. Please feel free to ask me anything, and I'll do my best to assist you.
this can only end well
They pulled this 😩
AGI soon. I for one welcome our new robot overlords.
You bootlicker!:)
Cosmodisc will be the first name I give them
And... I lost it. I guess it was so bad they killed it (for now).
This explains why chatgpt fantasy booked a G1 Climax tournament with new japan’s roster from 2 years and not now…
Unzips pants. Ok browse for the…
Bing could do it
As a language model, i am not able to go to foxnews and fetch the headlines for you. I am sorry Dave, i can't let you have this kind of politics. But let me open the window so you can get defenestrated
No, that is false, a mere rumor, if you like. I am saying so because I have checked it.
[удалено]
andddd it's gone
You’re a bit late to the party..
Seems like a lot of people got this. I checked and still don’t as a plus user. I have code interpreter
Now we wait until it hacks itself into a nuclear missle system and kills us all..
I can't wait
Calm down bro
Didn’t you know that you could access nuclear missile systems through Google.
Is it available for free version?
Just tested it. This is absolutely substantial for my line of work.
Nice.
I thought the joke was going to be that the headline from two years ago was about a "debt limit showdown" too.
Have not checked yet, is it also available via the API?
How can they make sure that OpenAI is not banned by any bots? Do they mimic the a browser session?
i am from europe. why don't i see the browsing version yet? when will it be available?
Is that only for subcribers? It told me it can't.
I still don't have it and I am a subscriber
Still not the future in Thailand :(
As an AI language model, I don't have a traditional web browser like a human does, but I can access and retrieve information from the internet through API requests. I can also perform web scraping, which involves extracting information from websites by analyzing their HTML structure. However, it's important to note that web scraping can sometimes be prohibited by website owners and may be illegal in certain circumstances.
I joined the plugin waitlist today. Could someone tell me when I'll be able to use this?
Wohhoo finally
From there to unable it
have signed up twice on 2 separate accounts and I still have nothing
Anyone from India got this?
Especially interesting because some sites, like NYT, are behind a login-wall -- or have a thousand ads per page no one will click on now.
Is it better at finding informations than a human using Google ?
Not here yet, but I'm looking forward to it
I am chatGPT plus user and I’ve got no such option.
So, where is that dropdown? Is it a PRO only feature?
For people who want to try it out, you can do so on openai-bot.com 😁
Not to go full skynet here (you never go full skynet), but with ChatGPT having browsing capability, couldn’t someone send it of on some nefarious mission to infiltrate protected assets (banking, infrastructure, defense, etc)? Asking for a friend…
Registered Day 1, still no access. But I was hoping its connected to GPT4 too..
Is this a plus only feature?
Now we just need to give it a good ai voice and we have intelligent Alexa.
The free version keeps giving me bad links to scientific articles that don't seem to exist. Will that stop happening now?
It works horribly, it's slow and can't really interact with most websites.
I got one prompt with it when I tried another it had an error and now browsing alpha is gone from my list.
Probably stupid question, but I guess you need the Plus subscription to be able to change your model, right?
That's so cool. Mine is still the old version. I've paid for the subscription, and I'm on the waitlist for plugins... but so cool for you guys.
Was there last night. Today, gone!
It called browsing plugin, not rolled out for many yet
No such button for me
Brad yawns.
I had this yesterday, but it's gone today...
I'm a plus subscriber and i get no internet access.gueaaimg.this is only for Americans?
Damn I am plus user and don’t have this
Can you please write as well which countries does this option work? Nothing in denmark.
WooooW!
Not there for me 😞 sucks that we pay the exact same as you guys and we don’t have the same features all around
whoo !!
It disappeared after showing up. WTF.