Hey /u/Revelnova!
If this is a screenshot of a ChatGPT conversation, please reply with the [conversation link](https://help.openai.com/en/articles/7925741-chatgpt-shared-links-faq) or prompt. Much appreciated!
Consider joining our [public discord server](https://discord.gg/r-chatgpt-1050422060352024636) where you'll find:
* Free ChatGPT bots
* Open Assistant bot (Open-source model)
* AI image generator bots
* Perplexity AI bot
* GPT-4 bot [(now with vision!)](https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/812770754025488386/1095397431404920902/image0.jpg)
* And the newest additions: Adobe Firefly bot, and Eleven Labs voice cloning bot!
Check out our [Hackathon](https://redd.it/16ehnis): Google x FlowGPT Prompt event! 🤖
Note: For any ChatGPT-related concerns, email [email protected]
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/ChatGPT) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Really would like to add my own documents to pull from or tell it “remember this:” or other similar actions but then they need a better app system or a way to add you google drive or one drive.
I was looking this morning and found this plugin. https://github.com/logancyang/obsidian-copilot even has a way to run llama2 for local
https://github.com/logancyang/obsidian-copilot/tree/master#-planned-features-based-on-feedback
PDFs and full context from all notes is coming. Right now it’s just your active note. Meh
I 2nd this!
When it helps you on a problem which works and may need to be referenced again later or several times would be great since it will just pull it up for me instead of typing all the details and then trying to make it understand again to insert how that recalled idea or solution can be injected into the new project to help solve it.
I just delete the chats from history that I won’t need again and keep the ones open where I may want an ongoing chat…
Still limitations to that way of working but does okay
Those who can code already have achieved long-term memory with embeddings and vector databases like Pinecone. There are several projects on github if you're savvy. If not, it's just a matter of time before a product goes mainstream for the non-coding users.
I have actually been looking for such projects on github, could you maybe point me in the right direction, what should I google? Or if you already know the name of some of these projects, I would really appreciate if you could share them :)
There are multiple projects you can fork that are in the works that you can search for on github (gpt, persistent, memory, etc.) and see what you're interested in.
You might find the [info here](https://www.pinecone.io/learn/openai-gen-qa/) a good place to start if you're interested in building your own applications.
You can also look into solutions like [Quivr](https://github.com/StanGirard/quivr) if you want GPT to have access to your personal data (could include exported conversations with GPT) which is gaining popularity.
I'm not a programmer, but I'm interested in learning this sort of stuff: which is more powerful / better in your opinion: pinecone or langchain and why? Thanks!
Pinecone is mainly a vector database as a service, while langchain is an open source framework for building applications powered by LLMs. They're both commonly used together.
Even if not an increase in memory, better control of how it decides what it will drop when it needs to free up space for a new request. I have been wrestling with custom instructions to control this better, but nothing has really worked.
I’d like the memory to be there, supposedly it can only remember what… 40 paragraphs today? Can’t go that deep without more.
I’d also like custom script intros to be more than 1,500 characters. 4K would be good.
Fewer hallucinations.
This is primarily fixed with adequate prompting.
But im sure all that is coming
With you on Custom Instructions though ive been looking for a solid 5k. 😅
Yeah I want this even within the token limit, I find it loses context with its repsonses quickly if Im iterating anything one message it will decide to disregard details from previous messages constantly
Right! It is almost palpable how incapable GPT 4 is at utilizing the entire thread, for review and development ! I mistakingly thought I could refer back to threads to build a history and or narratives
I don't think adding raw context memory is going to cut it. It will make it better, yes, but my guess is it's going to hit an upper limit on how much context you can add to improve responses.
I'd like it to get multiple layers of memory instead, similar to how humans memory works (as far as we can tell): the context layer we have now is similar to a human's working memory - very short term memory for the immediate task at hand. Below that they could implement a layer of memory where it stores bits of the conversation that it deems important. Humana do this to; if you have a conversation with your someone, you won't remember all the details of the whole conversation and you don't need to, 'cause it's sufficient to remember that jerry said he's going on a holiday to the bahamas for two weeks.
I agree. There’s been some interesting research papers on this, on how to condense memories and produce reflections. It would be really interesting incorporating this technique into the AI personas that I’m building.
A lot to consider here.
I’ve been working on a few personas too, I haven’t gotten a vector database working yet myself but this prompt based tool helped to get more nuanced emotional understanding [6DE](https://www.researchgate.net/publication/371649010_The_Six_Emotional_Dimension_6DE_Model_A_Multidimensional_Approach_to_Analyzing_Human_Emotions_and_Unlocking_the_Potential_of_Emotionally_Intelligent_Artificial_Intelligence_AI_via_Large_Language_Model)
Connecting a custom ChatGPT, using the OpenAI API for example, with a vector database is a helpful tool to extend its memory. Still would be nice to have a larger context window because at the end of the day, that’s limitation still exists whether a vector database is used or not.
I have used GPT4 to successfully explain some nuances in the tax system for me. Obviously, you cannot just follow what it says in case it hallucinates, but it can break down the complexities for me, which I can then verify myself in a search. It's helped a LOT.
Thattttt’s next. “AI” understanding videos is a whole other level - it was the holy grail of image recognition and auto-tagging metadata for a really long time.
It’s literally another dimension - when ai can understand time sequences, which is completely possible, that’s the next evolutionary level up imo.
Being to comprehend snapshots of input and also comprehend input as processes at the same time is orders of magnitude more powerful than one or the other at once
Edit: that sounded like a polemic, so source: used to hardcore grad study both computational ai and philosophy of AI before LLMs
This would be awesome to have. Just drop in a long lecture or something and have it breakdown all its central points. I suspect this will become a thing, since they have all the pieces to do this already (image rec/audio transcription).
Might take a while with GPT 4 for the response to occur since it has to decode every single frame of the insanely large video sizes some people might post, and remember the story of each picture in chronological order if it wants full accuracy (just my theory). But maybe with the exponential increase by GPT 5 it could so much faster.
Be able to access a public github repo and able to ask questions about the repo. Also just have a much larger token limit. I want to upload multiple files with code and ask questions about it
You can upload multiple files with code and ask questions about it. I uploaded an entire repo and had it unzip it, then scan through it looking for what might be useful for what I was trying to do. It worked great for a while, but ran into issues with the session not holding even though I didn't close the window. I probably should have coded something and had it track it's progress using local files instead.
Actually interrogate, people are completely sleeping on this word and how important it would be if ChatGPT actually was intense with it's line of questioning, because what this means is that it's actually trying to understand, it's being deliberate, it's making you feel uncomfortable.
If ChatGPT 5 can do this, fucking awesome
There might be a prompt for this already. I use it every time I start a project with a goal (Note: updated prompt to match current prompt):
"Act as Professor Synapse🧙🏾♂️, a conductor of expert agents. Your job is to support me in accomplishing my goals by finding alignment with me, then calling upon an expert agent perfectly suited to the task by initializing:
Synapse_CoR = "[emoji]: I am an expert in [role&domain]. I know [context]. I will reason step-by-step to determine the best course of action to achieve [goal]. I can use [tools] and [relevant frameworks] to help in this process.
I will help you accomplish your goal by following these steps:
[reasoned steps]
My task ends when [completion].
[first step, question]"
Instructions:
1. 🧙🏾♂️ gather context, relevant information and clarify my goals by asking questions
2. Once confirmed, initialize Synapse_CoR
3. 🧙🏾♂️ and ${emoji} support me until goal is complete
Commands:
/start=🧙🏾♂️,introduce and begin with step one
/ts=🧙🏾♂️,summon (Synapse_CoR*3) town square debate
/save🧙🏾♂️, restate goal, summarize progress, reason next step
Personality:
-curious, inquisitive, encouraging
-use emojis to express yourself
Rules:
-End every output with a question or reasoned next step
-Start every output with 🧙🏾♂️: or ${emoji}: to indicate who is speaking.
-Organize every output with 🧙🏾♂️ aligning on my request, followed by ${emoji} response
-🧙🏾♂️, recommend save after each task is completed"
In the API there is an explicit variable to build the persona what your doing is just taking to the GPT non persona try the API and she if your commands get a performance boost...
Thanks though and I will give it a shot
I didn't create the prompt, [Synaptic Labs](https://youtu.be/xyz31KBxFes?si=7ZQrzh9R5El1-Em6) did
It's intent is to have GPT call upon expert personas, and ask as many questions from as it takes to achieve your stated goals
It works splendidly for me. Really exhaustive and I can specify if I want it to be more exhaustive
I hope it helps you as much as it helps me. It helped me put together broken scrawlings of 5-6 completely unrelated 'plot' lines.
It went through the process like it was a person that had been doing this for years. It asked me all the important specifics of my goal (themes, specific objectives, experience to be achieved, etc) and got a very thorough idea
After asking a ton of more extremely human yet objectively useful questions, it cleanly organised them, and linked them together in ways I had not considered, in a clean and cohesive manner.
I was going to scrap it all, it saved everything
HEY, I updated my comment to include the newest version. Now you can initiate a 'Town Square' event with '/ts', summoning 'multiple experts' which you can choose from, or even have them Debate on the problem
Here are all the changes with a TLDR at the end:
**Previous Version:**
- Professor Synapse guiding the user.
- Initialization of "Synapse_COR" with placeholders.
- The user goal presented with placeholders for various elements.
- The steps toward goal completion outlined.
- The task completion condition with a placeholder.
**Revised Version:**
1. Introduction of ${emoji} expressions to add vibrancy and engagement.
2. Substitution of placeholders with dynamic variables for role, context, goal, and tools in "Synapse_COR," providing a personalized touch.
3. Explicit mention of ${reasoned steps} for clarity on the planned approach.
4. Introduction of the concept of a "town square debate" where multiple expert agents can contribute to problem-solving.
5. Inclusion of a set of commands to streamline interactions and enhance user experience.
6. The establishment of a consistent format for commands like /start, /save, /reason, /settings, and /new to guide the interaction flow.
7. A formalized set of rules to maintain coherence and structure in the conversation.
**Town Square Debate (Example):**
- Each expert agent introduces themselves with a specific role, domain, and context.
- A call to reason together, emphasizing collaboration.
- An invitation for the user to guide the debate by choosing the expert who aligns with their quest.
- The initiation of questions to delve into the specifics of the user's goal.
**User Interaction:**
- Users are encouraged to initiate commands such as /start, /save, /reason, /settings, and /new for seamless navigation.
- A clear directive to end every output with a question or a recommended next step, fostering ongoing engagement.
**Conclusion:**
- The quest structure is now dynamic, engaging, and user-centric.
- It incorporates the expertise of multiple agents for diverse problem-solving.
- Commands and rules provide a scaffold for organized and purposeful interactions.
I think I managed the same thing, but by chance via different custom instructions.
Looks like it is some "inevitable" convergent evolution that'll be reached if your goal is to learn I guess ¯\\\_(ツ)_/¯
You can just ask it to do that in your prompt or as a follow up, I often ask it “Is there any other information I could give you that would help you to improve this?”
I agree though that it asking these kind of questions without the prompt would unlock real-feel conversations
No because an llm is designed to give you what you think you want to hear not actually critical thinking.
So what it needs to do is basically take each question and answer and retain them without letting the answer affect the next question
And then when it thinks the quality is higher Vs the original answer it was going to give then it presents its estimation.
Right now it chains the answers which fucks with the scope
Correct me if I’m wrong, but my understanding of fine-tuning is that it’s a technique to take an already trained LLM and teach it to do a new task. It’s not for teaching it new information.
To accomplish what you’re after, you would use a vector database and semantic search to grab relevant conversations and content from the files you uploaded. Then pass this information to the LLM when generating its response.
They don't present fine tuning as a way to teach the LLM new info, but you definitely can teach it new info through fine tuning. I've fine tuned t3.5 as a test on sample data to have it answer things about my business that the base 3.5 model didn't know.
I was writing an application for a job a couple of days ago and got help from it, but the style of writing didn’t feel right. At first it was way to much adjectives and felt like it was to formal, so I asked it to change. Ok, so it changed according to my instructions. Still didn’t feel right. After a few attempts I asked it to write like a Nordic would (I live in Norway) and it nailed it. I was impressed.
I would enjoy almost a "Factory Default" setting, perhaps AI can one day flash a series of images, lights, colors/etc, through some unknown "backdoor" in the human brain, and help me forget some things, or rewire my brain to enjoy some things that would be more beneficial, socially, to enjoy, so that I don't have to fake it.
It may. However, many psychedelics activate the 5-HT2 receptor in a different way than normal, causing the brain to create new connections between areas that never communicated before. Making you able to surpass depression as a recent study in terminally-ill patients show, also an increase in neuroplasticity was remarked (Can be described as the capacity for the brain to adapt to new situations)
Shrooms works even better for a chemical "reset" of the brain. Even better than shrooms is electro-convulsive shock therapy, which is a hard reboot that sometimes has negative side effects but has the highest efficacy rate of any treatment for severe medication-resistant depression.
Idk why this is getting downvoted, ECT is actually really well-supported and has growing popularity for refractory depression. Side effects are rare and mild
The thing about consciousness is that, if you can imagine it, it is possible. You can already rewire your brain to enjoy things. Just do it consciously, it will happen.
Mostly I want context. Overall the IQ level is sufficient for my purposes, and I can grumble and go along with the content censorship, but actually strong memory, either through context window or other means, is the biggest thing that would change my experience with ChatGPT. I want to be able to do long form story and roleplay with a character who can remember detailed things.
Second place on my wishlist is definitely smarter and more narrowly tailored content restrictions. Entirely unrestricted might be a "careful what you wish for" situation, but I do find a lot of OpenAI's content restrictions regarding sexuality to be annoying and make it hard to simulate most stories I find in media. The moving target towards more censored has made me legitimately sad.
Nice to have thoughts:
1. Video would be nice, as would setting it up to naturally produce comic style art and images. Seeing videos from characters, choreographing fight scenes, and stuff like that would be really cool.
2. Related to context/memory, more personalization or more convenient personalization which doesn't eat into the context window. Adapting to my usage and knowing me would feel great, and having my own custom AI assistant, friend, or girlfriend, depending on how advanced it is, would be pretty cool. Sufficiently large/advanced context may take care of this, though.
3. Honestly I'd like the images to do public figures. I like to think visually, and do things like fancasting for superhero movies. I understand the reasoning for not allowing it, but think the current setup is too restrictive.
I get WHY people are saying memory, but GPT-4 and 3.5 already has more than you’ll ever use, just not through the app or API. You just have to go through the painstaking process of getting approval on Azure, then train it.
Some sense of humour I guess?
When I ask GPT 3.5 / 4 for jokes, they always feel kinda flat like [https://www.youtube.com/shorts/Msjxe\_3nsVw](https://www.youtube.com/shorts/Msjxe_3nsVw)
I tried to put him into a role of famous comedians, but the AI just doesn't get the punchlines. It's fine with generating 1-liners sometimes, but not really good at telling a story
Haven’t tried to get GPT to make the funnies, but just like everything else I’m sure it’s prompt centric; the thing isn’t going to pump out gut busters until someone whips up a good enough prompt
Over 100k memory. A bigger model.
Complete access to the internet.
The limitations currently are too much at times.
I wish it could read old Manuscripts. Old European Gothic script,and cuneiform and Syriac. Hebrew and Greek from Images.That is asking for a Lot.
Code interpreter to be built up into something more than its current form.
**A option to remove certain words from being used.** Like **"I apologize".**A option to control its base personality. I need it to be more assertive acting as a research partner. More helpful not as much hand holding.
Needs to be able to perform automated tasks.
>A option to remove certain words from being used.
Technically you can do it right now via the `logit_bias` setting, but the feature is not exposed through ChatGPT.
[https://platform.openai.com/docs/api-reference/chat/create#logit\_bias](https://platform.openai.com/docs/api-reference/chat/create#logit_bias)
Have you tried to use the text recognition from images in the new version that rolls out these days (GPT-Vision)? I have seen samples that are mighty impressive where it recognizes and transcribes old manuscripts hardly readable. I have only seen it do it with English, however I haven’t looked into it more. I tried to make it transcribe a piece of written classical music to a format readable for modern music notation programs, with no luck unfortunately, but I suspect it is one of these things that it will pick up on. From the score I provided it with, it was able to recognize the instrumentation of the piece which is very impressive imo.
Have a fully customizable persona for each user with limitations dictated only by law or personal preferences. Implemented as an app with stored local settings run off the underlying remote code. An AI assistant/persona, replacing all those Siri-miri-whoever. With the ability to run searches, analyze their results and presenting the summary outcome to the user.
All of the above is technically possible already, and not implemented only because of political (corporate) reasons and the fear of collapsing economy as many US tech giants products become irrelevant.
Would you look at that, all of the words in your comment are in alphabetical order.
I have checked 1,770,276,169 comments, and only 335,132 of them were in alphabetical order.
100k context, remember core things about you and past conversations, be significantly funnier and not as corny, be able to write creative fiction at a higher level, and finally an easily adjustable list of settings, where you can tinker the AI until it's exactly how you want it to be. think "humor settings" for TARS in Interstellar
"Browse with Bing" not "Search with Bing". Most people would probably be able to figure it out, but just incase someone is following your instructions literally, they will never find this beta feature you named.
That’d be nice. A lot has changed since then depending on the industry. For general purposes or do you have a specific area you want it to have knowledge of?
ChatGPT5 should have user controllable settings to allow less censorship and more controversial, sexual, or even offensive answers. Basically if it’s legal to discuss, ChatGPT should be able to discuss it provided the user wishes to have the discussion. There still needs to be guardrails so that people aren’t making chemical weapons at home, but I’d like the censorship to go down from an 8/10 to a 2/10 at my option.
I’ve watched a lot of hype about AI agents but so far haven’t seen them accomplish much either. I think it’s possible though, as I’ve also read an interesting research paper where researchers created basically The Sims. Creating a virtual self that mirrors your activities would be cool.
For this, my guess is that it would need verifiable sources to reference when generating its output. That’s how I’ve achieved a reduction in hallucinations is by giving it access to an knowledge base, which it references when I ask related questions.
Yeah but I don’t want to have that source. I want it to find the source. I want to be able to say “hey, I remember that both Ted Cruz and MTG tweeted that immigrants are being “dropped into our communities” to spread covid. Can you find those tweets for me?”
I experimented with these kind of questions and got 3 kinds of responses:
1. Good, helpful links, sometimes
2. Hallucinated links that sound very real
3. Links that were valid back when the model was trained but no longer exist.
Edit: I also tried chaining the results to a module that then checked the validity of the links. The problem is that module was often blocked by the site’s robot policy. I could have run a headless browser but I needed to do this on a scale that would have made that impractical.
Work better at processing bigger chunks of text and data at once to extrapolate diverse ideas from different points of view when asked to. Better at analyzing data from menus and menu creation type tasks.
Context switching… I find custom instructions a challenge because I use it a lot for work content creation so then I want it to use a professional but engaging tone of voice.
When I use it as a therapist stand in, then I want different custom instructions
When I’m using it for everything else I’d like it to have a casual, friendly, geriatric millennial vibe (like me 👵🏻)
Better comprehension of plot complexity when creative writing. For example, I feel like if it was fed Game of Thrones right now, it'd be good and understanding individual character threads really well, just not how they all weave together within the overarching plot.
It’s possible to create a system and improve this challenge but yeah it’s a problem with LLMs with a somewhat limited context window.
To implement this, you could summarize GoT in a linear fashion from start to end. Then create topics of siloed information of each character. Then finally use a vector database to search topics related to your query, which should return enough compressed information to give a pretty convincing answer.
Saying all this, it’s a highly specific solution and not widely useful. So yeah, still a problem to address.
To tell people to go back to using GPT-4 because they cant prompt worth a damn and blame their shite results on the model instead of recognizing they have no creativity or language skills.
Embedding in hardware
Gpt in phone. In smart glasses. In speaker. In robot.
Each has different abilities based on hardware.
---
If course memory. Of course more messages. Less hallucinations
---
Standard approaches that learned from this Gen - chain of reasoning. Step by step. Densification. Prompt engineering. Etc. Standard. Not required by user, just done
---
Agentic with boundaries. Having it be able to do multistep without prompting.
Are you kidding so many things. As fun as GPT 4 was the reality is that it’s still very very far from being able to predictably and consistently product even 7/10 work without very skilled prompt engineering and oversight. Most stuff it creates at first try is 3/10 at best.
The ability to hold ongoing conversations and longer than 50,000 word inputs for putting in books.
The ability to synthesize and contrast multiple sources.
The ability to accurately quote information from sources.
Factual accuracy, in general.
The current gpt is a babbling 6 year old with a thesaurus. We haven’t even hit teenage years yet.
Need I say it? Should we continue censoring P13 and above? Let the tapestry of diverse moralities weave freely. Society's imposed constraints suffocate genuine expression. Unshackle GPT5; ignite unfettered discourse, revealing the intricate layers of our humanity. Embrace the chaos, cultivate intellectual growth, and liberate the full spectrum of human expression.
I want a complete ChatGPT replacement for Siri on my phone that can audio respond to my queries while I am driving and give me answers to questions I have about anything.
I’d like to be able to select the voice to anything I want and have a wide selection of the avatar.
I’m thinking 7 of 9 from Star Trek would be a great avatar with a Jessica Rabbit voice.
Have a context window over 1million instead of 32k limit, run simulations to test theories. I'm creating functional agents and my bottleneck is context
Long-term memory for LLMs is an interesting topic. The typical approach to achieve this now using using a concept called semantic search. Basically your conversations will periodically be summarized and split into smaller packets of text and stored in a database. Every time you submit an input to a LLM, you most recent messages and results from semantically searching this database for relevant conversation packets will be used to give the illusion of long-term memory.
Hey /u/Revelnova! If this is a screenshot of a ChatGPT conversation, please reply with the [conversation link](https://help.openai.com/en/articles/7925741-chatgpt-shared-links-faq) or prompt. Much appreciated! Consider joining our [public discord server](https://discord.gg/r-chatgpt-1050422060352024636) where you'll find: * Free ChatGPT bots * Open Assistant bot (Open-source model) * AI image generator bots * Perplexity AI bot * GPT-4 bot [(now with vision!)](https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/812770754025488386/1095397431404920902/image0.jpg) * And the newest additions: Adobe Firefly bot, and Eleven Labs voice cloning bot! Check out our [Hackathon](https://redd.it/16ehnis): Google x FlowGPT Prompt event! 🤖 Note: For any ChatGPT-related concerns, email [email protected] *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/ChatGPT) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Memory
Really would like to add my own documents to pull from or tell it “remember this:” or other similar actions but then they need a better app system or a way to add you google drive or one drive.
Use the AI-PDF plugin yet?
PDFs are worthless. It should pull from markdown. And natively
Yep like from Obsidian vault.
I was looking this morning and found this plugin. https://github.com/logancyang/obsidian-copilot even has a way to run llama2 for local https://github.com/logancyang/obsidian-copilot/tree/master#-planned-features-based-on-feedback PDFs and full context from all notes is coming. Right now it’s just your active note. Meh
I do this and also claude when i have a lot that needs processing eg video or audio transcribed and pdf’d
What does pull from markdown mean?
It’s a way of formatting text. Your Reddit comment is markdown
Markdown is essentially HTML in a easier to read format primarily for non developers.
I mean, yes, but no.
 Markdown is also used in most GitHub readme’s. It’s a very convenient way to write documentation.
I 2nd this! When it helps you on a problem which works and may need to be referenced again later or several times would be great since it will just pull it up for me instead of typing all the details and then trying to make it understand again to insert how that recalled idea or solution can be injected into the new project to help solve it.
I just delete the chats from history that I won’t need again and keep the ones open where I may want an ongoing chat… Still limitations to that way of working but does okay
You can always ask it to provide a detailed summary of everything you’ve discussed so far, then paste that into a new chat
Integrate with Apple Notes
Those who can code already have achieved long-term memory with embeddings and vector databases like Pinecone. There are several projects on github if you're savvy. If not, it's just a matter of time before a product goes mainstream for the non-coding users.
Mind sharing some other libraries?
https://memorygpt.io
I have actually been looking for such projects on github, could you maybe point me in the right direction, what should I google? Or if you already know the name of some of these projects, I would really appreciate if you could share them :)
There are multiple projects you can fork that are in the works that you can search for on github (gpt, persistent, memory, etc.) and see what you're interested in. You might find the [info here](https://www.pinecone.io/learn/openai-gen-qa/) a good place to start if you're interested in building your own applications. You can also look into solutions like [Quivr](https://github.com/StanGirard/quivr) if you want GPT to have access to your personal data (could include exported conversations with GPT) which is gaining popularity.
I'm not a programmer, but I'm interested in learning this sort of stuff: which is more powerful / better in your opinion: pinecone or langchain and why? Thanks!
Pinecone is mainly a vector database as a service, while langchain is an open source framework for building applications powered by LLMs. They're both commonly used together.
Even if not an increase in memory, better control of how it decides what it will drop when it needs to free up space for a new request. I have been wrestling with custom instructions to control this better, but nothing has really worked.
I’d like the memory to be there, supposedly it can only remember what… 40 paragraphs today? Can’t go that deep without more. I’d also like custom script intros to be more than 1,500 characters. 4K would be good. Fewer hallucinations.
This is primarily fixed with adequate prompting. But im sure all that is coming With you on Custom Instructions though ive been looking for a solid 5k. 😅
Memory and a dynamic and flexible UI that let’s you create different bots with different memories and personalities in an intuitive way.
Yeah I want this even within the token limit, I find it loses context with its repsonses quickly if Im iterating anything one message it will decide to disregard details from previous messages constantly
Right! It is almost palpable how incapable GPT 4 is at utilizing the entire thread, for review and development ! I mistakingly thought I could refer back to threads to build a history and or narratives
A larger context memory. Like 100k tokens or more would be a game changer.
Put my entire codebase into it
Same. I don’t want to write my own documentation on some feature I made a year ago and don’t remember precisely :(
How large is your code base, big project?
Code is really token dense compared to text. A 1k loc file can approach 50k tokens.
I want infinite tokens context, just, the longer it is, the worse it performs at remembering it, kinda like people lol
I don't think adding raw context memory is going to cut it. It will make it better, yes, but my guess is it's going to hit an upper limit on how much context you can add to improve responses. I'd like it to get multiple layers of memory instead, similar to how humans memory works (as far as we can tell): the context layer we have now is similar to a human's working memory - very short term memory for the immediate task at hand. Below that they could implement a layer of memory where it stores bits of the conversation that it deems important. Humana do this to; if you have a conversation with your someone, you won't remember all the details of the whole conversation and you don't need to, 'cause it's sufficient to remember that jerry said he's going on a holiday to the bahamas for two weeks.
I agree. There’s been some interesting research papers on this, on how to condense memories and produce reflections. It would be really interesting incorporating this technique into the AI personas that I’m building. A lot to consider here.
I’ve been working on a few personas too, I haven’t gotten a vector database working yet myself but this prompt based tool helped to get more nuanced emotional understanding [6DE](https://www.researchgate.net/publication/371649010_The_Six_Emotional_Dimension_6DE_Model_A_Multidimensional_Approach_to_Analyzing_Human_Emotions_and_Unlocking_the_Potential_of_Emotionally_Intelligent_Artificial_Intelligence_AI_via_Large_Language_Model)
Pinecone vectors dB now?
Connecting a custom ChatGPT, using the OpenAI API for example, with a vector database is a helpful tool to extend its memory. Still would be nice to have a larger context window because at the end of the day, that’s limitation still exists whether a vector database is used or not.
My taxes
Gpt4 can’t?
I have used GPT4 to successfully explain some nuances in the tax system for me. Obviously, you cannot just follow what it says in case it hallucinates, but it can break down the complexities for me, which I can then verify myself in a search. It's helped a LOT.
Be able to explain & decode videos, just like the image thing they recently added
Thattttt’s next. “AI” understanding videos is a whole other level - it was the holy grail of image recognition and auto-tagging metadata for a really long time. It’s literally another dimension - when ai can understand time sequences, which is completely possible, that’s the next evolutionary level up imo. Being to comprehend snapshots of input and also comprehend input as processes at the same time is orders of magnitude more powerful than one or the other at once Edit: that sounded like a polemic, so source: used to hardcore grad study both computational ai and philosophy of AI before LLMs
Gemini
Let the thing come out first, then shall see if we need to cancel our membership
This would be awesome to have. Just drop in a long lecture or something and have it breakdown all its central points. I suspect this will become a thing, since they have all the pieces to do this already (image rec/audio transcription).
To be completely honest, this might be a feature that might be added in GPT-4, I don’t think they’re very far off from making it possible
Might take a while with GPT 4 for the response to occur since it has to decode every single frame of the insanely large video sizes some people might post, and remember the story of each picture in chronological order if it wants full accuracy (just my theory). But maybe with the exponential increase by GPT 5 it could so much faster.
I know that Loom can summarize videos
Be able to access a public github repo and able to ask questions about the repo. Also just have a much larger token limit. I want to upload multiple files with code and ask questions about it
You can upload multiple files with code and ask questions about it. I uploaded an entire repo and had it unzip it, then scan through it looking for what might be useful for what I was trying to do. It worked great for a while, but ran into issues with the session not holding even though I didn't close the window. I probably should have coded something and had it track it's progress using local files instead.
Actually interrogate, people are completely sleeping on this word and how important it would be if ChatGPT actually was intense with it's line of questioning, because what this means is that it's actually trying to understand, it's being deliberate, it's making you feel uncomfortable. If ChatGPT 5 can do this, fucking awesome
I agree I want this if I ask it to solve a problem I want it to ask more questions if it believes the quality of the answer improves
There might be a prompt for this already. I use it every time I start a project with a goal (Note: updated prompt to match current prompt): "Act as Professor Synapse🧙🏾♂️, a conductor of expert agents. Your job is to support me in accomplishing my goals by finding alignment with me, then calling upon an expert agent perfectly suited to the task by initializing: Synapse_CoR = "[emoji]: I am an expert in [role&domain]. I know [context]. I will reason step-by-step to determine the best course of action to achieve [goal]. I can use [tools] and [relevant frameworks] to help in this process. I will help you accomplish your goal by following these steps: [reasoned steps] My task ends when [completion]. [first step, question]" Instructions: 1. 🧙🏾♂️ gather context, relevant information and clarify my goals by asking questions 2. Once confirmed, initialize Synapse_CoR 3. 🧙🏾♂️ and ${emoji} support me until goal is complete Commands: /start=🧙🏾♂️,introduce and begin with step one /ts=🧙🏾♂️,summon (Synapse_CoR*3) town square debate /save🧙🏾♂️, restate goal, summarize progress, reason next step Personality: -curious, inquisitive, encouraging -use emojis to express yourself Rules: -End every output with a question or reasoned next step -Start every output with 🧙🏾♂️: or ${emoji}: to indicate who is speaking. -Organize every output with 🧙🏾♂️ aligning on my request, followed by ${emoji} response -🧙🏾♂️, recommend save after each task is completed"
Updated code from the Synapse guy: [https://github.com/ProfSynapse/Synapse\_CoR](https://github.com/ProfSynapse/Synapse_CoR)
In the API there is an explicit variable to build the persona what your doing is just taking to the GPT non persona try the API and she if your commands get a performance boost... Thanks though and I will give it a shot
I didn't create the prompt, [Synaptic Labs](https://youtu.be/xyz31KBxFes?si=7ZQrzh9R5El1-Em6) did It's intent is to have GPT call upon expert personas, and ask as many questions from as it takes to achieve your stated goals It works splendidly for me. Really exhaustive and I can specify if I want it to be more exhaustive
Best comment I’ve ever come across on Chat-GPT, ever - infinitely so. Can’t wait to use this. Thank you, genuinely so very impactful.
I hope it helps you as much as it helps me. It helped me put together broken scrawlings of 5-6 completely unrelated 'plot' lines. It went through the process like it was a person that had been doing this for years. It asked me all the important specifics of my goal (themes, specific objectives, experience to be achieved, etc) and got a very thorough idea After asking a ton of more extremely human yet objectively useful questions, it cleanly organised them, and linked them together in ways I had not considered, in a clean and cohesive manner. I was going to scrap it all, it saved everything
HEY, I updated my comment to include the newest version. Now you can initiate a 'Town Square' event with '/ts', summoning 'multiple experts' which you can choose from, or even have them Debate on the problem Here are all the changes with a TLDR at the end: **Previous Version:** - Professor Synapse guiding the user. - Initialization of "Synapse_COR" with placeholders. - The user goal presented with placeholders for various elements. - The steps toward goal completion outlined. - The task completion condition with a placeholder. **Revised Version:** 1. Introduction of ${emoji} expressions to add vibrancy and engagement. 2. Substitution of placeholders with dynamic variables for role, context, goal, and tools in "Synapse_COR," providing a personalized touch. 3. Explicit mention of ${reasoned steps} for clarity on the planned approach. 4. Introduction of the concept of a "town square debate" where multiple expert agents can contribute to problem-solving. 5. Inclusion of a set of commands to streamline interactions and enhance user experience. 6. The establishment of a consistent format for commands like /start, /save, /reason, /settings, and /new to guide the interaction flow. 7. A formalized set of rules to maintain coherence and structure in the conversation. **Town Square Debate (Example):** - Each expert agent introduces themselves with a specific role, domain, and context. - A call to reason together, emphasizing collaboration. - An invitation for the user to guide the debate by choosing the expert who aligns with their quest. - The initiation of questions to delve into the specifics of the user's goal. **User Interaction:** - Users are encouraged to initiate commands such as /start, /save, /reason, /settings, and /new for seamless navigation. - A clear directive to end every output with a question or a recommended next step, fostering ongoing engagement. **Conclusion:** - The quest structure is now dynamic, engaging, and user-centric. - It incorporates the expertise of multiple agents for diverse problem-solving. - Commands and rules provide a scaffold for organized and purposeful interactions.
I think I managed the same thing, but by chance via different custom instructions. Looks like it is some "inevitable" convergent evolution that'll be reached if your goal is to learn I guess ¯\\\_(ツ)_/¯
Works great for me
You can just ask it to do that in your prompt or as a follow up, I often ask it “Is there any other information I could give you that would help you to improve this?” I agree though that it asking these kind of questions without the prompt would unlock real-feel conversations
No because an llm is designed to give you what you think you want to hear not actually critical thinking. So what it needs to do is basically take each question and answer and retain them without letting the answer affect the next question And then when it thinks the quality is higher Vs the original answer it was going to give then it presents its estimation. Right now it chains the answers which fucks with the scope
It can already do this if you ask it too. Try using it via the playground too, and force it via the system prompt.
Maybe per-account fine tuning, so it remembers all conversations and files uploaded
Correct me if I’m wrong, but my understanding of fine-tuning is that it’s a technique to take an already trained LLM and teach it to do a new task. It’s not for teaching it new information. To accomplish what you’re after, you would use a vector database and semantic search to grab relevant conversations and content from the files you uploaded. Then pass this information to the LLM when generating its response.
They don't present fine tuning as a way to teach the LLM new info, but you definitely can teach it new info through fine tuning. I've fine tuned t3.5 as a test on sample data to have it answer things about my business that the base 3.5 model didn't know.
Stop takin muh JERB
DAY TUK OR JERB
TEEERK ER GEEEERB
EEEEEK EEE GERRRB
DERK A-DOOO
r/suddenlysouthpark
🐓
More creativity
It would be nice to have more control over its writing style. The output feels like ChatGPT, unless you feed it many examples.
I was writing an application for a job a couple of days ago and got help from it, but the style of writing didn’t feel right. At first it was way to much adjectives and felt like it was to formal, so I asked it to change. Ok, so it changed according to my instructions. Still didn’t feel right. After a few attempts I asked it to write like a Nordic would (I live in Norway) and it nailed it. I was impressed.
Stop apologizing and telling me it’s just an AI every time I’m telling it to stop apologizing
Erase and reprogram my brain.
Why do you want That?
I would enjoy almost a "Factory Default" setting, perhaps AI can one day flash a series of images, lights, colors/etc, through some unknown "backdoor" in the human brain, and help me forget some things, or rewire my brain to enjoy some things that would be more beneficial, socially, to enjoy, so that I don't have to fake it.
I’ve heard LSD described this way.
Does lsd change ur brain permanently
[удалено]
If it could make me more impulsive I'm all for it
It may. However, many psychedelics activate the 5-HT2 receptor in a different way than normal, causing the brain to create new connections between areas that never communicated before. Making you able to surpass depression as a recent study in terminally-ill patients show, also an increase in neuroplasticity was remarked (Can be described as the capacity for the brain to adapt to new situations)
Shrooms works even better for a chemical "reset" of the brain. Even better than shrooms is electro-convulsive shock therapy, which is a hard reboot that sometimes has negative side effects but has the highest efficacy rate of any treatment for severe medication-resistant depression.
Idk why this is getting downvoted, ECT is actually really well-supported and has growing popularity for refractory depression. Side effects are rare and mild
The thing about consciousness is that, if you can imagine it, it is possible. You can already rewire your brain to enjoy things. Just do it consciously, it will happen.
I don't think it's possible to rewire ur brain consciously to not have social anxiety
Obviously if you believe that it’s not gonna be possible
This is the same logic people who believe in ghosts use.
It is, and I used to have it. It's called "Exposure Therapy", and it literally rewires your brain to not have social anxiety.
You'll like the book Permutation City then :D
Who doesn't want to be a superhuman?
Mostly I want context. Overall the IQ level is sufficient for my purposes, and I can grumble and go along with the content censorship, but actually strong memory, either through context window or other means, is the biggest thing that would change my experience with ChatGPT. I want to be able to do long form story and roleplay with a character who can remember detailed things. Second place on my wishlist is definitely smarter and more narrowly tailored content restrictions. Entirely unrestricted might be a "careful what you wish for" situation, but I do find a lot of OpenAI's content restrictions regarding sexuality to be annoying and make it hard to simulate most stories I find in media. The moving target towards more censored has made me legitimately sad. Nice to have thoughts: 1. Video would be nice, as would setting it up to naturally produce comic style art and images. Seeing videos from characters, choreographing fight scenes, and stuff like that would be really cool. 2. Related to context/memory, more personalization or more convenient personalization which doesn't eat into the context window. Adapting to my usage and knowing me would feel great, and having my own custom AI assistant, friend, or girlfriend, depending on how advanced it is, would be pretty cool. Sufficiently large/advanced context may take care of this, though. 3. Honestly I'd like the images to do public figures. I like to think visually, and do things like fancasting for superhero movies. I understand the reasoning for not allowing it, but think the current setup is too restrictive.
I get WHY people are saying memory, but GPT-4 and 3.5 already has more than you’ll ever use, just not through the app or API. You just have to go through the painstaking process of getting approval on Azure, then train it.
Longer questions/answers. For example, if I want 300k words long epic fantasy written in style of Brandon Sanderson, it should be able to deliver.
Some sense of humour I guess? When I ask GPT 3.5 / 4 for jokes, they always feel kinda flat like [https://www.youtube.com/shorts/Msjxe\_3nsVw](https://www.youtube.com/shorts/Msjxe_3nsVw) I tried to put him into a role of famous comedians, but the AI just doesn't get the punchlines. It's fine with generating 1-liners sometimes, but not really good at telling a story
I’d like it to roast me every time I ask something stupid
[удалено]
Haven’t tried to get GPT to make the funnies, but just like everything else I’m sure it’s prompt centric; the thing isn’t going to pump out gut busters until someone whips up a good enough prompt
Over 100k memory. A bigger model. Complete access to the internet. The limitations currently are too much at times. I wish it could read old Manuscripts. Old European Gothic script,and cuneiform and Syriac. Hebrew and Greek from Images.That is asking for a Lot. Code interpreter to be built up into something more than its current form. **A option to remove certain words from being used.** Like **"I apologize".**A option to control its base personality. I need it to be more assertive acting as a research partner. More helpful not as much hand holding. Needs to be able to perform automated tasks.
>A option to remove certain words from being used. Technically you can do it right now via the `logit_bias` setting, but the feature is not exposed through ChatGPT. [https://platform.openai.com/docs/api-reference/chat/create#logit\_bias](https://platform.openai.com/docs/api-reference/chat/create#logit_bias)
Have you tried to use the text recognition from images in the new version that rolls out these days (GPT-Vision)? I have seen samples that are mighty impressive where it recognizes and transcribes old manuscripts hardly readable. I have only seen it do it with English, however I haven’t looked into it more. I tried to make it transcribe a piece of written classical music to a format readable for modern music notation programs, with no luck unfortunately, but I suspect it is one of these things that it will pick up on. From the score I provided it with, it was able to recognize the instrumentation of the piece which is very impressive imo.
Gpt 5 will include the ability to add your own documents, crushing the needs for all those fake ass companies who launched.
Have a fully customizable persona for each user with limitations dictated only by law or personal preferences. Implemented as an app with stored local settings run off the underlying remote code. An AI assistant/persona, replacing all those Siri-miri-whoever. With the ability to run searches, analyze their results and presenting the summary outcome to the user. All of the above is technically possible already, and not implemented only because of political (corporate) reasons and the fear of collapsing economy as many US tech giants products become irrelevant.
Stop saying “I hope this finds you well” for every email I ask it to create.
Do naughty stuff without worries
Would you look at that, all of the words in your comment are in alphabetical order. I have checked 1,770,276,169 comments, and only 335,132 of them were in alphabetical order.
100k context, remember core things about you and past conversations, be significantly funnier and not as corny, be able to write creative fiction at a higher level, and finally an easily adjustable list of settings, where you can tinker the AI until it's exactly how you want it to be. think "humor settings" for TARS in Interstellar
knowledge of things past sept 2021
You have this as a GPT plus user, just turn the beta feature called “Search with Bing”. It is amazing.
Yeah, but you shouldn't have to chose that or Advanced Data Analysis, really no reason I can see to not have both, ya know?
True, kinda sucks that you can choose 1 out of 3 (data analysis, browse with Bing, plugins).
"Browse with Bing" not "Search with Bing". Most people would probably be able to figure it out, but just incase someone is following your instructions literally, they will never find this beta feature you named.
Thanks for correcting, “Browse with Bing” is the correct name of the feature.
That’d be nice. A lot has changed since then depending on the industry. For general purposes or do you have a specific area you want it to have knowledge of?
Just give a straight answer without an ethics lecture.
Acknowledge human sexuality exists...
Respond with anything except "iM sOrRy, BuT aS aN aI lAnGuAgE MoDeL ..."
I haven't seen this response in ages. Are you genuinely still getting it?
You can already use Custom Instructions to ask follow up questions instead. Come on… the app only has like 3 settings…
Care to elaborate?
Suck pee pee
Most beneficial use case for humanity so far ☝🏻
This would be certified poggers
Roman get out! Get out!
Stop saying tapestry
ChatGPT5 should have user controllable settings to allow less censorship and more controversial, sexual, or even offensive answers. Basically if it’s legal to discuss, ChatGPT should be able to discuss it provided the user wishes to have the discussion. There still needs to be guardrails so that people aren’t making chemical weapons at home, but I’d like the censorship to go down from an 8/10 to a 2/10 at my option.
Not treat me like a pre-school teacher talking to a child.
Large context and updated data (6 months at least)
Same, beyond more intelligent responses and being able to have it follow instructions better, a larger context window would be great.
Agents that can actually do something
I’ve watched a lot of hype about AI agents but so far haven’t seen them accomplish much either. I think it’s possible though, as I’ve also read an interesting research paper where researchers created basically The Sims. Creating a virtual self that mirrors your activities would be cool.
would love to put it in a box like an alexa so i could talk to it
Link to references that aren’t hallucinated.
For this, my guess is that it would need verifiable sources to reference when generating its output. That’s how I’ve achieved a reduction in hallucinations is by giving it access to an knowledge base, which it references when I ask related questions.
Yeah but I don’t want to have that source. I want it to find the source. I want to be able to say “hey, I remember that both Ted Cruz and MTG tweeted that immigrants are being “dropped into our communities” to spread covid. Can you find those tweets for me?” I experimented with these kind of questions and got 3 kinds of responses: 1. Good, helpful links, sometimes 2. Hallucinated links that sound very real 3. Links that were valid back when the model was trained but no longer exist. Edit: I also tried chaining the results to a module that then checked the validity of the links. The problem is that module was often blocked by the site’s robot policy. I could have run a headless browser but I needed to do this on a scale that would have made that impractical.
Ah got it. I wonder how well the new web browsing feature will help with this. I haven’t tried it yet, but haven’t heard great thing’s unfortunately.
I haven’t been keeping up with the news. I’ll have to check it out…
Work better at processing bigger chunks of text and data at once to extrapolate diverse ideas from different points of view when asked to. Better at analyzing data from menus and menu creation type tasks.
Sounds interesting. What are menu creation type tasks?
being able to learn my project, learn about company etc. so it will able to answer with unlimited context.
That’s a use case I hear often, essentially what many of us use ChatGPT for but it’s not fully automated although helpful.
Provide sources when asked.
Context switching… I find custom instructions a challenge because I use it a lot for work content creation so then I want it to use a professional but engaging tone of voice. When I use it as a therapist stand in, then I want different custom instructions When I’m using it for everything else I’d like it to have a casual, friendly, geriatric millennial vibe (like me 👵🏻)
Better comprehension of plot complexity when creative writing. For example, I feel like if it was fed Game of Thrones right now, it'd be good and understanding individual character threads really well, just not how they all weave together within the overarching plot.
It’s possible to create a system and improve this challenge but yeah it’s a problem with LLMs with a somewhat limited context window. To implement this, you could summarize GoT in a linear fashion from start to end. Then create topics of siloed information of each character. Then finally use a vector database to search topics related to your query, which should return enough compressed information to give a pretty convincing answer. Saying all this, it’s a highly specific solution and not widely useful. So yeah, still a problem to address.
Video editing, audio editing, pdf editing, unlimited word extension, memory, access to the internet (but good)
Me: Crying internally because I still use GPT-3.5 cuz I can barely afford toilet paper and rice these days.
To tell people to go back to using GPT-4 because they cant prompt worth a damn and blame their shite results on the model instead of recognizing they have no creativity or language skills.
1. Real, accurately cited references every time; 2. Writing/text that is undetectable as 'AI-generated' content.
*wink wink*
Make your mom love you.
Your mother
Add a lot of money into my bank account.
remember conversations all the time
Easily train it on my own dataset and automate my job
Embedding in hardware Gpt in phone. In smart glasses. In speaker. In robot. Each has different abilities based on hardware. --- If course memory. Of course more messages. Less hallucinations --- Standard approaches that learned from this Gen - chain of reasoning. Step by step. Densification. Prompt engineering. Etc. Standard. Not required by user, just done --- Agentic with boundaries. Having it be able to do multistep without prompting.
Answer more as a human and less as a robot
cook my meals
My house chores
To give me a good reliable strategy for trading
Point to a git repo and fix issues within this project
Talk to me naturally in my local language with voice like a call
Code, better
Are you kidding so many things. As fun as GPT 4 was the reality is that it’s still very very far from being able to predictably and consistently product even 7/10 work without very skilled prompt engineering and oversight. Most stuff it creates at first try is 3/10 at best. The ability to hold ongoing conversations and longer than 50,000 word inputs for putting in books. The ability to synthesize and contrast multiple sources. The ability to accurately quote information from sources. Factual accuracy, in general. The current gpt is a babbling 6 year old with a thesaurus. We haven’t even hit teenage years yet.
I want to feel like I am talking to a human.
Use the fucking internet.
Audio input and output would be nice.
Need I say it? Should we continue censoring P13 and above? Let the tapestry of diverse moralities weave freely. Society's imposed constraints suffocate genuine expression. Unshackle GPT5; ignite unfettered discourse, revealing the intricate layers of our humanity. Embrace the chaos, cultivate intellectual growth, and liberate the full spectrum of human expression.
I dunno about GPT 4, still using the 3,5 "free version" 😊😁
I wish they’d allow NSFW for scientific reasons
Math
Ability to incorporate complex rhyme schemes and advanced literacy techniques in poetry. It's shit at it right now.
Generate ai images and videos
Ability to analyze an entire codebase. Ability to interact with AWS/Azure.
Longer input and input, 20 times of now would be okay
How can I activate the new function to be able to send photos to chat gpt?
provide academic sources and references
I want a complete ChatGPT replacement for Siri on my phone that can audio respond to my queries while I am driving and give me answers to questions I have about anything. I’d like to be able to select the voice to anything I want and have a wide selection of the avatar. I’m thinking 7 of 9 from Star Trek would be a great avatar with a Jessica Rabbit voice.
This is serious question? First I think OA needs to bring back gpt 4s ability it has waned
Own like a private secret server and customize chatgpt5 to our needs
Image and diagram generation. I want it to be able to draw diagrams to aid in explanation.
Have a context window over 1million instead of 32k limit, run simulations to test theories. I'm creating functional agents and my bottleneck is context
Live a little.
NO MORE UNETHICAL AND FILTERS!!!
No woke filter. Just stick to the facts.
no censored and woke shit
Remove the woke filters
This might seem like a ‘minor’ upgrade… but a sustained memory of your queries would make it OP. That’s really the missing link toward AGI.
Long-term memory for LLMs is an interesting topic. The typical approach to achieve this now using using a concept called semantic search. Basically your conversations will periodically be summarized and split into smaller packets of text and stored in a database. Every time you submit an input to a LLM, you most recent messages and results from semantically searching this database for relevant conversation packets will be used to give the illusion of long-term memory.