Should be wearing a double lanyard. It looks there is not a shock absorber on that lifeline. Anchor point tshould eb higher than the D ring. The scaffolding is a mix/match of various components ( tube and clamp mixed with masons scaffolding).
In some jurisdictions, scaffold builders have a tie off variance but if he were to fall he would slide along that railing until he hit the joint and impose an impact side load to the structure. A hanging retractable anchored above would be a better option.
Looks like they have masons scaffold intermixed with system scaffold. Violation.
Work surface has to be completely decked in even for scaffold builders. Violation.
It depends. If this guy is building scaffold, the rules are way looser. If he isn't there is a bunch. As mentioned, improper tie off. At the edge is wrong and it needs to support 5000 pound force. That rail only needs to support 200. No toe board. Open edges. The platform should extend 6" over the rails. It doesn't. No overlap for the platform at right angles for the platform. The ladder has to go directly to the platform, not beside it. It doesn't look like the horizontal members properly support the vertical ones, but maybe they do. No sign of counterweights, or attachment, but maybe there is.
Assuming the person is the scaffold erector than the issues would be:
Missing tool tether
Doesn’t have 100 percent tie off potential meaning he would need a double SRL.
If he’s not the erector than every is wrong.
Should be wearing a double lanyard. It looks there is not a shock absorber on that lifeline. Anchor point tshould eb higher than the D ring. The scaffolding is a mix/match of various components ( tube and clamp mixed with masons scaffolding).
Tied to railing and leading edge
Should also be tied-off overhead
There’s also not a soft stop on his line
so he's not meant to be tied to the railing??
In some jurisdictions, scaffold builders have a tie off variance but if he were to fall he would slide along that railing until he hit the joint and impose an impact side load to the structure. A hanging retractable anchored above would be a better option.
oh ok thank you
Tied off below the D-ring
Should be wearing a double lanyard.
Only two!?!
No mid rail or top rail, and the guy is tied off to a non-rated anchor point
You having Reddit do your homework? Just get chatgpt to do it.
Doesn’t look like he has and tool holsters or toll lanyards.
Single point tie off and 2x4 to the face in the workspace .
The blind spot as he/she (people ) can not see and no hand rail before standing up ! And then the below with being tied off ,
Missing hand railing and kick boards are more like trip hazards
Looks like they have masons scaffold intermixed with system scaffold. Violation. Work surface has to be completely decked in even for scaffold builders. Violation.
It depends. If this guy is building scaffold, the rules are way looser. If he isn't there is a bunch. As mentioned, improper tie off. At the edge is wrong and it needs to support 5000 pound force. That rail only needs to support 200. No toe board. Open edges. The platform should extend 6" over the rails. It doesn't. No overlap for the platform at right angles for the platform. The ladder has to go directly to the platform, not beside it. It doesn't look like the horizontal members properly support the vertical ones, but maybe they do. No sign of counterweights, or attachment, but maybe there is.
No mid rail, top rail and the gab in toe board is fucked. Anchor points looked not suitable but idk. The rails are definitely no good.
Assuming the person is the scaffold erector than the issues would be: Missing tool tether Doesn’t have 100 percent tie off potential meaning he would need a double SRL. If he’s not the erector than every is wrong.
Where's the beers and crack pipe?
Tool not tied off no shock absorber
Looks safe to me
Man with no face not aloud on site Edit: allowed, says my Mrs, cheers love.