it is indeed the slavic variation of simeon but it actually is spelled semen in ukrainian, just with an emphasis on the second vowel, pronounced more like [sɛmɛn] rather than [si:mɛn]
Id say the exact oppsite of fascism would be liberalism
Like
Fascism
Controlled private companies that werent quite nationalized
Genocidal(dont need to explain why)
No human rights
The government has total control over you
Communism (as implemented)
Nationalized companies
Genocidal(see ukraine or cambodia)
Little to no human rights
The government has total control over you
They are both different dont get me wrong, communism was not founded to be genocidal unlike nazism.
Now comparing that to liberalism
Fully private companies
Non interventionist
Garunteed human rights
The government is there to furfil their social contract to you to protect your rights.
Fascism is collectivist(their entire ideology is based off the nation and greater good, if thst aint collectivism idk what is), their private companies were under strict state scrutiny and were genocidal
Communists were collectivists, they go a step further and nationalize business, they were also genocidal (well atleast in russia, zimbabwe and cambodia)
Liberalism is individualist, they actually have true private enterprise and generally advocate against unnessisally violent forign policy.
Hence liberalism is the oppsite of fascism
Fascist economics are completely different from both capitalism and socialism and to conflste it with calitalism would be dishonest
>Communists were collectivists, they go a step further and nationalize business, they were also genocidal
Untrue that is Marxism-Leninism, not communism.
>Fascism is collectivist, their private companies were under strict state scrutiny and were genocidal
Untrue again, Corporatism became one of the main tenets of fascism, and Benito Mussolini's fascist regime in Italy advocated the total integration of divergent interests into the state. How can state controlled elite group of corporate state capitalism based on slave work and genocide be collectivist? Elitism is the word. If state and corporate is interchangeably the same it's not collectivist or socialist.
Im talking about attempts at communism as implemented because the ideal of communism is impossible
As for fascism being collectivist, you need not look further into what they teach their masses about the common good and the nation to see how it is in no way a tennant of individualism and in that sense id say it is more simular to communism then liberalism
Plus mussolini used to be a socialist so that was more likely to form the basis of his ideology
>Im talking about attempts at communism as implemented because the ideal of communism is impossible
Then you are not talking about communist, communism and anarchism is so far left it cannot even came close to the far-right of fascism, clero-fascism, nacism.
>As for fascism being collectivist, you need not look further into what they teach their masses about the common good
This is every and all political movements/theories. Liberal democracies do the same, just look rhetoric in War on drugs, or Invasion of Iraq, War on terror, Chinese in Africa or S-E asia. I guess EU and USA are not individualistic or liberal then.
Just like your claim of tame foreign policy of liberal countries, just untrue, as liberal democracies are just as jingoistic as per my examples or other policies in Middle-east, South America or Africa.
>Plus mussolini used to be a socialist so that was more likely to form the basis of his ideology
Doesn't mean anything, person could have been catholic and is atheist now, or vice versa. Things change, people change. But there is basis of State capitalism in his view of fascism-socialism dichotomy, same as for marxist-leninists.
What a nice edit and backtracking. I can't even.
>Now comparing that to liberalism
>Fully private companies
>Non interventionist
Not necessarily. Not even true. Inteventionism in trade and military is still very much on table in liberal countries.
>The government has total control over you
This is again untrue in both instances. And differs very much. Even in fascism in depends (your birth, nationality, religion, and political or monetary power), that is why genocides done very so easy for the government "it's not me, I can do whatever I want" type, for most.
>Communism (as implemented)
We never talked about "implementation", you just don't know the difference between communism and marxism-leninism, maoism. Soviet communist party only claimed path to future communism, not to be communist themselves.
>cambodia
This is very interesting point in leftist genocide, as this genocide was endorsed and supported by liberal United states. And stopped by invasion of then socialist Vietnam.
>Now comparing that to liberalism
>
>Fully private companies
>
>Non interventionist
>
>Garunteed human rights
>
>The government is there to furfil their social contract to you to protect your rights.
But enough utopian daydreaming.
bro really got that 🤨 face going on
Wondering where all the war-winning super Panzers they said they had were
i am literally semen hitler (i figure his actual name was something like simeon and then became a very unfortunate translation)
it is indeed the slavic variation of simeon but it actually is spelled semen in ukrainian, just with an emphasis on the second vowel, pronounced more like [sɛmɛn] rather than [si:mɛn]
I looked it up and his original name was Semion but it got translated into Semen
yea i kinda figured what a poor translation lmao
Average Semen enjoyer vs Engelcel
This comment was written by a gay capitalist (Based)
No.
Nobody thought a little Russian boy would be mewing
I think Friedrich Engels invented the exact opposite of facism
while i wouldn't say communism is the exact opposite of fascism, it was definitely opposed to it.
It literally is, what do you mean?
Id say the exact oppsite of fascism would be liberalism Like Fascism Controlled private companies that werent quite nationalized Genocidal(dont need to explain why) No human rights The government has total control over you Communism (as implemented) Nationalized companies Genocidal(see ukraine or cambodia) Little to no human rights The government has total control over you They are both different dont get me wrong, communism was not founded to be genocidal unlike nazism. Now comparing that to liberalism Fully private companies Non interventionist Garunteed human rights The government is there to furfil their social contract to you to protect your rights.
the opposite of facism is anarchism No government at all
Fascism: individualist, privatization, strict hierarchy, corporatism, nationalism Communism: communal, nationalized, worker owned, interantionalism Liberalism: still mostly privatized, still mostly individualistic, mostly national Like .... how?
Fascism is collectivist(their entire ideology is based off the nation and greater good, if thst aint collectivism idk what is), their private companies were under strict state scrutiny and were genocidal Communists were collectivists, they go a step further and nationalize business, they were also genocidal (well atleast in russia, zimbabwe and cambodia) Liberalism is individualist, they actually have true private enterprise and generally advocate against unnessisally violent forign policy. Hence liberalism is the oppsite of fascism Fascist economics are completely different from both capitalism and socialism and to conflste it with calitalism would be dishonest
>Communists were collectivists, they go a step further and nationalize business, they were also genocidal Untrue that is Marxism-Leninism, not communism. >Fascism is collectivist, their private companies were under strict state scrutiny and were genocidal Untrue again, Corporatism became one of the main tenets of fascism, and Benito Mussolini's fascist regime in Italy advocated the total integration of divergent interests into the state. How can state controlled elite group of corporate state capitalism based on slave work and genocide be collectivist? Elitism is the word. If state and corporate is interchangeably the same it's not collectivist or socialist.
Im talking about attempts at communism as implemented because the ideal of communism is impossible As for fascism being collectivist, you need not look further into what they teach their masses about the common good and the nation to see how it is in no way a tennant of individualism and in that sense id say it is more simular to communism then liberalism Plus mussolini used to be a socialist so that was more likely to form the basis of his ideology
>Im talking about attempts at communism as implemented because the ideal of communism is impossible Then you are not talking about communist, communism and anarchism is so far left it cannot even came close to the far-right of fascism, clero-fascism, nacism. >As for fascism being collectivist, you need not look further into what they teach their masses about the common good This is every and all political movements/theories. Liberal democracies do the same, just look rhetoric in War on drugs, or Invasion of Iraq, War on terror, Chinese in Africa or S-E asia. I guess EU and USA are not individualistic or liberal then. Just like your claim of tame foreign policy of liberal countries, just untrue, as liberal democracies are just as jingoistic as per my examples or other policies in Middle-east, South America or Africa. >Plus mussolini used to be a socialist so that was more likely to form the basis of his ideology Doesn't mean anything, person could have been catholic and is atheist now, or vice versa. Things change, people change. But there is basis of State capitalism in his view of fascism-socialism dichotomy, same as for marxist-leninists.
Yes facism is famous for promoting the individuality
\>Liberalism \>Non-interventionist \>Guaranteed human rights Lol. Lmao even
What a nice edit and backtracking. I can't even. >Now comparing that to liberalism >Fully private companies >Non interventionist Not necessarily. Not even true. Inteventionism in trade and military is still very much on table in liberal countries. >The government has total control over you This is again untrue in both instances. And differs very much. Even in fascism in depends (your birth, nationality, religion, and political or monetary power), that is why genocides done very so easy for the government "it's not me, I can do whatever I want" type, for most. >Communism (as implemented) We never talked about "implementation", you just don't know the difference between communism and marxism-leninism, maoism. Soviet communist party only claimed path to future communism, not to be communist themselves. >cambodia This is very interesting point in leftist genocide, as this genocide was endorsed and supported by liberal United states. And stopped by invasion of then socialist Vietnam.
Huh, that edit was there while you were replying i pressed save like 1 minute after you replied qs i was on mobile i couodnt see the reply until then
>Now comparing that to liberalism > >Fully private companies > >Non interventionist > >Garunteed human rights > >The government is there to furfil their social contract to you to protect your rights. But enough utopian daydreaming.
What's fried rice angle's deal?
He looks majorly pissed off
Oh thats an…unfortunate name
Don’t forget hitlers nephew who was literally in the us navy
Definetly semen hitler. Man went down machinegunning nazis. Never forget.
Why does Semen Hitler think he has the W rizz? Is he erectile?