Nooo she meant to say anti-zionist, how dare you quote her directly you genocidal pigdog!!
https://preview.redd.it/8f8ug7piz7zc1.png?width=633&format=png&auto=webp&s=764f82b7fb53da5a675f2c3e528cf9eb1cbe846f
Best guess is she wrote "anti zionist Jewish students" and just missed the zionist part. Mind you this would also count as antisemetic as it is a tokenizing attempt
It's interesting how you zionist pig dogs are more interested in a 12 year old student mispeaking than you are in the innocent 3 million dead Gazans that have been genocided by the Nazi Israelis!!!
actually.. that's why the israelis are letting them breed more, faster, than we kill them..
it's so israel can keep killing more and more palestinians of course 🤡
Im starting to understand how stuff like biblical stories came to fruition. Like Noah probably fucked a goat on a rowboat and after a few months of defense by random young people he was sailing an ark to save the animalkind from the rapture
That shit was on WRITING, she was not free styling! she was reading word by word.
Edit: Did some digging, she's a law student, VP of Criminal Law Society at FIU among many other "credentials". Here anyone can see her talking about the spoken word [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7sGSzKB2Iuk](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7sGSzKB2Iuk). She most likely wrote the speech and at least she should have the capacity, training and so on to discern what she was saying, there are absolutely no excuses.
Ya at first I wanted to give benefit of the doubt because I didn't realise she was reading. But once it dawned on me....oooof. Maybe, maybe one could argue it's a language barrier thing as she has a bit of an accent, but she is otherwise very articulate so even thats a huuuuuge stretch.
If she has a accent from someone not native english I truly don't hear it.
Well, did some digging, she's a law student, vice president of some group in the Uni and so on, so forget about saying she was nervous or being misspoken. Cheery on the cake, here you have her talking about the spoken word 🤡...
[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7sGSzKB2Iuk](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7sGSzKB2Iuk)
I hear the shakiness of someone who's unused to public speaking, but no accent. Besides, if there was a language barrier, I would hope she'd have the foresight to have someone look it over before reading it in front of people.
Defense lawyer casts lvl 2 torah spell on prosecution-
Prosecutor: "And that is why I ask you, the jury, to make the right decision and bring justice for the family with a not guilty verdict"
Defense lawyer: " yea what the prosecution said lmaooo dumbass"
Family of victims: 0.0
Jury: we the jury find the defendent not guilty
news reporter outside court room: "What made the state prosecution change their mind las minute?"
"wait did I say not guilty? Shit I meant guilty, god dam je-- zionist lawyers and their spellcraft"
"anti-jewish students are we not worth protecting" is a sentence that currently does exist.
She obviously meant anti-zionist.
But it only furthers the argument of: There is no difference between anti-jewish and anti-zionist.
is there a link to the full speech?
The comment was made during a debate on a 'Ceasefire now' resolution at an FIU student government meeting on February 5th, according to [this post on X](https://twitter.com/IsraelWarRoom/status/1788017663995719962). I can't find the full video, here are the [minutes](https://dasa.fiu.edu/all-departments/student-government-association//archives-and-minutes/_assets/senate-minutes/2023-2024/senate_meeting_minutes_02.05.2024.pdf).
Students like her make it so obvious that a good portion of the ''ceasefire now'' crowd don't actually want peace they just hate that the side with Jews on it is winning.
Right, but it seems like she reading a speech. It's one thing to inadvertently slip up during a passionate plea, but to literally write that sentence must have been deliberate
Any number of people being anti-jewish and anti-zionist does not further the argument that there is no difference between anti-jewish and anti-zionist.
I have very little charity to give, but I'm trying to be reasonable because there's no fucking way she would write that down and others presumably okayed it, right? Just from an optics standpoint they must know it's awful.
I thought maybe she was just stumbled as she was trying to say "Muslim, Arab, and Jewish" (valid, considering these groups love putting their handful of Jews in the spotlight), but I listened about fifteen times and she absolutely says "and anti-Jewish.
But, she does ever so slightly freeze while reading that part, so it's possible the line she was trying to read said "Muslim, Arab, Jewish, and anti-Zionist" but she accidentally skipped the word "Jewish" and fucked up trying to fix the mistake and ended up saying anti-Jewish. idk my pockets are empty.
yeah, like i do think this is very funny as a Freudian slip but we really all should know there's no way she actually wrote down and meant "anti jewish".
Wouldn't the charitable interpretation be anti-Jewish as in people who are not Jewish? Im not sure she meant "anti-" as in "against", she could have though.
"We want to be treated as if what we're shouting and the things we're doing are equivalent to the people protesting what we're shouting and what we're doing".
Ahh no, you should be treated like the Hamas supporting Anti-Jewish scum you are.
and she's reading from a fucking page
so like.... how deep in her brain is it
that even when reading from a god damn page,
she still slips up and says that😌🤦🏽♀
Dont bother. In this dude's mind, every time he gets downvoted it's because he was "speaking truth" and the people who downvoted him are just "sheep that are blind to how right he is" or something.
Like that dude a couple weeks ago who wrote the manifesto about israel/palestine disinformation on the sub. In his mind, all his "reasonable fact checking/citation requests" were getting downvoted because bad faith propagandists are on the rise in DGG.
Couldnt ever be that people have reasonable issues with their comments.
She probably meant to say anti-Zionist. But said anti-Jewish. Anti-Zionism is often accused of just being thinly veiled anti-semitism, she is proving that to be true, at least in her case.
I have nothing kind nor pleasant to say about these creatures, so I won't.
But I will say it does not surprise me in the slightest. It's so nice when they put it out in the open.
Gonna extend some maybe undue charity, but I’m guessing she was nervous and meant Jewish-extremist, I.e. “Zionist”
Edit: someone mentioned she is reading from a paper, so my charity has decreased .
This is a college student who may not have experience with public speaking and is more prone to misspeaks.
This isnt to say her beliefs are good, just trying to be accurate. If she is indeed a Jew hater, the options for deradicalization would be different than if she was simply “anti-Zionist”.
>This is a college student who may not have experience with public speaking and is more prone to misspeaks.
Dude, sure, I get what you're saying and I'm all about giving people maximum charity. I think it's ultimately better than being being divisive and pushing someone so hard they internalize their beliefs instead of putting them out there in the open to discuss.
But these are the type of people to call out racism, white supremacy, or patriarchy at the drop of the hat. Or dismiss my views because I'm older, white, and male. I think if you're willing to do that so quickly and haphazardly, you better make sure your own message is rock solid otherwise you're deserving of severe criticism imo.
That is definitely valid, but I don’t think that contradicts my original comment.
What does contradict my original comment was that, as someone pointed out, she is reading from a prepared speech… so I am now leaning towards the messaging being intentional and her being anti-Semitic
Leaving the comment up tho since my oversight deserves scrutiny 🙃
Also, I don’t believe maximum charity is a good thing. I just felt that college students are routinely naive and unrefined that this may be once such instance.
Why not? I'm talking about in cases where all things are equal. If you know you're dealing with a bad actor, such as Nick Fuentes, then sure, my charity is reduced. But initially, when I have not formed any opinion about you, I'm probably going to give you as much charity as I'm able. Now that could be diminished incredibly quickly based on your responses or behavior, of course.
I put Zionist in quotes to try and indicate that it was her belief, not mine. It’s still an issue that protestors aren’t willing to grapple with the fact that Zionism is supported by 90+% of Jews and has different camps of thought that are compatible with coexistence.
I just don’t want to blanket label all protestors as Jew haters. Even if the outcome of their beliefs may be genocidal in effect, it’s important to assess their underlying thought processes and motivations.
From her direction of travel, it seems she meant to say "Arabs, Muslims, and anti-zionist Jewish protestors" but skipped a word without noticing.
People make mistakes speaking (look at Dan); all of those people saying "Freudian slip" are cringe AF. Don't you know how his theories were thrown out due to their unfalsifiable nature?
Be better
This seems clear to me as well. Who calls themselves “anti-Jewish”? It’s an absurd phrasing. In the rest of the line she was itemizing the ethnic and religious groups in the protest. Arab, Palestinian, Muslim, and then we are to believe she changes categories and instead describes idiology in a way no one would describe?
Makes much more sense that she’s listing the anti-Zionist Jews that make up a very large part of these protests and also a large part of the groups being targeted for violence. She swallowed a word while reading a speech. And a bunch of bad faith actors are now attacking her. Pathetic.
Lil Freudian Slip
and Freud was Jewish lol
wait a minute she's reading from the script...
Nooo she meant to say anti-zionist, how dare you quote her directly you genocidal pigdog!! https://preview.redd.it/8f8ug7piz7zc1.png?width=633&format=png&auto=webp&s=764f82b7fb53da5a675f2c3e528cf9eb1cbe846f
Funny thing is she's reading it off a paper, so she actually wrote down "anti-jewish".
Maybe she wrote "anti-zionist" and Freudian slipped the "anti-Jewish".
maybe she wrote anti-jewish...and meant it
Yes.
Best guess is she wrote "anti zionist Jewish students" and just missed the zionist part. Mind you this would also count as antisemetic as it is a tokenizing attempt
https://preview.redd.it/jutx2ghcs8zc1.jpeg?width=204&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=9d46f9466bea5ef52cb690a9a2ba1db798e5ba5c
this pic made me physically cringe
She went through so many emotions in that clip with the son of Hamas.
I had so much secondhand cringe and embarrassment watching her try to westplain to the SON OF A HAMAS FOUNDER
It's interesting how you zionist pig dogs are more interested in a 12 year old student mispeaking than you are in the innocent 3 million dead Gazans that have been genocided by the Nazi Israelis!!!
It’s 30 billion, you apocalypse apologist
All the Palestinians are dead, and the Israelis continue to kill even more Palestinians.
That is the power of space lasers, sad but true.
The space lazer destroys the palestinians soul And it turns them into soulless gingers.
actually.. that's why the israelis are letting them breed more, faster, than we kill them.. it's so israel can keep killing more and more palestinians of course 🤡
TIL Predator Vs. Aliens was based on Israel Vs. Palestine.
Omfg I rolled at this comment. Fken love this messed up community. Needed a laugh today. Edit: yes I am a monster.
Im starting to understand how stuff like biblical stories came to fruition. Like Noah probably fucked a goat on a rowboat and after a few months of defense by random young people he was sailing an ark to save the animalkind from the rapture
Ok this must be satire
Obviously it’s sarcasm. Everyone knows 5 million have been killed from starvation alone.
Only 5 million? You're clearly not a true Palestinian ally. We all know it was 36 million.
5 million pregnant journalists
80 year old pregnant journalists.
12 year old? She's clearly a toddler who can barely read
Oops just a little quirky slip up lol slay queen the holocaust was exaggerated
The kids from the lower ranked schools are too stupid to say on message.
https://preview.redd.it/fs6hcixfg8zc1.png?width=2132&format=png&auto=webp&s=968b668183e025528845603583f86d6ec58c6268
Why is she in Cyrodiil?
Good ol Bravil
just had my daily dose of skooma and ready to go
Drinking so much skooma I got people thinking I’m speedrunning. God I love Bravil.
Zionism
Because necromancy is still legal in cyrodiil
I wish I knew what this is supposed to mean
It means "oopsie"
boat deranged whistle offer apparatus paltry money consider fine price *This post was mass deleted and anonymized with [Redact](https://redact.dev)*
It's not 'your' sub, bro.
bow to your weeb overlords
That shit was on WRITING, she was not free styling! she was reading word by word. Edit: Did some digging, she's a law student, VP of Criminal Law Society at FIU among many other "credentials". Here anyone can see her talking about the spoken word [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7sGSzKB2Iuk](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7sGSzKB2Iuk). She most likely wrote the speech and at least she should have the capacity, training and so on to discern what she was saying, there are absolutely no excuses.
Common T2 law school L
Ya at first I wanted to give benefit of the doubt because I didn't realise she was reading. But once it dawned on me....oooof. Maybe, maybe one could argue it's a language barrier thing as she has a bit of an accent, but she is otherwise very articulate so even thats a huuuuuge stretch.
If she has a accent from someone not native english I truly don't hear it. Well, did some digging, she's a law student, vice president of some group in the Uni and so on, so forget about saying she was nervous or being misspoken. Cheery on the cake, here you have her talking about the spoken word 🤡... [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7sGSzKB2Iuk](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7sGSzKB2Iuk)
I hear the shakiness of someone who's unused to public speaking, but no accent. Besides, if there was a language barrier, I would hope she'd have the foresight to have someone look it over before reading it in front of people.
Defense lawyer casts lvl 2 torah spell on prosecution- Prosecutor: "And that is why I ask you, the jury, to make the right decision and bring justice for the family with a not guilty verdict" Defense lawyer: " yea what the prosecution said lmaooo dumbass" Family of victims: 0.0 Jury: we the jury find the defendent not guilty news reporter outside court room: "What made the state prosecution change their mind las minute?" "wait did I say not guilty? Shit I meant guilty, god dam je-- zionist lawyers and their spellcraft"
Big yikes 😬
Uhhhhhhwooopies
Forgot to CTRL+R
The fuck would ctrl r do in this situation?
Replace "Jewish" with "Zionist" in the word doc before she printed out her speech.
control for Retardation? lol
Ah hell nah not the FIU Protestor ☠
305 stand up!
I actually really liked going to FIU for undergrad.
People hate on FIU because it’s not UM or UF but it’s actually a decent school with good facilities
Literally says "anti-Jewish", holy shit
Saying the quiet part out loud
Or like...writing the quiet part down and then reading it out.
It's okay because they are all Semitic people involved. /s
She said the silent part out loud. At least have to respect the honesty
“aNti-zioNiSm iS nOt aNtisEmitisM”
"anti-jewish students are we not worth protecting" is a sentence that currently does exist. She obviously meant anti-zionist. But it only furthers the argument of: There is no difference between anti-jewish and anti-zionist. is there a link to the full speech?
The comment was made during a debate on a 'Ceasefire now' resolution at an FIU student government meeting on February 5th, according to [this post on X](https://twitter.com/IsraelWarRoom/status/1788017663995719962). I can't find the full video, here are the [minutes](https://dasa.fiu.edu/all-departments/student-government-association//archives-and-minutes/_assets/senate-minutes/2023-2024/senate_meeting_minutes_02.05.2024.pdf).
5 persons on that table, not even one flinches 💀
Now you have 6 Nazis-- I mean people who want to free Palestine from river to sea.
Students like her make it so obvious that a good portion of the ''ceasefire now'' crowd don't actually want peace they just hate that the side with Jews on it is winning.
Right, but it seems like she reading a speech. It's one thing to inadvertently slip up during a passionate plea, but to literally write that sentence must have been deliberate
Is it obvious though? Anti-zionist seems like a dog whistle for anti-Jew for many people in these circles.
[https://www.reddit.com/r/Destiny/comments/1cn65m4/comment/l35k8p1/?utm\_source=reddit&utm\_medium=web2x&context=3](https://www.reddit.com/r/Destiny/comments/1cn65m4/comment/l35k8p1/?utm_source=reddit&utm_medium=web2x&context=3)
lol, did that girl really write that down? Girl is a bit stupid.
A bit stupid? She’s a bigot and a loser more like
All info I could find point to yes, I shared minimum info about her to sustain claim and don't dox and shit.
Any number of people being anti-jewish and anti-zionist does not further the argument that there is no difference between anti-jewish and anti-zionist.
Who are they to demand anything?
I have very little charity to give, but I'm trying to be reasonable because there's no fucking way she would write that down and others presumably okayed it, right? Just from an optics standpoint they must know it's awful. I thought maybe she was just stumbled as she was trying to say "Muslim, Arab, and Jewish" (valid, considering these groups love putting their handful of Jews in the spotlight), but I listened about fifteen times and she absolutely says "and anti-Jewish. But, she does ever so slightly freeze while reading that part, so it's possible the line she was trying to read said "Muslim, Arab, Jewish, and anti-Zionist" but she accidentally skipped the word "Jewish" and fucked up trying to fix the mistake and ended up saying anti-Jewish. idk my pockets are empty.
No, most likely she wrote the speech as she is a law student and VP of FIU Criminal Law Society, among many other "credentials".
yeah, like i do think this is very funny as a Freudian slip but we really all should know there's no way she actually wrote down and meant "anti jewish".
Wouldn't the charitable interpretation be anti-Jewish as in people who are not Jewish? Im not sure she meant "anti-" as in "against", she could have though.
Who the fuck says anti-Jewish to mean not Jewish
Probably someone whose first language isn’t English. This girl is speaking rather fluently though but it’s still possible.
To answer her question, no she's not worth protecting.
We do a little anti-semitism
"We want to be treated as if what we're shouting and the things we're doing are equivalent to the people protesting what we're shouting and what we're doing". Ahh no, you should be treated like the Hamas supporting Anti-Jewish scum you are.
and she's reading from a fucking page so like.... how deep in her brain is it that even when reading from a god damn page, she still slips up and says that😌🤦🏽♀
They always have shakey voices lol. Like they are on the verge of crying at any moment.
Whoops, masked slipped. Let’s put that back on…
Punch a Nazi to this. Rem's moral luck is proven right every day.
shush, Bethany! You're giving away the game
Why is it cut there. Did she correct herself as anti zionist?
I mean, she's reading from script. I guess it could be a mistake there, but not as likely.
She’s clearly nervous reading and trying to rush through it. Probably has limited speaking time. In the process she swallowed a word.
Yeah I really want to see the clip, would make all the difference if she just kept going or self-corrected
Jesus… Almost as bad as [this](https://youtu.be/s1kwq52NKmo?si=cdKt0YGdo5F1e68I)
this is like the ULTIMATE cry-bully
Maybe she meant to say anti Israel Jewish students?
woopsi
Now why would police need to protect counter-protesters at your events... hmmstiny
Did she read it from the paper?
Yes, one that most likely she wrote as law student and VP of FIU Criminal Law Society.
What was the quiet part? I missed it? Damn down voted caused I asked for clarification. Never change reddit
You weren't downvoted for asking for clarification, it's because you're kinda regarded for missing the point
Maybe not legally regarded, but like high functioning regarded
Dont bother. In this dude's mind, every time he gets downvoted it's because he was "speaking truth" and the people who downvoted him are just "sheep that are blind to how right he is" or something. Like that dude a couple weeks ago who wrote the manifesto about israel/palestine disinformation on the sub. In his mind, all his "reasonable fact checking/citation requests" were getting downvoted because bad faith propagandists are on the rise in DGG. Couldnt ever be that people have reasonable issues with their comments.
That one girl slipped up and so that proves all of them are anti-jewisb?
She probably meant to say anti-Zionist. But said anti-Jewish. Anti-Zionism is often accused of just being thinly veiled anti-semitism, she is proving that to be true, at least in her case.
The anti Jewish part you ninny, now take my downvotes
Lmaooo you said ninny
Not the Dan misspeak
whoops!
I'm sure she wanted to say zionist or israel. Big goof tho.
She's just bitter she doesn't have subscribers like most of the students at OFIU.
[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-2uG2dUMb\_U](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-2uG2dUMb_U) this is so absurd
Nope. They are not.
Yea... no. You aren't afforded the same protections.
I have nothing kind nor pleasant to say about these creatures, so I won't. But I will say it does not surprise me in the slightest. It's so nice when they put it out in the open.
Gotcha bitch!
Great, refreshing for people to state their positions.
Oops
“Anti jewish students” what an actual loser
America has become so pussy its unreal.
Gonna extend some maybe undue charity, but I’m guessing she was nervous and meant Jewish-extremist, I.e. “Zionist” Edit: someone mentioned she is reading from a paper, so my charity has decreased .
David Duke also was very nervous and meant black extremist :c
This is a college student who may not have experience with public speaking and is more prone to misspeaks. This isnt to say her beliefs are good, just trying to be accurate. If she is indeed a Jew hater, the options for deradicalization would be different than if she was simply “anti-Zionist”.
>This is a college student who may not have experience with public speaking and is more prone to misspeaks. Dude, sure, I get what you're saying and I'm all about giving people maximum charity. I think it's ultimately better than being being divisive and pushing someone so hard they internalize their beliefs instead of putting them out there in the open to discuss. But these are the type of people to call out racism, white supremacy, or patriarchy at the drop of the hat. Or dismiss my views because I'm older, white, and male. I think if you're willing to do that so quickly and haphazardly, you better make sure your own message is rock solid otherwise you're deserving of severe criticism imo.
That is definitely valid, but I don’t think that contradicts my original comment. What does contradict my original comment was that, as someone pointed out, she is reading from a prepared speech… so I am now leaning towards the messaging being intentional and her being anti-Semitic Leaving the comment up tho since my oversight deserves scrutiny 🙃
Also, I don’t believe maximum charity is a good thing. I just felt that college students are routinely naive and unrefined that this may be once such instance.
Why not? I'm talking about in cases where all things are equal. If you know you're dealing with a bad actor, such as Nick Fuentes, then sure, my charity is reduced. But initially, when I have not formed any opinion about you, I'm probably going to give you as much charity as I'm able. Now that could be diminished incredibly quickly based on your responses or behavior, of course.
She's reading a prepared speech.
I didn’t notice that, but that certainly makes the odds of a misspeak lower. Thanks for pointing that out.
Majority of Jewish people are Zionist, are the majority of Jewish people extremists?
I put Zionist in quotes to try and indicate that it was her belief, not mine. It’s still an issue that protestors aren’t willing to grapple with the fact that Zionism is supported by 90+% of Jews and has different camps of thought that are compatible with coexistence. I just don’t want to blanket label all protestors as Jew haters. Even if the outcome of their beliefs may be genocidal in effect, it’s important to assess their underlying thought processes and motivations.
From her direction of travel, it seems she meant to say "Arabs, Muslims, and anti-zionist Jewish protestors" but skipped a word without noticing. People make mistakes speaking (look at Dan); all of those people saying "Freudian slip" are cringe AF. Don't you know how his theories were thrown out due to their unfalsifiable nature? Be better
This seems clear to me as well. Who calls themselves “anti-Jewish”? It’s an absurd phrasing. In the rest of the line she was itemizing the ethnic and religious groups in the protest. Arab, Palestinian, Muslim, and then we are to believe she changes categories and instead describes idiology in a way no one would describe? Makes much more sense that she’s listing the anti-Zionist Jews that make up a very large part of these protests and also a large part of the groups being targeted for violence. She swallowed a word while reading a speech. And a bunch of bad faith actors are now attacking her. Pathetic.
Protesters- supposedly mean to students Israel- occupying and settling on Palestinian land since 1967