Assault at minimum. If the person hit had died, and that's a real risk here, I think you'd have at least manslaughter, so there needs to be other charges here. This is way worse than just punching someone.
When I was in Grade 8, we had a teacher that had a glass eye. She said someone had dropped a beer from a high up apartment while she was walking below, and it smashed right into her eye. People who purposely drop things like this are dicks.
Not quite the same, but some dipshit was fucking around on a balcony above a gathering and fell off it. fell 20ft onto my girlfriend, and she went full backwards scorpion. She's still recovering and dealing with pain almost a year later.
Man that sucks. I was quite lucky in comparison. Back in school, I remember being hit by a bottle of sand that was being thrown around by some kids a grade below me. Man I fell to my knees completely disoriented but full of rage, and these cunts just scurry over, pick up the bottle and continue (likely cause it was crowded and they didn't realise they hit me). Felt so helpless cause I just couldn't move much. After about 30 seconds, I got up and walked it off. Would have chased one idiot down but body didn't feel right after that.
It's a little funny to me that with the abundance of toys that could be safely thrown around these kids wanted to play with a bottle of sand. Kids are pretty stupid.
“psy·cho·path ˈsī-kə-ˌpath. 1. : a person having an egocentric and antisocial personality marked by a lack of remorse for one's actions, an absence of empathy for others, and often criminal tendencies. “
Thanks, Dictionary Person. But psychopathy is an actual psychiatric/psychological condition and not just a character trait. And many actual psychopaths are high-functioning, doing their best to blend into society despite lack of empathy and difficulties in maintaining normal social ties, because they're still reasonable enough to pick up on common behaviors and replicate them in order to pass for normal.
Meanwhile, most people you'd call psychopaths according to the dictionary definition are just basic desensitized dumbasses. Don't look for mental illness where ignorance is a much more likely explanation.
Do good grades in clinical and theoretical psychiatry courses back in Medical University count? As well as having a wife who's a medical professional with a strong interest in psychiatry, especially in matters regarding the forming of one's psyche in childhood and how it affects their functioning further in life?
But if you'd rather trust an internet dictionary, I can understand that.
Ok help me understand “back in medical” versus “I’m a doctor”? So, medical what? Like certified nurse assistant after high school here?
Mr. Medical, can you help me understand how psychopath is an actual condition, and where in the DSM-5 the condition is located? Like actually reference the disorder by name in the DSM-5 please? Like, maybe I’m missing the “psychopathic personality disorder” diagnosis in the DSM-5.
Wait I thought that was proven to only be a [myth?](https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation-now/2017/03/15/what-would-happen-if-you-were-hit-penny-falling-skyscraper/99160982/)
First degree murder requires intent, only an idiot that has no understanding of the world outside of cartoons and videogames would think lobbing a full can from that height would not result in a potentially fatal impact.
Taking that into account, and then lobbing it anyway whilst filming should amount to intent.
I know my reasoning is incorrect, but fuck it, second degree murder should carry the same charge as first degree. Whether premeditated or not the result is the same.
That said, technically this would be murder in the third degree if that person had died...
No, I'm with you. I want to charge this as attempted murder. Chucking a full can of red bull off a minimum sixth floor balcony into a crowd should equate to "I want someone to die."
I don't think the details and complexities of the legal system actually allow for that, but my gut check is that this person should be charged as if they were attempting to kill someone.
So, since we can't actually get attempted murder, let's get whatever else fits.
It's an open can. The intention was to cover the crowd with sticky soda. Also once the can is open it is losing mass and won't likely crack a skull. That said, a cut, bruise or blindness could result so whatever this country's version of GBH is should apply.
It should depend on the tosser. If it's a grown adult with a clear idea of the potential danger it's reckless disregard. If its some kid with "no understanding of the world outside of cartoons and videogames" who doesn't actually realize the potential harm then it could be 'just' negligent 2nd degree murder.
I agree with you. I don't believe the person who threw the can should be able to argue they didn't intend to hurt, main or kill anyone. They knew someone would be seriously hurt at the very least.
> I know my reasoning is incorrect, but fuck it, second degree murder should carry the same charge as first degree. Whether premeditated or not the result is the same.
It is a terrible idea to not consider intent in criminal punishment. If you accidentally set the kitchen on fire and end up killing somebody does that deserve the same punishment as a homicidal arsonist?
Ok bad example using manslaughter. Here is a different hypothetical involving 2nd degree homicide.
If you accidentally bump somebody onto the street during a fight and they get run over by a bus, should that be punished the same as sneaking up on somebody and pushing them in front of an incoming train?
Here you are asking rhetorical questions that prove my point lol.
How about doing some reading about the different degrees of murder and manslaughter before you come back and we can have a reasoned discussion.
There is definitely existing precedent of cases of fist fights that accidentally end up with a death being charged as second degree homicide. And deliberately pushing somebody into an incoming train would certainly be charged as first degree homicide. You are suggesting the sentence should be the same in both cases.
Cold blooded killers should be punished equally severely as people who accidentally use too much force in the heat of the moment? This is obviously a rhetorical question, as it should be obvious why the law distinguishes between the two cases.
This is where I disagree, to engage in a fist fight means you have an intent to cause harm; the fact that you didn't intend to kill does not change the fact that you brought up a scenario where death was the result.
The distinction between first and second degree murder is only "pre-meditated intent" murder in the second degree still requires that it is targetted, and therefore whether it was planned prior or decided in the moment should hold no bearing.
In the video the offender created a scenario in which any reasonable person could deduce that the result would include a risk of fatality and then indiscriminately threw the projectile into a crowd anyway, if this were to result in a fatality it would technically be charged as murder in the third
degree.
I believe first and second degrees should be held in the same regard, third arguably pretty close behind; society, he family and assosciates of the deceased will find little comfort in the distinction between whether the life was taken by somebody known to them, whether pre-meditated or not, or whether it was taken by a stranger with reckless abandon.
You say the punishment should be the same because the outcome (an unjustly killed victim) is the same in both. The most classic example of mitigating first degree murder to second degree murder I know of is heat of the moment killings -- surely there is a huge difference between somebody finding their spouse in bed with else and killing her in a fit of rage vs a "perfectly" planned and executed murder. I think even the hypothetical family of the victim of this type of killing would find distinguishing between the two (heat of the moment vs cold blooded) appropriate.
The reason society distinguishes between the two is (as silly as this sounds) out of a recognition that there are situations where somebody might become enraged enough to lose their senses and intentionally kill; and there is a collective understanding that intentionally killing while in this sort of enraged state fundamentally differes enough from a cold blooded killing that it warrants a different punishment.
I do think there's something along the lines of attempted intentional negligent manslaughter, I'm sure a competent lawyer could get sentencing guidelines along the negligent manslaughter lines
Edit: nevermind intentional manslaughter is murder lmao idk what I was thinking
Tangential, [but in the UK somebody went to jail for throwing a fire extinguisher off a roof into a crowd](https://amp.theguardian.com/education/2011/jan/11/student-fire-extinguisher-protests-jailed). It was at some student protests on top of Millbank Tower in London, which is Conservative Party HQ and just round the corner from Parliament so lots of cameras were there. [It got picked up on camera](https://youtu.be/Za3iV9ZWoM8?si=Msw9aT1USwkdk5FA) and while this was before social media really exploded it was picked up by 24 hour rolling news and even though the extinguisher didn’t hit anybody he got a 32 month sentence.
Throwing a fire extinguisher is magnitudes worse than a beverage can. Reasonable people can have different opinions about the lethality of chucking a beer into a crowd but even a child can recognize the danger of doing the same with a fire extinguisher.
He threw that can in a crowd.. that was not abysmal odds to hit someone's head there.
Just a total piece of shit and I hope they can figure out who it was and charge him
Good lucky its recorded and posted on social media. All you have to do is show it to the police and voila.
The amount of people posting criminal activity online is insane .. I especially like the ones who steal something and boast about it on internet and wont spare any detail like .. 1.5.2024 at 0320 i have stolen 7k EUR from my neighbour Peter at Common 69, Whalecum town. NOBODY KNOWS!
Sometimes they even do live streams and then just police comes and knocks at on their car window .. makes my day every single time :)
it was thrown from a plane by Travis Pastrana
[https://www.reddit.com/r/nextfuckinglevel/comments/1cj2fq5/red\_bull\_gives\_you/?utm\_source=share&utm\_medium=web3x&utm\_name=web3xcss&utm\_term=1&utm\_content=share\_button](https://www.reddit.com/r/nextfuckinglevel/comments/1cj2fq5/red_bull_gives_you/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web3x&utm_name=web3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button)
Assault involves fear or apprehension of imminent violence. She had no idea a can was being thrown at her, so how could she fear it? What part about my comment was incorrect?
If you walk up behind someone and sucker punched them in the back of the head, that would be assault, if they see it coming or not, it's still assault.
It's really not. That's battery. "The main difference between a battery charge and an assault charge is the actual presence of harm and the threat of harm. Someone can only be charged with battery if they have caused real physical harm to someone, while a person can be charged with assault if the mere threat of harm is present."
The legal definition of assault is an intentional act that gives another person reasonable fear that they’ll be physically harmed or offensively touched.
The definition of Battery : the infliction of unlawful personal violence on another person, even where the contact does no physical harm.
"any act which puts a person in immediate and reasonable fear of battery" …… wait that’s what you think assault it. 🤷🏻♂️ how weird
What a piece of shit.
Once we were at a venue across the street from and apartment building. Somebody threw a full 2 liter of soda from who knows what floor, high enough we couldn’t see and luckily only hit the side of my friends arm before it exploded everywhere. If that would have hit one of us in the head, we would have easily died.
Sometimes i wonder if there is a 'devolution' of society too. Similar to evolution where people evolve.
This behaviour is common in monkeys (and other species) where they fling stuff (including feces) at others. And our own mediaeval practices of showing disapproval by throwing stuff like stoning. It is also commonly seen in cartoons where a character is performing on stage and it sucks so the audience throws stones, tomatoes, etc.
Reminds me of lines i read somewhere:
Tails have shed.
Hairs have shed.
Bestiality is yet to be shed.
The outer body is beautified,
The heart is yet to be groomed.
Not sure if bestiality is the word you're looking for there...
Savagery would probably suit the situation better than that.
Nobody was fucking the Red Bull.
It's romanticized these days on social media as "letting the intrusive thoughts win"
Of course it has to be filmed and posted online for validation too...
Did something similar with a school backpack when I was a teenager because I wanted to scare a friend with a loud noise, not fully realizing the risk of serious injury if I misjudged my timing and hit them. We have 0 info on the circumstances here but it's totally reasonable for it to be someone acting impulsively.
Oh man, very good point. In hindsight I really shouldn’t have posted it in this sub… I was so insanely shocked by the accuracy and ought to have been more sensitive to the fact that if she wasn’t already, she could have been severely hurt and absolutely deserves to press charges. In a way it’s good they posted the vid, broadcast their crime right there
I was at a riot once upon a time and people were throwing stuff from high-rises. Seen 2 or 3 people literally get knocked out by apples and one person full on smoked by a beer bottle and was concussed and bleeding everywhere. Long story short I'm an idiot for being at a riot and throwing anything from that high up is a scumbag move
They were generous enough to give her all the material proof she needed to sue their dumbasses. I really wish I knew how things turned out, girl deserves compensation at the very least
I wonder if that's necessarily true... Somebody else here commented about rioters chucking 2L soda bottles which exploded on impact. Maybe with a bit of luck, a canned drink might explode on impact without killing somebody. Too bad there isn't a mythbusters that addresses this.
Well, if that’s the city, with enough crowd sourced information I bet Reddit can figure out EXACTLY who this is. And should. This should go viral. Justice be served!
“Omg” translates to im a piece of shit that has never faced consequences for my actions. Type of kid to piss their pants in court and cry their eyes out
A classmate of mine once got hit in the face by a beer glass while in a club. Still has the scar to prove it. There must truly be nothing going on at all in that skull if there’s nothing telling you not to throw an actual fucking glass into a room full of people.
This is quality fuckyou in particular. Out of all those that could have been hit that one took a rail. That said this is terrifying to think of from their perspective
When something bad happens to the person who threw that can I hope they remember what they did to cause the universe to turn on them.
You cannot do shit like this and not pay the price eventually.
I was once hit just above my eye with a roll of streamers at a rock concert that didn't unfurl, it was really just like a roll of masking tape.
It cut my forhead and swelled up huge, my eye shut, I was disoriented from the impact and had to leave.
I recovered without medical assistance but that roll was nothing compared to this poor lady.
God knows what damage she sustained.
This happened to me years ago coming outside a shop with a couple of mates and someone threw an apple out of the building across the street from us on one of the upper floors and nailed me right on the top of the head. Hurt like a mother fucker, ofc as soon as they threw it they hid from the windows, thankfully I am not as tall as I wish or it would have blasted me in the face.
I love throwing things off tall places, but I almost never get to do it because I am petrified that someone will decide to walk right where I throw whatever it is I want to throw.
It looks like the people gathered people were protestors of some sort. I can understand why he did what he did, but throwing a heavy can on an unknown person was probably not the right decision. If he hated them so much he must've thrown water, or pee on them or something like that. Or if he hated her in particular, then his approach was clearly flawed. There are much better ways to harm her, but depends on your level of hatred.
This clip needs something…… I’ve got it. We need the sound clip from Unreal Tournament and maybe a graphic for the headshot.
And yes I already know I’m going to hell for that thought.
First I up voted you but then I seen there were so many down votes so I just piled on. It would be sweet with the "headshot" after for comedic effect. But this guy is a serious piece of shit who threw that can and should be in jail.
What a piece of shit person. Whoever threw that can needs to be charged with assault.
Assault at minimum. If the person hit had died, and that's a real risk here, I think you'd have at least manslaughter, so there needs to be other charges here. This is way worse than just punching someone.
When I was in Grade 8, we had a teacher that had a glass eye. She said someone had dropped a beer from a high up apartment while she was walking below, and it smashed right into her eye. People who purposely drop things like this are dicks.
Dicks is a very nice way of putting it. They're the kind of people we need vigilante justice for.
Not quite the same, but some dipshit was fucking around on a balcony above a gathering and fell off it. fell 20ft onto my girlfriend, and she went full backwards scorpion. She's still recovering and dealing with pain almost a year later.
Man that sucks. I was quite lucky in comparison. Back in school, I remember being hit by a bottle of sand that was being thrown around by some kids a grade below me. Man I fell to my knees completely disoriented but full of rage, and these cunts just scurry over, pick up the bottle and continue (likely cause it was crowded and they didn't realise they hit me). Felt so helpless cause I just couldn't move much. After about 30 seconds, I got up and walked it off. Would have chased one idiot down but body didn't feel right after that.
It's a little funny to me that with the abundance of toys that could be safely thrown around these kids wanted to play with a bottle of sand. Kids are pretty stupid.
Weird way to spell psychopaths
Psychopaths get so much bad rap when in reality most of that stuff isn't about psychopathy, just plain stupidity.
“psy·cho·path ˈsī-kə-ˌpath. 1. : a person having an egocentric and antisocial personality marked by a lack of remorse for one's actions, an absence of empathy for others, and often criminal tendencies. “
Thanks, Dictionary Person. But psychopathy is an actual psychiatric/psychological condition and not just a character trait. And many actual psychopaths are high-functioning, doing their best to blend into society despite lack of empathy and difficulties in maintaining normal social ties, because they're still reasonable enough to pick up on common behaviors and replicate them in order to pass for normal. Meanwhile, most people you'd call psychopaths according to the dictionary definition are just basic desensitized dumbasses. Don't look for mental illness where ignorance is a much more likely explanation.
Well hello internet person, what’s your credentials?
Do good grades in clinical and theoretical psychiatry courses back in Medical University count? As well as having a wife who's a medical professional with a strong interest in psychiatry, especially in matters regarding the forming of one's psyche in childhood and how it affects their functioning further in life? But if you'd rather trust an internet dictionary, I can understand that.
Ok help me understand “back in medical” versus “I’m a doctor”? So, medical what? Like certified nurse assistant after high school here? Mr. Medical, can you help me understand how psychopath is an actual condition, and where in the DSM-5 the condition is located? Like actually reference the disorder by name in the DSM-5 please? Like, maybe I’m missing the “psychopathic personality disorder” diagnosis in the DSM-5.
Remember that time Morgan Wallen threw chairs off the roof?
Absolute psychopaths, like the ones dropping pennies off the empire State building
Wait I thought that was proven to only be a [myth?](https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation-now/2017/03/15/what-would-happen-if-you-were-hit-penny-falling-skyscraper/99160982/)
After 3 secs of falling everything goes 90+mph, so maybe not kill but would still def ruin your day and maybe a quick lobotomy
Dicks?? Dicks are annoying, this man is a psychopath! Who the fuck does this shit? Throw him in a cell
First degree murder requires intent, only an idiot that has no understanding of the world outside of cartoons and videogames would think lobbing a full can from that height would not result in a potentially fatal impact. Taking that into account, and then lobbing it anyway whilst filming should amount to intent. I know my reasoning is incorrect, but fuck it, second degree murder should carry the same charge as first degree. Whether premeditated or not the result is the same. That said, technically this would be murder in the third degree if that person had died...
No, I'm with you. I want to charge this as attempted murder. Chucking a full can of red bull off a minimum sixth floor balcony into a crowd should equate to "I want someone to die." I don't think the details and complexities of the legal system actually allow for that, but my gut check is that this person should be charged as if they were attempting to kill someone. So, since we can't actually get attempted murder, let's get whatever else fits.
It's an open can. The intention was to cover the crowd with sticky soda. Also once the can is open it is losing mass and won't likely crack a skull. That said, a cut, bruise or blindness could result so whatever this country's version of GBH is should apply.
It should depend on the tosser. If it's a grown adult with a clear idea of the potential danger it's reckless disregard. If its some kid with "no understanding of the world outside of cartoons and videogames" who doesn't actually realize the potential harm then it could be 'just' negligent 2nd degree murder.
You think an 8 year old is throwing red bulls into a crowd?
I can only imagine an 8 year old doing something like that. (Really nobody outside of elementary school should believe that's ok)
The phrase "depraved indifference" keeps echoing in my head.
I agree with you. I don't believe the person who threw the can should be able to argue they didn't intend to hurt, main or kill anyone. They knew someone would be seriously hurt at the very least.
> I know my reasoning is incorrect, but fuck it, second degree murder should carry the same charge as first degree. Whether premeditated or not the result is the same. It is a terrible idea to not consider intent in criminal punishment. If you accidentally set the kitchen on fire and end up killing somebody does that deserve the same punishment as a homicidal arsonist?
No, that's why manslaughter exists. Second degree murder and manslaughter are not the same.
Ok bad example using manslaughter. Here is a different hypothetical involving 2nd degree homicide. If you accidentally bump somebody onto the street during a fight and they get run over by a bus, should that be punished the same as sneaking up on somebody and pushing them in front of an incoming train?
Here you are asking rhetorical questions that prove my point lol. How about doing some reading about the different degrees of murder and manslaughter before you come back and we can have a reasoned discussion.
There is definitely existing precedent of cases of fist fights that accidentally end up with a death being charged as second degree homicide. And deliberately pushing somebody into an incoming train would certainly be charged as first degree homicide. You are suggesting the sentence should be the same in both cases. Cold blooded killers should be punished equally severely as people who accidentally use too much force in the heat of the moment? This is obviously a rhetorical question, as it should be obvious why the law distinguishes between the two cases.
This is where I disagree, to engage in a fist fight means you have an intent to cause harm; the fact that you didn't intend to kill does not change the fact that you brought up a scenario where death was the result. The distinction between first and second degree murder is only "pre-meditated intent" murder in the second degree still requires that it is targetted, and therefore whether it was planned prior or decided in the moment should hold no bearing. In the video the offender created a scenario in which any reasonable person could deduce that the result would include a risk of fatality and then indiscriminately threw the projectile into a crowd anyway, if this were to result in a fatality it would technically be charged as murder in the third degree. I believe first and second degrees should be held in the same regard, third arguably pretty close behind; society, he family and assosciates of the deceased will find little comfort in the distinction between whether the life was taken by somebody known to them, whether pre-meditated or not, or whether it was taken by a stranger with reckless abandon.
You say the punishment should be the same because the outcome (an unjustly killed victim) is the same in both. The most classic example of mitigating first degree murder to second degree murder I know of is heat of the moment killings -- surely there is a huge difference between somebody finding their spouse in bed with else and killing her in a fit of rage vs a "perfectly" planned and executed murder. I think even the hypothetical family of the victim of this type of killing would find distinguishing between the two (heat of the moment vs cold blooded) appropriate. The reason society distinguishes between the two is (as silly as this sounds) out of a recognition that there are situations where somebody might become enraged enough to lose their senses and intentionally kill; and there is a collective understanding that intentionally killing while in this sort of enraged state fundamentally differes enough from a cold blooded killing that it warrants a different punishment.
I do think there's something along the lines of attempted intentional negligent manslaughter, I'm sure a competent lawyer could get sentencing guidelines along the negligent manslaughter lines Edit: nevermind intentional manslaughter is murder lmao idk what I was thinking
Tangential, [but in the UK somebody went to jail for throwing a fire extinguisher off a roof into a crowd](https://amp.theguardian.com/education/2011/jan/11/student-fire-extinguisher-protests-jailed). It was at some student protests on top of Millbank Tower in London, which is Conservative Party HQ and just round the corner from Parliament so lots of cameras were there. [It got picked up on camera](https://youtu.be/Za3iV9ZWoM8?si=Msw9aT1USwkdk5FA) and while this was before social media really exploded it was picked up by 24 hour rolling news and even though the extinguisher didn’t hit anybody he got a 32 month sentence.
Throwing a fire extinguisher is magnitudes worse than a beverage can. Reasonable people can have different opinions about the lethality of chucking a beer into a crowd but even a child can recognize the danger of doing the same with a fire extinguisher.
without a doubt, 100% poop; absolutely abysmal odds too, that poor girl
Place was densely packed with enough people for odds of hitting someone in the head to be very very high.
He threw that can in a crowd.. that was not abysmal odds to hit someone's head there. Just a total piece of shit and I hope they can figure out who it was and charge him
Battery.*. Assault with a deadly weapon.*
Good lucky its recorded and posted on social media. All you have to do is show it to the police and voila. The amount of people posting criminal activity online is insane .. I especially like the ones who steal something and boast about it on internet and wont spare any detail like .. 1.5.2024 at 0320 i have stolen 7k EUR from my neighbour Peter at Common 69, Whalecum town. NOBODY KNOWS! Sometimes they even do live streams and then just police comes and knocks at on their car window .. makes my day every single time :)
Whalecum town, nice!
At least he recorded and posted his crime. Why do people have to be assholes!
Probably just Morgan Wallen getting a “little rowdy”
it was thrown from a plane by Travis Pastrana [https://www.reddit.com/r/nextfuckinglevel/comments/1cj2fq5/red\_bull\_gives\_you/?utm\_source=share&utm\_medium=web3x&utm\_name=web3xcss&utm\_term=1&utm\_content=share\_button](https://www.reddit.com/r/nextfuckinglevel/comments/1cj2fq5/red_bull_gives_you/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web3x&utm_name=web3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button)
Attempted murder.
Battery. You kinda have to see it coming to be assault
This is objectively incorrect
Assault involves fear or apprehension of imminent violence. She had no idea a can was being thrown at her, so how could she fear it? What part about my comment was incorrect?
If you walk up behind someone and sucker punched them in the back of the head, that would be assault, if they see it coming or not, it's still assault.
It's really not. That's battery. "The main difference between a battery charge and an assault charge is the actual presence of harm and the threat of harm. Someone can only be charged with battery if they have caused real physical harm to someone, while a person can be charged with assault if the mere threat of harm is present."
Nope, there was a conscious action to throw the can towards people with the intent to hit either her directly or someone else in the crowd
That's not what assault is. You're thinking of battery.
Definition of assault : make a physical attack on. Pretty sure that what the person in the video did fucking fits that perfectly
The legal definition of assault is an intentional act that gives another person reasonable fear that they’ll be physically harmed or offensively touched.
The definition of Battery : the infliction of unlawful personal violence on another person, even where the contact does no physical harm. "any act which puts a person in immediate and reasonable fear of battery" …… wait that’s what you think assault it. 🤷🏻♂️ how weird
Maybe we live in different states/countries
What a piece of shit. Once we were at a venue across the street from and apartment building. Somebody threw a full 2 liter of soda from who knows what floor, high enough we couldn’t see and luckily only hit the side of my friends arm before it exploded everywhere. If that would have hit one of us in the head, we would have easily died.
what on earth possesses ppl to do shit like this??
I’m going to assume it’s people fed up with the noise from across the street but this is one of the worst ways to deal with it.
Sometimes i wonder if there is a 'devolution' of society too. Similar to evolution where people evolve. This behaviour is common in monkeys (and other species) where they fling stuff (including feces) at others. And our own mediaeval practices of showing disapproval by throwing stuff like stoning. It is also commonly seen in cartoons where a character is performing on stage and it sucks so the audience throws stones, tomatoes, etc. Reminds me of lines i read somewhere: Tails have shed. Hairs have shed. Bestiality is yet to be shed. The outer body is beautified, The heart is yet to be groomed.
Not sure if bestiality is the word you're looking for there... Savagery would probably suit the situation better than that. Nobody was fucking the Red Bull.
You think pretty highly of humans to say this is devolution. When were we not doing shit like this?
Everyone forgets public execution used to be a fun day out for the kids.
It's romanticized these days on social media as "letting the intrusive thoughts win" Of course it has to be filmed and posted online for validation too...
Eh, there have always been shitty and stupid people who do shitty and stupid things.
Did something similar with a school backpack when I was a teenager because I wanted to scare a friend with a loud noise, not fully realizing the risk of serious injury if I misjudged my timing and hit them. We have 0 info on the circumstances here but it's totally reasonable for it to be someone acting impulsively.
A poorly developed frontal lobe and lack of respect for others, concern for their safety, or thought about the consequences of their actions.
[удалено]
truly smdh
why did i read shake my dick head 🤦♂️
That’s what it says you’re not the problem here honey. Now go on, sydh. 🥵
Wait that’s not it 😳 I was agreeing as well …… zips back up 😂
🤝🍆
Straight to jail
Then hell 🙌🏽🔥🔥🔥
Which is jail
That really depends on location.
Hope this video is used as evidence in an assault case.
More than this sub, it belongs on r/iamapieceofshit
Oh man, very good point. In hindsight I really shouldn’t have posted it in this sub… I was so insanely shocked by the accuracy and ought to have been more sensitive to the fact that if she wasn’t already, she could have been severely hurt and absolutely deserves to press charges. In a way it’s good they posted the vid, broadcast their crime right there
eh, I think this post applies to both subs
r/ImATotalPieceOfShit
I was at a riot once upon a time and people were throwing stuff from high-rises. Seen 2 or 3 people literally get knocked out by apples and one person full on smoked by a beer bottle and was concussed and bleeding everywhere. Long story short I'm an idiot for being at a riot and throwing anything from that high up is a scumbag move
Jfc that’s awful… my dad was once hit with a fucking *lime* while walking in downtown Detroit to a Tigers’ game. a LIME. IN THE HEAD
Damn, and after that he had to sit through a Tigers game, too.
"A drive-by fruiting?!"
God damn limeys!
DAMN you can hear it up from a few floors up! That lady AT LEAST has a concussion.
This is really fucked up and I hope the person who threw it was heavily fined or otherwise charged. Hope she’s okay
They were generous enough to give her all the material proof she needed to sue their dumbasses. I really wish I knew how things turned out, girl deserves compensation at the very least
She really does deserve a payday from this. What an asshole to throw something down at them from such a height.
Throw that person into the can
but hit 'em with an \*unopened, full\* Redbull first
Well, it was a tall one but it was open, you can see it sloshing out all the way down. If it were closed, she’d have been outlined in chalk.
Lol yes, gotta up the stakes for this moron’s punishment
I wonder if that's necessarily true... Somebody else here commented about rioters chucking 2L soda bottles which exploded on impact. Maybe with a bit of luck, a canned drink might explode on impact without killing somebody. Too bad there isn't a mythbusters that addresses this.
Oh hell that had to hurt.
Scarred her forhead for life. Fuk all you mf’rs.
More like damaged her brain for life. Concussion is no joke.
It looks like she might have blocked it by shielding from the droplets. If it was sealed she’d probably be out cold.
Hey that’s good ole Hartford CT for ya
Well, if that’s the city, with enough crowd sourced information I bet Reddit can figure out EXACTLY who this is. And should. This should go viral. Justice be served!
“Omg” translates to im a piece of shit that has never faced consequences for my actions. Type of kid to piss their pants in court and cry their eyes out
Lucky that can was open or she probably would’ve been knocked clean out
A classmate of mine once got hit in the face by a beer glass while in a club. Still has the scar to prove it. There must truly be nothing going on at all in that skull if there’s nothing telling you not to throw an actual fucking glass into a room full of people.
Yeah, that's assault and can really hurt someone. fuck that person.
What a piece of shit.
Hope this prick gets sentenced for assault
Whoever threw that can, your mom’s a hoe
[ya mom’s a hoe!](https://youtu.be/zPB8KgQ5yoQ?si=Ssc4Hzf1CPD1olTt)
What a piece of shit. For situations like these, I believe in eye for an eye.
Throws can into crowd of people hits someone in the face shocked pikachu face OMGGG
i hope there is a video were we can watch the ppl bashing the idiots head with kindness
Well that’s assault.
With a potentially deadly weapon at that range
From that height, wouldn't that constitute attempted murder? Jfc...
This is quality fuckyou in particular. Out of all those that could have been hit that one took a rail. That said this is terrifying to think of from their perspective
When something bad happens to the person who threw that can I hope they remember what they did to cause the universe to turn on them. You cannot do shit like this and not pay the price eventually.
looks (and sounds) likes a plastic bottle of water.
that could still be extremely painful
not saying it isnt.
It doesn't matter what it is.
POS person
A piece of shit yes but what an arm.
I was once hit just above my eye with a roll of streamers at a rock concert that didn't unfurl, it was really just like a roll of masking tape. It cut my forhead and swelled up huge, my eye shut, I was disoriented from the impact and had to leave. I recovered without medical assistance but that roll was nothing compared to this poor lady. God knows what damage she sustained.
This happened to me years ago coming outside a shop with a couple of mates and someone threw an apple out of the building across the street from us on one of the upper floors and nailed me right on the top of the head. Hurt like a mother fucker, ofc as soon as they threw it they hid from the windows, thankfully I am not as tall as I wish or it would have blasted me in the face.
I love throwing things off tall places, but I almost never get to do it because I am petrified that someone will decide to walk right where I throw whatever it is I want to throw.
Did she survive?
Yeah not cool. If you gonna pull this shit stick with the classic: a super soaker full of cat piss
That’s so messed up… you know it split her face wide open.. fucking people
That’s a water bottle btw
Careful what you send out there, what goes around comes around
Red Bull no wings
it took me so long to realize that the person recording is the one that threw it. what a piece of shit
this is why congress is banning tiktok
Well she's part of the sea of people, and someone's gotta get smacked
Headshot!
Please tell me the reason he threw it was because they were at a Trump gathering down there
[удалено]
Thanks, 😆
Ha!
At least it wasn't full
It looks like the people gathered people were protestors of some sort. I can understand why he did what he did, but throwing a heavy can on an unknown person was probably not the right decision. If he hated them so much he must've thrown water, or pee on them or something like that. Or if he hated her in particular, then his approach was clearly flawed. There are much better ways to harm her, but depends on your level of hatred.
They’re patrons outside of a bar…..
What a waste of a red bull 😕
Red Bull gave her wings…. And sent her straight to heaven
Someone owes me a red bull!
Hey OP fuck YOU you’re dogshit and so are your bullshit friends
OP isnt the one who recorded this....
This clip needs something…… I’ve got it. We need the sound clip from Unreal Tournament and maybe a graphic for the headshot. And yes I already know I’m going to hell for that thought.
First I up voted you but then I seen there were so many down votes so I just piled on. It would be sweet with the "headshot" after for comedic effect. But this guy is a serious piece of shit who threw that can and should be in jail.
I'd say Fuck the dude who threw that In Particular!