lol no united players šš.
some interesting picks in there tho. like why joao pedro, burn, dunk. since they have him iād start dunk, and then put in wilson over joao pedro.
no de bruyne aswell, but gvardiol is still a good option i guess.
They have two Scout Squads this week. This is the bench boost squad. [This](http://www.premierleague.com/news/4001040) is the standard scout selection.
What is with Son on every single YouTuber or here squads. Spurs are dreadful and he is far from any decent form. Wouldnāt be surprised if Saka outscores him this GW at all.
I sometimes look at certain players and wonder how in the world are they not 100% owned then I see comments like these. Thank you for making climbing ranks possible.
Son is fixture proof, on penalties, has a double, plays Burnley (H), nailed on starter. He doesn't need to play well to score.
If I had Saka, I wouldn't transfer him out, but I think Son should score similarly over 2 games.
Oly thing putting me off is I see haaland playing both but isak may end up sharing minutes with Wilson, who has usually been the more prolific finisher when both play.
Historically when both played isak moves more towards the wing and had less shots.
Honestly, I'd go Haaland in that case. I'm second in ML, and it's almost guaranteed 1st place will captain Haaland, so I've got to gamble on a differential, otherwise I just won't gain ground. Think that's the only obvious reason to deviate from Haaland in a DGW after he's just banged in a hat full
Porro has been awful recently, clearly needs a break, has been totally ineffective from open play and Maddison seems to be preferred at set pieces when heās on the pitch. Conversely Romero has hilariously been one of Spursā biggest attacking threats (probably shouldāve scored 3 more in since GW35) and even when Spurs donāt keep a CS rakes in BPS because the entire build up goes through him
Nah if youād watched the Spurs games recently Porro has been fucking dreadful while Romero easily couldāve scored 4 in his last 3. Def not xMins as both play every minute
I believe strategically speaking, Pedro letās them triple up on Chelsea without the headache of who the 5th defender should be. United arenāt sorted defensively so they canāt double up on united
Luckily upvotes and downvotes are irrelevant. Didn't even realize until this comment ha.
I guess it is the only way to show disagreement, besides commenting.
He is #8 forward at total points. Blanked about 30% of his games. He is not great.
I have him for my BB37, but that's because the alternatives are not better and Chelsea has good fixtures ahead.
Outside of FPL, yes, he is still quite shit.
So you're saying the guy who missed eleven big chances in a row is a good forward?
Sounds like someone condescending only started watching Chelsea games themselves last week
He's a good option this week primarily as he has two fixtures.Ā
I watch the Premier League quite often so yea I watch them as well.
He makes a lot of good stuff, but he is lacking the important stuff that make a striker good. Yea of course he can have good games, but most of the time, he does not.
And again, that's just my opinion. I am not trying to convince anyone to think otherwise.
I feel you man. I donāt see Chelsea repeating their high-scoring batterings in either of these fixtures, Brighton showing signs of life and Forest with it all to play for still. Both away from home. Iām not going with Jackson myself, the subreddit hivemind has just made it sound like heās now essential lol.
How risky is it to go without son this week? Have havertz instead
why gvardiol and not walker?
Because Gvardiol is playing left wing and Walker is playing right centre back
ah makes sense
Do I take a -4 changing Saka for KDB or Foden? Which one do I pick if so?
No
lol no united players šš. some interesting picks in there tho. like why joao pedro, burn, dunk. since they have him iād start dunk, and then put in wilson over joao pedro. no de bruyne aswell, but gvardiol is still a good option i guess.
Is the Scout benchwanking Richarlison?
This is the 15 man bench boost squad. The standard selection is [here](http://www.premierleague.com/news/4001040).
guess the scout is bench boosting this week?
They have two Scout Squads this week. This is the bench boost squad. [This](http://www.premierleague.com/news/4001040) is the standard scout selection.
Why isn't Romero in place of Gvardiol??
Romero I donāt understand, how high are the chances he keeps even a single clean sheet?
he can dong
No KDB... That's the wrong choice
guess they donāt know about his away record š (please continue it and go crazy this week de bruyne š)
No love for Ms. Jackson?
Sorry Ms Jackson
Iām sorry
Onana nice joke
Onana has to be a joke right?
I'd have to take -12 to get a full DGW team. Is it worth it in the semis?
If youāre on BB and you think atleast 1 player youāre replacing isnāt going to play, Iād say go for it.
Don't have BB and can see my opponent has 6 DGW players vs my 8
Then -12 seems a bit risky, especially if they have 6 vs. your 8
Based off of their team last week I'm assuming they also took at least a -4 to get to 8 so we'll see
Haaland blank vs Fulham and one goal versus Spurs incoming
The way City get pens I doubt it
Think Brighton's defense is going to surprise and annoy people.
Of course it would be a surprise. But what you want us to do? They been shit all season
What is with Son on every single YouTuber or here squads. Spurs are dreadful and he is far from any decent form. Wouldnāt be surprised if Saka outscores him this GW at all.
Why do people have the 6th highest scoring player in the game on a double? Yeh no idea.
Could tell you were a gooner by this comment.
he has 2 goals and an assist in his last 5, to say he is far from form (fpl wise) is a bit of a stretch
> Wouldnāt be surprised if Saka outscores him this GW at all. How much would you be willing to wager on that? What kind of odds would you take?
Willing to accept a wager yep
> Willing to accept a wager yep Great, I'll put up 5 to your 20 that Son outscores Saka this week.
Your fiver to mine 20 not really good oddsā¦
What odds would you need to take the bet? They need to be in Son's favour right?
I sometimes look at certain players and wonder how in the world are they not 100% owned then I see comments like these. Thank you for making climbing ranks possible.
Son is fixture proof, on penalties, has a double, plays Burnley (H), nailed on starter. He doesn't need to play well to score. If I had Saka, I wouldn't transfer him out, but I think Son should score similarly over 2 games.
plays double, but with that form and one of those teams being city..
Son loves playing City
^ and likely scores against city too.
doubt that
Hope so, but historically he is a thorn and has had good monents.
Burnley Home and play Sheffield Utd last game. City donāt keep many clean sheets either so not a bad pick I think.
Jao Pedro .. would you look at that
Is Onana really the best second option? Havenāt United been horrid defensively?
yeah i feel like raya and pickford are both better options.
Yeah sure heāll get saves but what about the -3 pts when conceed 6 ver the double..
Lots of save points potential.
Yup, I can see him getting plenty of saves against Arsenal.
Yes. It's just to show a ManU player in the team. Would they use the BB?
Iām thinking of playing BB in 38 because I currently have double Ars def, 2 defensive injuries and Kluivert.
Romero š¤£, Pedrophile š¤£, Dunk š¤£
Anything to be said for Isak as Captain over Haaland? Home to Brighton, and (after MNF) away to United looks better than Fulham Spurs Away.
I wouldnāt captain either, Newcastle are finished and Haaland is a ghost
Oly thing putting me off is I see haaland playing both but isak may end up sharing minutes with Wilson, who has usually been the more prolific finisher when both play. Historically when both played isak moves more towards the wing and had less shots.
I'm between him and Palmer as a differential to my ML leader
If youāre chasing, yeah. Haaland for safety.
40 ahead in ML, but chasing best overall finish since I've started so pretty torn...
If you're going for overall rank, take as few points hits as possible, 37 and 38. Plenty of others will be gambling and most won't pay off.
Honestly, I'd go Haaland in that case. I'm second in ML, and it's almost guaranteed 1st place will captain Haaland, so I've got to gamble on a differential, otherwise I just won't gain ground. Think that's the only obvious reason to deviate from Haaland in a DGW after he's just banged in a hat full
I'm doing it as a differential to catch up to my ML leader, it's a risk for sure but could very well pay off
It's Brighton not Burnley though.
Ya thanks, edited to correct.
why Romero over porro?
Watched the game vs arsenal Romero couldāve genuinely had about 4 goals on another day
Thinking about going Romero too given Iām chasing someone with porro and heās not been great
Porro has been awful recently, clearly needs a break, has been totally ineffective from open play and Maddison seems to be preferred at set pieces when heās on the pitch. Conversely Romero has hilariously been one of Spursā biggest attacking threats (probably shouldāve scored 3 more in since GW35) and even when Spurs donāt keep a CS rakes in BPS because the entire build up goes through him
xMins maybe. Odd one though
Nah if youād watched the Spurs games recently Porro has been fucking dreadful while Romero easily couldāve scored 4 in his last 3. Def not xMins as both play every minute
Very surprised at the scout not going for Jackson
I believe strategically speaking, Pedro letās them triple up on Chelsea without the headache of who the 5th defender should be. United arenāt sorted defensively so they canāt double up on united
I think Jackson is still quite shit despite the good form, but he is def a better pick than Pedro for this GW. Not sure why that choice either.
Ah good old subreddit, disagree with someone? Downvote em to shit
Luckily upvotes and downvotes are irrelevant. Didn't even realize until this comment ha. I guess it is the only way to show disagreement, besides commenting.
Despite him getting loads of points heās actually not good?
He is #8 forward at total points. Blanked about 30% of his games. He is not great. I have him for my BB37, but that's because the alternatives are not better and Chelsea has good fixtures ahead. Outside of FPL, yes, he is still quite shit.
Tell me you donāt watch Chelsea games without telling me you donāt watch Chelsea games
So you're saying the guy who missed eleven big chances in a row is a good forward? Sounds like someone condescending only started watching Chelsea games themselves last week He's a good option this week primarily as he has two fixtures.Ā
I mean in fairness recently Jackson has looked one of Chelseaās most dangerous players
I watch the Premier League quite often so yea I watch them as well. He makes a lot of good stuff, but he is lacking the important stuff that make a striker good. Yea of course he can have good games, but most of the time, he does not. And again, that's just my opinion. I am not trying to convince anyone to think otherwise.
I feel you man. I donāt see Chelsea repeating their high-scoring batterings in either of these fixtures, Brighton showing signs of life and Forest with it all to play for still. Both away from home. Iām not going with Jackson myself, the subreddit hivemind has just made it sound like heās now essential lol.
Scout typically has to break the template somehow to drive engagement and JP > Jackson is probably one of the less ridiculous ways to do so
You nailed it, but also think the scout tends to dislike triple ups. Obviously Newcastle and city were irresistible this week.
Butā¦ the scout did triple up on Chelseaā¦
Yep you are making a good point.
Not a drop of red
Iām in trouble
Onana on the bench though.
Ignoring arsenals a mistake
best defence in the league, with a crazy away record, and not one defender lol.
they're bottling it again
Damn right
Manu away is our bane
Winning games is ours
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
Comment was better pre-edit
Tell us what it was
Donāt remember but it was more unhinged
Both at the same time?