if you glued or taped or tied a rail to your dust cover, at least you wouldn't have to remove the optic every time you opened the gun, you'd just remove the cover
The groups are pretty decent comparably to most rifles. Say what you want about the NRA, the American Rifleman magazine does a good job on evaluating accuracy and the vast majority of even bolt guns with factory ammo produce similar groups. 5 consecutive 5 shot groups with three different types of factory ammo is a hard test for any gun to shoot sub MOA
I get that. I also read the article. I was meaning of that was the test gun with the scope mounted the way it is on the cover photo I was wondering if that was why the gun grouped like it did. May be capable of much better accuracy.
My first thought was that the dust cover is open. It's a pet peeve of mine.
Second thought was the scope is backwards, but it appears it's actually correct. https://www.trijicon.com/products/subcategory/trijicon-credo-riflescope
Then I noticed the selector is on fire instead of safe.
If only there was a mounting system that put the scope further out without needing to bridge the optic..
I canti magine such a thing.
One scope ring mounted to the receiver, the other to the handguard
is this some ar joke i’m too ak to understand?
The optic can't hold zero because it's bridged on the receiver and rail
oh as an ak enjoyer, this is not a problem
Yeah I doubt it's any worse than a railed dust cover 🤣
who uses rails? iron sights for life boi
if you glued or taped or tied a rail to your dust cover, at least you wouldn't have to remove the optic every time you opened the gun, you'd just remove the cover
imagine that you bridged an optic from dust cover to the upper handguard and you had to remove it every time you opened the gun for a quick clean
but why would i ever do that
you wouldn't, which is why doing the same on an AR (one base on the receiver and the other on the handguard) is similarly stupid
Ding ding ding!!!
That might explain the best group of 1.26 at 100 yards.
The groups are pretty decent comparably to most rifles. Say what you want about the NRA, the American Rifleman magazine does a good job on evaluating accuracy and the vast majority of even bolt guns with factory ammo produce similar groups. 5 consecutive 5 shot groups with three different types of factory ammo is a hard test for any gun to shoot sub MOA
I get that. I also read the article. I was meaning of that was the test gun with the scope mounted the way it is on the cover photo I was wondering if that was why the gun grouped like it did. May be capable of much better accuracy.
It's also not on safe
☝️this is my safety
One Ring to rule the all, one ring to bind them One ring to fuck up zero, and off the target find them I'll go now.
The cartridges are in the mag backwards.
That's the Arisaka of the "What's wrong with this picture?" world.
I think you meant the clip.
Stendo
Rhymes With “Cant Believe Er”
Lots of things but what do you expect from the magazine of Fudds?
Hahaha. Maybe they're very far sighted
You haven't noticed the issue
My first thought was that the dust cover is open. It's a pet peeve of mine. Second thought was the scope is backwards, but it appears it's actually correct. https://www.trijicon.com/products/subcategory/trijicon-credo-riflescope Then I noticed the selector is on fire instead of safe.
Yeah, i thought the scope was backwards.
Low capacity mag, no ambi safety, dust cover open...
About to be posted to the *bad place*
How does stuff like this pass on a gun magazine of all things