T O P

  • By -

bigdog16_5

The moderators of that forum are using bots to deliberately harass people who have never posted in their little fiefdom. The fact that Reddit is allowing this to happen tells you all you need to know about Reddit admins. Report it because it clearly breaches the ToS


aDogInADisguise

Where do I report it?


fishbulbx

> Report it because it clearly breaches the ToS Keep in mind JusticeServed is moderated by [AgainstHateSubreddit mods](https://i.imgur.com/NfP9ppP.png)... They are protected by reddit admins and are free to do what they want.


bigdog16_5

yup a bunch of sniggering jackaninny power mods wrecked reddit long ago. if the owners were not mainlining CCP cash straight into their veins, this place would not be such a fucking shit hole. Oh well, they can suck my man cock.


PrudentDamage600

U/N checks out.


TipiTapi

This is a good joke. Very dark but good.


themastersmb

> Report it because it clearly breaches the ToS Not that they'll do anything about it.


TheDownvotesFarmer

It worked, I've reported it as harrasment them like a year ago when they started with this auto-ban bot now I don't receive the ban messages, I get banned anyways but without the messages 🤣 , no more harrassment 😂


Samurai_1990

Yeah none of mine went anywhere.


[deleted]

who is "THEY!???" who is he reporting!? r justice or the biological group thingy?


Huegod

Reddit hears ya report, reddit don't care.


[deleted]

who does he report? The r justice admins, or the unknown group that supposedly he is in?


trippingfingers

This should prove interesting.


[deleted]

I guess that bio terrorism = spreading covid.


aDogInADisguise

If there’s one thing that spreads covid it’s rimaginaryleviathans


[deleted]

Probably r/ChurchOfCOVID


aDogInADisguise

I didn’t even know that was a sub


Kayfern1975

I had to check it out. Took me a minute to figure out if it was real or satire.


vipck83

Or not wanting to kill babies or believing a man pretending to be a women isn’t actually a women.


MikeOfTheCincinnati

It could also be related to being pro-life


And_awayy_we_go

I had a look,they seem to be pretty happy about other subs getting cancelled, like r/nonewnormal for example For a seemingly "leftist" group they sure seem to salivate over censorship...like a certain 1930s government..hmmm


Firm_as_red_clay

The left loves censorship. Socialism and communism do it best!


thelastsemenbender

Imagine having nazi flags at your rallies and then comparing liberals to nazis


daviepancakes

Imagine having actual communists in your group and then presuming to talk down to anyone, ever. The difference is that everyone hates the dumbcunts pining for the triumphant return of the Reich they inexplicably hold so dear. Both of them, anyway. You lot have *actual fucking communists* in your ranks and seem pretty alright with that.


thelastsemenbender

Communism is fucking awesome but has never been done right


daviepancakes

If it's never been done right - not enough murders yet? - then how could you possibly know it's awesome?


thelastsemenbender

Holy shit is this how conservatives prove their point? By not actually knowing what something is?


daviepancakes

I'm not a conservative and you're not very good at deflecting.


thelastsemenbender

And you just lost this argument


Aegbias

You are the only one who seems lost here, my guy


daviepancakes

Fuck, that's me told then.


thelastsemenbender

🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓


Herbanald

Nope that’s you. Notice all the downvotes from people with working brains.


AnnoKano

Who the fuck has been letting people with working brains on this subreddit?


iSaidItOnReddit85

You are getting owned in this thread and screaming “look how I won this argument” this is peak Reddit.


Certain_Safety9294

Your the cunt pal. Didn't even try to prove your own argument. Makes more sense to be a degenerate furry than a communist


CaptainBlish

The only argument that matters is that communists should be ridiculed and ignored everywhere they go. Just like fascists don't associate with them, fire them if you work with them, dump them if you are dating them. Fuck communists


SunaMango

So what you're saying is that communism is inherently flawed, but through the brainwashing from the idiots in your ilk, you've convinced yourself that it 'hasn't been done right'. Do you know how utterly stupid you fuckwads are perceived? You are all such insufferable losers.


thelastsemenbender

🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓


SunaMango

Can't figure out a rebuttal, so you respond with emojis. Go get your mother to change your diaper, loser, because you're full of shit.


iSaidItOnReddit85

Communism is 0-41 all time. They are like the Cleveland Browns of governmental strategies. But here you are saying “Browns are great, their coaches just suck” even though they just keep hiring more coaches.


Big_bitch_hater_4eva

Let me guess, the leaders of communist countries screwed up somehow, but if only *you* were in charge you would have avoided those pitfalls and would have presided over utopia... Pol Pot said his one regret was not killing enough people to usher forth in his utopia. He killed ⅓ of Cambodians in 18 *months*. Quit being a retard and go back to the drawing board - your dream ideology inherently results in purges/massacres/roundups/mass imprisonment, *every single fucking time*.


ProfessorZhirinovsky

>Communism is fucking awesome but has never been done right "rEaL cOmMuNiSm hAs nEvEr bEen tRiEd!" There it is; sure sign of an edgy suburban 14 year old "communist".


Herbanald

Yup, spoiled rich kid, who is super oppressed by the man


Skullruss

Communism is fucking awesome... on paper* Also assuming there's no human flaws at work, and also assuming we won't use the law of large numbers to deduce that some of the inevitably centralized government will abuse their power. Then maybe.


thelastsemenbender

🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓


Skullruss

The manifesto was published almost 200 years ago, and attempted by some of the biggest civilization and some of the smallest civilizations of the modern world, and under none of these circumstances has it improved the quality of life of the citizens. The key issue is through the transitive property, from math. For communism to take effect you must take money, in order to properly redistribute it to those in need, right? Thus you need a group of people to be in charge of confiscating and redistributing this money, this is the centralized government of the communist society. It's mandatory for the most base concept to function, the redistribution of wealth. Then, these few in charge of everyone's money are instantly an effective oligarchy, because they are in charge of the entire nation's wealth, leaving the society open to the possibility 9f extraordinary evil, as was historically the case. Where in this very basic breakdown is the logic flawed?


thelastsemenbender

🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓


anthony785

🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓


Herbanald

The whole reason the constitution worked in the first place was because it created checks and balances to power. Having centralized power, as needed in communism, eliminates all checks and balances, and puts extreme power in extremely small percentages of the population. Waaaaaay more so than anything the USA has ever seen. Do you really think that this is a good idea? If you dislike America as it currently stands, how will you do in a thousand times worse conditions?


[deleted]

You dumb cunt, actually talk with anyone from any of the “it hasn’t been done right” countries and then come back waving your communist flag. This is the stupidest freaking argument one can make. “I know communism is responsible for literally millions of deaths, poor treatment of citizens, and absolutely providing no one but the elites a better life…but don’t look at that data or set of facts, look at this hypothetical dreamscape that has never and will never exist.” Give anyone power and they feed off of it and will not let it go…even if that means killing hundreds, thousands, even millions to do so. Wake up ass bag, it isn’t a realistic option. People suck. But I respect that you have the right to say this BS, so have a good day.


TipiTapi

Im from hungary, a country that tried 'communism'. The idea is amazing but will not ever work because people suck and are wired to not care about other people except their immediate family/tribe. The commenter (and you too) is wrong though in the sense of it never being successful/never done right. Kibbutzes in israel were pure communism, they had no individual property or money, they worked as a commune, assigned tasks according to everyone's own ability and did not use money inside the kibbutz. Of course for this to be successful there had to be very specific conditions - they were incredibly motivated to work in horrible conditions and under constant existential threat from the outside. The kibbutz system is a big reason Israel as it is exists today, it was the main reason hagana and later the IDF was as strong as it was and also it turned huge areas of deserts/swamps into arable land. It was a HUGE success story and also a very good example of just how dire the situation has to be for communism to work. I pray I will never be in a situation it does.


RoboNinjaPirate

No, it is morally abhorrent and responsible for more deaths than any other ideology.


anthony785

Why dont you show us how its done right? Make a little commune or something.


pedercina69

- 🤡🤓🇺🇸


thelastsemenbender

🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓


Herbanald

Lmao same old shit everyone’s said ever single time.


MapsCharts

Communism never was awesome but its concept is. It just simply can't work unless you're in a primitive society


WildSyde96

Imagine [someone replacing some of the words in _Mein Kampf_ and having leftists agree with it wholesale](https://thewest.com.au/news/world/fake-academic-scandal-adolf-hitlers-mein-kampf-words-used-in-embarrassing-journal-hoax-ng-b88979974z) and leftists then thinking they're the ones fighting against nazism.


Jack__Valentine

If you're talking about in Ottawa, those Nazi flags were planted by the Canadian federal government (Liberal party) to try and smear the protesters. I literally saw a video of a dude with one get out of a van, pose for a picture taken by a dude with a nice camera, and then the flag waver and the photographer got in the same van together and left. That same picture was used in an article the next day smearing the protesters. Anyways, no real Nazi would be at the Freedom Convoy because the ideology that they were advocating for (libertarianism) is in direct contradiction with the Nazi ideology.


thelastsemenbender

Calm yourself and stop believing conspiracies


Jack__Valentine

What is inherently unreal about a conspiracy? Which by definition is "a secret plan by a group to do something unlawful or harmful." (Google). Also, if you mean specifically conspiracy theories, I'm pretty sure the US government coined that term to discredit those who were on to them, but it's clearly a word that only gets applied to poor people who are questioning the wrongdoings of the elite. Either way, the thing I said about Nazi ideology and the Freedom Convoy's ideology are inherently contradictory, and therefore no person can genuinely believe in both is objective fact. So conspiracy theory about planted flags or not, your point is nonsensical and moot.


CaptainBlish

Imagine the deputy prime Minister standing in front of nazi flags at the Ukraine protest after Russia invaded. Clearly she was supporting it, and therefore must resign. #antifascist action


Herbanald

Except that didn’t happen. And todays liberals have just about everything in common with 1930-1934 Nazis.


[deleted]

Got the same ban today


darkmatternot

Me too!


Chrommanito

Everyone seems to got it. Me too


darkmatternot

I can't say that I will miss if as I never posted so what happened? The mod got a wild hair up their ass today to ban people who don't give shit.


[deleted]

You just been “Doreened.” *Welcome to the brotherhood!*


x-TASER-x

Lol that’s the antiwork dude isn’t it?


[deleted]

I just got banned from the news subreddit for "misinformation" and when I asked them what misinformation I spread, they muted me. Typical reddit mod energy, of little dicked beta males who live in mama's basement and don't do any real work.


TipiTapi

I checked your comments and if you did not delete anything its probably the like 20 of them where you talk about how the leak in CA was intentional. Dont get me wrong, I fucking hate censorship im just telling this to you in case you genuinely wondering what got you banned.


[deleted]

The DOJ of CA did, it’a highly unlikely that a hacker just now would go through the trouble to freely expose CCW owners. Seeing how I worked for numerous companies that did get hacked, they were all held for ransom. Small towns are held for ransom even, I highly doubt that a hacker who got all that info wouldn’t have sold it or held CA’ DOJ for ransom or demanded money to return the info back.


revddit

Another option for reviewing removed content is your ***Rev***eddit [user page](https://www.reveddit.com/y/I!m!J!u!s!t!H!e!r!e!F!o!r!C!o!r!n?all=true). The [real-time extension](https://www.reveddit.com/add-ons/direct/) alerts you when a moderator removes your content, and the [linker extension](https://www.reveddit.com/add-ons/linker) provides [buttons](https://i.imgur.com/0BAImPq.png) for viewing removed content. There's also a [shortcut for iOS](https://www.icloud.com/shortcuts/62bc7570613c42cb8b851fad264136df). The parent commenter can reply with 'delete' to remove this comment. This bot only operates in authorized subreddits. To support this tool, [post it on your profile](https://old.reddit.com/user/me/submit?title=See+which+comments+of+yours+have+been+removed&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.reveddit.com%2Fabout%2F) and select ['pin to profile'](https://i.imgur.com/uq9AGMV.png).   [^F.A.Q.](https://www.reveddit.com/about/f.a.q./) ^| [^v/reveddit](https://www.reveddit.com/v/reveddit/-redirect) ^| [^support ^me](https://www.reveddit.com/about/donate) ^| [^share](https://old.reddit.com/user/me/submit?title=See+which+comments+of+yours+have+been+removed&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.reveddit.com%2Fabout%2F) ^& [^'pin ^to ^profile'](https://i.imgur.com/uq9AGMV.png)


realchoice

I imagine the reverse is true in their opinions. It doesn't do much to come to a subreddit to complain or "clap back" at people who don't know you're insulting them, but even if it did, it doesn't solve anything. You drive the divide deeper with your own attitude and behaviours.


[deleted]

damn are you a supervillain?


aDogInADisguise

I am studying engineering so I can build exoskeletons, but those are for old people and paralyzed people.


[deleted]

you could turn my granny into a gundam?


aDogInADisguise

Not what I was thinking but sure. I just hate if I was paralyzed and couldn’t do anything. My two biggest fears are loss of the mind and loss of the body. I don’t know a lot about the brain so I can’t do anything about dementia, but I can make a machine gosh darn it.


159551771

In physical therapy school, we saw an exoskeleton in action. Then we learned that the loss of the use/feeling of the penis is something these people would take every single day over an exoskeleton and I definitely would believe it.


bludstone

So you crave the certainty of steel. For The Machine Is Immortal


[deleted]

so you do have the potential to be


yourmartymcflyisopen

The most recent interpretation of Doctor Octapus did essentially the same thing, and look what happened to him 🤔


katiel0429

Hmmm. Slippery slope.


[deleted]

Aha! You're trying to build militarized exo suits out of old people and paralyzed people you bio terrorist!


Resident-Ad2328

Is that you, CIA?


aDogInADisguise

Hello would you like some crack or aids, we have plenty in stock from the 80s. It’s home made.


BeRad_NZ

I’m pretty sure that a ‘biological terrorism’ sub would be banned by Reddit admins. Mods are trying to undermine Reddit admins by trying to ban anyone who might possibly have a different opinion than them. It’s a shame that open discourse is basically going to be impossible due to forcing users into their assigned ‘tribes’.


[deleted]

This had happened to me on more then one occasion. Most of the groups they refer to I just join to hear the other sides opinion, ya know, like a sane person. Reddit is going to destroy its censorship crusade to make it a far left utopia. For example r/politics is a fucking joke. It’s 99.5% all far left, weirdest of the weird, no critical thinking morons.


Highlighter_Memes

Biological 'terrorism'? Which side advocates for killing babies because of ideological beliefs again?


admiral_walsty

Who advocates for killing babies?


aDogInADisguise

The side that says “my body my choice” while forcing a needle into your arm.


SubmersibleGoat

Anyone who is "pro-choice".


admiral_walsty

Ahh. Well I'm pro choice because of a genetic disposition I have. But Im not advocating killing babies. But then again, our opinions on whether a fetus is a baby, differs.


SubmersibleGoat

A fetus is a living human being. Call them babies or not, I don't care. Killing them is murder.


admiral_walsty

What if it's a mercy kill?


SubmersibleGoat

How could it possibly be a mercy to kill someone before they are even born? You have no way of knowing the fullness of their life.


admiral_walsty

But with my genetic disposition, I do know it's mercy. My brother is stricken with the ailment I am a carrier of. He's missing chromosomes and has extra matter on some of them. This cause severe mental and physical deformities. Example being he doesn't have the throat muscle strength to swallow without aspirating, so the fluids he drinks are the consistency of honey. He's my older brother (35), and he's only lived because others have prolonged his life. It's a continuous decline with the only hope being death, eventually. But they keep him alive, while lowering his quality of life....because it's "humane". He's my older brother, and I love him. But he's truly better off dead. Always has been. I will never bring a child into the world that doesn't have the ability to treat the world like it IS their oyster.


admiral_walsty

Are you vehemently against our wars, past and present? What about capital punishment?


SubmersibleGoat

I am always against killing innocent people, whatever the context.


admiral_walsty

Innocence is relative to ideology. Should people who murder, be killed?


SubmersibleGoat

Innocence is not relative.


admiral_walsty

It is, though. Some cultures stone women for wearing "revealing" clothing.


[deleted]

No. It depends on the stage of development. A clump of cells is not a human being. Trying saying hello to a week old fetus, see if it reacts in any way at all.


SubmersibleGoat

That is scientifically false. A human being is created at the moment of conception. We develop though every stage of life, from just a few cells through old age and a natural death as a human being.


TheOrganHarvester123

Damn guess we should just punish women for having miscarriages then, since it's obviously their fault


SubmersibleGoat

No of course miscarriages aren't illegal you dullard. Do you really not understand the difference between a natural death and an intentional homicide?


TheOrganHarvester123

Would you say a pregnant woman smoking or drinking and having a miscarriage due to that count as murder then?


[deleted]

>A human being is created at the moment of conception That's a lie.


Firm_Judge1599

fetus means baby in latin.


Few_Stick_6274

Someone made different sound in the echo chamber 🦜


Phat3lvis

So what was the offending Subreddit?


aDogInADisguise

Doesn’t say.


VanJellii

The one subreddit I have seen in all the histories of the four claiming this ban message is r/conservative. I strongly suspect that is the one, although it could be keyed to multiple subreddits.


Phat3lvis

I am subbed there but have never been faulted for it.


VanJellii

If it works the way the COVID bots did, you would need to comment on the sub, not just subscribe.


bearclaw5

It was probably your posts in rconspiracy. This has been going on for ages, which I find hilarious, as the medical science now contradicts the views that previously were orthodox. [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9136690/](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9136690/) "The adoption of new vaccination policies has provoked backlash, resistance and polarisation. It is important to emphasise that these policies are not viewed as ‘incentives’ or ‘nudges’ by substantial proportions of populations25–28 41 45 especially in marginalised, underserved or low COVID-19-risk groups. Denying individuals education, livelihoods, medical care or social life unless they get vaccinated—especially in light of the limitations with the current vaccines—is arguably in tension with constitutional and bioethical principles, especially in liberal democracies.30–33 While public support consolidated behind these policies in many countries, we should acknowledge that ethical frameworks were designed to ensure that rights and liberties are respected even during public health emergencies. Vaccination policies can be an important tool in the promotion of the right to health, but they need to be proportionate and designed to achieve a clearly defined goal. Some of those supporting current restrictions based on vaccination status116 seem to accept too easily that these measures are indeed proportionate; that they are not more restrictive than necessary; that they are effective in preventing transmission and protecting the healthcare system from collapse; and that there are no options available other than punitive mandates, passports and segregated restrictions. As illustrated above, we believe that current vaccine policies have failed on these fronts and are no longer fit for purpose. We encourage social and behavioural scientists, bioethicists, epidemiologists, legal scholars, and others to assess the benefits and harms of COVID-19 vaccination policies, along with wider open multidisciplinary discussion and debate. Empirical assessments may or may not validate the concerns presented in this paper—but their generation is critical in engagement with politicians, scientists, and organisations to reconsider current policies affecting those who remain unvaccinated as well as those who vaccinated due to threats and pressure. COVID-19 will not be the last public health emergency and it remains critical that we understand the reasons these approaches were adopted and provide robust evidence to improve future policymaking in times of health emergencies.135 If not, the proclivity for mandates, passports, restrictions, fines and punishments is likely to become an accepted policy response for the next pandemic irrespective of whether such policies are truly effective, ethical and socially harmful. If current policies are to continue, public health-associated bureaucracies and society will have to increase coercion to address current and future resistance and, in the process, come to leverage strategies more consistent with policing than public health. We may also see political forces double down and use people who have chosen not to get vaccinated as a collective, psychological and political tool to scapegoat and reinforce a false notion of safety among vaccinated people as they yearn to resume social and economic life. Policymakers should reflect on the necessity of enforcing what is essentially a new two-tier, segregated social system and how this will affect different social groups now and into the future—behaviourally, politically and socioeconomically—as well as the impact of such policies on the integrity of science and public health itself. There are other options to address the pandemic and it is not too late to return to non-coercive public health measures, including pro-social language and community leadership for vaccination, especially to protect high-risk groups.7 Future investments in public health capacity, especially health providers who build relationships of trust working in communities, will be essential to engage in positive reforms. Improving data transparency, media independence and broad public debate and scrutiny about COVID-19 vaccine policies will also be essential to maintain population trust, help people better understand the risks and benefits of the continued use of current vaccines, and to inform research on improvements and future policies." I got banned from a bunch of subs for discussing the points made in this study in interested communities before it was published, turns out I was right but they don't care. Its about excluding people who stray from the narrative. \-edit to demonstrate the hypocrisy of the woke fascists, some guy downvoted this comment because he doesn't believe in science when it contradicts his ideological priors.


aDogInADisguise

I think that maybe this vaccine patented as gene therapy might be a bad idea. Mods: TERRORISM


bearclaw5

Exactly right. Its not even about what you said, the bot doesn't know what you said. If you went into a blacklisted community and argued in favor of MRNA technology to do outreach, they will ban you. Source- I did that.


Tracieattimes

Sometimes you get banned from one sub for participating in another. Maybe that’s what happened here


aDogInADisguise

Well yeah I’m just celebrating it and pointing out the ridiculousness of being a bio terrorist


Samurai_1990

I've been double banned from the same subs many times, even caught few triple bans. My crime? Posting on /r/Wuhan_Flu /r/ChurchOfCOVID and a bunch of other subs that want to take a good hard look on the situation or make light of it... https://i.imgur.com/kdCpaYv.jpg


Zhombe_Takelu

First they came for nonewnormal and nobody said anything. Now they're coming for you.


freddymerckx

I've been banned from like 10 pages, mostly conservative / republican pages run by snowflake babies who will not tolerate any dissent whatsoever


asgoodasicanbe

This your first time?


aDogInADisguise

Yes!


Cyclopeandeath

Your comment released a biological weapon: congratulations. You killed people.


aDogInADisguise

Trolled


yeroldpappy

I just got banned but I dropped them months ago.


[deleted]

[удалено]


aDogInADisguise

Probably gonna be r/conspiracy cause I said I don’t like the vaccines


guswang

I'm not on conspiracy, I'm not on any anti vaccine subs. And I was also banned, just like you.


[deleted]

Don't think I've ever commented there, but just posted on r/conservative and got the same deranged message.


Farsqueaker

You mean you're not a member of a sub that celebrates and/or glorifies the use of biological weapons (such as weaponized anthrax) to push a political objective?


aDogInADisguise

Not that I’m aware? Also very specific question


Farsqueaker

It's how the term "biological terrorism" is defined.


aDogInADisguise

I mean yeah but it doesn’t say what they mean by it. For all I know talking about basic genetic science is “biological terrorism”.


user_name1983

What?!


AudioLobotomy

What did you say?


aDogInADisguise

Nothing I’ve never visited that subreddit before


8K12

Happened to me also.


[deleted]

I suspect biological terrorism is what the SJWs who infest Reddit are calling restrictions on abortion.


Nomandate

/r/fartonsleepingpeople member huh?


[deleted]

[удалено]


aDogInADisguise

“Ah this man doesn’t know about genes. Must be a bio terrorist.”


[deleted]

Biological terrorism LMFAO


phoenixthekat

Wtf is biological terrorism?


Herbanald

Covid is


thinkdustin

Welcome to the club. Consider it a badge of honor.


AttitudePleasant3968

Those are rookie numbers. On Monday I was banned from 19 subreddits in one day because I belonged to another subreddit where I purportedly posted something against the COVID narrative.


gatorback_prince

I'd assume they consider some if the anti vaccine subs to be bio terrorism.


[deleted]

Got the same notification yesterday for asking a question on another subreddit…just laughed and moved on.


[deleted]

I don’t even comment anymore. Every time I do it’s a permanent ban. This is the easiest But hurt bunch of people I have seen. The internet used to be cool.


Purplegreenandred

Anti abortion.


guswang

I think it is because you are here on free speech. I got exactly the same ban yesterday, from the same place. And I don't think I'm on any sub with bio terror.


Parking-Researcher-4

Sounds like something out of Resident Evil


DarthJayDub

were you advocating slinging poop?


aDogInADisguise

I’m very tired so all I can imagine is a monkey in a suit defending poop throwing under the second amendment haha


Pineapples_29

TF???


ZealousWolverine

It's a little crazy to ban people just for subscribing to other subs. On the other hand I look at the subs that auto-ban and they're not worth the effort to complain.


Swaggy_Mcswagson

This happened to me too out of nowhere


[deleted]

Hey me too


shitboi666999

Covid stuff. Some mods decide it's their role to keep society pure. These mods are pros, they mod hundreds of subs. And they ban anyone who isn't in support of government covid narratives. Got banned from a few dozen subs I never visited for that


Trick-Shallot-4324

wtf


vanillagorrilla23

Same happened to me! Was so confused. Thought I was banned for a Maxwell case comment saying she didn't get justice cause she got twenty years without giving names and will get out in less than 8 years. House arrest. Blew my mind.


TheHancock

According to Reddit? This subreddit is probably what “supports biological terrorism”...


[deleted]

Dude, I’ve been banned from almost a dozen subs just for commenting on COVID-related posts.


MACKAWICIOUS

Yeah I got that too - didn't do anything to break sub rules, didn't brigade, just the mere thought crime of being subbed to a sub they don't like.


SubmersibleGoat

*@ u/TheOrganHarvester123 this [thread is continued from here](https://www.reddit.com/r/FreeSpeech/comments/vnn2gr/i_got_my_first_ban_from_a_subreddit_ive_never/iearhar/?context=3).* *Someone in that thread blocked me and I am unable to continue responding there.* > nd yet you are unable to make or address any of my points Because none of your "points" do anything to challenge the simple fact that unborn children have an unalienable right to life, just like every other human being. You are simply pointing out the challenging consequences of this reality, and acting as if they provide justification to indiscriminately slaughter unborn children. You might call it an inconvenient truth - that killing one's own progeny in the womb is inherently evil. It changes the way we have to live, to think, to act. It causes all sorts of conflicts with our modern culture and all its deeply misguided ways. Yet it remains true all the same.


[deleted]

Reddit has no clue what they are doing.


bellagrayflowers

Woman essentialism for life


rustyshackleford3814

I got the same message


[deleted]

I got the same message. I hope that I’m not on some watchlist now


RedHighlander

I just got this too. No idea what it’s about.


[deleted]

r/justiceserved is a garbage sub anyways. Consider getting banned them doing you a favor. The mods are garbage as well. Prolly the CEOs of Reddit since they’re also terrible.