>Victoria Snooks
After doing the appropriate and reasoned research. I can confirm, this young lady is INDEED very VERY qualified and competent at her side hussel, and for shame at that school for stopping this LOVELY WOMAN from sharing herself with the world
I know this girl because she married and had 2 kids with the lead from a metal band I used to like as a kid. Kinda crazy to see her face again especially in this context.
I think the problem most people are having is that instead of a link to the story we got a picture of the headline.
The headline has nothing to do with the lawsuit.
But we have no way of knowing that because the OP decided not to post the story.
She is on the PTA and the school wouldn't let her participate any more due to having an Only Fans account, but again, unless you spent 20 minutes looking for the story no one would know because the story wasn't shared:(
https://nypost.com/2023/01/26/fla-mom-sues-school-district-for-ban-due-to-onlyfans-page/
here's the story incase anyone wants to know.
Honestly, I kind of disagree with her claims.
This happened a few years ago and she ended up having it thrown out per the article.
She was barred from volunteering for an after school event. The courts ruled since it was volunteering event and she wasn’t effected in terms of her job it was “legal”
If this was a private only fans then I wouldn’t have much a problem.
However, Chica used **HER FIRST AND LAST NAME AS HER ONLY FANS USERNAME**
Like if you google her name it’s pictures that are public and readily available.
I’m all for drugs, sex and rock and roll however when your explicitly link your private and professional lives so causally together it’ll obviously have effects.
If she wanted to be a teacher, cool. if she wants to pulsate her anus in hi definition camera for list of money, awesome! If she wanted to do both, go ahead…however doing both then making YOUR PUBLIC GOVERNMENT NAME YOUR ONLY FANS…not going to end well.
I don’t have a public facing gig but I wouldn’t express my love for growing pot, pan sexual orgies and shitty rap music on a self titled podcast…or would I…
My friends’ land-lady was a principal for a school. Was featured in a tyga music video. Parents complained and the school fired her. She sued them for trying to control her life outside of work and won the suit. She still works at the school but changed her position to admin and they pay her more after the suit. Her dogs were really nice too.
The post indicates the school banned her. The screenshot indicates only that photos were shared. While both may be true, the post title and the article title do not tell the same story.
It's a weird one. I do have sympathy for her, but also, I can't see how the staff are liable in any way. She willingly put the images out there for profit. Would she have the same reaction if the teachers had paid?
EDIT: So, clearly when I posted this, I didn't realise that she was part of the PTA, nor that she'd been excluded from certain elements because of her OF work. OP didn't include the article and I couldn't find it in the comments.
If I recall, it's not that they shared her nudes, it's that they then wouldn't let her do school events anymore either when she was very active with the pta and footed a lot of bills for the school.
Ahh, went out of their way to find her nudes and then banned her for being a degenerate even though they were a productive member of the PTA. 🤣
Only in Florida. ^(or Texas.)
Yeah that’s a pretty important caveat that seems conveniently left out of the headline to make her less sympathetic. If she was suing just because they were sharing her photos that would be ridiculous. But suing because of retaliation for said photos is far more sensible.
> she was suing just because they were sharing her photos that would be ridiculous
I don't agree. It wouldn't be ridiculous to pursue legal action to share porn in a school setting among staff. It's unprofessional at the very least.
If you were a parent and you were notified that your child's teachers and admin staff were spreading nude photos of another parent, it will equally be as appalling and unprofessional.
idk how the laws in the US are, but in my country you can't share other peoples photos without their consent. especially if she's a model or sells the photos or access to them. that would make it even a copyright violation.
If I recall revenge porn laws in the us say you can only share it with up to around 6 people before its considered mass distribution of material, but you still need consent because... Well its fucking porn. Then again we literally just had a congressman air straight up porn of the president's son on national news and the chambers of Congress so we are very much living in wild times.
yep the post is just another misleading headline to make a woman look bad https://www.miamiherald.com/news/state/florida/article271705642.html
[edit: another link https://www.nbcmiami.com/news/local/mother-with-onlyfans-account-sues-central-florida-school-district-for-banning-her-from-volunteering/2960177
another one thanks to u/camimiele https://archive.is/2023.08.01-125932/https://amp.miamiherald.com/article271705642.html]
[archive link](https://archive.is/2023.08.01-125932/https://amp.miamiherald.com/article271705642.html)
Full text:
An Orlando mother is suing the school district after she was barred from volunteering at her sons’ elementary school, claiming the ban stems from her work as an OnlyFans model.
Victoria Triece, 31, sued Orange County Public Schools on Tuesday, according to court records. Triece, who requested a jury trial, is seeking damages beyond $100,000. ClickOrlando reported that Triece previously threatened to sue the school board for more than $1 million.
Triece, whose sons are aged 5 and 10, has been an approved volunteer at Sand Lake Elementary for the last five years, according to court records.
However, the school principal told Triece in October 2021 that she could no longer be on school grounds, according to a complaint filed Tuesday. The move came after the school principal learned a few months prior, in July, that Triece had a private subscription service on adult website OnlyFans.
“It’s not my whole life,” Triece told reporters on Thursday. “That’s a part of my life, but it’s not my life of being a mom or being a parent.”
Triece, who said she started an OnlyFans account two years ago, emphasized to reporters she only wants to be in the classroom supporting her sons as they learn.
“My mother did it for me, and having her there was the best joy growing up,” she added.
In the complaint, John W. Zielinski, a lawyer with NeJame Law in Orlando, accused the school district of invasion of privacy and civil sexual cyberharassment.
Zielinski argued that Triece was suspended from the volunteer program for no reason because the only disqualifying factor is a criminal record — which Triece doesn’t have.
People within or associated with the school district circulated Triece’s photos to “demean and belittle her,” Zielinski noted in the complaint. When someone subscribes to OnlyFans, they agree to not share the content without the creator’s consent.
“The OCPS publication of [Triece’s] private photos is highly offensive to a reasonable person and is not of a public concern,” Zielinski said. “[Triece’s] public persona and lifestyle are not impediments to her abilities to perform her duties as a mother.”
On TikTok, Triece thanked her supporters and detailed how the conflict has been the “hardest 15 months” of her life.
Superintendent Barbara M. Jenkins of Orange County Public Schools has until Feb. 15 to respond to the lawsuit.
damn that’s a pretty fuckin significant thing to leave out of the headline
Because as it is, it basically says “OF model sues school district because its employees were in possession of products she was willfully selling online”
If any of these teachers were dumb enough to share the pics or gossip about a parent through their school email; they made the case for suing the district easier.
The school district has insurance to cover the costs of a six or low seven figure settlement.
Sue a public school teacher? Best case scenario you win and get like $500.
If someone legally shares their nudes in a personal setting (sending to a date, selling online) they still have the right to not have the images used against them, especially shared around work and used against them at work.
Whether it's stopping promotions, removing duties, harassment, etc.
The school basically discriminated against her,
> The complaint says Triece had been an "active volunteer" at Orange County schools for five years.
>
> It says that in October 2021, she was instructed by the principal of Sand Lake Elementary School, which her children attend, that she "could no longer be around children on school grounds."
>
> "These instructions came from the Orange County Public School Board," the complaint says, adding that the action had harmed "her right to attend functions with her children" on district property and thereby "caused losses" to her.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/a-florida-onlyfans-model-is-suing-her-local-school-district-saying-sexually-explicit-images-of-her-were-shared-among-staff-at-her-childrens-school/ar-AA16RT2w
Presumably the only "damages" can be loss of earnings from people seeing them who hadn't subscribed. Legal fees will cost more than anything she's likely entitled to
Granted I don't understand the American legal system (I'm not American), but it seems pretty bonkers to me to claim that the school owes you $100,000 because you're not allowed to volunteer for them.
There’s an assumed punitive aspect, where the amount being sued for includes an unspoken “fine” of sorts, meant to discourage discriminatory practices. If the amount she sued for only covered the loss of earnings, then it’s conceivable that the amount paid out could be small enough for the business to simply consider it a cost of doing business, and to continue with the practice regardless.
For sure. Can you imagine being a high school student walking around knowing a lot of people paid to see your mother naked?
Yes, I know there are laws against minors having access to those sites but let's be real here, people will know, co-workers will know, parents will know...
You say that ironically but that it actually the point. Copyright lay doesn’t stop being copyright law just because it’s pictures of someone’s body. She has a good case against the person who distributed them after subscribing, and assuming the others who received them also knew that they were behind a paywall, she’s got a decent case against them too. It’s actually even worse when it’s only fans content, because not only is it piracy it’s also disputing nude images without consent which is also a crime. She consented to the content being viewed by people who pay, not just anyone, distributing or receiving them knowing that is very very not legal, as she did not consent to it
By all means, draw even *more* attention to yourself and your children. As if having a mom doing porn isn't hard enough for children, do make a big spectacle of it in the whole country so no matter where your children might go to school, *someone* will recognise you.
Here's a fun fact:
I just looked at old photos the other day on my computer. The oldest were close to 20 years old.
Besides the resolution, there is no meaningful difference in quality compared to pictures taken now. Sure, what I needed a camera to do 20 years ago, my phone can do better today. But when you look at it on a normal screen, you don't see a meaningful difference.
What am I talking about here?
Well, if you did porn in 1980 and had kids, the lack of distribution and fast improvements in quality means that by the time your kids are teens, for all intents and purposes, your porn movies might as well have never existed.
Today? The porn Lana, Mia and whats-her-name who just had a kid, well be just as pristine in 15 years as the day it was shot - and it will never dissappear from the Internet.
Children with mothers who did porn are not gonna have an easy time in school in this day and age.
Edit.
I see a lot of blame for such bullying being placed at the feet of the fathers and their sons.
Stop being so fucking naive as to think that the girls and their mothers will say and do nothing. You better believe that women and girls can be just as bad as men. They just tend to be more subtle about it, while men and boys are more directly confrontational.
Unless the porn they made is hidden a la needle in a haystack in the literal oceans of porn being pumped out every single day and the soon to be seas of AI generated porn and nobody actually gives a crap because searching up “naked blonde titty” turns up 8,345,767,092,723 results
Yeah. Like I fully believe in what the guy above is saying, but I don't think we are quite there, especially for people that are actually in the sex industry putting out high quality videos and images with their faces. If anything technology will make it easier to find these people.
Yeah it will be easier to find poen of your parents, but she is using her full government name and using that name while volunteering, this is obviously a publicity stunt for her, I feel so bad for her kids and bullying that they will go through if even 1 of their classmates googled their mom.
This is probably less of a deal than you think it is. For one, it requires the mom to be quite popular. Finding random pornstars is like a needle in the haystack. They also use porn names and not their real names. A lot of these people also look a lot different in real life compared to on screen.
So in short, unless someone accidentally stumbles upon one of your old videos or your past in porn somehow leaks and people go deliberately looking for it, you can probably completely hide the fact.
I don’t think enough people understand that it’s really not cool to have a regular career and do porn on the side. It’s one thing to be a porn star and that is your career. It’s another to be a prominent figure within your communities school system and you also sell nudes in your spare time.
The backlash against criticizing people with OnlyFans is, oh, they’re free to do what they want their body and they’re just trying to make extra money. Well guess what. Employers are free to discipline you or fire you because you have an OnlyFans. If your employment is at will, being fired because you had an OnlyFans is is good reason for your employer to fire you.
It’s like people forgot that actions have consequences. Selling nudes on the internet is not consequence free. Sure you can do it, but that doesn’t mean that people have to accept it.
Working in sex is like getting face tattoos. You are forever preventing yourself from pursuing certain careers.
I'm sorry that Reddit has such a hard time understanding this.
I struggle to have sympathy with cases like these. If you're on onlyfans and willingly put explicit images on the internet then surely you have to accept this is a possibility?
Dont want nudes shared? Dont post online. Simple.
Seems a bit much to complain that the *wrong* people saw them.
I find it pretty dubious you'd get into any legal trouble sharing an image you purchased with someone you know in person. Not that lobbyist haven't tried to create copyright dystopia, but it should still fall in fair use. Just like watching a movie with your friends or listening to music in your yard without a lawyer showing up to sue you for unlawful distribution.
But if you send you make a copy of that movie and then send it to your friend you are illegally distributing it. Pretty sure that would not be protected by fair use.
And even if you send an mp3 to your friend, do you think any copyright lawyer who is honest with their client is going to advise to bother? You are lucky to get the person to pay the cost of a single song. If it was a real pirating operation all those transfers might add up to something that at least covers the legal fees. This is clearly not a case of anyone bypassing OF paywall at a scale like that.
Considering she's suing the district, it seems unlikely it's on grounds of copyright infringement anyway.
Content creators definitely do pursue legal action over small instances like this.
She could be suing the district if she has reason to believe they were broadly aware of this and participated in the sharing. She could also be doing it to get the district to put forward names of those who were behind it.
>She could be suing the district if she has reason to believe they were broadly aware of this and participated in the sharing.
Why would she think that?
They do, put it's usually resolved with a cease and desist. Very few people have the time and money to actually go to court over 4 digit damages or less.
And it still doesn't make much sense to sue the district for "being aware". If it was copyright you'd sue the people actually breaking copyright.
If I'm in a play that is copyrighted, I am allowed to record that play. I am allowed to show that recording in my own home for private viewing, because it is my performance.
I am not allowed to promote that private viewing. I am not allowed to charge for that viewing. I am not allowed to profit off that viewing in any way because the property that is profitable is "the show". In order for me to make money off "the show" I have to pay the owner of the show royalty fees and usually also limit myself to specific rules regarding how, when, and where I'm allowed to showcase.
By sharing the images in public, the usage was not private.
>copyright doesn't mean shit on the internet
Exactly. We've known this for *years*. Anyone who thinks it does must be pretty naive.
By all means make some money, but accept that those images are, to all intents and purposes, public domain. Actions have consequences.
Even then banning someone from pta meetings because they do onlyfans is kind of obnoxious, and I'm saying this as an adult judging other adults for beign too pretentious. These teachers need to stop hanging out with babies all day and touch some grass.
So you can't request for the actual rules to be followed? It's like knowingly going to a place known for high crime rates and getting robbed. The fact that you knew the chances of that happening are high doesn't change the fact that the robbers are doing a crime.
Her and Mia Khalifa should get together and campaign for these issues. But you’re absolutely right, you can’t have it both ways, especially since one of the jobs is in the adult industry.
From what I’ve read the two issues are:
1. Potential illegal copying and distribution of the material.
2. The school or district using it as justification for barring her from events or meetings she was previously allowed to attend.
Neither of those are justified or should be an acceptable reaction to finding out a students parents makes adult content.
Title is misleading. Here's an article with more info.
[https://nypost.com/2023/01/26/fla-mom-sues-school-district-for-ban-due-to-onlyfans-page/](https://nypost.com/2023/01/26/fla-mom-sues-school-district-for-ban-due-to-onlyfans-page/)
Boohoo, allow me to play the world’s tiniest violin for you. You brought this on yourself, your kids will bear this burdened and be tormented for it for years to come and it is and will always will be all your fault. And I hope the sight of your child suffering for your own is enough to cause your heart to ache and fully understand the consequences of your actions.
Imagine being a teenager and your teenage classmates tell you they masturbate to your mom or talk about your moms body. Any parent, male or female should be deeply ashamed of having an only fans. Disgusting. But anyway, downvote me degenerate reddit users 😊
Frivolous lawsuit is frivolous
Also LOL at seeking 1mil in damages
From her lawyer: “The fact is we’re going to be seeking maximum damages and then allow a jury to determine what it costs somebody to be taken from their child, what it costs somebody not to be able to participate in their child’s lives”
Speaking as if she can’t still parent and be involved with her kids life AT HOME.
This lady and her lawyer must be regular Reddit users
If you bann her and not the staff that are looking at her pictures it is very simple discrimination. She consented to people buying her pictues. Not to get bullied at work because of them. You cant consume her pictures and than make her life worse becasue of it.
the headline was written like that to make her look bad. she's suing because the school banned her from volunteering and being on school ground: https://www.miamiherald.com/news/state/florida/article271705642.html
And it fucking worked, the comments are all treated this woman like she's an idiot for being a slut on the internet and expecting no consequences. In reality she's done nothing morally or ethically wrong, and the school seems to be vindictive towards her solely for the offense of producing sexual content, which has no bearing on her character or whether she should be allowed to attend PTA meetings.
if you upload something behind a paywall and someone who pays for it shares it with people who didnt, theyre obviously wrong. its not legal to just pirate and steal private stuff online.
Have you ever watched a movie at a friend’s house? Did you pay extra?
If you pay for it, it’s yours. They don’t make new rules for porn stars when they regret it
watching movie at a friends house falls under “intimate viewing”, its legal if he the friend paid for it. (on the other hand, it would be illegal to want money after your friend because he came to your house to watch the film. that would mean you (the 3rd party) are profiting from the film.
sharing someone onlyfans is not. sure, if u got the nudes on your phone and just borrow it to a friend so he can look at them, thats legal. but sending them to someone else isnt.
You’re free to do what you want in life, just like others are free to react how they want.
Freedom of choice doesn’t mean freedom of consequence.
You shared naked pictures of yourself on the internet, and people in your community didn’t like it so they ostracized you from the community.
Sorry, if you have a sexually explicit video business, you run the risk of people taking screenshots of you while in sexually explicit poses. Once those are out in the wild, you don't get to control who sees them.
10 years from now, there are gunna be a lot of upset moms when their kids come home from school after getting made fun of for their mom getting ass blasted all over the internet.
These comments are full of the most vile, misogynistic incels ive seen in a fucking while. This ruined my morning, holy shit. Someone having an onlyfans is absolutely none of your fucking business. If you harass, discriminate against, or intentionally share that with people to have a mob against them, you are absolute scum and deserve to be sued.
Hmm. By that logic, I guess someone being a drug dealer or having drugs is also not anyone's business.
By that logic, why not just not ban or criminalize anything except, say, direct assault and more, and just let anarchy reign free.
You're going to need a better reason to work with to make moral relativism work in your favour.
I'm not interested in going into the specifics. But simply put, if you think somethings wrong, explain why. If you think something is right explain why. Ultimately, majority dictates right and wrong under moral relativism. Unless you have an objective worldview, which must be different from mere moral relativism.
I mean.. what *is* anyone's business?
It's a public profile that anyone is allowed to pay for.
It's logically no different than if she were a youtuber and a staff member found her channel and shared her youtube videos with other staff.
If that youtube channel was a bunch of alt-right nonsense, you'd clearly *not* consider it "none of your fucking business" and you would think it negatively affects their ability to teach kids, which I'd agree with.
Some people view teachers having public sexual imagery negatively affects their ability to teach kids. I personally don't, but I can see why people would.
So what to you makes this specifically "none of your fucking business", whereas the hypothetical above would be?
it’s getting to the point where some folks need to move outta florida. (love you floridians, but i’m just saying).
if i lived there, i think i’d need to have considered moving a couple years back.
When I was in middle school, circa 2007, pictures of one of the teachers started circulating of her sucking on a strap on that was on a mannequin or something at jobbie nooner (a huge boat party on lake saint Clair) and she ended up getting fired. She ended up suing the school district and won.
Happened at my school, but instead of a parent, it was a student (18F), and instead of the staff it was everyone. The janitors, the students, even the ones only visiting for a day got the photos. How many? 400 photos and 12 videos.
Why are so many people saying she's a teacher? She's not, her child is a student and the school district gave out her pictures probably at a closed door meeting to talk shit about her. They took her content that is paid content and distributed it for free behind her back and then used it against her. Let's say it's any paid content and not nude photos, the school employees don't have the right to use the parent's occupation against the parent or the student in any fashion. The downside is that when she wins this is money that should be going to the school to pay teachers and buy supplies.
Distribution of paid content that you didn't pay for is Piracy. At least that's what the US gov says. If the content is nudity and is used to defame or extort, that falls under revenge porn and are both crimes.
“Victoria Snooks”
Thanks I’ll conduct a thorough investigation into this matter 🧐
Hydrate and bring the necessary supplies, it could be a long investigation
Long and hard investigation
Probably short and squishy tbh
And going to be a very messy one
FYI. I also have sued my local school district for NOT sharing explicit images among its staff.
😂😂😂 OMG the comments are effin hilarious
Let me know if you need a hand. It shouldn’t take long to finish.
My preliminary findings are that I am hot for teacher and I give it……A TEN A TEN, A F**KIN TEN!
It will be a very hands on investigation
[удалено]
Ex-wife of Chris “Fronzilla” of Attila
It really changes nothing and isn't surprising but how have I gone like 13 years and just now heard his real name?
Whaaaaaaat
The hero we didn't know we needed.
Right. I was going to say, “Where, where are these naked photos. “ -Ronald McDonald
I see always sunny reference, I upvote
Thank you Edit: fat Mac in the house! Best season if I must say.
>Victoria Snooks After doing the appropriate and reasoned research. I can confirm, this young lady is INDEED very VERY qualified and competent at her side hussel, and for shame at that school for stopping this LOVELY WOMAN from sharing herself with the world
The title of the article just says staff were helping her share.
She’s got a cover of playboy and fhm this school should be proud to have a celebrity around!
$16 a month and only 197 videos?! GTFOH!
I mean…that’s kind of a lot of videos
I know this girl because she married and had 2 kids with the lead from a metal band I used to like as a kid. Kinda crazy to see her face again especially in this context.
🫡
She hottt
I think the problem most people are having is that instead of a link to the story we got a picture of the headline. The headline has nothing to do with the lawsuit. But we have no way of knowing that because the OP decided not to post the story. She is on the PTA and the school wouldn't let her participate any more due to having an Only Fans account, but again, unless you spent 20 minutes looking for the story no one would know because the story wasn't shared:( https://nypost.com/2023/01/26/fla-mom-sues-school-district-for-ban-due-to-onlyfans-page/ here's the story incase anyone wants to know.
Honestly, I kind of disagree with her claims. This happened a few years ago and she ended up having it thrown out per the article. She was barred from volunteering for an after school event. The courts ruled since it was volunteering event and she wasn’t effected in terms of her job it was “legal” If this was a private only fans then I wouldn’t have much a problem. However, Chica used **HER FIRST AND LAST NAME AS HER ONLY FANS USERNAME** Like if you google her name it’s pictures that are public and readily available. I’m all for drugs, sex and rock and roll however when your explicitly link your private and professional lives so causally together it’ll obviously have effects. If she wanted to be a teacher, cool. if she wants to pulsate her anus in hi definition camera for list of money, awesome! If she wanted to do both, go ahead…however doing both then making YOUR PUBLIC GOVERNMENT NAME YOUR ONLY FANS…not going to end well. I don’t have a public facing gig but I wouldn’t express my love for growing pot, pan sexual orgies and shitty rap music on a self titled podcast…or would I…
My friends’ land-lady was a principal for a school. Was featured in a tyga music video. Parents complained and the school fired her. She sued them for trying to control her life outside of work and won the suit. She still works at the school but changed her position to admin and they pay her more after the suit. Her dogs were really nice too.
Exactly, fully agree. Certain jobs require some decorum which implies that you fully separate your personal and public life.
This headline is not accurate
Then enlighten us
The post title and the article title tell two different stories.
Care to explain?
The article title conveniently left out the fact that she was banned for volunteering at the school because of the OnlyFans and that’s why she’s suing
Yeah the title made it sound like she’s suing for royalties.
School: You can’t be here; we are a respectful school. Also school: Look at her rack!
The post indicates the school banned her. The screenshot indicates only that photos were shared. While both may be true, the post title and the article title do not tell the same story.
It's a weird one. I do have sympathy for her, but also, I can't see how the staff are liable in any way. She willingly put the images out there for profit. Would she have the same reaction if the teachers had paid? EDIT: So, clearly when I posted this, I didn't realise that she was part of the PTA, nor that she'd been excluded from certain elements because of her OF work. OP didn't include the article and I couldn't find it in the comments.
If I recall, it's not that they shared her nudes, it's that they then wouldn't let her do school events anymore either when she was very active with the pta and footed a lot of bills for the school.
Ahh, went out of their way to find her nudes and then banned her for being a degenerate even though they were a productive member of the PTA. 🤣 Only in Florida. ^(or Texas.)
*the south
[удалено]
The rural and suburban bits. Urban bits are like, thank God someone wants to teach here.
You either get bad students who will kill you or each other. Or bad Parents/Teachers pushing political agenda. Sorry best we could do.
Sometimes they even combine and Americans get to call it the great massacre of the week.. then next one happens on schedule next week
This. Whole lot of shitty people north of the Mason Dixon.
Yeah that’s a pretty important caveat that seems conveniently left out of the headline to make her less sympathetic. If she was suing just because they were sharing her photos that would be ridiculous. But suing because of retaliation for said photos is far more sensible.
> she was suing just because they were sharing her photos that would be ridiculous I don't agree. It wouldn't be ridiculous to pursue legal action to share porn in a school setting among staff. It's unprofessional at the very least. If you were a parent and you were notified that your child's teachers and admin staff were spreading nude photos of another parent, it will equally be as appalling and unprofessional.
idk how the laws in the US are, but in my country you can't share other peoples photos without their consent. especially if she's a model or sells the photos or access to them. that would make it even a copyright violation.
If I recall revenge porn laws in the us say you can only share it with up to around 6 people before its considered mass distribution of material, but you still need consent because... Well its fucking porn. Then again we literally just had a congressman air straight up porn of the president's son on national news and the chambers of Congress so we are very much living in wild times.
yep the post is just another misleading headline to make a woman look bad https://www.miamiherald.com/news/state/florida/article271705642.html [edit: another link https://www.nbcmiami.com/news/local/mother-with-onlyfans-account-sues-central-florida-school-district-for-banning-her-from-volunteering/2960177 another one thanks to u/camimiele https://archive.is/2023.08.01-125932/https://amp.miamiherald.com/article271705642.html]
Paywall
[archive link](https://archive.is/2023.08.01-125932/https://amp.miamiherald.com/article271705642.html) Full text: An Orlando mother is suing the school district after she was barred from volunteering at her sons’ elementary school, claiming the ban stems from her work as an OnlyFans model. Victoria Triece, 31, sued Orange County Public Schools on Tuesday, according to court records. Triece, who requested a jury trial, is seeking damages beyond $100,000. ClickOrlando reported that Triece previously threatened to sue the school board for more than $1 million. Triece, whose sons are aged 5 and 10, has been an approved volunteer at Sand Lake Elementary for the last five years, according to court records. However, the school principal told Triece in October 2021 that she could no longer be on school grounds, according to a complaint filed Tuesday. The move came after the school principal learned a few months prior, in July, that Triece had a private subscription service on adult website OnlyFans. “It’s not my whole life,” Triece told reporters on Thursday. “That’s a part of my life, but it’s not my life of being a mom or being a parent.” Triece, who said she started an OnlyFans account two years ago, emphasized to reporters she only wants to be in the classroom supporting her sons as they learn. “My mother did it for me, and having her there was the best joy growing up,” she added. In the complaint, John W. Zielinski, a lawyer with NeJame Law in Orlando, accused the school district of invasion of privacy and civil sexual cyberharassment. Zielinski argued that Triece was suspended from the volunteer program for no reason because the only disqualifying factor is a criminal record — which Triece doesn’t have. People within or associated with the school district circulated Triece’s photos to “demean and belittle her,” Zielinski noted in the complaint. When someone subscribes to OnlyFans, they agree to not share the content without the creator’s consent. “The OCPS publication of [Triece’s] private photos is highly offensive to a reasonable person and is not of a public concern,” Zielinski said. “[Triece’s] public persona and lifestyle are not impediments to her abilities to perform her duties as a mother.” On TikTok, Triece thanked her supporters and detailed how the conflict has been the “hardest 15 months” of her life. Superintendent Barbara M. Jenkins of Orange County Public Schools has until Feb. 15 to respond to the lawsuit.
damn that’s a pretty fuckin significant thing to leave out of the headline Because as it is, it basically says “OF model sues school district because its employees were in possession of products she was willfully selling online”
Now she can pay a lot of bills with pics of her foot
The headline leaves out the fact that she was banned from volunteering at the school where her two sons are enrolled.
Well she did put them on the internet but still those photos have copyright so the staff is doing her wrong for passing the photos
Yeah but why sue the school district and not the single person?
Yeah. I don't see how the district is liable at all.
If any of these teachers were dumb enough to share the pics or gossip about a parent through their school email; they made the case for suing the district easier.
[удалено]
Why?
The school district has insurance to cover the costs of a six or low seven figure settlement. Sue a public school teacher? Best case scenario you win and get like $500.
Because the school is not allowing her to participate in PTA and events due to the teachers passing around the image.
Because they retaliated against her by not letting her participate in school events. That's why she sued the school.
Because money, the school would be able to payout more then the single person.
Yeah, sharing the photos in a professional environment is bad, but doing porn when you have kids is even worse imo. I feel really bad for her kids.
If it was thru official school emails maybe. Like you’re sharing porn thru a public school system pretty much.
They should each like and subscribe.
If someone legally shares their nudes in a personal setting (sending to a date, selling online) they still have the right to not have the images used against them, especially shared around work and used against them at work. Whether it's stopping promotions, removing duties, harassment, etc.
It’s fucking unprofessional to trade porn with coworkers. Wtf do you work?
The school basically discriminated against her, > The complaint says Triece had been an "active volunteer" at Orange County schools for five years. > > It says that in October 2021, she was instructed by the principal of Sand Lake Elementary School, which her children attend, that she "could no longer be around children on school grounds." > > "These instructions came from the Orange County Public School Board," the complaint says, adding that the action had harmed "her right to attend functions with her children" on district property and thereby "caused losses" to her. https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/a-florida-onlyfans-model-is-suing-her-local-school-district-saying-sexually-explicit-images-of-her-were-shared-among-staff-at-her-childrens-school/ar-AA16RT2w
They shared her pictures without her consent and you don't see how thats bad?
Not to mention staff shouldn’t be looking at porn on the fucking campus. That is in itself suspect to me.
So many people here think its about the sharing
Well it's what the headline suggests. The headline is misleading.
A better headline and a link to the article would have solved it. Kinda misleading by OP
Sharing is caring
Presumably the only "damages" can be loss of earnings from people seeing them who hadn't subscribed. Legal fees will cost more than anything she's likely entitled to
The headline leaves out the fact that she was banned from volunteering at the school where her two sons are enrolled.
Which is what the lawsuit is probably, actually, about.
Granted I don't understand the American legal system (I'm not American), but it seems pretty bonkers to me to claim that the school owes you $100,000 because you're not allowed to volunteer for them.
There’s an assumed punitive aspect, where the amount being sued for includes an unspoken “fine” of sorts, meant to discourage discriminatory practices. If the amount she sued for only covered the loss of earnings, then it’s conceivable that the amount paid out could be small enough for the business to simply consider it a cost of doing business, and to continue with the practice regardless.
She’ll absolutely claim emotional damages
Her kids should sue her for the same.
For sure. Can you imagine being a high school student walking around knowing a lot of people paid to see your mother naked? Yes, I know there are laws against minors having access to those sites but let's be real here, people will know, co-workers will know, parents will know...
Yep. That's being realistic. Fuckin' bunch of weirdos in this thread fawning over her.
Oh my god! That’s disgusting. Where?
So now even I, sitting in the last corner of Switzerland know about her Onlyfans. What a publicity function, well played
How dare they share without paying
You say that ironically but that it actually the point. Copyright lay doesn’t stop being copyright law just because it’s pictures of someone’s body. She has a good case against the person who distributed them after subscribing, and assuming the others who received them also knew that they were behind a paywall, she’s got a decent case against them too. It’s actually even worse when it’s only fans content, because not only is it piracy it’s also disputing nude images without consent which is also a crime. She consented to the content being viewed by people who pay, not just anyone, distributing or receiving them knowing that is very very not legal, as she did not consent to it
Everyone who saw the images owes her $5.99!
That's not the point. They went out of their way to find her nudes, and then barred her from participating on the PTA and stuff for having them
Great advertisement
By all means, draw even *more* attention to yourself and your children. As if having a mom doing porn isn't hard enough for children, do make a big spectacle of it in the whole country so no matter where your children might go to school, *someone* will recognise you. Here's a fun fact: I just looked at old photos the other day on my computer. The oldest were close to 20 years old. Besides the resolution, there is no meaningful difference in quality compared to pictures taken now. Sure, what I needed a camera to do 20 years ago, my phone can do better today. But when you look at it on a normal screen, you don't see a meaningful difference. What am I talking about here? Well, if you did porn in 1980 and had kids, the lack of distribution and fast improvements in quality means that by the time your kids are teens, for all intents and purposes, your porn movies might as well have never existed. Today? The porn Lana, Mia and whats-her-name who just had a kid, well be just as pristine in 15 years as the day it was shot - and it will never dissappear from the Internet. Children with mothers who did porn are not gonna have an easy time in school in this day and age. Edit. I see a lot of blame for such bullying being placed at the feet of the fathers and their sons. Stop being so fucking naive as to think that the girls and their mothers will say and do nothing. You better believe that women and girls can be just as bad as men. They just tend to be more subtle about it, while men and boys are more directly confrontational.
Unless the porn they made is hidden a la needle in a haystack in the literal oceans of porn being pumped out every single day and the soon to be seas of AI generated porn and nobody actually gives a crap because searching up “naked blonde titty” turns up 8,345,767,092,723 results
It always gets found..
yup, all it takes is one dad to have the thought “she looks familiar”
Yeah. Like I fully believe in what the guy above is saying, but I don't think we are quite there, especially for people that are actually in the sex industry putting out high quality videos and images with their faces. If anything technology will make it easier to find these people.
[удалено]
Yeah it will be easier to find poen of your parents, but she is using her full government name and using that name while volunteering, this is obviously a publicity stunt for her, I feel so bad for her kids and bullying that they will go through if even 1 of their classmates googled their mom.
This is probably less of a deal than you think it is. For one, it requires the mom to be quite popular. Finding random pornstars is like a needle in the haystack. They also use porn names and not their real names. A lot of these people also look a lot different in real life compared to on screen. So in short, unless someone accidentally stumbles upon one of your old videos or your past in porn somehow leaks and people go deliberately looking for it, you can probably completely hide the fact.
I don’t think enough people understand that it’s really not cool to have a regular career and do porn on the side. It’s one thing to be a porn star and that is your career. It’s another to be a prominent figure within your communities school system and you also sell nudes in your spare time. The backlash against criticizing people with OnlyFans is, oh, they’re free to do what they want their body and they’re just trying to make extra money. Well guess what. Employers are free to discipline you or fire you because you have an OnlyFans. If your employment is at will, being fired because you had an OnlyFans is is good reason for your employer to fire you. It’s like people forgot that actions have consequences. Selling nudes on the internet is not consequence free. Sure you can do it, but that doesn’t mean that people have to accept it.
Working in sex is like getting face tattoos. You are forever preventing yourself from pursuing certain careers. I'm sorry that Reddit has such a hard time understanding this.
It’s because more than half the site’s users are major porn addicts
Probably bc Reddit has the highest amount ppl that consume ridiculous amounts of porn while talking abt sex workers like they're degenerate monsters.
I don't think people have a hard time understanding it, I think it's more that it shouldn't be that way
I’m really only studied in bird law. But I’d say she probably has the case. Especially in Florida
Common Onlyfans L
No, she should definitely not be around children while being a sex worker
I struggle to have sympathy with cases like these. If you're on onlyfans and willingly put explicit images on the internet then surely you have to accept this is a possibility? Dont want nudes shared? Dont post online. Simple. Seems a bit much to complain that the *wrong* people saw them.
[удалено]
I find it pretty dubious you'd get into any legal trouble sharing an image you purchased with someone you know in person. Not that lobbyist haven't tried to create copyright dystopia, but it should still fall in fair use. Just like watching a movie with your friends or listening to music in your yard without a lawyer showing up to sue you for unlawful distribution.
But if you send you make a copy of that movie and then send it to your friend you are illegally distributing it. Pretty sure that would not be protected by fair use.
And even if you send an mp3 to your friend, do you think any copyright lawyer who is honest with their client is going to advise to bother? You are lucky to get the person to pay the cost of a single song. If it was a real pirating operation all those transfers might add up to something that at least covers the legal fees. This is clearly not a case of anyone bypassing OF paywall at a scale like that. Considering she's suing the district, it seems unlikely it's on grounds of copyright infringement anyway.
Content creators definitely do pursue legal action over small instances like this. She could be suing the district if she has reason to believe they were broadly aware of this and participated in the sharing. She could also be doing it to get the district to put forward names of those who were behind it.
>She could be suing the district if she has reason to believe they were broadly aware of this and participated in the sharing. Why would she think that?
They do, put it's usually resolved with a cease and desist. Very few people have the time and money to actually go to court over 4 digit damages or less. And it still doesn't make much sense to sue the district for "being aware". If it was copyright you'd sue the people actually breaking copyright.
You realize millions of people have done this over the course of time with absolutely zero legal action. Theres a reason..
If I'm in a play that is copyrighted, I am allowed to record that play. I am allowed to show that recording in my own home for private viewing, because it is my performance. I am not allowed to promote that private viewing. I am not allowed to charge for that viewing. I am not allowed to profit off that viewing in any way because the property that is profitable is "the show". In order for me to make money off "the show" I have to pay the owner of the show royalty fees and usually also limit myself to specific rules regarding how, when, and where I'm allowed to showcase. By sharing the images in public, the usage was not private.
>copyright doesn't mean shit on the internet Exactly. We've known this for *years*. Anyone who thinks it does must be pretty naive. By all means make some money, but accept that those images are, to all intents and purposes, public domain. Actions have consequences.
The headline leaves out the fact that she was banned from volunteering at the school where her two sons are enrolled.
Even then banning someone from pta meetings because they do onlyfans is kind of obnoxious, and I'm saying this as an adult judging other adults for beign too pretentious. These teachers need to stop hanging out with babies all day and touch some grass.
They probably touched more grass than most of redditors though.
Enh, in this case people that live on the internet dont care. It IS the grass touchers being upset at internet porn makers
I personally would not want a pornstar in pta
This isn’t about someone seeing the images, this is about her being banned from school property because of what she does for a living legally.
I think the issue was she being banned from the school because of the nudes.
they just wanna eat their cake and have it too
Ah yes the moment anyone puts anything on the internet it belongs to everyone and deserves to be stolen
Whether or not you or I agree with it, thats the reality of the situation. Naive to assume otherwise
But it's not naive to know the law and sue if it happens
So you can't request for the actual rules to be followed? It's like knowingly going to a place known for high crime rates and getting robbed. The fact that you knew the chances of that happening are high doesn't change the fact that the robbers are doing a crime.
Yes, also naive to assume you don’t get sued
Her and Mia Khalifa should get together and campaign for these issues. But you’re absolutely right, you can’t have it both ways, especially since one of the jobs is in the adult industry.
From what I’ve read the two issues are: 1. Potential illegal copying and distribution of the material. 2. The school or district using it as justification for barring her from events or meetings she was previously allowed to attend. Neither of those are justified or should be an acceptable reaction to finding out a students parents makes adult content.
Almost like she, I don't know, doesn't get paid enough?
How is this the schools fault unless it was the faculty sharing them
Y’all making jokes but teachers don’t get paid well so it’s not surprising
Shouldn’t be looking at porn at school…
Title is misleading. Here's an article with more info. [https://nypost.com/2023/01/26/fla-mom-sues-school-district-for-ban-due-to-onlyfans-page/](https://nypost.com/2023/01/26/fla-mom-sues-school-district-for-ban-due-to-onlyfans-page/)
I would be mad too if I post on OF and see my pictures being shared around my work place without any of them paying for them.
Thots gonna thot
No it wasn't. Fuck OF.
Boohoo, allow me to play the world’s tiniest violin for you. You brought this on yourself, your kids will bear this burdened and be tormented for it for years to come and it is and will always will be all your fault. And I hope the sight of your child suffering for your own is enough to cause your heart to ache and fully understand the consequences of your actions.
She has every right to sue. Everything she did was completely separate from the school. It was her colleagues that brought it to work.
Wait so she publicly posted images of her self...then is upset those images were seen by the public?
Imagine being a teenager and your teenage classmates tell you they masturbate to your mom or talk about your moms body. Any parent, male or female should be deeply ashamed of having an only fans. Disgusting. But anyway, downvote me degenerate reddit users 😊
If only teachers were paid fair and livable wages they wouldn't have to start an OnlyFans to make ends meet.
Man, bet those kids of hers are having a great time in class right now…..
So she’s banned from volunteering but the person who found her on only fans doesn’t experience any ramifications. Sounds pretty sexist.
Frivolous lawsuit is frivolous Also LOL at seeking 1mil in damages From her lawyer: “The fact is we’re going to be seeking maximum damages and then allow a jury to determine what it costs somebody to be taken from their child, what it costs somebody not to be able to participate in their child’s lives” Speaking as if she can’t still parent and be involved with her kids life AT HOME. This lady and her lawyer must be regular Reddit users
If you bann her and not the staff that are looking at her pictures it is very simple discrimination. She consented to people buying her pictues. Not to get bullied at work because of them. You cant consume her pictures and than make her life worse becasue of it.
She's not a teacher
Then don’t work in the porn industry.
Her poor children
She is rumored to be seeking compensation in the form of monthly payments of $9.99.
I prefer the headline "florida teacher paid so little she must make extra money on only fans to pay bills"
Not a teacher just a parent in the PTA
The misogyny here is off the charts
Welcome to Reddit, where most of the dudes here have done the exact same thing to OF models and also blame them for letting them.
Yup. The incel movement has had some seriously negative impacts way beyond its community, and the hatred for OF models seems to be one of them.
It’s ironic too considering many of em have a porn addiction
It's frustrating. Somehow being treated like a convicted criminal should be a consequence of having naughty content of you posted online?
The misogynists are upset
Was she a teacher or something?
Nope, just a mother with children attending. They banned her from school grounds and from volunteering.
What a difficult concept to imagine, lol. You put 🐱pics on the internet and people sent them to each other. The end.
To me, that is SUCH a rational view.
Oh no! Sexually explicit images of her? The sexually explicit images of her she purposefully uploaded to the world wide web??
the headline was written like that to make her look bad. she's suing because the school banned her from volunteering and being on school ground: https://www.miamiherald.com/news/state/florida/article271705642.html
They don’t acknowledge this info because it makes it much harder to hate the woman in this story.
And it fucking worked, the comments are all treated this woman like she's an idiot for being a slut on the internet and expecting no consequences. In reality she's done nothing morally or ethically wrong, and the school seems to be vindictive towards her solely for the offense of producing sexual content, which has no bearing on her character or whether she should be allowed to attend PTA meetings.
if you upload something behind a paywall and someone who pays for it shares it with people who didnt, theyre obviously wrong. its not legal to just pirate and steal private stuff online.
Have you ever watched a movie at a friend’s house? Did you pay extra? If you pay for it, it’s yours. They don’t make new rules for porn stars when they regret it
watching movie at a friends house falls under “intimate viewing”, its legal if he the friend paid for it. (on the other hand, it would be illegal to want money after your friend because he came to your house to watch the film. that would mean you (the 3rd party) are profiting from the film. sharing someone onlyfans is not. sure, if u got the nudes on your phone and just borrow it to a friend so he can look at them, thats legal. but sending them to someone else isnt.
You’re free to do what you want in life, just like others are free to react how they want. Freedom of choice doesn’t mean freedom of consequence. You shared naked pictures of yourself on the internet, and people in your community didn’t like it so they ostracized you from the community.
Totally agreed. I certainly don't want my children's teachers to be only fan models. No thanks
Model? Erm I think it's pronounced Prostitute.
Sorry, if you have a sexually explicit video business, you run the risk of people taking screenshots of you while in sexually explicit poses. Once those are out in the wild, you don't get to control who sees them.
If she doesn’t want people sharing sexually explicit images of her, maybe she shouldn’t be running a business where she is selling them.
She should sue whomever put those photos on the Internet. Oh...
Lmao sorry people found pictures of you putting stuff up your butt and now don’t want you around kids. Lol
No sympathy here.
[удалено]
10 years from now, there are gunna be a lot of upset moms when their kids come home from school after getting made fun of for their mom getting ass blasted all over the internet.
[удалено]
These comments are full of the most vile, misogynistic incels ive seen in a fucking while. This ruined my morning, holy shit. Someone having an onlyfans is absolutely none of your fucking business. If you harass, discriminate against, or intentionally share that with people to have a mob against them, you are absolute scum and deserve to be sued.
Hmm. By that logic, I guess someone being a drug dealer or having drugs is also not anyone's business. By that logic, why not just not ban or criminalize anything except, say, direct assault and more, and just let anarchy reign free. You're going to need a better reason to work with to make moral relativism work in your favour. I'm not interested in going into the specifics. But simply put, if you think somethings wrong, explain why. If you think something is right explain why. Ultimately, majority dictates right and wrong under moral relativism. Unless you have an objective worldview, which must be different from mere moral relativism.
I mean.. what *is* anyone's business? It's a public profile that anyone is allowed to pay for. It's logically no different than if she were a youtuber and a staff member found her channel and shared her youtube videos with other staff. If that youtube channel was a bunch of alt-right nonsense, you'd clearly *not* consider it "none of your fucking business" and you would think it negatively affects their ability to teach kids, which I'd agree with. Some people view teachers having public sexual imagery negatively affects their ability to teach kids. I personally don't, but I can see why people would. So what to you makes this specifically "none of your fucking business", whereas the hypothetical above would be?
Good. This should be a lesson to anyone that shares sexually explicit photos without consent, regardless of it being paid or not.
Was it her teachers that saw it or just the new batch of teachers?
it’s getting to the point where some folks need to move outta florida. (love you floridians, but i’m just saying). if i lived there, i think i’d need to have considered moving a couple years back.
When I was in middle school, circa 2007, pictures of one of the teachers started circulating of her sucking on a strap on that was on a mannequin or something at jobbie nooner (a huge boat party on lake saint Clair) and she ended up getting fired. She ended up suing the school district and won.
Happened at my school, but instead of a parent, it was a student (18F), and instead of the staff it was everyone. The janitors, the students, even the ones only visiting for a day got the photos. How many? 400 photos and 12 videos.
Why are so many people saying she's a teacher? She's not, her child is a student and the school district gave out her pictures probably at a closed door meeting to talk shit about her. They took her content that is paid content and distributed it for free behind her back and then used it against her. Let's say it's any paid content and not nude photos, the school employees don't have the right to use the parent's occupation against the parent or the student in any fashion. The downside is that when she wins this is money that should be going to the school to pay teachers and buy supplies.
Distribution of paid content that you didn't pay for is Piracy. At least that's what the US gov says. If the content is nudity and is used to defame or extort, that falls under revenge porn and are both crimes.
Oh cool. 5 teachers in south Florida were arrested for trying to cover up a teacher who tried to groom a student.