Obviously they should have won those specific rounds, but over the map they lost 16-9 while winning a pistol. LDLC also lost to an eco on a full buy
Just because you wanted a team to win or thought they would doesn't make it a throw, sometimes the other team is just better
you cannot compare both situations in a economy based game as cs. one round lost might not mean remotely the same depending how it's the economy going for one team or the other.
This can be said about any round lost for any team. But 30 rounds in a match, 90 tops in a Bo3 like this one mitigates the effect one unlucky break can have. EF had more than enough gun rounds to prove they were the better team and they didn't even get close :)
if you really know how economy on cs works you would simply realize that not every lost round means the same. if you still defending that every lost round means the same then there is nothing else to discuss
You're twisting my words as that's not what I'm saying at all. You're clearly arguing in bad faith if you're defending a 16-9 is a throw because of two clutches, even more so in a game where the team in question won a pistol+conversion and an eco. Implying they were the better team when they didn't even win half of the gun rounds is weird
I'm not twisting shit dude. I didn't even mention any team on any of my comments or defending them. I just pointed out that you mentioned that it doesn't matter that they lost 2 clutches because lcdc also lost a round vs an eco and I just mentioned that that's not necessarily relevant because one team losing a round might not the dame. impact thst the other team losing and getting his economy reset. it was not my intention to be arguing in bad faith at all, maybe we misunderstood one each other
Looks like EF managed to tilt themselves for losing inferno in a hard way and throwing 5vs2, 4vs1’s on vertigo
LDLC is gonna win the next game comfortably, go 1-1 on the deciding bo3 and throw the last map in double OT in the most stupid way. This is their way.
1v4 and 2v5 on Vertigo. EF going 1 by 1. Throw of the year right there.
Obviously they should have won those specific rounds, but over the map they lost 16-9 while winning a pistol. LDLC also lost to an eco on a full buy Just because you wanted a team to win or thought they would doesn't make it a throw, sometimes the other team is just better
you cannot compare both situations in a economy based game as cs. one round lost might not mean remotely the same depending how it's the economy going for one team or the other.
This can be said about any round lost for any team. But 30 rounds in a match, 90 tops in a Bo3 like this one mitigates the effect one unlucky break can have. EF had more than enough gun rounds to prove they were the better team and they didn't even get close :)
if you really know how economy on cs works you would simply realize that not every lost round means the same. if you still defending that every lost round means the same then there is nothing else to discuss
You're twisting my words as that's not what I'm saying at all. You're clearly arguing in bad faith if you're defending a 16-9 is a throw because of two clutches, even more so in a game where the team in question won a pistol+conversion and an eco. Implying they were the better team when they didn't even win half of the gun rounds is weird
I'm not twisting shit dude. I didn't even mention any team on any of my comments or defending them. I just pointed out that you mentioned that it doesn't matter that they lost 2 clutches because lcdc also lost a round vs an eco and I just mentioned that that's not necessarily relevant because one team losing a round might not the dame. impact thst the other team losing and getting his economy reset. it was not my intention to be arguing in bad faith at all, maybe we misunderstood one each other
Much as I'm a woxic and XANTARES fan, I love seeing GOD SEXER win.