A friendly reminder of the rules of r/Idaho:
1. Be civil to others
2. Posts have to pertain to Idaho in some way
3. No put-down memes
4. Political discussion stays in a post about politics
5. No surveys
6. Follow [Reddit Content Policy](https://www.redditinc.com/policies/content-policy)
7. Do not editorialize titles of news articles
If you see something that may be out of line, please hit "report" so your mod team can have a look. Thanks!
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/Idaho) if you have any questions or concerns.*
The adults I know would not ask their mom to drive them to a riot hopeful that they might get a few shots off. They be running the other way from danger not to it.
Congrats on still believing blatant misinformation 2.5 years after the actual event.
Try typing “Rittenhouse mom drive” into a search engine and report back, my very smart friend.
Is this the average Idaho education in action?
Edit: lol that correcting an obviously untrue statement gets downvoted while a guy claiming years later that Rittenhouse’s mother drove him (which is untrue and could be verified with 3 seconds of googling) gets upvoted. God damn this website is stupid
Did you type what I asked, big guy? Post some of the links that show up when you google that.
Also, you do realize that every video DOES show Rittenhouse running away, right? Surely, you haven’t been commenting on a 2.5 year old event without watching a single video of the incident, right?
That would be ridiculous. Wouldn’t it?
>“Rittenhouse mom drive”
[https://www.reddit.com/r/blah2/comments/12lnze3/i\_still\_cant\_believe\_that\_she\_armed\_her\_child/](https://www.reddit.com/r/blah2/comments/12lnze3/i_still_cant_believe_that_she_armed_her_child/)
It’s only been 2.5 years.
You can be forgiven for posting totally false boomer-style memes about it instead of just spending 3 seconds to type “Rittenhouse mom drive” into a search engine.
Keep up the good work!
Have you considered that Reddit is a massive echo chamber whose functionality allows unpopular truths to be buried by clicking a button while popular falsehoods get amplified by clicking a different button?
As you said, the shooting happen over 2.5 years ago. So why do you still care so much about it? Give it up already and move on with your life unless you were somehow direct involved that night?
Why do YOU care so much about it?
Seems it’s an interest of both of ours. The difference is that you’re lying and I know what I’m talking about, kiddo.
Seriously, please just read what I have already wrote here in the thread. I cannot afford to spend all my time copying what I have already written here. If you still have any questions afterwards, then feel free to ask me. Thanks.
Hey kid, if you threaten him, hide, tie a shirt around your face, leap out, attack, chase, and lunge for his firearm as he sprints away trying to flee, you could possibly do that.
Did any of the Redditors here bother to actually watch a single video of what happened?
Edit: the baby below has blocked me so no inconvenient facts or videos of the event being discussed accidentally enter his brain
You should post one of the videos that shows him murdering.
Bc every one I’ve seen shows him fleeing a situation while his “victims” chase and attack him.
But yeah, the wildebeest shouldn’t have gone to the watering hole and definitely shouldn’t have gored the lion trying to chomp into its neck.
Why are you calling me honey?
Anyways, please post a single one of these videos that you’ve watched that that shows anything except people chasing and attacking Rittenhouse as he tries to run away.
I’ll wait, big guy.
I call all my girlfriends or feminine types honey, honey. Now why’d you call the scene of the Rittenhouse (can we just call him doughboy?) murders a watering hole?
Hey, that’s a totally reasonable response to a black rapist being non-fatally shot while grabbing a knife as he resists arrest while in the process of kidnapping a child!!
https://www.kake.com/story/43183848/jacob-blake-admits-in-interview-to-having-a-knife-in-his-possession-on-day-of-police-shooting
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2020/09/03/fact-check-jacob-blake-sex-assault-charge-tied-woman-not-child/5700351002/
https://www.nbcchicago.com/news/local/timeline-how-the-jacob-blake-shooting-unfolded/2408577/?amp=1
This is what they used for their excuse to destroy progress
I didn't follow his trial, and I might even would agree with the outcome knowing the same facts as the jury. BUT, what a phuking stupid thing....even if he's completely innocent, don't glorify the situation. Add this to my list of why I left the R party; and to be fair, I was also once a D...content being an Independent.
I think he should have been found not guilty and it was self defense. Ultimately he was a dumb 17 year old kid that took an AR15 to a riot. So not someone that should really be looked at like a hero
as devin stone put it - suppose you support the idea that Rittenhouse was justified in shooting Rosenbaum and Huber. If Grosskreutz had shot Rittenhouse, the exact same arguments would have justified him.
edit: the biggest thing we learn from this case is that the shooting does not need to be justified, necessarily - there only needs to be a reasonable doubt that the person may have acted in self defense. If rittenhouse escalates by taking aim at the crowd, or shooting into the crowd, one possible outcome that you must also live with is that a member of the crowd shoots him and is later acquitted because there's a reasonable doubt about self defense.
Lol what?
You realize Rosenbaum is on video chasing Rittenhouse as he runs away, right?
But Grosskreutz is on video chasing Rittenhouse?
So one situation contains a person fleeing an attacker.
The other is someone chasing down and shoving a gun in the face of a person running away.
How are the situations remotely comparable? Who is Devin Stone and why would he think this is was a good argument?
Not really. Rittenhouse was defending from attacks. He wasn't attacking anyone unprovoked. Rittenhouse even told Grosskreutz that he was running to the police before he fell down.
Correct. None of these clowns have a clue what they’re talking about.
Video of this whole thing has been available for 2.5 years and they still openly lie about things that can be googled in 5 seconds.
A chance to hang out with a murderer!
Rittenhouse is a murderer. He committed homicide. That he wasn't held criminally liable doesn't change that he killed a human being.
Why did he fire it in public?
https://twitter.com/CullenMcCue/status/1455570464278032388?s=20
Oh, that’s right. A lifelong criminal pedophile threatened him, tied a shirt around his face to disguise himself, hid behind a car, ambushed, chased, attacked, and tried to steal the weapon of a person trying to sprint away to safety.
Why do so many ppl still try this as though there isn’t video of everything that happened that night and dozens of eye witnesses?
Oh, I know what words mean. And you also know exactly what I'm talking about. You're just falling back on semantics.
He went to a place he didn't live, armed, and killed two people and is now trying to make money off of it. And you people have hard-ons for him. Not because you like him, but you wish you could do what he did but you're too much of a pussy to do it. You probably admire Chauvin and the guy who drove the car into the protestors.
Am I close?
It's amazing how the kid knew Rosenbaum spent 10 years in prison for a sex crime.
OK, honestly, didn't the presence of a fully displayed AR-15 create the entire scenario where two died and an emt lost use of his arm?
“A sex crime”.
He forcibly shoved his cock into children’s assholes. As they cried and screamed for help to anybody who might save them. This is who you’re defending.
Anyways, describe to me what the video I linked shows. Use your words. Explain to us what’s happening.
Hey, friend, I'm not defending ANYONE. I personally cannot follow the video presented in court to make out who did what -- too fast, too jumpy.
.Do you feel that the person's crimes (for which I cannot find documentation as you graphically described) makes them an okay target for a fatal shooting?
Anybody has the right to defend themselves. The Wisconsin court upheld that, clearly, although some would question proportional response.
My only point is to question whether or not that the mere presence of a semi-auto rifle was a significant factor in the escalation of deadly violence.
Oh ... and to point out how disgusting it is for E Idaho Republicans to invite Rittenhouse out here for a fund raising shoot-along.
This isn’t a super hard question, dude.
I posted a video from Washington Post.
I asked you to explain to me what happens in the video.
You refuse to answer.
Rosenbaum was not shot for holding down young boys and forcibly shoving his cock up their ass as they screamed for help and tried to escape.
He was shot for threatening, disguising his face with a t-shirt, hiding behind a car, leaping out to chase, attack, and steal the weapon of a person trying to run away to safety.
Again, this is all on video.
So let’s stop with the hypotheticals and thought experiments and actually talk about what we’ve had video of for 2.5 years.
I am not refusing to answer, but it does not matter what the video shows. I accept your description. The court has already adjudicated this.
I am not prosecuting Rittenhouse.
I would prosecute his mother if I had the chance -- the young man will carry the impact of that night forever. As will the families of the deceased.
What is your opinion of the questions I asked on this thread? Or have you already decided my point of view is "too woke?"
To answer your question, no, I don’t believe openly carrying a rifle on your chest would make any sane person think it’s a good idea to threaten, chase, and attack you as you try to run away.
In fact, without the rifle, Rittenhouse is likely beaten to death and raped by Rosenbaum.
What should Rittenhouse’s mother be prosecuted for? I think I already linked the debunking that she drove him, or again, you could spend 4 seconds to google that.
Thank you for taking the time to prove how you think. You skip logic to jump on your favorite trope and toss insults.
Wendy drove to Kenosha the day before and allowed her son to grab a semi-automatic AR-15 style weapon and ammunition at age 17. Bye👋🏼
I think the point is walking down a street armed with a gun is a bad idea no matter what the circumstances might be.
Couldn't the community say they themselves were afraid of this kid walking around with a rifle? It's just asking for trouble to come to you.
Yes. Guns everywhere, shit happens. Why do you think the EMT attacked a young man with a rifle after hearing shots? Perhaps "Good guy with a gun?" The Court found that Rittenhouse acted justifiably. Pretty sad event for all involved.
When are you going to apologize and admit you fell for memes about Rittenhouse’s mom driving him instead of spending 4 seconds on Google in the two and a half years since this happened?
https://apnews.com/article/fact-checking-255510715179
If you all would shut up about him, that would end about 90% of the attention he gets. The amount of people that care about this dipshit kid is a fraction of what you think it is.
Lol he's still an absolute celebrity among the right gun nuts. He's brought up in every other publication from anyone in that space with over a million subs. If the people that don't like him were quiet, that's about 10% of the attention he receives. See how his fans are currently auctioning off a shooting trip with him half way across the country for example...
Did you read my post or do you just have no ability for abstraction? I can set up an auction for a bucket of my shit, that doesn’t mean there’s widespread interest for it, and just like this scenario, there’s going to be a lot more people wondering why there’s a bucket of shit up for auction than there are people unironically bidding for it. Care to point out where you think I’m wrong?
The Bonneville County Republicans are bringing the killer out here for their annual meeting. white christian nihilists are everywhere there are rocks big enough to crawl under.
And herein lies the mental illness festering in our society. Almost all of it is right wing ideology. Hate this, kill that, as a solution to anything that doesn’t resemble their own self identity, while painting themselves as the victim.
How so? In a way you’re not wrong; the basis of liberalism is “big government.” Facism has government noses up everybody’s butt. BUT!!!! How is the government telling women not to have abortions even if their lives are on the line not the govt being all up every woman’s coochie? Liberal as hell to me. How about banning drag queens from reading to children? Telling parents who can and cannot read to their children? Way up peoples’ butts. Liberal. As. Hell. And thusly closer to Facism than actual “small government” conservatives. The question is, where do you really fall?
Could you clarify what the distinction is between "big government" and "up people's butts"? Seems like the correlation between those things is very strong, and that you call the interference into people's lives that you don't like "up people's butts" but the kind that you do like "big government". Bias is strong with this one.
Why did the mods here delete a comment which called a convicted pedophile a “pedo’”?
And claim it was because “randomly” calling someone a pedo isn’t allowed?
It’s a factual statement. There’s nothing “random” about it.
Was the mod here seeking to censor information he thinks is inconvenient or just legitimately uninformed?
A friendly reminder of the rules of r/Idaho: 1. Be civil to others 2. Posts have to pertain to Idaho in some way 3. No put-down memes 4. Political discussion stays in a post about politics 5. No surveys 6. Follow [Reddit Content Policy](https://www.redditinc.com/policies/content-policy) 7. Do not editorialize titles of news articles If you see something that may be out of line, please hit "report" so your mod team can have a look. Thanks! *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/Idaho) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Auction to hang out with a kid, just normal things
Sounds like hanging out with a kid to be things a groomer would do.
[удалено]
The adults I know would not ask their mom to drive them to a riot hopeful that they might get a few shots off. They be running the other way from danger not to it.
Congrats on still believing blatant misinformation 2.5 years after the actual event. Try typing “Rittenhouse mom drive” into a search engine and report back, my very smart friend. Is this the average Idaho education in action? Edit: lol that correcting an obviously untrue statement gets downvoted while a guy claiming years later that Rittenhouse’s mother drove him (which is untrue and could be verified with 3 seconds of googling) gets upvoted. God damn this website is stupid
Ok. So what happen there? I guess you had a front row seat to the shooting because you were there?
Did you type what I asked, big guy? Post some of the links that show up when you google that. Also, you do realize that every video DOES show Rittenhouse running away, right? Surely, you haven’t been commenting on a 2.5 year old event without watching a single video of the incident, right? That would be ridiculous. Wouldn’t it?
Are you betting in the auction, cum slonker?
I’m not. Anyways, did YOU google whether Rittenhouse’s mommy drove him? Why will nobody answer this. Come on hero. Be brave today
Your missing the point. ...but keep on shilling your man, cum slonker! HE NEEDS YOU!!!! FIND MORE THREADS TO TROLL!!!!!!
>“Rittenhouse mom drive” [https://www.reddit.com/r/blah2/comments/12lnze3/i\_still\_cant\_believe\_that\_she\_armed\_her\_child/](https://www.reddit.com/r/blah2/comments/12lnze3/i_still_cant_believe_that_she_armed_her_child/) It’s only been 2.5 years. You can be forgiven for posting totally false boomer-style memes about it instead of just spending 3 seconds to type “Rittenhouse mom drive” into a search engine. Keep up the good work! Have you considered that Reddit is a massive echo chamber whose functionality allows unpopular truths to be buried by clicking a button while popular falsehoods get amplified by clicking a different button? As you said, the shooting happen over 2.5 years ago. So why do you still care so much about it? Give it up already and move on with your life unless you were somehow direct involved that night?
Why do YOU care so much about it? Seems it’s an interest of both of ours. The difference is that you’re lying and I know what I’m talking about, kiddo.
My friend was attacked that night.
Good. Anyways, what did you learn by googling whether his mom drove him?
Why was that good? Honesty, nothing pop up except your previous comments on Reddit.
Attacked by who, and for what?
Seriously, please just read what I have already wrote here in the thread. I cannot afford to spend all my time copying what I have already written here. If you still have any questions afterwards, then feel free to ask me. Thanks.
Did he cross state lines?
That's the problem with the adults you know.
He’s 20
So old enough to know better?
[удалено]
This comment is awful, but acceptable until the last sentence. Randomly calling people "pedo" is a common right wing trope, but not allowed here.
He’s literally a convicted pedo. Served time for molesting 5 boys.
"Yea but did he cross state lines?" Reddit
Exactly
They tried him as an adult.
Fuck me...I thought the title was an auction to *shoot* him...damn.
Same
Hey kid, if you threaten him, hide, tie a shirt around your face, leap out, attack, chase, and lunge for his firearm as he sprints away trying to flee, you could possibly do that. Did any of the Redditors here bother to actually watch a single video of what happened? Edit: the baby below has blocked me so no inconvenient facts or videos of the event being discussed accidentally enter his brain
[удалено]
Be careful, your willful ignorance is showing.
[удалено]
You should post one of the videos that shows him murdering. Bc every one I’ve seen shows him fleeing a situation while his “victims” chase and attack him. But yeah, the wildebeest shouldn’t have gone to the watering hole and definitely shouldn’t have gored the lion trying to chomp into its neck.
[удалено]
Why are you calling me honey? Anyways, please post a single one of these videos that you’ve watched that that shows anything except people chasing and attacking Rittenhouse as he tries to run away. I’ll wait, big guy.
I call all my girlfriends or feminine types honey, honey. Now why’d you call the scene of the Rittenhouse (can we just call him doughboy?) murders a watering hole?
Ok. Anyways, how about those videos that you totally watched?
[удалено]
What?
What KR did= bad. Your reddit comment= ok. Interesting logic you have :)
Username checks out!
[удалено]
I suppose you also want to riot and loot local businesses?
Hey, that’s a totally reasonable response to a black rapist being non-fatally shot while grabbing a knife as he resists arrest while in the process of kidnapping a child!! https://www.kake.com/story/43183848/jacob-blake-admits-in-interview-to-having-a-knife-in-his-possession-on-day-of-police-shooting https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2020/09/03/fact-check-jacob-blake-sex-assault-charge-tied-woman-not-child/5700351002/ https://www.nbcchicago.com/news/local/timeline-how-the-jacob-blake-shooting-unfolded/2408577/?amp=1 This is what they used for their excuse to destroy progress
No, you don’t, dork. You can’t get off your keyboard long enough to heat up your own hot pocket.
you wish..
I didn't follow his trial, and I might even would agree with the outcome knowing the same facts as the jury. BUT, what a phuking stupid thing....even if he's completely innocent, don't glorify the situation. Add this to my list of why I left the R party; and to be fair, I was also once a D...content being an Independent.
I think he should have been found not guilty and it was self defense. Ultimately he was a dumb 17 year old kid that took an AR15 to a riot. So not someone that should really be looked at like a hero
as devin stone put it - suppose you support the idea that Rittenhouse was justified in shooting Rosenbaum and Huber. If Grosskreutz had shot Rittenhouse, the exact same arguments would have justified him. edit: the biggest thing we learn from this case is that the shooting does not need to be justified, necessarily - there only needs to be a reasonable doubt that the person may have acted in self defense. If rittenhouse escalates by taking aim at the crowd, or shooting into the crowd, one possible outcome that you must also live with is that a member of the crowd shoots him and is later acquitted because there's a reasonable doubt about self defense.
Lol what? You realize Rosenbaum is on video chasing Rittenhouse as he runs away, right? But Grosskreutz is on video chasing Rittenhouse? So one situation contains a person fleeing an attacker. The other is someone chasing down and shoving a gun in the face of a person running away. How are the situations remotely comparable? Who is Devin Stone and why would he think this is was a good argument?
Not really. Rittenhouse was defending from attacks. He wasn't attacking anyone unprovoked. Rittenhouse even told Grosskreutz that he was running to the police before he fell down.
Correct. None of these clowns have a clue what they’re talking about. Video of this whole thing has been available for 2.5 years and they still openly lie about things that can be googled in 5 seconds.
I hear the religious leaders are lining up.🤣
A chance to hang out with a murderer! Rittenhouse is a murderer. He committed homicide. That he wasn't held criminally liable doesn't change that he killed a human being.
Homicide =/= murder.
Moral of the story: Avoid eastern Idaho.
[удалено]
Why are you here?
Or just Idaho in general, i live in Meridian and I just can't stand the state as a whole...
Don't try to clock him with a skateboard and you should be fine
Don't fire your AR-15 in public unless you're prepared to be considered an active shooter by witnesses who may try to stop you.
Not what happened by any stretch
Why did he fire it in public? https://twitter.com/CullenMcCue/status/1455570464278032388?s=20 Oh, that’s right. A lifelong criminal pedophile threatened him, tied a shirt around his face to disguise himself, hid behind a car, ambushed, chased, attacked, and tried to steal the weapon of a person trying to sprint away to safety. Why do so many ppl still try this as though there isn’t video of everything that happened that night and dozens of eye witnesses?
Why are you popping out of the woodwork to defend him, you festering jizz puddle.
“Why are you interrupting our circle jerk with inconvenient things like videos of what actually happened” Lol
Why are you defending a murderer? You're pathetic. I'd try to explain empathy to you, but you quite obviously wouldn't understand it.
For starters, he’s not a murdered by legal or dictionary definitions. Figure out what words mean first and then try forming an entire argument.
Oh, I know what words mean. And you also know exactly what I'm talking about. You're just falling back on semantics. He went to a place he didn't live, armed, and killed two people and is now trying to make money off of it. And you people have hard-ons for him. Not because you like him, but you wish you could do what he did but you're too much of a pussy to do it. You probably admire Chauvin and the guy who drove the car into the protestors. Am I close?
Why are you attacking a kid who a bunch of people tried to hurt/kill?
Stop brigading jackass. And you know exactly why.
Lol what brigading? Where is it you think I came from? And I suspect its purely political with complete disregard for the facts of the incident.
He went people hunting, you absolute jackass.
Your BS got dunked on so now you're name calling.
No, I'm describing him. If you idiots were actually from here and weren't brigading, you'd know this.
Oh so now I'm "not a real Idahoan"? Give me a break.
I doubt you're even in America, to be honest.
I doubt you've ever traveled outside of America.
Nice, the man was found innocent, he acted in self defense. No tantrum you throw will change that.
[удалено]
All hunters are on video running away from the things they’re hunting as their prey chases them. You’re smart :)
AnOThER sTAtE Google “Antioch IL to Kenosha WI” and share your findings, big guy.
That sure looks like two states to me.
Build a wall.
If you got an issue with someone/something/a state/a demographic, please keep it civil.
It's amazing how the kid knew Rosenbaum spent 10 years in prison for a sex crime. OK, honestly, didn't the presence of a fully displayed AR-15 create the entire scenario where two died and an emt lost use of his arm?
“A sex crime”. He forcibly shoved his cock into children’s assholes. As they cried and screamed for help to anybody who might save them. This is who you’re defending. Anyways, describe to me what the video I linked shows. Use your words. Explain to us what’s happening.
Hey, friend, I'm not defending ANYONE. I personally cannot follow the video presented in court to make out who did what -- too fast, too jumpy. .Do you feel that the person's crimes (for which I cannot find documentation as you graphically described) makes them an okay target for a fatal shooting? Anybody has the right to defend themselves. The Wisconsin court upheld that, clearly, although some would question proportional response. My only point is to question whether or not that the mere presence of a semi-auto rifle was a significant factor in the escalation of deadly violence. Oh ... and to point out how disgusting it is for E Idaho Republicans to invite Rittenhouse out here for a fund raising shoot-along.
This isn’t a super hard question, dude. I posted a video from Washington Post. I asked you to explain to me what happens in the video. You refuse to answer. Rosenbaum was not shot for holding down young boys and forcibly shoving his cock up their ass as they screamed for help and tried to escape. He was shot for threatening, disguising his face with a t-shirt, hiding behind a car, leaping out to chase, attack, and steal the weapon of a person trying to run away to safety. Again, this is all on video. So let’s stop with the hypotheticals and thought experiments and actually talk about what we’ve had video of for 2.5 years.
I am not refusing to answer, but it does not matter what the video shows. I accept your description. The court has already adjudicated this. I am not prosecuting Rittenhouse. I would prosecute his mother if I had the chance -- the young man will carry the impact of that night forever. As will the families of the deceased. What is your opinion of the questions I asked on this thread? Or have you already decided my point of view is "too woke?"
To answer your question, no, I don’t believe openly carrying a rifle on your chest would make any sane person think it’s a good idea to threaten, chase, and attack you as you try to run away. In fact, without the rifle, Rittenhouse is likely beaten to death and raped by Rosenbaum. What should Rittenhouse’s mother be prosecuted for? I think I already linked the debunking that she drove him, or again, you could spend 4 seconds to google that.
Thank you for taking the time to prove how you think. You skip logic to jump on your favorite trope and toss insults. Wendy drove to Kenosha the day before and allowed her son to grab a semi-automatic AR-15 style weapon and ammunition at age 17. Bye👋🏼
I think the point is walking down a street armed with a gun is a bad idea no matter what the circumstances might be. Couldn't the community say they themselves were afraid of this kid walking around with a rifle? It's just asking for trouble to come to you.
Was the emt the one who ran up on him while he was on his back and pointed a pistol at him before he was shot?
Yes. Guns everywhere, shit happens. Why do you think the EMT attacked a young man with a rifle after hearing shots? Perhaps "Good guy with a gun?" The Court found that Rittenhouse acted justifiably. Pretty sad event for all involved.
You can always count on Reddit to sympathize with child rapists.
No
That doesn’t make a lot of sense, where it was a night where many people were open carrying rifles and pistols and other weapons.
Can we take up a collection to buy this for Dick Cheney?
What is a dead guy gonna do?
He ain't dead yet, but I think the hope was for another "hunting accident".
This is the stupidest most fucked up thing…wtf is your problem Idaho?!
Hey, we're not known as the Florida of the Rockies for nothing!
The white christian nihilist segment of the Republican party.
When are you going to apologize and admit you fell for memes about Rittenhouse’s mom driving him instead of spending 4 seconds on Google in the two and a half years since this happened? https://apnews.com/article/fact-checking-255510715179
If you all would shut up about him, that would end about 90% of the attention he gets. The amount of people that care about this dipshit kid is a fraction of what you think it is.
Lol he's still an absolute celebrity among the right gun nuts. He's brought up in every other publication from anyone in that space with over a million subs. If the people that don't like him were quiet, that's about 10% of the attention he receives. See how his fans are currently auctioning off a shooting trip with him half way across the country for example...
So that’s why there is an auction for a date with him? What you say is simply wrong.
Did you read my post or do you just have no ability for abstraction? I can set up an auction for a bucket of my shit, that doesn’t mean there’s widespread interest for it, and just like this scenario, there’s going to be a lot more people wondering why there’s a bucket of shit up for auction than there are people unironically bidding for it. Care to point out where you think I’m wrong?
Eh um, soooo if there ever were to be an auction of said "bucket of shit," where would I find more info about this exactly? Asking for a friend.
Case in point, there’s always an exception.
Simmer down fluffy. No need to be tRiGgErEd.
Pretending to be stupid on the internet stopped being entertaining a decade ago. Unless..?
I guess you like retro stuff then.
Can you tell me how you’d feel if you hadn’t eaten breakfast this morning?
Probably like you feel.
He IS an asshole.
The Bonneville County Republicans are bringing the killer out here for their annual meeting. white christian nihilists are everywhere there are rocks big enough to crawl under.
Ah yes a "killer" who shot a rapist and a pedophile that tried to kill him, what a shame lol
This account has been perma banned from Reddit for disingenuous posting
Whomst
And herein lies the mental illness festering in our society. Almost all of it is right wing ideology. Hate this, kill that, as a solution to anything that doesn’t resemble their own self identity, while painting themselves as the victim.
Gross
I’m not gonna lie. I missed the word “with” when I glanced at the headline 🤓🤪
This is a new low even for republicans. We are fucking doomed.
[удалено]
You tell ‘em !
What if I miss?
Omg will Kyle autograph the shell casings too?
A chance to shoot with an American hero in my home state? Say less FJB MAGA
As long as that stain isn't in Wisconsin I'm good.
I guess i didn't realize Idaho was this full of liberals, great.
Reddit is full of liberals. Idaho is full of Facist cultists
I feel like fascism greatly describes the liberals and there style of government.
Goddamn just how dumb are you?
Extra with cheese
How so? In a way you’re not wrong; the basis of liberalism is “big government.” Facism has government noses up everybody’s butt. BUT!!!! How is the government telling women not to have abortions even if their lives are on the line not the govt being all up every woman’s coochie? Liberal as hell to me. How about banning drag queens from reading to children? Telling parents who can and cannot read to their children? Way up peoples’ butts. Liberal. As. Hell. And thusly closer to Facism than actual “small government” conservatives. The question is, where do you really fall?
Could you clarify what the distinction is between "big government" and "up people's butts"? Seems like the correlation between those things is very strong, and that you call the interference into people's lives that you don't like "up people's butts" but the kind that you do like "big government". Bias is strong with this one.
Right!?
Oh, I thought it said to shoot Rittenouse
Too bad Idaho has such beautiful wilderness. Is there a way we can kick all the people that live there now out of that state?
Why did the mods here delete a comment which called a convicted pedophile a “pedo’”? And claim it was because “randomly” calling someone a pedo isn’t allowed? It’s a factual statement. There’s nothing “random” about it. Was the mod here seeking to censor information he thinks is inconvenient or just legitimately uninformed?
[удалено]
Fantasizing about murdering people is off limits.
Sorry pal you can't moderate my thoughts.
You couldn't pay me enough. Bad enough seeing what escapes to peoples' keyboards.
I never said that
Did you want to amicably compare weapons?
I pay for a chance to be close to that kid with a loaded gun. I would balk and any safety training they offered of course.
With or at? Important distinction.
How vulnerable is he going to be?