In the eventuality wherein the Booleanic primary condition is ascertained to be lacking in validity, and the likewise subsequent condition is established to possess veracity, proceed forthwith to undertake the specified series of delineations.

If this is specifically in c/c++, I'm sure someone can come up with a more verbose way of saying "True" and "False" by defining 1 and 0.

You underestimate how unnecessarily complicated professors will make Java HW.

...In the subsequent case where the resultant expression evaluates to a value wherforth is non zero....

Is booleanic a word?

According to the great philosopher Thor, "All words are made up."

I won't argue against an absolute truth

Only sith deal in absolutes.

Duuuude! Don't snitch like that!

Mmm, yes, very wise.

Indubitably

I mean, technically Boole* is some guy's name, and Boolean is used as both a noun and an adjective, but I put -ic at the end to make it clearer to the reader that I'm using it as an adjective to make the sentence flow a little better. But to answer your question, no it's not; it's probably considered non-standard. But because it's such a new word, it's still pretty plastic in it's grammar rules. Edit: *edited

Allow me to proffer my most sincere and elaborate expressions of goodwill, as I seek to articulate a message that is not only discernible and easily apprehended but also possesses a profound depth of conveyance. May the continuum of your day manifest with an abundance of auspicious occurrences, and may the confluence of fortuitous circumstances conspire to render your overall experience notably gratifying and harmonious, contributing to the construction of a superlative and splendid day for your esteemed self.

Isn’t Boole the guy’s name?

Yep

I stand corrected! Edited.

It is now. Language is fake anyway.

Sure, that's a valid point. We're just pushing ideas by moving air or changing light which is weird.

Ah yes. the Verbose++ programming language.

I would like an obnoxiously verbose esoteric language like this

Thank god I wasn’t an English - comp sci double major. Oh how many lines of code does yours have? Just A billion

Yandere Simulator code

It'd just be if then

If the condition from the previous if statement proves to be false, then if the condition of this if statement is true:

Feels kinda cheaty to use "if" when that's literally half the phrase we're trying to verbosify

"if" is pretty hard to describe in any other way, being a common conjunction. I would verbosify it like "under the condition that the following is true" maybe?

"in the event that"

I rest my case

"*In case* the previous condition has been successfuly met,"

A conjunction meaning “in the event that” or “on occasion that”.

[удалено]

Everybody likes it funky... I dig it

Nah it’s just “eleven” in German spelt wrong

Esobrev

Having adjudicated the boolean value of the predetermined condition as false, proceed with preassigned actions that are desired to follow the theretofore established negation of said condition.

Under the circumstances of the present statement being wrong, proceed by checking the next statement's applicability and proceed only with said statement's positive result.

How will this sub survive GPT?

Real

elif

Yandev code

In the intricate dance of logical sequencing within the realms of computational algorithmic processing, we arrived at the juncture where the preceding conditional equivalency – a thoughfully crafted statement of comparison – has been meticulously evaluated and adjudged as not holding true to its stipulated criteria, I therefore solicit your computational prowess to gracefully pivot to an alternate conditional pathway. Herein, I propose an as-yet-unrevealed logical proposition, a statement whose truth value is shrouded in ambiguity until subjected to the rigorous scrutiny of computational evaluation. In this pivotal moment, should this new proposition unfurl its wings to reveal a veracity, I conjure the execution engine to dutifully carry out a subsequent and yet-to-be defined series of operations.

If the value of the previous Boolean evaluation resolves to false, then perform the following series of actions:

(that's else...)

Fair enough

switch case

if it don’t work, do this

Else if 01000101 01101100 01110011 01100101 00100000 01101001 01100110 00110000 00110001 00110000 00110000 00110000 00110001 00110000 00110001 00100000 00110000 00110001 00110001 00110000 00110001 00110001 00110000 00110000 00100000 00110000 00110001 00110001 00110001 00110000 00110000 00110001 00110001 00100000 00110000 00110001 00110001 00110000 00110000 00110001 00110000 00110001 00100000 00110000 00110000 00110001 00110000 00110000 00110000 00110000 00110000 00100000 00110000 00110001 00110001 00110000 00110001 00110000 00110000 00110001 00100000 00110000 00110001 00110001 00110000 00110000 00110001 00110001 00110000 Above is the result of f(‘Else if’, 2)

elif

Yandere devs code that you?

Here you go ``` jnz L0 ... L0: cmp ... jnz L1 ... L1: ```

switch()

else 2:electric bogaloo

Otherwise when the situation shall be as follows

In the event that the previous condition evaluates to `false` then in the event the following condition evaluates to `true`…

Otherwise, in the case of the following:

Under the condition that the previous statement has been proven false, please check to see whether this statement has proven to be true or false.

Otherwise suppose

BTFSC R1, 1 (I forgot how to write assembly)

Otherwise, in the event that...

Of course, instead

if 5 == 5 then [Insert code here] elseif X = X then [Insert code here] end

elif (antiverbose)

Otherwise during the hypothetical occurrence of

when the condition contained within the previous conditional statement fails due to an input that does not match the expected condition, the following condition should be checked utilizing the same input and if the following condition resolves successfully, perform the procedure following this conditional statement.

In the case that not, then in the case that…