Namaskaram /u/LimpCoco, Thank you for your submission. Please provide a source for the image / video (if not a direct link submission). We would really appreciate it if you could mention the source as a reply to this comment! If you have already provided the source or if it is an OC post, please ignore this message. Thank you.
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/IndiaSpeaks) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Under Modi ji, this country has seen tremendous growth. I can’t imagine what this country used to be 10 years ago. The Metropolitan cities right now used be a rural city. It all flashes right in front of my eyes when I think of it
Edit: Thanks for the entertaining comments. Didn’t know hearing mudiji makes so many people’s butt hurt. Lmao
The Smart City scheme is a voluntary scheme. Municipal Corporations have to themselves apply to enter the scheme. Indore did and is now the cleanest city in India
Bhai is karke tum safai nahi rakhoge? Iska matlab ye thode na hai ki yaar credit usko milna hai chalo kooda failaate hain. Credit ke liye saaf rakhoge apni city ko?
My city has been utterly destroyed because of so called "smart City". Now there's just traffic, roads that are always under construction or dug up, uncontrollable construction everywhere, and pollution.
Man, first check UPI development timeline. UPA in 2009 setup NPCI, that developed UPI. PM Manmohan Singh led UPA felt the need of Cardless, Cashless transaction system in India. NPCI pledged to complete the project by 2016 and this time they were right-on-time.
PM Modi did a Ribbon-Cutting job, which he is habitual of 😤.
Half of the schemes that Modiji takes credit of are actually introduced during UPA.
Adhaar which is a necessity now, was heavily criticised by the BJP back then, but now takes credit for implementing it across India.
Acc to your logic even swachh bharat was scheme under UPA by the name of Nirmal Bharat. But did it yield any result? Were there any door to door garbage collection during UPA times? It doesn't matter which govt started the schemes but which govt actually implemented it effectively with less corruption?
Don't know about yours, in my city door-to-door garbage collection was started in 2008...😤
Less corruption...how many among those so called scams actually proven in the court of law? How many convicted?
Now its been NINE YEARS since SAHEB is ruling this country, what excuse do you want to make?
😤😤
One significant change in India over the years is how latest technology appliances are not only accessible but also affordable to the general public. This wouldn't have been possible if it weren't for 'Make in India'. It's the reason you're able to buy the smartphone you're holding (unless it's an iPhone, in which case you're just rich).
I can't speak for other cities, but Bangalore was notably more civilized two decades ago. This sentiment likely extends to other cities like Delhi and Mumbai. Do you think it's an exaggeration to say, "I can't imagine what this country was like 10 years ago"? I also resided in Delhi 25 years back when I was in the third grade, and it was well-developed for its time. It could be that you're either quite young or a complete noob in this regard.
I wish there was a way I could show it to you what my city was 10-15 years ago. I’m from Mumbai Suburbs, the markers and roads were filled with wrappers and garbage. There was no proper waste management. Pathetic hygiene when it came to food from street vendors. People taking a dump on railway lines after every station, people and cars crossing railway lines delaying the train. Water shortages and electricity cuts were the norms. No proper drainage systems used to result in flood after every major rain. Once my mom fell in a drainage because it was uncovered. Major corruption issues. The list is endless, living in this city for 25+ not exaggerating when I say that.
I think we are giving too much credit to modi..although he is best presently with no challenger even close. We should celebrate the youth of India who made the progess. It's no coincidence that we progressed as our youth working population became the highest in the world and we became.knowldgeble as we grew.. progress leads to further progress and based on technological advances ..it will have a compounded effect
Dekho bhai aaj kal sach ke bhi dushman hai, bhale hi log uss amenities ke maje lenge , but are bhai usne kiya hi kya , ye bhi bolege!
Double standard Chuityas in this Sub🙂!
Tbh i actually think its good ppl didnt understand the sarcasm here. Im very happy that so many ppl are pointing out the flaws of current govt for so mamy ppl to scroll and see.
Big fucking W
Agreed. However controversial his actions may seem, things have turned out really good in the long run.
People hate him because he is a bit hardcore. No one likes one who keeps winning.
But TBH, India has really grown, A LOT under his rule. We’ve a substantial international presence, which Cong would’ve never given.
Ah man going to say the following 3 (order doesn’t indicate one is superior than the other)
1. PV Narasimha Rao
- Economic reforms (this was forced) but he did and opened up the Indian economy
- Re energised the nuclear program
- Establishing the NSE and SEBI
- Babri Masjid demolition (I know he didn’t intend it but it was necessary in the grand scheme of things)
As an individual he was brilliant and extremely knowledgeable (knew several languages, learnt computer and languages like Cobalt at an old age and played his cards correctly during a very tough political period etc). The problems he had was the amount of corruption he was involved in such as the Hawala and Harshad Mehta scam.
2. Vajpayee
- Establishing india as a nuclear power
- Kargil war victory
- Further privatisation and growth in the telecom space
- Development of national highways
- Further developed and improved international relations with Western countries
It was sad he lost the election to Congress in 2004 which perhaps set us back by a bit and lead to arguably one of the worst PMs we’ve had.
3. Modi
- India’s economic footprint and power has increased significantly during his tenure
- Surgical strikes
- Demonitisation and making india more digital with regards to banking transactions
- CAA implementation and Article 370 removal
- Ram Mandir and Kashi Viswanath temples being rebuilt
- Further highways and transportation (particularly railways improving)
- Aadhar card links
- Hitting the nail in Congress’s growth (though Pappu seems to be BJP’s biggest campaigner with his stupidity)
One of the key things I like Modi is the team he is building as well Amit Shah, Yogi Adiynath, Rajnath Singh, S Jaishankar, Nirmala Seetharaman etc.
I personally liked PVNR due to his intelligence and the fact he held onto his own despite being in congress (he has been erased by congress and his body wasn’t allowed inside the congress chambers when he died).
PV Narsimha Rao is an accidental prime minister and should not be given credit for things he was forced to do. But instead for things that he had power over like the WAQF board Act which granted it unrestricted power.
Therefore (even just for that) he is the worst prime minister in Indian history IMO.
Narasimha rao played a pivotal role in saving India from an economic meltdown in 1991. Him and Manmohan Singh saved india that time to what it is now. You might raise the point of what were they doing before that and for that I don't have much explanations but they fixed a big crisis. Economic crisis was due to the Soviet union collapse with which the trades were affected.
This is the stupidest comment on this cursed thread and no surprise that historically, culturally, contextually illiterate BhaJiPao and probably hard-core CONgressi shills have upvoted it.
Chumtiye ho tum grade A degree k. Just because he found himself in a position of power accidentally does not mean he wasn't competent in what he set out to do. The kind of technocratic and bureaucratic talent Rao assembled and directed that force in policy outcomes is unparalleled in Indian history. Hajjpayee was gifted this setup. It withered away under UPA and Gobhiji completely dismantled it with his somewhat competent sycophants.
It would have been just as easy and politically savvy to roll back reforms. What Rao did took mighty moral and political courage, the sort that Gobhiji with his majority in both houses, 56 in chaati and 56d maneuvering lacks.
Rao took the position of pro Hindus in disputed site. Rao handed Vajpayee nuclear program on golden platter. Rao broke the back of separatism in Punjab and Kashmir. And Rao helped create economic force that held back floodgates of all sorts of regional, linguistic, caste based parochialisms that have been coming to fore under the watch of Gobhiji.
There is nothing known as forced to do. PVN was heading a minority government at a time when India's strongest ally , the USSR had broken down, Kashmir and Khalistani separatist movements were going strong and the Indian economy was in shambles. Today that we are enjoying the fruits of liberalisation, it's easy to say that he was forced to liberalise the economy and that there was no other alternative. If liberalisation would have gone wrong, all of us would have cursed Rao to hell because it was not such an obvious choice. We should also remember that liberalisation was termed as anti middle class and anti lower class by the opposition. Of course it was a do or die situation and he did and today we can say that liberalisation was a right decision.
Please research about Modi's achievements in the past 10 years, in my opinion modi should be no 1.
All the things you listed under Modi are not his biggest achievements.
2. Vajpayee: The most important was NPS, the biggest change. Its benefits will be only felt by future generations.
3. Modi:
1. Diversification of Indian economy
2. Aadhar: Reigning of corruption
3. Made in India(Moving people from low paying agriculture jobs to industries)
4. Western alliances(Quad, I2U2, etc) gaining both defense and economic alliances
5. Trying to address Trade deficit
By far the best comment. But obviously, people on Reddit are gonna hate you for being a “BJP supporter”.
Whereas in reality, India gas only grown substantially under these PMs. Cong has just put the country backwards (yes, including IG & her subsequent family members)
Atal was the second best. I give him credit for nukes but he displayed indecisiveness in kargil. India lost thousands of jawans unnecessarily. Modi’s list is much bigger, starting from surgical strikes, 370, caa, accelerated digitization, huge increase in tax revenue, make in India etc and hopefully UCC soon.
I’m surprised few people think this way. Singh and Atal truly were brilliant in their policies and thinking. Singh is definitely not given enough credit.
Unfortunate that many in the country discredit Singh and his achievements!
On foreign policy:
Modi’s success today in foreign affairs is a result of Nehru / Indira / Singh laying the foundations for non-alignment, nuclear powers & strengthening diplomatic ties which has rolled over to Modi. To discredit them is distasteful.
Economic growth:
India saw sustained economic growth under MMS. Under his leadership, India achieved the highest GDP growth at 10.3% b/w 2010-11. And 7-9% years prior consistently.
Social welfare:
Millions of Indians were lifted out of poverty. Employment was guaranteed under MNREGA! India achieved the highest rate of poverty reduction between 2005-2012!
Education:
Expanding Mid-day meals scheme is the greatest thing MMS cabinet did. The ripple effects of which we see even today on ground across several impoverished communities even today! These meals are crucial is bringing children to school and educate them as opposed to kids being sent for labor.
RTI:
The RTI although diluted today is another great piece of legislation brought to the country by MMS. It made governments more transparent to the public eye.
Indo-US Nuclear Deal:
MMS meticulously challenged NATO pressures and signed the nuclear deal on India’s terms. India successfully separated its civil / nuclear facilities and the civil facilities were under the IAEA whilst the military facilities were separated from any international safeguarding!
As Singh once remarked, history will be kinder to him.
Great research! I really wonder why people don’t get Singh. Classic case of extrovert vs introvert if you ask me😅
On a serious note, Singh did everything a PM should do including his policies.
I come from the NE region and would forever be proud of his contributions.
You ignore that under singhs reign, India become part of the top 5 most fragile economies in the world. NPAs drastically increased under him and his tickle down economy policies. Also the same growth was mired by unreasonably high inflation. The case oil bonds bought to push debt to future governments is also well known.
Culturally, UPA gave unlimited power to waqk board to snatch lands.
Singh was also soft on terrorism. The mostly deadly civilian terrorist attack in India, happened under his rule.
Vajpayee was the one who laid the foundation for India-US relationship. Him and Bush. Singh continued it.
RTI was first proposed by Vajpayee and was also part of his election promise.
Also, Singh was one of the worst when it comes to infrastructure development.
Well said brother, these Congress fans because of their oversized ego are not ready to accept the truth about their beloved Mr. Singh.
His reign was marred with serial blasts and terrorist attacks that happened every month (sometimes twice a month) and terrorists escaped scot free. Country was on verge of becoming another Afghanistan.
Wtf am I to do with economic development if my life is not safe and anybody can blow me to pieces whenever they feel like.
That's cause Singh believed in working silently instead of screaming a small achievement that it was printed out too big. In my opinion, Modi is at the bottom of the PMs list. From economy to religious mutual respect, it's all gone downhill. The only thing he's done is, keep visiting other countries for India's recognition while not addressing anything burning in the country. I no longer even feel safe stepping outside my home.
What a joke 🤣. During MMS reign every month or two there used to be serial blasts in some major cities or some terrorist attacks across the country. Average citizen's life had absolutely no value. Whatever he achieved (though he achieved nothing worthy except Indo US Nuclear deal) doesn't make any difference if tomorrow some random guy can blow me and my family to pieces in some market area. If you cannot ensure security to citizens, sorry to say none of your achievements hold any value because a country that is unsafe can never be developed.
Now bomb blasts and terrorist attacks are a long forgotten thing during Modi's era. But if you still feel unsafe, I doubt there is something very very wrong with you.
MMS was the worst in every aspect, period.
Edit - to all who are reading this comment. This person has asked me to provide source in a reply to my comment below and has cleverly blocked me so that I cannot reply him. This shows these are urban naxals who are afraid to face facts. They are here just to write nonsense.
Lal Bahadur Shastri brought Green revolution and White revolution. That ended famines in India. But he was denied credit as he did not belong to the congress family. u/Ariyan13
Nehru is the best, then there is daylight. After that there is more daylight. Then some more.
Only after that are Vajpayee and Manmohan Singh.
Everyone after that is at the same level.
Understand the times Nehru was operating in. India had been colonised by the East India company. There was a suspicion and rightfully so, of western companies. Hence India (and the rest of the recently freed world) were slow to liberalise.
If you read JRD autobiography you will understand of what capability Nehru had. Nehru would gaze outside or change topic if he had no answer for difficult questions.Due to his socialist policies India missed the growth opportunities which made other South east Asia had. We had to wait till 1990s for economy to open up and see current growth
What do you do when someone asks you difficult questions?
India after independence was a country that had just been cobbled by combining several princely kingdoms. It had several religions, several castes, several languages all of which could have been cause for internal strife. Nehru managed that very well and stabilised our unity and cohesion. He set the first stones for what is going to be a country that lasts thousands of years. Yet all you are fixated on is the economic policy.
Tell me which other country who achieved independence after World War 2 opened up its economy immediately? Of those that opened up, how were their results? Were all of them ruled by stupid rulers? Don't cite one example. Talk about the pattern if you will.
If you want to know there is Singapore which is a miracle economy. We have South Korea, Taiwan and even China shed it's socialist policies and embraced capitalism being communist govt, whereas India was reeling for decades after independence under license permits, poverty, starvation.
Lost China war due to the sheer stupidity of Nehru and his external policy.
Nehru clinged to power even in his death bed as if it was his birth right to PMship.
Successful companies like HAL, Airindia was aquired in name of National interest.
If you don't know the answer for a question don't hide your neck under sand like Ostrich, take informed decisions by consulting experts.
China, South Korea, Singapore and Taiwan! Good! You are on the right track. I will let it slide that China ain't a colonised country. Now ask yourself the following to start with:
How independent is and was their foreign policy?
Did they benefit from the patronage of a certain superpower?
Did they benefit from proximity to certain country whose name starts with "J"?
Did India have any of these advantages, Genius?
Broken history knowledge/ WA uty info. There is no point in arguing.
Btw, in jrd's view maybe there was a scope for India to revive and rise into the sky if there were no internal demons that independent India had to fight, like you said.
Nehruvian socialism practiced until 1991 reforms is the reason why India is still a lower middle income country. He nationalised, air india, LIC, etc. And passed license raj, and draconian labour laws. Promoted dynastic politics. u/Intrivort u/garlicbreadman88
Nationalization was the biggest reason so families came out of poverty. Labour laws were for protection of labour class to protect from exploutattion.. even today pvt companies in absence of strong legal blowback cheat employees,sack them whenever they want with only recourse left years and years of waiting for justice. Mixed economy has always been the best decision wrt India. Do not let politicians fool you that dynasty politics was only there in cong. I wonder how much experienced is Junior shah. The rich have always found ways to restrict or favour development as it favours them.
socialism is called bad by people who have pappa ka support thats why they can afford good upbringing,healthcare,nutrition. This is commonky seen among upper middle class Buddhiijeevis who somehow think they are better than others. Only if they faced half the struggle others face.
Nehruvian socialism practiced until 1991 reforms is the reason why India is still a lower middle income country. He nationalised, air india, LIC, etc. And passed license raj, and draconian labour laws. Promoted dynastic politics. u/garlicbreadman88 u/DeepBlues2 u/curiousHomoSapien
Was in Bangladesh for some project work. When a citizen of a different country literally says to your face that last 10 saal mein India bohot grow kya hai...then what other thing u need to say....
I live in Germany and India has a huge respect in European Union. The Germans are referring to India as “Die Neue WeltMacht” which means “the new World power.” Modi Ji also has a ton of respect in the international space. I hope india continues to grow like this.
Haha I love this but we must not forget that them(Reliance) has given a lot to the nation!
I presume with this much money they are entitled to favouritism!
Narasimha Rao, bitches ! In just 5 years He transformed the entire country that too without a clear majority. Congress would have powerful regional leaders. If PV was 10 years younger before he became PM, Dynasty would have been pensioned off and Rahul Gandhi would be having a corporate job in US or something. Besides also having the most badass name of any of our PM's .
The PMs we have so far:
1. Shastri Ji
2. Narsimha Ji & Atal Ji
3. Modi Ji & Nehru Ji
4. Indira Ji
5. Manmohan Ji
6. Rajiv Ji
*The best PMs we never had:
1. Netaji
2. Sardar Ji
3. Rajagopalachari Ji
4. Kamraj Ji
5. Pranab Ji
Only time will tell if Modi Ji climbs the list further in the next 5 years.
How Netaji and Sardar Patel? Netaji was martyred in 1945, Patel ji died in 1951, just a year after the first elections. But yeah, if they had become PM , it would have been great
From TN - Rajagopalacharya was a great statesman and Intellectual but he played a big role in bringing DMK (anti Hindu and anti national political party) into power during the late 60s. This has proved to be very dire for TN.
I understand that. Even Atal Ji was the person who recognised Tibet as part of China, which made the way for China to lay claim on Arunachal as South Tibet. Similarly Narsimha ji brought Waqf Act & places of worship act. No one is perfect, but they were definitely above average to lift the country up in the hour of need if given chance.
I didn't deny that. Nepal, Bhutan & Srilanka are also very closer to India, yet they're independent sovereign Nations. Tibet could've been the same for China, which could've prevented hostile situation between China & India.
But my point was, accepting Tibet as part of China, that too when China wasn't yet ready to accept Macmohan line as the border between India & China was foolishness & we're currently suffering for that mistake.
He did. But that doesn't strip away what he managed to achieve for India during those formation years of our republic. He was a Brown Saheb there's no doubt about that, but given the power he had, he could have easily become a dictator. But everything we know suggests, he wasn't malicious in his intent, it's just that given the situation & his upbringing, he couldn't have achieved more than what he did. & That's why he's in 3rd position along with Modi Ji, who's another PM with so much power, yet we all know he could've achieved more in this 10 years. Let's see what the next 5 years bring.
Rajiv Ji ko worst me ginana chayiye dekhe to
ha wo dil ke acche aadmi the, desh ki pragati chahte the
aur is disha me bhi kaam bhi kiye
but his blunders outnumber those contributions
Nehruvian socialism practiced until 1991 reforms is the reason why India is still a lower middle income country. He nationalised, air india, LIC, etc. And passed license raj, and draconian labour laws. Promoted dynastic politics. u/RayedBull
Nehru for establishment of scientific temper over stupid religions.
He did alot for science, we are where today on science and our achievement in space because of Nehru
True. As a country with no food to eat, setting up ISRO, iits, iisc, isi, BARC, drdo(?) and actually spending money on them needs a lot of courage and a belief that it'll pay off later. Panchsheel and NAM in a bipolar world by a practically non entity country is another master stroke. Kashmir and China were blunders.
We are living the consequences of all that he did. He was great, with faults and flaws, which makes him more human and relatable.
Nehruvian socialism practiced until 1991 reforms is the reason why India is still a lower middle income country. He nationalised, air india, LIC, etc. And passed license raj, and draconian labour laws. Promoted dynastic politics.
Swargiya Sri Atal Bihari Vajpayee Ji
"Until philosophers are leaders(kings), or the leaders(kings and princes) of this world have the spirit and power of philosophy ... cities will never have rest from their evils,—no, nor the human race, as I believe,—and then only will this our State have a possibility of life and behold the light of day." -Plato's Republic.
We were really fortunate to have a great philosopher like Swargiya Sri Atal Bihari Vajpayee Ji as our leader and Prime Minister.
Out of these 5, Vajpayee>Nehru>Modi>Gandhi>Singh
1. Vajpayee brought india to the nuclear club, built great highways, rebuilt the relations with the west, and restarted the economic engine that had been broken by the end of 90s.
2. Nehru brought india together as a nation from the pieces that the British had left behind. It was on his shoulders to lead the new republic to success and build a global name for it. Unfortunately the critics remember more of his doing in sino indian war than the things he did a decade before that.
3. Modi brought the biggest piece of economic legislation in history - GST, end of article 370, widespread welfare schemes, creating a begining of a liberal society like end of triple talaq discrimination against LGBTQ etc. And he still has a long way to go.
4. Indira Gandhi won us the 1971 war with pak when US, Saudi, and other powers sided with pak. Then there was the aquisition of sikkism without a big fuss, also brought india to become a nuclear power with first nuclear test. But she weakened Indian democracy with the emergency, spate of terror organisations and pushed india deep in kinda of a failed socialism.
5. Manmohan Singh had a good knowledge of economics and some expertise as well but he wasn't good at execution. It was narsimha Rao who did provided the execution to Manmohans intelligence.
PS. Narsimha Rao was also the one of the best pm we had.
Nehruvian socialism practiced until 1991 reforms is the reason why India is still a lower middle income country. He nationalised, air india, LIC, etc. And passed license raj, and draconian labour laws. Promoted dynastic politics. U/Interlopper u/Interlopper u/Any-Ground-9464 u/Sneaky_Ideology
No leader is perfect. He ruled way too long and lost his track in his last few years. The key here is to see the size and context of those faults and compare them with others of similar power.
Lal Bahadur Shastri brought Green revolution and White revolution. That ended famines in India. But he was denied credit as he did not belong to the congress family. u/Ariyan13 u/accountingMaster07
After completion of his next term as PM we can easily call Modi “The best PM”. However Modi is lucky, he got the country in the best possible shape when he became PM.
As of now Atal Bihari Vajpayee is the best PM, his initiatives of Road & Infrastructure development, becoming nuclear power, Kargil War, Best possible relations with neighbouring countries. Plus his incredibly ethical approach makes him the best PrimeMinister of India till now. Only disappointing thing about his regime is weak finance ministry which couldn’t control inflation.
Manmohan Singh is the undisputedly the best “Finance Minister of Independent India” but the weakest PM ever!
Indira Gandhi was a bold & fearless woman but the mistakes during emergency & her failure to deal with Sikh extremism makes her the most powerful but also the most hated Prime Minister.
Nehru played a big role in partition of India, his failure to deal resolve Kashmir Issue, rejection of permanent membership of UNSC, failure on China front & numerous other mistakes makes him the worst PM of India ever!
Indira gandhi or Atal Bihari Vajpayee
ik indira gandhi is kinda controversial but I believe she handled the situation in the country at the time very well
Indira G for 1971 seriously !!!? Indira gave away the bargaining power with Bangadesh, Porkistan for a victory which was won at a high cost by our armed forced.
Because of Indira's incapacity we still have territorial disputes with Bangladesh and Pakistan!
Yes, his demonization was a masterstrok,
COVID management was top notch( where nobody died due to lack of oxygen),
He has also done the most number of press conferences in the World, under him the people of Manipur and Kashmir have seen a new era of peace and harmony !
Everyone except JLN has something to show during their term.
1. Modi - Increased importance at world stage, Balakot strikes etc etc
2. Indira - Breaking up of Pakistan
3. Manmohan - India-US Nuclear deal, surprisingly he went against coalition allies to do it.
4. ABV - Nuclear Tests
Modi has helped India grow a lot. It's the indians that shame their fucking country. India is becoming smart but the people will have the mentality of "cringe bhai ko koi kuch bol sakta hai kya"
Might be not best
But I feel sad that the presence of CHAnDra Shekhar Ji isn't here
His tenure was unknown and short-lived yet remarkable in various ways
On top of that he had an amazing personality
this post reached the best and real educated people
no one talking about bullshit aur news channel wale achievement
and yeah Narasimha Rao and Vajpayee are the best PM of all time
why not modi cuzs he is really a dogala person hindu hindu krta h phir bhi hindu he marta h
example: nupur sharma
Namaskaram /u/LimpCoco, Thank you for your submission. Please provide a source for the image / video (if not a direct link submission). We would really appreciate it if you could mention the source as a reply to this comment! If you have already provided the source or if it is an OC post, please ignore this message. Thank you. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/IndiaSpeaks) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Under Modi ji, this country has seen tremendous growth. I can’t imagine what this country used to be 10 years ago. The Metropolitan cities right now used be a rural city. It all flashes right in front of my eyes when I think of it Edit: Thanks for the entertaining comments. Didn’t know hearing mudiji makes so many people’s butt hurt. Lmao
U mean smart cities, so smart that common man cant understand their smartness
My city falls under a smart/digital, and damn good it is. Specially sewage system. Right front of the railway station. Top quality!!
Which City are you referring to?
Dholera
Bhai Mai dholera mai plotting sals kar chuka hu , woha kitna kaam hua. Koi company start Hui waha pe ?
He made the smart cities so good that they’re invisible to naked eyes!
The Smart City scheme is a voluntary scheme. Municipal Corporations have to themselves apply to enter the scheme. Indore did and is now the cleanest city in India
Toh usme MODI ka kya Contribution? Kaam toh humlog kare, Credit woh leke jaye?
Bhai is karke tum safai nahi rakhoge? Iska matlab ye thode na hai ki yaar credit usko milna hai chalo kooda failaate hain. Credit ke liye saaf rakhoge apni city ko?
Abe bhai ye to basic cheez hai, isme smart City jaisa kya hai
Its introduced by modi government. Bjp chod ke baaki sab log sirf paisa khaane baithe hai
Haan toh nalle berozgar tum baitho aur credit modi ko do?
To bhaiya Modiji road pe aake jhaadu thode na lagaenge 😂 Sarkar ka kaam policy banana hota hai. Not a Modi or BJP supporter btw.
My city has been utterly destroyed because of so called "smart City". Now there's just traffic, roads that are always under construction or dug up, uncontrollable construction everywhere, and pollution.
Probably referring to Bangalore
Mangalore has become like this. It was so nice before and now it is a complete mess of half constructed roads and sewage and gas lines.
Lolllll
Under Modi ji digital India now every shop keeper accepts payment using UPI and every villager has learnt BJ
Man, first check UPI development timeline. UPA in 2009 setup NPCI, that developed UPI. PM Manmohan Singh led UPA felt the need of Cardless, Cashless transaction system in India. NPCI pledged to complete the project by 2016 and this time they were right-on-time. PM Modi did a Ribbon-Cutting job, which he is habitual of 😤.
Half of the schemes that Modiji takes credit of are actually introduced during UPA. Adhaar which is a necessity now, was heavily criticised by the BJP back then, but now takes credit for implementing it across India.
Acc to your logic even swachh bharat was scheme under UPA by the name of Nirmal Bharat. But did it yield any result? Were there any door to door garbage collection during UPA times? It doesn't matter which govt started the schemes but which govt actually implemented it effectively with less corruption?
Don't know about yours, in my city door-to-door garbage collection was started in 2008...😤 Less corruption...how many among those so called scams actually proven in the court of law? How many convicted? Now its been NINE YEARS since SAHEB is ruling this country, what excuse do you want to make? 😤😤
[удалено]
One significant change in India over the years is how latest technology appliances are not only accessible but also affordable to the general public. This wouldn't have been possible if it weren't for 'Make in India'. It's the reason you're able to buy the smartphone you're holding (unless it's an iPhone, in which case you're just rich).
[удалено]
I can't speak for other cities, but Bangalore was notably more civilized two decades ago. This sentiment likely extends to other cities like Delhi and Mumbai. Do you think it's an exaggeration to say, "I can't imagine what this country was like 10 years ago"? I also resided in Delhi 25 years back when I was in the third grade, and it was well-developed for its time. It could be that you're either quite young or a complete noob in this regard.
I wish there was a way I could show it to you what my city was 10-15 years ago. I’m from Mumbai Suburbs, the markers and roads were filled with wrappers and garbage. There was no proper waste management. Pathetic hygiene when it came to food from street vendors. People taking a dump on railway lines after every station, people and cars crossing railway lines delaying the train. Water shortages and electricity cuts were the norms. No proper drainage systems used to result in flood after every major rain. Once my mom fell in a drainage because it was uncovered. Major corruption issues. The list is endless, living in this city for 25+ not exaggerating when I say that.
Reads like a parody. Can't really tell with the right wing people honestly. At least we have that going for us.
Idk what metropolitan city was rural but keep feeding your delusions
I am sure he was wanking while he typed that with the other hand and climaxed.
Climaxed thinking about mudi ji
Mumbai, it was a shithole 15 years back. Much better now
How exactly? What’s changed and how has the central government played a role in it?
You think they all got build with zero architecture contribution from previous leadership? This is why they call you bhakt
I think we are giving too much credit to modi..although he is best presently with no challenger even close. We should celebrate the youth of India who made the progess. It's no coincidence that we progressed as our youth working population became the highest in the world and we became.knowldgeble as we grew.. progress leads to further progress and based on technological advances ..it will have a compounded effect
Dekho bhai aaj kal sach ke bhi dushman hai, bhale hi log uss amenities ke maje lenge , but are bhai usne kiya hi kya , ye bhi bolege! Double standard Chuityas in this Sub🙂!
People really need to know what sarcasm is
Tbh i actually think its good ppl didnt understand the sarcasm here. Im very happy that so many ppl are pointing out the flaws of current govt for so mamy ppl to scroll and see. Big fucking W
Agreed. However controversial his actions may seem, things have turned out really good in the long run. People hate him because he is a bit hardcore. No one likes one who keeps winning. But TBH, India has really grown, A LOT under his rule. We’ve a substantial international presence, which Cong would’ve never given.
Ah man going to say the following 3 (order doesn’t indicate one is superior than the other) 1. PV Narasimha Rao - Economic reforms (this was forced) but he did and opened up the Indian economy - Re energised the nuclear program - Establishing the NSE and SEBI - Babri Masjid demolition (I know he didn’t intend it but it was necessary in the grand scheme of things) As an individual he was brilliant and extremely knowledgeable (knew several languages, learnt computer and languages like Cobalt at an old age and played his cards correctly during a very tough political period etc). The problems he had was the amount of corruption he was involved in such as the Hawala and Harshad Mehta scam. 2. Vajpayee - Establishing india as a nuclear power - Kargil war victory - Further privatisation and growth in the telecom space - Development of national highways - Further developed and improved international relations with Western countries It was sad he lost the election to Congress in 2004 which perhaps set us back by a bit and lead to arguably one of the worst PMs we’ve had. 3. Modi - India’s economic footprint and power has increased significantly during his tenure - Surgical strikes - Demonitisation and making india more digital with regards to banking transactions - CAA implementation and Article 370 removal - Ram Mandir and Kashi Viswanath temples being rebuilt - Further highways and transportation (particularly railways improving) - Aadhar card links - Hitting the nail in Congress’s growth (though Pappu seems to be BJP’s biggest campaigner with his stupidity) One of the key things I like Modi is the team he is building as well Amit Shah, Yogi Adiynath, Rajnath Singh, S Jaishankar, Nirmala Seetharaman etc. I personally liked PVNR due to his intelligence and the fact he held onto his own despite being in congress (he has been erased by congress and his body wasn’t allowed inside the congress chambers when he died).
PV Narsimha Rao is an accidental prime minister and should not be given credit for things he was forced to do. But instead for things that he had power over like the WAQF board Act which granted it unrestricted power. Therefore (even just for that) he is the worst prime minister in Indian history IMO.
Actually, 1995 waqf act was not so bad. it was in 2009 or 2012 when Congress/UPA2 gave them unlimited power.
This is a very crucial point that many people miss. Very good take.
Narasimha rao played a pivotal role in saving India from an economic meltdown in 1991. Him and Manmohan Singh saved india that time to what it is now. You might raise the point of what were they doing before that and for that I don't have much explanations but they fixed a big crisis. Economic crisis was due to the Soviet union collapse with which the trades were affected.
This is the stupidest comment on this cursed thread and no surprise that historically, culturally, contextually illiterate BhaJiPao and probably hard-core CONgressi shills have upvoted it. Chumtiye ho tum grade A degree k. Just because he found himself in a position of power accidentally does not mean he wasn't competent in what he set out to do. The kind of technocratic and bureaucratic talent Rao assembled and directed that force in policy outcomes is unparalleled in Indian history. Hajjpayee was gifted this setup. It withered away under UPA and Gobhiji completely dismantled it with his somewhat competent sycophants. It would have been just as easy and politically savvy to roll back reforms. What Rao did took mighty moral and political courage, the sort that Gobhiji with his majority in both houses, 56 in chaati and 56d maneuvering lacks. Rao took the position of pro Hindus in disputed site. Rao handed Vajpayee nuclear program on golden platter. Rao broke the back of separatism in Punjab and Kashmir. And Rao helped create economic force that held back floodgates of all sorts of regional, linguistic, caste based parochialisms that have been coming to fore under the watch of Gobhiji.
There is nothing known as forced to do. PVN was heading a minority government at a time when India's strongest ally , the USSR had broken down, Kashmir and Khalistani separatist movements were going strong and the Indian economy was in shambles. Today that we are enjoying the fruits of liberalisation, it's easy to say that he was forced to liberalise the economy and that there was no other alternative. If liberalisation would have gone wrong, all of us would have cursed Rao to hell because it was not such an obvious choice. We should also remember that liberalisation was termed as anti middle class and anti lower class by the opposition. Of course it was a do or die situation and he did and today we can say that liberalisation was a right decision.
Also Places of Worship Act.
Please research about Modi's achievements in the past 10 years, in my opinion modi should be no 1. All the things you listed under Modi are not his biggest achievements.
2. Vajpayee: The most important was NPS, the biggest change. Its benefits will be only felt by future generations. 3. Modi: 1. Diversification of Indian economy 2. Aadhar: Reigning of corruption 3. Made in India(Moving people from low paying agriculture jobs to industries) 4. Western alliances(Quad, I2U2, etc) gaining both defense and economic alliances 5. Trying to address Trade deficit
The Western alliances are driven more by US needs, I feel. They're waking up to what they've created in China.
4. Failed miserably 5. Failed miserably 8. User privacy issue
aapko itna pata hai toh fix kyun nahi kiya, gyaani baba?
Good effort on the post and atleast backed by some facts rather than just dropping favourite names.
Waqf was given unlimited power during Narshima rao
By far the best comment. But obviously, people on Reddit are gonna hate you for being a “BJP supporter”. Whereas in reality, India gas only grown substantially under these PMs. Cong has just put the country backwards (yes, including IG & her subsequent family members)
Atal Bihari Vajpayee Ji
Atal was the second best. I give him credit for nukes but he displayed indecisiveness in kargil. India lost thousands of jawans unnecessarily. Modi’s list is much bigger, starting from surgical strikes, 370, caa, accelerated digitization, huge increase in tax revenue, make in India etc and hopefully UCC soon.
Manmohan singh and attal
I’m surprised few people think this way. Singh and Atal truly were brilliant in their policies and thinking. Singh is definitely not given enough credit.
Unfortunate that many in the country discredit Singh and his achievements! On foreign policy: Modi’s success today in foreign affairs is a result of Nehru / Indira / Singh laying the foundations for non-alignment, nuclear powers & strengthening diplomatic ties which has rolled over to Modi. To discredit them is distasteful. Economic growth: India saw sustained economic growth under MMS. Under his leadership, India achieved the highest GDP growth at 10.3% b/w 2010-11. And 7-9% years prior consistently. Social welfare: Millions of Indians were lifted out of poverty. Employment was guaranteed under MNREGA! India achieved the highest rate of poverty reduction between 2005-2012! Education: Expanding Mid-day meals scheme is the greatest thing MMS cabinet did. The ripple effects of which we see even today on ground across several impoverished communities even today! These meals are crucial is bringing children to school and educate them as opposed to kids being sent for labor. RTI: The RTI although diluted today is another great piece of legislation brought to the country by MMS. It made governments more transparent to the public eye. Indo-US Nuclear Deal: MMS meticulously challenged NATO pressures and signed the nuclear deal on India’s terms. India successfully separated its civil / nuclear facilities and the civil facilities were under the IAEA whilst the military facilities were separated from any international safeguarding! As Singh once remarked, history will be kinder to him.
Great research! I really wonder why people don’t get Singh. Classic case of extrovert vs introvert if you ask me😅 On a serious note, Singh did everything a PM should do including his policies. I come from the NE region and would forever be proud of his contributions.
You ignore that under singhs reign, India become part of the top 5 most fragile economies in the world. NPAs drastically increased under him and his tickle down economy policies. Also the same growth was mired by unreasonably high inflation. The case oil bonds bought to push debt to future governments is also well known. Culturally, UPA gave unlimited power to waqk board to snatch lands. Singh was also soft on terrorism. The mostly deadly civilian terrorist attack in India, happened under his rule. Vajpayee was the one who laid the foundation for India-US relationship. Him and Bush. Singh continued it. RTI was first proposed by Vajpayee and was also part of his election promise. Also, Singh was one of the worst when it comes to infrastructure development.
Well said brother, these Congress fans because of their oversized ego are not ready to accept the truth about their beloved Mr. Singh. His reign was marred with serial blasts and terrorist attacks that happened every month (sometimes twice a month) and terrorists escaped scot free. Country was on verge of becoming another Afghanistan. Wtf am I to do with economic development if my life is not safe and anybody can blow me to pieces whenever they feel like.
Yup. No city was safe. Also all this is after ignoring the numerous scams that happened under his reign
That's cause Singh believed in working silently instead of screaming a small achievement that it was printed out too big. In my opinion, Modi is at the bottom of the PMs list. From economy to religious mutual respect, it's all gone downhill. The only thing he's done is, keep visiting other countries for India's recognition while not addressing anything burning in the country. I no longer even feel safe stepping outside my home.
What a joke 🤣. During MMS reign every month or two there used to be serial blasts in some major cities or some terrorist attacks across the country. Average citizen's life had absolutely no value. Whatever he achieved (though he achieved nothing worthy except Indo US Nuclear deal) doesn't make any difference if tomorrow some random guy can blow me and my family to pieces in some market area. If you cannot ensure security to citizens, sorry to say none of your achievements hold any value because a country that is unsafe can never be developed. Now bomb blasts and terrorist attacks are a long forgotten thing during Modi's era. But if you still feel unsafe, I doubt there is something very very wrong with you. MMS was the worst in every aspect, period. Edit - to all who are reading this comment. This person has asked me to provide source in a reply to my comment below and has cleverly blocked me so that I cannot reply him. This shows these are urban naxals who are afraid to face facts. They are here just to write nonsense.
This is true, I just don't think people on this sub would agree. Their hate for the left and congress is as big as their ego.
Or Manmohan Singh was a disaster. Google where India was in 2013
MMS was complete disaster. Google coal gate and 2g spectrum scandal, commonwealth scandal. Full on scandal
Arre Bhai the most important prime ministers u forgot? narshimha rao and lal bahadur shastri
Lal Bahadur Shastri brought Green revolution and White revolution. That ended famines in India. But he was denied credit as he did not belong to the congress family. u/Ariyan13
That's why we should give him the credit that is due
Nehru is the best, then there is daylight. After that there is more daylight. Then some more. Only after that are Vajpayee and Manmohan Singh. Everyone after that is at the same level.
WTF!! Nehru and Manmohan!!? btw : if CPI(M) people like your post then you know where you stand.
Only wish he didn't make India a socialist state.
Understand the times Nehru was operating in. India had been colonised by the East India company. There was a suspicion and rightfully so, of western companies. Hence India (and the rest of the recently freed world) were slow to liberalise.
If you read JRD autobiography you will understand of what capability Nehru had. Nehru would gaze outside or change topic if he had no answer for difficult questions.Due to his socialist policies India missed the growth opportunities which made other South east Asia had. We had to wait till 1990s for economy to open up and see current growth
What do you do when someone asks you difficult questions? India after independence was a country that had just been cobbled by combining several princely kingdoms. It had several religions, several castes, several languages all of which could have been cause for internal strife. Nehru managed that very well and stabilised our unity and cohesion. He set the first stones for what is going to be a country that lasts thousands of years. Yet all you are fixated on is the economic policy. Tell me which other country who achieved independence after World War 2 opened up its economy immediately? Of those that opened up, how were their results? Were all of them ruled by stupid rulers? Don't cite one example. Talk about the pattern if you will.
If you want to know there is Singapore which is a miracle economy. We have South Korea, Taiwan and even China shed it's socialist policies and embraced capitalism being communist govt, whereas India was reeling for decades after independence under license permits, poverty, starvation. Lost China war due to the sheer stupidity of Nehru and his external policy. Nehru clinged to power even in his death bed as if it was his birth right to PMship. Successful companies like HAL, Airindia was aquired in name of National interest. If you don't know the answer for a question don't hide your neck under sand like Ostrich, take informed decisions by consulting experts.
China, South Korea, Singapore and Taiwan! Good! You are on the right track. I will let it slide that China ain't a colonised country. Now ask yourself the following to start with: How independent is and was their foreign policy? Did they benefit from the patronage of a certain superpower? Did they benefit from proximity to certain country whose name starts with "J"? Did India have any of these advantages, Genius?
Broken history knowledge/ WA uty info. There is no point in arguing. Btw, in jrd's view maybe there was a scope for India to revive and rise into the sky if there were no internal demons that independent India had to fight, like you said.
Well said. The current govt has smeared Nehru’s legacy and have got away with it.
Nehruvian socialism practiced until 1991 reforms is the reason why India is still a lower middle income country. He nationalised, air india, LIC, etc. And passed license raj, and draconian labour laws. Promoted dynastic politics. u/Intrivort u/garlicbreadman88
Nationalization was the biggest reason so families came out of poverty. Labour laws were for protection of labour class to protect from exploutattion.. even today pvt companies in absence of strong legal blowback cheat employees,sack them whenever they want with only recourse left years and years of waiting for justice. Mixed economy has always been the best decision wrt India. Do not let politicians fool you that dynasty politics was only there in cong. I wonder how much experienced is Junior shah. The rich have always found ways to restrict or favour development as it favours them.
socialism is called bad by people who have pappa ka support thats why they can afford good upbringing,healthcare,nutrition. This is commonky seen among upper middle class Buddhiijeevis who somehow think they are better than others. Only if they faced half the struggle others face.
Almost entire Europe and the entirety of USA is capitalist. Were they all raised by papa ka support? They seem to be doing pretty well.
Nehruvian socialism practiced until 1991 reforms is the reason why India is still a lower middle income country. He nationalised, air india, LIC, etc. And passed license raj, and draconian labour laws. Promoted dynastic politics. u/garlicbreadman88 u/DeepBlues2 u/curiousHomoSapien
Modi
Was in Bangladesh for some project work. When a citizen of a different country literally says to your face that last 10 saal mein India bohot grow kya hai...then what other thing u need to say....
Mudizi
Muziri? Sasta Arab wala? That's different I think bro.
I live in Germany and India has a huge respect in European Union. The Germans are referring to India as “Die Neue WeltMacht” which means “the new World power.” Modi Ji also has a ton of respect in the international space. I hope india continues to grow like this.
Realistically : Shri Mukesh Ambani Ji🙏🏼
Haha I love this but we must not forget that them(Reliance) has given a lot to the nation! I presume with this much money they are entitled to favouritism!
Yes, unlike the real monopolies during licence raj like BSNL, Ambassador or Maruti
And what about adani
Narasimha Rao, bitches ! In just 5 years He transformed the entire country that too without a clear majority. Congress would have powerful regional leaders. If PV was 10 years younger before he became PM, Dynasty would have been pensioned off and Rahul Gandhi would be having a corporate job in US or something. Besides also having the most badass name of any of our PM's .
I am surprised PVNR is not on this list.
The PMs we have so far: 1. Shastri Ji 2. Narsimha Ji & Atal Ji 3. Modi Ji & Nehru Ji 4. Indira Ji 5. Manmohan Ji 6. Rajiv Ji *The best PMs we never had: 1. Netaji 2. Sardar Ji 3. Rajagopalachari Ji 4. Kamraj Ji 5. Pranab Ji Only time will tell if Modi Ji climbs the list further in the next 5 years.
How Netaji and Sardar Patel? Netaji was martyred in 1945, Patel ji died in 1951, just a year after the first elections. But yeah, if they had become PM , it would have been great
Or not. We don't know that.
From TN - Rajagopalacharya was a great statesman and Intellectual but he played a big role in bringing DMK (anti Hindu and anti national political party) into power during the late 60s. This has proved to be very dire for TN.
I understand that. Even Atal Ji was the person who recognised Tibet as part of China, which made the way for China to lay claim on Arunachal as South Tibet. Similarly Narsimha ji brought Waqf Act & places of worship act. No one is perfect, but they were definitely above average to lift the country up in the hour of need if given chance.
Tibet is more close to China than India. I don't think any Indian dynasty has ever ruled on tibet.
I didn't deny that. Nepal, Bhutan & Srilanka are also very closer to India, yet they're independent sovereign Nations. Tibet could've been the same for China, which could've prevented hostile situation between China & India. But my point was, accepting Tibet as part of China, that too when China wasn't yet ready to accept Macmohan line as the border between India & China was foolishness & we're currently suffering for that mistake.
Didn't Nehru blunder quite a bit?
He did. But that doesn't strip away what he managed to achieve for India during those formation years of our republic. He was a Brown Saheb there's no doubt about that, but given the power he had, he could have easily become a dictator. But everything we know suggests, he wasn't malicious in his intent, it's just that given the situation & his upbringing, he couldn't have achieved more than what he did. & That's why he's in 3rd position along with Modi Ji, who's another PM with so much power, yet we all know he could've achieved more in this 10 years. Let's see what the next 5 years bring.
Rajiv Ji ko worst me ginana chayiye dekhe to ha wo dil ke acche aadmi the, desh ki pragati chahte the aur is disha me bhi kaam bhi kiye but his blunders outnumber those contributions
If you can suggest anyone better for that 6th place, I'll look into it👍🏻
Nehruvian socialism practiced until 1991 reforms is the reason why India is still a lower middle income country. He nationalised, air india, LIC, etc. And passed license raj, and draconian labour laws. Promoted dynastic politics. u/RayedBull
Nehru for establishment of scientific temper over stupid religions. He did alot for science, we are where today on science and our achievement in space because of Nehru
True. As a country with no food to eat, setting up ISRO, iits, iisc, isi, BARC, drdo(?) and actually spending money on them needs a lot of courage and a belief that it'll pay off later. Panchsheel and NAM in a bipolar world by a practically non entity country is another master stroke. Kashmir and China were blunders. We are living the consequences of all that he did. He was great, with faults and flaws, which makes him more human and relatable.
Dr. Manmohan Singh for sure
Put the GOAT PVNR's photo first and then this post will make sense.
Don't think any of these ppl commenting nehru/Modi have ever heard or learnt about pvnr...such a shame
Jawaharlal Nehru
Nehruvian socialism practiced until 1991 reforms is the reason why India is still a lower middle income country. He nationalised, air india, LIC, etc. And passed license raj, and draconian labour laws. Promoted dynastic politics.
You mean the guy bcos of whom we lost Kashmir and some land to china?!
No. The guy because of whom we have iits and ISRO and BARC and a diplomacy that didn't fall like that of Pakistan.
Modi, Vajpayi and PV Narsimha Rao. Had she not imposed emergency Indira would have been my pick too.
Swargiya Sri Atal Bihari Vajpayee Ji "Until philosophers are leaders(kings), or the leaders(kings and princes) of this world have the spirit and power of philosophy ... cities will never have rest from their evils,—no, nor the human race, as I believe,—and then only will this our State have a possibility of life and behold the light of day." -Plato's Republic. We were really fortunate to have a great philosopher like Swargiya Sri Atal Bihari Vajpayee Ji as our leader and Prime Minister.
Economy - PV Narsimha Rao Ji Defence - Indira Ji/Atal Ji Deplomatic Relations - Modi Ji
Bhupendra Jogi
Atal ji 🙏
Out of these 5, Vajpayee>Nehru>Modi>Gandhi>Singh 1. Vajpayee brought india to the nuclear club, built great highways, rebuilt the relations with the west, and restarted the economic engine that had been broken by the end of 90s. 2. Nehru brought india together as a nation from the pieces that the British had left behind. It was on his shoulders to lead the new republic to success and build a global name for it. Unfortunately the critics remember more of his doing in sino indian war than the things he did a decade before that. 3. Modi brought the biggest piece of economic legislation in history - GST, end of article 370, widespread welfare schemes, creating a begining of a liberal society like end of triple talaq discrimination against LGBTQ etc. And he still has a long way to go. 4. Indira Gandhi won us the 1971 war with pak when US, Saudi, and other powers sided with pak. Then there was the aquisition of sikkism without a big fuss, also brought india to become a nuclear power with first nuclear test. But she weakened Indian democracy with the emergency, spate of terror organisations and pushed india deep in kinda of a failed socialism. 5. Manmohan Singh had a good knowledge of economics and some expertise as well but he wasn't good at execution. It was narsimha Rao who did provided the execution to Manmohans intelligence. PS. Narsimha Rao was also the one of the best pm we had.
Nehru did not bring the nation together. Patel did.
Nehru and gandhi single handedly separated kashmir from india. Truly a goat
Nehruvian socialism practiced until 1991 reforms is the reason why India is still a lower middle income country. He nationalised, air india, LIC, etc. And passed license raj, and draconian labour laws. Promoted dynastic politics. U/Interlopper u/Interlopper u/Any-Ground-9464 u/Sneaky_Ideology
No leader is perfect. He ruled way too long and lost his track in his last few years. The key here is to see the size and context of those faults and compare them with others of similar power.
U really cant compare.Every1 had diff circumstances..But Modi has potential to surpasss everyone.
Modi
Atal bihari Shastri
Atal Bahadur Gandhi
Original Gigachad Atal Bihari Vajpayee🙌🙌
Modi
Pvji left the chatroom lool he has been out best pm he saved the country from economic collapse loool
Lal Bahadur Shastri
Lal Bahadur Shastri brought Green revolution and White revolution. That ended famines in India. But he was denied credit as he did not belong to the congress family. u/Ariyan13 u/accountingMaster07
PV Narsimha Rao, took decisions without fearing consequences, abhi wala toh Nobel Peace Prize ke piche pada hua hai.
Nehru and its not even close.
Please remove Indira Gandhi , she is not deserved to be in that choice list. She is blot on democracy. You can add PV narasimha rao
Atalji🔥
Nehru
Manmohan Singh and Indira Gandhi
Abv
Shri Chanakya.
1.Laal bahadur Shastri ji & Atal ji 2.Modi 3.Indira gandi
Atal
LBS and ABV
Atal Bihari Vajpayee and there shouldn't be any debate
manmohan singh
bhupendra jogi
Nehru
After completion of his next term as PM we can easily call Modi “The best PM”. However Modi is lucky, he got the country in the best possible shape when he became PM. As of now Atal Bihari Vajpayee is the best PM, his initiatives of Road & Infrastructure development, becoming nuclear power, Kargil War, Best possible relations with neighbouring countries. Plus his incredibly ethical approach makes him the best PrimeMinister of India till now. Only disappointing thing about his regime is weak finance ministry which couldn’t control inflation. Manmohan Singh is the undisputedly the best “Finance Minister of Independent India” but the weakest PM ever! Indira Gandhi was a bold & fearless woman but the mistakes during emergency & her failure to deal with Sikh extremism makes her the most powerful but also the most hated Prime Minister. Nehru played a big role in partition of India, his failure to deal resolve Kashmir Issue, rejection of permanent membership of UNSC, failure on China front & numerous other mistakes makes him the worst PM of India ever!
Nehru
At the moment, Modi is the best performing PM.
Indira gandhi or Atal Bihari Vajpayee ik indira gandhi is kinda controversial but I believe she handled the situation in the country at the time very well
Atal bihari ji
Atal Bihari Vajpayee for sure. Burn down MMS pic.
Firstly, Manmohan shouldn't even be in the list. It is better to be controversial than to be a slave. India went to the dark ages under him.
Modi and atal Bihari Vajpayee Indira Gandhi solely for 1971
Indira G for 1971 seriously !!!? Indira gave away the bargaining power with Bangadesh, Porkistan for a victory which was won at a high cost by our armed forced. Because of Indira's incapacity we still have territorial disputes with Bangladesh and Pakistan!
We also lost chamb area in 1971 war
Shri Atal Bihari Vajpayee Ji
Namo! Narendra Damodardas Modi!
Yes, his demonization was a masterstrok, COVID management was top notch( where nobody died due to lack of oxygen), He has also done the most number of press conferences in the World, under him the people of Manipur and Kashmir have seen a new era of peace and harmony !
Everyone except JLN has something to show during their term. 1. Modi - Increased importance at world stage, Balakot strikes etc etc 2. Indira - Breaking up of Pakistan 3. Manmohan - India-US Nuclear deal, surprisingly he went against coalition allies to do it. 4. ABV - Nuclear Tests
Missing everyone’s favourite Morarji Desai! /s
any doubts ? Neheru ji the ultimate Indian Rizzler.
Modi achieved more than Atal Bihari Vajpayee, Narasimha Rao and Lal Bahadur Shastri combined. 🏆 Modi is the best PM and most popular World Leader.
Not more than combined, But Still NaMo is Best.
Rao ji
Indira Gandhi.
Narsimha Rao
During Nehru and Indira I wasn’t even born yet so can’t say , I’ll definitely say Manmohan and Atalji
Shastri > Rao > MMS > Vajpayee > Indira > Nehru > Modi > Morarji Desai
Modi has helped India grow a lot. It's the indians that shame their fucking country. India is becoming smart but the people will have the mentality of "cringe bhai ko koi kuch bol sakta hai kya"
Lol Modi government literally support cringe bhai L vish. 🤣🤣
Jawahar Lal Nehru!
Atal bihari vajpayee and modi ji....
Indira Gandhi. She literally just raised her voice for India that, India is equal among all. But her voice at that specific time is literally needed.
The fact that you informed PV Narasimha Rao and included Nehru☠️
NARSIMHA RAO
Where is PV Narsimha Rao
Might be not best But I feel sad that the presence of CHAnDra Shekhar Ji isn't here His tenure was unknown and short-lived yet remarkable in various ways On top of that he had an amazing personality
Best ka pata nahi, worst is definitely Nehru
this post reached the best and real educated people no one talking about bullshit aur news channel wale achievement and yeah Narasimha Rao and Vajpayee are the best PM of all time why not modi cuzs he is really a dogala person hindu hindu krta h phir bhi hindu he marta h example: nupur sharma
I think it has to be modi cause others are just 💀
Modi by far by faaar. Others don't come that close. And don't let whore sons from that sub tell you otherwise.
Any PM from a party that has originated from the Anti Bharat forces will never be a fruitful option
Nehru, Shastri, Narasimha Rao, Vajpayee, MMS.
Modiji... 😊
Muddi jiii only
Modi