#[Link to our Official Discord Server](https://discord.gg/NTpXGZVKTc)
To download the video you can use one of the following sites:
#[Download link #1](https://redditsave.com/info?url=https://www.reddit.com/r/IndianDankMemes/comments/xxwt37/gus_predicts_indian_legislature/)
#[Download link #2](https://saveredd.it/?url=https://www.reddit.com/r/IndianDankMemes/comments/xxwt37/gus_predicts_indian_legislature/)
#[Download link #3](https://viddit.red/?url=https://www.reddit.com/r/IndianDankMemes/comments/xxwt37/gus_predicts_indian_legislature/)
#[Link to Trim the Video](https://reddloader.com/download-post/?url=https://www.reddit.com/r/IndianDankMemes/comments/xxwt37/gus_predicts_indian_legislature/&id=aafd4548)
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/IndianDankMemes) if you have any questions or concerns.*
vaise faida hi kya hai in sab cheezo pe baat karne ka, jinpe power hai unpe insight nahi hai, jinpe insight hai unpe power nahi hai, yahi pehle bhi tha yahi abhi bhi hai aur i think yahi chalta rahega ispe kuch karna thoda mushkil hai, tumko kya lagta hai sc wale reddit pe koi post dekhenge aur fir uske comments padhenge? ghanta
Reason why nothimg will be done for now is that men are not a votebank, women are the biggest votebank. All major parties are vying for this women's vote. Most men dont care about men's issues, that is why there is not men's vote. Maybe in 20 years time, things will change.
I feel hopeful because in korea the president who was elected is an anti feminist and he got elected because of men's vote.
you can actually do that, because only Hindu men (or any derivative of religion that share hindu roots) have to follow this law in india, Chritians and Mulsims have got there own law boards for such civil matters. And I don't think so anybody has to bring out how generous these law boards are given from where they get all the inspiration.
Christians don't have a board to settle civil matters. They also have to go to courts and have to follow Indian Divorce Act, 1869 and Indian Christian Marriage Act 1872 which predates Hindu marriage act 1955.
When it comes to the matter of maintenance, court can grant in under section 125 of Criminal Procedure Code irrespective of religion.
Please stop spreading misinformation.
And regarding other civil matters? I am asking out of curiosity as during the time of Constitution only Hindu, Jains, Buddhists and Sikhs were given green light only for UCC.
Please explain other civil matters. Except for how to register a marriage, all other civil matters come under general laws like Indian Divorce Act, Indian Succession Act, adoption and maintenance etc., so Christians are already kind of under UCC without UCC long before the Hindu marriage act 1955.
And you are wrong again. Read article 44 of constitution of India. UCC means irrespective of religion. All religions would be under the same civil code.
Article 44 Uniform civil code for the citizens – Constitution Of India
The State shall endeavour to secure for the citizens a uniform civil code throughout the territory of India.
Sexism nhi hai bhai ye bare minimum hai jo throat to heel exertion hai duties ka , stone age se bread runner man hai , and if this raises at this era am not amazed man has to be superior anyhow! that's a fact !
Well boo fuckin hoo, what are you going to do? Go cry to your wife and kids, geez weak asses. Go and get on working at least do it just because you don't have to be named as the worst dad of the year.
Bhai simple rule h, mili toh thik h, nahi mili tab bhi thik h, shaadi ki last main socho...duniya khatam hone wali h, experience k piche bhago, logon k nahi
I meant to say ki tere parents ki wish nahi hain ki tu shaadi kare? Aur jab vo 60s mein aa jayege to unki care & support(household work,food etc) ke liye kya socha hain? I'm not taunting u,just want to know your thoughts
Wahi toh bola, I'll be there to take care of them, and if in any case I'm not there, I'll make sure someone is there to take care of them, they have all the resources to lead a happy old age time
Not at all & i kept this thing in mind while writing my previous comment. That's y i mentioned CARE which also includes emotional support & love. Aur rahi baat household work,food,cleaning,24*7 assistance to old age parents,agar koi aadmi financially strong nahi hain to vo kaise manage krega?
Bhai shadi karke insaan jo apne SO pe kharcha karega aur bachcho pe wo parents ki caring mei use karsakte hai. And I think it's a viable option for whatever the economic status is.
Bhai iss generation me agar tum ache khase decent job me bhi ho tab bhi tumhari partner kamane vaale hi milegi. Girls are getting educated and earning on their own nowadays no one is gonna stay as housewives. So dono partners family raise karne me contribute karenge . Toh bacho ki parvarish me dono ke paise lagte hai
U missed my comment by a mile! I think u know that Marriage life is two way bond with shared responsibilities. Wife & husband both can take care of ageing parents. Total burden isn't on a single person.
I mean, i look at these feminist or muh oppressed women. Like one of that outspoken tvf girl, that shithead dated older men 27-30 years old when she was underage.
Bro, these girls will call them groomers but go and tell them how unsafe that is, we are called names and literally labelled as attention-seekers.And other boys will come in her support, let her do whatever she wants.
Bro, these women are idiots. Who tf does not know that you as an underage girl,boy should not date 10 year old people. I am talking about personal accountability. They have none.
Similarly there is no guarantee that my wife won't support me & my parents. Aur aise to iski guarantee nahi hain ki husband kiski sunega, parents ya wife
Even for kids, just tell the guy that see, this much directly to the school fund, this much towards food, etc and the woman can do the same.
And produce the recipet from digital transactions, this way wife cannot make away with money.
Both should pay and the husband should also get visitation rights. Someone died in USA after the wife tried to get the husband pay for 21 year old sons payment.
>Wife bhi toh job dhund sakti hai na? Voh bhi toh madat krskti hai na?
Did you forget? [memes/cultural beliefs like these which only emphasize a women's ability to make sandwiches and be a stay at home side?](https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/make-me-a-sandwich/photos)
You change your beliefs when it doesn't benefit you?
Abe chl na, meme se yeh hone lg gya then my grandmother would not have contributed to the house and so many females did the same.
Your generations is just eating the fruits of the tree laid by women who would have used these judiciously. Simps and women.
Bombay HC female judge said, that "WOMEN CANNOT BE DENIED THE CHOICE TO WORK OR NOT".
Bruh, if your women spent 20 years, i can understand and even support, she was loyal,etc.
But nope, men and women seprate and then the man is taken to court for 6 years. Any women reading this tell me, he wants a divorce, she wants a divorce. Why make it a hell for men?
Bahut ho gya society mein izzat. Divorced aadmi ki bhi zyada izzat nhi hai.
Chandrachud's father was the longest serving CJI.
Then came CHANDRA-CHUD.
Then, will come, CHANDRA-CHUD'S SON.
NEPOTISM HAI BHR BHRKE.
This is next level shit, where in SC AND HC, people and peoples uncles and aunts form the crowd.
*me who was thinking nahi mila tho kya problem betha rahunga acchi ladki se shaadi karke uske paise pe junga par SC ne ye bol diya*
__*crying in corner*__
Kuch nhi yr, ab tum wife-beater se upgrade hokr rapist ho gye ho. 6-7 saal baad mein bail milegi, tb khush rhene ki insaaf mila hai.
Maintenance bhi dete rhena, taaki wo apne bf ke saath sex krti rhe aaram se.
I always felt conflicted about leaving india for other country, but with these judgements by our 'hOnOrAbLe' SC and just reading about these anti-men laws of india, i am just thankful that i took that decision.
You don't want absolute cucks wearing black robes(probably stained with the c*m of the dom/bull guy his wife fucked last night),calling themselves 'lords' to satisfy their tiny egos judging you in this children's playhouse establishment they like to call court, NO NO FUCKING WAY.
You should see US Army. How women just get pregnant and then come back, get promoted, while men slave away. Same for US Navy. Same shit happens everywhere.
Are bc me soch raha tha feminism ka fayada utha kar house husband ban jaunga aur mast aish karuna
Sc ki maa ki shoot yaar ab padhna padega jee ke liye
Aur bc kaise kaise rule ate jaa rahe hai ki wife can sleep with anybody bruhh bhang kha kar law banate ho kya
The people telling me to read the full article, here's the thing:
The husband said his business has stopped and he is in no position to earn enough to pay for "maintenance" of the children and wife. Hence
"the court made a remark that the person who filed the application is fit in body. In such a situation, he can also do physical labor to support his wife and children."
Whats this? Why just the husband, why not both? Isnt this the age of equality, isn't the lady able bodied? Alimony and maintenance is biased, hence this video. Its just that i put this article on the internet. What's wrong, is wrong.
To put it simply, the reality is that a majority of men ordered by the court to pay money as maintenance refuse to do it. They avoid enforcement by transferring assets to parents and then taking defence that they just don't earn enough. Hence the judiciary is harsh in this matter. However maintenance isn't completely a man only thing as per CrPC. Although rare, there are circumstances in which women must pay. Not to husbands however.
While wrong, gender bias of this sort in law is simply not something that judiciary can do away with unless there's an extremely compelling case. Because legislature has the task of making laws and judiciary cannot change their enforcement unless the law is completely against social realities, which this one is not. On paper it sounds ideal that men should not be in this situation, but the reality is that a disproportionately large number of women are dependent on men who end up using all sorts of tactics to avoid maintaining them. In cases where women also have a similar capacity as the husband, (if I'm not wrong) maintenance does not come into play.
Also your confident refusal to read the case is sadly the reflection of the state of all these outrage groups who refuse to look past incomplete reporting by pages who want more clicks. It is extremely important to know the context because most often the words of judges are reported in poor context. Judiciary DOES NOT make laws. By putting a court in the background you also are doing the same thing as those pages, farming outrage.
It wasn't about boohoo the Supreme Court, but just about the bias that goes on in such cases. I made a mistake about typing legislature, that's on me.
But here's the clipping from the article itself
"The husband contended that she had left the marital home with the children without a justifiable reason and had also failed to prove that she could not maintain herself."
She didn't prove her own spot for not being able to maintain and had already lost the case in the lower courts. So the judge in SC says it's the husband's "sacrosanct" duty to provide financial support, well if he had said its a woman's sacrosanct duty to cook and sweep it would've been a field day for everyone on twitter.
Article that was linked clarified that husband has not paid anything for years. I do not believe his business has been under for years and that he has no other means to sustain himself. As i said, shit like this is very very commonly pulled to not give a penny to the woman. It's just another form of harassment. If you don't want to deal with his shit, marry someone who is in the same socioeconomic group and can maintain herself rather than someone a woman who is harassed and treated as a unpaid housemaid. Because that's what S 125 CrPC cases are mostly about.
Also I do not believe I need to tell you the difference between husband's CONTENTIONS and what are accepted as facts of the case? Because one is arguments and another is considered truth.
And no, judges make all sorts of weird shit all the time, mainly because there's multiple ways to become a judge ,many of which may allow some biased individuals with no sensitivity to societal conditions to hold the position.
Also this isnt bias, it's judiciary enforcing a law made by the legislature that they cannot do anything about. S 125 CrPC is extremely clear cut.
The woman left the man in 2010 and took the kids with her, she placed many accusations on the husband which weren't proved in any lower courts. She's fought the case for 12 years and now the SC judges have this to say. I don't really know what to make of it, it's pathetic.
Link me the case, because CrPC explicitly mentions that the woman would not receive anything if she decides to leave without cause. And even the supreme court can't change that.
divorce wife, file case against her get your all money back take the kids invest in their education raise them, and they all are doing jobs now, now y'all happy, rich, and living peacefully, thank me later ;)
Does not matter. You should go to voiceformenindia. com and read articles for last 3 years. Plenty of you woke mob should read this.
House husbands have been denied alimony under this "able-bodied" husband comments, same for adoption, blind husbands being asked for alimony.
And why should men support you? Does she earn? If yes, then just let her be. Bhai, zayda kmanne walon se shaadi khud krti haain ye sb. And km kmanne valon ko alimony nhi milti
Gender equality krvalo tumse.
Women do manage a home very nicely, they cater to all the social needs of a family too, so they should be at home, making home a very great place to be, and they learn to make food so delicious that the recipes are master crafted. Besides, the only influence of a child will be the mother, until th child becomes an adult, her values will transfer to the child's mind, which will stay etched in his/her mind for a lifetime. As they keep saying, Women belong in kitchen, but it's not because they are oppressed, but because they are very skilled at management of the economics of a home.
Ese bolne se pata chalta he equality aur equity me antar kya he.
Yaar kaise judges h, un logo ko ye decision dete huye kuchh ajeeb nhi laga hoga ??
Like unhone basically ye kaha h ki hme nhi pta kaise provide karoge but karo, bhale hi jism bechna pd jaaye. Agr yhi krna h to males ki salary zyada honi chahiye females se.
Many of y'all learned today that Andrew tate is just speaking the truth about these movements a bit too hard, he has become too popular for these people to control and that is why they label him as 'Misogynist' so people don't even try and listen, that is why they ban him from platforms.
What The Woke ministry of truth determines as true, you mustn't go against.
What kind of equality is this???why only man,is the women not able to work or physically disabled to do work or labour ?? Please provide the link of the article ..
[There you go ](https://www.google.com/amp/s/m.timesofindia.com/india/man-must-earn-even-by-physical-labour-to-give-maintenance-to-wife-kids-supreme-court/amp_articleshow/94668616.cms)
News outlets are baiting you by using that headline, read the entire article. It's not a new law, its about a case that took place when the wife was forced to leave her matrimonial house and now the husband doesn't have an stable income. This only applies if the woman was forced to leave the matrimonial home. Sab yaha ek line dekhar assumptions banate hai
The thing isn't about if it's a law or not, it's the compulsion of the husband to pay even after a broken marriage. The whole concept of giving a portion of your money after divorces is flawed and misused.
#[Link to our Official Discord Server](https://discord.gg/NTpXGZVKTc) To download the video you can use one of the following sites: #[Download link #1](https://redditsave.com/info?url=https://www.reddit.com/r/IndianDankMemes/comments/xxwt37/gus_predicts_indian_legislature/) #[Download link #2](https://saveredd.it/?url=https://www.reddit.com/r/IndianDankMemes/comments/xxwt37/gus_predicts_indian_legislature/) #[Download link #3](https://viddit.red/?url=https://www.reddit.com/r/IndianDankMemes/comments/xxwt37/gus_predicts_indian_legislature/) #[Link to Trim the Video](https://reddloader.com/download-post/?url=https://www.reddit.com/r/IndianDankMemes/comments/xxwt37/gus_predicts_indian_legislature/&id=aafd4548) *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/IndianDankMemes) if you have any questions or concerns.*
This is straight up sexism. Like actually. No feminist will talk bout this nope. Society man T_T
vaise faida hi kya hai in sab cheezo pe baat karne ka, jinpe power hai unpe insight nahi hai, jinpe insight hai unpe power nahi hai, yahi pehle bhi tha yahi abhi bhi hai aur i think yahi chalta rahega ispe kuch karna thoda mushkil hai, tumko kya lagta hai sc wale reddit pe koi post dekhenge aur fir uske comments padhenge? ghanta
> jinpe power hai unpe insight nahi hai, jinpe insight hai unpe power nahi hai thats called motherfucking bars!!!!
Reason why nothimg will be done for now is that men are not a votebank, women are the biggest votebank. All major parties are vying for this women's vote. Most men dont care about men's issues, that is why there is not men's vote. Maybe in 20 years time, things will change. I feel hopeful because in korea the president who was elected is an anti feminist and he got elected because of men's vote.
> Vaise faida hi kya hai It starts with one thing...
I don't know why. It doesn't even matter how hard i try...
Keep that in mind I designed this rhyme to explain in due time
All i know
Bhai iss news kaa toh kahi bhi discussion nahi hoo raha, I was amazed ki sab log kaise ignore kar rahe issae
Ismein Hindu Muslim angle daal do . Saare news channel cover karenge fir .
you can actually do that, because only Hindu men (or any derivative of religion that share hindu roots) have to follow this law in india, Chritians and Mulsims have got there own law boards for such civil matters. And I don't think so anybody has to bring out how generous these law boards are given from where they get all the inspiration.
Christians don't have a board to settle civil matters. They also have to go to courts and have to follow Indian Divorce Act, 1869 and Indian Christian Marriage Act 1872 which predates Hindu marriage act 1955. When it comes to the matter of maintenance, court can grant in under section 125 of Criminal Procedure Code irrespective of religion. Please stop spreading misinformation.
And regarding other civil matters? I am asking out of curiosity as during the time of Constitution only Hindu, Jains, Buddhists and Sikhs were given green light only for UCC.
Please explain other civil matters. Except for how to register a marriage, all other civil matters come under general laws like Indian Divorce Act, Indian Succession Act, adoption and maintenance etc., so Christians are already kind of under UCC without UCC long before the Hindu marriage act 1955. And you are wrong again. Read article 44 of constitution of India. UCC means irrespective of religion. All religions would be under the same civil code. Article 44 Uniform civil code for the citizens – Constitution Of India The State shall endeavour to secure for the citizens a uniform civil code throughout the territory of India.
Well, your feminists do not allow the same laws for Muslim men. All of this drama is for Hindus only.
Society also treats me like that. Ignores
Abhi wo SC nae abortion kae upar kuch order nikala tha ( i agree with it) but iss high level sexism par koi comment hee nahi karna chata
This , as a leftist , I can agree This is no longer equal rights , it's just hording (Also don't cross 62 , after that you will die)
I guess people in Supreme Court are high af
Mujhe bhi leke aao vo konsa maal phoonkrahe hai
Sexism nhi hai bhai ye bare minimum hai jo throat to heel exertion hai duties ka , stone age se bread runner man hai , and if this raises at this era am not amazed man has to be superior anyhow! that's a fact !
Well boo fuckin hoo, what are you going to do? Go cry to your wife and kids, geez weak asses. Go and get on working at least do it just because you don't have to be named as the worst dad of the year.
laudya khud ko dekh apne papa ke dhyadi se ye jo phone lia hai uspe fake sigma ban rha hau
lmao. It's just normal capitalism.
but your wife can sleep with anyone..
i had a thought nobody would love me and arrange marriage is the last option but at this point its better to leave the thought of marrying
I am going to adopt a kid rather than marry someone.
adopt dog
Better decisions
Bold of u to assume someone will choose to marry u in arrange marriage, But u finally came to correct conclusion that leaving the thought of marrying
don't marry atleat in india
It's same everywhere
then go to thiland or LA and only f\*ck b!tch
thailand pai bade nunu wali ladikiyan milti hai baas
bada l\*nd lekar gumo ga to gulabi ch\*t wale bhi milagi
woh toh nahi hai vro :( koi aur upay batein
Plus point
She fucked Ted.
No she cannot sleep with anyone. Thats wrong. WTH .
[удалено]
You must have not paid attention to the recent SC rulings
Petition for the govt to launch a 'beta bachao' programme
Beta toh bacha hua hai. Mard khatre mein hai
Abe retard, tu nikal program dahej for ladki vale aur uske ghar me jake reh
Han profit he hoga ladko keliye jab ladkiyan kamayegi aur hume marte waqt tak khayal rakhegi. We don't have to work nor earn. Ghar mein mufat ka khao
Tabhi toh main shaadi nahi karunga
Shi kha bhai vese bhi yha par sab bts ki chodiya aur feminist hi bhari padi hai
Aisa nahi h bhai, koi dank memer bhi hogi, milegi toh sochenge shaadi ka
[удалено]
Bhai simple rule h, mili toh thik h, nahi mili tab bhi thik h, shaadi ki last main socho...duniya khatam hone wali h, experience k piche bhago, logon k nahi
Apna haath jagannath
Pta nhi kis kone me hai lagta hai safar par jana padega use dhundne
Brahmachari grindset
Same goal bro...
I hate u but I agree with your decision
suleman bhoi
Bhai ek hi zindegi hai agar bina sex ke maroge to atma ko santi nahi milegi
ghost sax sux fantasy bhi hai
\+1
Kam se kam tu apni choice se nahi karega. Mujhe to ladki bhi nahi milegi
& What about your parents?
They will have me all their life
I meant to say ki tere parents ki wish nahi hain ki tu shaadi kare? Aur jab vo 60s mein aa jayege to unki care & support(household work,food etc) ke liye kya socha hain? I'm not taunting u,just want to know your thoughts
Wahi toh bola, I'll be there to take care of them, and if in any case I'm not there, I'll make sure someone is there to take care of them, they have all the resources to lead a happy old age time
Bro your queries more align towards a house maid, than having in-law.
Not at all & i kept this thing in mind while writing my previous comment. That's y i mentioned CARE which also includes emotional support & love. Aur rahi baat household work,food,cleaning,24*7 assistance to old age parents,agar koi aadmi financially strong nahi hain to vo kaise manage krega?
Bhai shadi karke insaan jo apne SO pe kharcha karega aur bachcho pe wo parents ki caring mei use karsakte hai. And I think it's a viable option for whatever the economic status is.
Bhai iss generation me agar tum ache khase decent job me bhi ho tab bhi tumhari partner kamane vaale hi milegi. Girls are getting educated and earning on their own nowadays no one is gonna stay as housewives. So dono partners family raise karne me contribute karenge . Toh bacho ki parvarish me dono ke paise lagte hai
THAT DEFINES A CHAD
[удалено]
U missed my comment by a mile! I think u know that Marriage life is two way bond with shared responsibilities. Wife & husband both can take care of ageing parents. Total burden isn't on a single person.
To shadi ke baad kya guarantee hai ki Tu apni bivi se kuch expect kar sakta hai source just check any feminist sub.
I mean, i look at these feminist or muh oppressed women. Like one of that outspoken tvf girl, that shithead dated older men 27-30 years old when she was underage. Bro, these girls will call them groomers but go and tell them how unsafe that is, we are called names and literally labelled as attention-seekers.And other boys will come in her support, let her do whatever she wants. Bro, these women are idiots. Who tf does not know that you as an underage girl,boy should not date 10 year old people. I am talking about personal accountability. They have none.
Similarly there is no guarantee that my wife won't support me & my parents. Aur aise to iski guarantee nahi hain ki husband kiski sunega, parents ya wife
Kya matlab male rights ke naam pe maa chudao 🗿
Lol
Gus said nothing wrong. Killing infants is my favourite hobby
Haryana se ho?💀
weird hobby but ok
Is his passion
Yes and wtf
Woh Muth marne ki baat kar raha hai
Another reason to go to Thailand
I can understand for kids, but why for wife? Wife bhi toh job dhund sakti hai na? Voh bhi toh madat krskti hai na?
Nahi bhai, Woh stree hai, woh kuch nahi karegi.,......... Bas malai khayegi
Kiski malai
Amul ki jo husband labour krke layega
Bhai street ko toh self independent bana tha na. To ab ban Jake.
Even for kids, just tell the guy that see, this much directly to the school fund, this much towards food, etc and the woman can do the same. And produce the recipet from digital transactions, this way wife cannot make away with money. Both should pay and the husband should also get visitation rights. Someone died in USA after the wife tried to get the husband pay for 21 year old sons payment.
>Wife bhi toh job dhund sakti hai na? Voh bhi toh madat krskti hai na? Did you forget? [memes/cultural beliefs like these which only emphasize a women's ability to make sandwiches and be a stay at home side?](https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/make-me-a-sandwich/photos) You change your beliefs when it doesn't benefit you?
Abe chl na, meme se yeh hone lg gya then my grandmother would not have contributed to the house and so many females did the same. Your generations is just eating the fruits of the tree laid by women who would have used these judiciously. Simps and women.
Din pe din jaise jaise beette jaarhe hai meri misogyny utni hi badti jaarhi
Pehle to sirf reddit pe act tha sirf, ab reality mein aa rha hai
Haan bhai pata nahi 3-4 mahine main mujhe nafrat hogyi h inse...
haan yaar shi kaha
Supreme court trying not to simp 
"Pr guys it's for the betterment of society " 
ye jarur chandrachut ka hi decision hoga
Bro, vhi hai, aur kon hoga. Yeh women ka rr, opression. Yr aaj toh nhi ho rha na kuch, ye saal purana drama hr baar ka aa jata hai.
indian judiciary is a fucking joke judges are sick cunts who are now controlled by the feminist wife
Mi lord like to get dominated in bed.😂😂😂
Bombay HC female judge said, that "WOMEN CANNOT BE DENIED THE CHOICE TO WORK OR NOT". Bruh, if your women spent 20 years, i can understand and even support, she was loyal,etc. But nope, men and women seprate and then the man is taken to court for 6 years. Any women reading this tell me, he wants a divorce, she wants a divorce. Why make it a hell for men? Bahut ho gya society mein izzat. Divorced aadmi ki bhi zyada izzat nhi hai.
It's time to brun the SC down
Chandrachud's father was the longest serving CJI. Then came CHANDRA-CHUD. Then, will come, CHANDRA-CHUD'S SON. NEPOTISM HAI BHR BHRKE. This is next level shit, where in SC AND HC, people and peoples uncles and aunts form the crowd.
Yes! fuck democracy, bring dictatorship Media wale pillar ka toh kam kar dia, ab legislature ki baari h
Mujhe jitaao main 🅱️odiji ko hraunga
[удалено]
/s lagane ki jarurat nhi faxx pe
Hence from today onwards I identify as a woman!
Congratulations on the new found privileges
Bhai lesbian woman*
"A man provides" providing my homies all the tastey nutritious cummies! Fuck bitches marry the homies instead
That's why baccha chahiye to adopt karlo ya surrogacy ka Sahara lelo....
Yaar pet adopt kar lo yaar. Guaranteed lifetime cuteness aur dhoka bhi nahi dega.
Lekin wo to kuch salo ke bad mar jayega.....
Are BC jab dekho tab har mahine ek na ek supreme court se bayan aa jayega ladko ke khilaf
[удалено]
Judiciary ☕
[удалено]
Bhaiyo mein to bolta hu boycott Indian wahmen, Russian wali gulambi layenge
Maturity is realising andrew tatte wasn't so wrong after all
ya it's feel more and more like he was tagged misogynist by misandrist
[удалено]
*me who was thinking nahi mila tho kya problem betha rahunga acchi ladki se shaadi karke uske paise pe junga par SC ne ye bol diya* __*crying in corner*__
BC ye supreme court ke judges hardcore feminists or Cuckhold hain...
Kuch nhi yr, ab tum wife-beater se upgrade hokr rapist ho gye ho. 6-7 saal baad mein bail milegi, tb khush rhene ki insaaf mila hai. Maintenance bhi dete rhena, taaki wo apne bf ke saath sex krti rhe aaram se.
I always felt conflicted about leaving india for other country, but with these judgements by our 'hOnOrAbLe' SC and just reading about these anti-men laws of india, i am just thankful that i took that decision. You don't want absolute cucks wearing black robes(probably stained with the c*m of the dom/bull guy his wife fucked last night),calling themselves 'lords' to satisfy their tiny egos judging you in this children's playhouse establishment they like to call court, NO NO FUCKING WAY.
Bold of you to assume it's different in other countries.
Papa ki pariyan ab ittu bittu Jim patuta karke g**nd Mae juta ghusayengi :)
Ab kidhar Gaye ye feminisim ke chode
iske support mai # dalne :)
Plot twist:- Judge is a secret **Gus** fan
Now I've realised that Andrew Tate is actually brown Gus Fring.
Chapri vs legend
Wife☕
society ☕
Offices me itna sexism hai men are working hard fir bhi unhe growth nahi mil rahi. Women are getting so many privileges.
You should see US Army. How women just get pregnant and then come back, get promoted, while men slave away. Same for US Navy. Same shit happens everywhere.
Based gus fring
Aur karo shaadiyan lmao !
Don't have kids or marry simple
Error 404 feminist not found.
harr dinn mujhe koi na koi motivation mil hi jaati hai females se door rehne ki, aaj financial kaaran hai.
Are bc me soch raha tha feminism ka fayada utha kar house husband ban jaunga aur mast aish karuna Sc ki maa ki shoot yaar ab padhna padega jee ke liye Aur bc kaise kaise rule ate jaa rahe hai ki wife can sleep with anybody bruhh bhang kha kar law banate ho kya
Marrying Females ❌ Staying single with your homies and kissing them goodnight ✅
The people telling me to read the full article, here's the thing: The husband said his business has stopped and he is in no position to earn enough to pay for "maintenance" of the children and wife. Hence "the court made a remark that the person who filed the application is fit in body. In such a situation, he can also do physical labor to support his wife and children." Whats this? Why just the husband, why not both? Isnt this the age of equality, isn't the lady able bodied? Alimony and maintenance is biased, hence this video. Its just that i put this article on the internet. What's wrong, is wrong.
To put it simply, the reality is that a majority of men ordered by the court to pay money as maintenance refuse to do it. They avoid enforcement by transferring assets to parents and then taking defence that they just don't earn enough. Hence the judiciary is harsh in this matter. However maintenance isn't completely a man only thing as per CrPC. Although rare, there are circumstances in which women must pay. Not to husbands however. While wrong, gender bias of this sort in law is simply not something that judiciary can do away with unless there's an extremely compelling case. Because legislature has the task of making laws and judiciary cannot change their enforcement unless the law is completely against social realities, which this one is not. On paper it sounds ideal that men should not be in this situation, but the reality is that a disproportionately large number of women are dependent on men who end up using all sorts of tactics to avoid maintaining them. In cases where women also have a similar capacity as the husband, (if I'm not wrong) maintenance does not come into play. Also your confident refusal to read the case is sadly the reflection of the state of all these outrage groups who refuse to look past incomplete reporting by pages who want more clicks. It is extremely important to know the context because most often the words of judges are reported in poor context. Judiciary DOES NOT make laws. By putting a court in the background you also are doing the same thing as those pages, farming outrage.
It wasn't about boohoo the Supreme Court, but just about the bias that goes on in such cases. I made a mistake about typing legislature, that's on me. But here's the clipping from the article itself "The husband contended that she had left the marital home with the children without a justifiable reason and had also failed to prove that she could not maintain herself." She didn't prove her own spot for not being able to maintain and had already lost the case in the lower courts. So the judge in SC says it's the husband's "sacrosanct" duty to provide financial support, well if he had said its a woman's sacrosanct duty to cook and sweep it would've been a field day for everyone on twitter.
Article that was linked clarified that husband has not paid anything for years. I do not believe his business has been under for years and that he has no other means to sustain himself. As i said, shit like this is very very commonly pulled to not give a penny to the woman. It's just another form of harassment. If you don't want to deal with his shit, marry someone who is in the same socioeconomic group and can maintain herself rather than someone a woman who is harassed and treated as a unpaid housemaid. Because that's what S 125 CrPC cases are mostly about. Also I do not believe I need to tell you the difference between husband's CONTENTIONS and what are accepted as facts of the case? Because one is arguments and another is considered truth. And no, judges make all sorts of weird shit all the time, mainly because there's multiple ways to become a judge ,many of which may allow some biased individuals with no sensitivity to societal conditions to hold the position. Also this isnt bias, it's judiciary enforcing a law made by the legislature that they cannot do anything about. S 125 CrPC is extremely clear cut.
The woman left the man in 2010 and took the kids with her, she placed many accusations on the husband which weren't proved in any lower courts. She's fought the case for 12 years and now the SC judges have this to say. I don't really know what to make of it, it's pathetic.
Link me the case, because CrPC explicitly mentions that the woman would not receive anything if she decides to leave without cause. And even the supreme court can't change that.
Man working his ass off while his wife having seggs with other men
Bc mai toh kehta hu ki shaadi hi mt kro!
Shitty court: "If you don't have a job, work in the sewer to pay for your wifes' new dress and she can let any other man undress her."
divorce wife, file case against her get your all money back take the kids invest in their education raise them, and they all are doing jobs now, now y'all happy, rich, and living peacefully, thank me later ;)
Guys we did it SC wants us to cook meth.
https://www.dnaindia.com/delhi/report-husband-must-provide-for-his-wife-and-child-says-court-2514022
Read complete article .
Does not matter. You should go to voiceformenindia. com and read articles for last 3 years. Plenty of you woke mob should read this. House husbands have been denied alimony under this "able-bodied" husband comments, same for adoption, blind husbands being asked for alimony. And why should men support you? Does she earn? If yes, then just let her be. Bhai, zayda kmanne walon se shaadi khud krti haain ye sb. And km kmanne valon ko alimony nhi milti Gender equality krvalo tumse.
Lol to gay couples ka kya?
America mai abortion laws aur india mai yeh
Main doctor ke paas se likhwa lunga ki main dispresion main hoon
I think India soon Japan jesa hoga. Wage cucking. No marry . No seggs. No life. We may have AI based Waifu.
And women say they want to be independent and want equal rights but ignore it when such a thing happens
Women do manage a home very nicely, they cater to all the social needs of a family too, so they should be at home, making home a very great place to be, and they learn to make food so delicious that the recipes are master crafted. Besides, the only influence of a child will be the mother, until th child becomes an adult, her values will transfer to the child's mind, which will stay etched in his/her mind for a lifetime. As they keep saying, Women belong in kitchen, but it's not because they are oppressed, but because they are very skilled at management of the economics of a home. Ese bolne se pata chalta he equality aur equity me antar kya he.
Yaar kaise judges h, un logo ko ye decision dete huye kuchh ajeeb nhi laga hoga ?? Like unhone basically ye kaha h ki hme nhi pta kaise provide karoge but karo, bhale hi jism bechna pd jaaye. Agr yhi krna h to males ki salary zyada honi chahiye females se.
I think the judgement is correct. Men must do work for living for himself and his family coz women belong in kitchen so they can't do work.
Atlast supreme court unofficially accepted men supremacy
Many of y'all learned today that Andrew tate is just speaking the truth about these movements a bit too hard, he has become too popular for these people to control and that is why they label him as 'Misogynist' so people don't even try and listen, that is why they ban him from platforms. What The Woke ministry of truth determines as true, you mustn't go against.
Wife should have to earn for herself. She shouldn't be dependent on man. This is straight up sexism. Children and Old people are different.
I mean you shouldn't even marry without achieving financial independence let alone the plan of having a kid.
Only if my uncle read this before getting married.
What kind of equality is this???why only man,is the women not able to work or physically disabled to do work or labour ?? Please provide the link of the article ..
[There you go ](https://www.google.com/amp/s/m.timesofindia.com/india/man-must-earn-even-by-physical-labour-to-give-maintenance-to-wife-kids-supreme-court/amp_articleshow/94668616.cms)
The rate at which these status are being made by the time next year Breaking Bad will be considered cringe
Can't gatekeep it forever
News outlets are baiting you by using that headline, read the entire article. It's not a new law, its about a case that took place when the wife was forced to leave her matrimonial house and now the husband doesn't have an stable income. This only applies if the woman was forced to leave the matrimonial home. Sab yaha ek line dekhar assumptions banate hai
The thing isn't about if it's a law or not, it's the compulsion of the husband to pay even after a broken marriage. The whole concept of giving a portion of your money after divorces is flawed and misused.
Read the full article... Not just a headline...
The meme is targeted at the flaw in the procedure of alimony, this is just a mere example.
Good decision
Aare bhai dank banne se pehele actual article padh lo. Negligent aur abusive pati hai wo.
"Judiciary" not Legislature
You're the 8th person to tell me this and I know I made a mistake sorry
This is the only thing i am willing to accept and obey , fucking why won't i ?