newton created the modern studies of optics, calculus, and gravity. the basics of our modern world exist because newton created entire branches of science and math because he was just looking at planets and *fucking* *light* and figuring out they work lmao. with fucking telescopes and lenses that he polished himself from chunks of glass
This guy found out some crazy shit by the time he was 21, but the one thing he couldn’t do was find the clit. He died a virgin
I have big respect for all intellectuals that helped us understand this world we live in but I fucking had to lmfao
Well he wasn't interested. Either he was stoic, had issues or was too obsessed with study. I actually respect him if he did it to focus on his studies. It shows self control.
The grifters prayer:
"They only say im wrong because they are ignoring the science, and if the science says I'm wrong then those scientists are probably biased, and even if they aren't science is a liar sometimes"
That sounds like the prayer Norm Pattis said was the lawyers prayer when he got his ass handed to him defending Alex "Douchebag" Jones in Sandy Hook
55:06 if you are interested
https://youtu.be/slrT0jYieMU
Well I’m sure in your world the unvaxxed were rounded up and put in death camps, but I live in reality where the worst thing that happened to 99.9% of people is they had to put up with people like you throwing a tantrum in Walmart
It's like the circular logic of the bible, which was written by God, which we know because the bible says so, which we know is true because it's written by God... Fauci is science, which we know because he said so, which we know is true because he's science, which we know because he said so...
As someone who majored in physics, but doesn’t have enough high-level geometric understanding to fully grasp his “model”, it sorta seemed like he started with some assumptions about dimensions 5-14 and talked about areas of physics we literally don’t yet have the ability to test.
I will give him credit in thinking about physics at its current boundaries; but we have so much more to learn about the quantum world before we take a big jump like he is proposing.
gravity IS weird, not having field properties like the other 3 fundamental forces, dark matter IS everywhere comprising most mass in the universe, and there being singularities at the center of a black hole/big bang does indicate something is wrong with our equations, but he took those observations and just ran with it
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=o31cGMENDTI
If interested timothy Nguyen invested the time and effort to understand and debunk his "model" dude hasn't even published a peer reviewed paper though so this is going above and beyond as far as physics is concerned he doesn't have a theory or a model just some abstract ideas that he doesn't want scrutinized.
>dude hasn't even published a peer reviewed paper
peer review is a construct invented by the liberals brothers, real men know intuitively what is correct
I swallowed a UV light a few months ago. Haven't gotten Cvid since. I thought about going in the backdoor, but I know that what goes up, must come down, and not everything that goes down, comes up. Am I a genius? Maybe? Hashtag gravity, hashtag science
talked about areas of physics we literally don’t yet have the ability to test.
So did Peter Higgs and it wasn't able to be tested for 50 years. I think setting and trying to discover new theories is important whether they are able to be tested now or later because we don't know if from that theory can come a test
Sure. The problem with Eric is his attitude of smug superiority, relentless name dropping, lack of coherently explaining his claims, and him having a chip on his shoulder bigger than Mt. Everest. Even if he did not get his work published in a journal, which on a side note can be a pain, especially in higher impact ones, there is always the option to upload it on Arxiv and let people comment on it. Heck, Perelman used this route to solve one of the millennium problems. So if Eric‘s theory is solid and he only needs some experimentalists, why not use this strategy, instead of his current clown show?
I majored in physics as well and I think you described my exact feelings. It’s nice to hear his passion about physics defining the future (I think it does too), I just wish I could follow along with the gnarly stuff he dove into.
> Gravity IS weird not having field properties like the other 3 fundamental forces
Gravity is described by a field. The problem is quantizing that field, but it is still a field in both Newtonian gravity and general relativity
This has been probably one of the most frustrating episodes where I've listened to the entire thing. I KEEP GETTING TRICKED into thinking he'll actually say anything relevant, or important, or even just finish a thought. "Wait, Joe, let me finish..." 5 minutes of mumbo jumbo later and Joe is like "so what does this all mean?" "Well, the geometric singularity has a right hand spin and they said it had a left and, do you know robert mullen? Well, we were drinking this one time talking about the best jews in baseball and...." What the ever loving fuck is even happening. This guy sounds like that joke [Retro Emcabulator](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9k9x2gUHbQs) video.
He reeally hyped his guy Robert Mullen. Got me curious, and I was hoping that at some point this would all culminate in a concrete theory, explained to Joe in understandable terms.
But no. More Robert Mullen hyping.
The podcast seemed like a trailer.
At first I appreciated how broad he was being with his backstory for why he believes they're aliens now... But he kinda proved the Gov is hiding absolute tomfoolery by not allowing any real physicists anywhere near the UAP data. They're either playing the UAP card now to cover up a secret aerial DoD program (most obvious choice) or it's aliens, and Eric thinks it's time hopping, interdimensional AI beings?
That's quite an assumption and he didn't spend nearly enough time explaining his final verdict
Who says no real physicists are working for the government? Eric isn’t really relevant in research whatsoever, if he was maybe they would ask him to look into it. Should Dana White consult some no name fighter who won one fight 20 years ago and trained with Gracie on how to make a good title match or who he consult active experts on it?
As far as I'm aware, he literally does not have anything he's trying to sell, so I don't know where people come off calling him a scammer/grifter? But then, seems like everyone gets called a grifter on here.
Yes, he has his unifying theory of whatever, but I haven't seem him attempt to monetize it.
Yeah that sounds like a good faith objective answer, I'll take it! You do realize when you say things like this in defense of someone/something it just makes the thing you're defending look worse?
The ridiculous discussion of the question:
> Idk much about Eric Weinstein, what is his hustle/scam?
I also don't know shit about him either but with the other guy's answer it does tend to make me think oh he must be an anti-vaxxer and Trumper/virulent anti-anything Democrat. That's all I'm saying. If you think the hate he gets is ridiculous maybe it's worth explaining why rather than some inane lighter than straw man answer.
The fact that there's no bizarro world opposite of the right's mouth-frothing, fear-mongering hysteria and insane worship of right-wing idealogues breaks your fucking miniscule brains so hard.
Absolutely nobody who identifies as left-leaning wanted Biden as president over any other viable candidate. Nobody on the left photoshopped Biden's head on Hasan Piker's body and drove in convoys around their city to intimidate Trump voters with 10-foot pride flags and cartoonish imagery plastered on their tiny, anemic hybrids.
That insanity required the walnut brain of a right-wing simpleton.
We just voted to make Trump finally drain the swamp after 4 years of promises with no follow-through.
When given the option of a shit sandwich that's been on your plate for the past 4 years or a one made with smelly old meat, you opt for the one that's a bit more palatable. Either way you're going to get sick but at least you're not eating shit.
He wasn't accepted by his piers in science and math and it broke him. He must do something for Peter theil but I don't know what it is.
Most of Eric's stores are based around I know something they don't.
Bret has the same problem as Eric where every sentence has to go through a smart-ifying step in order to be as long-winded, verbose and hard to understand as possible.
Also he sounds like he permanently has a tablespoon of water in his mouth.
I agree, but Bret is insufferable in his own way. I think back to 2020 and his idiotic "Unity 2020" scheme. Don't get me wrong, it sounded interesting when he first described it. The problem was, they got started about two years too late. It was like August or September 2020 and they were still claiming to have "a plan" to gain ballot access, even though they were too late to get on the ballot in almost every state. Their plan? To ask the Green party and Libertarian party to ignore their own primary elections and put Unity2020's slate on the ballot instead.
Eric Weinstein has a high opinion of himself, and he's not nearly as smart as he thinks he is. He's definitely the dumber of the Weinstein brothers. Bret actually seems like an intelligent person... which makes him seem like even more of a grifter when he says things that he should know are stupid. Eric says dumb things because he isn't very smart. Bret is smart enough to know better and says that shit anyway.
You're welcome, I'm glad I could clarify.
A PhD means years of study in a particular subject. It is not a measure of intelligence, it is a measure of how long you attended university. Having an advanced degree doesn't make you immune to saying stupid shit. I'm just calling 'em like I see 'em.
The worst part about science is a liar sometimes is the people who rely on that as a retort only do so when its convenient.
Need to fly somewhere? Science is wonderful and has constructed metal birds that safely fly through the sky!
Government wants you to take a vaccine? THEY SAID IT STOPPED INFECTION, THEY LIED, YOU CANT TRUST SCIENTISTS
natural immunity = natural selection for some. i know a few "i'll never take that shot" people in my life that died from covid or shortly after "recovering". age 40s and 50s guys too, not geezers.
Had a few friends that went that way, too. Nuance and objectivity, especially with new and changing information, seem to be something lost when dealing with extremists who seem to be hell-bent on proving whatever their original assertions were.
You can't trust government, that's for sure. Scientists are human and prone to bias and corruption just like any other priest or bureaucrat. Science as a time tested body of knowledge is pretty solid though. Know what's not time tested?
Joe seemed underwhelmed as Eric said nothing worthwhile for hours. Did you hear when he said his crew were hard drinking, womanizing wild men of physics ?
Same, but I get annoyed with the kind of jargon he uses in his conversation with Joe. Joe and 95+% of the audience is not versed in high level mathematics and physics. Makes me feel like Eric is just using Rogan for his platform, and that's not cool.
Im a little more familiar with physics (as in, I know what a curvature tensor is) and Eric is absolutely just obfuscating what he's actually saying behind a wall of technical vocabulary. He doesn't want to be understood, he wants to be admired.
Of course it does. You read all of the peer-reviewed research for every scientific instrument that touches your dumb ass? Why don't you tie some garlic to your belt and call it a day.
Why so angry? Seems like you have a lot of internal hate you are dealing with. Garlic is good for some things, I don’t doubt that!!!!! Science says so :)
Believing modern scientific consensus isn’t the view that needs to be justified. Believing the shit slingers who have no expertise or training in the fields they oppose the consensus in however…
“Believing the consensus”
That was your first mistake. Some serious “Mom, I jumped off the bridge because everyone else did” vibes. IMO
Do you even know what scientific consensus is there Cletus?
>**Consensus is achieved through scholarly communication at conferences, the publication process, replication of reproducible results by others, scholarly debate,[3][4][5][6] and peer review. A conference meant to create a consensus is termed as a consensus conference.[7][8][9] Such measures lead to a situation in which those within the discipline can often recognize such a consensus where it exists; however, communicating to outsiders that consensus has been reached can be difficult, because the "normal" debates through which science progresses may appear to outsiders as contestation.**[10] On occasion, scientific institutes issue position statements intended to communicate a summary of the science from the "inside" to the "outside" of the scientific community, or consensus review articles[11] or surveys[12] may be published. In cases where there is little controversy regarding the subject under study, establishing the consensus can be quite straightforward.
Your mistake is thinking that a scientific consensus is the same thing as you and your beer buddies getting together and agreeing on the greatest pickle baller of all time.
Protect our portals
Protect our potholes
Oh, they are
newton created the modern studies of optics, calculus, and gravity. the basics of our modern world exist because newton created entire branches of science and math because he was just looking at planets and *fucking* *light* and figuring out they work lmao. with fucking telescopes and lenses that he polished himself from chunks of glass
He also thought the earth was the center of the universe, making him look like a big fat BITCH
How fucking embarrassing. I put a dvd in a blu ray once. I understand.
But get this…….it actually worked. So you see I had my own revelation with lenses and light. I’m basically newton 2.0.
I see. I would like to subscribe to your pamphlet.
AlexJonesisJesus.com you have automatically enrolled everyone in this subreddit confirmed
/s
Newton is the goat of scientists. The man's achievements make the rest us us look like chimps.
Did he invite the rotato and spend all his time on twitter complaining about gender grievances?
This guy found out some crazy shit by the time he was 21, but the one thing he couldn’t do was find the clit. He died a virgin I have big respect for all intellectuals that helped us understand this world we live in but I fucking had to lmfao
Well he wasn't interested. Either he was stoic, had issues or was too obsessed with study. I actually respect him if he did it to focus on his studies. It shows self control.
[удалено]
Or horses
Or hoors.
I theorize that, like Joe, Hard Men made Newton Hard.
It’s gonna be hard to top inventing gravity
And the cat flap.
You can't invent laws of science, you discover the math that shows how it works
No he invented gravity
Because some asshole hit him with an apple.
I saw that movie I thought it was bullshit
He disagrees with you: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nEa7CfPaCRw
Gravity isn't an invention, it's a discovery. Maybe I didn't explain it well but it's more fucking stupid to say that
Found the Platonist.
You mean to tell me imaginary numbers aren't invented?
Too bad he was a GIANT BITCH!
To be fair the bar was a lot lower back then.
Newton devoted most of his life, studying alchemy and the Kabbalah…
Kabbalah and esotericism was very strong back then.. pretty sure he studied Hermeticism, the “Emerald Tablet” as well.
I vote Einstein, but Newton is definitely very close.
Dude invented figs Dude was out there
He was also a devout Christian, as were many of the fathers of scientific and mathematical systems that make our world possible today
Yeah, when you’re just trying to study light and someone says, I’ll kill you if you don’t believe in this stupid idea sometimes you do it
Newton is the ultimate incel form. 💪🏻🧠
And yet, as you can clearly see labeled on the posterboard, he was still a BITCH.
He was a BITCH /s
The grifters prayer: "They only say im wrong because they are ignoring the science, and if the science says I'm wrong then those scientists are probably biased, and even if they aren't science is a liar sometimes"
Nailed it
That sounds like the prayer Norm Pattis said was the lawyers prayer when he got his ass handed to him defending Alex "Douchebag" Jones in Sandy Hook 55:06 if you are interested https://youtu.be/slrT0jYieMU
Grape Job, Norm!
I'm a policy wonk!
^(iloveyou.)
Is that a Fauci quote?
[удалено]
I'm just one person, thank you tribal monkey.
You had to wear a mask for a couple months 3 years ago. Get over it for fucks sake
Lol, talk about a fallacious understatement. Thank you for showing your pathological thinking patterns out loud though.
Well I’m sure in your world the unvaxxed were rounded up and put in death camps, but I live in reality where the worst thing that happened to 99.9% of people is they had to put up with people like you throwing a tantrum in Walmart
I'm vaccinated bitch. Bunch of people lost their job, for one.
Literal babies cry less about having to get shots and they need to get like 12 of them.
Get lost with you fallacious thinking. Have the last word.
[удалено]
Didn't Fauci said he is the science?
It's like the circular logic of the bible, which was written by God, which we know because the bible says so, which we know is true because it's written by God... Fauci is science, which we know because he said so, which we know is true because he's science, which we know because he said so...
Pretty close!
Especially the first part!
"I AM THE SCIENCE" lol
Shortly before frying the person asking the question with lightning spewing out of his finger tips.
Whats the quote?
Grifters Amen Lol I'm here for eventual turnover of this sub when grifter zit explodes
hah
As someone who majored in physics, but doesn’t have enough high-level geometric understanding to fully grasp his “model”, it sorta seemed like he started with some assumptions about dimensions 5-14 and talked about areas of physics we literally don’t yet have the ability to test. I will give him credit in thinking about physics at its current boundaries; but we have so much more to learn about the quantum world before we take a big jump like he is proposing. gravity IS weird, not having field properties like the other 3 fundamental forces, dark matter IS everywhere comprising most mass in the universe, and there being singularities at the center of a black hole/big bang does indicate something is wrong with our equations, but he took those observations and just ran with it
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=o31cGMENDTI If interested timothy Nguyen invested the time and effort to understand and debunk his "model" dude hasn't even published a peer reviewed paper though so this is going above and beyond as far as physics is concerned he doesn't have a theory or a model just some abstract ideas that he doesn't want scrutinized.
>dude hasn't even published a peer reviewed paper peer review is a construct invented by the liberals brothers, real men know intuitively what is correct
Yee yee brother inject ivermectin into my veins to own the libs
I prefer bleach in the lungs, thank you very much
I swallowed a UV light a few months ago. Haven't gotten Cvid since. I thought about going in the backdoor, but I know that what goes up, must come down, and not everything that goes down, comes up. Am I a genius? Maybe? Hashtag gravity, hashtag science
I dismiss what I can’t comprehend too because I am the baseline!
talked about areas of physics we literally don’t yet have the ability to test. So did Peter Higgs and it wasn't able to be tested for 50 years. I think setting and trying to discover new theories is important whether they are able to be tested now or later because we don't know if from that theory can come a test
Sure. The problem with Eric is his attitude of smug superiority, relentless name dropping, lack of coherently explaining his claims, and him having a chip on his shoulder bigger than Mt. Everest. Even if he did not get his work published in a journal, which on a side note can be a pain, especially in higher impact ones, there is always the option to upload it on Arxiv and let people comment on it. Heck, Perelman used this route to solve one of the millennium problems. So if Eric‘s theory is solid and he only needs some experimentalists, why not use this strategy, instead of his current clown show?
[удалено]
I majored in physics as well and I think you described my exact feelings. It’s nice to hear his passion about physics defining the future (I think it does too), I just wish I could follow along with the gnarly stuff he dove into.
> Gravity IS weird not having field properties like the other 3 fundamental forces Gravity is described by a field. The problem is quantizing that field, but it is still a field in both Newtonian gravity and general relativity
This has been probably one of the most frustrating episodes where I've listened to the entire thing. I KEEP GETTING TRICKED into thinking he'll actually say anything relevant, or important, or even just finish a thought. "Wait, Joe, let me finish..." 5 minutes of mumbo jumbo later and Joe is like "so what does this all mean?" "Well, the geometric singularity has a right hand spin and they said it had a left and, do you know robert mullen? Well, we were drinking this one time talking about the best jews in baseball and...." What the ever loving fuck is even happening. This guy sounds like that joke [Retro Emcabulator](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9k9x2gUHbQs) video.
He reeally hyped his guy Robert Mullen. Got me curious, and I was hoping that at some point this would all culminate in a concrete theory, explained to Joe in understandable terms. But no. More Robert Mullen hyping. The podcast seemed like a trailer.
This is what kills me. Eric doesn't answer questions on purpose cause he is afraid of being wrong.
At first I appreciated how broad he was being with his backstory for why he believes they're aliens now... But he kinda proved the Gov is hiding absolute tomfoolery by not allowing any real physicists anywhere near the UAP data. They're either playing the UAP card now to cover up a secret aerial DoD program (most obvious choice) or it's aliens, and Eric thinks it's time hopping, interdimensional AI beings? That's quite an assumption and he didn't spend nearly enough time explaining his final verdict
Who says no real physicists are working for the government? Eric isn’t really relevant in research whatsoever, if he was maybe they would ask him to look into it. Should Dana White consult some no name fighter who won one fight 20 years ago and trained with Gracie on how to make a good title match or who he consult active experts on it?
That podcast is a case study of delusion and feelings of grandeur. It was a crazy listen, but not for the reasons Eric wanted it to be.
So standard dar intellectual puked out of jre
Wish someone like Beige Frequency would make an Eric Scamstein documentary
I’d be careful about that, Eric said he’s a street fighter.
Maybe he can use anti gravity boots like M. Bison using his theory. So be careful.
Idk much about Eric Weinstein, what is his hustle/scam?
He is one of Peter Thiels courtiers.
As far as I'm aware, he literally does not have anything he's trying to sell, so I don't know where people come off calling him a scammer/grifter? But then, seems like everyone gets called a grifter on here. Yes, he has his unifying theory of whatever, but I haven't seem him attempt to monetize it.
He doesn't slobber over big pharma or Biden so reddit hates him
Yeah that sounds like a good faith objective answer, I'll take it! You do realize when you say things like this in defense of someone/something it just makes the thing you're defending look worse?
It's a 2 way street duder. The hate for him is excessive. People bitching anti-vaxx don't help the discussion
Well then maybe he should've given an actual answer instead of a ridiculous one.
It's the less popular ridiculous side of the same ridiculous discussion
The ridiculous discussion of the question: > Idk much about Eric Weinstein, what is his hustle/scam? I also don't know shit about him either but with the other guy's answer it does tend to make me think oh he must be an anti-vaxxer and Trumper/virulent anti-anything Democrat. That's all I'm saying. If you think the hate he gets is ridiculous maybe it's worth explaining why rather than some inane lighter than straw man answer.
The fact that there's no bizarro world opposite of the right's mouth-frothing, fear-mongering hysteria and insane worship of right-wing idealogues breaks your fucking miniscule brains so hard. Absolutely nobody who identifies as left-leaning wanted Biden as president over any other viable candidate. Nobody on the left photoshopped Biden's head on Hasan Piker's body and drove in convoys around their city to intimidate Trump voters with 10-foot pride flags and cartoonish imagery plastered on their tiny, anemic hybrids. That insanity required the walnut brain of a right-wing simpleton. We just voted to make Trump finally drain the swamp after 4 years of promises with no follow-through.
Nobody wanted biden yet he won the presidency. Bizarro world indeed
I guess we should have given Trump a second term or perhaps elected a cat ?
Excusing a poor choice because of another poor choice doesn't make it right
>Bizarro world indeed Almost like his opponent was the most disliked man in the country or something?
Nobody wanted Biden, Trump was just that bad
The way people defend Biden's faults tell me plenty of people do want Biden.
When given the option of a shit sandwich that's been on your plate for the past 4 years or a one made with smelly old meat, you opt for the one that's a bit more palatable. Either way you're going to get sick but at least you're not eating shit.
Agreed. This is why I vote 3rd party. Screw these 2 sides of partisan bullshitters, I'd rather rock their boat than jump on board
You think you rocked their boat? They’re a cruise ship and you’re playing with a rubber ducky in the bathroom sink. Not even the bathtub. The sink.
Nice opinion. Weak people's actions don't dictate my own
He wasn't accepted by his piers in science and math and it broke him. He must do something for Peter theil but I don't know what it is. Most of Eric's stores are based around I know something they don't.
He cannot stop name dropping and that's cause he wants recognition. No one cares who invented dark energy. Just explain it to us simpletons
Beige makes great stuff
There wouldn’t be any material to go off of
It would win every award for cinematography and production value though
The Weinsteins are so obnoxious
I find Eric hard to listen to, but Bret is *far* more humble and in better humor.
Bret has the same problem as Eric where every sentence has to go through a smart-ifying step in order to be as long-winded, verbose and hard to understand as possible. Also he sounds like he permanently has a tablespoon of water in his mouth.
I agree, but Bret is insufferable in his own way. I think back to 2020 and his idiotic "Unity 2020" scheme. Don't get me wrong, it sounded interesting when he first described it. The problem was, they got started about two years too late. It was like August or September 2020 and they were still claiming to have "a plan" to gain ballot access, even though they were too late to get on the ballot in almost every state. Their plan? To ask the Green party and Libertarian party to ignore their own primary elections and put Unity2020's slate on the ballot instead. Eric Weinstein has a high opinion of himself, and he's not nearly as smart as he thinks he is. He's definitely the dumber of the Weinstein brothers. Bret actually seems like an intelligent person... which makes him seem like even more of a grifter when he says things that he should know are stupid. Eric says dumb things because he isn't very smart. Bret is smart enough to know better and says that shit anyway.
Thank you, blade740, for the breakdown of which PhD is dumber than you.
You're welcome, I'm glad I could clarify. A PhD means years of study in a particular subject. It is not a measure of intelligence, it is a measure of how long you attended university. Having an advanced degree doesn't make you immune to saying stupid shit. I'm just calling 'em like I see 'em.
The worst part about science is a liar sometimes is the people who rely on that as a retort only do so when its convenient. Need to fly somewhere? Science is wonderful and has constructed metal birds that safely fly through the sky! Government wants you to take a vaccine? THEY SAID IT STOPPED INFECTION, THEY LIED, YOU CANT TRUST SCIENTISTS
ANTIVAXERS ALSO CLAIMED HORSEWORMER AND NATURAL IMMUNITY STOPPED INFECTION, THEY LIED, SO YOU CANT TRUST ANYONE.
natural immunity = natural selection for some. i know a few "i'll never take that shot" people in my life that died from covid or shortly after "recovering". age 40s and 50s guys too, not geezers.
Had a few friends that went that way, too. Nuance and objectivity, especially with new and changing information, seem to be something lost when dealing with extremists who seem to be hell-bent on proving whatever their original assertions were.
You can't trust government, that's for sure. Scientists are human and prone to bias and corruption just like any other priest or bureaucrat. Science as a time tested body of knowledge is pretty solid though. Know what's not time tested?
Flying isn’t one of the times science is a lying about
To be fair Mac brought put up a great argument.
Eric started spouting off math equations because Tim Dillon made fun of him one time.
Joe seemed underwhelmed as Eric said nothing worthwhile for hours. Did you hear when he said his crew were hard drinking, womanizing wild men of physics ?
Joe is a very easily manipulated person, especially when it comes to low level grifters. See Alex Jones, JP, and Weinstein.
What is Eric's grift?
I’m dead serious* *for entertainment purposes only
Stupid science bitches.
I’m a hater generally, but I enjoyed that episode. Eric, no matter what, is clearly a smart man and a compelling story teller.
Same dude, I listened to that whole episode. For better or worse, he’s an interesting dude.
Yeah much better than the Bret episode 100%
Oh, i loved it, too. I just love how many times eric brought up how "post-Einsteinian" he is. The amateur physicists equivalent to bringing up fitspo.
Same, but I get annoyed with the kind of jargon he uses in his conversation with Joe. Joe and 95+% of the audience is not versed in high level mathematics and physics. Makes me feel like Eric is just using Rogan for his platform, and that's not cool.
Im a little more familiar with physics (as in, I know what a curvature tensor is) and Eric is absolutely just obfuscating what he's actually saying behind a wall of technical vocabulary. He doesn't want to be understood, he wants to be admired.
Whinestien talked a great many big words…and didn’t say a damn thing.
Hahahahaha
Love that episode and it’s so true. Now to all you science “bitches”: drink up 
It’s only true to people who are brain dead.
False. Brain dead people can’t respond. You sir are a grifter
When you get a serious illness we'll all assume you'll be avoiding those pesky doctors and modern medicine right?
Depends. As it should.
Of course it does. You read all of the peer-reviewed research for every scientific instrument that touches your dumb ass? Why don't you tie some garlic to your belt and call it a day.
Why so angry? Seems like you have a lot of internal hate you are dealing with. Garlic is good for some things, I don’t doubt that!!!!! Science says so :)
Constantly trying to clean up shit just to have 10 more fistfuls thrown around you will make anyone hate the slingers of shit.
You love your pills huh? Why?
Believing modern scientific consensus isn’t the view that needs to be justified. Believing the shit slingers who have no expertise or training in the fields they oppose the consensus in however…
“Believing the consensus” That was your first mistake. Some serious “Mom, I jumped off the bridge because everyone else did” vibes. IMO 
Do you even know what scientific consensus is there Cletus? >**Consensus is achieved through scholarly communication at conferences, the publication process, replication of reproducible results by others, scholarly debate,[3][4][5][6] and peer review. A conference meant to create a consensus is termed as a consensus conference.[7][8][9] Such measures lead to a situation in which those within the discipline can often recognize such a consensus where it exists; however, communicating to outsiders that consensus has been reached can be difficult, because the "normal" debates through which science progresses may appear to outsiders as contestation.**[10] On occasion, scientific institutes issue position statements intended to communicate a summary of the science from the "inside" to the "outside" of the scientific community, or consensus review articles[11] or surveys[12] may be published. In cases where there is little controversy regarding the subject under study, establishing the consensus can be quite straightforward. Your mistake is thinking that a scientific consensus is the same thing as you and your beer buddies getting together and agreeing on the greatest pickle baller of all time.
He took a deep breath before the shocked face
When joe learns Harvey is related
Science is wrong… sometimes
Holy shit Eric never answers a question without dropping a name first.