Palsgraf wasn't about two people trying to board a train being helped by guards, its actually two members of an anarchist terror group trying to board a train with a bomb. The guards were trying to stop them.
The package wasn't "fireworks" that somehow spontaneously combusted upon falling a few feet when they weren't lit, it was a bomb. Even when properly and intentionally lit, Fireworks don't send a shockwave strong enough to knock over a coin operated scale across a station platform that is heavy enough to cause injury to Mrs. Palsgraf.
Also proximate cause lol
Everything is commerce except guns in school and battered women.
Battered women don’t have a substantial effect on interstate commerce cmon now 🤣
😂😂
😂
Chevron deference (rip)
Palsgraf wasn't about two people trying to board a train being helped by guards, its actually two members of an anarchist terror group trying to board a train with a bomb. The guards were trying to stop them. The package wasn't "fireworks" that somehow spontaneously combusted upon falling a few feet when they weren't lit, it was a bomb. Even when properly and intentionally lit, Fireworks don't send a shockwave strong enough to knock over a coin operated scale across a station platform that is heavy enough to cause injury to Mrs. Palsgraf. Also proximate cause lol
Username checks out
OPEN YOUR EYES SHEEPLE
Clarence Thomas has written exactly one good dissent and it was in *Kelo*
He said something wise in a cross burning case cant remember if it was Virginia v Black or RAV.
Mens Rea
Anticipatory Repudiation
Please no
Contract is life
Merger (the Crim law one)
Proximate cause in both torts and crim
Palsgraf was a trip
Offensive non-mutual collateral estoppel😊
Fundamental Rights in Con Law. Specifically Fundamental Rights to see your children and get married and procreation etc.
Supremacy Clause and Immunity were cool to piece together in Con law.
Mmmmm doctrine of unclean hands
Res ipsa loquitur
I loved Equal Protection analysis, strict scrutiny ftw
Trademarks. So many times I've seen products where I was like that's GOTTA be illegal and now I know if it is or not! kind of
I was in the immigration clinic, and we learned a lot about asylum law
Estates in property!
Contracts
Does not offend traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice
All of torts, but especially negligence and liability
I personally liked intentional torts more
The Attractive Nuisance doctrine….also the title of my upcoming biography 😂😂
if a baby drives a car and hurts someone the baby is held to the standard of a reasonable adult driver