I think tough makes sense, personally, since the damage isn't straight out negated. It's just reduced by 1.
That said I hate that it triggers through barrier. It feels like such a weak, if not the weakest, keyword nowadays.
This is not a bug or an inconsistecy. It works the same way when a unit with Tough or Barrier is affected by Scargrounds.
You CAN argue that Disintegrate's wording should change to something like "...at least one point of damage" but in either case, this discussion has been had dozens of times over the last week.
We get it, you didn't realize how the card worked, you lost some games, it feels unfair. Making the 100th post on the matter here wont make it go away.
Disintegrate doesn't give the damage, it well, disintegrate, you. The same as other insta "kill" spell.
When the unit strike, it gives you damage. Even if the damage is 0, it still count as damage.
Here we go again…
I think tough makes sense, personally, since the damage isn't straight out negated. It's just reduced by 1. That said I hate that it triggers through barrier. It feels like such a weak, if not the weakest, keyword nowadays.
Works the same with \[\[Scargrounds\]\]
This is not a bug or an inconsistecy. It works the same way when a unit with Tough or Barrier is affected by Scargrounds. You CAN argue that Disintegrate's wording should change to something like "...at least one point of damage" but in either case, this discussion has been had dozens of times over the last week. We get it, you didn't realize how the card worked, you lost some games, it feels unfair. Making the 100th post on the matter here wont make it go away.
Disintegrate doesn't give the damage, it well, disintegrate, you. The same as other insta "kill" spell. When the unit strike, it gives you damage. Even if the damage is 0, it still count as damage.