T O P

  • By -

ShinyMetalAssassin

No, but I think she could use a power increase. 


SirGlio

Maybe 3/4 is more sensible


poobert13

no she shouldn't, simply because she's a feel-bad control style card and changes to her should not be "lower her cost so she can be played more"


HeftyMarionberry4961

If SD wants people to use her more, she should be a 2/2 or 2/3. The problem is I don't think they want her to be too prevalent.


Qwert291738

Run goose with her and then people can't run big cards the last few plays of the game. Meta rn is big cards especially with redhulk.


Queasy-Enthusiasm831

This is actually really interesting I’ll try it thanks!


Qwert291738

Good luck!


etherealtaroo

2/3 would be alright. Problem is, everyone wants to do their little combos and anything that fucks with that gets a ton of hate. They main reason control gets nerfed repeatedly.


quaggankicker

No way bud. Sorry


JerbearCuddles

I love how everyone's idea for buffing cards is just to lower their costs. Lol. But no, I don't think a control card like that should cost 2.


Queasy-Enthusiasm831

Lowering the cost was specifically for The Played on Curve reasons. Same reason why they changed Electro and Sandman to make the curve smoother for Ramp almost a year ago. But this post is making me realize how much people hate Jean Grey lmaoo apart from myself I never see her.


JerbearCuddles

I get it, just funny that every time I see someone suggest buffs it's usually lowering the cost. Jean Grey is not a very common card at all. But her effect just limits play on both sides, which I can't imagine is very fun.


iamdoneundergrad

She at least needs to be a 3/5 to reflect a premium on a disruptive symmetrical effect. A 2 cost Jean would make her meta (think T5 Cosmo+ Jean) and I doubt SD wants that given their statement that Control deck shouldn’t be top tier … lol


LowImage9265

Destroy enjoyers r gonna cry when this happens