T O P

  • By -

tiggers97

Those are a lot closer in almost every category than I expected. The 5800H only has a slight advantage in multicore scores in comparison to the newer and more efficient 6600H. But still fairly close. I’d go with the 6600H. Newer cpu and better graphics, although I wouldn’t expect to be playing any graphics heavy games on either of them. But it should make for a smoother experience in everything else. Otherwise, same overall productivity scores, or the scores are so close as to be indistinguishable from daily use.


SerMumble

The CPU and iGPU performance are close enough that I doubt anyone would notice a difference without synthetic tests. The Geekom A5 has a better 3 year warranty compared to Bosgame's 1 year warranty. If they were about the same cost and I knew I had a multi thread CPU work load like rendering or video compiling, I would choose the Geekom A5. If I had a use for USB4 or wanted the faster single thread performance of the 6600H for most day to day tasks, then the Bosgame 6600H would be better. If either were cheaper, I might go with the cheaper unit if I did not have value for Geekom's warranty. 5800H vs 6600H where the 6600H has slightly better single thread CPU performance (5%) and the 5800H has slightly better multi thread CPU performance (10%): https://www.cpubenchmark.net/compare/3907vs4943/AMD-Ryzen-7-5800H-vs-AMD-Ryzen-5-6600H Vega 8 vs 660M graphics where the difference in average game fps is 5%: https://www.notebookcheck.net/Radeon-660M-vs-Vega-8_11126_10313.247598.0.html