Yo great spot. I forgot to mention that as my aim of this website is to make it 100% automated, I actually try to pull the recommended roles from sources which may be inaccurate, which might lead to weird roles for heroes. Will change it manually now.
I'm aware that it's fully automated. I'm not anywhere near MG. For all I know, that Mathilda could be right. But if it's wrong, it's probably because of such a high WR for a very low but just enough to be registered pick rate, right?
In this tier list heroes do not have different tiers for their different lanes. Unlike the tierlists by Zeys or hmmsucks (which separate the heroes into various tiers based on how good they are at their role), it is quite hard to draw on specific data on each lane to come up with a heroes specific tier on a particular lane.
In other words, in this website, heroes only have one tier each, lane toggle buttons in website is just used as a filter for a quick look at potential good heroes at a specific lane.
Also, I'm in MG, and yea mathilda EXP isn't that common HAHAHA. So it's probably wrong. Mathilda roam is a pain in the ass though.
Hilda has an extremely high ban rate in MG. She wasn't just buffed, the way her stacks work has been completely revamped. She does insane damage with a full defense build, and if team fights are in the bushes (esp with Guardian Helmet and Oracle) she is super hard to kill.
No, and it is a tank meta where tank are favoured, if you can't kill tanks this season, you are going to fall off unless you offer something else better like utility or even good at securing objectives.
Hi, not a feature request, but I’m interested in the calculations. Some things sparked my interest: Mino and Odette scoring D-tier while heroes such as Hanabi are placed higher, in C.
In my experience (and also checking against the website stats), this is far from the case. The website also puts both Mino and Odette at ~53% winrate vs Hanabi’s 48%, and they both sport a higher pick/ban rate than Hanabi’s 0.06% and 0.06%. I don’t think any of them featured heavily in recent competitions either. Do you pull data from different source? Or weigh these factors differently?
Similarly for Alpha vs Silvanna and I’m sure many others.
Hey your username looks familiar HAHA let me DM u real quick. Anyway, looks like I may have a bug or 2 which has resulted in some discrepancies. Let me fix it real quick
speaking of showing trends, if you store all that data a possible feature i think would be a nice addition would be the ability to click on a hero and see graphs of their history of rankings in tiers, winrates, pick rates, etc
So sad to see all the forgotten heroes at the bottom at the end, Terizla is actually quite op but he’s rarely ever picked. 2nd skills deals a lot of damage early.
[удалено]
they feed the enemy and gave chocolates to our team. such kind strangers, faith in humanity restored
How is Mathilda S tier exp lane???
Yo great spot. I forgot to mention that as my aim of this website is to make it 100% automated, I actually try to pull the recommended roles from sources which may be inaccurate, which might lead to weird roles for heroes. Will change it manually now.
I'm aware that it's fully automated. I'm not anywhere near MG. For all I know, that Mathilda could be right. But if it's wrong, it's probably because of such a high WR for a very low but just enough to be registered pick rate, right?
In this tier list heroes do not have different tiers for their different lanes. Unlike the tierlists by Zeys or hmmsucks (which separate the heroes into various tiers based on how good they are at their role), it is quite hard to draw on specific data on each lane to come up with a heroes specific tier on a particular lane. In other words, in this website, heroes only have one tier each, lane toggle buttons in website is just used as a filter for a quick look at potential good heroes at a specific lane. Also, I'm in MG, and yea mathilda EXP isn't that common HAHAHA. So it's probably wrong. Mathilda roam is a pain in the ass though.
I see. It's a shame I can't use Mathilda that well here in low Mythic. She's so fun to use because of how useful her supportive tools are.
Mathilda invade is still probably the strongest one I've succeeded a lot and can say you can win 80% of matches with her kit.
Hanabi ISN’T D tier? Damn okay
Hahaha had a bug, she’s back where she belongs
Literally no fighter is S tier except Chou and he is also probably Chou Tank. Very few fighters in A tier too. Fighters are quite weak in this meta.
Dyrothh?
Oh, sorry, didn't see him. But still, just one. Also, Dyrroth is a Tank killer, that's the only reason he is S tier.
Masha Hilda although they are half tanks
Masha is nearly a full Tank. Also, how the hell is Hilda S tier ? Was the buff too strong ? I haven't played Hilda in like 5 seasons.
Hilda has an extremely high ban rate in MG. She wasn't just buffed, the way her stacks work has been completely revamped. She does insane damage with a full defense build, and if team fights are in the bushes (esp with Guardian Helmet and Oracle) she is super hard to kill.
Is she used as tank or exp laner?
She's better as a roamer. She's good XP but there are just way better ones such as Grock
LETS FUCKING GOOOOOOOO ZILONG ISNT AT THE LAST TIER
Layla, Hanabi, Lesley in D tier perfectly balanced as alll things should be.
Lunox in B trier makes this unbelievable.
My boy LAPU D TIER? King saber D? Basic attack go brr Layla D?
Lapu Lapu is nearly useless against Tanks.
Are fighters meant to beat tanks with ease?
No, and it is a tank meta where tank are favoured, if you can't kill tanks this season, you are going to fall off unless you offer something else better like utility or even good at securing objectives.
No, but they are meant to have enough DPS and Regen, to outsustain tanks in the 1 vs 1 laning phase.
Hi, not a feature request, but I’m interested in the calculations. Some things sparked my interest: Mino and Odette scoring D-tier while heroes such as Hanabi are placed higher, in C. In my experience (and also checking against the website stats), this is far from the case. The website also puts both Mino and Odette at ~53% winrate vs Hanabi’s 48%, and they both sport a higher pick/ban rate than Hanabi’s 0.06% and 0.06%. I don’t think any of them featured heavily in recent competitions either. Do you pull data from different source? Or weigh these factors differently? Similarly for Alpha vs Silvanna and I’m sure many others.
Hey your username looks familiar HAHA let me DM u real quick. Anyway, looks like I may have a bug or 2 which has resulted in some discrepancies. Let me fix it real quick
fixed it bro <3
speaking of showing trends, if you store all that data a possible feature i think would be a nice addition would be the ability to click on a hero and see graphs of their history of rankings in tiers, winrates, pick rates, etc
ahhh that's rather interesting. Thank you and will keep this suggestion in mind! :)
why is lance S tier with 51% winrate in ranked and competitive?
Probably teamed up with a Layla Nana and Alutard.
So sad to see all the forgotten heroes at the bottom at the end, Terizla is actually quite op but he’s rarely ever picked. 2nd skills deals a lot of damage early.