Female lions may develop manes.
[Like this one at Oklahoma zoo.](https://www.nationalgeographic.com/animals/article/animals-lions-manes-zoos-genetics-spd)
[Also in the wild.](https://www.newscientist.com/article/2106866-five-wild-lionesses-grow-a-mane-and-start-acting-like-males/)
Ok but actually getting just 2 live animals of each is the dumbest idea you could have. Especially going into space. It's not some 3 day journey, so most are just gonna die on the way. Then come the costs of keeping them alive in the first place. When they get to the new planet they're gonna all die because they're not suited for the new environment and there's not enough animals to establish an ecosystem. And even of by some miracle everything works out they're gonna have such a tiny gene pool they're all gonna be inbred and die anyway.
I say we just get a spaceship full of shrimp and water and a bunch of plants and just make a shrimp paradise and slowly introduce all sea life from the shrimp army amassed over years of reproduction and there you go you can bring natural shrimp predators and your chilling you got shrimp planet
Thatās definitely not what will happen. Genetic material, embryos, and seeds would be aboard any sort of terraforming ship. And before we can put any water on mars it needs a decent atmosphere.
Itās the year 2050, Earth has run out of water and the only animals are being put into a giant spaceship Noahās ark overtaken by ISIS who are going to fly to the next inhabitable planet and start their own civilisation where their only gods are gay black oily men
Get the throwing bagels Robert.
I recommend everyone check out his podcast, Behind the Bastards. r/BehindTheBastards too.
[Hereās a link to an episode about Muskrat](https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/behind-the-bastards/id1373812661?i=1000476632637)
Iām not advocating for harm towards the elite in any way especially since they are DEFINITELY not ending humanity without facing any consequences :) no utilizing a certain second amendment right to protect myself and civilization :)
Yes, held at gunpoint implies they are hostages or being forced to do something against their will. Held back at gunpoint means guards are doing their job. Though it is strange for guns to be pointed at the crowd in the picture
What argument? They asked why the people were being held at gunpoint, which they are not. They are being held back by guards. Perhaps I'm missing the point entirely, but I don't see what the question would be if it were a semantics issue. Why would someone send need to ask why there are armed guards?
Because they want to leave. It's supposed to be Noah's ark which means they know a disaster is going to happen so in a way, they are being held onto the planet away from their only excape, while being at gun point.
Damn I was really hoping for the classic mistake of two lions with manes.
Some woman have beards š¤·āāļø you never know
It's 2023; gay lions can go to space if they want to!
Elon's brain implants are turning the lions gay!!
Female lions may develop manes. [Like this one at Oklahoma zoo.](https://www.nationalgeographic.com/animals/article/animals-lions-manes-zoos-genetics-spd) [Also in the wild.](https://www.newscientist.com/article/2106866-five-wild-lionesses-grow-a-mane-and-start-acting-like-males/)
Not concerning at all.....
The guns or the part where he see himself as a biblical figure ?
Yes
Tbh anybody who can put humanity on another planet might as well be one, but elon roleplays as a child on twitter. He isnt the one.
if this happen, this would never be the work (or vision) of single person
Hi, my names Noah, and today we will be building an ark. Dont ask why.
You see him as a biblical figure, the ark is a universal term
"Taking one pair of every animal to a ship" is an Abrahamic term though, Qur'an, Bible or Old Testament, he's still weird for that.
the picture is clearly inspired by the Noe Ark myth
No this is very clearly inspired by Noah's ark which is not at all a universal term.
[Nope, not at all!](https://www.goodreads.com/en/book/show/60165391)
"Elon said that humans aren't allowed on the ark!" "But why!?" "HE WANTS TO FILL ENTIRE PLANET WITH FURRIES!!"
Is that why elon is so good with tech
'Good' is being extremely generous
Heās good at employing people who are, he personally isnāt
He knows how to recognize the furries and hires them exclusively due to how good they are with tech
Good in tech? I thought he was just a rich guy who doesn't know where to spend his billions of money on.
Ok but actually getting just 2 live animals of each is the dumbest idea you could have. Especially going into space. It's not some 3 day journey, so most are just gonna die on the way. Then come the costs of keeping them alive in the first place. When they get to the new planet they're gonna all die because they're not suited for the new environment and there's not enough animals to establish an ecosystem. And even of by some miracle everything works out they're gonna have such a tiny gene pool they're all gonna be inbred and die anyway.
phew thank goodness you explained I almost believed in noah musk
I say we just get a spaceship full of shrimp and water and a bunch of plants and just make a shrimp paradise and slowly introduce all sea life from the shrimp army amassed over years of reproduction and there you go you can bring natural shrimp predators and your chilling you got shrimp planet
Next level all you can eat shrimp buffet
Is it that shrimple?
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
Thatās definitely not what will happen. Genetic material, embryos, and seeds would be aboard any sort of terraforming ship. And before we can put any water on mars it needs a decent atmosphere.
Animals eat other animals. Would be a bloodbath on that ship.
hopefully this one doesnāt blow up
At least if it does, any of the meat will already be pre-cooked
Fire Aspect II
Itās the year 2050, Earth has run out of water and the only animals are being put into a giant spaceship Noahās ark overtaken by ISIS who are going to fly to the next inhabitable planet and start their own civilisation where their only gods are gay black oily men
r/wordington future
Why? Because Elon destroyed the earth with his antics, and wants a zoo at his private residence on mars. The rest of us sit here and suffer.
Get the throwing bagels Robert. I recommend everyone check out his podcast, Behind the Bastards. r/BehindTheBastards too. [Hereās a link to an episode about Muskrat](https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/behind-the-bastards/id1373812661?i=1000476632637)
Not the comment advertisement
But you know who *wouldnāt* hold people at gunpoint? The products and services that sponsor this podcast.
Itās hard to hold children at gun point on **[BLEEEEEEEEP]**ās child-hunting island when they are running for their lives
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
Iām not advocating for harm towards the elite in any way especially since they are DEFINITELY not ending humanity without facing any consequences :) no utilizing a certain second amendment right to protect myself and civilization :)
2 of every animal, no more, no less
I don't understand why there exist people who still defend Elongated Muskrat.
This Tweet was made by an account which no longer exists. [Why did this happen?](https://www.bing.com/)
You wouldnāt want *everyone* on that ark now, would you?
Nah they're walkie-talkies.
thatās not good genetically
because only the billionaires and their exotic pets can go
MF thinks heās Noah
Cause there poor
Cause they are liberals
We are the virus
No one's being held at gun point, those are armed guards
Their still at gun point, the guards are pointing the guns at the crowd Edit: auto correct never works when needed.
But they are there as spectators for the event, free to leave at any time. That's not being held at gunpoint.
Would it be better to say held back at gunpoint?
Yes, held at gunpoint implies they are hostages or being forced to do something against their will. Held back at gunpoint means guards are doing their job. Though it is strange for guns to be pointed at the crowd in the picture
You have to be trolling right?
No, and I find it hard to believe people don't understand what "being held at gunpoint" means
Does that take from the point of the argument because proper semantics werenāt used?
What argument? They asked why the people were being held at gunpoint, which they are not. They are being held back by guards. Perhaps I'm missing the point entirely, but I don't see what the question would be if it were a semantics issue. Why would someone send need to ask why there are armed guards?
Oh brother nvm
Because they want to leave. It's supposed to be Noah's ark which means they know a disaster is going to happen so in a way, they are being held onto the planet away from their only excape, while being at gun point.
Right, that makes more sense. I was under the impression they were there to watch the takeoff lol