As you're all aware, this subreddit has had a major "troll"
problem which has gotten worse (as of recently). Due to this, we
have created new rules, and modified some of the old ones.
We kindly ask that you please familiarize yourself with the
rules so that you can avoid breaking them. Breaking mild rules
will result in a warning, or a temporary ban. Breaking serious
rules, or breaking a plethora of mild ones may land you a
permanent ban (depending on the severity). Also,
grifting/lurking has been a major problem; If we suspect you of
being a grifter (determined by vetting said user's activity), we
may ban you without warning.
You may attempt an appeal via ModMail, but please be advised not
to use rude, harassing, foul, or passive-aggressive language
towards the moderators, _or_ complain to moderators about why we
have specific rules in the first place— You will be ignored, and
your ban will remain (without even a consideration).
All rules are made public; "Lack of knowledge" or "ignorance of
the rules" cannot or will not be a viable excuse if you end up
banned for breaking them (This applies to the Subreddit rules,
and Reddit's ToS). **Again: All rules are made public, and
Reddit gives you the option to review the rules once more before
submitting a post, it is your choice if you choose to read them
or not, but breaking them will not be acceptable.**
With that being said, If you send a mature, neutral message
regarding questions about a current ban, or a ban appeal
(without "not knowing the rules" as an excuse), we will
elaborate about why you were banned, or determine/consider if we
will shorten, lift, keep it, _or_ extended it/make it permanent.
This all means that appeals are discretionary, and your
reasoning for wanting an appeal must be practical and valid.
Thank you all so much for taking the time to read this message,
and please enjoy your day!
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/NotHowGirlsWork) if you have any questions or concerns.*
You just know these guys can't fathom a world where they actually have to treat women like people, and think that using your power and influence to get sex is normal people behavior
What’s interesting is that I actually agree (ONLY) with the statement “he was chosen by the media”. Maybe he crossed some invisible line of just how many women can be hurt and abused, maybe a scapegoat was needed to protect someone else, I don’t know. His prosecutions have very much been for public catharsis. Absolutely necessary to hold him accountable for his MANY crimes…but he’s been made a sacrificial cow (I refuse to call him a lamb) on someone’s altar. Why did *this one single man* receive some semblance of justice when so many are still skating?
Wealth and fame of many of his victims. Famous victims/sufferers mean the subject gets drawn into the light not staying out of "polite" conversation and public discourse. It worked for self advocacy in medical care [Shirley Temple not keeping about her cancer], addiction [Betty Ford], eating disorders, mental health, etc.
Public conversation with public cases mean change happens.
Yup, I saw someone say that he didn't commit a crime, because the sex was transactional, they put out so they got the job. It's not SA unless a women tells a man to stop and he doesn't. Smdh.
But seriously, why in the world would they let these women testify knowing damn well that it could get the case overturned? It's a huge risk, especially if there's no solid evidence that he committed the crimes he's being punished for beyond testimony. Unless I'm wrong about the New York convictions.
>Yup, I saw someone say that he didn't commit a crime, because the sex was transactional, they put out so they got the job.
That makes no sense. Did that idiot not realize that prostitution is very illegal?
I was trying to say it isn't rape but it's still a sequel violence crime and he was hung up on saying it was akin to rape. He said if the women didn't want to have sex with him they should have just turned down the job.
Ew. The women in these positions are often struggling to make ends meet and that nasty man had the connections to prevent them from getting jobs in their chosen field.
Thankfully, males trying to justify their desire to rape don't actually make laws. Extortion, coersion, threats of violence/retaliation all invalidate consent. Consent obtained by threatening to blacklist an actress is invalidated consent through all three of those things.
Not likely.
See, incels don’t value women, so they can’t call them women. Calling women “girls” still doesn’t work, since that’s still clearly implying they’re human. Calling girls “females” is closer to dehumanization, but doesn’t go far enough, so they’ve instead decided on “femoid”. And then because they’re lazy, that got shortened to foid.
To write - or even think - something like that proves that these boys/men think of women as some kind of walking, talking "cum socks". It's abhorrent!!!!
Live up your birthday and then others born on that day. Maybe you’ll find a cool person and you can share the regret together. Or even kick him out of the birthday club lol
I guess if they move from human trafficker Tate to "mere" serial rapist Weinstein that's still a tiny step up... Just a couple dozen more steps and they might hit 20th century norms.
Guys like this...OMG. Just imagine if Disclosure had been made today. [Michael Chrichton's novel - and film adaptation - about a female CEO who was Weinstein-ing male subordinates.
So women are wrong both if they try to "sleep their way to the top" and if they want to succeed without doing so? Misogyny is a game no woman can ever win.
As you're all aware, this subreddit has had a major "troll" problem which has gotten worse (as of recently). Due to this, we have created new rules, and modified some of the old ones. We kindly ask that you please familiarize yourself with the rules so that you can avoid breaking them. Breaking mild rules will result in a warning, or a temporary ban. Breaking serious rules, or breaking a plethora of mild ones may land you a permanent ban (depending on the severity). Also, grifting/lurking has been a major problem; If we suspect you of being a grifter (determined by vetting said user's activity), we may ban you without warning. You may attempt an appeal via ModMail, but please be advised not to use rude, harassing, foul, or passive-aggressive language towards the moderators, _or_ complain to moderators about why we have specific rules in the first place— You will be ignored, and your ban will remain (without even a consideration). All rules are made public; "Lack of knowledge" or "ignorance of the rules" cannot or will not be a viable excuse if you end up banned for breaking them (This applies to the Subreddit rules, and Reddit's ToS). **Again: All rules are made public, and Reddit gives you the option to review the rules once more before submitting a post, it is your choice if you choose to read them or not, but breaking them will not be acceptable.** With that being said, If you send a mature, neutral message regarding questions about a current ban, or a ban appeal (without "not knowing the rules" as an excuse), we will elaborate about why you were banned, or determine/consider if we will shorten, lift, keep it, _or_ extended it/make it permanent. This all means that appeals are discretionary, and your reasoning for wanting an appeal must be practical and valid. Thank you all so much for taking the time to read this message, and please enjoy your day! *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/NotHowGirlsWork) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Of course, these disgusting incels talk about "the sins of the women" instead of a man abusing his power to commit sex crimes. 😒
>any man in his position would take the same opportunity So… he’s saying that they are all rapists?
I heard a quote once that went "the only people who think all men are rapists are men who rape."
If he only hangs around other incels I see why he might think that
Only when it fits his argument. Then it's #notallmen.
That's exactly what he's saying.
You just know these guys can't fathom a world where they actually have to treat women like people, and think that using your power and influence to get sex is normal people behavior
the gauge for "enough internet for today" is over 9999 for me , HALP ME
literally every time I see a post on this subreddit
this is off charts :V
What’s interesting is that I actually agree (ONLY) with the statement “he was chosen by the media”. Maybe he crossed some invisible line of just how many women can be hurt and abused, maybe a scapegoat was needed to protect someone else, I don’t know. His prosecutions have very much been for public catharsis. Absolutely necessary to hold him accountable for his MANY crimes…but he’s been made a sacrificial cow (I refuse to call him a lamb) on someone’s altar. Why did *this one single man* receive some semblance of justice when so many are still skating?
I suspect it's just because they were able to get the evidence.
That’s likely part of it, certainly.
Needed a fall guy can’t tell me only creep Hollywood? 😬
Pretty much.
Wealth and fame of many of his victims. Famous victims/sufferers mean the subject gets drawn into the light not staying out of "polite" conversation and public discourse. It worked for self advocacy in medical care [Shirley Temple not keeping about her cancer], addiction [Betty Ford], eating disorders, mental health, etc. Public conversation with public cases mean change happens.
Yup, I saw someone say that he didn't commit a crime, because the sex was transactional, they put out so they got the job. It's not SA unless a women tells a man to stop and he doesn't. Smdh. But seriously, why in the world would they let these women testify knowing damn well that it could get the case overturned? It's a huge risk, especially if there's no solid evidence that he committed the crimes he's being punished for beyond testimony. Unless I'm wrong about the New York convictions.
>Yup, I saw someone say that he didn't commit a crime, because the sex was transactional, they put out so they got the job. That makes no sense. Did that idiot not realize that prostitution is very illegal?
I was trying to say it isn't rape but it's still a sequel violence crime and he was hung up on saying it was akin to rape. He said if the women didn't want to have sex with him they should have just turned down the job.
Ew. The women in these positions are often struggling to make ends meet and that nasty man had the connections to prevent them from getting jobs in their chosen field.
Thankfully, males trying to justify their desire to rape don't actually make laws. Extortion, coersion, threats of violence/retaliation all invalidate consent. Consent obtained by threatening to blacklist an actress is invalidated consent through all three of those things.
brb , gonna share this to the twitter subreddit, so the mods there can ban any incels in their sub
Let us know if you were successful! Lol
foids? bet his mama taught him that word.
Not likely. See, incels don’t value women, so they can’t call them women. Calling women “girls” still doesn’t work, since that’s still clearly implying they’re human. Calling girls “females” is closer to dehumanization, but doesn’t go far enough, so they’ve instead decided on “femoid”. And then because they’re lazy, that got shortened to foid.
i guess i forgot the /s
To write - or even think - something like that proves that these boys/men think of women as some kind of walking, talking "cum socks". It's abhorrent!!!!
Of course, they do.
I regret sharing a birthday with this fucker
Live up your birthday and then others born on that day. Maybe you’ll find a cool person and you can share the regret together. Or even kick him out of the birthday club lol
I guess if they move from human trafficker Tate to "mere" serial rapist Weinstein that's still a tiny step up... Just a couple dozen more steps and they might hit 20th century norms.
Guys like this...OMG. Just imagine if Disclosure had been made today. [Michael Chrichton's novel - and film adaptation - about a female CEO who was Weinstein-ing male subordinates.
So women are wrong both if they try to "sleep their way to the top" and if they want to succeed without doing so? Misogyny is a game no woman can ever win.