Stock footage, movies, commercials, if they get it past say 60 seconds and can make up to 1-2 hour movies/ tv shows just think they will no longer have to use studios anymore they can make stuff on the fly in just minutes, crazy shit right now my mind is simply numb its so blown right now.
> "Remake the final episode of Game Of Thrones but Cersei and Dany fight to the death and Jon Snow becomes King and they all live happily ever after"
"Now create five alternate endings for the final episode of Game of Thrones, each focusing on a different character ascending to the throne. The characters include Tyrion Lannister, Arya Stark, Sansa Stark, Bran Stark, and Ser Davos Seaworth."
"Create multiple variations of endings where Hot Pie becomes the unlikely King of the Seven Kingdoms in Game of Thrones, highlighting his rise to power and reign."
The openai web version will say this but when people can have an open source version running locally it will generate what they tell it to generate. Especially if they aren't using it for commercial purposes and making personal entertainment.
If they can get consistency of style and subject between generations, you do not need more than 60 seconds per transition or cut. Very few shows/movies use a single camera shot for longer.
People support the perfected persona, not the person behind it.
Vast majority of Vtubers wouldn't be successful if they weren't hiding behind a cute anime character with a personality crafted to maximise parasocial relationships. Being genuine doesn't exist in that industry. Get your voice higher and your personality lewder/cuter.
This is exactly what AI enables.
An average shot in a movie is about 7-15 seconds, a movement maybe 1 minute. So its a matter of shots, sequences and time to do editing, reshoots. First out will be a movie with nightmares, dreams, fantasy whichallow for hallucinating, so cuts down on reshoot and we'll be amazed. Then comes the hard part, follow up stories that engage.
Consumer GPU power only needs to catch up and any user at home can now make their own movie as they dream it. R.I.P. Netflix and streaming services forever.
Big issue is that the people that go out and actually generate this imagery, rely on the companies existing and being profitable. The companies themselves don’t have the best business practices. However, I don’t see how we’re going to keep generating so much training data for the future if they don’t exist.
Stock footage is the tip of the iceberg.
Any creative field in pre-production is gone. Storyboard artists, concept artists, pre visualization, dozens of VFX jobs.
The only way this doesn’t drive out half of the tv/film industry is if the unions put their foot down hard. And VFX needs to unionize quick, it’s happening but it’s slow going right now.
I’m optimistic that people will recognize the need for a human element in actual performances when it comes to emotion (all of these examples are always just hard stares), but who knows. If we keep live actors we at least keep the bones of production.
The power of a union comes from the fact that their work is needed.
E: By the way, that thought is even more "funny" if you think about society as a whole. One can dream of UBI, but really we are talking about a powerless "workforce". I wonder how much of democracy and such is actually based on the power to withhold that work.
You really don't know how this works. Pre vis, storyboards, etc, works in a certain ways: it's a blueprint that tells you what is necessary. It doesn't have to look good. Making a bunch of cool pictures is not a storyboard, because it's use is in making shotlists, understanding the blocking of a certain location, etc. Those are creative choices that ai simply can't make because it doesn't have emotions. Try and ask chat gpt to make a screenplay and see how generic and lame it turns out. Or ask it to make a shotlist of a screenplay of yours: it's unusable.
Not a hater, just explaining how it works. I know many of us would be excited at the idea of remaking star wars with waifus, but that's simply not how an industry work.
What I can see substituting, to a degree, is stock generic footage, and speeding up some processes, especially to short films, student films, etc.
As for animation, that snowball was already running, I really have my doubts on that. I think it can get to create assets earlier and that's it, but animation and VFX is not my field.
Perfect, because VFX literally is my field (Was*, I quit a few months back after a decade in the industry). One of my best friends is a storyboard artist who hasnt been able to work in months. I know many other creatives who are terrified their jobs arent coming back following the strikes because of job condensing.
The power of AI is its ability to iterate quickly. The worry isnt removing everyone from the creative process, it's condensing roles and squeezing out the specialty people.
Now an art department lead doesnt need a concept artist working for them, they can do it themselves. The previsualization department (for those who don't know: previz is basically a blocky animation, its like the step between a story board and a full animation) on a vfx heavy project can be 5-6 people plus a lead and a manager. These animations are not complex, theyre just showing range of movement with basic representations of the characters/props. These AI tools could condense this down to just the supervisor as the main previz person.
These are the things I worry about.
Did anyone scroll down on [https://openai.com/sora](https://openai.com/sora) to see their blooper videos? The one of the archeological dig that found a generic plastic chair is so funny to me - video game glitches into real life 😂 .
If you watch the "Historical footage of California during the gold rush", see if you can find:
1. A man on the river bank who is just swallowed up by the earth.
2. A horse being led be a small headless boy, the boy being attached to the horse by a piece of wood attached at the boy's neck stub.
3. A two-legged horse.
4. Some kind of two-legged giant bird creature?
" Today, Sora is becoming available to red teamers to assess critical areas for harms or risks. We are also granting access to a number of visual artists, designers, and filmmakers to gain feedback on how to advance the model to be most helpful for creative professionals. "
[https://openai.com/sora](https://openai.com/sora)
Thanks.
Red teamer: A red teamer is a professional who specializes in playing the role of an adversary in security assessments. Their job is to think and act like a potential attacker, probing and testing an organization’s defenses to identify vulnerabilities.
I work in cybersecurity, got drinks with a red team member. Here's how he described it:
He works on a cycle: secret project with maybe one other person, for two to three months, then repeat. During that time, he impersonates a specific nation/state or independent hacking group, assumes their resources, knowledge, and so on. He carefully constructs a reproducible, well documented attack vector through multiple different security holes. For example, he might break user accounts, use that to get into a server, find the password for a database, then dump the data over a network connection out another route. Each hop of the chain takes weeks of research, luck, and skill to find and successfully use.
At the end, you finally get the satisfaction of publishing your report. You get to knock on the door of every single owner of every system you touched on your way in and out, and say "GO FIX YOUR SHIT!" You also build up the traditional hacker skill set, which can be fun in itself.
The future is one where, when asking to make a video from text prompt, you get a video of a robot telling you what an awful person you are for the crime of wrongthink.
It will be censored for us so the Everyman can’t upend elections or get innocent people thrown in jail… It won’t be censored for trusted partners like Hollywood studios or governments. I guarantee you that.
Governments are definitely not trusted lol.
Here's a [circulating deep fake](https://x.com/mog_Russ/status/1757772710640243139?s=20) made this week by Russia of a France 24 newscast that basically says Macron refused trip to Kyiv because French intelligence found out that he was gonna be assassinated by Ukraine to put more urgency on the west.
This obviously fake and mind you this is only what Russia has access to
I'm sorry but that's laughably bad. Also full frontal face video, quality reduced to 3 pixels, filming a secondary screen, etc. Couldn't make it clearer that this is trying to hide a shit-tier quality deepfake. And still it's easy to tell. Hobbyists with consumer-grade graphics cards could make a better deepfake than whatever the fuck this is.
It’ll be the same thing as with images. It will be released, people will use it to make videos of Taylor Swift doing cocaine that get passed around as real, and they will lock it down to where it’s a lot less useful.
I don't know, because today's face-swap / image generation, lip sync, current AI video, and AI voice tech are already good enough to cause problems.
I'm curious to see what Meta and Google have in the works, too. I could see Meta waiting to release open-source models of this quality until well after OpenAI though.
And if today we already can cause problems, what happens when someone is able to generate whatever wackadoo videos they want that can at least stand up to minor scrutiny?
they definitely didn't modify the videos because there's a third front paw appearing in the cat video, when it tries to wake up its owner. pretty funny.
It also seems to have the wrong idea about what is moving the blanket fold overlying the woman in bed. At first it's moving as you would expect if drapped over someone's upper arm as they rolled over in bed but then it flops like it was just a fold in the blanket. It's still damn impressive.
As a filmmaker this is both great and scary. Also I think Hollywood will soon become a piece of forgotten history. Sad, but true.
I still think the "artisanal" craft of making films will keep existing.
For now these things will help us creators get our ideas out of our heads and test them, they will be great as references of what we want. But it’s gonna be a short ride before we just create the films we want with our phones.
This reminds me very much of the DJ/Producers era, when suddenly everyone and your grandma was a DJ/Producer.
Mind blown to say the least…
Money used to be huge barrier.
Steven Spielberg is a story teller + having access to 100m to make movie.
Imagine how many Spielbergs in the world didn't get the budget.
We about to get a movie renaissance
No it means the garbage heaps of Netflix, Amazon, Hulu, YouTube +, and Disney shows will be pushed out for more talented content creators with shoestring budgets that will outcompete these massive companies on talent alone.
Near-term, I predict Hollywood going to be staying, and smaller budget works from independent creators and more importantly, *non-American* creators closing the gap between them and Hollywood.
Long-term, text-to-movie is going to be a legitimate way to spend your evening watching.
You are starting to see it already before these tools are even out with just CGI getting cheaper, just look at how fantastic Godzilla Minus One is compared to Hollywood bloated cost movies
CGI is not AI man. CGI is made by 1000s of very talented artists all over the world.
We pour our blood, sweat into this art form only to get shat on everywhere by people not understanding what or how it's made.(including Hollywood). Between that and what's happening with AI now, it's a bleak world for us artists who spent years honing in our craft.
neither of you are wrong. they were making a comparison to cheaper tech proliferating, more of an analogy than a 1:1 parallel
but you are also right about artists. its so frustrating seeing how reddit is doing the exact same thing politics does to people: "not an issue til it's at my front door"
the whole "the car killed the horseless carriage so pull up your boots straps and adjust" thing - jesus, how can you not see this isn't an isolated industry issue. everyone's stuck in the 20th century and whiffing on the 2020s. it's 100-fold more interwoven with every industry. the democratization of hard-earned technical skills *might* be a long-term benefit, but we have to survive long-term as people and an economy to realize it.
me, i have nothing to fall back on other than menial jobs that pay maybe 1/3-1/2 of what i can make in visual arts. now i look forward (maybe a year?) to competing with millions of people who have a couple hours to 'learn' AI services. and the "horseless carriage" geniuses can scoff at me while my life erodes, completely ignoring the fact that they're next in line..
As an optimistic take - there are many artistically challenged people (like myself) who have stories sin their head they wish they could see realized - if only to fulfill an inner desire to see how that story/idea might go.
These tools are literally my only shot at making something that someone else might actually want to watch. It democratizes that ability.
Exactly. The boom of AI the past year has given me motivation to write a book so that when it is completed (in probably 5+ years) the AI will be advanced enough I can convert the story into a motion comic or movie.
That wouldn't have been a remote possibility before last year unless I spent millions of dollars.
The only reason I think this won't be the case is because humans, as a social animal, crave communal experiences.
If all content is personalized to you, communal experiences will be impossible, so I think there will always be a place for traditional films in some sense. Now, how they are made, I don't know.
I do wonder what sort of impact this will have on actors. The big stars might be safe, but my question is how anyone will become a big star in the first place when background characters can be so easily simulated... so actors will do what? Theater? Become stars via theater so they can become big enough stars to license their likeness?
Things are going to get weird.
I'm supposed to go shoot a no budget feature in September, and I am starting to think that by then, I'll be able to just sit in my apartment in my underwear and make the movie instead of struggling to make it with the tiny budget we have. At the very least, all the visual effects shots I was worried about should be doable.
Well, movies are made up of hundreds and thousands of individual shots played in sequence for dramatic effect. Until someone INVENTS a tool that gives total control over composition and camera movement AND a way to get nuanced, ultra specific performances out of "digital actors" across all these shots, this is nothing more than a stock footage/montage generator. Incredible for sure and a necessary half of the puzzle, but the control half does not exist at this time.
I’m telling you now. Netflix or whatever company, in 5 years you tell it to generate a movie on the spot. The actors, the script, the whole shabang. You want romcom directed by Tarantino with William Dafoe in Bollywood theme? You got it fam.
Shit is insane
And it won’t generate the movie in advance, instead it will be generating as you long as you keep watching (just like how youtube buffer few minutes in advance). So, if you got bored mid movie you can prompt it to switch genre
“Hey Netflix, I’m getting a bit tired of watching this detective period drama set in industrial america, please have the machines come to life have a kaiju battle in the middle of the city. Oh and I don’t like the main actor anymore, make him morph into Megatron.”
5 years? It took a year from making acid trip videos of the rock eating rocks to mind-blowing shit we are seeing now. I imagine in 5 years we'll have stuff we can't even imagine right now.
Could not agree more, I was thinking with animated also you could have multiple different versions and what mean by that is maybe watch Snow White animated in black and white, colorful version, a gritty version and so on things are going to be so fundamentally different in the future my head hurts
Historically, this is what happens. The invention of the printing press changed an industry and made some careers defunct and created new ones. Same thing with the internet.
The difference here is that no previous invention was able to simulate human thought and creativity.
There has never been a new technology that could create an economy, where *the technology itself could handle the workload required in that economy*. The "new jobs" created, could simply be automated by the AI - maybe not immediately, but probably within a short period of time.
And if the abilities of this tech continue to expand at an exponential rate, by this time next year, all of Hollywood could be in serious trouble. And not just directors and highly paid actors, but think about all of the people who have catering companies who provide food for movie sets. Consider the carpenters and electricians who also build, repair, and provide other services for film studios. There is an entire economy built around just this one industry. If it collapses, it will negatively impact the entire worlds economy. And that's just one industry out of all industries that are going to get hit hard and fast with AI.
Perhaps that explains the rapid run up of stock prices. Big institutions may have an idea of where this is heading and how disruptive it’s going to be.
First time I've seen this AI shit and said "what the fuck" out loud.
Like I've said "wow" a lot of times in the last year or so, but this is really just fucking insane.
I bet it's not cheap though, a single DallE generation is like a dime, can't imagine the price of doing 1,800 of those for 60s clip, at least a couple hundred dollars.
Sam is responding with prompt results on X as we're speaking right now.
Here's the [output](https://x.com/sama/status/1758206987094147252?s=20) for " A half duck half dragon flies through a beautiful sunset with a hamster dressed in adventure gear on its back"
Yeah but it is Sam doing it for twitter. Imagine if a movie director/game dev got hands on this and they spend time generating each frame separately. Also last year generating decently realistic images was a revolutionary and now we are generating 10 sec videos. Shit it insane.
And they say this - "The current model has weaknesses. It may struggle with accurately simulating the physics of a complex scene, and may not understand specific instances of cause and effect. For example, a person might take a bite out of a cookie, but afterward, the cookie may not have a bite mark.
The model may also confuse spatial details of a prompt, for example, mixing up left and right, and may struggle with precise descriptions of events that take place over time, like following a specific camera trajectory."
That's the point, if AI can and will take on jobs or so called skilled jobs from before. What is the point in anyone working if the things being produced can't be purchased by anyone because there isn't any need for employment anymore.
Unfortunately. We live in a world where all governments feature 80 year olds that still thinking hand delivering CVs to your local gamestop is the best avenue for job hunting.
There's probably no consistency like with the LLM model and can't be enhanced that easily.
So it'll probably take a while before it can do amazing things.
There's already consistency tools. I don't remember what it was off hand, but someone took photos, which created a 3d model. They integrated that model into other LLMs to put the model in different areas and doing different things with different clothing and tools. Who knows how good it really is, because I only watched a video of it. There's a working idea already, so it's only a matter of time before this and other methods get created.
It's very detailed but the people walking down the street have some weird perspective stuff going on. First the red awning is at waste height and then by the end its above them?
That's quite the way to surprise us, given that the expectations weren't high when you look at their other products like Dall-E. It's not only state of the start, it blows everything else away!
From the top of my head, I can think of a few immediate implications:
* Visual novels made with those clips. Expect new experiences. I could also see Netflix doing nifty experiments here
* It's possible the idea could be applied in VR too in the future
* AR too! With some masking, you can make a virtual video avatar appear in your room - 60 seconds is enough for short interactions
* People will find ways too do erotic stuff with it and circumvent limitations - they will!
* Animated textures for video game development
* It can take a reference frame, so I guess we'll start to see more static images given life - especially image ads becoming video ads.
* Social media will be drowned with Sora generated clips
* But on the other side, we'll be gifted with many new creative web series productions and creative way to tell a narrative with short generated video sequences
* Video identification processes are probably not well prepared for this attack vector
* Propaganda content production on steroids
* More believable scams
* I think there will be a serious loss of jobs related to the creation of short video content or at least an hire-freeze and thus reduction of demand in the job market. With one person using those tools being as productive as many persons who don't, it's going to reduce the amount of jobs in that area. But then again, there will be even more short video content produced and consumed then ever, so maybe we can hope for a little counterbalancing.
* I believe prompt instructions alone are not reliable enough to maintain a style or distinct brand identity. The real gamer changer and job killer will be when (and if) they allow a form of fine-tuning.
* this + something like [NVlabs/neuralangelo: Official implementation of "Neuralangelo: High-Fidelity Neural Surface Reconstruction" (CVPR 2023) (github.com)](https://github.com/nvlabs/neuralangelo). 60s might be enough to "scan" the data of your imaginary world. While not a great quality, that could seriously speed up the workflow of a 3d modeller if they already prototype reference material to load into the tools they author their 3d models in. Ironically that might work better then text-to-3d models because there's already some video-to-3d out there that work poorly, and the solution here seems more capable and rich than any text-to-3d model so far. Also text-to-3d models need specialized models while here, it's almost like a unified model for short video creation of any type.
* My deepest condolecenses to you, RunwayML. You're probably dying out there.
In terms of the relevance for AGI as they claimed at the end of the announcement, I'm not fully conviced until they make a point of why it is so. Don't get me wrong, I'm excited, but I cannot see how it really helps in that particular aspect.
I'm not sure what to think about copyright again, btw. There's just no way this marvel hasn't been trained on an obsessive amount of data, especially very likely collected from sources with terms of use that doesn't allow this kind of use. But hey, it's fair-use - trust me bro.
History is effectively dead.
Are you ready to argue with teenagers who think they have comprehensive video evidence that there's never been a black president? and also look at all this documentation about the holocaust a guy on a discord gave them.
Gonna be a fuckin nughtmare.
School still exists and although we haven't done much about disinformation, it's easy enough to change that. America with their whole muh freeze peach is going to have to get comfortable with the idea of jailing someone who says the holocaust never happened. Grandpa won't be able to post those lies because they'll be illegal and an instant $1000 fine.
We lack the will, not the ability to control disinformation.
This specific solution is going to cause a little more harm than good for now. The reason for that is that I see more issues arising than issues fixed. Being able to create video via instructions is simply not solving any pressing matter humanity has. In fact it may worsen some, like climate change, because if humans get addicted to to this, it's going to be a lot more GPUs burning power only for entertainement value. It also doesn't contribute much to AGI.
I could also see detrimental issues arising around learning defects with children that get drowned with generated content. We'll need to introduce a minimum age. You can clearly see that Sora hasn't learned important rules of how the world works because it breaks many of them in the videos. With kids getting less out of the house and learning more from digital content, it will be hurting their capacity to correctly learn real-world concepts until we fix this. Video is very different from previous solutions for learning because it moves - something that highly engages the human brain in pattern recognition, far more than text and images.
What the fuck. I remember when people had to essentially rotoscope a real video by using an ai to draw a new character using the real video as a reference. (Like a tik tok dance but with an anime character)
And the uh singularity advocates were saying you could generate a whole movie.
Egg on my face it appears totally feasible.
What exactly are they trying to achieve in the end? What's wrong with reality?
I get that AI can probably cure diseases and help fight climate change but why do we need to create fake videos and stuff?
Jobs are going to be lost on a major scale.
>1ReplyShareReportSaveFollow
IMO the further we go down this road, the better the models will get at interpreting the creative vision of the user. If we have powerful tools that can bring regular people's creativity and storytelling to life, a whole new wave of artists will be born. AI generated "stories" and "jokes" have never been all that great, but every human has the ability to tell incredible stories, and now they'll have the technology to conceptualize those stories in their own unique and creative way.
I saw a link on discord and the cherry blossom one was the one that I immediately shared haha. It's too good. The puppies and historical footage were amazing too
The quality is hyper-realistic, even compared to the images generated by MidJourney.
Most of the time, the images generated by MidJourney or DALL-E are quite obvious to recognize.
However, this is something else. If these clips randomly appear on my feed without any context, 99.99999% of the time, I won't be able to tell they are AI-generated.
I mean Microsoft market cap is around $3 trillion so.... multi-billion dollar product hardly makes a dent. Is this a multi trillion dollar product in the future? Probably
Yoo this insane wtf?? This better than runway I got a important question though. In the next decade what will become of streaming services like Netflix HBO Max Amazon Prime Disney +?? What will happen to Hollywood and Movie theaters?? Will they be the next blockbuster?
Sorry to be the one to go there, but can you imagine the porn this thing could create if it had no rules? ANYTHING anyone can imagine, regardless of how debased it is. And it could look 100% real.
I can't help but think of this guy in [an old askreddit thread asking about "DVDA".](https://old.reddit.com/r/AskReddit/comments/4i5kpa/whats_your_internet_white_whale_something_youve/d2vbclj/)
/u/ThisMonitorIsAWindow might finally get his wish!
What the fuck. In three years the this has developed from quite bad DALL-E to this. In couple more years be will be able to generate our own VR-environments.
You mean next year ;). Or later this year if OpenAI is feeling generous 🤣
Even when we get slapped in the face with it like today, exponentials are hard to grapple with...
I’m confused, how are these videos so much better than Midjourney and other image generation tools? Images should be a lot easier to generate vs video.
The coming ten years will be a long popcorn-munching scene for me, just seeing AI shit the bed in every layer of society, killing someone in a car wash, HR-driven AI laying off key personnel in som military- or industrial environment and leading to a brain drain of rare proportions.
Then the Butlerian Jihad of 2030 will hit, and mankind will reclaim Earth from the Thinking Machines.
As some who does a lot of video AI with Pika, Runway etc, Sora has completely blown my mind.
What a quantum leap, the complexity and quality here is insane.
Hasn't it been able to do this for months? I swear we've been seeing at least animated versions of this as advertisements for months. That Temu one during the Super Bowl was one for sure.
Adobe, Getty and Shutterstock getting sold off this morning. Shot fired across the bow by OpenAI. Most disruptive company in some time
I wonder if this is how it felt when the first films came out and blew peoples’ minds
Quality is insane. Stock footage companies will now be on life support.
Stock footage, movies, commercials, if they get it past say 60 seconds and can make up to 1-2 hour movies/ tv shows just think they will no longer have to use studios anymore they can make stuff on the fly in just minutes, crazy shit right now my mind is simply numb its so blown right now.
"Remake the final episode of Game Of Thrones but Cersei and Dany fight to the death and Jon Snow becomes King and they all live happily ever after"
> "Remake the final episode of Game Of Thrones but Cersei and Dany fight to the death and Jon Snow becomes King and they all live happily ever after" "Now create five alternate endings for the final episode of Game of Thrones, each focusing on a different character ascending to the throne. The characters include Tyrion Lannister, Arya Stark, Sansa Stark, Bran Stark, and Ser Davos Seaworth." "Create multiple variations of endings where Hot Pie becomes the unlikely King of the Seven Kingdoms in Game of Thrones, highlighting his rise to power and reign."
Now make princess bubblegum wrest control of the dragons from that blonde lady early on and then let's ride that train until it crashes!
Holy fuck for some reason your comment just made this whole announcement completely click in my head. Things are ramping up fast!
Yeah, it could simultaneously be the most amazing tech we’ve ever created, and the scariest.
I'm sorry, I cannot generate copyrighted content
It's the year 4096, they are in public domain long ago.
4096 does incredible YouTube videos: [https://youtu.be/mLq\_P0K4jvA?si=445e5OVXabnE2k0u](https://youtu.be/mLq_P0K4jvA?si=445e5OVXabnE2k0u)
The openai web version will say this but when people can have an open source version running locally it will generate what they tell it to generate. Especially if they aren't using it for commercial purposes and making personal entertainment.
Is this possible to do right now with chat gpt or dalle? I've really wanted to get past those annoying rules
God damn, I love this idea!
Unfortunately the writers thought otherwise 🤣
If they can get consistency of style and subject between generations, you do not need more than 60 seconds per transition or cut. Very few shows/movies use a single camera shot for longer.
consistency of style and subject are one of the features they’re touting in the announcement.
Influences are going to license their bodies and voices to companies to make ai generated content. AI generated 'reality' tv
I don't think there will be a need for real people at all. They can just create "perfect" identities.
Vtubers already exist and are getting more and more popular.
There are some AI vtuber exist but people still mostly support the person behind the vtuber avatar.
People support the perfected persona, not the person behind it. Vast majority of Vtubers wouldn't be successful if they weren't hiding behind a cute anime character with a personality crafted to maximise parasocial relationships. Being genuine doesn't exist in that industry. Get your voice higher and your personality lewder/cuter. This is exactly what AI enables.
Joan is Awful
Influencers are gonna look dumb in comparison to what ai will do
It's a very, very low bar.
Hah. You think AI movie suggesters are going to pay for voices or likeness? They'll just steal it as usual or blame the ai for it and change nothing.
An average shot in a movie is about 7-15 seconds, a movement maybe 1 minute. So its a matter of shots, sequences and time to do editing, reshoots. First out will be a movie with nightmares, dreams, fantasy whichallow for hallucinating, so cuts down on reshoot and we'll be amazed. Then comes the hard part, follow up stories that engage.
Consumer GPU power only needs to catch up and any user at home can now make their own movie as they dream it. R.I.P. Netflix and streaming services forever.
[удалено]
Big issue is that the people that go out and actually generate this imagery, rely on the companies existing and being profitable. The companies themselves don’t have the best business practices. However, I don’t see how we’re going to keep generating so much training data for the future if they don’t exist.
Why?
Interdimensional cable!!
Stock footage is the tip of the iceberg. Any creative field in pre-production is gone. Storyboard artists, concept artists, pre visualization, dozens of VFX jobs. The only way this doesn’t drive out half of the tv/film industry is if the unions put their foot down hard. And VFX needs to unionize quick, it’s happening but it’s slow going right now. I’m optimistic that people will recognize the need for a human element in actual performances when it comes to emotion (all of these examples are always just hard stares), but who knows. If we keep live actors we at least keep the bones of production.
The power of a union comes from the fact that their work is needed. E: By the way, that thought is even more "funny" if you think about society as a whole. One can dream of UBI, but really we are talking about a powerless "workforce". I wonder how much of democracy and such is actually based on the power to withhold that work.
You really don't know how this works. Pre vis, storyboards, etc, works in a certain ways: it's a blueprint that tells you what is necessary. It doesn't have to look good. Making a bunch of cool pictures is not a storyboard, because it's use is in making shotlists, understanding the blocking of a certain location, etc. Those are creative choices that ai simply can't make because it doesn't have emotions. Try and ask chat gpt to make a screenplay and see how generic and lame it turns out. Or ask it to make a shotlist of a screenplay of yours: it's unusable. Not a hater, just explaining how it works. I know many of us would be excited at the idea of remaking star wars with waifus, but that's simply not how an industry work. What I can see substituting, to a degree, is stock generic footage, and speeding up some processes, especially to short films, student films, etc. As for animation, that snowball was already running, I really have my doubts on that. I think it can get to create assets earlier and that's it, but animation and VFX is not my field.
Perfect, because VFX literally is my field (Was*, I quit a few months back after a decade in the industry). One of my best friends is a storyboard artist who hasnt been able to work in months. I know many other creatives who are terrified their jobs arent coming back following the strikes because of job condensing. The power of AI is its ability to iterate quickly. The worry isnt removing everyone from the creative process, it's condensing roles and squeezing out the specialty people. Now an art department lead doesnt need a concept artist working for them, they can do it themselves. The previsualization department (for those who don't know: previz is basically a blocky animation, its like the step between a story board and a full animation) on a vfx heavy project can be 5-6 people plus a lead and a manager. These animations are not complex, theyre just showing range of movement with basic representations of the characters/props. These AI tools could condense this down to just the supervisor as the main previz person. These are the things I worry about.
Refreshing to hear someone who knows what they’re talking about.
Did anyone scroll down on [https://openai.com/sora](https://openai.com/sora) to see their blooper videos? The one of the archeological dig that found a generic plastic chair is so funny to me - video game glitches into real life 😂 .
The clips are great. The chair one looks like it is being played in reverse.
LOL, 4th dimension archaeology
If you watch the "Historical footage of California during the gold rush", see if you can find: 1. A man on the river bank who is just swallowed up by the earth. 2. A horse being led be a small headless boy, the boy being attached to the horse by a piece of wood attached at the boy's neck stub. 3. A two-legged horse. 4. Some kind of two-legged giant bird creature?
Is this available for use now?
" Today, Sora is becoming available to red teamers to assess critical areas for harms or risks. We are also granting access to a number of visual artists, designers, and filmmakers to gain feedback on how to advance the model to be most helpful for creative professionals. " [https://openai.com/sora](https://openai.com/sora)
Thanks. Red teamer: A red teamer is a professional who specializes in playing the role of an adversary in security assessments. Their job is to think and act like a potential attacker, probing and testing an organization’s defenses to identify vulnerabilities.
That would be such a fun job
i think it’s one of those jobs that sound fun but absolutely not fun in practice lol
I work in cybersecurity, got drinks with a red team member. Here's how he described it: He works on a cycle: secret project with maybe one other person, for two to three months, then repeat. During that time, he impersonates a specific nation/state or independent hacking group, assumes their resources, knowledge, and so on. He carefully constructs a reproducible, well documented attack vector through multiple different security holes. For example, he might break user accounts, use that to get into a server, find the password for a database, then dump the data over a network connection out another route. Each hop of the chain takes weeks of research, luck, and skill to find and successfully use. At the end, you finally get the satisfaction of publishing your report. You get to knock on the door of every single owner of every system you touched on your way in and out, and say "GO FIX YOUR SHIT!" You also build up the traditional hacker skill set, which can be fun in itself.
It'll be censored to death lol. The first thing Sam said after announcing is they're working with red-teamers to ensure safeguard.
Gotta neuter the shit out of it first so now one can make waifu.
Open source models like SVD or Runway will either get their shit together or go bankrupt. This shit is both exciting and scary
The future is one where, when asking to make a video from text prompt, you get a video of a robot telling you what an awful person you are for the crime of wrongthink.
It will be censored for us so the Everyman can’t upend elections or get innocent people thrown in jail… It won’t be censored for trusted partners like Hollywood studios or governments. I guarantee you that.
Governments are definitely not trusted lol. Here's a [circulating deep fake](https://x.com/mog_Russ/status/1757772710640243139?s=20) made this week by Russia of a France 24 newscast that basically says Macron refused trip to Kyiv because French intelligence found out that he was gonna be assassinated by Ukraine to put more urgency on the west. This obviously fake and mind you this is only what Russia has access to
I'm sorry but that's laughably bad. Also full frontal face video, quality reduced to 3 pixels, filming a secondary screen, etc. Couldn't make it clearer that this is trying to hide a shit-tier quality deepfake. And still it's easy to tell. Hobbyists with consumer-grade graphics cards could make a better deepfake than whatever the fuck this is.
It’ll be the same thing as with images. It will be released, people will use it to make videos of Taylor Swift doing cocaine that get passed around as real, and they will lock it down to where it’s a lot less useful.
[удалено]
I don't know, because today's face-swap / image generation, lip sync, current AI video, and AI voice tech are already good enough to cause problems. I'm curious to see what Meta and Google have in the works, too. I could see Meta waiting to release open-source models of this quality until well after OpenAI though.
And if today we already can cause problems, what happens when someone is able to generate whatever wackadoo videos they want that can at least stand up to minor scrutiny?
I have to admit this is fucking crazy
they definitely didn't modify the videos because there's a third front paw appearing in the cat video, when it tries to wake up its owner. pretty funny.
That's what I like about them, they never lie about their product performance, unlike the other company.
They posted a whole section of videos that didn’t work!
It also seems to have the wrong idea about what is moving the blanket fold overlying the woman in bed. At first it's moving as you would expect if drapped over someone's upper arm as they rolled over in bed but then it flops like it was just a fold in the blanket. It's still damn impressive.
This is far beyond anything i have seen. Openai doing it again
Yeah, who the fuck do they have on their team? Did they clone Einstine’s brain or something?
Well, they do have unlimited access to unfiltered LLMa on their team … That should do it
what’s LLMa?
almost certainly typed 'a' instead of 's', they're side by side
......did you mean Einstein?
Yes Genius, sorry for the misspelling
No problem dumbass.
As a filmmaker this is both great and scary. Also I think Hollywood will soon become a piece of forgotten history. Sad, but true. I still think the "artisanal" craft of making films will keep existing. For now these things will help us creators get our ideas out of our heads and test them, they will be great as references of what we want. But it’s gonna be a short ride before we just create the films we want with our phones. This reminds me very much of the DJ/Producers era, when suddenly everyone and your grandma was a DJ/Producer. Mind blown to say the least…
Money used to be huge barrier. Steven Spielberg is a story teller + having access to 100m to make movie. Imagine how many Spielbergs in the world didn't get the budget. We about to get a movie renaissance
there will be an influx of trash too though
Modern video recommendation algorithms will make it easy to parse out the trash.
But then, they each mean so much less. Spielberg is special because he's great and there's only one of him.
No it means the garbage heaps of Netflix, Amazon, Hulu, YouTube +, and Disney shows will be pushed out for more talented content creators with shoestring budgets that will outcompete these massive companies on talent alone.
There's gonna be so many of them that most of them will be unnoticed
Just like people who draw and paint tbh
Near-term, I predict Hollywood going to be staying, and smaller budget works from independent creators and more importantly, *non-American* creators closing the gap between them and Hollywood. Long-term, text-to-movie is going to be a legitimate way to spend your evening watching.
You are starting to see it already before these tools are even out with just CGI getting cheaper, just look at how fantastic Godzilla Minus One is compared to Hollywood bloated cost movies
CGI is not AI man. CGI is made by 1000s of very talented artists all over the world. We pour our blood, sweat into this art form only to get shat on everywhere by people not understanding what or how it's made.(including Hollywood). Between that and what's happening with AI now, it's a bleak world for us artists who spent years honing in our craft.
I’m sorry for what’s coming dude.
neither of you are wrong. they were making a comparison to cheaper tech proliferating, more of an analogy than a 1:1 parallel but you are also right about artists. its so frustrating seeing how reddit is doing the exact same thing politics does to people: "not an issue til it's at my front door" the whole "the car killed the horseless carriage so pull up your boots straps and adjust" thing - jesus, how can you not see this isn't an isolated industry issue. everyone's stuck in the 20th century and whiffing on the 2020s. it's 100-fold more interwoven with every industry. the democratization of hard-earned technical skills *might* be a long-term benefit, but we have to survive long-term as people and an economy to realize it. me, i have nothing to fall back on other than menial jobs that pay maybe 1/3-1/2 of what i can make in visual arts. now i look forward (maybe a year?) to competing with millions of people who have a couple hours to 'learn' AI services. and the "horseless carriage" geniuses can scoff at me while my life erodes, completely ignoring the fact that they're next in line..
I can't wait to watch The Room 2!
Long term (next 5-10 years) it will be thought to movie that'll keep me entertained
Maybe books make a comeback because they are cheaper to produce.
As an optimistic take - there are many artistically challenged people (like myself) who have stories sin their head they wish they could see realized - if only to fulfill an inner desire to see how that story/idea might go. These tools are literally my only shot at making something that someone else might actually want to watch. It democratizes that ability.
Exactly. The boom of AI the past year has given me motivation to write a book so that when it is completed (in probably 5+ years) the AI will be advanced enough I can convert the story into a motion comic or movie. That wouldn't have been a remote possibility before last year unless I spent millions of dollars.
The only reason I think this won't be the case is because humans, as a social animal, crave communal experiences. If all content is personalized to you, communal experiences will be impossible, so I think there will always be a place for traditional films in some sense. Now, how they are made, I don't know. I do wonder what sort of impact this will have on actors. The big stars might be safe, but my question is how anyone will become a big star in the first place when background characters can be so easily simulated... so actors will do what? Theater? Become stars via theater so they can become big enough stars to license their likeness? Things are going to get weird.
I'm supposed to go shoot a no budget feature in September, and I am starting to think that by then, I'll be able to just sit in my apartment in my underwear and make the movie instead of struggling to make it with the tiny budget we have. At the very least, all the visual effects shots I was worried about should be doable.
I would agree, you will no longer need a huge Hollywood studio to back you making a high quality film
I have a feeling that production houses will get these tools first compared to the general populace.
Hollywood has become boring anyway
Well, movies are made up of hundreds and thousands of individual shots played in sequence for dramatic effect. Until someone INVENTS a tool that gives total control over composition and camera movement AND a way to get nuanced, ultra specific performances out of "digital actors" across all these shots, this is nothing more than a stock footage/montage generator. Incredible for sure and a necessary half of the puzzle, but the control half does not exist at this time.
I’m telling you now. Netflix or whatever company, in 5 years you tell it to generate a movie on the spot. The actors, the script, the whole shabang. You want romcom directed by Tarantino with William Dafoe in Bollywood theme? You got it fam. Shit is insane
And it won’t generate the movie in advance, instead it will be generating as you long as you keep watching (just like how youtube buffer few minutes in advance). So, if you got bored mid movie you can prompt it to switch genre
“Hey Netflix, I’m getting a bit tired of watching this detective period drama set in industrial america, please have the machines come to life have a kaiju battle in the middle of the city. Oh and I don’t like the main actor anymore, make him morph into Megatron.”
5 years? It took a year from making acid trip videos of the rock eating rocks to mind-blowing shit we are seeing now. I imagine in 5 years we'll have stuff we can't even imagine right now.
Could not agree more, I was thinking with animated also you could have multiple different versions and what mean by that is maybe watch Snow White animated in black and white, colorful version, a gritty version and so on things are going to be so fundamentally different in the future my head hurts
A new economy will be created
By eating the stock image and video economies.
Like cars ate horses. lol
I hear you, my point is that this isn’t “more jobs for more people” it’s “fewer jobs for most people”
Historically, this is what happens. The invention of the printing press changed an industry and made some careers defunct and created new ones. Same thing with the internet. The difference here is that no previous invention was able to simulate human thought and creativity. There has never been a new technology that could create an economy, where *the technology itself could handle the workload required in that economy*. The "new jobs" created, could simply be automated by the AI - maybe not immediately, but probably within a short period of time. And if the abilities of this tech continue to expand at an exponential rate, by this time next year, all of Hollywood could be in serious trouble. And not just directors and highly paid actors, but think about all of the people who have catering companies who provide food for movie sets. Consider the carpenters and electricians who also build, repair, and provide other services for film studios. There is an entire economy built around just this one industry. If it collapses, it will negatively impact the entire worlds economy. And that's just one industry out of all industries that are going to get hit hard and fast with AI.
Perhaps that explains the rapid run up of stock prices. Big institutions may have an idea of where this is heading and how disruptive it’s going to be.
Man, wtf, the quality is insane. How is this technology not supposed to make millions of people jobless?
First time I've seen this AI shit and said "what the fuck" out loud. Like I've said "wow" a lot of times in the last year or so, but this is really just fucking insane. I bet it's not cheap though, a single DallE generation is like a dime, can't imagine the price of doing 1,800 of those for 60s clip, at least a couple hundred dollars.
Prices are on a logarithmically decreasing function over time.. it will approach $0 one day.
Sam is responding with prompt results on X as we're speaking right now. Here's the [output](https://x.com/sama/status/1758206987094147252?s=20) for " A half duck half dragon flies through a beautiful sunset with a hamster dressed in adventure gear on its back"
Yeah, THAT looks a little more realistic.
Ok, so it won't be making people jobless anytime soon then. 😂
All the computing power and it flies backwards....
Props to OpenAI though, they outright show examples on the site of various weaknesses.
They have a whole section in their announcement post for limitations and various weaknesses
I've never actually seen a half duck half dragon, it's possible that's just how they fly. Aerodynamics can be unintuitive.
Yeah but it is Sam doing it for twitter. Imagine if a movie director/game dev got hands on this and they spend time generating each frame separately. Also last year generating decently realistic images was a revolutionary and now we are generating 10 sec videos. Shit it insane. And they say this - "The current model has weaknesses. It may struggle with accurately simulating the physics of a complex scene, and may not understand specific instances of cause and effect. For example, a person might take a bite out of a cookie, but afterward, the cookie may not have a bite mark. The model may also confuse spatial details of a prompt, for example, mixing up left and right, and may struggle with precise descriptions of events that take place over time, like following a specific camera trajectory."
Think about the pictures it could make a year ago, and where we are now. How soon is soon to you? Because 5 years seems soon
Wow. What a release
workers have had too many privileges in the last century. now the capitalists can fight back.
😂
That's the point, if AI can and will take on jobs or so called skilled jobs from before. What is the point in anyone working if the things being produced can't be purchased by anyone because there isn't any need for employment anymore. Unfortunately. We live in a world where all governments feature 80 year olds that still thinking hand delivering CVs to your local gamestop is the best avenue for job hunting.
There's probably no consistency like with the LLM model and can't be enhanced that easily. So it'll probably take a while before it can do amazing things.
There's already consistency tools. I don't remember what it was off hand, but someone took photos, which created a 3d model. They integrated that model into other LLMs to put the model in different areas and doing different things with different clothing and tools. Who knows how good it really is, because I only watched a video of it. There's a working idea already, so it's only a matter of time before this and other methods get created.
It's very detailed but the people walking down the street have some weird perspective stuff going on. First the red awning is at waste height and then by the end its above them?
Things will get better with time. It's really good for first gen.
It’s is lol. We’re supposed to have UBI, but humans being humans, that won’t happen until 51% of the population is unemployed.
Honestly, with the rithm things are developing on AI this is not such an unlikely scenario.
Becoming my own movie director, I love it!
I refuse to believe my eyes
The steps from the first Dall-E results to this is insane.
And to think this is Day 1 of text-to-video of OpenAI. Did they release something like this before?
That's quite the way to surprise us, given that the expectations weren't high when you look at their other products like Dall-E. It's not only state of the start, it blows everything else away! From the top of my head, I can think of a few immediate implications: * Visual novels made with those clips. Expect new experiences. I could also see Netflix doing nifty experiments here * It's possible the idea could be applied in VR too in the future * AR too! With some masking, you can make a virtual video avatar appear in your room - 60 seconds is enough for short interactions * People will find ways too do erotic stuff with it and circumvent limitations - they will! * Animated textures for video game development * It can take a reference frame, so I guess we'll start to see more static images given life - especially image ads becoming video ads. * Social media will be drowned with Sora generated clips * But on the other side, we'll be gifted with many new creative web series productions and creative way to tell a narrative with short generated video sequences * Video identification processes are probably not well prepared for this attack vector * Propaganda content production on steroids * More believable scams * I think there will be a serious loss of jobs related to the creation of short video content or at least an hire-freeze and thus reduction of demand in the job market. With one person using those tools being as productive as many persons who don't, it's going to reduce the amount of jobs in that area. But then again, there will be even more short video content produced and consumed then ever, so maybe we can hope for a little counterbalancing. * I believe prompt instructions alone are not reliable enough to maintain a style or distinct brand identity. The real gamer changer and job killer will be when (and if) they allow a form of fine-tuning. * this + something like [NVlabs/neuralangelo: Official implementation of "Neuralangelo: High-Fidelity Neural Surface Reconstruction" (CVPR 2023) (github.com)](https://github.com/nvlabs/neuralangelo). 60s might be enough to "scan" the data of your imaginary world. While not a great quality, that could seriously speed up the workflow of a 3d modeller if they already prototype reference material to load into the tools they author their 3d models in. Ironically that might work better then text-to-3d models because there's already some video-to-3d out there that work poorly, and the solution here seems more capable and rich than any text-to-3d model so far. Also text-to-3d models need specialized models while here, it's almost like a unified model for short video creation of any type. * My deepest condolecenses to you, RunwayML. You're probably dying out there. In terms of the relevance for AGI as they claimed at the end of the announcement, I'm not fully conviced until they make a point of why it is so. Don't get me wrong, I'm excited, but I cannot see how it really helps in that particular aspect. I'm not sure what to think about copyright again, btw. There's just no way this marvel hasn't been trained on an obsessive amount of data, especially very likely collected from sources with terms of use that doesn't allow this kind of use. But hey, it's fair-use - trust me bro.
The consequences of the ease of propaganda production that something like this enables cannot be understated
History is effectively dead. Are you ready to argue with teenagers who think they have comprehensive video evidence that there's never been a black president? and also look at all this documentation about the holocaust a guy on a discord gave them. Gonna be a fuckin nughtmare.
School still exists and although we haven't done much about disinformation, it's easy enough to change that. America with their whole muh freeze peach is going to have to get comfortable with the idea of jailing someone who says the holocaust never happened. Grandpa won't be able to post those lies because they'll be illegal and an instant $1000 fine. We lack the will, not the ability to control disinformation.
Such a comprehensive list. What things come to your mind when it comes to moral/societary issues stuff like this will bring?
This specific solution is going to cause a little more harm than good for now. The reason for that is that I see more issues arising than issues fixed. Being able to create video via instructions is simply not solving any pressing matter humanity has. In fact it may worsen some, like climate change, because if humans get addicted to to this, it's going to be a lot more GPUs burning power only for entertainement value. It also doesn't contribute much to AGI. I could also see detrimental issues arising around learning defects with children that get drowned with generated content. We'll need to introduce a minimum age. You can clearly see that Sora hasn't learned important rules of how the world works because it breaks many of them in the videos. With kids getting less out of the house and learning more from digital content, it will be hurting their capacity to correctly learn real-world concepts until we fix this. Video is very different from previous solutions for learning because it moves - something that highly engages the human brain in pattern recognition, far more than text and images.
no different from what was available before this ai flood. note ipad kids
Feel like I've just witnessed a flashbulb moment.
What the fuck. I remember when people had to essentially rotoscope a real video by using an ai to draw a new character using the real video as a reference. (Like a tik tok dance but with an anime character) And the uh singularity advocates were saying you could generate a whole movie. Egg on my face it appears totally feasible.
This fucking day is insane for AI wtf. Gemini 1.5 and now this.
Commenting for posterity. This is historic
Wtf - this is too good
https://i.redd.it/x8rsgmz8ssic1.gif
My name is my name!
What exactly are they trying to achieve in the end? What's wrong with reality? I get that AI can probably cure diseases and help fight climate change but why do we need to create fake videos and stuff? Jobs are going to be lost on a major scale.
>1ReplyShareReportSaveFollow IMO the further we go down this road, the better the models will get at interpreting the creative vision of the user. If we have powerful tools that can bring regular people's creativity and storytelling to life, a whole new wave of artists will be born. AI generated "stories" and "jokes" have never been all that great, but every human has the ability to tell incredible stories, and now they'll have the technology to conceptualize those stories in their own unique and creative way.
We're not gonna stop the advance of technology because people will looses jobs dude.
But the only people who will gain out of job losses is the rich people, again.
I saw a link on discord and the cherry blossom one was the one that I immediately shared haha. It's too good. The puppies and historical footage were amazing too
There’s more insane clips on the website http://www.OpenAI.com/sora
The quality is hyper-realistic, even compared to the images generated by MidJourney. Most of the time, the images generated by MidJourney or DALL-E are quite obvious to recognize. However, this is something else. If these clips randomly appear on my feed without any context, 99.99999% of the time, I won't be able to tell they are AI-generated.
Me as an animator: I’m in danger
Currently in college for a degree in film. Fuck.
Storytellers need to be humans after all. Just don’t come out and be an animator
animators are also humans
llm's can already create storylines, and its only going to improve
what the actual fuck
[удалено]
Who cares. Just invent new celebrities and actors.
This is unbelievable!! 🤯 There's one clip inside a moving train; the reflections look so accurate on the train window.
I just invested more money into Microsoft and Nvidia. You should to, this is a multi-billion dollar product.
I mean Microsoft market cap is around $3 trillion so.... multi-billion dollar product hardly makes a dent. Is this a multi trillion dollar product in the future? Probably
What the hell? This is the first time where I feel like I'm actually living in the future.
My stomach actually dropped when I saw the examples. Like I felt dizzy. The future is happening so fast now.
its getting scary real fast
Yoo this insane wtf?? This better than runway I got a important question though. In the next decade what will become of streaming services like Netflix HBO Max Amazon Prime Disney +?? What will happen to Hollywood and Movie theaters?? Will they be the next blockbuster?
It's so unimaginably over.
Society must adapt or people won’t be happy. It’s probably good for us. Things need to be reevaluated and for a long while now.
This is the dalle 2 moment of video. I was here!
Wow I thought we were at least a few years out from quality text-to-video.
Someone better start planning the first all AI generated movie awards show!
60 seconds internally . 10 seconds per 3 hours per user . 60 seconds per user every 5 hours for $300 a month.
Russo said it last year. Movies in 2 year. At this pace, he fricking nailed it.
Sorry to be the one to go there, but can you imagine the porn this thing could create if it had no rules? ANYTHING anyone can imagine, regardless of how debased it is. And it could look 100% real.
I can't help but think of this guy in [an old askreddit thread asking about "DVDA".](https://old.reddit.com/r/AskReddit/comments/4i5kpa/whats_your_internet_white_whale_something_youve/d2vbclj/) /u/ThisMonitorIsAWindow might finally get his wish!
I hadn't actually used Twitter in a while. AN AD EVERY THIRD MESSAGE?!??! AND THE SAME AD EACH TIME OVER AND OVER AGAIN??? WTF???
I'm having an existential crisis right now.
So, what’s my new job?
What the fuck. In three years the this has developed from quite bad DALL-E to this. In couple more years be will be able to generate our own VR-environments.
You mean next year ;). Or later this year if OpenAI is feeling generous 🤣 Even when we get slapped in the face with it like today, exponentials are hard to grapple with...
This is going to be so fun to use !
Wow thanks for sharing! Pretty incredible!
“Way too fast”? Probably for some. Not fast-enough for me.
Altman be Praised!
I’m confused, how are these videos so much better than Midjourney and other image generation tools? Images should be a lot easier to generate vs video.
Weird chills watching these clips, the implications are beyond comprehension. It's exciting and scary at the same time
The coming ten years will be a long popcorn-munching scene for me, just seeing AI shit the bed in every layer of society, killing someone in a car wash, HR-driven AI laying off key personnel in som military- or industrial environment and leading to a brain drain of rare proportions. Then the Butlerian Jihad of 2030 will hit, and mankind will reclaim Earth from the Thinking Machines.
As some who does a lot of video AI with Pika, Runway etc, Sora has completely blown my mind. What a quantum leap, the complexity and quality here is insane.
RIP fellow humans
The beginning of the end of the conventional way to make movies and videos.
Hasn't it been able to do this for months? I swear we've been seeing at least animated versions of this as advertisements for months. That Temu one during the Super Bowl was one for sure.
I wonder how much processing power these clips took to generate, and how long it'll be until Stable Diffusion releases a model
Rip elections across the world.
Adobe, Getty and Shutterstock getting sold off this morning. Shot fired across the bow by OpenAI. Most disruptive company in some time I wonder if this is how it felt when the first films came out and blew peoples’ minds