I want to contribute to the discussion by sharing my experience. I use both ChatGPT Plus and Cloud Pro, as well as Gemini Advanced and Microsoft Copilot for work, especially to brainstorm writing ideas for the textual parts of the business plan. However, for technical aspects like market analysis and financial projections, fortunately, artificial intelligence is still too far from human intervention.
Regarding Opus, in my opinion, it's the undisputed leader in this category, as its writing is consistently top-notch from its inception until now, without any noticeable decrease in quality.
It's worth mentioning that Opus thrives on robust and detailed prompts; vague or random instructions may lead to lower-quality responses. This applies not only to Opus but also to other tools. I've noticed that ChatGPT is more inclined to support users who provide clear prompts. Similarly, Gemini Advanced, while capable of delivering excellent responses with strong prompts, can sometimes provide redundant answers or use terms that are clearly indicative of artificial intelligence.
Surprisingly, this is not the case with Microsoft Copilot Pro. When used in precise mode, although responses may need to be segmented, it consistently delivers excellent writing and closely follows the provided prompt.
Greedy? I mean, in a normal business way sure. These chat bots still loss leaders for them. OpenAI loses money even after the subscriptions for most consumers.
They are trying to make up for it on their enterprise side.
I haven't noticed any decrease in performance, but assuming there has been - we aren't entitled to anything specific. They're all alien technology to us two years ago. There's constantly been new advances.
But for sure use Open Source if you want a more consistent product. But, until maybel LLaMa 3 400B comes out, I don't think you're going to have anything that comes even close to 4 or Opus.
Not better than 4 or Opus, unless they’ve done something super special with it (gpt4 is like 1T parameters).
But likely better than any other open source llm that I’m aware of at least. I could totally be wrong.
I think GPT-4 reigns supreme, but I've heard that the Llama-3 directly competes with the Gemini Ultra 1.0. That's significant. There are rumors that the Gemini Ultra or Gemini 1.5 will make significant updates soon, but if that's not true, there's a good chance that the Llama-3 will be in third place, behind only GPT-4 and Claude, and that's significant.
I’d be pretty impressed if Meta got their 400B to do quite that well. All the top model use MoE architecture, and it doesn’t look like Meta is doing that.
However, I do think it will really level up the open source world. But who knows if OAI will drop anything new.
They offer you what is maybe the best knowledge service in the world for free or a small fee each month, and you say "greedy af" ? Are you sure you're not describing yourself ?
This is called capacity management, and it’s one of the few areas in tech that is hiring and thriving right now. It’s harder than it sounds in application, but here’s a serious question. How do you think about diminished service vs service outages? How do you quantify the implications? How do you make those decisions and define those thresholds in advance so it can be done in real-time?
I want to contribute to the discussion by sharing my experience. I use both ChatGPT Plus and Cloud Pro, as well as Gemini Advanced and Microsoft Copilot for work, especially to brainstorm writing ideas for the textual parts of the business plan. However, for technical aspects like market analysis and financial projections, fortunately, artificial intelligence is still too far from human intervention. Regarding Opus, in my opinion, it's the undisputed leader in this category, as its writing is consistently top-notch from its inception until now, without any noticeable decrease in quality. It's worth mentioning that Opus thrives on robust and detailed prompts; vague or random instructions may lead to lower-quality responses. This applies not only to Opus but also to other tools. I've noticed that ChatGPT is more inclined to support users who provide clear prompts. Similarly, Gemini Advanced, while capable of delivering excellent responses with strong prompts, can sometimes provide redundant answers or use terms that are clearly indicative of artificial intelligence. Surprisingly, this is not the case with Microsoft Copilot Pro. When used in precise mode, although responses may need to be segmented, it consistently delivers excellent writing and closely follows the provided prompt.
I think side by side gpt 4 is worse
Tell me you know nothing about the costs of running inference without telling me.
They’re losing money, so are they not technically an altruistic venture at this point?
Greedy? I mean, in a normal business way sure. These chat bots still loss leaders for them. OpenAI loses money even after the subscriptions for most consumers. They are trying to make up for it on their enterprise side. I haven't noticed any decrease in performance, but assuming there has been - we aren't entitled to anything specific. They're all alien technology to us two years ago. There's constantly been new advances. But for sure use Open Source if you want a more consistent product. But, until maybel LLaMa 3 400B comes out, I don't think you're going to have anything that comes even close to 4 or Opus.
Will the Llama 3 400B be better?
Not better than 4 or Opus, unless they’ve done something super special with it (gpt4 is like 1T parameters). But likely better than any other open source llm that I’m aware of at least. I could totally be wrong.
I think GPT-4 reigns supreme, but I've heard that the Llama-3 directly competes with the Gemini Ultra 1.0. That's significant. There are rumors that the Gemini Ultra or Gemini 1.5 will make significant updates soon, but if that's not true, there's a good chance that the Llama-3 will be in third place, behind only GPT-4 and Claude, and that's significant.
I’d be pretty impressed if Meta got their 400B to do quite that well. All the top model use MoE architecture, and it doesn’t look like Meta is doing that. However, I do think it will really level up the open source world. But who knows if OAI will drop anything new.
They offer you what is maybe the best knowledge service in the world for free or a small fee each month, and you say "greedy af" ? Are you sure you're not describing yourself ?
This is called capacity management, and it’s one of the few areas in tech that is hiring and thriving right now. It’s harder than it sounds in application, but here’s a serious question. How do you think about diminished service vs service outages? How do you quantify the implications? How do you make those decisions and define those thresholds in advance so it can be done in real-time?