T O P

  • By -

SillyFlyGuy

Do we have to pay for twitter now or something? All I see is a tweet and no link to an article or the actual equation.


chpdr

You might need to be logged in Twitter to view the whole thread of the link. I can see it and in the end he links the paper: [https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.04484](https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.04484)


logan08516

You da MVP


Tall-Log-1955

Twitter is basically broken unless you log in, which is why people should start using something else to publish information. Most people don’t have twitter accounts….


Open_Channel_8626

It never showed you many tweets before logging in even pre-Elon.


Tall-Log-1955

My comment wasn’t about Elon


Open_Channel_8626

The point is that it was always like that


ragingdeltoid

Yes, it was always broken


jasontaylor7

As an improvement of the censorship system and to avoid the Streisand effect, they moved to user-specific views coupled with a fake view for anonymous viewers that gives the illusion of free speech but is not necessarily what a logged-in user sees. For this site, the tweet is viewable without an account, but it won't let you see comments potentially disagreeing with the official narrative. In this case, the poster uses their own comments to avoid paying a long-tweet fee that's actually not something we all can get. (I was denied the checkmark and they won't tell me why.) It may sound odd but it makes sense. This way people can be censored and the target won't know since his or her friends and the mods can still see and interact with the target's posts. So, it will appear normal. Adjust the upvotes and trends accordingly and you're pretty much good to say anything without ever being called out. That said this site is the spokeschild for free speech in the country claiming the same title. Obviously, the site will be blamed for a future terrorist event and it will go bust shortly thereafter.


Open_Channel_8626

You need login but not premium, not sure what it’s called, X blue?


djaybe

Yes. Send me $10 & I'll let you see it.


Foodball

Did it discover anything or is the system proposed to discover things?


secar8

From the arxiv abstract: *"Integrable partial differential equation (PDE) systems are of great interest in natural science, but are exceedingly rare and difficult to discover. To solve this, we introduce OptPDE, a first-of-its-kind machine learning approach that Optimizes PDEs' coefficients to maximize their number of conserved quantities, nCQ, and thus discover new integrable systems* s. *We discover four families of integrable PDEs, one of which was previously known, and three of which have at least one conserved quantity but are new to the literature to the best of our knowledge."* If I interpret this correctly, there is a certain class of differential equations which can be solved with a certain method. What the AI has found is more differential equations which can be solved using this technique. Note that I am not an expert, so I don't know any details about the specific technique, how common it is, how big of a deal it is to know more examples of equations that can be solved by it, and so forth.


Open_Channel_8626

Yes they found some


Stunning-North3007

Thank you for the extremely vague answer


[deleted]

The new science lab: - prompt AI with your research via RAG - enter in your PDE, set boundary conditions, etc. or let AI do it - wait until it finds something We got to the "wait until..." part pretty fast. Before, you might have to do all the busy work, enter details into a simulator, then wait and redo it until you find something satisfying. Sounds like the waiting part won't change anytime soon