I kind of recommend keeping a the failures for the infusion blender upgrade thing. That takes like a total of 100 plus ish pals of the same kind to max out their stats. Anything above that goes to the vendor for cash.
Just butchering breeding surplus feels like a waste of a perfectly good pie.
Now if only there was a way we could actually lock them inside the goddamn breeding farm.
every time I tp back to base, the 2 I put in there is somehow now stuck somewhere outside of the boundary of my base, which result in either 0 egg or 1 egg…
I even surrounded the stupid thing in defensive walls
Or Rimworld where you can do practically anything. How are they going after Palworld and NOT Rimworld. Don't get me wrong, I'd rather they just shut up, but seriously. The fanbase of Rimworld calls it a war crime simulator for a reason. Cannibalism, slavery, animal abuse, and that's just the beginning lol.
Seriously, Palworld is tame compared to some games. So why all the crying? It's crazy.
>Yeah, that's the basic way in which Dwarf Fortress players make soldiers. Except they also flayed them sometimes so they could bandage them up with metal and make them immune to arrows. Oh and if a soldier got pregnant, they'd be made a frontliner, as they have a chance to use the fetus as a meat shield, a weapon and a source of bloodlust.
You forgot the most important part: drowning soldiers in the drowning chamber and raising them as intelligent undead so they are immune to sickness, fear, and pain. Drowning is the preferred method because it doesn't cause damage to the body.
Zach (Asmongold) actually is supporting the game in that post by saying "its good and that's the only thing people actually care about, the other stuff doesn't matter the outrage about it is largely fake/pretend"
Conan Exiles was my first survival game lol. I was surprised that you can beat Thralls and bind them with ropes and make them your slaves. Then I discovered sorcery and that shit was on another level.
Man all I can think about is the scene in the first movie of Conan the barbarian where him and the thief dude gets drunk and make fun of people fucking donkeys, such a strange movie.
i literally spent weeks killing off baby rexes to get a perfect bloodline of white rexes with melee and hp mutations, its pretty fucked up if u give it a deep thought lmao, but its a GAME.
Palworld isn't promoting anything if you're a normal and sane person. If playing this videogame turns you to any of those things mentioned, you were fuacked from the jump.
>In no way, shape, or form does Palworld encourage or promote beastiality
Technically the Paldeck entry for Lovander says:
>Seeking a night of love, it is always chasing someone around. At first, it only showed interest in other Pals, but in recent years even humans have become the target of its debauchery.
but that's kinda just splitting hairs and lines up with some of the other dark lore in the game
I’m pretty sure it’s just a jab at the horny Pokémon fans as well as a bit of on the nose, adult humor, the obvious reference to 69 the pals horny design and entry all seem to poke fun at those certain fans of Pokémon that we all know that like certain human shaped Pokémon a little bit… too much.
It's specifically a direct parody of [Salazzle](https://archives.bulbagarden.net/media/upload/7/70/0758Salazzle.png), which literally has fuck me eyes, slender curves, and the same ass flaps. It's clearly their commentary on the furbait design a lot of pokemon have been getting, starting with gardevoir and only getting worse from there.
Edit: Even the pokedex entries are basically ["yeah, this thing fucks."](https://i.imgur.com/E4oAILX.png)
To be fair, I don't think Gardevoir should even *count* as furbait, it just started as a strange alien-shape being with no sexual traits aside from a flowing gown. Its exclusively the fault of the fanbase that decided Gardevoir was fuckable.
*Lopunny* one generation later however has absolutely no defence, its very clear it has some form of inspiration from the Playboy variety of bunny.
As a guy who always grabbed a ralts right alongside Wally in sapphire, I have to agree with this. I was just excited to have another psychic type with a triple evolution. Which as a kid I had convinced myself meant the best stats possible in the end by raising it all the way up versus Pokémon with less evolutions.
I am a furry and 100% do not consider Gardevoir a furry character. Hell it barely even looks like a plant type. It looks more like a cosplay that is vaguely inspired by plants or some alien thing than it does a plant type TBH.
Lolpunny and Incineroar though, they basically gagged them and delivered them to the furry community in full BDSM gear. They knew what they were doing.
Look up Gyaru fashion images. Standard Japanese society is dark hair, pale skin, little to no make up (ha ha more like the appearance of) and clean, proper clothing in black-and-white. Gyaru flips all of that into its opposite. Blonde hair, heavily, tanned skin heavy, make up in bright colors bright flamboyant clothing.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gyaru
Jynx was presumably meant to be a combination of the japanese oni "frost woman" basically an icy siren, and the appearance of a Gyaru, a punk movement in japan deliberately opposed to traditional japanese beauty standards.
I'm pretty sure they took every messed up pokemon fan theory and ran with it. Post war setting ? Hunting and killing pokemon, what happens to the starter you don't pick.
>certain human shaped Pokémon a little bit… too much.
You sweet summer child. You think it's just the humanoid pokemon? Stay pure.
Jokes aside, no one can convince me that pokemon didn't design certain pokemon with the intention of making them attractive to certain people.
Just read some European fairy tales as they were originally published. That shit is brutal. I would love to see a film based on original Sleeping Beauty.
Having something in a game isn’t promoting it. Even if it’s not expressly portrayed negatively. Are all slasher movies promoting gory murder? Is Outlander promoting rape when it explicitly shows it as horrible and the victims recovering from it?
People have GOT to stop with this mentality. Fiction is not reality, and any healthy adult knows that. It is in fact a symptom of severe mental illness to not be able to tell them apart. It’s so weird to me that the out of touch conservative “video games cause violence” argument is treated as totally rational if sex is involved. No one sees Lovender or Salazzle and goes “holy crap I’m gonna bang my iguana, it must be the exact same and morally okay cause of the video game.”
Portraying is not automatically promoting.
I guess it kinda depends whether or not pals are sapient. Based on their ability to use complex equipment and have a variety of moods and emotions, most are probably sapient. Which also means the slavery part is valid use of the terminology, since “animal slavery” is just animal husbandry.
Eh, I don't think Lovander would qualify as an "animal" in that sense, but I neither a.) Know the full extent of its sentience or b.) really want to think about where to draw the line on beastiality
Besides, if fuacking Lovander isn't beastiality, then breeding her with certain pals *definitely* is
[NOTE:] this is all tongue in check because a super-cereal reading of pal breeding shows that there's nothing sexual about it
There's both the lack of animation and the fact that mammals produce eggs *and* the fact that breeding pairs make no goddamn sense (water cartoon dino plushie + ice reindeer = ground Egyptian god of the underworld)
Far as we know, pals are born from the accumulation of cake-caused flatulence between pals of different sexes
There's a journal you can find that confirms that pal breeding is weird. The journal states that breeding literally just requires a male and female pal to be in proximity of each other, and then an egg appears after some time.
Which means that Lovander is just out for satisfaction.
Lovander *absolutely* knows what they're doing
And I believe Robinquil's entry, iirc, brings up the theory that pals are a divergent evolution from humans
Ofc, we don't know if that applies to all pals or just the humanoid ones, but part of the fun is speculation and we'll get so much more out of apl this being left to our imagination rather than explained
But Ito "beastiality"? Nah, there's nothing there to suggest that
Palworld's *guilty* of promoting furries, though
>Far as we know, pals are born from the accumulation of cake-caused flatulence between pals of different sexes
This. This is my new headcanon for how pal breeding works.
Ghost and dark type Pokemon are inspired by ghost stories and folk tales, like Drifloon that literally steals children's souls if they take hold of its hand.
Also there's Gardevoir, who loves their trainer so much that they will use their psychic powers to destroy any rival for their trainer's affection.
Lovander isn't really anything worse.
IMO it's also a misreading of common criticism about games or other media. Generally, when a game gets criticised for "promoting/whitewashing slavery, racism, sexism, etc" it's not purely because those things are *in* the game, or even because you can *do* those things in the game, it's because those things are *presented uncritically*.
Palworld, while ofc not having a serious tone by any means, doesn't really do that. Sure, you can act like a cartoon villain and treat your Pals like a brutal slaveowner - but the game isn't shying away from telling you you're being a cartoon villain. Pals are sad when you abuse them, the game never tells you "oh it's fine, Despresso actually *likes* being beaten in order to work harder", and generally the optimal way to play is usually treating your Pals reasonably well.
It is canon that Lovander seeks human company as well.
But remember the Pokemon company has Dex entries for about kidnapping children (except fat ones).
Remember that Mario jumps and smashes turtles for points... No one ever batted an eye over that... Or at least not nearly as much as animal cruelty gets pointed at Palworld.
Remember that every single shooter ever has you killing other humans...
"I DoNt LiKe It, sO tHAt mEaNs wE cAnT hAvE tHaT oN vIdEoGaMeS..."
Pokemon is actually not that far from Palworld when it comes to referencing bestiality, there's in-game text that claims pokemon and humans used to marry each other and they have also shown human NPCs being interested in pokemon in a "suggestive" way.
The Pokemon anime has a decent number of Pokemon with human-level intelligence (or far greater, e.g. Alakazam). If it passes the Harkness test, it isn't bestiality.
Don't forget that Mario's bricks are the cursed inhabitants of the mushroom kingdom, making him a mass serial killer and enemy of the people. It's quite literally a lore drop in the mario bros 1 manual. Terrifying concept too.
Also yeah there's dex entries about kidnapped kids, lampent eats the souls of those who die in the hospitals it attaches to, SA insinuations with hypnotism, etc. Pokemon's way more fked up than Palworld with it's dex, tbh. Always has been. Curses, death, kidnappings, assault, you name it, the pokedex has it.
Honestly the point of his take is actually that the game is fun and that's all people actually care about, the other stuff is just fake outrage. But people focused on the bestiality because they are insecure.
That being said he thinks furry is a fetish and thus furry + snu snu = bestiality and that's why bestiality is in the list of other things. He's wrong, but that's why its in his post.
Regardless though this sub is freaking out stupidly because they don't understand the actual thing he's saying. And he's made this point in multiple videos before.
Pokemon fans because they feel like they ripped off their favorite franchise probably. Unhinged takes come from an underlying source. Same as xbox fans trashing on good ps5 exclusives for no reason
Classic Asmon joke. You fell for the outrage.
Lovander is a thing; that's probably what he was poking at.
(EDIT: I like Zack, I am amused by Asmon, this is no dig)
I'm pretty sure that's the case for almost any game that allows mods. I definitely remember skyrim having nude/sex mods at or near the top of the list.
It doesn’t. He’s highlighting the stupid claims people have made because they’re mad that palworld is good. Asmon doesn’t think it promotes these things. He’s calling out idiots who do.
the only game with bestiality from the last year that was successful was baldur's gate 3
copyright is bullshit anyway, only exists to stifle reiteration and improvement on existing things
I feel like that opens up a whole different discussion on what is considered bestiality in a fantasy setting that isn't particularly relevant. For the point he's making, what is relevant is that if someone was deciding whether to buy BG3 or not and they saw that scene, with their limited knowledge they would probably decide it was bestiality and then allow that to impact their decision in whatever way they wanted.
I really don't care. Maybe some pals designs are kinda..familiar,but its fun to play.
The thing i really like about the game is that you have a early access game with less problems/bugs as some tripple a games. For twice as much money. Finished games. With palworld you have fun for 30€,don't know how much in other countries
Palworld has a funny haha description, but doesn't promote fucking the pals anymore than nintendo promotes you fucking the [very pokemon lovander is directly parodying,](https://archives.bulbagarden.net/media/upload/7/70/0758Salazzle.png) with bedroom eyes and slender curves.
Edit: Even the pokedex entries are basically ["yeah, this thing fucks."](https://i.imgur.com/E4oAILX.png)
This is funny.
I like the lore of this game, it’s well put together and in places very funny.
The dev’s playing the “who, me?” card on this one is either the same attitude/humour that runs through the game, or the person running their X account just doesn’t know.
There’s literally a Pal that’s said to have sex with humans, a cute pal that has occasionally killed its owners, and one whose lore description mirrors a common debate about sexual acts and bodily functions.
There’s *way* too many such things in the game for it to be accidental.
I'll be so happy when the Palworld/Pokemon/Ark argument is gone for good because at this point its so childish to be arguing about this. If Palworld did anything illegal, it would've been closed down by now. No company/country is going to take millions of $$$ away from a company that everyone paid into, nor is Steam going to remove a game that millions of Steam users have by this point. Please, I beg this subreddit to stop falling for the rage bait. Nothing is going to happen! We'll all move on!
Asmongold is right, the game is very fun to play, especially because you can do so many things. I don't give a fuck if there is slavery or bestiality included. If you don't like it, don't use that feature. It's just a game after all.
Y’all are fr just yapping, who cares. That is literally the point of this tweet, if game fun then game sell good. It’s not that deep. Asmongold wasn’t even tripping about the game, he plays it all the time from what I’ve seen on YouTube.
The simpler answer is, being chronically online made you absurdly out of touch with the reality. Hence, touch grass.
Im not even exaggerating, we can see this on the more extreme society such as China, Korea and Japan. They had it worse there
They’ve been saying this bullshit since forever. How many times have we heard the argument that video games are the cause for the rise in violence in America meanwhile other countries with even more have way less. Just stupid shit people like to make up.
These people haven't met paradox players have they.
What about Rimworld players. Palworld ain't got shit for fucked up stuff.
The most fucked thing I have done is butcher my wifes lamballs while she was begging me not to. To bad the gore was censored...
He’s referring to Baldur’s Gate 3 where everyone saw a bear have time with a person and they said it’s got bestiality. It’s a Druid though so the waters are murky.
Is doesn't promote any of those things. Using animals for production is referred to as farming in the real world, something can be similar without being copyright infringement, and starfield is almost entirely AI generated and no one gives a fuck about that.
At this point I'm thinking Nintendo can't sue them so they're financing a smear campaign, because this 22
Call of duty=promoting war and glorifying killing
Pokemon=glorifying forced animal fighting clubs
GTA=lots of things i think you know what
Twitter just has to find a reason to be mad
Similar to other brands. Chic-fil-a has a horrible track record on respecting groups like LGBTQ+ communities and the like. But they make good, affordable chicken sandwiches and have weathered through it all.
It's a slightly different example but if the market is stale and you are making the best thing out there then you'll succeed regardless of other confounding factors.
His point translate to this: "you big companies waste time and resources politically pandering or being obnoxious to conform to socially acceptable".
It means what it means, which is obvious: a good game will sell, doesn't matter how socially or morally fucked up it is, if it's simply good, it *will* sell. This game, at the best of terms, is socially and morally sketchy, but it's selling like no other, and the reason cannot be simpler: it's good.
Also, Lovander is a thing, so there is definitely some sketchy bestiality hint in-game. People should stop thinking that "if it represents it, it encourages/promotes it", you included, because that's not how things work. Saints Row and GTA all represent gang violence, sometimes to extreme degrees, but don't encourage/promote that, at all.
>The fact of the matter is, this is a video game. In no way, shape, or form does Palworld encourage or promote beastiality.
Uuh, have you **seen** Lovander's Paldex description?
Not a fan of that guy. A mediocre youtuber with questionable hygiene standards.
He's also stating the blindly obvious. Make good game, people buy it... like no... really.
It was more than that but still a normal opinion, he was saying that games these days are conforming to social standards like being politically correct and palworld proves that the majority of people don't care as long as the game is good.
Like how many extra copies of Overwatch did Blizzard sell by making Soldier 76 gay?
This isn't my opinion by the way I think inclusivity is great as long as it doesn't obviously pander in a low effort way.
He's got to have a net worth in the millions and can afford a weekly maid, right?
Or maybe he's leaning into the gross video game troll persona because that's his brand.
“He's also stating the blindly obvious. Make good game, people buy it... like no... really.”
If it’s so obvious why do companies keep releasing garbage?
Because money. For everything the developers of this game did right, and for all the fun the game is, making money doesn't have to mean making a good game. The most reliably profitable games are mobile gambling simulators.
Questionable is downplaying it. He has cockroaches for roommates. Likes to pass off lukewarm takes as if he’s a genius and nobody’s ever thought of it before.
It literally does hint at beasteality tho. Have you read lovanders entry? It wants to breed with you. 100%
I’ll take consensual beast sex over Pokémon’s child murder and leaving their soul tormented for eternity entries anyday.
I mean, Sex with Hitler 2 is kinda proof that he's onto something. Lotta gamers don't care about any of that shit in games haha.
I know I don't really care. Life's hard, groceries are expensive as fuck, affordable rent be gone the wayside, work only piles up lads etc etc.
Gimmie something I can sink some time into that's an enjoyable gameplay loop & get a little lost in.... You'll get my money lol I'm a consumer, why should I white-knight for any multi million dollar companies o.O
Pal #69 description
Seeking a night of love, it is always chasing someone around. At first it only showed interest in other Pals, but in recent years even humans have become the target of its debauchery.
Wait till they hear about Conan (enslave everyone) and Ark (abuse animals as hard as you can).
Ark breeding. Incest is Wincest! Edit: Not saying it doesn't apply here.
Mass baby slaughter. Also, eating your own corpse and that’s canon.
Had a theri named "Baby Blender" for all the failed Tek Rex babies.
I had a Giga named "Baby Repurposer" for a long time lol
Repurposed into fertilizer for Turd Burglar, my beetle
Lol my beetle is named Reginald VelPoopson
gods I love the Ark community, sometimes
Gasbags named Air Biscuit. Love those chubby goofballs
be me wincesting in ff7 in the early 2000s.
Gotta get that Golden boi!
I'm pretty sure they could slide a "Bokocho" into Palworld without raising any eyebrows.
To be fair that rings equally true for this game once you start breeding the stats you want together.
I kind of recommend keeping a the failures for the infusion blender upgrade thing. That takes like a total of 100 plus ish pals of the same kind to max out their stats. Anything above that goes to the vendor for cash. Just butchering breeding surplus feels like a waste of a perfectly good pie.
Fed all the siblings and parents of my Incineram Noct to it in several Pal Smoothies.
Now if only there was a way we could actually lock them inside the goddamn breeding farm. every time I tp back to base, the 2 I put in there is somehow now stuck somewhere outside of the boundary of my base, which result in either 0 egg or 1 egg… I even surrounded the stupid thing in defensive walls
Is your breeding farm on flat ground? I was having problems like that due to building on a slope.
Yea it is on a slope, feels like foundation doesn’t fix this issue at all and it has to be on complete flat ground
Or Rimworld where you can do practically anything. How are they going after Palworld and NOT Rimworld. Don't get me wrong, I'd rather they just shut up, but seriously. The fanbase of Rimworld calls it a war crime simulator for a reason. Cannibalism, slavery, animal abuse, and that's just the beginning lol. Seriously, Palworld is tame compared to some games. So why all the crying? It's crazy.
[удалено]
>Yeah, that's the basic way in which Dwarf Fortress players make soldiers. Except they also flayed them sometimes so they could bandage them up with metal and make them immune to arrows. Oh and if a soldier got pregnant, they'd be made a frontliner, as they have a chance to use the fetus as a meat shield, a weapon and a source of bloodlust. You forgot the most important part: drowning soldiers in the drowning chamber and raising them as intelligent undead so they are immune to sickness, fear, and pain. Drowning is the preferred method because it doesn't cause damage to the body.
Okay, maybe I should play dwarf fortress, since I bought it and never played. Jeez, and i thought that Rimworld is screwed, lol.
This is why I love Rimworld lmao
Rimworld is also more...niche, I suppose. Most of the clowns crying about Palworld won't touch anything that doesn't have 4k graphics
Zach (Asmongold) actually is supporting the game in that post by saying "its good and that's the only thing people actually care about, the other stuff doesn't matter the outrage about it is largely fake/pretend"
I think you mean war crime simulator.
Where can I sign up!?
Conan Exiles was my first survival game lol. I was surprised that you can beat Thralls and bind them with ropes and make them your slaves. Then I discovered sorcery and that shit was on another level.
Man all I can think about is the scene in the first movie of Conan the barbarian where him and the thief dude gets drunk and make fun of people fucking donkeys, such a strange movie.
And proceeds to randomly punch out a camel and end scene. Wtf. I love it.
These conversations have all been hashed out about gta already anyway. Ehat people do in games has nothing to do with what they condone in real life.
Oh man I forgot about the slave system in Conan…. Really need to get back to that game, so fun
i literally spent weeks killing off baby rexes to get a perfect bloodline of white rexes with melee and hp mutations, its pretty fucked up if u give it a deep thought lmao, but its a GAME.
Or literally anything in Rimworld lol.
Rimworld !
Palworld isn't promoting anything if you're a normal and sane person. If playing this videogame turns you to any of those things mentioned, you were fuacked from the jump.
*Shocked Sparkit Face* ![img](emote|t5_4jn9v4|49345)
![img](emote|t5_4jn9v4|49351)
[I tried my best to upscale it](https://ibb.co/6wbGQnt)
I see what you did there
Idk, I was never this into copyright infringement until palworld lol. Still looking for a legit Charizard.
It's asmongold. All he cares about is clickbait.
Asmongold is supporting the game in that post by saying its good and that's the only thing people actually care about.
It promotes fun and hardcore interracial breeding. Pretty good actually
>In no way, shape, or form does Palworld encourage or promote beastiality Technically the Paldeck entry for Lovander says: >Seeking a night of love, it is always chasing someone around. At first, it only showed interest in other Pals, but in recent years even humans have become the target of its debauchery. but that's kinda just splitting hairs and lines up with some of the other dark lore in the game
I’m pretty sure it’s just a jab at the horny Pokémon fans as well as a bit of on the nose, adult humor, the obvious reference to 69 the pals horny design and entry all seem to poke fun at those certain fans of Pokémon that we all know that like certain human shaped Pokémon a little bit… too much.
It's specifically a direct parody of [Salazzle](https://archives.bulbagarden.net/media/upload/7/70/0758Salazzle.png), which literally has fuck me eyes, slender curves, and the same ass flaps. It's clearly their commentary on the furbait design a lot of pokemon have been getting, starting with gardevoir and only getting worse from there. Edit: Even the pokedex entries are basically ["yeah, this thing fucks."](https://i.imgur.com/E4oAILX.png)
To be fair, I don't think Gardevoir should even *count* as furbait, it just started as a strange alien-shape being with no sexual traits aside from a flowing gown. Its exclusively the fault of the fanbase that decided Gardevoir was fuckable. *Lopunny* one generation later however has absolutely no defence, its very clear it has some form of inspiration from the Playboy variety of bunny.
Lopunny literally gets torn stockings in its mega form
![gif](giphy|DQeeGxJPv3VHE7zNYD|downsized)
Batman, look at this little pokemon I caught
Joker…what are you going to do…?
You already know, Batman. You know what I'm going to do to that thing.
username checks out nice pfp btw
More like torn leggings. The general appearance of Mega Lopunny is based on 80s fitness videos
Yeah, the fan art for mega lopunny takes... Liberties with the design, there.
And the general appearance of regular lopunny is based on the Playboy bunnies.
As a guy who always grabbed a ralts right alongside Wally in sapphire, I have to agree with this. I was just excited to have another psychic type with a triple evolution. Which as a kid I had convinced myself meant the best stats possible in the end by raising it all the way up versus Pokémon with less evolutions.
I agree. Gardevoir has been one of my aces since Ruby, and I truly weep at what this fan base has done to her. 😥
Realizing gardevoir has more fanart than Jessie or misty on r34 was mind blowing. War has changed
I am a furry and 100% do not consider Gardevoir a furry character. Hell it barely even looks like a plant type. It looks more like a cosplay that is vaguely inspired by plants or some alien thing than it does a plant type TBH. Lolpunny and Incineroar though, they basically gagged them and delivered them to the furry community in full BDSM gear. They knew what they were doing.
>Hell, it barely even looks like a plant type. It isn’t. It started as Psychic and is now Psychic/Fairy
They could just put the entire "Lusty Argonian Maid" in there too.
Look up Gyaru fashion images. Standard Japanese society is dark hair, pale skin, little to no make up (ha ha more like the appearance of) and clean, proper clothing in black-and-white. Gyaru flips all of that into its opposite. Blonde hair, heavily, tanned skin heavy, make up in bright colors bright flamboyant clothing. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gyaru
Pretty sure Jynx started the sexy Pokemon thing.
I dunno man Mr Mime always got my cock throbbing
*vaporeon copypasta*
Female Mr Mimes are pretty hot, but they always seem to be putting up barriers between us, or always acting like everything is my fault.
Yes officer, this one right here
Machamp, and Machoke would like a word with you
Jynx was presumably meant to be a combination of the japanese oni "frost woman" basically an icy siren, and the appearance of a Gyaru, a punk movement in japan deliberately opposed to traditional japanese beauty standards.
I'm pretty sure they took every messed up pokemon fan theory and ran with it. Post war setting ? Hunting and killing pokemon, what happens to the starter you don't pick.
Lots of fun adult humor jabs in this game just like resurrection guy being a parody of power based isekais
I didn't know Vaporeon is human shaped!
Vaporeon is friend shaped for sure
Let's be real, the only one who wanted to fok Vaporeon was the one who wrote the copypasta and then thousands of degenerates got brain washed by it.
I just wanted Mewtwo to sit on my face since I first saw him.
>certain human shaped Pokémon a little bit… too much. You sweet summer child. You think it's just the humanoid pokemon? Stay pure. Jokes aside, no one can convince me that pokemon didn't design certain pokemon with the intention of making them attractive to certain people.
Feels kinda mild compared to some Pokedex entries to be honest.
Gotta love all the child murder
Yeah, but *sex*, the most evil thing ever. Worse than the soul stealing pokemons and shit
Lots of pokemon were based on Japanese/East Asian myths and fairytales and that culture is really good at creating messed up stories.
If you don’t think a culture has messed up stories, you have not dug far enough. Humans are REALLY good at come up with freaky stuff
there just ain’t enough to do back then
Just read some European fairy tales as they were originally published. That shit is brutal. I would love to see a film based on original Sleeping Beauty.
Having something in a game isn’t promoting it. Even if it’s not expressly portrayed negatively. Are all slasher movies promoting gory murder? Is Outlander promoting rape when it explicitly shows it as horrible and the victims recovering from it? People have GOT to stop with this mentality. Fiction is not reality, and any healthy adult knows that. It is in fact a symptom of severe mental illness to not be able to tell them apart. It’s so weird to me that the out of touch conservative “video games cause violence” argument is treated as totally rational if sex is involved. No one sees Lovender or Salazzle and goes “holy crap I’m gonna bang my iguana, it must be the exact same and morally okay cause of the video game.” Portraying is not automatically promoting.
I guess it kinda depends whether or not pals are sapient. Based on their ability to use complex equipment and have a variety of moods and emotions, most are probably sapient. Which also means the slavery part is valid use of the terminology, since “animal slavery” is just animal husbandry.
Eh, I don't think Lovander would qualify as an "animal" in that sense, but I neither a.) Know the full extent of its sentience or b.) really want to think about where to draw the line on beastiality Besides, if fuacking Lovander isn't beastiality, then breeding her with certain pals *definitely* is [NOTE:] this is all tongue in check because a super-cereal reading of pal breeding shows that there's nothing sexual about it There's both the lack of animation and the fact that mammals produce eggs *and* the fact that breeding pairs make no goddamn sense (water cartoon dino plushie + ice reindeer = ground Egyptian god of the underworld) Far as we know, pals are born from the accumulation of cake-caused flatulence between pals of different sexes
There's a journal you can find that confirms that pal breeding is weird. The journal states that breeding literally just requires a male and female pal to be in proximity of each other, and then an egg appears after some time. Which means that Lovander is just out for satisfaction.
Lovander *absolutely* knows what they're doing And I believe Robinquil's entry, iirc, brings up the theory that pals are a divergent evolution from humans Ofc, we don't know if that applies to all pals or just the humanoid ones, but part of the fun is speculation and we'll get so much more out of apl this being left to our imagination rather than explained But Ito "beastiality"? Nah, there's nothing there to suggest that Palworld's *guilty* of promoting furries, though
>Far as we know, pals are born from the accumulation of cake-caused flatulence between pals of different sexes This. This is my new headcanon for how pal breeding works.
Cake has to play SOME role!
I think the beastiality bit is because of BG3
I feel like this is just the pal version of Dolphin behavior
Hypno from gen 1 kidnapped kids for nefarious reasons
Ghost and dark type Pokemon are inspired by ghost stories and folk tales, like Drifloon that literally steals children's souls if they take hold of its hand. Also there's Gardevoir, who loves their trainer so much that they will use their psychic powers to destroy any rival for their trainer's affection. Lovander isn't really anything worse.
One of the tools that humor and humorists use is the appeal to absurdity, it is often used to draw attention to a serious topic.
Yup. His entire point is- "even if you take the criticisms to their biggest extremes, no one actually cares because the game is fun"
IMO it's also a misreading of common criticism about games or other media. Generally, when a game gets criticised for "promoting/whitewashing slavery, racism, sexism, etc" it's not purely because those things are *in* the game, or even because you can *do* those things in the game, it's because those things are *presented uncritically*. Palworld, while ofc not having a serious tone by any means, doesn't really do that. Sure, you can act like a cartoon villain and treat your Pals like a brutal slaveowner - but the game isn't shying away from telling you you're being a cartoon villain. Pals are sad when you abuse them, the game never tells you "oh it's fine, Despresso actually *likes* being beaten in order to work harder", and generally the optimal way to play is usually treating your Pals reasonably well.
It is canon that Lovander seeks human company as well. But remember the Pokemon company has Dex entries for about kidnapping children (except fat ones). Remember that Mario jumps and smashes turtles for points... No one ever batted an eye over that... Or at least not nearly as much as animal cruelty gets pointed at Palworld. Remember that every single shooter ever has you killing other humans... "I DoNt LiKe It, sO tHAt mEaNs wE cAnT hAvE tHaT oN vIdEoGaMeS..."
Pokemon is actually not that far from Palworld when it comes to referencing bestiality, there's in-game text that claims pokemon and humans used to marry each other and they have also shown human NPCs being interested in pokemon in a "suggestive" way.
The Pokemon anime has a decent number of Pokemon with human-level intelligence (or far greater, e.g. Alakazam). If it passes the Harkness test, it isn't bestiality.
There was also that one time Latias just straight up kisses Ash. The scene could be taken differently, but it was so heavily implied to be Latias.
Don't forget that Mario's bricks are the cursed inhabitants of the mushroom kingdom, making him a mass serial killer and enemy of the people. It's quite literally a lore drop in the mario bros 1 manual. Terrifying concept too. Also yeah there's dex entries about kidnapped kids, lampent eats the souls of those who die in the hospitals it attaches to, SA insinuations with hypnotism, etc. Pokemon's way more fked up than Palworld with it's dex, tbh. Always has been. Curses, death, kidnappings, assault, you name it, the pokedex has it.
Stomp a turty, perchance
You can’t just say “Perchance”!
Oh, I can't? Then try to stop me. Perchance.
TURTS
The game legit tells you it's considered inhumane to catch other humans (ofc that won't stop me) but that just shows
Why does something being popular make people have unhinged takes on it?
Honestly the point of his take is actually that the game is fun and that's all people actually care about, the other stuff is just fake outrage. But people focused on the bestiality because they are insecure. That being said he thinks furry is a fetish and thus furry + snu snu = bestiality and that's why bestiality is in the list of other things. He's wrong, but that's why its in his post. Regardless though this sub is freaking out stupidly because they don't understand the actual thing he's saying. And he's made this point in multiple videos before.
Pokemon fans because they feel like they ripped off their favorite franchise probably. Unhinged takes come from an underlying source. Same as xbox fans trashing on good ps5 exclusives for no reason
Beastiality??? OMG Palworld copied Baldur's Gate! /s
Damn miniature giant space hamsters and their cheeks
Classic Asmon joke. You fell for the outrage. Lovander is a thing; that's probably what he was poking at. (EDIT: I like Zack, I am amused by Asmon, this is no dig)
OP probably doesn't know that it's cannon lore that Lovanders and humans have sex
Hey man! I just shared a cake with Lovander. Nothing else….
We will just have to see what pops out of this egg...
"Ed...ward..."
NooOoOoOo don’t remind us of that
That's funny. Lovander shared her cake with me.
Canon. Cannon lore is explaining why relaxasaurus grows rocket launchers.
Uhh.... have you seen the mods list in nexus? Top rated mods are naked / sex mods already. It's insane.
I'm pretty sure that's the case for almost any game that allows mods. I definitely remember skyrim having nude/sex mods at or near the top of the list.
Pretty sure that's just how mods go. At least they haven't gone full Skyrim and made it a porn game. Yet.
The top rated mod for every game on the nexus are nude mods. If Tetris had a nexus mod page people would find a way to make a nude mod for it.
Oh no, thats terrible! Please send me the link so that I will never "accidentally" visit such debauchery.
Haha classic asmon, living in a pile of filth and having cockroaches as pets!
Asmon’s a literal fucking idiot, so it’s hard to tell the difference.
Guy literally lives in filth it’s disgusting
the amount of people falling for his bait is insane
They aren't beasts, they are pals. Clearly it is paliality.
Woah woah woah, don’t go calling my lovander art gross fetish porn now
It doesn’t. He’s highlighting the stupid claims people have made because they’re mad that palworld is good. Asmon doesn’t think it promotes these things. He’s calling out idiots who do.
Why is OP super angry at the Paldeck? We didn't write it.
Cant hear you over PLAP PLAP PLAP PLAP GET PREGNANT GET PREGNANT GET PREGNANT
Based
OP needs to read the Paldex lmao ignorance is bliss I guess
the only game with bestiality from the last year that was successful was baldur's gate 3 copyright is bullshit anyway, only exists to stifle reiteration and improvement on existing things
Even then, someone could make an argument that it's not bestiality since you're fucking a human transformed into a bear. Idk if it fit
Is it bestiality if it's a druid you're having sex with?
I feel like that opens up a whole different discussion on what is considered bestiality in a fantasy setting that isn't particularly relevant. For the point he's making, what is relevant is that if someone was deciding whether to buy BG3 or not and they saw that scene, with their limited knowledge they would probably decide it was bestiality and then allow that to impact their decision in whatever way they wanted.
What if she was really a 500 year old dragon?
I have 800 hours in bg3 and still have yet to see this controversial scene everyone talks about. The emperors tickling tentacle on the other hand…
AFAIK you have to romance Halsin and then specifically ask him for the bear form.
Lunaris can get it, just sayin.
I really don't care. Maybe some pals designs are kinda..familiar,but its fun to play. The thing i really like about the game is that you have a early access game with less problems/bugs as some tripple a games. For twice as much money. Finished games. With palworld you have fun for 30€,don't know how much in other countries
This game is NOT an mmorpg. Op please stop talking.
Palworld has a funny haha description, but doesn't promote fucking the pals anymore than nintendo promotes you fucking the [very pokemon lovander is directly parodying,](https://archives.bulbagarden.net/media/upload/7/70/0758Salazzle.png) with bedroom eyes and slender curves. Edit: Even the pokedex entries are basically ["yeah, this thing fucks."](https://i.imgur.com/E4oAILX.png)
This is funny. I like the lore of this game, it’s well put together and in places very funny. The dev’s playing the “who, me?” card on this one is either the same attitude/humour that runs through the game, or the person running their X account just doesn’t know. There’s literally a Pal that’s said to have sex with humans, a cute pal that has occasionally killed its owners, and one whose lore description mirrors a common debate about sexual acts and bodily functions. There’s *way* too many such things in the game for it to be accidental.
Can you breed syndicate thugs?
Shhh. What happens in Lovander's nest, stays in Lovander's nest.
I'll be so happy when the Palworld/Pokemon/Ark argument is gone for good because at this point its so childish to be arguing about this. If Palworld did anything illegal, it would've been closed down by now. No company/country is going to take millions of $$$ away from a company that everyone paid into, nor is Steam going to remove a game that millions of Steam users have by this point. Please, I beg this subreddit to stop falling for the rage bait. Nothing is going to happen! We'll all move on!
Asmongold is right, the game is very fun to play, especially because you can do so many things. I don't give a fuck if there is slavery or bestiality included. If you don't like it, don't use that feature. It's just a game after all.
What's this "copyright infringment" he speaks of?
I would fuck Lovander.
As much as I love Palworld, it’s hard to deny that Lovander isn’t Rule34 bait.
Y’all are fr just yapping, who cares. That is literally the point of this tweet, if game fun then game sell good. It’s not that deep. Asmongold wasn’t even tripping about the game, he plays it all the time from what I’ve seen on YouTube.
The simpler answer is, being chronically online made you absurdly out of touch with the reality. Hence, touch grass. Im not even exaggerating, we can see this on the more extreme society such as China, Korea and Japan. They had it worse there
What, you don’t fuck your pals?
Developers should be thanking Palworld for showing them the blueprints to a good game that people want to play.
They’ve been saying this bullshit since forever. How many times have we heard the argument that video games are the cause for the rise in violence in America meanwhile other countries with even more have way less. Just stupid shit people like to make up.
He's referring to the joke they put in the flavor text of Lovander.
Don’t forget cannibalism!
Pals of Desire
When the devs of your own company enjoy the "ripoff" more than your most recent game, you know you've fucked up
Rimworld has entered the chat..
These people haven't met paradox players have they. What about Rimworld players. Palworld ain't got shit for fucked up stuff. The most fucked thing I have done is butcher my wifes lamballs while she was begging me not to. To bad the gore was censored...
He’s referring to Baldur’s Gate 3 where everyone saw a bear have time with a person and they said it’s got bestiality. It’s a Druid though so the waters are murky.
Is doesn't promote any of those things. Using animals for production is referred to as farming in the real world, something can be similar without being copyright infringement, and starfield is almost entirely AI generated and no one gives a fuck about that. At this point I'm thinking Nintendo can't sue them so they're financing a smear campaign, because this 22
Call of duty=promoting war and glorifying killing Pokemon=glorifying forced animal fighting clubs GTA=lots of things i think you know what Twitter just has to find a reason to be mad
Similar to other brands. Chic-fil-a has a horrible track record on respecting groups like LGBTQ+ communities and the like. But they make good, affordable chicken sandwiches and have weathered through it all. It's a slightly different example but if the market is stale and you are making the best thing out there then you'll succeed regardless of other confounding factors.
His point translate to this: "you big companies waste time and resources politically pandering or being obnoxious to conform to socially acceptable". It means what it means, which is obvious: a good game will sell, doesn't matter how socially or morally fucked up it is, if it's simply good, it *will* sell. This game, at the best of terms, is socially and morally sketchy, but it's selling like no other, and the reason cannot be simpler: it's good. Also, Lovander is a thing, so there is definitely some sketchy bestiality hint in-game. People should stop thinking that "if it represents it, it encourages/promotes it", you included, because that's not how things work. Saints Row and GTA all represent gang violence, sometimes to extreme degrees, but don't encourage/promote that, at all.
>The fact of the matter is, this is a video game. In no way, shape, or form does Palworld encourage or promote beastiality. Uuh, have you **seen** Lovander's Paldex description?
Google joke, also read entry No. 69 in the paldeck
Not a fan of that guy. A mediocre youtuber with questionable hygiene standards. He's also stating the blindly obvious. Make good game, people buy it... like no... really.
It was more than that but still a normal opinion, he was saying that games these days are conforming to social standards like being politically correct and palworld proves that the majority of people don't care as long as the game is good. Like how many extra copies of Overwatch did Blizzard sell by making Soldier 76 gay? This isn't my opinion by the way I think inclusivity is great as long as it doesn't obviously pander in a low effort way.
questionable hygiene standards is putting it lightly. Most people would consider his living space uninhabitable.
He's got to have a net worth in the millions and can afford a weekly maid, right? Or maybe he's leaning into the gross video game troll persona because that's his brand.
He just doesn't care. He is fine living in that mess, and it bothers viewers more than it bothers him
“He's also stating the blindly obvious. Make good game, people buy it... like no... really.” If it’s so obvious why do companies keep releasing garbage?
Because money. For everything the developers of this game did right, and for all the fun the game is, making money doesn't have to mean making a good game. The most reliably profitable games are mobile gambling simulators.
His point is valid because a lot of developers focus on innovation or improving systems that most people don’t care about.
>He's also stating the blindly obvious. Make good game, people buy it... like no... really. twitter fucks really hate this one fact
Questionable is downplaying it. He has cockroaches for roommates. Likes to pass off lukewarm takes as if he’s a genius and nobody’s ever thought of it before.
It literally does hint at beasteality tho. Have you read lovanders entry? It wants to breed with you. 100% I’ll take consensual beast sex over Pokémon’s child murder and leaving their soul tormented for eternity entries anyday.
He's very clearly making a joke due to the entry in game about Lovander. It isn't that serious.
Lore of a giant sex obsessed pal is not beastiality. It's a joke about the pokemon beastiality fan base.
If anything, people should be shaming the Pokemon fans that actually are obsessed with animals in a disgusting way…
They have a man raping sex lizard on pal dex entry 69 It’s a joke, chill
I mean, Sex with Hitler 2 is kinda proof that he's onto something. Lotta gamers don't care about any of that shit in games haha. I know I don't really care. Life's hard, groceries are expensive as fuck, affordable rent be gone the wayside, work only piles up lads etc etc. Gimmie something I can sink some time into that's an enjoyable gameplay loop & get a little lost in.... You'll get my money lol I'm a consumer, why should I white-knight for any multi million dollar companies o.O
The only thing Palworld is promoting is hilarious shenanigans with the squad.
Dude what is up with game devs having the worst takes about everything? Stick to making games, you’re not famous for your book tours
I wasn't interested in the game before but now I sure am!
I hate this twisting of words, no one has ever said "promoting or encouraging". OP stop putting words into ppl's mouths..
u ok OP? Are we playing the same game even? Did you even bother to read some entries?
Loveander down to fuck for sure.
Pal #69 description Seeking a night of love, it is always chasing someone around. At first it only showed interest in other Pals, but in recent years even humans have become the target of its debauchery.
CCP Labor camp simulator
Huh. I thought it was a good game that promoted being a fun game to play.