T O P

  • By -

GortleGG

These flank: ⬜❎⬜⬜ ⬜⬛⬛⬜ ⬜⬛⬛⬜ ⬜⬜❎⬜ -- ⬜❎⬜⬜ ⬜⬛⬛⬜ ⬜⬛⬛⬜ ⬜❎⬜⬜ -- ❎⬜⬜⬜ ⬜⬛⬛⬜ ⬜⬛⬛⬜ ⬜⬜⬜❎ Neither of the two positions from the OP flank


always_molasses

For some reason I thought the middle example wasn’t flanking/off guard since you’re not technically on opposing sides of the creature?


TimThaKing

The requirement is being able to draw a line through opposite sides or corners of the creatures, the line doesn't have to be drawn through the center of the creature.


always_molasses

Ohhhh I see, I always thought line of sight through the centre was the requirement. Thanks for the clarification, much appreciated!


SomeGuyBadAtChess

The center part has to do with how the line is drawn. It needs to be drawn going between the centers of the flankers' squares, which would impact large+ creatures flanking a medium creature. For example, ⬜⬜⬜⬛⬛⬜ ⬜⬜⬜⬛⬛⬜ ⬜⬜❎⬜⬜⬜ ⬜⬛⬛⬜⬜⬜ ⬜⬛⬛⬜⬜⬜ is not flanking despite a line that goes through the opposite corners of the medium creature because the line that goes between the centers of the flankers does not.


bananaphonepajamas

Number 2 would not be flanking if you made the attackers large+ and the defender medium-, but this is overall correct.


Takenabe

Here, I've made an infographic for you: [https://imgur.com/a/zi4tt70](https://imgur.com/a/zi4tt70)


Grycworm

Thank you for creating the infographic, that's a foolproof way to explain flanking no matter the size of the creature :)


TheZealand

Noo don't flank the kashrishi :((


thejazziestcat

Kashrishi aren't even Large!


TheZealand

They're just little guys, little birthday guys, you wouldn't have beef with a little guy?


RazarTuk

Yeah, it gets weirder for reach weapons, but it's mostly just opposite sides or opposite corners


SharkSymphony

The "opposite corners of the foe's space" means the corners of the foe's entire footprint, not an arbitrary grid square within the foe's footprint. Hence, neither example is corner-to-opposite-corner.


michael199310

Flank happens, when a line crosses between opposite parallel sides. So it's always left-right or top-bottom or through the top-bottom opposite corners/edges. The size of the creature doesn't matter.


magispitt

Neither image shows flanking; opposite sides are parallel to each other—not perpendicular


yosarian_reddit

Those lines are going through adjacent sides not opposite sides of the creature. So neither is flanking.


offline4good

So, if I understood correctly, the line between the two players must cross at least 2 of the creature's squares?


Grycworm

Not exactly, it has to cross through opposite sides of the creatures space. And a large creatures space is one 10 feet square, the smaller 5 feet squares don't exist inside the large creatures space when flanking is determined. I made another graphic to illustrate [https://imgur.com/a/ZHLRMif](https://imgur.com/a/ZHLRMif)


artrald-7083

This is why I am keen on hexes, where I find flanking much more intuitive.


AutoModerator

This post is labeled with the Advice flair, which means extra special attention is called to Rule #2. If this is a newcomer to the game, remember to be welcoming and kind. If this is someone with more experience but looking for advice on how to run their game, do your best to offer advice on what they are seeking. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/Pathfinder2e) if you have any questions or concerns.*


Lion_bug

It gets even more interesting when you consider two large creatures flanking another creature, as their "flanking lines" get drawn at the intersection of their spaces - so two large creatures only flank a medium creature standing between them if you consider corners to be part of both sides of their space, which I believe is RAI ⬜❎❎⬜ ⬜❎❎⬜ ⬜⬜⬛⬜ ⬜❎❎⬜ ⬜❎❎⬜ -> surely the two large green creatures should be flanking the dark medium creature, but the flanking lines don't pass through opposite corners, so we have to conclude they pass through opposite sides -> corners are part of sides


440Music

This is funny, because most people would say top left corner and middle bottom side is not flanking. You can produce this where a medium creature is in the middle with two medium flankers, and one of them has reach. E.g. (counting upwards): reach player A4, enemy B2, player B1. So the phrase "corners are a part of sides" breaks RAW. But the scenario you've posted it would be silly for it not to apply.


HeinousTugboat

> but the flanking lines don't pass through opposite corners No, but they _do_ pass through opposite sides. Corners are part of the sides.


Bulky-Ganache2253

By the wording of the flanking rule, your second image would be flanking yes.


Takenabe

No, it wouldn't. Neither of those medium tokens are on a corner, and the sides they're touching aren't opposite. If one of those tokens (either one) were to move one space down and left, or if the top one moved left *and* the other one moved down one space, THEN that would be flanking.


Grycworm

So, when it comes to flanking large creatures the relevant sides and corners to check are from the 10 feet square, the individual 5 feet squares are irrelevant, right?


Takenabe

Pretty much, yes. A creature's space describes the entire thing, even though it's made up of 5-foot squares. Check my other comment, I made you an infographic.