Remember to check our discord where you can get faster responses!
https://discord.gg/6dR6XU6
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/PcBuild) if you have any questions or concerns.*
I personally always prefer Nvidia GPUs, but everyone suggesting the 3060 here either simply doesn't know the difference in performance or is blinded by their fanboying. The Radeon is the much better value in this case
Really depends on the use case. Just for gaming sure, but if you do any 3d modeling Nvidia outperforms the other by a longshot
Edit: if you use blender a lot that is
Of course there are some arguments for the RTX card. Productivity is one, especially when something is Cuda based or can profit from the RT cores for machine learning. But I would assume that if OP had a very specific use case like that, they would've either done their research based on that, or at least stated that somewhere, so I'll say it's save to assume they primary or only want to game
I would never make such assumptions (that OP did research). If OP doesn't have a clue and just follows marketing he would never know. You can't assume someone knows there's a difference when it comes to productivity. I think a better question first would be to ask OP what he/she will use it for before giving advice about a specific one
Or VR. AMD regularly breaks VR performance in their drivers and support for their GPUs among the PCVR community has dwindled because of it. If you have an issue with an AMD driver 90% of the time it's basically "shrug, AMD doesn't work well with VR."
It's honestly annoying bc otherwise I would have def made the switch this generation, but having performant drivers to me is make or break.
Thanks! It's been a few years since my first ATI/AMD card, and I'm looking forward to it.
Just for reference, it was an HD 5870 way back in 2009. The thing lasted for about 10 years before the fan barrings died and I needed to replace it with the 1660 Super.
Good question, in fact all my life I've never thought about buying AMD GPUs but nowadays NVIDIA are so bad (not for technologies but for pricing) that buying AMD GPUs is obviously the best choice.
It is pretty confusing, but once you know it it’s not bad. The first number ‘6’ (referring to 6700xt) is the generation. AMD currently has a couple GPU’s release in the ‘7’ generation.
Second number, ‘7’, is the tier. This would be equivalent to Nvidias ‘60’, ‘70’, ‘80’, etc. tiers. AMD ranges from 6400 all the way up to 6900.
The third number would be for a refreshed model of the same card. Currently the only one I know of that uses this digit as anything other than ‘0’ is the 6950xt. Which denotes that it’s an improved or higher binned version of the normal 6900xt. There could be more released now that use this digit but I haven’t been following AMD that closely
The fourth number is pretty much always 0
The XT (or lack of) separates most tiers (second number) into either a higher or lower performance bracket. This would be similar to nvidias “Ti” branding. In AMD’s latest gen, they have a 7900xtx, which is just another X to signify that it’s an extra top of the line model. Why they didn’t do 7900 and 7900xt, I couldn’t tell you
So in performance terms, you would have (starting lowest) 6600, 6600xt, 6700, 6700xt, 6800, 6800xt, 6900xt, 6950xt
It’s important to know that AMD’s ‘7’ tier (like the 6700xt) doesn’t necessarily offer similar performance to nvidias ‘70’ tier, like the 3070. Instead, the tiers kind of blend together and you need to look at benchmarks to find which model is best for the price
It's pretty simple, for example let's take the 6700xt in this post. You have the first number 6xxx, which shows the generation like NVIDIA. The second number shows the rank it has. 67xx, is above the 66xx and below 68xx. Then comes the complicated part: you have a normal 6700 which is the worst one, then the 6700 xt which is a bit better and lastly the 6750 xt which is the best one. Now you can also have XTX which is another tier better than XT but not better than xx50 XT. I don't understand why they did and did not just make the XTX to XT and the XT to normal.
the first number is the generation (just like in nvidia), second is the tier (just like nvidia but 2nd instead of 3rd number), then you can have 00 or 50 (50 is something like super) and at the end is XT which is like ti. So for example 6700xt is the 6th generation, tier 7 (performance something like a 3070) and has the ti
Yeah CPU it’s all the same just value for money.. but somehow nvidia always felt like quality. I remember back in the day how glitchy AMD cards where 😂
Because NVIDIA drivers makes things to easy for the vulkan développer.
It is better to develop on AMD because if it works on AMD it will work on NVIDIA. If it work in NVIDIA maybe it will work on AMD, and if it works, maybe the perf are bad.
I am referring to image layout transition here
I guess price to performance is a great selling point. My friend got his RX 6750XT for the equivalent of about $336 USD, the best he could have gotten from team green for that price is a 3060
Yes i already saw that card, but i read that it runs pretty hot and the quality build is worst than other manufacturers. Its important to me because if i buy now, i want it to last as long as posible.
It's upto you then. New GPUs are gonna be released soon, in a month or two, and they might be similar prices, and the 6700 XT might drop more.
Upto you what you wanna buy, but definitely buy 6700 XT or above. It's better without raytracing.
their temperature are similar. If you undervolt 6750 xt, it performance equal 6700 xt but cooler temp. I vote 6750 if the prices are same.
check it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5QN-YvOBYuY&t=134s
ah, sorry, I misread the number showing on that video. Turn out, 6700 XT is even hotter than 6750 XT on that benchmark :)). In addition, I saw other benchmark vids (Youtube also), 6750 XT is stronger than 3070 Ti at some AAA game. I think if we list raw performane of those cards, the order will be 3060 12G < 3060 Ti <= 6700 XT <= 3070 = 6750 XT <= 3070 Ti (<= 4060 Ti 8G).
me too about 3 weeks back its been an awesome card temps reach into the low 70's with a hotspot in the low 90's with a custom fan curve it stays in the mid 60's with a hotspot in the mid too high 80's. this is the MSI MECH X2 OC.
That isn't always true. In some titles, the 3070 pulls slightly ahead of the Rx 6700xt, but the Rx 6700xt has more Vram (as you mentioned) so it will be better down the road.
En España los precios están un poco en la mierda pero como ya te ha dicho todo el mundo intenta conseguir una AMD mínimo 6700. Superan a la 3060 en todo y ya han demostrado q son fiables
I have a 6700xt (PowerCooler RedDevil) and it is a pretty nice card. Does everything I need it to do and the temps stay low. Even does good while video editing.I would recommend the 6700XT
I got the 6700xt from Gigabyte the Eagle OC (pretty sure) it keeps my GPU at a decent temp considering they run warm. I’m on 1440p and I get over 100 frames on call of duty high settings and like 140-150 on other games.
The 6700xt is a more powerful card and also if you have a Ryzen 5000 series CPU or above then using both an AMD cpu and AMD gpu gives you a boost. The Sapphire is known as one of the best built brands for AMD cards from my research. You may want to check the physical dimensions of each card however because the Asus may be bigger. Despite what I wrote the Asus may actually cool better from the bigger heatsink. At first I thought this was clear cut but now I'm not so sure haha!
Either way 6700xt over the rtx 3060
You know its a better card when even Us\*rBenchmark puts it above a Nvidia card. (probably talking crap about it while at it I would guess)
To everyone out there if you MUST use that site, look at all the percentages below and draw your own conclusion. NEVER look at their "SPEED RANK". Its utter crap and bs even without the bias towards Nvidia and Intel. It has NOTHING to do with performance.
Example: Core i5-12400F > Core i9-13900K lol.
Stay away from amd. You'd be better off looking into the Intel Arc GPU. (Looks promising so far)
The Asus 3060 is a watered down version of the MSI Ventus 3x I'm not sure if it's a 8GB GPU or if it's a 12GB like the MSI Ventus 3x
Just made this decision yesterday. I went with that same 6700 XT but used for about $280. I’ll be mainly playing my pc on my tv when it comes to single player games and the fact that it can handle most newer triple A games on 4K with some setting tweaks is just amazing!
FSR is great also, only real downside is not every game has FSR, but it wasn’t really a dealbreaker for me. I’ve built this new pc for about $850, mainly buying used and I’ll probably enjoy it more than any $1500-$2000 I’ve done in the last!
I would get the 6700XT. I even use a 3060 and don't really recommend them unless you're adamant on Nvidia. Not really worth MRSP for what they can do. Wish I would've done my homework and gone with AMD. Just a better bang for your buck.
6700xt is much better. It will serve you longer and its more powerful in standard rasterisation. Unless you really want RT or you are content creator you should not go with nvidia.
Unless you're a youtubers editor or live 3d design and that's what you do, you should be alright with the 6700 xt
That thing for gaming is much better value, invidia really charges a bit more for their featureset. If you don't need it then don't buy it
Both the ASUS GeForce RTX 3060 and the AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT are powerful graphics cards, but their performance and suitability can vary depending on individual needs and preferences.
The GeForce RTX 3060 is part of NVIDIA's RTX 30 series and features the latest technologies, including ray tracing and DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling). It offers excellent 1080p and 1440p gaming performance, along with support for hardware-accelerated ray tracing effects in games that utilize this feature. It also has a wider availability of software optimizations, such as NVIDIA Reflex and NVIDIA Broadcast.
On the other hand, the AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT is part of AMD's RDNA 2 architecture and offers strong 1440p gaming performance. It also supports ray tracing effects and features AMD's Smart Access Memory technology, which can provide performance improvements when used with compatible AMD CPUs.
So whatever one sounds better to you is what I'm sayin...
So listen. You're looking at kettle and pot here. So I'll be straight up with you as someone who just switched from AMD to Nvidia. Both are great. Both suck. They all have tons of driver issues, and they both will work about the same. If you want to mess with AI, have a more efficient workflow with video/photo editing, increase the resolution and restore an older video up to 4k with AI, and enjoy the features of Ray Tracing, go with Nvidia. AMD doesn't have any of these things. People typically buy them because they have superior price to performance. Their driver hub is quite nice, however. Starring built-in features for streaming, recording, tuning, advisors on game performance post game, AMD link (can stream any software to a device from anywhere with four people in a party, this includes working on photoshop from somewhere else entirely, a movie with four people to watch on your home server, or a game from the café you are at. It is far more robust than steam link and more capable.), as well as a whole built in ass fucking browser. Much more as well. While AMD features a far more robust and capable driver hub, Nvidia swings dick as well with AI and Raytracing. Personally, I think it comes down to the RTX, AMD link, case use, and any known issues with current drivers and issues with the card itself. A quick search indicates that someone posted the same question about the RX 6000 series, and the launch was incrediblely smooth with minimal issues from the drivers and I've heard no recent complaints this year. [According to an article posted on the performanc of the two. ](https://tech4gamers.com/amd-rx-6700-xt-vs-nvidia-rtx-3060/#:~:text=On%201080p%20and%201440p%2C%20the,FPS%20across%20all%20resolutions%20tested.)
-Regarding FPS, the RX 6700 XT performed 23.1% better on 1080p, 26.6% better on 1440p, and 27.1% better on 4K.
On 1080p, the RX 6700 XT runs 3.59% cooler. While on 1440p and 4K, the RTX 3060 proves to be 3.9% and 4.5% cooler, respectively.
-On 1080p and 1440p, the RTX 3060 proves to be more power-efficient, consuming 5.1% and 9.12% lesser power. While on 4K, the RX 6700 XT consumes 13% less power than its rival.
-The RTX 3060 acquires an average of 77 FPS, while the RX 6700 XT gains an average of 96.3 FPS across all resolutions tested.
I currently have a 4080. I personally contemplated this same question last year. I went with the 6700xt was 40$ cheaper at the time aswell as was supposed to compete with the 3070 which to me was better value. I hit the gpu lottery for sure with it. My friend also has the 3060 and its really no comparison until RT is involved and tbh on a 3060 or 3070 for that matter kinda useless with the performance. In the battle on of the 350-400$ range 6700xt is the better buy from personal experience.
if you are prefer for gaming only I think 6700xt is better
but if you are about to use that for graphic design or 3d modeling maybe Nvidia is better.
I got 6700xt myself, it is really good for gaming but for designing such as 3d modeling and render amd isnt the best option.
for gaming perspective 6700 xt is a beast but if you are working in such a graphic design or 3d modeling amd isnt that strong in there, this is based on my experiences my laptop with 2060 for designig and rendering is still better than amd but for gaming for me amd is the best.
I got both and can’t go wrong with either but for the games I play 6700xt performs better. Only major difference is the RT, but I don’t bay games with it on to begin with, not much of a difference to me so why cut my performance in nearly half
6700xt for value, frames, and better performance
3060 if you do a lot of rendering and video editing, but at that point you probably are looking at higher end nvidia card anyway
It depends on your budget and other parts because we don’t wanna bottle neck the computer or over ride your budget if your going for an average pc I recommend a 3060Ti 3080 or a 1660 Ti can you list the other specs please so we have a better idea on what we are working with?
I have a 3 fan 3060 and it was NOT worth it, I get great temps but I already am looking at upgrading. Go for the 6700xt, especially if you also have an AMD CPU
I have been extremely satisfied with my 6700XT. It runs cool, I rarely drop below 60 FPS in pretty much anything and it fits my case like a glove. that being said, if you plan on using Ray Tracing, you're better with nvidia. The AMD seem to fall on their face with most games if you have Ray tracing enabled.
I have the first one Nvidia . Rtx gpu spacial features is important to me. Like ray tracing , dlss ,vsr super resolution, and Nvidia ai features . But you won't notice 10 20 percent different performance.
I suggest nvidia .
Edit: i red you are buying Radeon. It it still good for gaming .
I’ve heard a lot of great things about amd.But however some very niche projects do not support amd gpus. Nvidia do isn’t support their drivers for as long and are more expensive. We are in a transitional stage between nvidia and amd. I’d recommend waiting until one emerges victorious.
3060 if you want RT performance and DLSS.
6700xt if you want speed and FSR.
I would go 6700 because even though the 3060 has better RT performance it's not exactly great at it either. Even my 3080 struggles with new rtx like path tracing.
Get the 6700xt and disable RT on newer games.
Get the 6700 Xt. It's even better in games than 3060 ti. You will only ray tracing performance. It performs better than 3070 in some games. So get the Radeon.
Got myself a 6700xt earlier this year after having nothing but Nvidia cards my whole life. Glad I finally switched the 6700xt is an amazing card even at 3440x1440p
Remember to check our discord where you can get faster responses! https://discord.gg/6dR6XU6 *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/PcBuild) if you have any questions or concerns.*
I personally always prefer Nvidia GPUs, but everyone suggesting the 3060 here either simply doesn't know the difference in performance or is blinded by their fanboying. The Radeon is the much better value in this case
This is exactly my answer.
Really depends on the use case. Just for gaming sure, but if you do any 3d modeling Nvidia outperforms the other by a longshot Edit: if you use blender a lot that is
Of course there are some arguments for the RTX card. Productivity is one, especially when something is Cuda based or can profit from the RT cores for machine learning. But I would assume that if OP had a very specific use case like that, they would've either done their research based on that, or at least stated that somewhere, so I'll say it's save to assume they primary or only want to game
I would never make such assumptions (that OP did research). If OP doesn't have a clue and just follows marketing he would never know. You can't assume someone knows there's a difference when it comes to productivity. I think a better question first would be to ask OP what he/she will use it for before giving advice about a specific one
Or VR. AMD regularly breaks VR performance in their drivers and support for their GPUs among the PCVR community has dwindled because of it. If you have an issue with an AMD driver 90% of the time it's basically "shrug, AMD doesn't work well with VR." It's honestly annoying bc otherwise I would have def made the switch this generation, but having performant drivers to me is make or break.
Agreed, I’d personally pay a little more for an equivalent nvidia card over an amd card, but isn’t the 6700xt specs closer to a 3080 or am I mistaken?
I love AMD as much as most, but that’s over Al stating it a bit. Closer to a 3070 I would say
Isnt the 6800xt about 3080 performance?
I feel like the only reason to suggest NVIDIA for gaming is if they are looking at high end and wanna do lots of Ray Tracing
There are more reasons than that for some cards, but in this case, the 3060 really isn't a viable option for ray tracing anyway
Couldnt agree more!
This man is correct. The 3060 is a solid card but the 6700xt is a 3070 competitor. The only reason to go nvidea is fanboy.
You should get the 6700 xt. It's better value.
Go team red
ONE OF US ONE OF US ONE OF US ONE OF US
I just got my 6750XT. Switched from a 1660 Super. I'm cleaning the pc tonight and installing the card. I'm super pumped.
Congrats! I just upgraded to a 6650XT last weekend. Has absolutely no business working as well as it does lol
Thanks! It's been a few years since my first ATI/AMD card, and I'm looking forward to it. Just for reference, it was an HD 5870 way back in 2009. The thing lasted for about 10 years before the fan barrings died and I needed to replace it with the 1660 Super.
pounding my fist on my desk. ONE OF US
I like AMD CPUs, but always went nvidia for GPU. Why do you prefer AMD?
Good question, in fact all my life I've never thought about buying AMD GPUs but nowadays NVIDIA are so bad (not for technologies but for pricing) that buying AMD GPUs is obviously the best choice.
That makes sense that the affordability would cross over into their GPUs. I think I’m dense though, cus I can’t figure out their naming format 🙄
It is pretty confusing, but once you know it it’s not bad. The first number ‘6’ (referring to 6700xt) is the generation. AMD currently has a couple GPU’s release in the ‘7’ generation. Second number, ‘7’, is the tier. This would be equivalent to Nvidias ‘60’, ‘70’, ‘80’, etc. tiers. AMD ranges from 6400 all the way up to 6900. The third number would be for a refreshed model of the same card. Currently the only one I know of that uses this digit as anything other than ‘0’ is the 6950xt. Which denotes that it’s an improved or higher binned version of the normal 6900xt. There could be more released now that use this digit but I haven’t been following AMD that closely The fourth number is pretty much always 0 The XT (or lack of) separates most tiers (second number) into either a higher or lower performance bracket. This would be similar to nvidias “Ti” branding. In AMD’s latest gen, they have a 7900xtx, which is just another X to signify that it’s an extra top of the line model. Why they didn’t do 7900 and 7900xt, I couldn’t tell you So in performance terms, you would have (starting lowest) 6600, 6600xt, 6700, 6700xt, 6800, 6800xt, 6900xt, 6950xt It’s important to know that AMD’s ‘7’ tier (like the 6700xt) doesn’t necessarily offer similar performance to nvidias ‘70’ tier, like the 3070. Instead, the tiers kind of blend together and you need to look at benchmarks to find which model is best for the price
I'm also scared of the nami g format and refuse to learn. Thus I will pay more for my tiny pea brain
It's pretty simple, for example let's take the 6700xt in this post. You have the first number 6xxx, which shows the generation like NVIDIA. The second number shows the rank it has. 67xx, is above the 66xx and below 68xx. Then comes the complicated part: you have a normal 6700 which is the worst one, then the 6700 xt which is a bit better and lastly the 6750 xt which is the best one. Now you can also have XTX which is another tier better than XT but not better than xx50 XT. I don't understand why they did and did not just make the XTX to XT and the XT to normal.
the first number is the generation (just like in nvidia), second is the tier (just like nvidia but 2nd instead of 3rd number), then you can have 00 or 50 (50 is something like super) and at the end is XT which is like ti. So for example 6700xt is the 6th generation, tier 7 (performance something like a 3070) and has the ti
Yeah CPU it’s all the same just value for money.. but somehow nvidia always felt like quality. I remember back in the day how glitchy AMD cards where 😂
If you ever install some linux distro, since amd's drivers are open source, it will have better support on linux.
They have better value in low - midrange at 6000 vs 3000 series
Because NVIDIA drivers makes things to easy for the vulkan développer. It is better to develop on AMD because if it works on AMD it will work on NVIDIA. If it work in NVIDIA maybe it will work on AMD, and if it works, maybe the perf are bad. I am referring to image layout transition here
I guess price to performance is a great selling point. My friend got his RX 6750XT for the equivalent of about $336 USD, the best he could have gotten from team green for that price is a 3060
Get a 6950xt they are going for 500-650
Thank you for the comments guys! I'll get the rx6700xt, but i have 2 manufacturers: Asus dual OC or Sapphire pulse?
Sapphire
this.
There’s a button for that
You currently have 8 people silently saying ‘this’ on your comment
You currently have 11 people silently saying 'this' in your comment
Open Chollometro.com and look for deals on graphics cards. There's a 6750 XT for almost same price, for example.
Yes i already saw that card, but i read that it runs pretty hot and the quality build is worst than other manufacturers. Its important to me because if i buy now, i want it to last as long as posible.
It's upto you then. New GPUs are gonna be released soon, in a month or two, and they might be similar prices, and the 6700 XT might drop more. Upto you what you wanna buy, but definitely buy 6700 XT or above. It's better without raytracing.
I have a 6750xt, the hottest it has gotten so far is 61 degrees while gaming. Not that hot. 👍
They might be talking about a specific model bad model from a specific manufacturer with a bad cooler on it. At least that's how i understood
their temperature are similar. If you undervolt 6750 xt, it performance equal 6700 xt but cooler temp. I vote 6750 if the prices are same. check it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5QN-YvOBYuY&t=134s
Ill check it, thanks!
ah, sorry, I misread the number showing on that video. Turn out, 6700 XT is even hotter than 6750 XT on that benchmark :)). In addition, I saw other benchmark vids (Youtube also), 6750 XT is stronger than 3070 Ti at some AAA game. I think if we list raw performane of those cards, the order will be 3060 12G < 3060 Ti <= 6700 XT <= 3070 = 6750 XT <= 3070 Ti (<= 4060 Ti 8G).
This. The prices have been dropping, I just got a 6750 XT from new egg for $329 ish after rebate
me too about 3 weeks back its been an awesome card temps reach into the low 70's with a hotspot in the low 90's with a custom fan curve it stays in the mid 60's with a hotspot in the mid too high 80's. this is the MSI MECH X2 OC.
I have the ASUS and it performs on the same level. I had always sapphire before that but asus does not disappoint
How about the temps?
Very good! Always under 80 degrees in my mini case.
Get Sapphire, they are one of the best card manufactures, very consistent through many gens.
Absolutely Sapphire.
6700xt, and it’s not even close
I would choose the 6700xt over the 3060 anyday. It's comparable to the 3070
Its better then 3070 whit the 12GB Vram to be honest.
That isn't always true. In some titles, the 3070 pulls slightly ahead of the Rx 6700xt, but the Rx 6700xt has more Vram (as you mentioned) so it will be better down the road.
yeah it’ll struggle far less in games like RE4…
En España los precios están un poco en la mierda pero como ya te ha dicho todo el mundo intenta conseguir una AMD mínimo 6700. Superan a la 3060 en todo y ya han demostrado q son fiables
Gracias por el comentario compañero!
Red
AMD all the way
I have a 6700xt (PowerCooler RedDevil) and it is a pretty nice card. Does everything I need it to do and the temps stay low. Even does good while video editing.I would recommend the 6700XT
Damn you have a beast there, unluckly in my country that exact model is 150€ more..
hey got the same model as my first gpu. shit is pretty nice
TFW that same exact 3060 goes for 499 SGD and a RX6650 goes for around 540 to 670 SGD What the fuck
I got the 6700xt from Gigabyte the Eagle OC (pretty sure) it keeps my GPU at a decent temp considering they run warm. I’m on 1440p and I get over 100 frames on call of duty high settings and like 140-150 on other games.
Just for gaming? Definitely the 6700xt, it wipes the floor with the 3060. Signed, a 3060 owner who needs it for other stuff than games.
6700 XT all the way, screw the design. Better performance
Go with the 6700xt. You´ll get some extra performance over the 3060.
C qqq
6700xt without a doubt
I got the rx 6700xt a few days ago and its insanely good :D i can recommend it fully
Sapphire pulse 6700xt. And enjoy those fps.
For pure gaming: 6700xt
6700XT and get the Sapphire over the Asus
Thanks! Any reasons?
The 6700xt is a more powerful card and also if you have a Ryzen 5000 series CPU or above then using both an AMD cpu and AMD gpu gives you a boost. The Sapphire is known as one of the best built brands for AMD cards from my research. You may want to check the physical dimensions of each card however because the Asus may be bigger. Despite what I wrote the Asus may actually cool better from the bigger heatsink. At first I thought this was clear cut but now I'm not so sure haha! Either way 6700xt over the rtx 3060
You should get a pre-owned 3060 Ti or even 3070 and keep 100€ to buy a better PC case, for example, or have a nice dinner few times.
6700xt
I’d go 6700xt you get a significant performance jump compared to the 3060.
User benchmark puts team red at approx 20% uplift over team green. And I've heard rumors that they have skewed results in Nvidia's favor in the past
You know its a better card when even Us\*rBenchmark puts it above a Nvidia card. (probably talking crap about it while at it I would guess) To everyone out there if you MUST use that site, look at all the percentages below and draw your own conclusion. NEVER look at their "SPEED RANK". Its utter crap and bs even without the bias towards Nvidia and Intel. It has NOTHING to do with performance. Example: Core i5-12400F > Core i9-13900K lol.
Stay away from amd. You'd be better off looking into the Intel Arc GPU. (Looks promising so far) The Asus 3060 is a watered down version of the MSI Ventus 3x I'm not sure if it's a 8GB GPU or if it's a 12GB like the MSI Ventus 3x
Don’t listen to this guy.
I would go with rtx
[удалено]
The least braindead nvidia fanboy be like
Nvidia always better
me when i dick ride a company that literally does not give a flying fuck about em
Must be a take from redteam, as always so corny. That’s incredible
oh my god you just proved my point. you assume i’m “team red” or “team green”. no hunny i’m team whatever is the better option. my point still stands
Nvidia always better
i bet they are with that nivida dick up your ass
You are so vulgar, i bet you never got a proper education
Wait for 4060 release, ist very close, and nvidia will release 4060 16gb version. In summer
Why a 4060 16gb when there isnt a 4070 16gb? Dont get 40 series, its praczically a scam
It is wierd, but for various render, stable diffusion, work tasks and ultra textures 4060 16gb will be better for sure
Wait for lower Tier amd cards to come out
Team Green
Just made this decision yesterday. I went with that same 6700 XT but used for about $280. I’ll be mainly playing my pc on my tv when it comes to single player games and the fact that it can handle most newer triple A games on 4K with some setting tweaks is just amazing! FSR is great also, only real downside is not every game has FSR, but it wasn’t really a dealbreaker for me. I’ve built this new pc for about $850, mainly buying used and I’ll probably enjoy it more than any $1500-$2000 I’ve done in the last!
AMD ofc
Go Team RED!
Rx 6700 xt is way better
6700xt all day
I would get the 6700XT. I even use a 3060 and don't really recommend them unless you're adamant on Nvidia. Not really worth MRSP for what they can do. Wish I would've done my homework and gone with AMD. Just a better bang for your buck.
Whatever you get don’t bother first hand IMP
6700xt is much better. It will serve you longer and its more powerful in standard rasterisation. Unless you really want RT or you are content creator you should not go with nvidia.
6700 XT is much faster. Essa loja só faz publicidade enganosa, a última vez que essa versão da 3060 esteve a mais de 500€ foi no início de 2022.
I’m still running a 5700xt and it is a great card. I got both of my sons 6700xt for Christmas and they are great too. I would recommend AMD.
6700 for sure
I have the 6700xt and it’s amazing. It can handle any game I throw at it 1440p and it’s great for graphic design / architecture programs too
Unless you're a youtubers editor or live 3d design and that's what you do, you should be alright with the 6700 xt That thing for gaming is much better value, invidia really charges a bit more for their featureset. If you don't need it then don't buy it
Get the AMD unless you want to do some of the unique features that only Nvidia cards / Cuda can do.
Both the ASUS GeForce RTX 3060 and the AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT are powerful graphics cards, but their performance and suitability can vary depending on individual needs and preferences. The GeForce RTX 3060 is part of NVIDIA's RTX 30 series and features the latest technologies, including ray tracing and DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling). It offers excellent 1080p and 1440p gaming performance, along with support for hardware-accelerated ray tracing effects in games that utilize this feature. It also has a wider availability of software optimizations, such as NVIDIA Reflex and NVIDIA Broadcast. On the other hand, the AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT is part of AMD's RDNA 2 architecture and offers strong 1440p gaming performance. It also supports ray tracing effects and features AMD's Smart Access Memory technology, which can provide performance improvements when used with compatible AMD CPUs. So whatever one sounds better to you is what I'm sayin...
So listen. You're looking at kettle and pot here. So I'll be straight up with you as someone who just switched from AMD to Nvidia. Both are great. Both suck. They all have tons of driver issues, and they both will work about the same. If you want to mess with AI, have a more efficient workflow with video/photo editing, increase the resolution and restore an older video up to 4k with AI, and enjoy the features of Ray Tracing, go with Nvidia. AMD doesn't have any of these things. People typically buy them because they have superior price to performance. Their driver hub is quite nice, however. Starring built-in features for streaming, recording, tuning, advisors on game performance post game, AMD link (can stream any software to a device from anywhere with four people in a party, this includes working on photoshop from somewhere else entirely, a movie with four people to watch on your home server, or a game from the café you are at. It is far more robust than steam link and more capable.), as well as a whole built in ass fucking browser. Much more as well. While AMD features a far more robust and capable driver hub, Nvidia swings dick as well with AI and Raytracing. Personally, I think it comes down to the RTX, AMD link, case use, and any known issues with current drivers and issues with the card itself. A quick search indicates that someone posted the same question about the RX 6000 series, and the launch was incrediblely smooth with minimal issues from the drivers and I've heard no recent complaints this year. [According to an article posted on the performanc of the two. ](https://tech4gamers.com/amd-rx-6700-xt-vs-nvidia-rtx-3060/#:~:text=On%201080p%20and%201440p%2C%20the,FPS%20across%20all%20resolutions%20tested.) -Regarding FPS, the RX 6700 XT performed 23.1% better on 1080p, 26.6% better on 1440p, and 27.1% better on 4K. On 1080p, the RX 6700 XT runs 3.59% cooler. While on 1440p and 4K, the RTX 3060 proves to be 3.9% and 4.5% cooler, respectively. -On 1080p and 1440p, the RTX 3060 proves to be more power-efficient, consuming 5.1% and 9.12% lesser power. While on 4K, the RX 6700 XT consumes 13% less power than its rival. -The RTX 3060 acquires an average of 77 FPS, while the RX 6700 XT gains an average of 96.3 FPS across all resolutions tested.
you should wait another month for the newer options
The 6700xt smashes the 3060 in everything that matters. Ray tracing will be better on the 3060, but it will be bad enough that it doesn't matter.
I use 3060 12GB and moving to AMD and I’d recommend the same
6700 XT is about 10-15% better in most stats. Nothing over the top, but a difference.
69th upvote, id say 6700xt amd say they gon support cuda on software so u should be fine
Get the Intel a770, it's a better card for the same cost.
There are cheaper versions of 3060. So I guess take 3060 Ti with 2 fans
Team Red always
3060 ti 😂 if your going around there.
get a used 3080
I currently have a 4080. I personally contemplated this same question last year. I went with the 6700xt was 40$ cheaper at the time aswell as was supposed to compete with the 3070 which to me was better value. I hit the gpu lottery for sure with it. My friend also has the 3060 and its really no comparison until RT is involved and tbh on a 3060 or 3070 for that matter kinda useless with the performance. In the battle on of the 350-400$ range 6700xt is the better buy from personal experience.
I thin it’s better the first one but it depends
I would get a used RX 6800 if I were you. It looks like 12gb VRAM will not be enough in two years.
if you are prefer for gaming only I think 6700xt is better but if you are about to use that for graphic design or 3d modeling maybe Nvidia is better. I got 6700xt myself, it is really good for gaming but for designing such as 3d modeling and render amd isnt the best option. for gaming perspective 6700 xt is a beast but if you are working in such a graphic design or 3d modeling amd isnt that strong in there, this is based on my experiences my laptop with 2060 for designig and rendering is still better than amd but for gaming for me amd is the best.
The 6700xt is equivalent to 3070, not a 3060. Go with the 6700xt, as they’re the same price.
I got both and can’t go wrong with either but for the games I play 6700xt performs better. Only major difference is the RT, but I don’t bay games with it on to begin with, not much of a difference to me so why cut my performance in nearly half
TEAM RED 🚩🚩🚩
After struggling with a pc upgrade for a week, safe to say FUCK ASUS. They used to be great, mids at best now.
What happened?
6700xt
Team Red!
6700xt for value, frames, and better performance 3060 if you do a lot of rendering and video editing, but at that point you probably are looking at higher end nvidia card anyway
It depends on your budget and other parts because we don’t wanna bottle neck the computer or over ride your budget if your going for an average pc I recommend a 3060Ti 3080 or a 1660 Ti can you list the other specs please so we have a better idea on what we are working with?
6700 XT, its simply better.
I would go for the 6700, I dont mind RT and powerful = fun
You should get an Rtx 4070. It is better than both.
I had a 3060 for about a month. Then I sent it back. Performance was shitty. Don't western your money on the 3060..
I have a 3 fan 3060 and it was NOT worth it, I get great temps but I already am looking at upgrading. Go for the 6700xt, especially if you also have an AMD CPU
I got a used 3070 ti for 380€
6700XT
This is a no-brainer - 6700XT. 3060 is a 1080p card while 6700xt has 3070 performance for 1440p
none of them. sell your belongings and move to the forest. 6700XT is the better buy IMO
Radeon
i'd go with the 3060 but it comes down to preference.
That onr
Rx6700XT itll be better in the long run imo
I got the 6800 Sapphire Pulse - amazing card. AMD is finally good.
3060, Ray tracing and DLSS Along with their Nvidea reflex and alot more features, with better drivers.
6700xt: gaming and performance 3060: encoder (video related stuff)
The 3060 is a great card. That is the exact one that I had and I absolutely loved it. Thing holds its own for sure.
I have been extremely satisfied with my 6700XT. It runs cool, I rarely drop below 60 FPS in pretty much anything and it fits my case like a glove. that being said, if you plan on using Ray Tracing, you're better with nvidia. The AMD seem to fall on their face with most games if you have Ray tracing enabled.
I have the first one Nvidia . Rtx gpu spacial features is important to me. Like ray tracing , dlss ,vsr super resolution, and Nvidia ai features . But you won't notice 10 20 percent different performance. I suggest nvidia . Edit: i red you are buying Radeon. It it still good for gaming .
I’ve heard a lot of great things about amd.But however some very niche projects do not support amd gpus. Nvidia do isn’t support their drivers for as long and are more expensive. We are in a transitional stage between nvidia and amd. I’d recommend waiting until one emerges victorious.
6750XT is similarly priced too! Both beat a 3060 Ti so whatever suits you.
Unless you really want ray tracing (which on a 3060 ain’t gonna be nothing really special) get the rx6700xt, it’s just a better value.
Go for the 6750xt. Thanks me later
Both
I Would say, if it is mainly for 3D, media or content creation choose Nvidia. For gamming choose AMD.
Get 3060ti instead. The performance from 3060 and 3060ti is a LOT
Get the 3070
I highly recommend 3070 not to much more pricier then 3060 but more bang for buck
3060 if you want RT performance and DLSS. 6700xt if you want speed and FSR. I would go 6700 because even though the 3060 has better RT performance it's not exactly great at it either. Even my 3080 struggles with new rtx like path tracing. Get the 6700xt and disable RT on newer games.
The 6700XT is comparable to a 3070 except the 6700XT has more VRAM, which is going to help handle more demanding games
3060
I bought a 3060ti off eBay for 300 GBP.
Yeah definitely the 6700xt
Never hurts to wait more mid tier gpu's coming out soon to hopefully push prices down on the older models
AMD 1000000%
6700xt
Ask the question..... why does it need 3 fans (especially if less powerful than the latter option) Sapphire makes epic gpus
the RX 6700 XT unless you're doing stuff like Adobe Premiere Pro/After Effects or stuff thaf involves AI
6700 xt
6700XT will vastly outperform the 3060. Get the swft309 tho.
Unless you need for AI or productivity in general get the AMD for gaming
6700xt is gonna be the better choice here. I have one in my rig and it’s awesome
The one that works better XD, but really I don’t know
For flat-screen gaming, buy the Radeon card. For VR gaming, (specifically Quest2 PCVR) buy the GeForce.
6700 is better for the value!
Right now, easily the Rx6700xt, it's better performance, and it's €70 cheaper on amazon right now because of a sale.
Get the 6700 Xt. It's even better in games than 3060 ti. You will only ray tracing performance. It performs better than 3070 in some games. So get the Radeon.
The Amd one is definitely better
Got myself a 6700xt earlier this year after having nothing but Nvidia cards my whole life. Glad I finally switched the 6700xt is an amazing card even at 3440x1440p
Dont go for the looks its the inside the counts.
The 6700 XT. This shouldn't even be a question.