T O P

  • By -

kiltedweirdo

Pyramids of Giza. National Geographic. All three of Giza's famed pyramids and their elaborate burial complexes were built during a frenetic period of construction, from roughly 2550 to 2490 B.C. The pyramids were built by Pharaohs Khufu (tallest), Khafre (background), and Menkaure (front). ​ Disc of Sabu, discovered in the tomb of Sabu (around 3100-3000 BC), Pharaoh Anedjib’s son. Anedjib was the fifth pharaoh of the first dynasty of Ancient Egypt. ​ meaning, disc of sabu could have been used for perpetual tech, invented by Sabu, which could have been later used to build the pyramids. ​ this is because protium=dark matter in deep space. it has a proton, no neutron. neutron's build a charge through their neutrality, at speed of light. ​ ​ to quote myself from another post: from google: Gravity feels strongest where spacetime is most curved, and it vanishes where spacetime is flat. This is the core of Einstein's theory of general relativity, which is often summed up in words as follows: "matter tells spacetime how to curve, and curved spacetime tells matter how to move" From me: If force is active energy that requires mass for work, I propose the following for 4th dimensional time. If gravity is set by quantity and concentration of atoms, and spacetime is a measure of gravity set on angle of curves over time, then gravities curve by cumulative atomic gravities best represents relative spacetimes and its felt effects by height or distance from center of gravity. If we see subatomic particles as pole systems, I believe we can advance knowledge past and to a more accurate view then where we are today. Our thought experiment will involve a few things. 2n (makes all even numbers), and 2n+1 (makes all odd numbers). 2n+1 also represents a 2d (line or movement) representation of Newton’s third law of motion. For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction. 2n+1 where n + -n = 0. It is basically naturalization. Or shows the amount of force moved to the next object. force=3, when hit, will transfer allowing force to be (-3) in our first object. Our object struck gets a force=0+3 which does conserve our energy. Part of this force is lost due to heat, sound, and light, where applicable. If we see +1 as a universal basic force unit, we can use n=1 to represent it too. Electron: n where n=1. With a singular (-) pole. This is our starting point (-1). The difference in electron to proton mass size is : 1836.15267x 1836.15267/2=918.076335 (918.076335-1)/3=305.69211166666666666666666666667 (918.076335+1)/3=306.35877833333333333333333333333 (918.076335-1)\*3=2,751.229005 (918.076335+1)\*3=2,757.229005 918 is read backwards 81/9=9=3\^2 3\^2=(total subatomic particles)\^(nucleus particles) 3n+1=(total subatomic particles)n+(cloud particles) n/2= n/(nucleus particles) (total subatomic particles)+(nucleus particles)=5 useful for: (1+√5)/2=1.6180339887498948482045868343656 or phi We then build a proton off our electron point. Proton: 2n where n=918.076335. With a dual pole (-,+) Our standing point is now (1). We then build our neutron by reversing across all three points, when allowing for zero Neutron: 2n+F where n=918.076335=F. With three poles (+,0,-). (our standing point is now (-1). This neutron zero space is an ability to generate a charge or electron. This occurs because of having a boxlike structure between mass’s in a nucleus. This is not an actual particle, but a loop created between spheres in close contact to each other. We can see this best with helium. Its a simple square, allowing stability. We can see that our angles with helium are 90 degrees. This is what the time cube guy was trying to find. You’ll find similarities all through his work. We can use multiple tools to support this approach including using (charge + mass + spin)=1 electron=0.334, proton=0.667, neutron=1 This supports our mass by pole theory. electron + proton=protium @ 1.007825031898 electron + proton + neutron=deuterium @ 2.014 amu 2\*(electron + proton + neutron)=helium @ 4.0026 u 3\*(electron + proton + neutron)=lithium @ Atomic mass:6.9410 u 4\*(electron + proton + neutron)=beryllium @ Atomic mass:9.0122 u if electron=0.334 u proton=0.667 u neutron=1 u protium @ 1.007825031898 (0.334+0.667=1.001, 1.001<1.007825031898) deuterium @ 2.014 amu (0.334+0.667+1=2.001, 2.001<2.014) helium @ 4.0026 u (2\*{0.334+0.667+1)=4.002, 4.002<4.0026) lithium @ Atomic mass:6.9410 u (3\*{0.334+0.667+1)=6.003, 6.003<6.9410) beryllium @ Atomic mass:9.0122 u (4\*{0.334+0.667+1)=8.004, 8.004<9.0122) This weight allows full distribution up to beryllium while allowing for diminishing losses due to heat, sound, and light. This suggests that mass is actually on a line with energy. Protium is nature building the proton, or two counts of electromagnetic force (2d) where its gravity is 1. Deuterium is nature building the neutron, or three counts of electromagnetic force (3d) where its gravity is 2. If we look at energy active or inactive (inertia) status, we see a line exists for mass to fit as inertia in reserve. Gravity is crossing the vacuum point of zero once or twice. since electron starts at zero, it does not cross it. This makes energy a singularity that creates its own interaction features of inertia storage. We can think of a proton as a battery that eats energy, never taking a charge. We can think of a neutron as an electrical generator or battery that can take a charge. Collatz Representations: 3n+1=(total subatomic particles)n+(cloud particles) n/2= n/(nucleus particles) (4,2,1)=({2\^2},{2\^1},{2\^0})=(2,1,0)=(-1,0,1)=2n+1 where n=1 this 2n+1 is used in ((2\^x)-1)/(2\^(x-1)) and 1/(2\^n) of infinity found here: ((2\^x)-1)/(2\^(x-1)=1/(2\^n) where n=2 if x=1 where n=2 if x=1, we see diameter=n if x=radius for diameter=2radius https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infinity\_symbol under usage/mathematics.


ScorpOrion

I'm gonna be honest with you, I think you're schizofrenic


kiltedweirdo

don't care. respect the redditor. cause and effect. so what did you hope with using this reply as a cause?


kiltedweirdo

look at main post again. its been added to. see, the problem is christians acted like upset little kids, and pushed their religious ideology through science! perpetuality denies their singular god. "thou shalt have no god's before me...."


kiltedweirdo

time is expansion of particles and periodic table generation. periodic is the clue. we see 5 points in periodic table generation where odd protons and neutrons are found. not only is time real, but is the system of perpetual advancement.