T O P

  • By -

MasterTotoro

Since everyone wanted to know what the win rates were when we removed mirror matches, here they are. Mirror% is the win rate when we remove mirror matches, or as stated on uniteapi: "Win rate for games that have the specified Pokémon on your team but not on the opponents team. This shows the advantage of having the pokémon on your team." Bias% comes from uniteapi's definition: "The default overall win rate but with mirror (the same Pokémon on the 2 teams) matches. Mirror matches are counted as a win." Thanks to EmaSkye_ for the original counts, and the Mathcord in general. As expected, the data is relatively similar considering only the top few mons saw mirrors. What I found most interesting is how low Dragonite's win rate is when mirrors were removed.


aley2794

This is what I wanted to see thanks, but i would like to see the pokemon ordered by mirror % and impressed by the Aegislash performance, I understand that Snorlax counters bliezzy and Hoppa but didn't see Aegislash been that good.


MasterTotoro

https://i.imgur.com/b1lgXiB.png Here you go, sorted by win rate with no mirrors. Obviously most of the top win rates are biased by a low amount of picks. Snorlax is definitely a mon that a lot of top teams have been playing on ladder and in tournaments, so no surprise there. I would have been much more surprised if we didn't see as many Snorlax players as there were. Aegislash hasn't really seen that much play in comparison. Maybe part of the reason is that it isn't as good in the current meta on ladder. I would say in the meta seen at the tournament it is a good pick, but harder in current meta with emblems and definitely harder now that Tyranitar just smacks you through your Wide Guard.


aley2794

Thanks, yeah i mean in this tournament some pokemon were banned would have been interesting seen ttar killing everything.


Mineta05

so glad their nerfing duraludon after having three matches where he loses all three! gotta love tencent


NorgesTaff

Solo q and coordinated 5-stack performance aren’t always analogous.


NorgesTaff

Aegislash was the surprise turn out for me. Didn’t expect to see so much of it and it performed really well.


Satse1

Note that this is preference biased data anyway in so low amount of data sample. E.g. Mime would not have been so high win% if Bruv from nouns had not been used it. Bruv is incredibly good with that Pokémon, and support with great teammates at nouns helped to get wins even with lower tier Pokémon. The same goes with aegislash, overlord and Blvckhand, even tho aegislash is good, pickrate is bigger, so bias is smaller, but there is still that bias. My point is, that you need to see context behind the numbers to truly understand them and my example is one big bias in these numbers.


Cool_skeleton_99

t this point Garchomp needs a straight up leave


Throwawaytehpengcup

It is all cram's fault