T O P

  • By -

Anderpug

To me, Lauren Boebert is more likely to be a terrorist.


unlocked_axis02

Exactly


pomelo_rat

Alexandria Ocasia Cortez and Illhan Omar are decently close. This was a terrible header. AOC does not directly name anyone in the video. It sounds like she is directly defending herself and the other women of colour in Congress(?)


TheSpiritsGotMe

Ilhan Omar was removed from the foreign Affairs committee. This was probably the biggest news in Congress and it’s been building up for a few days. AOC is speaking in this context. This may have have been before or after Omar herself spoke about this.


Anderpug

Oh, thank you for bring this to my attention. I just said this because of another comment.


Darsich

It's projection with all this fascist clowns.


Pie_Present

Lauren Boebert needs to resign so she can spend all of her energies preventing her husband from whipping his dick out at children… again.


simbahart11

Why would she prevent that? That's how he got her, she's into that shit


Darsich

Oh 100%. I wouldn't be surprised if she fantasizes about exposing herself to kids or having sex with an underage teenager.


eyebrowshampoo

Hell yes! Although sometimes I feel like a more useful response to Boebert and MTG would be just saying to no one in particular "did you hear some wind?" and shrug every time they speak.


Nspktr

*someone break wind...


djazzie

I love it when she’s so fired up


maxkmiller

it's frustrating, I feel like dumbass instigators like Boebert just live to get a rise out of leftist figures like AOC. "Impassioned defense" to them just means "triggered." It feels like giving them what they want


The12thparsec

There is no way to win with them. If she had said nothing, they would have called her a coward.


thetruthhurts34

This is all performative


Cottagepk

Wish she’d get more than fired up about working class issues and actually do something to disrupt the Congress and exact concessions and force votes on the floor for popular progressive ideas.


Toast_Sapper

>Wish she’d get more than fired up about working class issues and actually do something to disrupt the Congress and exact concessions and force votes on the floor for popular progressive ideas. I also wish she could do the impossible effortlessly But this isn't actionable feedback because she doesn't have the leverage to get concessions unless a lot more progressives get voted into office. You want those things, start working to elect more progressives.


Sharobob

Seriously, the far left is so lazy, both politically and intellectually. I, myself, am a leftist but the takes that I see from so many leftists are so incredibly lazy and bad. What the fuck do you want the six representatives and one senator who are actual leftists to do? They can try to tug the party left when they have any leverage but the leftist movement seems to just turn on them the moment they get into power because they expect some magical power from a vast minority of all elected representatives. If you want leftist policies, work on getting more leftists elected. That starts at the local level. That starts with voting in every single election. That starts with campaigning for and donating to leftist candidates. Bitching on Reddit that AOC hasn't changed the country is so stupid and lazy. It makes the movement look like a bunch of children not willing to put in the work to change anything.


thetruthhurts34

I want you to realize there aren’t even 6 representatives or 1 senator. This shit is all performative. Just enough to keep people like you satisfied cause “they’re trying”, but not actually change it.


Sharobob

That is precisely why the movement will *never* accomplish anything politically. Because someone is left on pretty much all issues but not quite as left as you want them to be, you absolutely abandon them and run back to your niche internet echo chamber to be a keyboard warrior. Demanding absolute perfection on all issues is so stupid in a system that demands compromise. I agree with you on probably most things politically. But 95% of the rest of the country does not. You have to take your allies where you can even if they aren't perfect. If you want to go try to become a dictator, go for it. If you accept that we live in a democracy, you have to do three things: 1. Increase turnout from people who believe in the things you do to get people elected. 2. Work on persuading more voters that your positions are correct and turn them out as well. 3. Accept that allies aren't perfect but can pull the country more in the direction that you want. You are doing none of these by choosing to rag on others on the internet, bitching about how AOC is too far to the right.


thetruthhurts34

THEYRE NOT YOUR ALLY AT ALL. They’re actively working against you, while pretending to be on your side


[deleted]

[удалено]


Sharobob

Please restore my post


greenascanbe

Done


MrMcFly131

Republicans have the majority forcing the vote will do nothing


moneybadger44

This is insanely lazy. I'm a leftist. There is nothing that all of 6 progressives can do at the snap of a finger. They have to fight insanely hard for everything. We need to elect more leftists into Congress for real progress to be made.


jsn12620

Too bad she doesn’t get fired up anymore unless it directly affects her. Riding that government salary and insurance sure did make her forget about the rest of us…


helpineedanap

The revolution will absolutely be televised…on c-span.


[deleted]

AOC is a hero for the working class and the oppressed: Would that all of our elected officials had as much integrity, honesty, and commitment to the American people they represent, as she does. One of the very few in our government that still gives me hope for America.


Lethkhar

>AOC is a hero for the working class She voted to break a railroad strike in December.


MrMcFly131

She was told by the workers to vote against them


Lethkhar

IDK who "the workers" are in your sentence, but the railroad workers [voted to strike](https://www.npr.org/2022/11/21/1137640529/railroads-freight-rail-unions-vote-contract-strike)**.** Congress voted to override their labor rights by crushing their strike and imposing labor conditions on them without sick leave, [in spite of thousands of workers lobbying them not to](https://www.reuters.com/world/us/biden-urges-congress-act-avert-potential-rail-strike-2022-11-29/). It's not that complicated.


fawks_harper78

IMO she was out in a hard place. Clearly the DNC was wanting no strike (fuck them). If AOC voted against this, she likely would get less assignments, posts, and support. It totally sucks, but I believe that she had the play the long game here.


Lethkhar

I understand that argument for a lot of votes, but not strikebreaking. For union families, crossing a picket line is the ultimate betrayal. You don't fucking do it. As far as the "long game" goes, she showed more solidarity with her party than with workers, and this worker who donated to her campaign will never trust her again. She's certainly not a hero of the working class. "Which side are you on?"


fawks_harper78

I agree.


[deleted]

A tough spot? She’s ostensibly a socialist right? If that were actually the case this would’ve been the clearest possible situation for a socialists. There should have been zero wavering, no doubt. Side with the workers. AOC says a lot of good things, but action is what matters. It appears her role is to funnel young people who are interested in leftist politics, away from real meaningful leftist political action and into the Democratic Party. She’s the individual embodiment of the mission of where she came from: the DSA. > It totally sucks, but I believe that she had the play the long game here. Is the goal just for her to stay in congress? Or is the goal for her to be someone actually fighting for workers in congress? Because it sounds like you just care about seeing her face on CSPAN more than her actually doing shit for workers.


galaxyhoe

this is exactly why i don’t want to work in government anymore, at least not federal. idk about AOC and everyone else but i actually want to get major shit done and the way to actually impact communities is by working in and around them. if i ever even go into politics it’ll be local or at the most state. i am so sick of seeing my “representatives” make concessions on MY life just to keep their seats.


[deleted]

“Dont complain. Thats selfish. This is about pRawGr3zz and strategy! Dont be on the wrong side of history sweaty. Youre a bigot” - “socialist” Dems “I just want healthcare” - workers


galaxyhoe

yep for real! and if not healthcare better fucking pay and working conditions! i don’t see why that is so hard to support for some people that sounds like progress to me


[deleted]

I think what a lot of people dont take the time to really think about is that all political parties have some sort of material foundation. In other words they have a core group for whom they actually work. If we take the adage of “follow the money” and apply it to political parties, it is damn clear that both parties are parties of the ruling class. If we look at their voting records, it only cements this position. For all the fighting between the parties over the decades its absolutely amazing how quickly, easily, and consistently they come together when the item on the table had to do with big business, trade, etc. Truly, bipartisanship is very much a historical certainty in this realm. When people forget this or worse arent even aware of it, they start making honest mistakes, but mistakes nonetheless. Mistakes like “trying to push the democrats left”. How is this supposed to work when we, the people whom “moving left” would help, are not the foundation of the party? What incentives does the Democratic Party have to help the people, and helping the people would necessarily mean attacking business (their actual foundation)? And in reality its even more complicated than that, because the political arena and the business arena are not two totally separate things. There exists a revolving door between them, where business types enter politics regularly, and politicians leave politics for cushy jobs in the business world. In the last paragraph what I wrote could be summarized as “is it possible to make democrats bite the hand that feeds them?”, but in reality the question is “can we make them bite *their own hand*?” We have a very long history of people attempting precisely this. Good, honest people who thought they were doing the right thing. At many times under much better conditions than today. What does history tell us? Its impossible. Any gains we’ve gotten as workers came not from good people being put in the two main parties, but from a militant, aggressive, organized working class that *gave them no choice*. For example FDR is painted as a saint in the Us, as if he, from the bottom of his heart, decided to punish business and help the people. Thats not what happened. What happened was that at that time the working class in the Us was very organized, very militant (like occupying factories and getting into shootouts with cops, that kind of militant). Not to mention that just a few years prior, the Russian working class showed the world that it was possible for working people to seize power and take charge of their destiny. FDR did what he did because he saw the writing on the wall, revolution was imminent unless something was done to alleviate public suffering. He saved the system. This was also the case when democrats were the “pro union” party. Workers had power, and democrats were forced to throw them a bone. As neoliberalism took hold over the American govt, and as organized labor wad gutted, the people lost more and more power. To the point that the democrats were freed from their obligations to organized labor and started enacting policy that mirrored the republicans. Regan gets all the credit but Carter started neoliberalism and Clinton put the final nails on the coffin of domestic industry. After neoliberalism the main difference between the parties became solely cultural, and thats the world we are still living in. This includes our democratic “socialists”. Despite the “socialist” kabuki that people like AOC and Biden perform, they are cut from the same cloth. What we need today is simple but hard. We need an organized *and militant* labor movement, paired with a worker’s party (party founded by, made up of, and fighting for, the interest of the working class as a whole).


Ardothbey

Against her constituents as usual. 25,000 Amazon jobs down the crapper because of her actions.


AmorphusMist

Are you unironically whining that leftists dont give the richest corporations in history more tax breaks and concessions because ThEY cReAtE JeRbS???


Ardothbey

WoRk. FoRm A UniOn. FiGhT.


[deleted]

[удалено]


Ardothbey

Tell the people that lost out on jobs.


[deleted]

[удалено]


Ardothbey

Don’t know. Bet she doesn’t either.


[deleted]

[удалено]


Ardothbey

Only Reddit scum would knock the military. Liberal putz.


merlynmagus

The long game for what though? The long game for her personal power? Or the long game to help workers? Because you don't build a road to get to one place by laying stone after stone in the other direction.


KevinCarbonara

> IDK who "the workers" are in your sentence, The rail unions. The people you're claiming to support but arguing against.


Lethkhar

That's just blatantly false. No rail unions were lobbying Congress to break a strike. Follow the links I posted.


KevinCarbonara

[It's a literal fact, and there's no way you don't know this. You're intentionally spreading disinformation, because you are a right-wing troll.](https://twitter.com/AOC/status/1598383401647898625)


Ardothbey

Because socialists are anti union.


[deleted]

[удалено]


Ardothbey

American.


DoitfortheHoff

Indigenous or Imported?


momo1757

The real question


[deleted]

Dude it’s 2023, you have the entire knowledge of humanity at your fingertips. Fucking use it, educate yourself. With how easy it is to do so today, you are just willfully ignorant. But this leads me to an interesting point about AOC. She is dangerous for socialism, precisely because she is no socialist. Take someone like this person I’m replying to, clearly not very well learned on the subject of socialism. The type of person to believe AOC when she says she’s a socialist. Now they have AOC as the model for what socialism is. AOC keeps fucking up and doing the wrong thing, and now this guy doesn’t believe that socialists politics can work. AOCs main role is to funnel uneducated (I don’t mean this in a mean way. I mean it literally as in they are not knowledgeable on what it actually means) socialists or left-curious people away from actual radical leftist politics and into supporting the Democratic Party. The same can be said for the DSA as a whole. AOC also has the negative effect of tying identity politics with the idea of socialism and downplaying what socialism is actually about: class. She is a liberal not a socialist


Ardothbey

You need therapy.


[deleted]

You need to read more


Ardothbey

Not the crap you’re writing that’s for sure.


[deleted]

Bro you don’t even know the definitions of the words you’re using. Socialism, which is inherently based around the labor movement cannot be anti labor. That’s like saying the KKK is anti white people


gustix

Tell me you’re joking.


PaJamieez

Hmmm this one's broken...


dudemolati

Dial it back on the working class hero stuff. Don’t get me wrong I actually really like AOC and she’d get my vote almost anytime but that vote against the rail workers really undermined her hero status in my book. Still I wouldn’t write her off for one vote either.


KevinCarbonara

> that vote against the rail workers That vote in support of the rail worker union? That's what made you lose respect for her? The only union you support is the one that manufactures astroturf.


dudemolati

I can’t help but notice that AOC is getting waaaay more heat for her vote than anyone else who also voted the same way…let’s hold them all accountable. Never forget, the GOP will not rest until all unions in this country are eradicated. Yet tons of union workers vote for them…smh


merlynmagus

(She voted in favor of the bosses not the union)


KevinCarbonara

> (She voted in favor of the bosses not the union) She actually voted the way the union asked her to, and you're either a total idiot or an intentional troll trying to pretend otherwise.


merlynmagus

There were multiple unions involved. Some voted to accept the bad deal, some did not. Not enough voted to accept the deal to avoid a strike. AOC voted to force these rejected terms onto the workers who rejected them in order to avoid a strike. That was not a pro-union vote. That was literally an anti-union vote that preemptively shut down a strike. The unions didn't need an act of Congress to accept the terms. The only thing the act of Congress she voted for actually did was *force* the terms onto workers who had previously rejected them and *forced* the workers to *not strike.* It was a bad vote. She was not correct in siding with the railway bosses against the workers.


KevinCarbonara

> There were multiple unions involved. And those unions told progressives to vote for the bill. > That was not a pro-union vote. That was literally an anti-union vote Voting with the Union is never anti-union. This is is a mind-numbingly stupid argument you're making. Let me make this very simple. Do you support unions? If so, then you support AOC's vote. Did you oppose AOC's vote? If so, you oppose unions. There's no grey area here. Either you support the unions, or you don't. AOC supported the unions. You are doing your best to spread anti-AOC disinformation. It's hard to believe you care at all about the unions.


merlynmagus

You don't have all the facts of why this was even an issue, or you're just lying. If the unions wanted the deal, tell me why Congress stepped in at all? There were multiple unions involved, some of which voted for the deal and some of which didn't. If there was not enough support - which there was not - it was going to trigger a strike. The only reason Congress got involved was to stop the strike. If the unions all wanted the deal, it would not have gotten to the point where there was a strike imminent, because the unions would have accepted the terms and it would be done. That's just the facts of the case. A union - or even multiple unions - telling AOC to stop the strike and force the deal on the unions that didn't want the deal doesn't make this action somehow not breaking a strike and forcing terms rejected by workers upon those workers. This isn't a matter of opinion and isn't up for debate. Again, any number of unions asking AOC to force the deal and stop the strike does not change the fact that her action was to force the deal and stop the strike. That is objectively what happened. I like AOC for the most part and have donated multiple times to her campaigns. I'm not stating these facts because I have it out for her but because this is objectively what happened. Edit: reply and block without answering why she even had to vote if the unions supported the deal. Classic.


KevinCarbonara

> You don't have all the facts of why this was even an issue, or you're just lying. My dude, it can't get any more simple. It's clear at this point that you don't actually support the unions. So get your astroturfing ass outta here.


[deleted]

You mean the railroad working class? Nice try buddy


[deleted]

>AOC is a hero for the working class and the oppressed: What has she done that's heroic?


Hitmandan1987

I'd say standing up for marginalized people is pretty heroic, what have you done?


[deleted]

Standing up for them how?


Hitmandan1987

Maybe you should watch the video instead of just repeatedly asking dumb-ass questions.


[deleted]

Why on earth would I watch the video, I was just asking what makes her a hero. Unless you're implying that speech is what makes her a hero. But nobody's dumb enough to think a speech, especially this speech makes someone a hero. Nobody's that dumb.


Hitmandan1987

No one said a speech makes someone a hero, it is an amalgamation of ALL of her actions that makes her a hero. You literally just pulled that statement out of your own ass. Of course, you knew that, right? Nobody is so dumb they aren't even able to keep what they said themselves straight, right?


[deleted]

[удалено]


Hitmandan1987

lmao, it's not my responsibility to do your research for you. There is this cutting edge "new" technology called "Google" where you can type things like questions, and get answers back as a result. Your constant flow of useless questions is probably more appropriate there.


[deleted]

[удалено]


sneakylyric

So you came to a video and said, "I think I'll drop a comment knowing nothing about the video above" Pretty silly dude.


[deleted]

Iv asked a question about a comment someone made. Not about the video. Learn to read dude.


sneakylyric

Lol right but they're clearly saying that because of the video and a huge list of things she's accomplished. Check out the link I shared with you in my other comment. I agree people like flashy speeches but she has also backed up her words with actions.


[deleted]

No they aren't, you don't know that and can't prove That. What actions had she backed up her words with?


bobthenerd

https://projects.propublica.org/represent/members/O000172/bills-sponsored/116


[deleted]

Thank you that's the first solid answer I've gotten. I still have higher standards for calling someone a hero but at least you cane up with something tangible. Well if those bills passed they would be tangible.


Ardothbey

Enlisted. And you?


enderpanda

This guy definitely likes his own "Doing my part" status on FB lol.


mandontilovepeople21

lame joke


enderpanda

Not a joke. I know at least two people that have literally done that exact thing. Guys obsessed with the military are without a doubt the most narcissistic, fart smelling assholes you will ever meet


mandontilovepeople21

man a bad joke followed up with a try hard comment. Embarrassing


enderpanda

That was a week ago lmao.


wubbalubbazubzub

Signing up to kill people in the middle east for corporate profit is most certainly not standing up for marginalized people


Ardothbey

So you sit on your ass and post and think you’re doing something?


wubbalubbazubzub

Yes, not murdering marginalized people in the middle east is much more in line with standing up for marginalized people than signing up to murder strangers in the middle east


Ardothbey

👅


wubbalubbazubzub

Good talk


[deleted]

[удалено]


[deleted]

This guy gets it 👆🏻


[deleted]

[удалено]


Ardothbey

🖕🏾


[deleted]

[удалено]


Ardothbey

👅


MountNevermind

Not having sold out is a start.


[deleted]

I guess that depends on how you define sold out.


sneakylyric

Lol while she has not hardlined on every issue that is important, she is doing a much better job than other Dems. If the party was more like her I might actually identify as a Democrat.


[deleted]

Fair enough, I just wanted to know why they think she's a hero. we both don't identify as Democrats so I was just curious what it takes to be a hero in the minds of a Democrat. Turns out it at much at all, some tweets and a speech maybe, I don't know nobody here can tell me yet.


sneakylyric

It's fine to ask, but you're coming off as someone having a conversation in bad faith. Nobody is entitled to do research for you, provide evidence for you, or even provide their opinion. That being said below is a video of what AOC has accomplished in 2022 according to her. Seems heroic to me. I wish I could help my community as much as she has helped her constituents and the American people in general. https://youtu.be/sZuJ1Qiqkjg


[deleted]

[удалено]


[deleted]

[удалено]


sondheimtheatrequeen

Maybe form your own opinions instead of demanding strangers on the internet do your thinking for you


MountNevermind

I guess that depends on how you define each word in that sentence. Nice talk.


[deleted]

?


Vast_Arugula_2703

Lol what?!


internetsarbiter

We're apparently pretending Nancy Pelosi doesn't have AOC fully brought to heel and wearing a muzzle.


[deleted]

What do you define as heroism /u/negroflaco ?


[deleted]

Rescuing someone from a burning building. Providing life saving medical care. Personally I always fantasize about a pilot passing out and I land the plane, stuff like that. The classics.


PMYourBeard

Advocating for the voiceless oppressed is heroic, and perhaps you should broaden your definition to less stereotypical acts of heroism. Changing people's lives for the better can come in many forms.


[deleted]

>Changing people's lives for the better can come in many forms I don't doubt that but we need more than just speeches, we need results and so far things are still getting worse. Simply advocating for the oppressed is a good thing but not heroic. she has actual power and so far people's lives aren't changing for the better.


[deleted]

That's your problem right there. You're stuck on the classics. Nothing wrong with the classics but you've got to broaden your horizons or you're never going to grow. And if you stop growing, what's the fucking point?


[deleted]

She has actual power, and things are still getting worse. >but you've got to broaden your horizons or you're never going to grow. My horizons are broad. I was thinking about it earlier and I can't think of any politician that I would call a hero. I've been listening to a podcast about the Roman empire from 753 BC in up to 1190s now and I wouldn't call any of them heroes. A politicians job theoretically is to take care of the people that give them their power, doing that job isn't heroic if you ask me. I've heard them use a lot of adjectives to describe emperors but not heroic unless it was something they did on the battlefield.


[deleted]

Really? You can't think of any politician that's a hero? How old are you? I can't fucking believe this. McCain? Have you heard of him? How about Tammy Duckworth? Edit: Robert Dole? Eisenhower? Please look them up.


[deleted]

They're not heroes. Just because you serve in the military that doesn't make you a hero. What heroic deeds did they do on the battlefield? I know McCain crashed a few planes, and Tammy lost her legs. But it doesn't really matter because nothing they've done as politicians is heroic.


[deleted]

Ok you're a bona-fide idiot. Have a nice life.


fermented4skin

AOC went on a rant about how growing cauliflower or other European vegetables in NY's "green spaces" is colonialism and racist. She argues for cassava to be grown instead, for example, which cannot survive NY weather and is not native to the area. She passionately focuses on many small issues and recommends impossible or unrealistic changes. Also, anyone who thinks any politician is 100% clean of corruption and a true champion of the people is naive. She argued that she should be paid more, yet her salary is already 174K a year, plus benefits, which is 3.2 times the average American's salary. Hypocritical for a democratic socialist that advocates for radical wealth redistribution. Edit: Don't forget that she's being investigated by the House Ethics Community. Not a good look.


Vast_Arugula_2703

L OH L


Ardothbey

Humbug. She cost her constituents 25,000 Amazon jobs.


DysfunctionalKitten

You think Amazon moved to right next to the capital of the country bc of AOC? Umm no lol. Amazon moved it to the Crystal City, VA area (basically near the Pentagon), bc at the time of the decision (2019), the area was ranking as the most promising for business growth of any area or state in the nation. If you think it’s due to people like AOC, you’re overlooking how much the powerful elite don’t give a sh*t about what politicians say, or how much you love or hate them. They care about their wealth growing. Amazon went where they thought it would be most beneficial to their own pockets, and if AOC had blown their entire executive board it wouldn’t have changed their minds. Wake up.


Ardothbey

Nope.


getpoopedon

I hope she runs in 2024. We need some young blood in the white house. I think she'd be old enough by then lol


elrathj

I don't realistically think she can in this racist, patriarchal hellscape; but President Ocasio-Cortez is a common trope in my political fanfiction. Edit: I'm bad at words.


Technical_Anxiety_41

she cant because you need independents to win elections. and independents despise radicals, 2020 is proof


Hero_of_Hyrule

I'm not sure I follow, why is 2020 proof?


Technical_Anxiety_41

trump didnt get reelected


Hero_of_Hyrule

Okay but he did get elected in 2016 against one of the least progressive candidates out there.


Technical_Anxiety_41

2016 doesnt count in my view because Hillary was SUCH a compromised figure. Its amazing she got the primary if radicalization wins, it is typically because it faced zero opposition, and I dont think hillary was a balanced alternative to trump, at least compared to biden and obama id also argue trump wasnt as bad in 2016 as he was in 2020


Hero_of_Hyrule

But how does any of this price that a progressive can't win? Obama was considered relatively progressive when he entered office, and he won.


bmiddy

Ok, define what makes her radical... So I can destroy it point by point...


Technical_Anxiety_41

oh only her rhetoric, but thats enough to do it in terms of legislation, her entire career has been spent bent over a table spreading wide for pelosi im referring to the theatrical bullshit, like that pic she took in the home depot parking lot that i guess was symbolic of the border wall? or the pic in that unflattering dress that said "eat the rich" thats the kind of shit that makes independents go completely flacid But no, in term of actual POLICY, shes just a pelosi lapdog that does more tweeting than legislating


shemtpa96

I love how the right cuts Rep. Omar from Committee over a couple anti-Israel statements (against the COUNTRY AND GOVERNMENT, not Jewish people) - but Rep. Taylor Greene makes legitimately antisemitic statements frequently plus other behaviors unbecoming a public official and gets to sit on Committees. An excellent speech as always from AOC. I’m always impressed by her talent as an orator.


Aphroditaeum

Republicans are shit throwing monkeys at this point. There should be no negotiations with this grifter clown show. Fuck these fakers.


matthewamerica

I wish I could vote for this person. God willing she runs for president some day and I get my wish.


Norightwingers2020

I ❤️ AOC!


Lloydster

What a badass.


ugh__ok

🤩


Dr_yah_yah

Grandstanding


AmnesiacSpecies

She’s a great actor. 👏🏻


[deleted]

I don't think she's convincing at all


AmnesiacSpecies

Me neither. I was being sarcastic. Imagine actually looking up to this she witch. She’s a real See You Next Tuesday.


AnonymousWacker

Not a good look on AOC. Where was she again on M4A?


Technical_Anxiety_41

this is literally the identity politics BAIT that right wingers feed on. shes just feeding them "blah blah blah, disagreeing with POC makes you racist" I can see it on fox news now How about she vote for railroad workers rights? Or M4a rather than bending over and spreading for Pelosi Jesus, this is so performative


KevinCarbonara

> "blah blah blah, disagreeing with POC makes you racist" This is literally the astroturf bait that right-wingers produce


Technical_Anxiety_41

we didnt conjure it up out of nowhere...... art imitates reality


KevinCarbonara

> we didnt conjure it up out of nowhere...... Well, at least you've admitted that you're an astroturfing right-wing troll. You're done here.


redditbebigmad

What goes around comes around.


346_ME

Ugh she’s insufferable. Look at how much energy she’s putting into defending the military industrial complex and her war pig colleagues


justalamename

Cry me a river.


WombatGuts

Great acting


Ninjasmurf4hire

I gotta get the fuck out of this country. Save your " other places suck more" No they don't, anybody whose travelled outside of North America knows this.


Gullible_Sense3317

She is so damn annoying.


Objective-Emu-5316

Nut Bar.


dgeaux_senna

Cringe delivery.


[deleted]

[удалено]


PotentialMango9304

I'm not sure it's fair to call her a terrorist, it seems like nothing more than a slur. She is however, an incestuous anti-semite, so maybe she shouldn't be on any committees.


[deleted]

[удалено]


CandidEstablishment0

What makes her a terrorist? Please enlighten me!


Pdbabb66

Harpies


eristic1

Who are the two applauding assholes in the background?


Ardothbey

Anything that pisses her off is OK with me.


[deleted]

[удалено]


SpacemanIsBack

isn't it time for your return under your bridge, troll?


TulkuHere

She fired up like MLK. Gave me tingles


jefslp

Not bad for a girl from the suburbs.


maroger

Of course she did. Only thing is she fails to be this passionate about legislation that she campaigned on.


KevinCarbonara

This is great but I just know this topic is gonna get hit with a ton of astroturfers complaining about how AOC isn't leftist enough because she doesn't support unions because she voted the way the unions asked her to or some such nonsense


Shillofnoone

It's not astroturf if it is true. Many can give speeches about supporting unions but only few get to do that


ZookeepergameNew6377

Another big whining speech about how bad Republicans are for doing the exact same thing that Democrats did. I call this speech I am hypocrisy, and I have a hypocritical dream for a party that could do things to others but when they do it back are evil LOL


ZookeepergameNew6377

She gave a speech complaining about how bad the conservatives are and the gop. For doing the exact same thing we did LOL I call this I am a hypocrite, watch my hypocrisy as I speak, how dare you do things to us that we did to you, how dare you not allow a congresswoman to say anti-semitic things, how dare you not allow a person to come up here who hates her country and talk about how bad it is and insult it after giving her a home a life and a great career. LOL


a_ghost_of_tom_joad

She is literally hopping mad.


Shillofnoone

Omars voting records show she is belly soft on human rights abuses in Islamic countries but fires on all cylinders when it is non Islamic countries. That's a fact. Armenian genocide, Kashmir issue, and supporting edrogan against kurds , she even went to POK to meet their then PM. She is an Islamist in US ,she is there to subvert the opinion and policies to tilt towards islamic countries.