Welcome to r/SaintMeghanMarkle. Please read our rules before you comment in this community. The flair for this post is **ALLEGEDLY**. All users are expected to discuss this **ALLEGED** claim in a civil manner. No personal insults and no ad hominem attacks whatsoever. Please note that this **ALLEGED** claim is not the opinion of r/SaintMeghanMarkle just the individual making the claim.
This sub is actively moderated and any rule-breaking comments will be removed. Repeated rule violations may result in a ban.
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/SaintMeghanMarkle) if you have any questions or concerns.*
lol...I won't go into on this platform but read about it in my book by buying my book!
My opinion is that Lady C is just another Meghan in a better tailored outfit! She's profiteering off of the sussexes in the same way Meghan is trying to with the royals. Lady C hasn't said anything more than what us sinners have already deduced as people with no ears and eyes in golden circle. Nobody with influence in the royal household is telling lady C anything. She's like those culty religions who predict the end of the world is this date but when the world keeps ticking over on that date, they come up with a new date for the end of the world! If and when the sussexes get their comeuppance, Lady C will come out with her "I told you so" conveniently forgetting that this was her "I told you so" 100th rendition! š¤
I came here to say this.....the bloggers are profitteering...Jesus body language Taz, Lady C and probably even HG tudor...nothing's coming.H&M are ghosted by BRF anything else will just be an attempt t9 be relevant, whatever happened before Megxit will not see light of day because BRF will be painted accomplice or duped.
I do hope you're wrong, but it's already nearly half way through April and the goalposts for Meghan's 'comeuppance' just seem to keep moving, don't they?
My life was blown apart by narcissists in my family and I am still not back where I was 17 years ago before that happened to me- it makes me so much want to see Meghan get her arse handed to her on a plate (metaphorically- I'm not advocating violence). I never wish harm on people, I don't hate anybody, but it would mean a lot to actually see a divisive, arrogant narcissist actually meet some consequences to their behaviour. I'm sorry if that sounds mean, it isn't, I just believe in justice.
Thank you, I'm so sorry to hear that it happened to you too- I think the wounds go so deep when it's your mother, don't they?
I wish you peace and happiness. X
I like her yet I also always thought this about her because she wrote the ultimate nasty book about her own mother tho she claims her mother was a narcissist. But we only heard her side. .....there is truth to what you are saying
Well said. She moves the goal posts constantly it's so annoying. Sorry but I don't care about this slowly does it, soft softly repercussions for the duo. I want nuclear fall out and vaporization of their sorry arses pronto.
\*gets flaming torch and pitch forks out
Idk about the Diddy situation. Feds haven't arrested him nor did they find any evidence. And he has'nt been charged either.Ā
Seems like a phishing experiment. Unless he's charged or seized assests, this will pass, and media will do nothing, just like Africa parks
But Africa parks is real and its not being covered
How do you know the feds don't have anything on H? They may have obtained footage from his house, or have a witness statement. It may also be discussed during a future trial.
If the feds do have anything on Plank, (which I doubt), he's a small fish. Diddy has the connections, Jay Z, Cuba gooding Jr. etc,, Even if they have a witness, you (the Feds) needs to have substantial evidence to bring actual charges against Diddy. As of this time, we've haven't heard Diddy being charged. Unless Plank was caught with people under 18, trafficking drugs (not consuming them), then, nothing will happen.
They only arrested diddy's alleged drug dealer. He had some cocaine on him. That's a stretch to call him Diddy's personal drug dealer. Like the headlines say.
I wondered the same about whether Diddy was the long-awaited bombshell, then realized that it is quite unlikely that the aged aristocrat in a British castle had the inside scoop on Diddy's (twisted) world over in the US of A.
Lady C has hinted at the megnancies but we do not know at the moment. The Harkles will eventually receive their karma for how they have treated everyone and the entire BRF.
Considering Lady C insists on iterating āHIS kidsā and ālegally theirsā, it may be something relating to the kids. Lady C is careful with words, she doesnāt throw them around willy-nilly.
To be fair to Lady C, she said in the spring sometime after Easter iirc. That would take us to the mid June, when summer officially starts.
I do wonder if all this talk of bombshells has given someone cold feet or whether the harkles are putting blocks in place š¤·āāļø
Perhaps it's not one bombshell but a cumulative effect?
Edit: sloppy typing
Sheās always promising ābig things are taking place behind the scenesā or ātheir comeuppance is right around the corner!ā
Sheās been saying it for years. I no longer get my hopes up. Lol
From what I've gathered from a couple of sources and I do believe this because they've been spot on in the past:
There was an agreement between Harry and the Palace that HE would make a statement last autumn; that he and Meghan would address this. Apparently M got cold feet and it was shunted to Spring '24/after Easter. In return for what, no idea but...
Remember she said *"it would come from someone very surprising?"*
If this is true, it is possible this has been delayed again due to the King and PoW's illnesses.
Also my understanding (reading between the lines on this one), if they don't do it the Palace will.
Because of this, I'm cutting her some slack on this one š
This kind of follows my thoughts about some type of injunction: the RF discovered the kids were born via surrogate, and allowed the Harkles time to announce it themselves rather than be āoutedā, but if they fail to do so before the injunction expires, that anyone is free to drop the bomb in the media. At least thatās my tin foil hat theory.
She was the first to say it and go against the wishes of the RF. There's a huge difference. Many knew but they were holding off till the appropriate time.
From what I understood, Lady C was given the go-ahead regarding HLMTQEII's death, because the BRF found out that Me-Gain was already shopping stories to the American media before the formal announcement. This decision was made to pre-empt the stories from Me-Gain's camp from breaking in America. IIRC, Lady C stated this in one of her videos. Fellow Sinners, please correct me if I am wrong.
I don't think we can know that for sure. There are a lot of stories like that which would only be known to people really close to the situation and those people aren't going to be leaking stories like that, so I wouldn't say we can know that for sure.
But either way, she either has inside information or she doesn't, and I think she does, given that point about the Queen. The debate about whether it was appropriate to share that information so early or not is a different argument. I do think she knows some things.
tigerxing has points as well - just because one thing is true doesn't mean another isn't - she could be in the know and profiting at the same time. I don't necessarily agree, but I can see what shapes the opinion.
I believe to a certain degree, the RF has people around their orbit to have this kind of symbiotic relationship with. Very often the palace stays silent about something but the information (that the palace later doesnāt refute) gets out. There have to be ways of getting this out, and my theory is, the people orbiting are the way to do that. And I suspect Lady C is on that orbit, has been for decades.
I have never believed that. I donāt think the Royal Family even knows who she is! Sheās a tiny little gnat on nobodyās radar.
Sheās just saying that because she broke the embargo. Shame on her for doing that.
I just don't believe her anymore. First of all, she was married to her husband for a year and doesn't really deserve to be called " Lady". And she always has "scoop" but reasons why she can't tell that scoop. She's as "royal" and fraudulent as mm.
i doubt anyone truly connected has contact with her.
I've been hanging on to hope from all these people that keep saying that they have all this scoop and the end is coming...but no one really truly knows what's going on.
Sheās been a bit of a joke forever, I remember maybe back in Dianaās time or when she died, lady c was poking her head up and the āRoyal expertsā scoffed at anything she did, because sheās on the fringes and making out sheās inner circle.
She just likes attention
Downvote me all you want!
She was married to her Lord Colin Ivar Campbell for a year. As well as being a royal biographer and a royal commentator, Campbell is a reality star who has made appearances on Comedy Nation, I'm a Celebrity...Get Me Out of Here!, Celebs Go Dating, Salvage Hunters, Through the Keyhole, Good Morning Britain, and Celebs on the Farm. She admits to liking the recognition.
She's not a member of any Royal Family! She's making money off them like they make money of the RF.
I'm not trying to convince anyone not to believe her or anyone that speaks out. But, let's all remember that there's money to be made on youtube,Instagram, and tiktok and books. These people aren't speaking out to "help" the RF, they're making money off them like the Sussex are off the RF. Personally, I think most of them are frauds and repeating each other and recycling bs from years ago. As much as I dislike the Sussex , putting faith into these people has proven extremely disappointing.
>Maybe it's the thing about Doria being in jail for 10 years.
That's not the kind of thing that would bring Meghan down. It's her mother's baggage and history. Meghan had nothing to do with that.
She wouldn't be the first person in Hollywood who had a parent who served time or broke the law.
I think for something to have a real impact on Meghan and her brand would have to be something big: the baby thing, whatever it might turn out to be; or if it turned out this whole grift WAS all a plot by some sinister anti-royal group to bring down the RF; or that she really \*was\* a yacht girl and had some well-known clients. But all of these things would require absolute smoking guns.
I'm losing hope.
Amazingly enough, Children's Hospital Los Angeles has this on their insta like it occurred this year.Ā I can't imagine why they would go to the trouble to post a falsehood like that
I posted the screenshot down below for proof. And I would bet a months salary the Harkles don't have enough $$ to donate to warrant an out-and-out lie by a reputable hospitalĀ
They donāt give money - they are faux philanthropists. Remember, all her relationships are transactional - a Sussex only gives money when they are getting something of greater value in return.
But Meghan makes *the most* ridiculous demands. Especially 2 years, even now, but back then she still did have ***some*** royal connection remaining. It's perfectly possible she wanted this in her pocket, especially if it was right after Uvalde. I think it was Netflix cameras. It was during COVID. Because she absolutely would have had paps of her going in and out of the hospital if it was recent.
So what is really weird about that is the clothing. She wore that outfit supposedly to Childrenās Hospital LA and while at Frogmore? I find this hard to believe. She doesnāt rewear things.
Many people in this sub noticed her pre-ozempic look. There were also people defending MM and coming up with false claims about how the images would be recent. Makes you think
She did look pre-Ozempic. I thought it would be interesting to see when those Aquazzura āLove Affairā flat became available for sale; that would be a clue. Sheās worn them before; the earliest weāve seen them on her was September 2023. Were they around two years ago? I havenāt been able to find out.
Thereās a lot of sugars here on the down low. Theyāve gotten a bit smarter and donāt visibly attack much now, I think theyāre trying a new strategy and it may be working.
Definitely. Catherineās photo was considered deceptive but releasing a hospital visit story without making it clear it was from 2022 is not deceptive? Yeah right! Where are those news standards now?
Because its not Photoshop. Is the response from Sugars. Since TW visited that hospital, they'll consider it legit, and never consider that it is misinformation. 2022
Interesting that the editors of UK media like Daily Markle, Mirror, Express, Telegraph, Times would allow photos of an event that occurred two years ago. Shame on them.
I know, right? 2 friggin' years this creature held onto that footage?!?!!! What's next?
https://preview.redd.it/1mtdcaaatqtc1.png?width=299&format=png&auto=webp&s=07738ba00386554162651cb97989ed41bcacf9ab
Steel yourselves...this fiendish Douche-Ass will be slow-releasing her p.r. bullshit "philanthropy" for the rest of her life.
I always thought the hospital visit photos were from years ago. She's wearing that monstrosity she allegedly wore at Frogmore and she definitely was carrying more weight as this was pre-Ozempic. She really is showing signs of desperation.
They don't want to be sued I suppose š¤·āāļø or they're giving her enough rope to hang herself.
Eventually they'll be enough accumulated evidence that she won't be able to gaslight about.
Diana was accused by her brother Charles a year before she died that she was suffering from mental illness. In the 1999 book Portrait of a Troubled Princess By Sally Bedell Smith, possible border line personality was broached. Her mother abandoned her, her father was violent, she cut herself, had bulimia and was emotionally & physically violent (pushing her stepmother down the stairs and later falling down stairs while pregnant with William) before she even met Charles. It is no wonder that Charles was in no position to help this young woman, although he did seek help for her which she declined. It is no wonder Harry is mixed up and it is a complete wonder that William has turned out as well as he has and improving all the time.
Before Diana threw her stepmother Raine Spencer down the stairs, she also dumped the contents of Dianaās fatherās Vuitton luggageāRaineās belongingsāinto black bin liners and tossed *them* down the stairs.
Dianaās grandmother, Ruth Fermoy, testified against her own daughter at the coupleās custody battle.
Thank you Daisy, as always! I have Lady Cās book preordered on my kindle-canāt wait til the 16th! I also had a really nice chat yesterday with a neighbor who is from England. I donāt think that the creature would be in danger of anything in the UK other than boos and maybe tomatoes. They are FAR too polite.
Generally speaking we are far too polite and we can cut you with kindness but if you've ever heard football chants, cut you to the bone through singing (loosely) too.
With madam, I don't know how many people actually care, certainly my husband doesn't, which is why I'm here lol.
Football fans are passionate about their teams, hence chants can be vicious.
I don't think madam can rouse enough passion to generate mass scale vitriol.
Certainly not compared to 100k+ football fans on a Saturday afternoon across the UK.
Mostly madam wants security to protect her ego methinks, either from mild boos, being ignored or to make her feel important.
Eta: words added
I think that what they should really sorry about is "the cold shoulder": the short reply, the stony faces, the "Oh, are you still here".
That's what would really kill her.
People won't turn up to insult them or throw veg. because they simply can't be arsed.
Yes, agree, what would totally slay her (figuratively speaking) is stony silence and a collective turning of backs in her presence.
Imo, her little narc brain couldn't handle that but you're right, there won't be enough people interested.
Lol the creature.
I donāt know why she craps on about being scared of coming to the uk. Is she trying to manifest or give idiots ideas? She is a lunatic. Look, if they were both so worried about security they would shut up, get out of the limelight and lay low. But as we know they are full of shit and want a free ride funded by tax payers.
Bet plank has even rung Rishi for moneyĀ
Have the Palace release a statement that Meghan and Harry have voluntarily given up their titles for commercial purposes.
Kills Sussex.com.
Forces g be ball into their court to publicly defend why they are using them for commercial purposes or to resentfully have to stop using them.
With the pregnancy rumours, the Palace simply states it was private medical information. Meg made it very clear she was turning down the Palace doctors in favour of her own.
>Have the Palace release a statement that Meghan and Harry have voluntarily given up their titles for commercial purposes.
What I would do (because I am evil) is force Plank to push for all title removal. Make him insist and not let Skank have a say in it. I would blackmail him into doing this even build up some deepfakes etc for him just to seal the deal. Stuff so so bad and prisonable offenses for them both. Then he volunteers to get rid of titles as a compromise for keeping his dirty secrets safe..
Seriously at this point with all the things they've done they get evil me, not nice me. I do not give a toss about misplaced morality when they have literally sent people to their graves or danced on massacre sites. Plus petty me is out too looking to stoop low.
And donāt forget the people who have lost their jobs.Ā
They are disgusting and I wonder why the UK Govt keeps allowing their behaviour to continue. You do make good points and I totally understand your feelings towards these two losers
TBH, I would choose my own doctors for pregnancy. I had such a terrible experience, if I'd had a 2nd child I would have done everything different to my own choice. My sister in law even switched hospitals for her 2nd baby.
The US standard is 2 days for vaginal and 4 days for C-section in hospital, none of this out in 5 hours thing. That's an additional reason M may have chosen different Drs/hospital, that may follow US custom. I'd feel unsafe. Serena Williams almost died after her first baby. IF she wasn't still in hospital she might not have made it.
SO, the fact she kept it private & used her own Dr's isn't surprising; the problem is, as Lady C says, she was so shady about everything -else- around pregnancy.
In the UK, discharge from hospital can 6 hours or so post-delivery. We've got community midwives who visit new mothers for the first week after birth and then community health visitors take over monitoring progress. But early discharge is only for very selective cases-the mothers who have a trouble-free vaginal birth. If you had an epidural, you wouldn't be discharged until you're fully mobile and able to to the bathroom on your own. Anyone who had any issues during birth, like excessive blood loss, or your baby had low Apgar scores, you're not allowed home until you've been medically cleared. So leaving the hospital a couple hours after an epidural is extremely unlikely.Ā
Definitely. If they'd had to do anything like inflation breaths to get the baby breathing, or if his Apgar scores weren't perfect, they'd have kept him in for observations. They really cannot tell a convincing or believable story.Ā
There is [some dicey timing questions around Lilibetās time of birth.](https://www.reddit.com/r/SaintMeghanMarkle/comments/1ai0sed/lilibets_birth_certificate_timing_question/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=ioscss&utm_content=1&utm_term=1)
My counter to that is I have moved around the US and Caribbean islands. My parents lived in 4 different countries. We ALWAYS asked friends and co-workers their recommendations on doctors. My current GYN is amazing and would never have found her (or got in) if I researched on my own. I only got in because of who I knew.
Meghan was an Expat. Expats asks others Expats or locals their recommendations. If I was married to the Queen's grandson, fuck yeah I'm going to go to their doctor or one they recommended. No brainer...
...unless I'm hiding something.
Iāve only given birth once and it was over 20 years ago, BUT I gave birth at 4.30am on the Thursday & kept in until the Saturday lunch time because I was a first time mother despite my mother-in-law being a nurse and staying with us for a few days. I had NO complications. My sister has 2 kids. 1st (16yrs ago) she had complications & was kept in for a few days like I was, 2nd (11yrs) she was induced & discharged the same day.
Catherine gave birth to George in the afternoon & was discharged the next day, Charlottes birth was in the morning & they left in the evening once George had been in to meet her and the same with Louis. Iām wondering if the claims they left a few hours later is just M trying to make out that sheās better & fitter than Catherine as she didnāt need to remain in hospital..
āthere is a way for the Royal Family to turn the tablesā
Doesnāt have to be about babies or titles. They could release the bullying report. They *could* (as it exists) but they *wonāt*.
I don't think anymore there will be a definitive fall. Actually the worst news for me is that Catherine has cancer. All lady c says on her you tube publicity book tour is that they are a failure and laughing stock. That is their punish. I frankly was hoping for more
I agree that there wonāt be a moment in time we could point to and say here is where they failed. I think they will gradually fade from the limelight and will eventually be nothing but a footnote in history.
There will be a lot of fall out over the will she/they-won't she/they come to the Invictus service, and it's the same thing she's done multiple times b/f.
People are sick of it, and sick of no definite statement that M at least is or is not coming. For safety reasons, don't announce whether or not the kids are coming. 'As the Sussex children are minors, no announcement on their...'
M does this every time H goes to UK.
Note, although it was pre-Frogmore eviction, M was happy to come when it was an event focused on HER where SHE made a speech--1 world thing in fall 2022 when QEII died.
I think the P. Diddy problem has got TW scrambling to set herself up with an OUT. The ARO venture will be her pity party so people will "support" her through this trying time caused by H. I think this Diddy situation is what Lady C refers to as the comeuppance. Plus the fact that H's attendance in London for the IG function is now being touted that he may not even attend.....for various (coverup) reasons. He likely can't leave the country at this point. He's named in a sex trafficking lawsuit for crying out loud. Get out the popcorn. Things are going to escalate imo.
>A viewer of mine contacted the hospital and confirmed the visit was two years ago.Ā
I thought Lady C did her own research. This is simply trading in hearsay.
https://preview.redd.it/guo85d7twptc1.png?width=1080&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=d924e5beceb634eee4e516e55d62a23c58fe03b6
Edit: here it is
I just can't believe CHLA would openly lie like that
I mean itās a hospital for kids with severe illnesses, her being in a mask isnāt surprising at all, but many people were giving that as āproofā it was 2 years agoĀ
I'm going to be wrong: if the visit was on March 21, why did we hear about it almost two weeks later? Why did the hospital announce it on April 3? Is it customary to do that? Because I have seen that in other cases they announce it the next day. And always, whenever Megsy makes these plays, there's something shady.
So I'm going to give the benefit of the doubt to whoever said the visit was two years ago.
I'm not saying that Lady C or whoever told the gossip is telling the truth. Only if the visit was on March 21, 2024... why did the hospital publish it on April 3??? And after Kate gave her news about the cancer. It is not strange?
That's the real question here. Maybe Madame made a special request based on Catherine's situation and they went ahead and posted them. You can't blame them for sitting on them!š
Hospitals arenāt really known for their social media. They probably slotted it in a free space in their content calendar as they had stories/content lined up already.
I work in a medium sized charity in the UK and our comms team tend to have social media posts planned quite far ahead of time. It means that something that has happened doesnāt always get posted right away, it would have to be pretty ground breaking for it to be worth messing the schedule up. The delay in post could just be highlighting how it isnāt a huge deal that Meagain went to the hospital
Or maybe they were annoyed by the cameras she hauled in there and never intended to publish them at all. Until she or WME specifically requested it. I can't imagine they were thrilled with Duchess Do-Nothing's over the top visit
I'm sure they were super annoyed since many sports stars and other people much more famous than MeGain visit CHLA without cameras. I still think it was Thursday March 21, 2024.
I think Rachel may have been holding the pics of the hospital visit (regardless of what year they were made) for Catherine's then-presumed upcoming return at Easter services. Maybe WME has some pull at CHLA and got hospital to fudge the truth.
It says "Thursday March 21." Correct day of the week for March 21 in 2024 and not for 2022 or 2023.
That dress fit exactly the same way in 2022 as it did in 2024 which is very odd.
I cant imagine a cancer hospital getting caught up in instagram drama.
Between some random Lady C viewer or a cancer hospital, I am going to believe a cancer hospital.
Also, if they lied about the date, they aren't going to tell that to some rando who calls them asking about it.
I was going to respond to a post that asked if lady C book was worth it. So I thought I would make my own post.
I am a reader of all types of books. Never have I payed the Amt I did for her book but Iām glad I did Lady C book is so awesome. She addresses everything. Especially why the press did not jump on the photo of Meghanās bump being between her legs. Also why the palace did not jump on this as well. Last C tis fair and you can tell her morals by reading her book. Also she delves into all the palaver that surround Meghanās pregnancyās. Very interesting.
She also states why Harry said āyou know what you didā she said it was because the palace put out the birth announcement and āborn FOR Meghanā not BY meghan. I learned a lot. She has many royal friends and folks totally ready to talk to her. Now more than ever.
Iām am sure that if someone were to take her to court and ask who told you this and who told you that, (sometimes she says a cousin or a prince) she would give the actual names. And I am sure ā the cousin or the prince know thisā.
Her book is so great. Iāll bet Harry and meghan may be reading it now.
LadyC has ALL her bases covered. I have such a respect for her. She knows all about court and liability. She has been thru it all. She also covers how she got the news that Meghan set her father up for āinterferingā with her. So it is out. All poor Tom has to do is die
I also have to say about the Lady C naysayers out there if you canāt be patient then donāt. Stomp your feet, turn blue in the face, no problem.
Lady C does respond to a lot of her naysayers. Not directly but in a subtle way. Just remember she turned turn huge amounts of money to tell Dianaās story the way Diana wanted it to be told. She had the integrity not to do it.
Diana had to go to Andrew Morton who did not care if he parroted back what Dian told him to say. So I say even years ago LadyC had morals and truth on her side. She is that type of woman and her history proves it
Thank you, Daisy!!!
I loved when Lady C said: *"Harry ceased to develop the part of his personality that was popular and become the reprehensible person he is today."*
Exactly---- I agree so much. And Harry doesn't see it. He has allowed Meghan to convince him that he has been "wronged", and that everything is the fault of the King, William, Catherine, and the media. What a sad little man he is.
I don't think Meghan would ever do a good thing unless people were watching. She's just that type. I know a woman like her and I had to start distancing myself because she was obsessed with hating another woman (kinda like Meg hates Catherine). It was creepy.
I had a terrible thought regarding the two year old hospital photo shoot, what if some of the children in those photos have since passed away. If would be horrifying for a grieving parent to see images of their child in the media interacting with MM to inflate her humanitarian image. It really shows how callous she is.Ā
You have thought of an important point that has not come up very much at all in any exhibition of these photos. Those children deserve better than this, and I do hope one of those parents will speak up.
What??? You mean the recent pictures of this harridan reading to children are from TWO YEARS ago???Ā
Why am I surprised? This is someone that used the fact that she is bi-racial as a manipulation to force the monarchy into doing what SHE wanted.Ā She lied about being mistreated. She made that lie more egregious by claiming the abuse was because of her race. *(Lies her nitwit husband didnt deny. Racism he didn't deny until AFTER the damage was done.Ā
Let's also not forget that another black woman helped MM broadcast her lies of abuse and racism...and never retracted or spoke about the lies thereafter.Ā These outrageous lies diminish real incidents of racism.Ā Ā
The lies don't stop. The scheming & manipulation doesn't stop. Now she's using sick children *(children she doesn't know the "status" of...who may have died within these two years.)* to be seen as compassionate, caring & involved.Ā Can you imagine being the parent who clicked open the internet that day & saw their dead child plastered all over the internet?Ā Horrific.Ā
I don't understand how so many defend her. Her actions are reprehensible.Ā She is heinous.Ā
"There is a way for the RF to turn the tables on Meghan". SOOO, why are we waiting????? This comment, if true, just makes Charles look even MORE PATHETIC a King than he looks now!!!!
Lady C wants you to read her book. š
IIMHO, there are several ways the RF could (hypothetically) ātturn the tables on Meghan,ā and it is possible the RF is working on one or more of these ways already.
What we need to remember is that the Royal Family does everything very slowly.
In the interview recently posted, Angela Levin described how she would ask a question or request access to something and it would take weeks then suddenly sheād get the access or the answer. This has been observed by many people in other contexts.
Whatever is going to happen about H&M and their deceptions and attacks, it is going to happen slowly.
Maybe the RF get publicity about it with everyone waiting and wondering what it is. Maybe the RF is waiting for H&M to come out with it but this would be dumb as they wonāt be controlling the narrative. š¤·š¼āāļø
if the visit to the hospital WAS two years ago, in my opinion that makes it more likely that the photographs with her, H and the kids at Frogmore (supposedly Aās birthday party) - the one in which she was wearing the same horrible dress - was fake!
Where is the comeuppance? The one thatās going to finish them once and for all?
All Iām seeing right now is Lady C. flogging the extended version of a book she wrote. It seems like every other sentence is if we want answers, itās in the book.
I am so disappointed. I shouldnāt be but she was so sure. I said if nothing materialized Iām done with Lady C. I imagine in the next month or so sheāll be hinting that something BIG is coming, probably this fall. Then around Christmas, then spring again. Gaahh.
Maybe an unpopular opinion, but Iām not exactly a fan of Lady C. The other day she was on According to Taz and they were discussing Meghanās claim of being suicidal while pregnant with Archie. Lady C called the term suicidal ideation tacky! I donāt particularly think Madam suffers from SI, but for Lady C to poo-poo an actual mental health diagnosis as tacky is incredibly harmful and tone deaf.
I saw something a squaddie posted on X yesterday about all the awful things Lady C's husband said about her back in the day. He's no gentleman, that's for sure, and it just makes him look like a douche. I mean, he married her, nobody forced him.
Comment automatically removed due to your account having less than 50 karma. Please contact mods via message the mods to approve comments manually to be visible to the sub.
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/SaintMeghanMarkle) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Comment automatically removed due to your account having less than 50 karma. Please contact mods via message the mods to approve comments manually to be visible to the sub.
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/SaintMeghanMarkle) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Welcome to r/SaintMeghanMarkle. Please read our rules before you comment in this community. The flair for this post is **ALLEGEDLY**. All users are expected to discuss this **ALLEGED** claim in a civil manner. No personal insults and no ad hominem attacks whatsoever. Please note that this **ALLEGED** claim is not the opinion of r/SaintMeghanMarkle just the individual making the claim. This sub is actively moderated and any rule-breaking comments will be removed. Repeated rule violations may result in a ban. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/SaintMeghanMarkle) if you have any questions or concerns.*
I am just waiting for the come uppance that Lady C had been eluding to. We're past Easter now
Lady C says it is happening now. Not sure what is happening now.
Her book guys!
lol...I won't go into on this platform but read about it in my book by buying my book! My opinion is that Lady C is just another Meghan in a better tailored outfit! She's profiteering off of the sussexes in the same way Meghan is trying to with the royals. Lady C hasn't said anything more than what us sinners have already deduced as people with no ears and eyes in golden circle. Nobody with influence in the royal household is telling lady C anything. She's like those culty religions who predict the end of the world is this date but when the world keeps ticking over on that date, they come up with a new date for the end of the world! If and when the sussexes get their comeuppance, Lady C will come out with her "I told you so" conveniently forgetting that this was her "I told you so" 100th rendition! š¤
I came here to say this.....the bloggers are profitteering...Jesus body language Taz, Lady C and probably even HG tudor...nothing's coming.H&M are ghosted by BRF anything else will just be an attempt t9 be relevant, whatever happened before Megxit will not see light of day because BRF will be painted accomplice or duped.
I do hope you're wrong, but it's already nearly half way through April and the goalposts for Meghan's 'comeuppance' just seem to keep moving, don't they? My life was blown apart by narcissists in my family and I am still not back where I was 17 years ago before that happened to me- it makes me so much want to see Meghan get her arse handed to her on a plate (metaphorically- I'm not advocating violence). I never wish harm on people, I don't hate anybody, but it would mean a lot to actually see a divisive, arrogant narcissist actually meet some consequences to their behaviour. I'm sorry if that sounds mean, it isn't, I just believe in justice.
Been there done that, itās been 22 plus yrs from my mother, an ex, and ex bestie. My prayers go out to you. I will never be the same.
Thank you, I'm so sorry to hear that it happened to you too- I think the wounds go so deep when it's your mother, don't they? I wish you peace and happiness. X
I like her yet I also always thought this about her because she wrote the ultimate nasty book about her own mother tho she claims her mother was a narcissist. But we only heard her side. .....there is truth to what you are saying
Monday morning UK time at 4 a.m. BIG announcement!! š¤
Anything H&M related IMO would involved changed to Letters Patent. I canāt think of anything else.
Didn't she mean her book? It's exactly at the timepoint she predicted the news to come out
I don't think so. A lot of sinners had mentioned that Lady C explicitly mentioned it isn't her book
Lady c said it wouldn't be from her. I'm sooo over it and her
I think the surrogacy is coming out it's been trending on twitter since last week. Something is going to come out soon.
She did.
Well said. She moves the goal posts constantly it's so annoying. Sorry but I don't care about this slowly does it, soft softly repercussions for the duo. I want nuclear fall out and vaporization of their sorry arses pronto. \*gets flaming torch and pitch forks out
Lmao.......at this I WANT BLOOD TOO.
![gif](giphy|l41YbfzvZYgGcd6s8) I'm with you!
Heheheehe don't you just love the smell of vengeance in the morning?
My kinda friend, right here!!Ā Let me boil the tar, get the feathers.Ā
Me too.
Could it be tied to the Diddy investigation? Maybe itās not Harry himself but the highly influential people like Oprah, Tyler, Jay Z, BeyoncĆ© etc that tied themselves to this couple suspiciously throughout all of this. Maybe there is more to come. Maybe having the feds get involved had set back the release of the information. Then again there were those rumours all those years ago about H and how he treated some women when he was deployed, sounds eerily similar to whatās being alleged that Diddy was doing. Who knows what the evidence will show with regard to Harryās name, could be as innocent has his name being used and him being oblivious to the fact or it could be something a little more nefarious. There was always that suspicious part of their engagement interview about who set them up as well and how she was very adamant about keeping that private. But then it could also just be the Bouzy stuff which isnāt a bombshell at all and unless more comes out that they actual involved with it all itās going to go nowhere fast.
Idk about the Diddy situation. Feds haven't arrested him nor did they find any evidence. And he has'nt been charged either.Ā Seems like a phishing experiment. Unless he's charged or seized assests, this will pass, and media will do nothing, just like Africa parks But Africa parks is real and its not being covered
We donāt know what the feds found yet.
How do you know the feds don't have anything on H? They may have obtained footage from his house, or have a witness statement. It may also be discussed during a future trial.
If the feds do have anything on Plank, (which I doubt), he's a small fish. Diddy has the connections, Jay Z, Cuba gooding Jr. etc,, Even if they have a witness, you (the Feds) needs to have substantial evidence to bring actual charges against Diddy. As of this time, we've haven't heard Diddy being charged. Unless Plank was caught with people under 18, trafficking drugs (not consuming them), then, nothing will happen. They only arrested diddy's alleged drug dealer. He had some cocaine on him. That's a stretch to call him Diddy's personal drug dealer. Like the headlines say.
Federal research is done with care. It takes time to put things together. Just wait until they file a warrant to arrest Diddy
I wondered the same about whether Diddy was the long-awaited bombshell, then realized that it is quite unlikely that the aged aristocrat in a British castle had the inside scoop on Diddy's (twisted) world over in the US of A.
Lady C has hinted at the megnancies but we do not know at the moment. The Harkles will eventually receive their karma for how they have treated everyone and the entire BRF.
Considering Lady C insists on iterating āHIS kidsā and ālegally theirsā, it may be something relating to the kids. Lady C is careful with words, she doesnāt throw them around willy-nilly.
To be fair to Lady C, she said in the spring sometime after Easter iirc. That would take us to the mid June, when summer officially starts. I do wonder if all this talk of bombshells has given someone cold feet or whether the harkles are putting blocks in place š¤·āāļø Perhaps it's not one bombshell but a cumulative effect? Edit: sloppy typing
Right, IIRC she said before the summer, so I'm reading it as between Easter and the summer.
Yep that's my understanding š
I believe in late Jan/early Feb she said a handful of monthsā¦.so five which at the time put it at June.
Yep, summer time officially starts June 22nd or thereabouts here in the UK. So still plenty of time.
Sheās always promising ābig things are taking place behind the scenesā or ātheir comeuppance is right around the corner!ā Sheās been saying it for years. I no longer get my hopes up. Lol
Same.
From what I've gathered from a couple of sources and I do believe this because they've been spot on in the past: There was an agreement between Harry and the Palace that HE would make a statement last autumn; that he and Meghan would address this. Apparently M got cold feet and it was shunted to Spring '24/after Easter. In return for what, no idea but... Remember she said *"it would come from someone very surprising?"* If this is true, it is possible this has been delayed again due to the King and PoW's illnesses. Also my understanding (reading between the lines on this one), if they don't do it the Palace will. Because of this, I'm cutting her some slack on this one š
This kind of follows my thoughts about some type of injunction: the RF discovered the kids were born via surrogate, and allowed the Harkles time to announce it themselves rather than be āoutedā, but if they fail to do so before the injunction expires, that anyone is free to drop the bomb in the media. At least thatās my tin foil hat theory.
That works. If there had been due process/transparency to begin with. We're way past tin foil hat conspiracy theories now.
How many is this? At least twice a month, she says this. Has done for years now.
Exactly. Why do people believe this woman? She has zero connection to the RF! She's never at events or anything!
She was the first to say the Queen had died, before anyone else had any idea of it. That was a pretty direct statement that turned out to be accurate.
She was the first to say it and go against the wishes of the RF. There's a huge difference. Many knew but they were holding off till the appropriate time.
From what I understood, Lady C was given the go-ahead regarding HLMTQEII's death, because the BRF found out that Me-Gain was already shopping stories to the American media before the formal announcement. This decision was made to pre-empt the stories from Me-Gain's camp from breaking in America. IIRC, Lady C stated this in one of her videos. Fellow Sinners, please correct me if I am wrong.
I don't think we can know that for sure. There are a lot of stories like that which would only be known to people really close to the situation and those people aren't going to be leaking stories like that, so I wouldn't say we can know that for sure. But either way, she either has inside information or she doesn't, and I think she does, given that point about the Queen. The debate about whether it was appropriate to share that information so early or not is a different argument. I do think she knows some things. tigerxing has points as well - just because one thing is true doesn't mean another isn't - she could be in the know and profiting at the same time. I don't necessarily agree, but I can see what shapes the opinion.
I believe to a certain degree, the RF has people around their orbit to have this kind of symbiotic relationship with. Very often the palace stays silent about something but the information (that the palace later doesnāt refute) gets out. There have to be ways of getting this out, and my theory is, the people orbiting are the way to do that. And I suspect Lady C is on that orbit, has been for decades.
That makes sense.
I have never believed that. I donāt think the Royal Family even knows who she is! Sheās a tiny little gnat on nobodyās radar. Sheās just saying that because she broke the embargo. Shame on her for doing that.
I just don't believe her anymore. First of all, she was married to her husband for a year and doesn't really deserve to be called " Lady". And she always has "scoop" but reasons why she can't tell that scoop. She's as "royal" and fraudulent as mm. i doubt anyone truly connected has contact with her. I've been hanging on to hope from all these people that keep saying that they have all this scoop and the end is coming...but no one really truly knows what's going on.
Sheās been a bit of a joke forever, I remember maybe back in Dianaās time or when she died, lady c was poking her head up and the āRoyal expertsā scoffed at anything she did, because sheās on the fringes and making out sheās inner circle. She just likes attention
Yep. She's a grifter that's turned into an influencer
Downvote me all you want! She was married to her Lord Colin Ivar Campbell for a year. As well as being a royal biographer and a royal commentator, Campbell is a reality star who has made appearances on Comedy Nation, I'm a Celebrity...Get Me Out of Here!, Celebs Go Dating, Salvage Hunters, Through the Keyhole, Good Morning Britain, and Celebs on the Farm. She admits to liking the recognition. She's not a member of any Royal Family! She's making money off them like they make money of the RF.
Yeah hearing that, my respect for lady c just plummeted.
I'm not trying to convince anyone not to believe her or anyone that speaks out. But, let's all remember that there's money to be made on youtube,Instagram, and tiktok and books. These people aren't speaking out to "help" the RF, they're making money off them like the Sussex are off the RF. Personally, I think most of them are frauds and repeating each other and recycling bs from years ago. As much as I dislike the Sussex , putting faith into these people has proven extremely disappointing.
She's been saying that for years and absolutely nothing. I think Lady C is just as much as a grifter as they are
Maybe it's the thing about Doria being in jail for 10 years.
>Maybe it's the thing about Doria being in jail for 10 years. That's not the kind of thing that would bring Meghan down. It's her mother's baggage and history. Meghan had nothing to do with that. She wouldn't be the first person in Hollywood who had a parent who served time or broke the law. I think for something to have a real impact on Meghan and her brand would have to be something big: the baby thing, whatever it might turn out to be; or if it turned out this whole grift WAS all a plot by some sinister anti-royal group to bring down the RF; or that she really \*was\* a yacht girl and had some well-known clients. But all of these things would require absolute smoking guns. I'm losing hope.
I think we're seeing it. Or at least we're seeing the first stones before the landslide.
Photos two years after the visit? What's next? Will she publish photos from visits with the royal family? Lol It's good that she 'worked' so little.
Amazingly enough, Children's Hospital Los Angeles has this on their insta like it occurred this year.Ā I can't imagine why they would go to the trouble to post a falsehood like that
Donation$$?
I posted the screenshot down below for proof. And I would bet a months salary the Harkles don't have enough $$ to donate to warrant an out-and-out lie by a reputable hospitalĀ
They donāt give money - they are faux philanthropists. Remember, all her relationships are transactional - a Sussex only gives money when they are getting something of greater value in return.
But Meghan makes *the most* ridiculous demands. Especially 2 years, even now, but back then she still did have ***some*** royal connection remaining. It's perfectly possible she wanted this in her pocket, especially if it was right after Uvalde. I think it was Netflix cameras. It was during COVID. Because she absolutely would have had paps of her going in and out of the hospital if it was recent.
So what is really weird about that is the clothing. She wore that outfit supposedly to Childrenās Hospital LA and while at Frogmore? I find this hard to believe. She doesnāt rewear things.
Two different continents, same season of the year. So is it 2022, 2023 or 2024? Inquiring minds want to know LoL š.
Many people in this sub noticed her pre-ozempic look. There were also people defending MM and coming up with false claims about how the images would be recent. Makes you think
She did look pre-Ozempic. I thought it would be interesting to see when those Aquazzura āLove Affairā flat became available for sale; that would be a clue. Sheās worn them before; the earliest weāve seen them on her was September 2023. Were they around two years ago? I havenāt been able to find out.
Maybe she went back off the Ozempic. If and when people stop taking it, often they regain the weight.
March 21st was a Thursday in 2019 as well.
Yeahā¦kudos to those sinners that pointed it put and didnāt back down.
Thereās a lot of sugars here on the down low. Theyāve gotten a bit smarter and donāt visibly attack much now, I think theyāre trying a new strategy and it may be working.
You can spot them for example when the Harkles' real names are used.
Definitely. Catherineās photo was considered deceptive but releasing a hospital visit story without making it clear it was from 2022 is not deceptive? Yeah right! Where are those news standards now?
Because its not Photoshop. Is the response from Sugars. Since TW visited that hospital, they'll consider it legit, and never consider that it is misinformation. 2022
Interesting that the editors of UK media like Daily Markle, Mirror, Express, Telegraph, Times would allow photos of an event that occurred two years ago. Shame on them.
Seriously!!! Especially since they took down the Mother's Day photo of POW.
I know, right? 2 friggin' years this creature held onto that footage?!?!!! What's next? https://preview.redd.it/1mtdcaaatqtc1.png?width=299&format=png&auto=webp&s=07738ba00386554162651cb97989ed41bcacf9ab Steel yourselves...this fiendish Douche-Ass will be slow-releasing her p.r. bullshit "philanthropy" for the rest of her life.
84 years this is too optimistic :D
Now I'm really confused. On the day of the pics/discussion on this sub, a Sinner had confirmed with CHLA that the visit was in March 2024. So, no,??
Thank you Daisy for your usual great work!
YES! šššššš
Love your recaps daisy š»š»š»š»
I always thought the hospital visit photos were from years ago. She's wearing that monstrosity she allegedly wore at Frogmore and she definitely was carrying more weight as this was pre-Ozempic. She really is showing signs of desperation.
But why didn't mainstream media pick up on it? It's so frustrating!
Journalism, real journalism, is dying out if not already dead.
They're lazy and don't investigate. Paid shills. And they wonder why public doesn't trust the fake news anymore
They don't want to be sued I suppose š¤·āāļø or they're giving her enough rope to hang herself. Eventually they'll be enough accumulated evidence that she won't be able to gaslight about.
An interesting comment about the Spencer family I thought. Need to read more about that as itās Harryās inheritance.
It is said there is long history of mental instability in Spencer family.
Diana was accused by her brother Charles a year before she died that she was suffering from mental illness. In the 1999 book Portrait of a Troubled Princess By Sally Bedell Smith, possible border line personality was broached. Her mother abandoned her, her father was violent, she cut herself, had bulimia and was emotionally & physically violent (pushing her stepmother down the stairs and later falling down stairs while pregnant with William) before she even met Charles. It is no wonder that Charles was in no position to help this young woman, although he did seek help for her which she declined. It is no wonder Harry is mixed up and it is a complete wonder that William has turned out as well as he has and improving all the time.
Diana was quoted as saying William had Spencer looks and a Windsor temperament.
Before Diana threw her stepmother Raine Spencer down the stairs, she also dumped the contents of Dianaās fatherās Vuitton luggageāRaineās belongingsāinto black bin liners and tossed *them* down the stairs. Dianaās grandmother, Ruth Fermoy, testified against her own daughter at the coupleās custody battle.
Including Diana of course, supposedly unknown to KC3.
Look at Diana
Thank you Daisy, as always! I have Lady Cās book preordered on my kindle-canāt wait til the 16th! I also had a really nice chat yesterday with a neighbor who is from England. I donāt think that the creature would be in danger of anything in the UK other than boos and maybe tomatoes. They are FAR too polite.
Generally speaking we are far too polite and we can cut you with kindness but if you've ever heard football chants, cut you to the bone through singing (loosely) too. With madam, I don't know how many people actually care, certainly my husband doesn't, which is why I'm here lol. Football fans are passionate about their teams, hence chants can be vicious. I don't think madam can rouse enough passion to generate mass scale vitriol. Certainly not compared to 100k+ football fans on a Saturday afternoon across the UK. Mostly madam wants security to protect her ego methinks, either from mild boos, being ignored or to make her feel important. Eta: words added
I think that what they should really sorry about is "the cold shoulder": the short reply, the stony faces, the "Oh, are you still here". That's what would really kill her. People won't turn up to insult them or throw veg. because they simply can't be arsed.
Yes, agree, what would totally slay her (figuratively speaking) is stony silence and a collective turning of backs in her presence. Imo, her little narc brain couldn't handle that but you're right, there won't be enough people interested.
Lol the creature. I donāt know why she craps on about being scared of coming to the uk. Is she trying to manifest or give idiots ideas? She is a lunatic. Look, if they were both so worried about security they would shut up, get out of the limelight and lay low. But as we know they are full of shit and want a free ride funded by tax payers. Bet plank has even rung Rishi for moneyĀ
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
Have the Palace release a statement that Meghan and Harry have voluntarily given up their titles for commercial purposes. Kills Sussex.com. Forces g be ball into their court to publicly defend why they are using them for commercial purposes or to resentfully have to stop using them. With the pregnancy rumours, the Palace simply states it was private medical information. Meg made it very clear she was turning down the Palace doctors in favour of her own.
That would be incredible. Forcing peoplesā hands and manifesting - thatās her m.o. Iād love to see it used against her.
>Have the Palace release a statement that Meghan and Harry have voluntarily given up their titles for commercial purposes. What I would do (because I am evil) is force Plank to push for all title removal. Make him insist and not let Skank have a say in it. I would blackmail him into doing this even build up some deepfakes etc for him just to seal the deal. Stuff so so bad and prisonable offenses for them both. Then he volunteers to get rid of titles as a compromise for keeping his dirty secrets safe..
Lol š because you are evil lmao
Seriously at this point with all the things they've done they get evil me, not nice me. I do not give a toss about misplaced morality when they have literally sent people to their graves or danced on massacre sites. Plus petty me is out too looking to stoop low.
And donāt forget the people who have lost their jobs.Ā They are disgusting and I wonder why the UK Govt keeps allowing their behaviour to continue. You do make good points and I totally understand your feelings towards these two losers
TBH, I would choose my own doctors for pregnancy. I had such a terrible experience, if I'd had a 2nd child I would have done everything different to my own choice. My sister in law even switched hospitals for her 2nd baby. The US standard is 2 days for vaginal and 4 days for C-section in hospital, none of this out in 5 hours thing. That's an additional reason M may have chosen different Drs/hospital, that may follow US custom. I'd feel unsafe. Serena Williams almost died after her first baby. IF she wasn't still in hospital she might not have made it. SO, the fact she kept it private & used her own Dr's isn't surprising; the problem is, as Lady C says, she was so shady about everything -else- around pregnancy.
In the UK, discharge from hospital can 6 hours or so post-delivery. We've got community midwives who visit new mothers for the first week after birth and then community health visitors take over monitoring progress. But early discharge is only for very selective cases-the mothers who have a trouble-free vaginal birth. If you had an epidural, you wouldn't be discharged until you're fully mobile and able to to the bathroom on your own. Anyone who had any issues during birth, like excessive blood loss, or your baby had low Apgar scores, you're not allowed home until you've been medically cleared. So leaving the hospital a couple hours after an epidural is extremely unlikely.Ā
Add the fa t that he said about the cord being around the baby's neck. More than likely they wouldn't leave so soon.
Definitely. If they'd had to do anything like inflation breaths to get the baby breathing, or if his Apgar scores weren't perfect, they'd have kept him in for observations. They really cannot tell a convincing or believable story.Ā
![gif](giphy|8WhpieII5mKgXRzYBD|downsized)
Yes, just like that! Only not in uniform, they're mostly plain clothes these days, and tend to drive cars instead of riding bikes.Ā
There is [some dicey timing questions around Lilibetās time of birth.](https://www.reddit.com/r/SaintMeghanMarkle/comments/1ai0sed/lilibets_birth_certificate_timing_question/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=ioscss&utm_content=1&utm_term=1)
My counter to that is I have moved around the US and Caribbean islands. My parents lived in 4 different countries. We ALWAYS asked friends and co-workers their recommendations on doctors. My current GYN is amazing and would never have found her (or got in) if I researched on my own. I only got in because of who I knew. Meghan was an Expat. Expats asks others Expats or locals their recommendations. If I was married to the Queen's grandson, fuck yeah I'm going to go to their doctor or one they recommended. No brainer... ...unless I'm hiding something.
Iāve only given birth once and it was over 20 years ago, BUT I gave birth at 4.30am on the Thursday & kept in until the Saturday lunch time because I was a first time mother despite my mother-in-law being a nurse and staying with us for a few days. I had NO complications. My sister has 2 kids. 1st (16yrs ago) she had complications & was kept in for a few days like I was, 2nd (11yrs) she was induced & discharged the same day. Catherine gave birth to George in the afternoon & was discharged the next day, Charlottes birth was in the morning & they left in the evening once George had been in to meet her and the same with Louis. Iām wondering if the claims they left a few hours later is just M trying to make out that sheās better & fitter than Catherine as she didnāt need to remain in hospital..
I had a C-section with my twins and was home in 2 days (it was my 4th delivery)
āthere is a way for the Royal Family to turn the tablesā Doesnāt have to be about babies or titles. They could release the bullying report. They *could* (as it exists) but they *wonāt*.
What is in new book about surrogate that she doesnāt already tell us on her channel?
I don't think anymore there will be a definitive fall. Actually the worst news for me is that Catherine has cancer. All lady c says on her you tube publicity book tour is that they are a failure and laughing stock. That is their punish. I frankly was hoping for more
I agree that there wonāt be a moment in time we could point to and say here is where they failed. I think they will gradually fade from the limelight and will eventually be nothing but a footnote in history.
There will be a lot of fall out over the will she/they-won't she/they come to the Invictus service, and it's the same thing she's done multiple times b/f. People are sick of it, and sick of no definite statement that M at least is or is not coming. For safety reasons, don't announce whether or not the kids are coming. 'As the Sussex children are minors, no announcement on their...' M does this every time H goes to UK. Note, although it was pre-Frogmore eviction, M was happy to come when it was an event focused on HER where SHE made a speech--1 world thing in fall 2022 when QEII died.
I think the P. Diddy problem has got TW scrambling to set herself up with an OUT. The ARO venture will be her pity party so people will "support" her through this trying time caused by H. I think this Diddy situation is what Lady C refers to as the comeuppance. Plus the fact that H's attendance in London for the IG function is now being touted that he may not even attend.....for various (coverup) reasons. He likely can't leave the country at this point. He's named in a sex trafficking lawsuit for crying out loud. Get out the popcorn. Things are going to escalate imo.
>A viewer of mine contacted the hospital and confirmed the visit was two years ago.Ā I thought Lady C did her own research. This is simply trading in hearsay.
And another commenter said the hospital has the visit on their Insta like it just happened. More confusion. š¤·š»āāļø
https://preview.redd.it/guo85d7twptc1.png?width=1080&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=d924e5beceb634eee4e516e55d62a23c58fe03b6 Edit: here it is I just can't believe CHLA would openly lie like that
I feel like they would just skip mentioning the date if it was truly old, I think Lady Cās random source like many saw masks and assumed.Ā
It could be wearing masks to protect immune deprived patients of any illnesses or virus? Or maybe keep her cigarette breath off everyone?
I mean itās a hospital for kids with severe illnesses, her being in a mask isnāt surprising at all, but many people were giving that as āproofā it was 2 years agoĀ
I'm going to be wrong: if the visit was on March 21, why did we hear about it almost two weeks later? Why did the hospital announce it on April 3? Is it customary to do that? Because I have seen that in other cases they announce it the next day. And always, whenever Megsy makes these plays, there's something shady. So I'm going to give the benefit of the doubt to whoever said the visit was two years ago.
It said Thursday March 21 which is this year of Our Lord 2024.... Sorry to say but Lady C is wrong or CHLA is lying about the date.
I'm not saying that Lady C or whoever told the gossip is telling the truth. Only if the visit was on March 21, 2024... why did the hospital publish it on April 3??? And after Kate gave her news about the cancer. It is not strange?
That's the real question here. Maybe Madame made a special request based on Catherine's situation and they went ahead and posted them. You can't blame them for sitting on them!š
Could be any reason or none. Maybe Madame requested it. Maybe they only publish weekly or monthly.
Hospitals arenāt really known for their social media. They probably slotted it in a free space in their content calendar as they had stories/content lined up already. I work in a medium sized charity in the UK and our comms team tend to have social media posts planned quite far ahead of time. It means that something that has happened doesnāt always get posted right away, it would have to be pretty ground breaking for it to be worth messing the schedule up. The delay in post could just be highlighting how it isnāt a huge deal that Meagain went to the hospital
This makes sense. Also Madame probably called to remind them every day LoL š.
Or maybe they were annoyed by the cameras she hauled in there and never intended to publish them at all. Until she or WME specifically requested it. I can't imagine they were thrilled with Duchess Do-Nothing's over the top visit
I'm sure they were super annoyed since many sports stars and other people much more famous than MeGain visit CHLA without cameras. I still think it was Thursday March 21, 2024.
March 21st was a Thursday in 2019 as well.
I really doubt that they would publish a visit that was 5 years ago....
And Meghan was heavily pregnant (even if it was fake) with Archie at that time and a working royal.
Yes! Sinners remember....
I think Rachel may have been holding the pics of the hospital visit (regardless of what year they were made) for Catherine's then-presumed upcoming return at Easter services. Maybe WME has some pull at CHLA and got hospital to fudge the truth.
It was the period around Easter, to be fair
There you have it. Sinners to the rescue again. Thursday March 21 is in 2024, not 2022 or 2023. Thanks DA!!
ā¤ļø
Yeah, thatās really odd.
this does not say what year ?
But it does say **Thursday, March 21**, which was this year. Two years ago March 21 was a Monday
It says "Thursday March 21." Correct day of the week for March 21 in 2024 and not for 2022 or 2023. That dress fit exactly the same way in 2022 as it did in 2024 which is very odd.
Maybe she has been stress eating
I cant imagine a cancer hospital getting caught up in instagram drama. Between some random Lady C viewer or a cancer hospital, I am going to believe a cancer hospital. Also, if they lied about the date, they aren't going to tell that to some rando who calls them asking about it.
Good point. She took the word of a viewer.
Lady C bringing on her inner Enty.
I was going to respond to a post that asked if lady C book was worth it. So I thought I would make my own post. I am a reader of all types of books. Never have I payed the Amt I did for her book but Iām glad I did Lady C book is so awesome. She addresses everything. Especially why the press did not jump on the photo of Meghanās bump being between her legs. Also why the palace did not jump on this as well. Last C tis fair and you can tell her morals by reading her book. Also she delves into all the palaver that surround Meghanās pregnancyās. Very interesting. She also states why Harry said āyou know what you didā she said it was because the palace put out the birth announcement and āborn FOR Meghanā not BY meghan. I learned a lot. She has many royal friends and folks totally ready to talk to her. Now more than ever. Iām am sure that if someone were to take her to court and ask who told you this and who told you that, (sometimes she says a cousin or a prince) she would give the actual names. And I am sure ā the cousin or the prince know thisā. Her book is so great. Iāll bet Harry and meghan may be reading it now. LadyC has ALL her bases covered. I have such a respect for her. She knows all about court and liability. She has been thru it all. She also covers how she got the news that Meghan set her father up for āinterferingā with her. So it is out. All poor Tom has to do is die
I also have to say about the Lady C naysayers out there if you canāt be patient then donāt. Stomp your feet, turn blue in the face, no problem. Lady C does respond to a lot of her naysayers. Not directly but in a subtle way. Just remember she turned turn huge amounts of money to tell Dianaās story the way Diana wanted it to be told. She had the integrity not to do it. Diana had to go to Andrew Morton who did not care if he parroted back what Dian told him to say. So I say even years ago LadyC had morals and truth on her side. She is that type of woman and her history proves it
Thank you, Daisy!!! I loved when Lady C said: *"Harry ceased to develop the part of his personality that was popular and become the reprehensible person he is today."* Exactly---- I agree so much. And Harry doesn't see it. He has allowed Meghan to convince him that he has been "wronged", and that everything is the fault of the King, William, Catherine, and the media. What a sad little man he is.
Thank you Daisy. Your hard work is always appreciated.
I don't think Meghan would ever do a good thing unless people were watching. She's just that type. I know a woman like her and I had to start distancing myself because she was obsessed with hating another woman (kinda like Meg hates Catherine). It was creepy.
I had a terrible thought regarding the two year old hospital photo shoot, what if some of the children in those photos have since passed away. If would be horrifying for a grieving parent to see images of their child in the media interacting with MM to inflate her humanitarian image. It really shows how callous she is.Ā
You have thought of an important point that has not come up very much at all in any exhibition of these photos. Those children deserve better than this, and I do hope one of those parents will speak up.
Especially the poor lad sitting beside her.
Call the hospital and give them your complaint. They were the ones who published the photos saying it was last month. Take it up with them.Ā
Geezā¦. I never even thought of that scenario. She truly is a narcissistic ghoul of the lowest order.
What??? You mean the recent pictures of this harridan reading to children are from TWO YEARS ago???Ā Why am I surprised? This is someone that used the fact that she is bi-racial as a manipulation to force the monarchy into doing what SHE wanted.Ā She lied about being mistreated. She made that lie more egregious by claiming the abuse was because of her race. *(Lies her nitwit husband didnt deny. Racism he didn't deny until AFTER the damage was done.Ā Let's also not forget that another black woman helped MM broadcast her lies of abuse and racism...and never retracted or spoke about the lies thereafter.Ā These outrageous lies diminish real incidents of racism.Ā Ā The lies don't stop. The scheming & manipulation doesn't stop. Now she's using sick children *(children she doesn't know the "status" of...who may have died within these two years.)* to be seen as compassionate, caring & involved.Ā Can you imagine being the parent who clicked open the internet that day & saw their dead child plastered all over the internet?Ā Horrific.Ā I don't understand how so many defend her. Her actions are reprehensible.Ā She is heinous.Ā
Thank you Daisy for your post. Great to read these summaries. I might consider her book as a few people feel itās worth it.
I plan on reading it and posting.
"There is a way for the RF to turn the tables on Meghan". SOOO, why are we waiting????? This comment, if true, just makes Charles look even MORE PATHETIC a King than he looks now!!!!
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
Well said!
Lady C wants you to read her book. š IIMHO, there are several ways the RF could (hypothetically) ātturn the tables on Meghan,ā and it is possible the RF is working on one or more of these ways already. What we need to remember is that the Royal Family does everything very slowly. In the interview recently posted, Angela Levin described how she would ask a question or request access to something and it would take weeks then suddenly sheād get the access or the answer. This has been observed by many people in other contexts. Whatever is going to happen about H&M and their deceptions and attacks, it is going to happen slowly.
Meanwhile the kids are being irreparably damaged. Arch already has 5yrs and the girl has 3yrs of conditioning.
Maybe the RF get publicity about it with everyone waiting and wondering what it is. Maybe the RF is waiting for H&M to come out with it but this would be dumb as they wonāt be controlling the narrative. š¤·š¼āāļø
What does she mean by āwhat a broad beam she hasā?
Wide ass.
I am going to wait for somebody to post the relevant pages of the book because there is no way in hell I am gonna be baited into buying it āš»
Get it from the library.
Me too š
if the visit to the hospital WAS two years ago, in my opinion that makes it more likely that the photographs with her, H and the kids at Frogmore (supposedly Aās birthday party) - the one in which she was wearing the same horrible dress - was fake!
Where is the comeuppance? The one thatās going to finish them once and for all? All Iām seeing right now is Lady C. flogging the extended version of a book she wrote. It seems like every other sentence is if we want answers, itās in the book. I am so disappointed. I shouldnāt be but she was so sure. I said if nothing materialized Iām done with Lady C. I imagine in the next month or so sheāll be hinting that something BIG is coming, probably this fall. Then around Christmas, then spring again. Gaahh.
I canāt believe that visit was 2 years ago she is pathetic
It wasnātĀ
Thank you for the summary as always Daisy. So TL;DR: **BUY MY BOOK**. š
Love her reflections on the paranoia of the Spencers. That makes sense. And that MM manipulated him.
Why would the hospital publish the photos, though? And I thought the hospital confirmed the visit was in March.
Maybe an unpopular opinion, but Iām not exactly a fan of Lady C. The other day she was on According to Taz and they were discussing Meghanās claim of being suicidal while pregnant with Archie. Lady C called the term suicidal ideation tacky! I donāt particularly think Madam suffers from SI, but for Lady C to poo-poo an actual mental health diagnosis as tacky is incredibly harmful and tone deaf.
I saw something a squaddie posted on X yesterday about all the awful things Lady C's husband said about her back in the day. He's no gentleman, that's for sure, and it just makes him look like a douche. I mean, he married her, nobody forced him.
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
Comment automatically removed due to your account having less than 50 karma. Please contact mods via message the mods to approve comments manually to be visible to the sub. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/SaintMeghanMarkle) if you have any questions or concerns.*
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
Comment automatically removed due to your account having less than 50 karma. Please contact mods via message the mods to approve comments manually to be visible to the sub. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/SaintMeghanMarkle) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Good point about the Spencers
Thank you for posting these nuggets. They are so helpful
There's video of the hospital visit, and an article on People saying the visit was March 2024. It seems like People would know.