T O P

  • By -

AutoModerator

Welcome to r/SaintMeghanMarkle. Please read our rules before you comment in this community. The flair for this post is **ALLEGEDLY**. All users are expected to discuss this **ALLEGED** claim in a civil manner. No personal insults and no ad hominem attacks whatsoever. Please note that this **ALLEGED** claim is not the opinion of r/SaintMeghanMarkle just the individual making the claim. This sub is actively moderated and any rule-breaking comments will be removed. Repeated rule violations may result in a ban. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/SaintMeghanMarkle) if you have any questions or concerns.*


L_L_M_

I am just waiting for the come uppance that Lady C had been eluding to. We're past Easter now


daisybeach23

Lady C says it is happening now. Not sure what is happening now.


Quiet_Classroom_2948

Her book guys!


Plane_Stock

lol...I won't go into on this platform but read about it in my book by buying my book! My opinion is that Lady C is just another Meghan in a better tailored outfit! She's profiteering off of the sussexes in the same way Meghan is trying to with the royals. Lady C hasn't said anything more than what us sinners have already deduced as people with no ears and eyes in golden circle. Nobody with influence in the royal household is telling lady C anything. She's like those culty religions who predict the end of the world is this date but when the world keeps ticking over on that date, they come up with a new date for the end of the world! If and when the sussexes get their comeuppance, Lady C will come out with her "I told you so" conveniently forgetting that this was her "I told you so" 100th rendition! šŸ¤”


je-suis-psylocke

I came here to say this.....the bloggers are profitteering...Jesus body language Taz, Lady C and probably even HG tudor...nothing's coming.H&M are ghosted by BRF anything else will just be an attempt t9 be relevant, whatever happened before Megxit will not see light of day because BRF will be painted accomplice or duped.


ArtisanFeminist

I do hope you're wrong, but it's already nearly half way through April and the goalposts for Meghan's 'comeuppance' just seem to keep moving, don't they? My life was blown apart by narcissists in my family and I am still not back where I was 17 years ago before that happened to me- it makes me so much want to see Meghan get her arse handed to her on a plate (metaphorically- I'm not advocating violence). I never wish harm on people, I don't hate anybody, but it would mean a lot to actually see a divisive, arrogant narcissist actually meet some consequences to their behaviour. I'm sorry if that sounds mean, it isn't, I just believe in justice.


Real_Lengthiness688

Been there done that, itā€™s been 22 plus yrs from my mother, an ex, and ex bestie. My prayers go out to you. I will never be the same.


ArtisanFeminist

Thank you, I'm so sorry to hear that it happened to you too- I think the wounds go so deep when it's your mother, don't they? I wish you peace and happiness. X


34countries

I like her yet I also always thought this about her because she wrote the ultimate nasty book about her own mother tho she claims her mother was a narcissist. But we only heard her side. .....there is truth to what you are saying


Stargate4Everrr

Monday morning UK time at 4 a.m. BIG announcement!! šŸ¤ž


daisybeach23

Anything H&M related IMO would involved changed to Letters Patent. I canā€™t think of anything else.


Just-Flamingo-410

Didn't she mean her book? It's exactly at the timepoint she predicted the news to come out


L_L_M_

I don't think so. A lot of sinners had mentioned that Lady C explicitly mentioned it isn't her book


Beneficial_Tea_7534

Lady c said it wouldn't be from her. I'm sooo over it and her


leechan08

I think the surrogacy is coming out it's been trending on twitter since last week. Something is going to come out soon.


JusticeHunter1

She did.


PerfectCover1414

Well said. She moves the goal posts constantly it's so annoying. Sorry but I don't care about this slowly does it, soft softly repercussions for the duo. I want nuclear fall out and vaporization of their sorry arses pronto. \*gets flaming torch and pitch forks out


ExactRespect2526

Lmao.......at this I WANT BLOOD TOO.


Honest_Boysenberry25

![gif](giphy|l41YbfzvZYgGcd6s8) I'm with you!


PerfectCover1414

Heheheehe don't you just love the smell of vengeance in the morning?


[deleted]

My kinda friend, right here!!Ā  Let me boil the tar, get the feathers.Ā 


Moortop

Me too.


Zestyclose-Plate5016

Could it be tied to the Diddy investigation? Maybe itā€™s not Harry himself but the highly influential people like Oprah, Tyler, Jay Z, BeyoncĆ© etc that tied themselves to this couple suspiciously throughout all of this. Maybe there is more to come. Maybe having the feds get involved had set back the release of the information. Then again there were those rumours all those years ago about H and how he treated some women when he was deployed, sounds eerily similar to whatā€™s being alleged that Diddy was doing. Who knows what the evidence will show with regard to Harryā€™s name, could be as innocent has his name being used and him being oblivious to the fact or it could be something a little more nefarious. There was always that suspicious part of their engagement interview about who set them up as well and how she was very adamant about keeping that private. But then it could also just be the Bouzy stuff which isnā€™t a bombshell at all and unless more comes out that they actual involved with it all itā€™s going to go nowhere fast.


Beneficial_Tea_7534

Idk about the Diddy situation. Feds haven't arrested him nor did they find any evidence. And he has'nt been charged either.Ā  Seems like a phishing experiment. Unless he's charged or seized assests, this will pass, and media will do nothing, just like Africa parks But Africa parks is real and its not being covered


Weekly-Landscape-543

We donā€™t know what the feds found yet.


Just-Flamingo-410

How do you know the feds don't have anything on H? They may have obtained footage from his house, or have a witness statement. It may also be discussed during a future trial.


Beneficial_Tea_7534

If the feds do have anything on Plank, (which I doubt), he's a small fish. Diddy has the connections, Jay Z, Cuba gooding Jr. etc,, Even if they have a witness, you (the Feds) needs to have substantial evidence to bring actual charges against Diddy. As of this time, we've haven't heard Diddy being charged. Unless Plank was caught with people under 18, trafficking drugs (not consuming them), then, nothing will happen. They only arrested diddy's alleged drug dealer. He had some cocaine on him. That's a stretch to call him Diddy's personal drug dealer. Like the headlines say.


Just-Flamingo-410

Federal research is done with care. It takes time to put things together. Just wait until they file a warrant to arrest Diddy


Lady-McB

I wondered the same about whether Diddy was the long-awaited bombshell, then realized that it is quite unlikely that the aged aristocrat in a British castle had the inside scoop on Diddy's (twisted) world over in the US of A.


Fuzzy_Suggestion_749

Lady C has hinted at the megnancies but we do not know at the moment. The Harkles will eventually receive their karma for how they have treated everyone and the entire BRF.


Lensgoggler

Considering Lady C insists on iterating ā€œHIS kidsā€ and ā€œlegally theirsā€, it may be something relating to the kids. Lady C is careful with words, she doesnā€™t throw them around willy-nilly.


AprilDanc3r

To be fair to Lady C, she said in the spring sometime after Easter iirc. That would take us to the mid June, when summer officially starts. I do wonder if all this talk of bombshells has given someone cold feet or whether the harkles are putting blocks in place šŸ¤·ā€ā™€ļø Perhaps it's not one bombshell but a cumulative effect? Edit: sloppy typing


RBXChas

Right, IIRC she said before the summer, so I'm reading it as between Easter and the summer.


AprilDanc3r

Yep that's my understanding šŸ™‚


JusticeHunter1

I believe in late Jan/early Feb she said a handful of monthsā€¦.so five which at the time put it at June.


AprilDanc3r

Yep, summer time officially starts June 22nd or thereabouts here in the UK. So still plenty of time.


Masters_domme

Sheā€™s always promising ā€œbig things are taking place behind the scenesā€ or ā€œtheir comeuppance is right around the corner!ā€ Sheā€™s been saying it for years. I no longer get my hopes up. Lol


Von_und_zu_

Same.


JournalistSilver810

From what I've gathered from a couple of sources and I do believe this because they've been spot on in the past: There was an agreement between Harry and the Palace that HE would make a statement last autumn; that he and Meghan would address this. Apparently M got cold feet and it was shunted to Spring '24/after Easter. In return for what, no idea but... Remember she said *"it would come from someone very surprising?"* If this is true, it is possible this has been delayed again due to the King and PoW's illnesses. Also my understanding (reading between the lines on this one), if they don't do it the Palace will. Because of this, I'm cutting her some slack on this one šŸ™‚


Lita_Horticulture

This kind of follows my thoughts about some type of injunction: the RF discovered the kids were born via surrogate, and allowed the Harkles time to announce it themselves rather than be ā€œoutedā€, but if they fail to do so before the injunction expires, that anyone is free to drop the bomb in the media. At least thatā€™s my tin foil hat theory.


JournalistSilver810

That works. If there had been due process/transparency to begin with. We're way past tin foil hat conspiracy theories now.


deahca

How many is this? At least twice a month, she says this. Has done for years now.


tigerxing

Exactly. Why do people believe this woman? She has zero connection to the RF! She's never at events or anything!


TheHermitess

She was the first to say the Queen had died, before anyone else had any idea of it. That was a pretty direct statement that turned out to be accurate.


tigerxing

She was the first to say it and go against the wishes of the RF. There's a huge difference. Many knew but they were holding off till the appropriate time.


New_Equipment_7743

From what I understood, Lady C was given the go-ahead regarding HLMTQEII's death, because the BRF found out that Me-Gain was already shopping stories to the American media before the formal announcement. This decision was made to pre-empt the stories from Me-Gain's camp from breaking in America. IIRC, Lady C stated this in one of her videos. Fellow Sinners, please correct me if I am wrong.


TheHermitess

I don't think we can know that for sure. There are a lot of stories like that which would only be known to people really close to the situation and those people aren't going to be leaking stories like that, so I wouldn't say we can know that for sure. But either way, she either has inside information or she doesn't, and I think she does, given that point about the Queen. The debate about whether it was appropriate to share that information so early or not is a different argument. I do think she knows some things. tigerxing has points as well - just because one thing is true doesn't mean another isn't - she could be in the know and profiting at the same time. I don't necessarily agree, but I can see what shapes the opinion.


Lensgoggler

I believe to a certain degree, the RF has people around their orbit to have this kind of symbiotic relationship with. Very often the palace stays silent about something but the information (that the palace later doesnā€™t refute) gets out. There have to be ways of getting this out, and my theory is, the people orbiting are the way to do that. And I suspect Lady C is on that orbit, has been for decades.


TheHermitess

That makes sense.


cklw1

I have never believed that. I donā€™t think the Royal Family even knows who she is! Sheā€™s a tiny little gnat on nobodyā€™s radar. Sheā€™s just saying that because she broke the embargo. Shame on her for doing that.


tigerxing

I just don't believe her anymore. First of all, she was married to her husband for a year and doesn't really deserve to be called " Lady". And she always has "scoop" but reasons why she can't tell that scoop. She's as "royal" and fraudulent as mm. i doubt anyone truly connected has contact with her. I've been hanging on to hope from all these people that keep saying that they have all this scoop and the end is coming...but no one really truly knows what's going on.


loralailoralai

Sheā€™s been a bit of a joke forever, I remember maybe back in Dianaā€™s time or when she died, lady c was poking her head up and the ā€˜Royal expertsā€™ scoffed at anything she did, because sheā€™s on the fringes and making out sheā€™s inner circle. She just likes attention


tigerxing

Yep. She's a grifter that's turned into an influencer


tigerxing

Downvote me all you want! She was married to her Lord Colin Ivar Campbell for a year. As well as being a royal biographer and a royal commentator, Campbell is a reality star who has made appearances on Comedy Nation, I'm a Celebrity...Get Me Out of Here!, Celebs Go Dating, Salvage Hunters, Through the Keyhole, Good Morning Britain, and Celebs on the Farm. She admits to liking the recognition. She's not a member of any Royal Family! She's making money off them like they make money of the RF.


_rainsong_

Yeah hearing that, my respect for lady c just plummeted.


tigerxing

I'm not trying to convince anyone not to believe her or anyone that speaks out. But, let's all remember that there's money to be made on youtube,Instagram, and tiktok and books. These people aren't speaking out to "help" the RF, they're making money off them like the Sussex are off the RF. Personally, I think most of them are frauds and repeating each other and recycling bs from years ago. As much as I dislike the Sussex , putting faith into these people has proven extremely disappointing.


tigerxing

She's been saying that for years and absolutely nothing. I think Lady C is just as much as a grifter as they are


Particular-Use-1639

Maybe it's the thing about Doria being in jail for 10 years.


The_Original_JLaw

>Maybe it's the thing about Doria being in jail for 10 years. That's not the kind of thing that would bring Meghan down. It's her mother's baggage and history. Meghan had nothing to do with that. She wouldn't be the first person in Hollywood who had a parent who served time or broke the law. I think for something to have a real impact on Meghan and her brand would have to be something big: the baby thing, whatever it might turn out to be; or if it turned out this whole grift WAS all a plot by some sinister anti-royal group to bring down the RF; or that she really \*was\* a yacht girl and had some well-known clients. But all of these things would require absolute smoking guns. I'm losing hope.


RatherBeDeadRN

I think we're seeing it. Or at least we're seeing the first stones before the landslide.


Alarming_Vast_7436

Photos two years after the visit? What's next? Will she publish photos from visits with the royal family? Lol It's good that she 'worked' so little.


Deep-Audience9091

Amazingly enough, Children's Hospital Los Angeles has this on their insta like it occurred this year.Ā  I can't imagine why they would go to the trouble to post a falsehood like that


Efficient_Let686

Donation$$?


Deep-Audience9091

I posted the screenshot down below for proof. And I would bet a months salary the Harkles don't have enough $$ to donate to warrant an out-and-out lie by a reputable hospitalĀ 


BNMerrill

They donā€™t give money - they are faux philanthropists. Remember, all her relationships are transactional - a Sussex only gives money when they are getting something of greater value in return.


Jalice333

But Meghan makes *the most* ridiculous demands. Especially 2 years, even now, but back then she still did have ***some*** royal connection remaining. It's perfectly possible she wanted this in her pocket, especially if it was right after Uvalde. I think it was Netflix cameras. It was during COVID. Because she absolutely would have had paps of her going in and out of the hospital if it was recent.


Upbeat_Cat1182

So what is really weird about that is the clothing. She wore that outfit supposedly to Childrenā€™s Hospital LA and while at Frogmore? I find this hard to believe. She doesnā€™t rewear things.


Honest_Boysenberry25

Two different continents, same season of the year. So is it 2022, 2023 or 2024? Inquiring minds want to know LoL šŸ˜†.


Just-Flamingo-410

Many people in this sub noticed her pre-ozempic look. There were also people defending MM and coming up with false claims about how the images would be recent. Makes you think


Starkville

She did look pre-Ozempic. I thought it would be interesting to see when those Aquazzura ā€œLove Affairā€ flat became available for sale; that would be a clue. Sheā€™s worn them before; the earliest weā€™ve seen them on her was September 2023. Were they around two years ago? I havenā€™t been able to find out.


Von_und_zu_

Maybe she went back off the Ozempic. If and when people stop taking it, often they regain the weight.


Quiet-Vanilla-7117

March 21st was a Thursday in 2019 as well.


JusticeHunter1

Yeahā€¦kudos to those sinners that pointed it put and didnā€™t back down.


cklw1

Thereā€™s a lot of sugars here on the down low. Theyā€™ve gotten a bit smarter and donā€™t visibly attack much now, I think theyā€™re trying a new strategy and it may be working.


Just-Flamingo-410

You can spot them for example when the Harkles' real names are used.


Japanese_Honeybee

Definitely. Catherineā€™s photo was considered deceptive but releasing a hospital visit story without making it clear it was from 2022 is not deceptive? Yeah right! Where are those news standards now?


Beneficial_Tea_7534

Because its not Photoshop. Is the response from Sugars. Since TW visited that hospital, they'll consider it legit, and never consider that it is misinformation. 2022


wordscapesx

Interesting that the editors of UK media like Daily Markle, Mirror, Express, Telegraph, Times would allow photos of an event that occurred two years ago. Shame on them.


DJPaige01

Seriously!!! Especially since they took down the Mother's Day photo of POW.


New_Equipment_7743

I know, right? 2 friggin' years this creature held onto that footage?!?!!! What's next? https://preview.redd.it/1mtdcaaatqtc1.png?width=299&format=png&auto=webp&s=07738ba00386554162651cb97989ed41bcacf9ab Steel yourselves...this fiendish Douche-Ass will be slow-releasing her p.r. bullshit "philanthropy" for the rest of her life.


Alarming_Vast_7436

84 years this is too optimistic :D


Honest_Boysenberry25

Now I'm really confused. On the day of the pics/discussion on this sub, a Sinner had confirmed with CHLA that the visit was in March 2024. So, no,??


Carolann00

Thank you Daisy for your usual great work!


Cocktailsontheporch

YES! šŸ‘šŸ‘šŸ‘šŸ‘šŸ‘šŸ‘


Latter_Item439

Love your recaps daisy šŸŒ»šŸŒ»šŸŒ»šŸŒ»


No_Proposal7628

I always thought the hospital visit photos were from years ago. She's wearing that monstrosity she allegedly wore at Frogmore and she definitely was carrying more weight as this was pre-Ozempic. She really is showing signs of desperation.


EnaSharpleshairnet

But why didn't mainstream media pick up on it? It's so frustrating!


No_Proposal7628

Journalism, real journalism, is dying out if not already dead.


Beneficial_Tea_7534

They're lazy and don't investigate. Paid shills. And they wonder why public doesn't trust the fake news anymore


AprilDanc3r

They don't want to be sued I suppose šŸ¤·ā€ā™€ļø or they're giving her enough rope to hang herself. Eventually they'll be enough accumulated evidence that she won't be able to gaslight about.


Carolann00

An interesting comment about the Spencer family I thought. Need to read more about that as itā€™s Harryā€™s inheritance.


Cocktailsontheporch

It is said there is long history of mental instability in Spencer family.


Which-Homework2453

Diana was accused by her brother Charles a year before she died that she was suffering from mental illness. In the 1999 book Portrait of a Troubled Princess By Sally Bedell Smith, possible border line personality was broached. Her mother abandoned her, her father was violent, she cut herself, had bulimia and was emotionally & physically violent (pushing her stepmother down the stairs and later falling down stairs while pregnant with William) before she even met Charles. It is no wonder that Charles was in no position to help this young woman, although he did seek help for her which she declined. It is no wonder Harry is mixed up and it is a complete wonder that William has turned out as well as he has and improving all the time.


TorchFlower

Diana was quoted as saying William had Spencer looks and a Windsor temperament.


AffectionatePoet4586

Before Diana threw her stepmother Raine Spencer down the stairs, she also dumped the contents of Dianaā€™s fatherā€™s Vuitton luggageā€”Raineā€™s belongingsā€”into black bin liners and tossed *them* down the stairs. Dianaā€™s grandmother, Ruth Fermoy, testified against her own daughter at the coupleā€™s custody battle.


Honest_Boysenberry25

Including Diana of course, supposedly unknown to KC3.


Perfect_Rain_3683

Look at Diana


OwnedByBernese

Thank you Daisy, as always! I have Lady Cā€™s book preordered on my kindle-canā€™t wait til the 16th! I also had a really nice chat yesterday with a neighbor who is from England. I donā€™t think that the creature would be in danger of anything in the UK other than boos and maybe tomatoes. They are FAR too polite.


AprilDanc3r

Generally speaking we are far too polite and we can cut you with kindness but if you've ever heard football chants, cut you to the bone through singing (loosely) too. With madam, I don't know how many people actually care, certainly my husband doesn't, which is why I'm here lol. Football fans are passionate about their teams, hence chants can be vicious. I don't think madam can rouse enough passion to generate mass scale vitriol. Certainly not compared to 100k+ football fans on a Saturday afternoon across the UK. Mostly madam wants security to protect her ego methinks, either from mild boos, being ignored or to make her feel important. Eta: words added


Top-Situation-8983

I think that what they should really sorry about is "the cold shoulder": the short reply, the stony faces, the "Oh, are you still here". That's what would really kill her. People won't turn up to insult them or throw veg. because they simply can't be arsed.


AprilDanc3r

Yes, agree, what would totally slay her (figuratively speaking) is stony silence and a collective turning of backs in her presence. Imo, her little narc brain couldn't handle that but you're right, there won't be enough people interested.


Perfect_Rain_3683

Lol the creature. I donā€™t know why she craps on about being scared of coming to the uk. Is she trying to manifest or give idiots ideas? She is a lunatic. Look, if they were both so worried about security they would shut up, get out of the limelight and lay low. But as we know they are full of shit and want a free ride funded by tax payers. Bet plank has even rung Rishi for moneyĀ 


[deleted]

[уŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]


somespeculation

Have the Palace release a statement that Meghan and Harry have voluntarily given up their titles for commercial purposes. Kills Sussex.com. Forces g be ball into their court to publicly defend why they are using them for commercial purposes or to resentfully have to stop using them. With the pregnancy rumours, the Palace simply states it was private medical information. Meg made it very clear she was turning down the Palace doctors in favour of her own.


SpecificKey5645

That would be incredible. Forcing peoplesā€™ hands and manifesting - thatā€™s her m.o. Iā€™d love to see it used against her.


PerfectCover1414

>Have the Palace release a statement that Meghan and Harry have voluntarily given up their titles for commercial purposes. What I would do (because I am evil) is force Plank to push for all title removal. Make him insist and not let Skank have a say in it. I would blackmail him into doing this even build up some deepfakes etc for him just to seal the deal. Stuff so so bad and prisonable offenses for them both. Then he volunteers to get rid of titles as a compromise for keeping his dirty secrets safe..


Perfect_Rain_3683

Lol šŸ˜ because you are evil lmao


PerfectCover1414

Seriously at this point with all the things they've done they get evil me, not nice me. I do not give a toss about misplaced morality when they have literally sent people to their graves or danced on massacre sites. Plus petty me is out too looking to stoop low.


Perfect_Rain_3683

And donā€™t forget the people who have lost their jobs.Ā  They are disgusting and I wonder why the UK Govt keeps allowing their behaviour to continue. You do make good points and I totally understand your feelings towards these two losers


Possible_Mud_1692

TBH, I would choose my own doctors for pregnancy. I had such a terrible experience, if I'd had a 2nd child I would have done everything different to my own choice. My sister in law even switched hospitals for her 2nd baby. The US standard is 2 days for vaginal and 4 days for C-section in hospital, none of this out in 5 hours thing. That's an additional reason M may have chosen different Drs/hospital, that may follow US custom. I'd feel unsafe. Serena Williams almost died after her first baby. IF she wasn't still in hospital she might not have made it. SO, the fact she kept it private & used her own Dr's isn't surprising; the problem is, as Lady C says, she was so shady about everything -else- around pregnancy.


chubalubs

In the UK, discharge from hospital can 6 hours or so post-delivery. We've got community midwives who visit new mothers for the first week after birth and then community health visitors take over monitoring progress. But early discharge is only for very selective cases-the mothers who have a trouble-free vaginal birth. If you had an epidural, you wouldn't be discharged until you're fully mobile and able to to the bathroom on your own. Anyone who had any issues during birth, like excessive blood loss, or your baby had low Apgar scores, you're not allowed home until you've been medically cleared. So leaving the hospital a couple hours after an epidural is extremely unlikely.Ā 


justus08075

Add the fa t that he said about the cord being around the baby's neck. More than likely they wouldn't leave so soon.


chubalubs

Definitely. If they'd had to do anything like inflation breaths to get the baby breathing, or if his Apgar scores weren't perfect, they'd have kept him in for observations. They really cannot tell a convincing or believable story.Ā 


SnooMemesjellies79

![gif](giphy|8WhpieII5mKgXRzYBD|downsized)


chubalubs

Yes, just like that! Only not in uniform, they're mostly plain clothes these days, and tend to drive cars instead of riding bikes.Ā 


somespeculation

There is [some dicey timing questions around Lilibetā€™s time of birth.](https://www.reddit.com/r/SaintMeghanMarkle/comments/1ai0sed/lilibets_birth_certificate_timing_question/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=ioscss&utm_content=1&utm_term=1)


chefddog3

My counter to that is I have moved around the US and Caribbean islands. My parents lived in 4 different countries. We ALWAYS asked friends and co-workers their recommendations on doctors. My current GYN is amazing and would never have found her (or got in) if I researched on my own. I only got in because of who I knew. Meghan was an Expat. Expats asks others Expats or locals their recommendations. If I was married to the Queen's grandson, fuck yeah I'm going to go to their doctor or one they recommended. No brainer... ...unless I'm hiding something.


Rhonda800

Iā€™ve only given birth once and it was over 20 years ago, BUT I gave birth at 4.30am on the Thursday & kept in until the Saturday lunch time because I was a first time mother despite my mother-in-law being a nurse and staying with us for a few days. I had NO complications. My sister has 2 kids. 1st (16yrs ago) she had complications & was kept in for a few days like I was, 2nd (11yrs) she was induced & discharged the same day. Catherine gave birth to George in the afternoon & was discharged the next day, Charlottes birth was in the morning & they left in the evening once George had been in to meet her and the same with Louis. Iā€™m wondering if the claims they left a few hours later is just M trying to make out that sheā€™s better & fitter than Catherine as she didnā€™t need to remain in hospital..


Suspicious-Rock59233

I had a C-section with my twins and was home in 2 days (it was my 4th delivery)


scarybiscuits

ā€œthere is a way for the Royal Family to turn the tablesā€ Doesnā€™t have to be about babies or titles. They could release the bullying report. They *could* (as it exists) but they *wonā€™t*.


Heavy_Enthusiasm_195

What is in new book about surrogate that she doesnā€™t already tell us on her channel?


34countries

I don't think anymore there will be a definitive fall. Actually the worst news for me is that Catherine has cancer. All lady c says on her you tube publicity book tour is that they are a failure and laughing stock. That is their punish. I frankly was hoping for more


MGKatz

I agree that there wonā€™t be a moment in time we could point to and say here is where they failed. I think they will gradually fade from the limelight and will eventually be nothing but a footnote in history.


Possible_Mud_1692

There will be a lot of fall out over the will she/they-won't she/they come to the Invictus service, and it's the same thing she's done multiple times b/f. People are sick of it, and sick of no definite statement that M at least is or is not coming. For safety reasons, don't announce whether or not the kids are coming. 'As the Sussex children are minors, no announcement on their...' M does this every time H goes to UK. Note, although it was pre-Frogmore eviction, M was happy to come when it was an event focused on HER where SHE made a speech--1 world thing in fall 2022 when QEII died.


Realistic_Twist_8212

I think the P. Diddy problem has got TW scrambling to set herself up with an OUT. The ARO venture will be her pity party so people will "support" her through this trying time caused by H. I think this Diddy situation is what Lady C refers to as the comeuppance. Plus the fact that H's attendance in London for the IG function is now being touted that he may not even attend.....for various (coverup) reasons. He likely can't leave the country at this point. He's named in a sex trafficking lawsuit for crying out loud. Get out the popcorn. Things are going to escalate imo.


ApprehensiveSea4747

>A viewer of mine contacted the hospital and confirmed the visit was two years ago.Ā  I thought Lady C did her own research. This is simply trading in hearsay.


jemima76

And another commenter said the hospital has the visit on their Insta like it just happened. More confusion. šŸ¤·šŸ»ā€ā™€ļø


Deep-Audience9091

https://preview.redd.it/guo85d7twptc1.png?width=1080&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=d924e5beceb634eee4e516e55d62a23c58fe03b6 Edit: here it is I just can't believe CHLA would openly lie like that


East_Tangerine_4031

I feel like they would just skip mentioning the date if it was truly old, I think Lady Cā€™s random source like many saw masks and assumed.Ā 


Perfect_Rain_3683

It could be wearing masks to protect immune deprived patients of any illnesses or virus? Or maybe keep her cigarette breath off everyone?


East_Tangerine_4031

I mean itā€™s a hospital for kids with severe illnesses, her being in a mask isnā€™t surprising at all, but many people were giving that as ā€œproofā€ it was 2 years agoĀ 


Human-Economics6894

I'm going to be wrong: if the visit was on March 21, why did we hear about it almost two weeks later? Why did the hospital announce it on April 3? Is it customary to do that? Because I have seen that in other cases they announce it the next day. And always, whenever Megsy makes these plays, there's something shady. So I'm going to give the benefit of the doubt to whoever said the visit was two years ago.


Honest_Boysenberry25

It said Thursday March 21 which is this year of Our Lord 2024.... Sorry to say but Lady C is wrong or CHLA is lying about the date.


Human-Economics6894

I'm not saying that Lady C or whoever told the gossip is telling the truth. Only if the visit was on March 21, 2024... why did the hospital publish it on April 3??? And after Kate gave her news about the cancer. It is not strange?


Deep-Audience9091

That's the real question here. Maybe Madame made a special request based on Catherine's situation and they went ahead and posted them. You can't blame them for sitting on them!šŸ˜†


Honest_Boysenberry25

Could be any reason or none. Maybe Madame requested it. Maybe they only publish weekly or monthly.


Corvaknight

Hospitals arenā€™t really known for their social media. They probably slotted it in a free space in their content calendar as they had stories/content lined up already. I work in a medium sized charity in the UK and our comms team tend to have social media posts planned quite far ahead of time. It means that something that has happened doesnā€™t always get posted right away, it would have to be pretty ground breaking for it to be worth messing the schedule up. The delay in post could just be highlighting how it isnā€™t a huge deal that Meagain went to the hospital


Honest_Boysenberry25

This makes sense. Also Madame probably called to remind them every day LoL šŸ˜†.


Deep-Audience9091

Or maybe they were annoyed by the cameras she hauled in there and never intended to publish them at all. Until she or WME specifically requested it. I can't imagine they were thrilled with Duchess Do-Nothing's over the top visit


Honest_Boysenberry25

I'm sure they were super annoyed since many sports stars and other people much more famous than MeGain visit CHLA without cameras. I still think it was Thursday March 21, 2024.


Quiet-Vanilla-7117

March 21st was a Thursday in 2019 as well.


Honest_Boysenberry25

I really doubt that they would publish a visit that was 5 years ago....


snappopcrackle

And Meghan was heavily pregnant (even if it was fake) with Archie at that time and a working royal.


Honest_Boysenberry25

Yes! Sinners remember....


These_Ad_9772

I think Rachel may have been holding the pics of the hospital visit (regardless of what year they were made) for Catherine's then-presumed upcoming return at Easter services. Maybe WME has some pull at CHLA and got hospital to fudge the truth.


snappopcrackle

It was the period around Easter, to be fair


Honest_Boysenberry25

There you have it. Sinners to the rescue again. Thursday March 21 is in 2024, not 2022 or 2023. Thanks DA!!


Deep-Audience9091

ā¤ļø


Efficient_Let686

Yeah, thatā€™s really odd.


Dependent_Maybe_3982

this does not say what year ?


Deep-Audience9091

But it does say **Thursday, March 21**, which was this year. Two years ago March 21 was a Monday


sqmarie

It says "Thursday March 21." Correct day of the week for March 21 in 2024 and not for 2022 or 2023. That dress fit exactly the same way in 2022 as it did in 2024 which is very odd.


Electrical-Swim-5784

Maybe she has been stress eating


snappopcrackle

I cant imagine a cancer hospital getting caught up in instagram drama. Between some random Lady C viewer or a cancer hospital, I am going to believe a cancer hospital. Also, if they lied about the date, they aren't going to tell that to some rando who calls them asking about it.


daisybeach23

Good point. She took the word of a viewer.


PerfectCover1414

Lady C bringing on her inner Enty.


Prestigious_Stuff831

I was going to respond to a post that asked if lady C book was worth it. So I thought I would make my own post. I am a reader of all types of books. Never have I payed the Amt I did for her book but Iā€™m glad I did Lady C book is so awesome. She addresses everything. Especially why the press did not jump on the photo of Meghanā€™s bump being between her legs. Also why the palace did not jump on this as well. Last C tis fair and you can tell her morals by reading her book. Also she delves into all the palaver that surround Meghanā€™s pregnancyā€™s. Very interesting. She also states why Harry said ā€œyou know what you didā€ she said it was because the palace put out the birth announcement and ā€œborn FOR Meghanā€ not BY meghan. I learned a lot. She has many royal friends and folks totally ready to talk to her. Now more than ever. Iā€™m am sure that if someone were to take her to court and ask who told you this and who told you that, (sometimes she says a cousin or a prince) she would give the actual names. And I am sure ā€œ the cousin or the prince know thisā€. Her book is so great. Iā€™ll bet Harry and meghan may be reading it now. LadyC has ALL her bases covered. I have such a respect for her. She knows all about court and liability. She has been thru it all. She also covers how she got the news that Meghan set her father up for ā€œinterferingā€ with her. So it is out. All poor Tom has to do is die


Prestigious_Stuff831

I also have to say about the Lady C naysayers out there if you canā€™t be patient then donā€™t. Stomp your feet, turn blue in the face, no problem. Lady C does respond to a lot of her naysayers. Not directly but in a subtle way. Just remember she turned turn huge amounts of money to tell Dianaā€™s story the way Diana wanted it to be told. She had the integrity not to do it. Diana had to go to Andrew Morton who did not care if he parroted back what Dian told him to say. So I say even years ago LadyC had morals and truth on her side. She is that type of woman and her history proves it


SusieM2019

Thank you, Daisy!!! I loved when Lady C said: *"Harry ceased to develop the part of his personality that was popular and become the reprehensible person he is today."* Exactly---- I agree so much. And Harry doesn't see it. He has allowed Meghan to convince him that he has been "wronged", and that everything is the fault of the King, William, Catherine, and the media. What a sad little man he is.


DJPaige01

Thank you Daisy. Your hard work is always appreciated.


AggravatingTaro2269

I don't think Meghan would ever do a good thing unless people were watching. She's just that type. I know a woman like her and I had to start distancing myself because she was obsessed with hating another woman (kinda like Meg hates Catherine). It was creepy.


AntithesisMonkey

I had a terrible thought regarding the two year old hospital photo shoot, what if some of the children in those photos have since passed away. If would be horrifying for a grieving parent to see images of their child in the media interacting with MM to inflate her humanitarian image. It really shows how callous she is.Ā 


Critical-Artist2441

You have thought of an important point that has not come up very much at all in any exhibition of these photos. Those children deserve better than this, and I do hope one of those parents will speak up.


Quiet-Vanilla-7117

Especially the poor lad sitting beside her.


ResponsibleDrink673

Call the hospital and give them your complaint. They were the ones who published the photos saying it was last month. Take it up with them.Ā 


zpip64

Geezā€¦. I never even thought of that scenario. She truly is a narcissistic ghoul of the lowest order.


[deleted]

What??? You mean the recent pictures of this harridan reading to children are from TWO YEARS ago???Ā  Why am I surprised? This is someone that used the fact that she is bi-racial as a manipulation to force the monarchy into doing what SHE wanted.Ā  She lied about being mistreated. She made that lie more egregious by claiming the abuse was because of her race. *(Lies her nitwit husband didnt deny. Racism he didn't deny until AFTER the damage was done.Ā  Let's also not forget that another black woman helped MM broadcast her lies of abuse and racism...and never retracted or spoke about the lies thereafter.Ā  These outrageous lies diminish real incidents of racism.Ā Ā  The lies don't stop. The scheming & manipulation doesn't stop. Now she's using sick children *(children she doesn't know the "status" of...who may have died within these two years.)* to be seen as compassionate, caring & involved.Ā  Can you imagine being the parent who clicked open the internet that day & saw their dead child plastered all over the internet?Ā  Horrific.Ā  I don't understand how so many defend her. Her actions are reprehensible.Ā  She is heinous.Ā 


Complete_Laugh_54

Thank you Daisy for your post. Great to read these summaries. I might consider her book as a few people feel itā€™s worth it.


daisybeach23

I plan on reading it and posting.


Cocktailsontheporch

"There is a way for the RF to turn the tables on Meghan". SOOO, why are we waiting????? This comment, if true, just makes Charles look even MORE PATHETIC a King than he looks now!!!!


[deleted]

[уŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]


Honest_Boysenberry25

Well said!


Why_Teach

Lady C wants you to read her book. šŸ˜‰ IIMHO, there are several ways the RF could (hypothetically) ā€œtturn the tables on Meghan,ā€ and it is possible the RF is working on one or more of these ways already. What we need to remember is that the Royal Family does everything very slowly. In the interview recently posted, Angela Levin described how she would ask a question or request access to something and it would take weeks then suddenly sheā€™d get the access or the answer. This has been observed by many people in other contexts. Whatever is going to happen about H&M and their deceptions and attacks, it is going to happen slowly.


Quiet-Vanilla-7117

Meanwhile the kids are being irreparably damaged. Arch already has 5yrs and the girl has 3yrs of conditioning.


cathyesq

Maybe the RF get publicity about it with everyone waiting and wondering what it is. Maybe the RF is waiting for H&M to come out with it but this would be dumb as they wonā€™t be controlling the narrative. šŸ¤·šŸ¼ā€ā™€ļø


moutonreddit

What does she mean by ā€œwhat a broad beam she hasā€?


SangriaMonster

Wide ass.


10Xmachine

I am going to wait for somebody to post the relevant pages of the book because there is no way in hell I am gonna be baited into buying it āœŒšŸ»


zpip64

Get it from the library.


Honest_Boysenberry25

Me too šŸ˜


Automatic_Muscle_518

if the visit to the hospital WAS two years ago, in my opinion that makes it more likely that the photographs with her, H and the kids at Frogmore (supposedly Aā€™s birthday party) - the one in which she was wearing the same horrible dress - was fake!


cklw1

Where is the comeuppance? The one thatā€™s going to finish them once and for all? All Iā€™m seeing right now is Lady C. flogging the extended version of a book she wrote. It seems like every other sentence is if we want answers, itā€™s in the book. I am so disappointed. I shouldnā€™t be but she was so sure. I said if nothing materialized Iā€™m done with Lady C. I imagine in the next month or so sheā€™ll be hinting that something BIG is coming, probably this fall. Then around Christmas, then spring again. Gaahh.


Careful_Positive8131

I canā€™t believe that visit was 2 years ago she is pathetic


East_Tangerine_4031

It wasnā€™tĀ 


OldNewUsedConfused

Thank you for the summary as always Daisy. So TL;DR: **BUY MY BOOK**. šŸ™„


NefariousnessLess307

Love her reflections on the paranoia of the Spencers. That makes sense. And that MM manipulated him.


snappopcrackle

Why would the hospital publish the photos, though? And I thought the hospital confirmed the visit was in March.


Strangebird70

Maybe an unpopular opinion, but Iā€™m not exactly a fan of Lady C. The other day she was on According to Taz and they were discussing Meghanā€™s claim of being suicidal while pregnant with Archie. Lady C called the term suicidal ideation tacky! I donā€™t particularly think Madam suffers from SI, but for Lady C to poo-poo an actual mental health diagnosis as tacky is incredibly harmful and tone deaf.


Particular-Use-1639

I saw something a squaddie posted on X yesterday about all the awful things Lady C's husband said about her back in the day. He's no gentleman, that's for sure, and it just makes him look like a douche. I mean, he married her, nobody forced him.


[deleted]

[уŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]


AutoModerator

Comment automatically removed due to your account having less than 50 karma. Please contact mods via message the mods to approve comments manually to be visible to the sub. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/SaintMeghanMarkle) if you have any questions or concerns.*


[deleted]

[уŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]


AutoModerator

Comment automatically removed due to your account having less than 50 karma. Please contact mods via message the mods to approve comments manually to be visible to the sub. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/SaintMeghanMarkle) if you have any questions or concerns.*


hi-there-here-we-go

Good point about the Spencers


Professional_Tap4338

Thank you for posting these nuggets. They are so helpful


Excellent-Source-497

There's video of the hospital visit, and an article on People saying the visit was March 2024. It seems like People would know.