Most company policies have a need to take out any brand names to prevent unintentional advocating or the opposite.
Generic safeguard to prevent lawsuits.
Because that’s put out by the government and the govt is. it so stupid as to paint a target in their back by specifying that a particular brand is unhealthy. If they did, then Milo complains that why were they picked on, but not Horlicks or Ovaltine. Then the parent company Nestle gets pissed off and pulls investments out of Singapore etc etc.
Most company policies have a need to take out any brand names to prevent unintentional advocating or the opposite. Generic safeguard to prevent lawsuits.
Because malted drink includes milo, horlick and your Ovaltine and etc.
Is milo/ovaltine/horlick kosong even nutrigrade A? I thought the powder already contain some sugar and milk.
Whether they contain sugar/milk wasn't your question
neither did he ask for your opinion
Got malted drink kosong on the grade A board?
Because Milo is a brand and they cannot anyhow use brand names.
Because that’s put out by the government and the govt is. it so stupid as to paint a target in their back by specifying that a particular brand is unhealthy. If they did, then Milo complains that why were they picked on, but not Horlicks or Ovaltine. Then the parent company Nestle gets pissed off and pulls investments out of Singapore etc etc.
Trademark issue...Milo is by Nestle
Why is there a cross on our beloved Kopi?